The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutZMA201800018 Resubmittal 2019-09-18SHIMP ENGINEERING, P.C. Design Focused Engineering September 16, 2019 Megan Nedostup County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 RE: ZMA2018-018 + SP2018-023 Resubmit #1 Dear Ms. Nedostup, Please find the first resubmittal application for ZMA2018-018 and SP2018-023 included with this transmittal letter. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this application. Regards, Kelsey Schlein Kelsey@shimp-engineering 1 (434)227-5140 Copy: Justin(&,,shimp-en ineering com ATTACHMENTS: Revised Application Plan Revised Narrative Response Letter Revised Central Sewer Request 912 E. High St. Charlottesville, VA 22902 1434.227.5140 1 shimp-engineering.com SHIMP ENGINEERING, P.C. Design Focused Engineering September 16, 2019 Megan Nedostup County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 RE: Response Letter #1 for ZMA2018-018 & SP2018-023 River's Edge Dear Ms. Nedostup, Thank you for your review of the rezoning and special use permit requests for River's Edge. This letter contains responses to County comments dated February 1, 2019. Our responses are as follows: Zoning Map Amendment Comments: 1. Responses to General Application Comments, are attached 2. Responses to Megan Nedostup & Lea Brumfield, Planning/Zoning, are attached 3. Responses to Margaret Maliszewski, Architectural Review Board, are attached 4. Responses to Frank Pohl, Engineering, are attached 5. Responses to Adam Moore (Virginia Department of Transportation), Transportation, are attached 6. Responses to Richard Nelson, Albemarle County Service Authority, are attached 7. Responses to Shawn Maddox, Fire/Rescue, are attached 8. Responses to David Hannah, Natural Resources Management, are attached Special Use Permit Comments: 1. Responses to Planning Staff, are attached 2. Responses to Frank Pohl, Engineering, are attached Zoning May Amendment Comments General Application Comments 1. The proposed density of 65 maximum units is above the Comprehensive Plan recommendation for density. A maximum density of 6 dwelling units per acre are recommended under the comprehensive plan designation of Neighborhood Density Residential. Excluding the land under the Water Protection Ordinance stream buffer, flood plain, and steep slopes, the maximum density would equate to 50 dwelling units. Revise the application to meet the comp plan recommendations for density. RESPONSE: On behalf of the applicant, we propose fifty (50) size restricted primary units and fifty (50) size restricted secondary units. The proposed primary units are restricted to a maximum of 1,000 square feet and the secondary units are restricted to a maximum of 600 square feet. hi total, we propose a maximum of 80,000 square feet of residential living area. If the property were to be developed with single family detached homes constructed to size standards that are consistent with today's new construction market, approximately 2,500 square feet, the property could have 125,000 square feet of residential living area. Additionally, each single family detached residence could have an accessory apartment that could be up to 35% of 912 E. High St. Charlottesville, VA 22902 1434.227.5140 1 shimp-engineering.com the gross area of the primary residential structure. Collectively, there could be 100 dwelling units on the property, comprised of 50 single family detached units and 50 accessory dwelling units. We contend that the impact of 100 size restricted primary and secondary units is no greater than the impact of 50 single family detached dwelling units and 50 accessory apartments. The intent of a PRD is to "encourage sensitivity toward the natural characteristics of the site and toward impact on the surrounding area in land development... [provide] for flexibility and variety of development for residential purposes and uses ancillary thereto' (Section 19.1). The proposed residential development will consist of size restricted units that will be constructed in a manner that is "light" on the land. Construction techniques such as pier foundations are proposed to avoid mass grading at the home sites. The smaller units can more seamlessly be incorporated into the site than larger units with concrete pads and greater overall floor area. 2. A statement should be provided as to how the proposal specifically addresses impacts to school, parks, transportation, and safety (police and fire). RESPONSE: Comment received. The narrative has been revised to specifically address impacts to schools, parks, transportation, and safety. It is recommended that the current residents of the rental units be notified of the request. A community meeting should take place directly with them if they have not been notified to date. RESPONSE: Thank you for this recommendation. A meeting for existing residents has not been scheduled to date, however it is prudent to host a neighborhood meeting prior to the application moving forward to the Board of Supervisors. We will notify Staff of the date and time of this meeting once it is scheduled. Planning/Zoning Megan Nedostup — Principal Planner Lea Brumfield — Senior Planner 1. Many of the requirements to be shown on the application plan for PRD per Section 33.18(B) have not been provided. Specifically, 33.18(B)(3-8) and (11-12). Provide the minimum requirements for the application plan, including showing where the central system/pump station will be located. The central system was only shown on the materials for the request for the system and should be incorporated into the rezoning application. RESPONSE: The application plan has been revised to be more comprehensive in scope and more accurately reflect requirements of the Ordinance. Please refer to sheet 7 for more details. 2. Show more clearly the environmental features including the flood plain, steep slopes, and water protection buffer on the plan and not separate as shown on the "Comparative Maps" sheet. These features should be compiled on one overall sheet together. The "Existing Conditions" sheet is not clearly labeled and is confusing on which features are which and does not show the steep slopes. Overall the plan sheets are difficult to read and interpret and the scale should be enlarged or larger sheets should be provided. RESPONSE: Noted. Sheet 4 of the existing conditions has been updated to show the steep slopes, floodplain, and water protection buffer. Additionally, the format of the sheets has been revised for legibility. The plan remains on I Ix17, but if larger sheets are required for plan review we can reformat the application to be on 24x36. 3. The existing conditions sheets does not show the basketball/asphalt play court that is on site. Show all existing conditions, facilities, and units. RESPONSE: Noted. Sheet 4 has been updated to show the basketball/asphalt court. 912 E. High St. Charlottesville, VA 22902 1434.227.5140 1 shimp-engineering.com 4. Conceptual grading is only shown for the entrance road, will there be additional grading needed for the units or the road/access further into the site? If so, show the conceptual grading for the site. RESPONSE: The grading plan has been revised to be more comprehensive in scope. Mass grading will be limited to roadways, where necessary, and parking areas. Grading is expected to be limited in residential area. Please find conceptual grading for the site and road on sheets 8-13. 5. Indicate the type of street proposed or if it is an accessway only. RESPONSE: A private street is proposed. 6. Accurately depict the street/accessway sections to show the current conditions on site and how the grading will occur to widen the access. Additionally, address whether construction of the road will require grading in the 100-year floodplain. This may be addressed by showing a plan of the proposed road and all grading activities imposed over a plan of the 100-year floodplain. RESPONSE: The proposed road will require grading to widen the access. No grading activities will occur in the floodplain as defined by the BFE. Additional data or mapping will be provided during site plan review to demonstrate. Please refer to sheet 5 for land use dedications on the site. 7. A second point of access is required. See Fire/Rescue comments below. RESPONSE: The units will be sprinkled. It is our understanding if the units are sprinkled a second point of access may not be required. The majority of the open space depicted on the plan is located on preserved slopes or within the 100-year floodplain. Between the two parcels, the site totals 32.52 acres of land. The plan devotes 6.12 acres to the development area, with the remainder, 26.4 acres, devoted to open space. Of this total area devoted to green space, 23.7 acres are located on preserved slopes or within the 100- year floodplain. Per Section 18-4.7(c)(3) of the County Code, no more than 80% of the required minimum open space (25% of the total acreage) may be located on preserved slopes or within the 100-year floodplain. The required minimum open space is 1.62 acres. 1.79 acres is provided, meeting the minimum. However, sheet 4 of the Zoning Map Amendment Application Plan lists use of parcel 32-5A as "single family." Previous discussions about this parcel noted that the single-family dwellings on parcel 32-5A might be preserved and continued to be used as residential structures. This would remove that portion of the site from the open space provided, and the minimum open space not located on preserved slopes or within the 100-year floodplain would not be met. RESPONSE: The brick structure, near the entrance of the property, will be preserved but will be repurposed from a single family dwelling to an amenity space, similar to a community "clubhouse." This amenity space will be incorporated into the open space and recreational requirements. Minimum open space requirements for areas not on preserved slopes or within the 100-year floodplain will be met. 9. Building sites, including areas disturbed in the erection of buildings, may not encroach onto the preserved slopes or into the floodplain. As currently depicted, the building sites are not shown. Depict conceptual building sites to demonstrate the feasibility of the number of dwelling units on the described Development Area. RESPONSE: Proposed building sites and areas disturbed for development will not encroach onto the preserved slopes or into the floodplain. We have provided a conceptual design plan to 912 E. High St. Charlottesville, VA 22902 1434.227.5140 1 shimp-engineering.com demonstrate how the residential development will be cognizant of sensitive environmental features. Please refer to sheet 5 (land use) and sheet 20 (concept plan). 10. Required recreational areas per 4.16 are not shown on the plan. Demonstrate on the plan potential locations for a minimum of a 2,000 square foot fenced tot lot per 4.16.2. The tot lot may include alternative play equipment, and may demonstrate "potential" locations, but the plan must demonstrate the potential to devote 2,000 square feet to the lot in addition to the proposed building sites. Label on the plan the open space dedicated to satisfy the requirements of 19.6. RESPONSE: Please refer to sheet 5 for areas dedicated to open space and a possible location for a tot lot. During our meeting with Staff on August 29, 2019 we discussed how linear recreational facilities along the primitive trails could be appropriate for this site, as long as at least one tot lot is provided on the property. Linear recreational facilities, such as "fit -trail" stations, could be sufficient for the community and take advantage of linear space along the trail network. 11. Show which, if any, of the houses currently existing will be removed or remain. Previous discussions indicated some of the houses may remain, either for continued single family use or for a clubhouse for the rental units. This may impact the maximum allowable density and open space requirements. RESPONSE: Please refer to sheet 7 (land use) and 8 (circulation) for the one existing structure that will remain, and is proposed to be adapted to an amenity use for the neighborhood. 12. The Affordable Housing Policy of the Comprehensive Plan recommends that 15% of housing be affordable. Will affordable units be provided? Please address this policy. RESPONSE: At this time a commitment to affordable housing is not contained in the application plan. 13 The Places29 Master Plan shows a multiple trails through these properties. One that wraps around the properties and another multi -use trail along Route 29 frontage. Indicate whether or not a trail will be provided, show the trail, and indicate the type of trail. Also, state whether it will be dedicated to the County for public use. Currently there is a note referencing paths, but it is not clear where these paths are located or the type of path proposed. RESPONSE: Sheet 6 has been updated with the circulation on the site. There will be a network of primitive trails throughout the property, which will be private. As per discussions during a 912 E. High St. Charlottesville, VA 22902 1434.227.5140 1 shimp-engineering.com meeting with staff on August 29, 2019, a trail on the north side of the parcel would be likely inaccessible with the present steep slopes, and will not have to be provided. The existing asphalt road will be adapted to serve as a paved pedestrian path, which will lead to a pedestrian bridge across Flat Branch into TMP 32-22K1. The repurposing of the paved road to a pedestrian use and the provision of the pedestrian bridge will achieve the multi -modal connectivity intent of the multi -use path as shown on the Places29 Master Plan but will minimize, and effectively eliminate, any extensive grading required to install a multi -use path adjacent to Route 29. 14. A forested buffer is recommended in the Places29 Master Plan at a minimum of 50' along Route 29. This is shown the Frontage Conditions Map, and detailed information is outlined in Chapter 7. Provide the buffer as recommended in the Plan. RESPONSE: Comment received. Please refer to sheet 5 (land use) to find the minimum 50' forested buffer along Route 29. The buffer is only intended to be disturbed for entrance improvements to ensure safe access to the site. 15. The narrative states that the units will not be subdivided, but rented. How will this be accomplished? RESPONSE: The property will not be subdivided. A proffer will be included with this application plan to ensure this. Please refer to the "proffer narrative" included with this resubmittal. The proffer narrative outlines the commitments the applicant is willing to make to provide assurance that the property will develop as described in the application narrative and in the application plan. We're hoping to continue to work with staff to develop the draft proffer statement prior to the planning commission. At this time a narrative is provided so Staff is aware of the applicant's intentions and can hopefully receive feedback regarding additional recommended proffers or revisions to the provided commitments in the narrative. 16. Staff has concerns about the future of the property if it is rezoned and subdivision. The road/accessway would not meet standards for a street and lots could be developed within the buffers. A commitment should be made that a future subdivision would not be permitted due to the site not being able to support that type of development as proposed. RESPONSE: The property will not be subdivided. A proffer will be included with this application plan to ensure this. 17. The Natural Resources Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan has the following objective regarding Parks and Green Systems and stream corridors as identified on the Land Use map. These 912 E. High St. Charlottesville, VA 22902 1434.227.5140 1 shimp-engineering.com properties contain a large portion of Parks and Green systems that should be designated on the plan as conservation area. In addition, the uses permitted in the conservation area should be limited to trails, utilities if no reasonable alternative exists, stream restoration, and the access road, as the section of this river is within an impaired segment as noted by the Natural Resources Manager, see comments below. Strategy4h: Preserve existing vegetation in areas shown as Parks and Green Systems on Development Area Master Plans. Each Development Area Master Plan describes the importance of preserving stream corridors and other environmentally sensitive areas. These places are especially important to biodiversity as are other areas shown as Parks and Green Systems in the Master Plan maps. The Neighborhood Model princi- ples, found in the Development Areas Chapter, describe the importance of parks, recreational amenities, and open space in creating and maintain high quality neighborhoods. Wooded areas, ri- parian areas, and undeveloped well -vegetated land connecting these areas helps retain habitat corridors. RESPONSE: Comment received. Please see the land use bubble map on sheet 5 to note the proposed conservation areas. Architectural Review Board Margaret Maliszewski — Chief of Planning, Resource Management Single-family detached residences do not require ARB review. The Places 29 master plan designates the subject parcel for "forested buffer frontage". This buffer has a 50' minimum depth and is composed of naturally arranged trees and a dense understory of shrubs. Maintaining the existing wooded area, and in particular its scale, character and density, would maintain an appropriate appearance on the Entrance Corridor. RESPONSE: The 50' forested buffer is intended to be remain and is only to be disturbed for entrance improvements. Please refer to sheet 5 (land use) to find the minimum 50' forested buffer along Route 29. Engineering Frank Pohl County Engineer The application does not mention that road widening will result in impacts to the 100-ft stream buffer. Update the 'impacts on environmental features' section of the application to include the extent of buffer impacts (sf area), justification for these impacts, and how they are allowed under the code. If a waiver is required, please request one. RESPONSE: The application plan has been revised to include approximate square footage of stream buffer disturbance. Please reference sheet 19 of the application plan for stream buffer disturbance area. The "impacts on environmental features" section of the narrative has been revised to account for disturbance of the stream buffer. The proposed development is intended to occur on a single lot and so stream buffer disturbance for road improvements may be allowed per Sec. 17-604 (D.). We understand a mitigation plan will be required prior to commencement of any roadway improvements in the stream buffer. Transportation Adam Moore — VDOT Area Land Use Engineer 1. Will access road from Route 29 be public or private road? RESPONSE: The proposed road will be private. 912 E. High St. Charlottesville, VA 22902 1434.227.5140 1 shimp-engineering.com 2. Entrance onto Route 29 will have to meet the Access Management Design Standards for Entrances and Intersections. Please see VDOT Road Design Manual, Appendix F. RESPONSE: Comment received. At the time of site plan review and approval, we will include the proposed entrance design. We will reference VDOT Road Design Manual, Appendix F for required design standards. Albemarle County Service Authority Richard Nelson — Civil Engineer Parcel is located in the North Fork South Zone Special Rate District. Due to the demand for fire hydrants a public water main will be required. ACSA may request these units be individually metered. ACSA will be updating the connection fee language to include single family units attached and detached as 1 ERC behind a master meter, July 2019. RESPONSE: Comment received. Fire/Rescue Shawn Maddox — Assistant Fire Marshal 1. Based on the number of detached single family dwellings proposed a second emergency apparatus access will need to be provided. RESPONSE: The units will be sprinkled and so a secondary emergency access may not be required. 2. Fire Rescue does support the improvement of the existing entrance to current standards allowing for emergency vehicle access to the entire site. RESPONSE: Comment received. Natural Resources Manager David Hannah — Natural Resources Manager Water quality and river health are among my biggest concerns. A long segment of the North Fork Rivanna River is designated as impaired for recreation by Virginia DEQ (based on levels of coliform bacteria). Water bodies are listed as impaired by DEQ when they fail to meet state water quality standards. The section of the river adjacent to the subject property is within the impaired segment. The impaired segment extends both downstream from the subject property and upstream to just inside Greene County. A long segment of the North Fork Rivanna River upstream of the subject property is impaired for aquatic life (based on sampling of benthic macroinvertebrates). The impaired segment extends from just inside Greene County to roughly 2000' upstream of Route 29. An unnamed tributary of Flat Branch is also impaired for aquatic life, with Flat Branch emptying into the North Fork Rivanna River just downstream of the subject property. Because of water quality and river health issues in this area of the county, Virginia DEQ initiated a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) process in 2018 for the North Fork Rivanna River and many of its tributaries. 912 E. High St. Charlottesville, VA 22902 1434.227.5140 1 shimp-engineering.com Given the shape of the property, it is virtually "surrounded" by the North Fork Rivanna River. Much of the property is within the Preserved Slopes and WPO Stream Buffer overlays. Even if all rules and regulations at all levels (county, state, federal) are followed, there will be impacts to water quality and other natural resources. According to aerial photography, most of the property appears to be wooded. Retaining as much vegetation on the entirety of the site as possible, particularly woody vegetation, will help minimize the impacts of development to the natural resources. The subject property lies within a Conservation Focus Area - the Rivanna River Corridor - identified in the recently completed Biodiversity Action Plan for Albemarle County (see Map 4 of the plan). The plan was endorsed by the Board of Supervisors at a work session on 7/5/18. The map of Conservation Focus Areas is on schedule to be incorporated in the County's Comprehensive Plan by mid -year. The Conservation Focus Areas were identified as having significant biodiversity resources and high conservation value. In the case of the Rivanna River Corridor, there is habitat connectivity throughout much of the focus area. Impacts to natural resources in the Conservation Focus Areas should be minimized and avoided whenever possible. RESPONSE: Thank you for these detailed comments about the state of the environmentally sensitive features on and in close proximity of this site. These features contribute to the unique opportunity to have a residential community with strong ties to the natural environment while being located in the development areas and adjacent to a principal arterial. The project proposal includes small residential units with ample open space and recreational facilities. Please refer to the project narrative for a more in-depth description of the project proposal and please refer to the proffer narrative for descriptions of the commitments the applicant intends to make to ensure the property develops in a manner consistent with the application materials. The residential units are proposed as size restricted, and are not to exceed to 1,000 SF. These small footprints allow for the units to interact lightly with the sensitive topographic features on the property. Additionally, smaller footprints allow for the units to be placed between existing mature trees on the property which are critical for air and water quality, as well as temperature control on the site. The project proposes minimal disturbance of the 100' WPO buffer to allow for road widening, to allow for safe and reasonable access for future residents and when necessary, emergency vehicles. Ample recreational opportunities will be provided on site in the form of primitive paths. These paths will allow residents to explore the site and enjoy the unique environmental features of the property. The Biodiversity Action Plan was recently adopted by the Board of Supervisors and incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan. We are receptive to any additional feedback on how this project can achieve consistencies with this newly adopted section of the Comprehensive Plan. Special Use Permit Comments Planning 1. Intent of Steep Slopes Overlay District: When evaluating the appropriateness of the proposed disturbance of preserved steep slopes in isolation (as opposed to evaluating it in combination with other elements of the overall proposed development), Staff has some concerns relative to the "purpose and intent" as "their disturbance should be subject to appropriate consideration and care in their design and construction in order to protect the integrity of the steep slope areas, protect downstream lands and waterways from the adverse effects of the unregulated disturbance of steep slopes, including the rapid or large- 912 E. High St. Charlottesville, VA 22902 1434.227.5140 1 shimp-engineering.com scale movement of soil and rock, or both, excessive stormwater runoff, the degradation of surface water, and to enhance and preserve the character and beauty of the steep slopes in the development areas of the county. " It has not been demonstrated that "appropriate consideration and care" has been given in regards to important details such as site grading or re -grading, stormwater management, and mitigation efforts. Specifically, concern remains with regards to the protection of the waterway and excessive stormwater runoff. RESPONSE: The application plan has been revised to provide a more detailed conceptual grading plan for the on -site roadway and the residential areas. We are willing to work with Staff, prior to public hearing, to explore commitments to ensure appropriate consideration and care are given in regards to grading, stormwater management, and mitigation efforts. 2. Additional information should be provided to articulate site -specific and project -specific details, in order for Staff to undertake a complete evaluation of the proposal's impacts and appropriateness. This should include information (in narrative and graphic format) to show, describe, quantify, and/or otherwise detail the proposed disturbance of preserved steep slopes as well as any/all associated proposed mitigation practices. RESPONSE: The steep slopes exhibit has been revised to show proposed disturbance. This exhibit is included on sheet 18 of the Application Plan. The "impacts to environmental features" section of the narrative has been revised to provide an overview of the anticipated disturbance to environmentally sensitive features. Grading and stormwater management issues which will be dealt with in full detail on the WPONSMP Plan may substantially affect the special use permit proposal. Provide conceptual stormwater, see Engineering comments below. RESPONSE: Conceptual stormwater design is now included on sheets 14-17 of the Application Plan. 4. Provide additional information (in narrative and graphic format) to identify any/all associated proposed practices to mitigate any disturbance of preserved steep slopes, either through landscaping, stormwater management best practices, low impact development, orother materials or methods. RESPONSE: The land use table on sheet 5 outlines the permitted uses on various portions of the property. A significant portion of the property, more than 70% will remain in open space. This area encompasses sensitive environmental features, such as the majority of preserved slopes on the site. The majority of areas within open space will not be disturbed, leaving intact much of the existing vegetation. We are willing to continue working with Staff to explore mitigation measures and low impact development alternatives prior to public hearing. Consideration should be given to developing and submitting a "conceptual plan" document specifically for the SP application, which could address these issues related to the proposed disturbance of preserved steep slopes at the same level and detail as a site plan, landscape plan, or WPO plan, but which would be evaluated separately from the rezoning application plan. RESPONSE: Further detail about grading is included in the Application Plan and additionally, a more detailed conceptual plan is included in the Application Plan. Engineering Frank Pohl — County Engineer 912 E. High St. Charlottesville, VA 22902 1434.227.5140 1 shimp-engineering.com Applicant has not submitted a waiver request narrative as required in 18-4.2.5.a.1. How will the following be addressed: rapid and/or large-scale movement of soil and rock, excessive stormwater run-off, siltation of natural and man-made bodies of water, loss of aesthetic resources, and, in the event of septic system failure, a greater travel distance of septic effluent (collectively referred to as the "public health, safety, and welfare factors") that might otherwise result from the disturbance of critical slopes? RESPONSE: It is our understanding a waiver may not be applicable to the disturbance of slopes, as we have applied for a special use permit request for this disturbance. We are open to considering any conditions Staff may propose to assure any impacts from slopes disturbance are adequately mitigated. Alternatively, we are willing to propose language for conditions, if that is Staff s desire. 2. Provide accurate profile and cross sections of proposed road improvements at 50-ft intervals, including proposed tie-in grading and cut/fill. The existing driveway is narrow and side slopes are very steep (up to what appears to be 70% based on County GIS). Cross sections provided on Sheet 7 are somewhat deceiving as they do not accurately reflect existing conditions. Please show contours from the top to bottom of slope on the Steep Slope Disturbance exhibit. RESPONSE: Comment received. Please refer to sheets 9-13 and 18 for detailed grading of the slopes, as well as the areas of disturbance. 3. Conceptual stormwater management facilities are not shown on the application as required by the County Special Use Permit Checklist. Please provide locations of conceptual SWM facilities. RESPONSE: Please see sheets 14-17 of the application plan for locations of conceptual SWM facilities. If you have any questions or concerns about these revisions, please feel free to contact me at Kelsey(a,shimp-en ing eering corn or by phone at 434-227-5140. Regards, Kelsey Schlein Planner Shimp Engineering, P.C. 912 E. High St. Charlottesville, VA 22902 1434.227.5140 1 shimp-engineering.com SHIMP ENGINEERING, P.C. Design Focused Engineering ZMA2018-018 & SP2018-023 River's Edge Application Narrative Submitted: December 17, 2018 Revised: September 16, 2019 Property Overview: ACREAGE EXISTING COMP PLAN ZONING DESIGNATION Parcel SA 4.81 RA Neighborhood Density (3-6) Parcel5A-1 27.71 RA Neighborhood Density (3-6) TOTAL: 32.52 Project Proposal: Rivers Edge Holdings LLC and Rivers Edge Associates LLC (collectively, the "applicant") are the owners of property located in Albemarle County, Virginia (the "County") designated on County Tax Maps as parcels 03200-00-00-005A and 03200-00-00-005A1 (collectively "the property"). The property is approximately 32.52 acres in the aggregate and is located approximately 1,000 linear feet north of the intersection of Lewis and Clark Dr. and U.S. Route 29 and just south of the National Ground Intelligence Center (NGIC) within the Hollymead Community, a designated Growth Area within Albemarle County. The applicant requests to rezone the property from Rural Areas to Planned Residential Development (PRD) to allow for a maximum of fifty (50) primary residential units limited to a maximum of 1,000 square feet and fifty (50) secondary residential units limited to a maximum of 600 square feet for a total of 80,000 square feet of interior residential living area. The property is located at the North Fork of the Rivanna River, at a "horseshoe bend" in the River. The natural features of this property, notably the proximity to and views of the Rivanna River and the mature vegetation on the property, coupled with the direct adjacency of the property to Route 29 and close proximity to major employment centers at the National Ground Intelligence Center and the University of Virginia Research Park, create a unique opportunity for a residential community in the development areas with direct access to rich environmental assets, transportation networks, and employment opportunities. We propose a residential community that maximizes density on developable portions of the property by proposing small pre -fabricated residential units that will be constructed as single, duplex, and triplex structures. The units are intended to interact with the existing landscape by implementing construction techniques, like pier foundations, that minimize disturbance of existing terrain. Mass grading on the site will be limited to roadway construction and parking areas. The existing roadway is proposed to be reoriented and improved to allow for easier maneuverability for future residents and safe and efficient access to the site for emergency vehicles. The parking areas will require mass grading to ensure the parking areas comply with applicable site design requirements and to ensure some units onsite are ADA accessible from the parking lot. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: 912 E. High St. Charlottesville, VA 22902 1434.227.5140 1 shimp-engineering.com The comprehensive plan identifies the developable area of the parcels as neighborhood density residential, recommending a density of three (3) to six (6) dwelling units per acre. The land area in the neighborhood density residential area, less the areas designated as environmentally sensitive, result in a maximum recommended density of 50 dwelling units on the property. These units could be constructed as 50 single family detached units with accessory apartments, equating a maximum of 100 dwelling units. We contend the impact from 100 size restricted units is not greater than the impact from 50 single family dwellings with 50 accessory apartments. The applicant proposes the conversion of the existing access way to a pedestrian path near the property entrance from Route 29. The applicant intends to provide a public access easement on this accessway and additionally, the applicant proposes to construct a pedestrian bridge across Flat Branch. Although, these pedestrian improvements do not directly align with the recommended multi -use path locations outlined in the comprehensive plan, they achieve a general multi -modal connectivity intent of the shared use path in this location. Impacts on Public Facilities & Public Infrastructure Transportation ITE's Trip Generation Manual, loth Edition estimates 56 AM peak hour trips and 67 PM peak hour trips from the development. A total of 715 weekday trips is estimated from this development using ITE code 220 (multifamily housing, low-rise). Schools The property lies within the Baker -Butler Elementary School district, Sutherland Middle School district, and Albemarle High School district. The impact on the school system from this development will determine by the type of homes built on the property. For example, the proposed small, pre -fabricated housing will be marketed towards childless households like seniors and young professionals, having minimal impact on the County school system. Albemarle County currently has 21,738 residents under the age of 18 (American Community Survey). With 40,000 households in the County, there are approximately .54 children per household in Albemarle County'. River's Edge could provide a maximum of 100 units on this property and, following the ACS approximations, there could potentially be 54 additional puppies in Albemarle County Public Schools. Due to the small footprint of these units, these homes will primarily consist of 1-bedrooms with a few 2-bedroom units. With this type of development, there are typically far fewer children than there are in a traditional single family detached home, therefore, 54 additional students is likely not an accurate estimate for this type of development. As these 1-bedroom and 2-bedroom units could be synonymous with multi -family housing, it is more accurate to estimate that the number of children per household is closer to .15 children per household. Through this estimate, the approximate number of pupils living in this development would be 15. Moreover, nearly 25% of Albemarle County children, ages 5-17, attend private schools2. In conservatively estimating that 12.5% of pupils living in River's Edge will attend private schools, then the number of students added into the Albemarle County Public School system is reduced to 13. 1 Table "DP05" ACS Demographic and Housing Estimates. U.S. Census Bureau, 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates z Table "DP05" ACS Demographic and Housing Estimates. U.S. Census Bureau, 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Parks By focusing the buildable area efficiently, River's Edge is able to allocate 70% of total acreage to open space. Open space will include a system of primitive trails, with recreational fitness facilities along these walkways. The open space surrounds the buildable area, allowing for a sufficient buffer from the Rivanna River which is a major asset of the property. A public access easement is additionally proposed for interparcel connectivity between TMP 32-22K1 and River's Edge (TMP 32-5A and TMP 32-5A1), achieving the trail connection within the Places29 North Parks and Green Systems Master Plan. There is ample on -site recreation and outdoor opportunities proposed for future residents. The County's parks may see more users with new residents on the property, but it is not anticipated for new County residents to have negative impacts on shared public space, especially in a development where convenient access to nature is proposed just outside residents' doors. Safety The property is within the response district of the Hollymead Fire Station and Hollymead Rescue Squad. The property is patrolled by the Jefferson Police District, Sector 3, Beat 9. According to American Community Survey (ACS) 2017 5-year estimates, there are approximately 2.62 per household in Albemarle County 3. As the proposed development is more similar to multifamily household characteristics than that of traditional single family detached, it is our position that the household size on this property would be 1.97 people per household, 25% smaller than the County average. With a maximum of 100 units proposed on this site, there could potentially be 197 new residents within the Hollymead Fire Station and Hollymead Rescue Squad District. Impacts to Public Water & Sewer The proposed development will connect to public water and sewer. There are minimal anticipated impacts on public facilities and infrastructure from the development. Effluent from the site will be collected in a private pump station that will ultimately connect to public sewer. Impacts on Environmental Features As a Planned Residential Development, the design of River's Edge aims to be mindful of the surrounding environmental features. Travel ways and parking will require the most disturbance and have been located strategically to minimize required mass grading into environmentally sensitive features. Currently, the entrance road into the property is insufficient and will require widening of the road to 20' with additional graded shoulders to ensure safety when moving through the site. This will result in approximately 16,000 square feet of steep slopes disturbance and approximately 21,800 square feet of stream buffer disturbance. By locating the travel ways and parking in the proposed concept plan, we are able to conserve 70% of the development for open space. The small, prefabricated footprint of the residential buildings are intended to minimize the disturbance, as they are retrofitted into the landscape. Mass grading of the road and parking is needed to comply with applicable site design requirements, as well as ensuring safe access for both residents and emergency vehicles. Proposed Proffers to Address Impacts The applicant for ZMA2018-00018 would like to proffer development conditions for the purposes of ensuring development on the property is consistent with descriptions provided in the application narrative and provided in discussions about development concepts with County Staff. We would like the opportunity to continue to work with Staff to incorporate these commitments into the application in either the application plan or a draft proffer statement, prior to the plan moving to the Planning Commission. This "proffer narrative" includes the 3 Table "S2501" Occupancy Characteristics. U.S. Census Bureau, 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates scope of commitments the applicant intends to adhere to if the property is granted rezoning approval by the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors. The proposed commitments are as follows: Buildings + Construction • Maximum of 100 residential units: 50 "primary" units with a maximum square footage of 1,000 square feet and 50 "secondary" units with a maximum square footage of 600 square feet • The number of secondary units may not exceed the number of primary units • Mass grading limited to point of site ingress/egress, internal roadways, and parking areas • Adherence to sensitive environmental building construction (i.e. pier foundations) Recreational Requirements • Provision of adequate recreational areas for not only parcels 32-5A and 32-5A1, but also for 32-22K1 • Construction of pedestrian bridge across Flat Branch in approximate location as shown on the Application Plan • Repurposing of portion of existing vehicle access way to pedestrian path • Provision of public access easement from site entrance to and across pedestrian bridge ZONING MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATION PLAN ZMA201800018 & SP201800023 RIVER'S EDGE TMP(s) 32-5A & 32-5A1 project I D: 15.064 Submitted 17 December 2018 REVISED 16 SEPTEMBER 2019 Context Map Sheet 1 of 23 INDEX OF SHEETS 1 - Cover & Context Map 2 - Site & ZMA Details 3 - Existing Conditions 4 - Existing Conditions 5 - Land Use 6 - Proposed Circulation 7 - Conceptual Sewer 8 - Conceptual Grading 9 - Road Grading + Profile 10 - Road Grading + Profile 11 - Road Grading + Profile 12 - Road Grading + Profile 13 - Road Grading + Profile 14 - Conceptual Stormwater 15 - Conceptual Stormwater 16 - Conceptual Stormwater 17 - Conceptual Stormwater 18 - Steep Slopes Disturbance 19 - Stream Buffer Disturbance 20 - Concept Plan 21 - Site Section A -A' 22 - Site Section B-B' 23 - Street Section SHIMP ENGINEERING, P.C. Image provided by Google Maps OWNER/DEVELOPER Rivers Edge Holdings LLC & Rivers Edge Associates LLC C/O Access Properties 2027 Woodbrook Ct Charlottesville, VA 22901 PROPERTY ADDRESS 2260-2280 Rivers Edge Road Charlottesville, VA 22911 DISTRICT Rivanna CRITICAL SLOPES & STREAM BUFFER There are existing steep slopes and stream buffers on site. SOURCE OF BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHY Compiled from the Albemarle County Office of Geographic Data Services GIS Data. Topographic road survey completed by Brian Ray, Roger W. Ray & Associates, Inc. Surveying, September 2018. FLOODZON E According to the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map, effective date February 4, 2005 (Community Panel 51003CO286D), this property does lie within a Zone AE 100-year flood plain. WATER SUPPLY WATERSHED Non -Watershed Supply Watershed WATER AND SANITARY SERVICES Provided by Albemarle County Service Authority (ACSA) FIRE CODE Units will be provided with an automatic sprinkler system USE EXISTING: R1 - Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Neighborhood Density Residential & Private Open Space PROPOSED: Residential ZONING EXISTING: Rural Areas OVERLAY: Airport Impact Area, Entrance Corridor, 100- Year Floodplain, Steep Slopes - Managed & Preserved PROPOSED: Planned Residential Development (PRD) PROPOSED UNITS 50 primary units + 50 secondary units. Gross density of 3 units/acre, net density of 11.6 units/acre. OPEN SPACE Open space area shall be provided in accordance with Sec. 4.7 of the Albemarle County Zoning. ZONING MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATION PLAN ZMA201800018 & SP201800023 RIVER'S EDGE SITE & ZMA DETAILS Sheet 2 of 23 TMP(s) 32-5A & 32-5A1 Submitted 17 December 2018 REVISED 16 SEPTEMBER 2019 project: 15.064 SHIMP ENGINEERING, P.C. ZONING MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATION PLAN - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -'- - - - - - - - - - - - J - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Z MA201800018 & S P201800023 RIVER'S EDGE ---------------------=----------- --------------- -------------------T------------r---------r------EXISTING TMP 32-5F ► Seraphic Holdings LLC , Zone: Light Industrial ► . Use: Distribution Warehouse ► , � � TMP 32-5E TMP 32-5 TMP 32-5A TMP 32-5B Chiro LLC � kext Generation LL( TMP 32-22K1 Rivers Edge Holdings LC Seminole North LLC ► Zone: Heavy Industrial ► : Zone: Rural Areas Incheon Holdings LLC Zone: Rural Areas Zone: Liht Industrial Use: Vacant Industrial g ►Use: Vacant Residenti Zone: Rural Areas Use: Single Famil � Use: Storage Warehouse , ' — — — — — - Use: Vacant Residential ►� ► ► TMP 32-22K ►— .� — _ — ► ► , Neighborhood Investments - NP LLC 1 ► Zone: Rural Areas _ Use: Vacant Residential ► TMP 32-5131 ► ► Albemarle County Service Authority ► ► , Zone: Light Industrial ► Use: Government Building ► TMP 32-5C1 MONO United States of America TMP 32-51) C/O US Arm ATTN: Real Albemarle County Service Authority Estate Division Zone: Light Industrial Zone: Light Industrial Use: Government Building e: Government Building TMP 32-5A1 Rivers Edge Associates LLC Zone: Rural Areas Use: Multifamily TMP 33-15 INk Next Generation LLC Zone: Rural Areas Use: Vacant Residential 225 0 225 450 675 LFLFLF---L--J-- Graphic Scale: 1"= 225' TMP 32-5C4 United States of America C/O US Army Corp/Eng Office/Counsel Zone: Rural Areas Use: Vacant Residential CONDITIONS Sheet 3 of 23 TMP(s) 32-5A & 32-5A1 Submitted 17 December 2018 REVISED 16 SEPTEMBER 2019 project: 15.064 SHIMP ENGINEERING, P.C. /°a4 b°l _ — — — ---- ---- \- --- --- ZONING MAP AMENDMENT .a al a> APPLICATION PLAN ° —_ _ _ - — c. o �° °o r_ ° _� eb �o \ - - - - - - - - - - - -I - - - - - _ -r Z _ � MA201800018 & SP201800023 �ra o� a 3ao� a I a'm \ 0 0 0 0 �' 1 *Now o .� �_ ��= i FEIVIABF 3�� d°'p6 , 1 I 1 RIVER'S EDGE paw' v°° ao I e°� �a/w 1 �� II 1 A 1 I oc �b°� o„�c °a ° I oc r69 / 1 �V I v� j ��' a °'1 1 f EXISTING CONDITIONS o ' Sheet 4 of 23 ' e °°o °,d a c hI \ , ,I o00 9 1 \\\ 60 go opebl l °o i �° 6 °by°--1 EMA F63 `\�\` ,°■`o% i "a°- ., ■ a i M \ e I Additional Notes: 0 0 o t O o o°' a b - i r o V 0 1 b o of A A 1 , 0/ . o 0 1 O ° / o e e 1 (96 op ' \ °a°°•o o\ ba��Ja��-a-o-a-0�o"o-��o�a o-o a I o \ \ �+/ 0 0'1 ° r ° ° ° ° ♦ o d ° .9-: ate. _ 1 � \ A � . � � / h 1 1. Source of dashed parcel boundaries: Albemarle is /0 e c b `e� v 0 O-W-O e o �-o_ � 0_0: —0 A- _ ��_� �, / O o//i _ 0.9A ed0 0 Q� o O O \u a♦° c �L♦ \ \\ \\ \ \\ Ite`/ 6- -0 --fe— — — — A - \ ' — r\o \ n a°/ 9/�ii° �Q-y■ °�@- tr�\ a��4 a AdDPeO •�O/� °9 a/ CountyGISe°I -c °e o oP�\ oa 0pO ♦ � hOe_O ♦1 - d.a o_— o °1 o� \� - o 2. Source of parcel boundary for TMP 32-5A and aApproximate ° a aa;5,' ol 32-5A1: survey data and plat of record 0 O 0. \ — 1 0 ��• 0 4 0,. location of �� - /- o °a'D� oa\o.,, o°o� \\ � �'\-------- 1 \ _ \ �\-,r�cyeo o �d �°p o�e'O�,/ e a n ° n a O ♦\� a o O a o/w basketball c . I °o \ �bv v b -1_ - - o o o' y L court ♦ JqV BF o e 14 _ ° - • .0. �. ev 1 o n e a e ♦ 360 °�V -238'uc. �O° ° �e 0 0 o.L ao a`o a -a / 1 _ 1 0 _ •I- ° ° + @ Q -a-a p O Q o 0 0 0 0- °-� w1 -- -0° o e Io 9 3ovRO° °�° °o ° Ti°oo'4 vao0. 0o.o c a ■ A r o cam° i ( y o - v �o° a \\ \ti \eo °0eaoe-oen v - ° i - g °- O�� 9 -0-- 4 4One9 a, 90e3e0_ O r e 1� a �� \� `3 J� a ■ wa e a �f� �r O � a4 ,�4k0_ O a—�a D 42 e aQ�-..-°___ o o- --e d-'-T ° a a 4 O b/ V•4 . ° _ -�;off _9420— O-�II on O 00 O-� �Qa QO-0 O 00 �0 oo ao°' ° 3 „'o,, 0 034a q 0.Q-° Qa o' o ---_o---0_ o_e_�a c�o4-0 1 aoa e a 4 o e •e a o o A q - \ a v e Go- - -- e e ce c e Re °v°+�Oo pO� �oA s 000' yaw■o��°�.� � ��6' a v`O 0, v e a Oa v�Oyv�� ,bp �o o sav�eO vv v / \ �� I� 'o ° °� .0.0 4�sob �, Key a° - --i o- —j // �I �I ' O� i i�I,i i,' ' a-Ob$1♦p io4 a _Ceo�e V-4p/O yaI �e '\-�A�o o-�/�FEMA BFE 3 oe 3 ;.. GIS Parcel Boun dary ° pe o o �vb R tc- C°FEMA Base Flood Elev ation Boundary o°a 0111 / %I-��0 0 o�OO o o e 4Streamtea.a xa °o�aFv av9 °-o po� ---- 4 00� o i a v v v \v �vOy�aE� Waterway a°��o 66 .o a 6 Oeoa eOe, JJU 100-Year Fl oodplain \ \ ��-___-_ ----_ o - ,°bv - - _ _ _- -_- - '/� / / a a a ,, �' a° °Mb _ e a Water Protection Ordinance Buffer \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 4\O.° O 0 9 O° ° Q -09,� \° /� o �` _ e°oP.° ` 'eao °° ODriveway .; ., �� b e\ EMA BFE 387 / �� 000 o� p Critical Slopes: Preserved \ -- ---— 0. d Z'oo!Q °O' / 0aO` ° . ahe- O r °oO ae �° o ° OwR o`o e-°po e4, o- Q-.',9 ervOo d Critical Slopes: Managed eo O° —O OO O OO OO 4, o Po oQoa \ — — \ \ \ \ \s—o-- o as -�° ♦ \ \a w _ a'� s 6� / ° ■ v6 — ■tip \ _� o as°°° ° �bT0.__O" ��A o° -5A&32-5A1 - - - -w, % % TMP(s) 32 oe • Q �� i /� a as o \ - - ° a aa_:a / / ' - / - - ° ° a e ° - - - Submitted 17 December 2018 200 0 200 400 600 LFLFLF---L---F- Graphic Scale: 1"= 200' REVISED 16 SEPTEMBER 2019 project: 15.064 SHIMP ENGINEERING, 111 -7 r r r Existing structure r • ,�. I r to be preserved • and repurposed as r amenity for TMP 32-5A, 32-5A1, A r and 32-22K1 � r u \ r r 1_ r ol oF J. T Approximate : • ' . , / �� i . - \ location of tot lot 200 0 200 400 600 LFLFLF---L--J-- Graphic Scale: 1"= 200' ZONING MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATION PLAN ZMA201800018 & SP201800023 RIVER'S EDGE LAND USE CATEGORIES Sheet 5 of 23 LEGEND LAND USE PROHIBITED USES PERMITTED USES Travel ways, ingress/egress, Right -of -Way Residential buildings grading, landscaping, utilities, Reservation* along with other uses typically permitted within ROW Residential buildings, signage, grading, landscaping, open Buildable Area None space, utilities, sidewalks, parking, primitive trails, retaining walls, stormwater management facilities Improvements Stream restoration, primitive that require mass trails, landscaping, gardens, Open Space grading, open-air utilities (which cannot be located surface parking lots, reasonably outside of residential buildings open space area), and primitive buildings - see note 1 below) ® 50' Forest Buffer Residential buildings, parking Travel ways, ingress/egress, for grading and disturbance *Right-of-way reservation area is shown for circulation feasibility purposes. The ROW reservation location is approximate and may change during site plan. 1. Primitive buildings and structures, such as picnic pavilions, may be constructed within the portion of the open space area that is outside of the floodplain, stream buffers, and preserved slopes. The maximum number of sites for primitive buildings or primitive structures or similar outdoor amenities shall be five (5). The maximum disturbance area of any individual primitive building or primitive structure or similar outdoor amenity shall be 500 square feet. The maximum aggregate disturbance area for all sites for primitive buildings or primitive structures or outdoor amenities shall be 1,500 square feet. Primitive buildings, primitive structures, and similar outdoor amenities are intended to serve as an accessory use to the development and are not intended for use on a daily basis. Key — Stream Waterway 100-Year Floodplain _ Critical Slopes: Preserved Critical Slopes: Managed TMP(s) 32-5A & 32-5A1 Submitted 17 December 2018 REVISED 16 SEPTEMBER 2019 project: 15.064 SHIMP ENGINEERING, III aoP() o� I ' I -b bd - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Existing paved •'�•_��10 a ,-=�p�\�D�'��\/\a�,„ ,d- / 4e\D '/ v 1d 'I�V /�/.�a/ =0I■\-/q moAv\ av oQ�-'>1�v 0e°o°a r�- 0eV /�■a,\�\ ,�r\�9od°�i O°i\ �eYd■*ooAv f a •°04 ° a1VII qe■ �7o\ ��%EPal �0�\ ° - ,° °°V \��1n A�/Vl-A A \e (Qe I VvA ��/- o Iv\'A�Iv/ \ '._\e►�� aV ��•T ' eAI� ,' v--�, 1d 4��•vi1/bI\I, 1 b�ey.�d+�'P aa-vv �V �`s_a' \�■ , \ �l��°�0Ii4aeao! I'��III1 �I °°7 �o02�/�/ �VV��/ 0e�ba�t■a ��a/I,\�IQ1 �w�n�� j��Re °°o� • IA �� Il\b_-0io �-■\� a b♦�pr•/°•e\ -\--/V-b\�� °/ ve � //-l�\\-,°/VHIa.�°rI A 1`I� ��V1 segv�QI \d \O\Ao/AALe3 R ° o &bb♦ �\� o�0\Oa\'�\ \� °ona°o � `e�v ��b��e1e�V�eh°bv°��a°Q�'v. \��EA- 1 n ��°O_°O�v■■n\be��e�o\ ,��-p�Oa��a °qrb°a°>A volo¢adn b0e■Q-�\•7i�-\�y.�vaas4r.°°s- os'F=Iv �� y o igP/Da■\eSb\/=\\vvv y './gyebCa./�OeO,p s°°� �\ vv A-��\ i/e-D\4 peo/ �(-� A -aeoea_6��o° _ �b- ��d°-v0\a°ep4C /- .�-0-- aa°r�■bavae'ee v�Az�� -°�)��-e�a-� 3�-�vy .98v �bo\Z�-2r0c 0.°0 `\_ v .�r- \ePee� 2-3 ��ae�o°0_�L. _-r�/a�e��\\p b�v ��vae-�0o�♦ge_�----��-3�VO ♦9_r0..a�/x � v--�a-CA °0e/� bVi4s� -- a'vv°-l�-�3�aOa°e'E-�a- --eea-- road to becoe a /----------°--�c---- --!aAa0r.v -\\I3_-• �S0 o%�b�/--o°-_i♦- -'t� %��p1 e'=v �- \ 1 - /°Aom v --esAeO- \ -\I a111A1yi F\ --\A�-bove- Oi a o\'/ � ` - _�■\ --' a�-\ 'v -S��'eO ♦ p°-�ese °\-- 1 - —I�0-\�. b. 'o •wQ,-ue-` - ---��ej_- l _ -/ O�e■ea_ te=��bb °��y 'P,°e°��ae�e�° . //0Oao�9�pl /(1 IT1oO � 01e •�1,��/ff1 /�qa°(o6¢1 �oeed// ' / ,6////��i■e1 ■�ee�■ ,/ /I'rI/�0�9l�so■°°O o°"bd�' II f ' 9 �l/,�rI ��aea0�nRYP,,/bIta0a°a�PvI/o A A'/I / „'♦a°n�OI�ieI,\ / t //\�b1�ieee, �.F °� � 3/ dd� �°°arbOyd-Jd_//'// ��%$�ap0.y�■ov;u�d�a-,//(J/(i/ A-c�v a/ �/i e�d�ov�/e�■�/ �eae,' /'( ot�d%■d's-° - 1 ----------- oo°/ / Y °%� pedestrian path I q Existing structure Pedestrian bridge ° %i °+tobe preserved connection across Flat �0/ 4,PIvRIo and repurposed as,, Branch to TMP 32-22K1v\\amenity for TMP 0e9 4 IL 032-5A, 32-5A1, 4d 32-22K1ans�%o di o 0O a,--0��0/Ao i01 ,,Approximate /P /0 location of "I ;ip ° P °basketball ♦� '0 04court o_ o/ 0\°,O o a 000 ,°L�/O` / ��OO 60 ? ••/ a -■°e e°4414 Za a \ e o 'C e°b o�v0.a � �/ �ed -- / v°oO oo,b •1am �e -0° ♦ e 0o 0%o-A / 1. Ic 16� - -\I�- /ce\ Ah j_ :oo0d �J0 4f .�-a 40\o'/o -0 -°� a oV,A o aoo s 0 r -D s N� /eO0Poo A o °. �ff� ry / °*i-5&9ea o J.0b'�°aO- ° eer-46 , b9y / r e C o 1/ _ \ - - - - - - _ �- - -- - \-A \v\ vv\ V v\v��`� �'-O■\�� at�o-'- _-°- --- w��s `baO�L�`A��■a V�\�� Ab�ypv�bPd�A� �, `v♦ ♦�` �pb ♦ � � ��+°-/ °_ .�o °� e-� e%,0°�e °��%�■P %s,�0 i�ee9i ✓o� P ° g/do;-a °ol� l y�atv1 erv0 o s�la■/°� o " °�oe°9°�6aei 6Ao�i�6ier�'/v°0 -O -::0:. p ° e °-OA °;tr° -- -__ - - - - var — 4 6 ■ ��° bOo�-_ C/ F0 - ee ■ e ' 200 0 200 400 600 LFLFLF---L---F- Graphic Scale: 1"= 200' ZONING MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATION PLAN ZMA201800018 & SP201800023 RIVER'S EDGE PROPOSED CIRCULATION Sheet 6 of 23 Key • �• Public Access Pedestrian Path 1 I I i i Pedestrian Connection ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Vehicular Circulation Primitive Trail (Internal Network) Stream _ Waterway 100-Year Floodplain 0 Travelway _ Pedestrian Circulation _ Paved Pedestrian Path o [37-0 o ° Critical Slopes: Preserved 0 Critical Slopes: Managed TMP(s) 32-5A & 32-5A1 Submitted 17 December 2018 REVISED 16 SEPTEMBER 2019 project: 15.064 SHIMP ENGINEERING, Oil - - % ✓1 0� \ '1 v ■7��9 4�r - _ �_ a r-a-ram_ ��r�r� �� _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ s _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ it — Ov A, sKvVylv-- - - - pump station •� a ��'1 ;'• ``- - -_- _ _ - _ __ • O ■O ee1 Om�010O o� ■ e .o r, ■ o- 0 0 1 o- 0 0 ■ o ,.� ` __ _ , o � bf o 90 ° �°�°m �°-aa�m °�--°as, 9�,.-_° o- � � _ _ - - r------------------------- - -- I _ � —s¢ s'� + r'r - �a —¢- •� a �rm\ / 1 \ 1` _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _I —� -i-- o �A A,��,��, o� et' � e ilk public manhole ■ e ■ r. a O I -9 e- ov r �` V � ♦ �°o o / °al v� o� I ° 6/ 1■ ve m oboe e9 9 i s■ / Lm ■ p / to ♦ ° 1 oM / �. o v A A b9 o hbl m9a �,v - \v \ \\ \ \A\ \\\ \ \ D \b �■f rl a 11� \ , Ped10Pq � t �°�� , A a°>ao ;s co b 1j� -. / 0 �000� �. n Il v v \ 1I � v \ \ V A \ 11I — II /o0 a o e so mme: Pitforce in„-4 !O oP moot iw_i 06 v\ \\ o 61 ��I.0 .� o�� o a°° dl v I A A A 1 oaAe�oa o` v 1 v aL v` e l l 1 eOm I a 0 q � o P b ■ a'. l ��. Po e °li: PSI■� M{Ir I\ \ \ 11 /■�:� qy-� rP r' 0 o■p elm ■ t °\\ -• ry1yiy�� / �,`oqol� ._4o `��—o ar� v�a��o-or-�tFa►a�o _r—ao-�4:sooaey�-Q—e■� Pla/�i �,�'v— ,�,��aa r/A y a i •diy /■ fi `, BoaoDn■e �6/ooqP ° � o06 "°rd CPF o Op/ 41 1o0—m o Oo ma11r, o ° o a �9 � P Oop /O 1 I- d t q � \�r �• � \ \ \ \ \ i �a P- � — — �. ' — \ dam'- - /P � / � ■� � I I !� b sA��\ \ \ V A v / V v 4�- • -� —°`i lt�■ / o / o d° C \ � 9� lY' i � �A q T ` .��\ \ � } \ \ \ \ � .oa r P4 0 o o� d e aPd — �o ■ dP�% 6 " o "ej _ 90 ar/ • \ \ r a� ,� � �,��" Private\force main sanityod\� - _ _- _ 1 y ,\ \- ��46 ,6 d _ �� • � �av I >� a� �s _ . � � �� o�■e v49 ,��+°C. ofa r �■i a w�� •� btu 'so_� ,0 4 r `°or a 2y�- ° o -0� od��' 1 1 - 1- - - - - _ I ■4 ' I / / a�o' p� e e P ti_ Qe \m e i� ` O' -a6`a. -� -■ -P-_ r4 4� d�G a9��6a 4 - a oQ v e ..� �Voa o oe 9 o e v s 6 '_ o° 04•0 �.P i %/ °rP o�v _° - pp IF; ° a57d 6 a +� e■ - aR �. Q�r�Q.�„1A w A P v .03 Al Go 4W Go lei ab �- r ,o - q , - - - - oQ o$o° s - rP�o ' a o°- oo'B°��-off 1 o aI wo o 41, ao o y-6 a qD o 00 aq _ r _ c a - sd° 3bP ■off\ !\ �. a an L Cr i9 d / A �'� ♦m oo �° m - - �_ aid':0 1 aq'��p�oao c v ♦ Oe� v a or — v810��,�� \ \o dO~ OdA�16sp ojo m o► a77 �Q6�I/ � 0 0a Q �bm ap y sa Am v v v v v v vdill e 'n rr °v.�. O ebob Wm. \ \ V \ i0a s 41 gym fp a 600 Li v v v _ Graphic Scale: 1"= 200' 0 op �0■7 — _ — s I4 s o9�s GO o -10 / e 000 .A` avity sanitary / =e 60 Gravity sanitary -Private pump station ,°Q, '�O - I - m"f,a ��9 �� v oa-a.�.°�° rp�'0i / o�'�vgs/ °m o� � a �o�eor e�� oo0 P ��oeom ° o �o' a/ r obi O�m @ 4 aA,'aoo r� A o wB� i j �'Da H a6r4 ,i�a ♦ 0 e re � / / / A �o � o / p\y _F� 1 ♦ e6O9 R40 ZONING MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATION PLAN ZMA201800018 & SP201800023 RIVER'S EDGE CONCEPTUAL SEWER Sheet 7 of 23 Key Stream Waterway 0 100-Year Floodplain 0 Travelway _ Pedestrian Circulation _ Paved Pedestrian Path o e o Critical Slopes: Preserved 0 Critical Slopes: Managed TMP(s) 32-5A & 32-5A1 Submitted 17 December 2018 REVISED 16 SEPTEMBER 2019 project: 15.064 SHIMP ENGINEERING, III _ - 4 - - _ P NDM T �_ wflw7� ICRTL� PLAN _0---a - — --- --- _�\ \0 ,Q \�, \tom MA2040018&020180 3 RIVER'S EDGE \� CONCEPTUAL GRADING �_-- &IN-- '� � '��'--_�-- 2'INGWAL4 ` �� --� -- `p\ Sheet8of23 bob V ' \ ETAININ ALL \ - - \ \ - �FTW 406 W 398 '\RETAINING WALL o � � \ TW 43 i I BV� 4 x42P TW412 BW `-- 3& i _ 10 AD_ _ 40- -8- RUNNING WALL Q a a------------ 406 TW 418 o BW 398 v J / 410 x — 10p / C. � I 408 — — BW 400 / TMP(s) 32-5A & 32-01 Submitted 17 December 2018 REVISED 16 SEPTEMBER 2019 50 0 50 100 150 LFLFLF---L---F-- project: 15.064 Graphic Scale: 1„=100' S H I M P ENGINEERING, P. C. 50 0 50 100 150 LFLFLF---L---F- Graphic Scale: 1"= 50' ZONING MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATION PLAN ZMA201800018 & SP201800023 RIVER'S EDGE ROAD GRADING + PROFILE Sheet 9 of 23 Additional Notes: 1. Topographic road survey completed by Brian Ray, Roger W. Ray & Associates, Inc. Surveying, September 2018 Key GIS Parcel Boundary Stream Waterway 0 100-Year Floodplain 0 Driveway Critical Slopes: Preserved TMP(s) 32-5A & 32-5A1 Submitted 17 December 2018 REVISED 16 SEPTEMBER 2019 project: 15.064 SHIMP ENGINEERING, P.C. \ / / ZONING MAP AMENDMENT O APPLICATION PLAN ZMA201800018 & SP201800023 RIVERS EDGE ROAD GRADING + PROFILE Sheet 10 of 23 IL 1 I i ►0--4 � •� G O I I I 41 �0 / - �r � � o \� c 00 O \[� c • , p p O O O o �. O C7 :3 50 0 50 100 150 LFLFLF---L---F- Graphic Scale: 1"= 50' Additional Notes: 1. Topographic road survey completed by Brian Ray, Roger W. Ray & Associates, Inc. Surveying, September 2018 Key GIS Parcel Boundary Stream Waterway 0 100-Year Floodplain 0 Driveway Critical Slopes: Preserved TMP(s) 32-5A & 32-5A1 Submitted 17 December 2018 REVISED 16 SEPTEMBER 2019 project: 15.064 SHIMP ENGINEERING, P.C. ZONING MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATION PLAN 1 ZMA201800018 & SP201800023 RIVER'S EDGE ROAD GRADING + PROFILE ♦ \ _ �� p 41* ♦ O 0 O \� ♦ 0 46 \\ a -,a � TMP(s) 32-5A & 32-5A1 41 _ e 4111 50 0 50 100 150 LFLFLF---L---F- Graphic Scale: 1"= 50' Submitted 17 December 2018 REVISED 16 SEPTEMBER 2019 project: 15.064 SHIMP ENGINEERING, P.C. t Proposed gr: is � =mwwwviumm-m-M--mm dL-vt. � --ice'— mmm _— t -�--O----� - a Q ;�� -_ ---- -� �� -_ -� _�- M PA'1vIENDMWIT -�_ --a _-- ----� _- —d- `Q\ - �� o- __ -- a - A IU TI(NPLAN � 0 AW -10 _ � ' - - -0- 43- a 0 - \ Q , 43, MA20fW0018 & 20180A3 -__ -- i v v 'S EDGE ` \� \CONCEPTUAL STORMWATER MIN --- _ 6-_A --,�, `0� — �� Sheet-14_of23 \ \ X \ v 4% ` \ ETAININ ALL 'RETAINING WALL 1 � \ \ TW 43 BV� 4 1 � I Storm drain inlet _ -- -'- / TW412 Storm drain inlet BW xss° i -8= RE-TANING WALL ' - - - X18' / �' •� 0 v G -- - --------- _ / 06' / _ • 1 / TW 418 o / B 98 ' V nUf 410 — X1oa C. p oGP Discharge to open space Underground detention 50 0 50 100 15( LFLFLF---L---F- Graphic Scale: 1"= 100' with engineered level _ — 408 spreader — BW 400 � � TMP(s) 32-5A & 32-01 Key 0 100-Year Floodplain 0 Critical Slopes: Preserved 0 Critical Slopes: Managed Submitted 17 December 2018 REVISED 16 SEPTEMBER 2019 project: 15.064 SHIMP ENGINEERING, 42 �� I �� J W / \ 0 - a O I •��I a �► Q I I I � 1 � � � w Storm drain inlet i 1) I 0 1 on III I� ��aQo 1 (U 1 �0 - �4) o �I /0 50 0 50 100 150 LFLFLF---L---F- Graphic Scale: 1"= 50' ZONING MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATION PLAN ZMA201800018 & SP201800023 RIVER'S EDGE CONCEPTUAL STORMWATER Sheet 15 of 23 Additional Notes: 1. Topographic road survey completed by Brian Ray, Roger W. Ray & Associates, Inc. Surveying, September 2018 Key GIS Parcel Boundary Stream Waterway 0 100-Year Floodplain 0 Driveway Critical Slopes: Preserved TMP(s) 32-5A & 32-5A1 Submitted 17 December 2018 REVISED 16 SEPTEMBER 2019 project: 15.064 SHIMP ENGINEERING, P.C. \ / / ZONING MAP AMENDMENT O APPLICATION PLAN ZMA201800018 & SP201800023 Q \ \ \ as ♦ RIVERS EDGE Q \ \ Storm drain inlet ♦ S' CONCEPTUAL STORMWATER 1� \ \ '9 `� O a ♦ O Sheet 16 of 23 IL 1 I i ►� o--4 � •� G O I I I 41 \� c O O \r� C. % p O O C7 :3 50 0 50 100 150 LFLFLF---L---F- Graphic Scale: 1"= 50' Additional Notes: 1. Topographic road survey completed by Brian Ray, Roger W. Ray & Associates, Inc. Surveying, September 2018 Key GIS Parcel Boundary Stream Waterway 0 100-Year Floodplain 0 Driveway Critical Slopes: Preserved TMP(s) 32-5A & 32-5A1 Submitted 17 December 2018 REVISED 16 SEPTEMBER 2019 project: 15.064 SHIMP ENGINEERING, P.C. ZONING MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATION PLAN 1 ZMA201800018 & SP201800023 RIVER'S EDGE CONCEPTUAL STORMWATER O � O N O Sheet 17 of 23 p o O to 42 Additional Notes: A Q ` Q 1. Topographic road survey completed by Brian Ray, J L Roger W. Ray & Associates, Inc. Surveying, September O O Q V 2018 �. ♦♦ o ♦ ,� A — D o O D o O o o 0'Nor a a a 43 a O a a O a O ' � 0\°Xo - O 4 O O 4 O O a O a 4 a a 0 Q `\ Storm drain inlet 0 0 0 0 0 2jXo � in 41 O O O a � G 0 O .� 1 C C. a a O a 3x00 o C• _ G O O To sheet flow 41 \ \\� ` \ _ 411* 7 into open space \0 \ L o O\ n_ e In a _ e 4 50 0 50 100 150 LFLFLF---L---F- Graphic Scale: 1"= 50' Key GIS Parcel Boundary Stream Waterway 0 100-Year Floodplain 0 Driveway Critical Slopes: Preserved TMP(s) 32-5A & 32-5A1 Submitted 17 December 2018 REVISED 16 SEPTEMBER 2019 project: 15.064 SHIMP ENGINEERING, P.C. 0 100 0 100 200 300 LFLFLF---L---F- Graphic Scale: 1"=100' ZONING MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATION PLAN ZMA201800018 & SP201800023 RIVER'S EDGE STEEP SLOPES DISTURBANCE Sheet 18 of 23 Additional Notes: 1. Topographic road survey completed by Brian Ray, Roger W. Ray & Associates, Inc. Surveying, September 2018 2. Total disturbance of the steep slopes is approximately 16,000 square feet Key — — — Adjacent Parcels - Stream W Road _ Waterway 11 Water Protection Ordinance Buffer Critical Slopes: Preserved 44 Steep Slopes Disturance TMP(s) 32-5A & 32-5A1 Submitted 17 December 2018 REVISED 16 SEPTEMBER 2019 project: 15.064 SHIMP ENGINEERING, -`a -a-- O o �_ZONING o 3 -daa------------------------- MAP AMENDMENT 0 0 9 9 APPLICATION PLAN 0 O 0 0 a Z MA201800018 & S P201800023 f' D F- v ', oa: 0 D a O D 04 D 0� a O RIVER'S EDGE a o ° " ° o r o ° av a ° °� STREAM BUFFER DISTURBANCE o a' O o ( Additional Notes: 1. Topographic road survey completed by Brian Ray, Roger W. Ray & Associates, Inc. Surveying, September 2018 2. Total disturbance of the stream buffer is approximately 21,800 square feet Key — — — Adjacent Parcels Stream Road Waterway _ Water Protection Ordinance Buffer o ° o ° Critical Slopes: Preserved Stream Buffer Disturance TMP(s) 32-5A & 32-5A1 Submitted 17 December 2018 REVISED 16 SEPTEMBER 2019 project: 15.064 SHIMP ENGINEERING, P.C. — �.. $° ZONING MAP AMENDMENT 5�otdP�s e ° a e� ° _ — - aQo .°.°°°.....°. °°°.°° .°°°.°. .• e°e.° ° .. °°°.°°°°°°• .•° e.' ..,°.°°. .° ° .•°..•°..°..°°..° =•:`° APPLICATION PLAN ° o -aQa ZMA201800018&SP201800023o e° ;�Leoate o. oQooQaoQ000 QaoQooQa eoQOQaooa`o : a�a — o RI ERi S EDGE at-�OAAH °_ o ° e�°e_ ze° rel•� �a �� ° ems^ F a\Qa o� V.�-0.0... o o . �o Sao •l: a p°aoQa;tiea aaao �0a a °'�O �°74e�ES°a•&�°�°°° o°$ o° PLANTED "° ; ° oo\ o. a� _�_° aka so��e �� 2-BEDROOM UNIT •° ° rRF& °�( �Ep•?R e ` I ° ° °°a ° ,°- 4' R'ETAINING WALL CIT o •ate°,°° mob°� ��, � �� - � - - - °- - o°. �e \� A 8RETAININGWALLp,oa"aq 40°•0?e° °ovA lo o °°° e° i ° °� TOP/BOTTOM DUPLEX STYLE i FEMA BFE 388' . . . ° i o 1 o' 0 o° o °0° 0�°e°0°o°e•0 oBYRETAI._INGWA - 'o . . . . ° o ° . . .o °o e ° ° . e . - oo, ., %°0000e°°°' 0 4,_ . . . . . . . I e° ° °° •°°°,'° e.40 °°tee° -, r - ° ° °e°ae °sea°eo: °°°°°°°,° °-- -- - .° - - . . 01 . . ,e ° Lm eao $ o �abovb�Qoo:' 0\oba a°A° 60 0 60 120 180 LFLFLF---L---F- Graphic Scale: 1"= 60' °I'o :soo 6° a90�32-5AJ SubmiY tj� a .DIEember 2018 REVISED 16 SEPTEMBER 2019 project: 15.064 SHIMP ENGINEERING, Existing grade Existing trees to be preserved where possible Planted trees ining wall , rr I - 1 16 �J 1� I_ �� L -'!I - / / 4 - - . 440- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -A - - - - - - - It -A OY — A 420- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ZONING MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATION PLAN ZMA201800018 & SP201800023 RIVER'S EDGE SITE SECTION A -A' Sheet 21 of 23 Planted trees ining wall 400- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 40 0 40 80 120 LFLFLF---L---F- Graphic Scale: 1"=40' 8' retaining wall Top/bottom duplex TMP(s) 32-5A & 32-5A1 Submitted 17 December 2018 REVISED 16 SEPTEMBER 2019 project: 15.064 SHIMP ENGINEERING, P.C. Jr Ar 0 Existing trees to be preserved where possible 440 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---------- - T-- - Existing grade Lq Planted trees ZONING MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATION PLAN ZMA201800018 & SP201800023 RIVER'S EDGE SITE SECTION 6-13' Sheet 22 of 23 -qg- - - - - - / 8' retaining wall 8' retaining wall 420 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - t4 400 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -L - 25 0 25 50 75 LFLFLF---L---F- Graphic Scale: 1"=25' _ _p/bottom duplex TMP(s) 32-5A & 32-5A1 Submitted 17 December 2018 REVISED 16 SEPTEMBER 2019 project: 15.064 SHIMP ENGINEERING, P.C. RURAL STREET SECTION SHOUL[ VARIABLE WII 4' GRADE 5 0 5 10 15 LFLFLF---L---F- Graphic Scale: 1"=5' EXISTING RIVER'S EDGE ROAD 12' PAVED ROAD VARIABLE WIDTH TYPICAL STREET SECTION INTERNAL ROAD NETWORK 2 Q' TRAVEL LANE 28' )ULDER 'TABLE WIDTH Note: waivers from urban street section may be pursued at site plan HOULDER ZONING MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATION PLAN ZMA201800018 & SP201800023 RIVER'S EDGE STREET SECTION Sheet 23 of 23 TMP(s) 32-5A & 32-5A1 Submitted 17 December 2018 REVISED 16 SEPTEMBER 2019 project: 15.064 SHIMP ENGINEERING, P.C. The following exhibits analyze the topographic features of the site and have helped to inform the conceptual development plan of the site. DEM The digital elevation model (DEM) of the River's Edge property was created using Central Virginia LIDAR data. The topography represents the existing elevation and informs the following diagrams. The topography is lowest along the Rivanna River and highest in the middle of the parcel. I LJ LJ I I I Feet 0 100 200 400 600 800 HILLSHADE The DEM hillshade model visualizes the changing ZONING MAP AMENDMENT Z MA201800018 & S P201800023 RIVER'S EDGE GIS ANALYSIS Sheet 1 of 2 TMP(s) 32-5A & 32-5A1 Submitted 17 December 2018 REVISED 16 SEPTEMBER 2019 project: 15.064 SHIMP ENGINEERING, P.C. SLOPE The slopes analysis represents how different elevations on -site meet one another. With preserved steep slopes in the property, it is essential to design development that is mindful of these sensitive environmental features. 25% or above slopes are considered critical slopes. 4 Value 6-4% 4-10% 10-16% - 16-23% - 23-32% - 32-58% ►19 - � r woo -ram jr \J Feet 0 100 200 400 600 800 ASPECT Solar aspect analysis reveals how the sun will illuminate the development. This analysis helps to inform where structures and open space should be located and how buildings and other features on -site should be oriented. n �Iv__ffj r r fr AM ` -w v r r- •r • M N do .0116�.nmh.x• - N "q E SE S SW r W NW F% 1 T �1 -;A jam ZONING MAP AMENDMENT Z MA201800018 & S P201800023 RIVER'S EDGE GIS ANALYSIS Sheet 2 of 2 e Feet 0 100 200 400 600 800 TMP(s) 32-5A & 32-5A1 Submitted 17 December 2018 REVISED 16 SEPTEMBER 2019 project: 15.064 SHIMP ENGINEERING, P.C. SHIMP ENGINEERING, P.C. Design Focused Engineering Mr. Frank Pohl, County Engineer County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 Revised: September 16, 2019 Initially Submitted: December 27, 2018 RE: TMP 32-5A and TMP 32-5A1— River's Edge Request for Central Sewerage System and Central Water Supply System Dear Mr. Pohl, In conjunction with a request to rezone Parcels 5A and 5A1 (The River's Edge PRD), which would allow a maximum of 100 dwelling units on a 32.5-acre site off Seminole Trail; the Applicant is also requesting permission to construct a central sewerage system for the dwelling units. The central sewerage system would consist of a system of sewer laterals, collecting waste from the dwellings; a gravity collector system, flowing to a pump station; and a force main sanitary line, carrying waste to a manhole along Route 29 North. The manhole would provide gravity flow under Route 29, to a collection station, operated by the Rivanna Sewer and Water Authority, located directly across from the site. The central water supply system would utilize a single meter, provided by the Albemarle County Service Authority, to bring water from the Route 29 to serve the proposed dwelling units along with a system of fire hydrants as may be required for the proposed development. The intent of the River's Edge PRD is to create rental units (a maximum of 100) under single ownership; and Section 16-102 of the County Wastewater and Water System Ordinance requires approval by the Board of Supervisors for a system designed to serve three (3) or more connections. The proposed development is within the jurisdictional area of the Albemarle County Service Authority for both sewer and water, and while the development plan proposes just one metered connection to the ACSA sewer and water system; as many as one hundred (100) individual buildings could be served by the single meter. It is our understanding that this would require the approval of a private system for both sewerage treatment and water supply. The proposed development is on a single parcel (with no proposed subdivision) that is surrounded by steep slopes, floodplain, and the North Fork Rivanna River; making it impractical to extend the system to adjoining parcels. Additionally, the system requires a pump station and force main line for the single parcel and it would be impractical to burden the service authority with the maintenance and operation of these facilities to serve a single meter. 912 E. High St. Charlottesville, VA 22902 1434.227.5140 1 shimp-engineering.com Granting permission of a central sewerage system and central water supply system will allow the Applicant to meet a goal for the project of developing independent dwelling units that are environmentally and aesthetically sensitive without providing management and financial burdens on public utilities. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at your convenience. I can be reached at: justin(cshimp-en ing eering com or by phone at 434-227-5140. Regards, Justin Shimp (434) 227-5140 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY SP # Fee Amount $ Date Paid By who? Receipt # Ck# Bv: Resubmittal of information for A " &IN • 7 T T Z • � Special use Permit PROJECT NUMBER THAT HAS BEEN ASSIGNED: SP2018-023 Owner/Applicant Must Read and Sign I hereby certify that the information provided with this resubmittal is what has been requested from staff September 16, 2019 ignature Ptivehes r Date •434) 227-5140 Print Nam Daytime phone number of Signatory tAbo�'vY>� C 4b1) 2-04 — 22`+ FEES to be paid after annlication For original Special Use Permit fee of $1,075 First resubmission (TO BE PAID WHEN THE RESUBMISSION IS MADE TO INTAKE STAFF) Free ❑ Each additional resubmission (TO BE PAID WHEN THE RESUBMISSION IS MADE TO INTAKE STAFF) $538 For original Special Use Permit fee of $2,000 ❑ First resubmission (TO BE PAID WHEN THE RESUBMISSION IS MADE TO INTAKE STAFF) Free ❑ Each additional resubmission (TO BE PAID WHEN THE RESUBMISSION IS MADE TO INTAKE STAFF) $1,075 RECEIVED SEP 16 2016 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Voice: (434) 296-5832 Fax: (434) 972-4126 Revised 1 I12./2015 Page l of 1 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY SP # Fee Amount $ Date Paid By who? Receipt a Ck# By: Resubmittal of information for Zoning Map Amendment PROJECT NUMBER THAT HAS BEEN ASSIGNED: ZMA2018-018 Owner/Applicant Must Read and Sign I hereby certify that the information provided with this reubmittal is what has been requested from staff September 16, 2019 Date 434-227-5140 Print NameJDaytime phone number of Signatory FEE C� �� ( Clow) S that may apply: ��1 `�@ �hnau l l42�91 ��► l D ❑ Deferral of scheduled public hearin at applicant's request $194 Resubmittal fees for original Zoning Map Amendment fee of $2,688 First resubmission FREE ❑ Each additional resubmission (TO BE PAID WHEN THE RESUBMISSION IS MADE TO INTAKE STAFF) $1,344 Resubmittal fees for original Zoning Map Amendment fee of $3,763 ❑ First resubmission FREE ❑ Each additional resubmission (TO BE PAID WHEN THE RESUBMISSION IS MADE TO INTAKE STAFF) $1,881 To be paid after staff review for Public notice: Most applications for a Zoning Map Amendment require at least one public hearing by the Planning Commission and one public hearing by the Board of Supervisors. Virginia State Code requires that notice for public hearings be made by publishing a legal advertisement in the newspaper and by mailing letters to adjacent property owners. Therefore, at least two fees for public notice are required before a Zoning Map Amendment may be heard by the Board of Supervisors. The total fee for public notice will be provided to the applicant after the final cost is determined and must be paid before the application is heard by a public body. ➢ Preparing and mailing or delivering up to fifty (50) notices $215 + actual cost of first-class postage ➢ Preparing and mailing or delivering each notice after fifty (50) $1.08 for each additional notice + actual cost of first-class postage ➢ Legal advertisement (published twice in the newspaper for each public hearing) Actual cost (averages between $150 and $250) RECEIVED SEP 16 2019 County of Albemarle Department of Community Developrb4MUNITY 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Voice: (434) 296-583LD�'t"""-RIM,pr,-4N'1126 Revised 11 ,02 2015 Page 1 of I