HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUB201900127 Review Comments Family Division Plat 2019-09-06COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(434) 296-5832
Memorandum
To: Steve Garrett, L.S., Commonwealth Land Surveying, LLC (stevekvacls.com)
Charles S. Durrer, Sr. (cdurrer4kembargmail.com)
From: Mariah Gleason
Division: Community Development — Planning
Date: September 6, 2019
Subject: SUB201900127 Durrer Family Division
The County of Albemarle Planning Division will recommend approval of the plat referenced above once the following
comments, and those provided by other Site Review Committee, SRC, members, have been satisfactorily addressed. The
following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or
eliminated based on further review. [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.]
1. [14-212(A)(2), Family Subdivision Application] Affidavit. A signed, notarized copy of the affidavit, as provided in the
family subdivision application, is a mandatory component of the subdivision application and will needed before the final
plat can be approved.
2. [14-212(B)] Restrictive covenants. Restrictive covenants are required on lots created by family subdivision. Please submit
covenants that meet the requirements of Sec. 14-212(B) to the staff reviewer in the next submission. Staff will forward these
materials to the County Attorney for review and approval. This will be needed before the final plat can be approved.
3. [14-212(D)] Family subdivision note. Include the following required note on the plat: "No lot shown on this family
subdivision plat may be sold or conveyed to a person other than an eligible `member of the immediate family,' as that term
is defined in Chapter 14 of the Albemarle County Code, for a period of four (4) years after the date of recordation of this
plat except as authorized by Sec. 14-212(A) of the Albemarle County Code. If any lot created by the recordation of this plat
is conveyed back to the grantor during the four (4) year period, it shall be recombined with the parent lot within six (6)
months after such conveyance."
4. [14-301(A)] Scale. Provide a scale baron Sheet 2 to accompany the scale text description (1"=100').
5. [14-302(B), 10.4] Yards. Review and revise the following:
a. The setback requirements noted on the plat do not align with the current County Ordinances. Revise the
yards/setbacks to align with the rural area regulations, as provided in Sec. 10.4 of Chapter 18.
b. Demonstrate the rear yard setbacks for proposed Lot 1 on the plat map. (Note: Per the proposed lot shape, this
lot appears to have two rear yards.)
6. [14-312] Existing building locations. Provide on the plat, distance measurements between the edges of existing buildings
(i.e. the house and shed) and the proposed property line. (Note: Per Sec. 4.11.2(b) of Chapter 18, accessory structures, as
defined in the 4.11.2(c) are not permitted any closer than six (6) feet to the side or rear property lines.)
7. [14-302(A)(9)] Building sites. Revise the note regarding building sites to instead read, "Residue TMP 93-44D and Lot 1
each contain a building site that complies with Sec. 4.2.1 of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance." It is necessary that
this note acknowledge and confirm that the revised parcel — Residue TMP 93-44D — meets this requirement.
8. [Advisory Comment] Similarly, when referring to the amended parcel TMP 93-44D in the notes, or on the plat map, please
use "Residue TMP 93-44D" to distinguish between the current lot (TMP 93-44D) and the proposed lot (Residue TMP 93-
44D). It tends to be confusing otherwise.
9. [ 14-302(A)(11)] Instrument reference. The deed book and page reference noted on the plat, confirming the creation of the
subject property and its boundaries, appears to be for a different lot — TMP 94-17 instead of TMP 93-44D (see attached).
This may be due to a mistake on the County GIS portal. Please review and revise to provide an instrument which confirms
the creation of the entire subject property as it exists today.
10. [14-303(A)] Statement of consent. The statement of consent references a different parcel ID. Please revise.
11. [14-302(A)(10)] Development rights. Include a note on the plat confirming the number of development rights Residue TMP
93-44D will be retaining with this subdivision plat.
12. [ 14-303(C)] Boundary lines. Confirm the length of the northernmost edge of TMP 93-44D. The plat currently denotes two
lengths for this boundary line — 401.90' and 408.80'. Which one is correct?
13. [14-302(A)(7)] Departing lot lines. Show the departing lot line for abutting parcel TMP 94-44C on the plat.
14. [14-303(S)] Control points. Include on the plat map at least four (4) control points, evenly distributed across the property
and located at survey property corners.
15. [14-302(B)] North arrow. If true north is used, provide the method of determination. (Note: In comparison with Albemarle
County GIS, the parcel line representation does not appear to align with the north arrow given.)
16. [Advisory Comment] Notes. Consider numbering each note for easy reference through the review process and in future
references to notes on this plat.
17. [14-302(B)(1)] Resubmission. Reminder that revised plats must include the original date of drawing as well as a date of last
revision.
18. [14-309, 14-310, 14-416] Health Director approval. The Health Director will need to approve individual private wells and
onsite sewage systems before the final plat can be approved.
19. [ 14-212(C), 14-316] Access. VDOT will need to approve the new driveway entrance onto State Route 729 before approval
of the final plat can be granted.
20. [14-308.1] Groundwater assessment. The required groundwater assessment for this applications has been completed. Please
see the attached report.
In accordance with the provisions of Z.O. 14-229 of the County Code, if the applicant fails to submit a revised plat to address all
of the requirements within six (6) months after the date of this letter, the application shall be deemed to have been voluntarily
withdrawn by the applicant.
Please contact Mariah Gleason in the Planning Division by using m leg ason(&albemarle.org or 434-296-5832 ext. 3097 for
further information.
if
ACM $92 P00345
THIS DEED, made this 8th day of April, 1988, by and
between CHAN= S. DURR$R, OR. and LAUM Be DURRER, husband and
wife, parties of the first part, hereinafter referred to as
Grantors, and CLIrZW L. BUTTHER and OREM D. bt17 MBRop husband
and wife# parties of the second part, hereinafter referred to as
Grantees, whose address is 802 Rockland Avenue, Charlottesville,
Virginia, 22901, Tims A. MARTIN# dn., Trustee, and SLI=Aam d.
SNE MU # bondholder, parties of the third part,
N'ITNB88STN I
That for and in consideration of $1,775.00, cash in
hand paid, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledges, the Gran..
tors do hereby O WT, BARGAIN AND BBLL )WD CONM with GBNERAL
wARRANTy and SNGLTBH CoVENANTB or TITLE unto the Grantees, as
tenants by the entirety with full rights of'survivorship as at
coaaon law, and not as .tenants lu common p all that certain lot or
Parcel of JM4 situated on State Route 7.29' in Albemarle County,
Virginia, containing 2.002 acres; more or less, sham by a plat
thereof grade by Frank A. Gregg, C.L.B., dated November, 1979, here
to attached and recorded as a part of this deed, being a portion
of the property conveyed to the Grantors by deed of Elisabeth $.
Sweeney and hunband, dated October 19, 1979, of record in the
Clerk's office of the Circuit Court for said County in O. S. 602,
page 6, the land hereby conveyed being conveyed subject to the
natters shown on said plate
Said property is bound by the lien of a deed of
trust from the Grantors herein to Lewis A.' Martin, d'r. , Trustee,
4)M PL Q4PM dated October 190 1979, of record in said Clerk's Office in D. 9,
D" C. CARMS
DOUIPACCNM 683, page lA, securing a debt therein described to Blisabeth 9.
uA6�anarrsr�smu�►
w Swreney, who is willing that the lien thereof be released as to
a
u
.
o F6 Com
ftectma
MURMURSim
W 692 PAI034l
the property hereinabove described and conveyed. In consideration
Of $1400, the said 'Trustee, by and with the consent and at the
direction of Elisabeth D. aMeeney, Bondholder# as evidenced by
her signature hereto+ dcas hereby ULEA9e "D C0t11plAM, GPANT AND
Cot M With 5MIAL NARPAIM OF TITM unto said Grantees, the 2.00
acres hereinabave described and conveyed, but the lion of said
deed of trust shall not in any. other way be hereby affected as to
said debt or as to the remainder of the land thereby conwya►d and
Inot hereby released.
11I?l M the following Signatures and seals:
Charles R. Durrer, Bre
• 1 9 A •
LeMss A: 1�a tif, Jr., Trustezv
.4 e
(SM
vvTJjEjt1k lie ateener.,�
alp VIfIMIA ` ' • etih.
w�
T or Ai�B#1i11lTi, to -wit$
The forevoing instrument was acknc' l • v 1 � .
day of April, 1910, by Charles aq puss p►w
S. Durres. MY oaw16810a expire � � •' 'id ,r p
alp VISMIA
WT or ]lLA , to -wit 1
The forevoing instrument was acknowledged before m•
e dale of April, 19800 by LWis A* Martin, at*, Estee.
Commission expires /
Id x
. _ - .... . ... . • --
COUNTY PLANNING C"ISSION BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CERTIFICATION
e4pf 6 ' 3 This is a correct
�•' and accurate plat.
Chasse Des gnats Age
!Z.
Date ' Date
OWNER'S APPROVAL: This division is wade The foregoing instrument was acknow-
with the free consent of the undersigned ledged before we this Si A
owner, propri t a or trustees. 01979. My cowmis ion
s
j
Notary
gONINi�A•1
• PLAT lMGWMG
9.00E AC. A DIVISION OF 12 E %-T16J5
UDCATED bN THE W. SIDE OST�7E9 AND 9 ,OP ROUTE S3 ElN•RT
• TAX MAP 94 PARCEL 17
GG":1 %j0W AL4198ARL6 OOWWS •'MISM NOR Oft
FRANK A. !M6
• a
44
691 0341
i
Is do" was pmaloted and with cortiricato annexed
ad*ittod to rroord on at cloak p.
- sr,►�s �X � o
LOCAL TAX
TMANIM m a� �r. tURMLL. ctiIRP
CLENK • a rn
FLAT
OPANWRII TAX A-0 j2o� JZL
.. _ TOTS � � b6
•
Tier II Groundwater Assessment Site Map 70 140 210Feet
APP#: SUB 2019-00127 O Subject Parcel O LUSTs
TMP: 09300-00-00-044DO O Known Water Wells 0 Superfund Sites r
�� ❑Map Created by CDD on: 08/22/2019 ` Water Protection Landfills
***Aerial Imagery from Y2018*** ', Ordinance Buffers
2
*Hydrogeologic Units Defined
Taken from the 1213012003 Albemarle County Hydrogeologic Assessment Phase II —
Groundwater Availability and Sensitivity Assessment with Proposed Groundwater Assessment
Standards. Prepared by ENSAT Corporation, Culpeper, VA.
The process of investigating groundwater availability at the County -wide scale involved identifying distinct
hydrogeologic units and comparing the units based on groundwater availability characteristics for which data
could be obtained. Each hydrogeologic unit shares some common characteristics with regard to geology,
soils, and topography, although there is quite a bit of variability within each unit.
Nine hydrogeologic units were identified across the County, as follows, and as shown on the Albemarle
County Hydrogeologic Unit Map (Figure 2).
2.
Figure 2 - Albemarle County Hydrogeologic Unit Map
Blue Ridge West-IW: This unit lies primarily
on the steep eastern slopes of the Blue Ridge
Mountains and is dominated by the Myersville
and Parker Soils, and to a lesser extent the
Chester. Slopes range from 2-60%. These soils
are residual in nature. The Myersville soils are
derived from weathered volcanic metamorphic
rocks (greenstone) and Parker and Chester soil
series are derived from weathered granite and
granite gneiss. These soils are considered to be
relatively deep and well drained.
Blue Ridge East-IE: The Blue Ridge East unit
overlies volcanic greenstone rock and represents
the eastern limb of the Blue Ridge Anticlinorium.
The area is characterized by the presence of a
prominent ridge and trends generally northeast
within the otherwise rolling piedmont landscape.
Portions of this ridge are known locally as Green
Mountain, Carters Mountain, and the Southwest
Mountains. This area is dominated by the Rabun
and Myersville soils and to a lesser extent, the
Catoctin. The Rabun soil series is deep and well
drained and like the Myersville soil series is
formed from weathered greenstone. The
Catoctin soil series is considered to be
moderately deep and well drained and is also
formed from weathered greenstone.
Colluvial Fans -II: The Colluvial Fan unit lies at
the base of the eastern slopes of the Blue Ridge
Mountain and is characterized by relatively steep
drainage swales that extend to more gradual sloping conditions. The area includes a series of
intermittent drainages that include ephemeral drainage ways. Many of the intermittent drainages
become perennial streams as this area includes stream bottom valleys. A significant portion of the unit
area consists of transported soils including the Braddock and Thurmont. These soils are formed in
colluvial and alluvial materials found on colluvial fans and terraces and are the product of weathered
granite, granodiorite, granite gneiss, and greenstone. Both of these soil series are deep and well
drained with slopes ranging from 2-25%. Residual soils including the Hayesville and the Chester are
also abundant. These soils are also deep and well drained and are formed on upland slopes from
weathered products of granite and granite gneiss. Slopes of these soils typically range from 2-45%.
Bedrock geology consists largely of metagranitic rock of the Blue Ridge Basement Complex and
metasedimentary, metaconglomerate and phyllite of the Swift Run Formation. The accumulation of
transported soils (colluvial and alluvial) can form "cappings" over residual soils and parent material,
which can add to the overall thickness of the overburden.
4. Piedmont Foothills -III: The Piedmont Foothills unit is characterized by rolling upland to relatively
steep topography. Soils within this area dominated by the Hayesville, Ashe and Chester soil series
which are moderately deep to deep, and generally well drained. These soils are found on the piedmont
upland and foothills of the Blue Ridge Mountain on slopes ranging from 2-45%. These soils are formed
3
from weathered granites and meta -granites of the Blue Ridge Basement complex. The Piedmont
Foothills area is bifurcated by Hydrogeologic Unit IV (Lynchburg).
Lynchburg -IV: The Lynchburg unit is characterized by a relatively narrow band that trends in a
northeast direction and includes a relatively long segment of the Mechums River valley. Soils within this
unit are dominated by the Hazel and to a lesser extent by the Elioak and Glenelg soils. The Hazel soil
series are moderately deep and well drained and are formed in the weathered products of
metagraywacke sandstone and mica schist. Hazel soils lie on uplands and their slopes range from 7-
45%. The Elioak soil series are deep and well drained and are formed in the products of weathered
micaeous metamorphic rock. Slopes of the Elioak range from 2-25%. The Glenelg soils are also deep
and well drained and are formed in the weathered products of quartz mica schist. Slopes of the Glenelg
range from 2-45%. The area is underlain primarily by the Lynchburg Formation and/or the Mechums
River Formation which consists largely of metagraywacke, meta sandstone, and graphitic schist.
Ragged Mountain-V: The Ragged Mountain unit is characterized by mountainous terrain located in the
southwestern portion of the County and is underlain by the metagranitic rocks of the Blue Ridge
Basement Complex. The soils in the area are dominated by the Chester, Hayesville, Ashe, and Parker
soil series. These soils are derived from weathered granite and granite gneiss and are deep and
excessively well drained. These soils range in slope from 2-45% with some slopes up to 60 percent in
the Parker soils.
Candler -VI: The Candler unit is underlain primarily by the Candler formation. Bedrock geology includes
phyllites and to a lesser degree laminated metasiltstone. Soils underlying the unit area are dominated
by the Manteo and Nason series. Manteo soils are shallow and somewhat excessively drained. The
Manteo soils are formed in the weathered products of sericitic schist/phyllite on uplands and range in
slope from 2-45%. The Nason soil series are deep and well drained and are also formed in the
weathered products of sericitic schist/phyllite. The Nason soils are formed on uplands and range in
slope from 2-25%.
Newark Basin-VII: The Newark Basin unit is characterized by low relief topography, which exists over
Mesozoic basin geology. The unit is underlain by the Newark Supergroup which consists of sandstones,
siltstones, and shales. Soils within this area are dominated by the Totier, Rapidan, and Penn series.
The Totier soil series are deep and well drained and are formed from weathered Triassic red shale.
These soils are found on uplands and range in slope from 2-15% deep to moderately deep and well
drained. Slopes range from 2-25%.
The Rapidan soil series are also deep and well drained and are formed in weathered products of Triassic
conglomerate. The Rapidan, like the Totier, are found on uplands and range in slope from 2-25%. The
Penn series are moderately deep and well drained and are formed from the weathered products of
Triassic red shale. The Newark Basin hydrogeologic unit includes the Scottsville Basin located in the
southern portion of the County and much smaller area of the Barboursville Basin located in the northern
portion of the County.
9. Piedmont Proper-VIII: The Piedmont Proper unit is characterized by gently rolling piedmont
topography. The bedrock geology underlying the unit is mapped as Metagraywacke, quartoze schist,
and melange. Soils in the unit area are dominated by the Nason and the Manteo in nearly equal
percentages. Although these same soils also dominated the Candler unit, it should be noted that the
Manteo soils were nearly twice as prevalent as compared to the Nason. Manteo soils are shallow and
somewhat excessively drained. The Manteo soils are formed in the weathered products of sericitic
schists/phyllites on uplands and range in slope from 2-45%. The Nason soil series are deep and well
drained and are also formed in the weathered products of sericitic schist. The Nason soils are formed
on uplands and range in slope from 2-25%.
10. Barboursville -IX: This unit exists in only a small portion of the County at the area where Route 20
enters Orange County. Evidently this hydrogeologic unit was small enough that it did not factor into the
ENSAT report and therefore does not have a description like the other units. You can see an unlabeled
delineation of this unit in the map (Figure 2) along the northern County boundary near the right-hand
side.
M