Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201800070 Review Comments Final Site Plan and Comps. 2019-10-01Al A�v �'1RG1Nt�' County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville, VA, 22902 434-296-5832 Memorandum To: Craig Kotarski, P.E. — Timmons Group (craig.kotarskiktimmons.com) Jonathan Showalter, P.E. — Timmons Group (Jonathan.showalter(a),timmons.com) Paul Huber, L.S. — Timmons Group (paul.huberAtimmons.com) From: Tim Padalino, AICP — Senior Planner [tpadalinogalbemarle.org / (434)-296-5832 x 3088] Division: Planning Date: October 1, 2019 Subject: Lighthouse Instruments — Final Site Plan (SDP201800070 — revision date 7/16/019) The County of Albemarle Planning Division will recommend approval of the plan referenced above once the following comments have been satisfactorily addressed (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.): [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference, which is to the Subdivision/Zoning Ordinances unless otherwise specified.] [32.5.2(d), 30.7.4(b)(h)] [32.5.2(d), 30.7.4(b)(h)] Source of Topography. The steep slopes depicted on the plan do not match those slopes that are depicted on the County GIS Overlay, which is a zoning district adopted by the Board of Supervisors. Provide the source of the topography utilized on the plan. Prior to approval of the final site plan, the County Engineer must sign off on the topographic information as being more accurate. Final: The site plan utilizes new/conceivably more accurate topographic information from a field survey; however, the plan fails to depict the slopes approved by the County's Steep Slopes Overlay District. The plan shall be revised to depict the County's topography and distinguish with hatching the new topography of slopes less than 25%. Rev 1. Comment addressed. 2. [32.5.1(c)] The following improvements are proposed on adjacent parcels and require recorded easements prior to final site plan approval: • TMP 77-7: sanitary sewer pipes and stormwater management pipes (All connections are proposed through TMP 77-9A) • TMP 77-9A: public water line easements, stormwater management pipes, drainage inlets, drainage easements, sight distance easements, road improvements, temporary construction easements. • TMP 77-8B: road improvements, temporary construction easements, public dedication of right-of-way (for areas outside of existing dedicated r/w), sight distance easement, stormwater management pipes, and drainage inlets/easements. • TPP 77-8C: road improvements, temporary construction easements, public dedication of right-of-way (for areas outside of existing dedicated r/w), public water line easements Prior to final site plan approval the required offsite easement shall be platted. The DB PG reference information of these actions shall be provided on the final site plan. Rev 2. Multiple plats have been submitted which depict the public right-of-way dedication, associated public drainage easements, temporary construction easements, and all other required easements for the construction and use of the public road. Each plat contains required revisions that must be addressed prior to receiving approval. Prior to final plat approvals, all improvements necessary for the construction, use, and maintenance of the public road shall be approved on a road plan and built or bonded pursuant to Section 14-434, 14-435, and 14-435.1 of the Subdivision Ordinance. Additionally, prior to final site plan approval all public right-of-way dedications, associated public drainage easements, temporary construction easements, and all other required easements for the construction, use, and maintenance of the public road shall be recorded in the Clerk's Office. Prior to final site plan approval, all improvements necessary for the construction, use, and maintenance of the public road shall be approved on a road plan and built or bonded pursuant to Section 32.8.1 and Section 32.8.2 of the Zoning Ordinance. Prior to final site plan approval provide the recordation information for each of the required easements next to the applicable easements. Rev. Comm. (10/1): Partially addressed. Staff acknowledges the following: (A) the review processes for on - site easements (SUB201900090) and off -site easements (SUB201900091, SUB201900092, and SUB201900093) are ongoing — see CDD-Planning review comment letter dated 10/1/2019; (B) the review process for the road plans (SUB201800044) is ongoing— see CDD-Planning review comment letter dated 10/1/2019; and (C) revisions have been made to easement plats SUB201900090 (TMP #77-9/Lighthouse Land) and SUB201900092 (TMP #77-9A/ASTEC Partnership) to depict the required easements associated with private sanitary sewer laterals, and the review process for those easement plats (and associated deeds/maintenance agreements) is ongoing — see CDD-Planning review comment letter dated 10/1/2019. However, please address and resolve the following prior to approval of the final site plan SDP201800070: (D) Prior to final site plan approval, the required on -site and off -site easements shall be platted. The DB and PG reference information of these approved and recorded easements shall be provided on the final site plan. (E) Prior to final plat approvals, all improvements necessary for the construction, use, and maintenance of the public road shall be approved on a road plan and built or bonded pursuant to S.O. Sections 14-434, 14-435, and 14-435.1 and Z.O. Sections 32.8.1 and Section 32.8.2. Thank you. 3. [32.5.1(c)] The proposed building and a proposed retaining wall are within an existing VEPCO easement (DB 424 PG 434). Prior to final site plan approval provide written documentation from the easement holder that the proposed improvements are permitted within the easement. Otherwise, relocate these improvements outside of the easement. Final: The vacation plat shall be submitted, approved, and recorded prior to final site plan approval. The DB PG reference information of these actions shall be provided on the final site plan. Rev 1. Comment still relevant. Rev 2. Comment still relevant. Rev. Comm. (10/1): Not addressed (on plans dated 7/16/2019). The final site plan dated 7/16/2019 does not appear to show the vacation information. Staff acknowledges the comment response from Timmons Group (dated 7/17/2019) which explains that the "information will be provided as soon as it is available." Please ensure this DB and PG information is identified on the final site plan SDP201800070 after the VEPCO easement is vacated. Thank you. 4. [32.5.1(c)] A proposed retaining wall is within an existing VEPCO easement (DB 1432 PG 13). Prior to final site plan approval provide written documentation from the easement holder that the proposed improvement is permitted within the easement. Otherwise, relocate these improvements outside of the easement. Final: Comment addressed. 5. [4.20(b)] Stepbacks. On the plan label the actual height of the building and the number of floors. Without this information staff is unable to determine if stepbacks apply. For each story that begins above 40 feet in height or for each story above the third story, whichever is less, the minimum stepback shall be 15 feet. Final: Comment addressed. Stepbacks are not applicable based on the height. 6. [32.7.2.3(a)] Sidewalks along streets. Provide sidewalk on one side of the existing and proposed public street serving the development. Based on the prescriptive easement for the roadway the sidewalk is only required on one side of the road (the side on the subject property). Final: Comment addressed. 7. [4.12.18(a)] Minimum Design Requirements. Dimension the clearance height for the loading area. The minimum is 14.5' clearance height. Final: Comment addressed. 8. [32.5.2(f)] Existing and Proposed Improvements. Label the max height of all retaining walls. Final: Comment addressed. 9. [Comment] Provide directional arrows on the travelways throughout the plan. Final: Comment addressed. 10. [32.7.2.1] Vehicular Access to Site. Each entrance onto any public street shall be designed and constructed as required by the standards of the Virginia Department of Transportation. VDOT approval of the proposed entrance(s) to the site shall be required prior to final site plan approval. Final: Comment still relevant. Rev 1. Comment addressed. 11. [32.5.2(i)] Streets, easements and travelways. Label Avon Court as either public or private. If public label the State Route Number. Depict and label the end of state maintenance. Final: Comment partially addressed. On the existing conditions page depict and label the end of state maintenance. Rev 1. Comment addressed. 12. [32.7.1.2] Reservation for Future Dedication. Revise the extent of the roadway being dedicated to public use as required by VDOT. Also, on the plans set apart and label an area of land for the right-of-way and for temporary construction of the roadway that extends to TMP 77-7. Label this area as "Hereby reserved for future dedication upon demand of the County". Final: The plan incorrectly labels the 21.5' portion of public right-of-way serving the development as the reservation for future dedication, this sections' label shall be revised to "Hereby dedicated to public use for public right-of-way ". This section should also be provided a deed book page reference number for the recorded plat that dedicates the right-of-way. The dedication plat shall be submitted, approved, and recorded prior to final site plan approval. Rev 1. Comment partially addressed. Pending submittal of the right-of-way dedication plat for review/approval. Rev 2. In consideration of the recently submitted easement plats please revise the site plan notes associated with the reservation and dedication of right-of-way as follows, see comment #29 below. The section of right-of-way that is 15' wide is correctly labeled as "hereby reserved for future..."; however, the width of this section is inadequate for a future public road. To remedy this, either increase the width of this easement on the subject property to sustain a future public road and temporary grading easement, or obtain the additional right-of-way with from the adjacent property to facilitate this future right-of-way. Rev 1. Comment partially addressed. Continue the 21.5' reservation area and the 10' wide grading easement area reservation all the way to the property line. Rev 2. In consideration of the recently submitted easement plats please revise the site plan notes associated with the reservation and dedication of right-of-way as follows, see comment #29 below. 13. [32.5.2(n)] Existing and proposed improvements. If there is to be a sign for the proposed use, on the final site plan depict and label the sign location. (Depicting the sign on the final site plan is not approval of the sign location or type). Final: Comment addressed. 14. [32.7.9.5, 14-410(H)] Street Trees. Revise street tree calculations and plantings to include the areas for the entrances and the area fronting the building. Staff measures 381 linear feet of frontage. Based on the prescriptive easement for the roadway the street trees are only required on one side of the road (the side on the subject property). Street trees shall be placed in a landscape island between sidewalk and the curb (14-410(H)). Final: The item was discussed prior to final site plan submittal and has been remedied with the proposed location of the street trees. Comment addressed. 15. [32.7.9.8] Tree Canopy. When calculating the required tree canopy do not subtract the SF for the proposed improvements, such as the building. Revise the calculations. Final: Comment addressed. 16. [32.5.2(e), 32.7.9.4(c)] Existing landscape features. On the landscape plan identify whether existing wooded areas are evergreen, deciduous, or a mix thereof. Final: Comment addressed. 17. [32.7.9.4(b)] Existing trees may be preserved in lieu of planting new plant materials in order to satisfy the landscaping and screening requirements of section 32.7.9, subject to the agent's approval. If you intend to use existing trees to satisfy any of the landscape plan requirements, please include the following: A. Areas and other features shown on landscape plan. The landscape plan shall show the trees to be preserved, the limits of clearing, the location and type of protective fencing, grade changes requiring tree wells or walls, and trenching or tunneling proposed beyond the limits of clearing. Final: On the site plan depict the limits of clearing, and provide the location and type of protective fencing. Rev 1. Comment addressed. B. Conservation checklist. The applicant shall sign a conservation checklist approved by the agent to ensure that the specified trees will be protected during construction. Except as otherwise expressly approved by the agent in a particular case, the checklist shall conform to the specifications in the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook, pages III-393 through III-413, and as hereafter amended. Final: The conservation checklist on sheet L2 shall be signed by the owner. Rev 1. Comment still relevant. Rev 2. Comment addressed. 18. [32.5.2(n), 4.17.41 Outdoor Lighting. Any proposed outdoor lighting must be shown on the site plan. A photometric plan and lighting cut sheets must be provided with the final site plan. Proposed lighting must comply with requirements of Sec. 4.17 of the Zoning Ordinance. Finalt Comment addressed. Rev 2. Comment previously addressed with the first submittal of the final site plan; however, staff noticed additional items previously overlooked that must be revised to meet the ordinance. On the lighting plan provide the light loss factor (LLF) utilized to develop the lighting plan. LLF must be 1. Ensure the spillover does not exceed 0.5 for the public right- of-way. Also, within the lighting plan provide a cutsheet diagram for fixture type W3. This lighting fixture must be full cutoff because it is over 3,000 lumens. Rev. Comm. (10/1): Partially addressed — staff acknowledges the Luminaire Schedule on Sheet L3.0 indicates that the LLF = 1; and the cutsheet for fixture type W3 which appears to demonstrate that this fixture is compliant with full cutoff requirements contained in Z.O. Section 4.17.4. However, please further revise the Lighting Plan as follows: (A) Sheet L3.0 shows at least two instances of spillover within the public right-of- way exceeding 0.5 footcandles (0.6 near proposed new sidewalk and 0.8 near the stopbar for the proposed new entrance). Please revise the proposed lighting plan such that there is no spillover in excess of 0.5 footcandles within the public right-of-way or on any adjoining properties. Thank you. 19.[4.14, 4.14.1 - 4.14.5] Performance standards for industrial uses apply to the proposal. On sheet 1 provide the following note: "Performance standards for industrial uses apply to the proposal as dictated by Section 4.14.1 - 4.14.5 of County Code and the use shall be subject to those standards ". Also, on the sheet 1 provide the following note: "This use is subject to Section 4.18 Noise regulations. " Final: Comment addressed. 20.[4.14.5] Certified Engineers Report. A Certified Engineers Report shall be completed/complied with prior to the approval of the final site plan. Final: Comment addressed. 21. [32.6.2(h)] Signature Panel. Provide the required signature panel. Assure that each member of the site review committee is provided a signature line. Final: Comment addressed. 22. [Comment] The final site plan shall not be approved until all SRC reviewers have approved the plan. Their comments attached. Final: Comment still relevant. Rev 1. Comment still relevant. Rev 2. Comment still relevant. Rev. Comm. (10/1): Comment still relevant. Based on information available to this reviewer on this date, it appears that a review status of "No Objection" has been specified by all SRC members except for ACSA and RWSA (which appear to have a review status of "Pending") and also CDD-Engineering (David James indicated on 8/7/2019 that "[he] can change status to No Objection once the other plans & plats are approved."). 23. [Comment] Economic Development Access Project Grant Program. Rev 1. Applicant no longer pursuing EDA grant. 24.[4.12.4] Maximum Number of Parking Spaces. The number of parking spaces in a parking area may not exceed the number of spaces required by more than twenty (20) percent. The site is over the 20% threshold by 3 spaces. Please remove the 3 spaces furthest from the building on the curve. Rev 1. Comment addressed. 25.[32.5.2] Provide the SDP# on the cover sheet: SDP2018-70. Rev 1. Comment addressed. Rev 2. Ensure the title of the plan lists that this is a "Final Site Plan". Rev. Comm. (10/1): Addressed. 26. [Comment] Prior to final site plan approval a VSMP and Road plan shall be approved. Rev 1. Comment still relevant. Rev 2. Comment still relevant. Rev. Comm. (10/1): Partially addressed — staff acknowledges the following: (A) The VSMP plan application WPO201800017 appears to have been approved on 9/17/2019; and (B) The road plan review and approval process for application SUB201800044 is in progress. 27. [30.7.4(b), 32.6.2(g)] Preserved Slopes. The proposed private utility easement for the sanitary sewer lateral is depicted through preserved slopes. This use is not permitted in preserved slopes, revise the easement and the improvement to be outside of the preserved slopes. Please work with ACSA to determine the minimum width of the easement needed. Rev. Comm. (10/1): No objection — please see review comment letter (dated 10/1/2019) for easement plats SUB201900090 and SUB201900092. 28. [30.7.4(b), 32.6.2(g)] Preserved Slopes. Sheet C4 incorrectly depicts the preserved slopes on TMP 77-9A. Revise to correctly depict these slopes. Rev. Comm. (10/1): Addressed. 29. [32.7.1.3(a), 32.7.1, 32.7.1.1, 14-428, 14-429] In consideration of the recently submitted easement plats please revise the site plan notes associated with the reservation and dedication of right-of-way as follows: Dedication Area "21.5' Wide Public Right-of-way Area Hereby Dedicated to the County of Albemarle for Public Use." Reservation Area "21.5' wide area hereby reserved for future dedication for public use." "10' wide area hereby reserved for future dedication for public use (for grading purposes)." Rev. Com. (10/1): Addressed. 30. [32.7.9.5, 32.7.9.6, 32.7.9.71 The street trees provided for the site are in excess of the minimum required amounts. The site is only required one of the two provided street tree calculations; either, large deciduous or medium deciduous; however, this plan provides both. If the applicant chooses to provide both, this is permissible; however, ensure that the additional plantings are listed as optional and not required. Also, the shrubs provided to screen parking from the public street are not calculated based on linear frontage of the public road; rather, they are only provided as needed to screen parking from the right-of-way. The following is the site's required street tree and parking screening calculations: a. 1 large street tree for every 50' of street frontage (mil '/50' = 7.62) Required 8 large deciduous trees along the public street. Street trees were previously approved to be located behind the sidewalk, they may remain. Provide a 6' wide landscape and maintenance easement on SUB2019-90 for these trees, ensure the easement and the tree locations coincide. Provide a maintenance agreement for this landscape easement. Depict, dimension, and label this easement on the site plan and provide the recordation information. b. Single row of 12" evergreen shrubs planted 5' on center along the perimeter of the parking lot adjacent to the public right-of-way. For these evergreen shrubs ensure the planting schedule lists a minimum height of 12" at planting. Rev. Comm. (10/1): Partially addressed. Staff acknowledges the following: (A) the Landscape Plan on Sheet L1.0 and L2.0 has been revised to satisfactorily address previous comments regarding landscaping along streets and screening requirements. However, please further revise final site plan SDP201800070 as follows: (B) Landscape easement and corresponding deed/maintenance agreement are not required (that portion of the previous review comment has been WITHDRAWN). Please remove "6' Landscape Maintenance Easement" and corresponding notes from Sheets L1.0, C4.0, C4.3, and elsewhere (as may be applicable). In consideration of the recently submitted easement plats please revise the site plan as follows: 31. [32.8, 32.8.1, 32.8.21 Multiple plats have been submitted which depict the public right-of-way dedication, associated public drainage easements, temporary construction easements, and all other required easements for the construction and use of the public road. Each plat contains required revisions that must be addressed prior to receiving approval. Prior to final plat approvals, all improvements necessary for the construction, use, and maintenance of the public road shall be approved on a road plan and built or bonded pursuant to Section 14-434, 14-435, and 14-435.1 of the Subdivision Ordinance. Additionally, prior to final site plan approval all public right-of-way dedications, associated public drainage easements, temporary construction easements, and all other required easements for the construction, use, and maintenance of the public road shall be recorded in the Clerk's Office. Prior to final site plan approval, all improvements necessary for the construction, use, and maintenance of the public road shall be approved on a road plan and built or bonded pursuant to Section 32.8.1 and Section 32.8.2 of the Zoning Ordinance. Prior to final site plan approval provide the recordation information for each of the required easements next to the applicable easements. Rev. Comm. (10/1): Partially addressed — staff acknowledges the following: (A) The review process for easement plat applications SUB201900090, SUB201900091, SUB201900092, and SUB201900093 (and corresponding deeds/maintenance agreements) is in progress; and (B) The road plan review and approval process for application SUB201800044 is in progress. 32. [32.8, 32.8.1, 32.8.2, 32.7.1.3(a), 32.7.1, 32.7.1.11 Provide the required temporary construction easement ,lotl;—foci rn 111;o „— nn TMP 77-9 to construct the public road. Rev. Comm. (10/1): Addressed. 33. [32.5.2] The property lines and the easement lines throughout the site plan are indistinguishable from other lines on the plan. Revise these lines to be a darker color and preferably thicker. Rev. Comm. (10/1): Addressed. 34. [32.6.2(g), 4.11 Sewer Systems. Depict, label, and dimension the existing sewer easement on TMP 77-9A. Also label the owner of this easement. Rev. Comm. (10/1): Partially addressed. With the previous resubmittal of the corresponding final site plan (SDP201800070), staff has been made aware that the existing private sanitary sewer lateral located on TMP #77-9A and partially in the Steep Slopes Overlay District does not have an existing easement associated with that lateral's connection to the existing public RWSA infrastructure partially located in the WPO Stream Buffer and Flood Hazard Overlay District. Please revise final site plan SDP201800070 to be consistent with easement plat applications SUB201900090 and SUB201900092, which have recently been revised to show a proposed easement over the proposed private sanitary sewer line on TMP #77-9 and a proposed easement over the existing sanitary sewer line on TMP #77-9A (all the way to the point of connection with the existing RWSA infrastructure, and for the benefit of TMP #77-9 and TMP #77-9A). A maintenance agreement shall be recorded with those easement plats; based on information provided by the applicants during a meeting conducted with County staff on Monday 9/23, the maintenance agreement has been finalized and is ready for approval (subject to review and confirmation by the County Attorney). After those easement plats are approved and recorded, please add the DB and PG reference for those recorded easements to final site plan SDP201800070. Thank you. 35. [32.6.2(g)] Private Easements. Ensure the new 20' utility easement is centered on the new water line. Rev. Comm. (10/1): Addressed. 36. [32.6.2(g)] Public Easements. The site plan depicts a new gas line originating on TMP 77-9A; however, the new 20' utility easement doesn't appear to encompass the new gas line. Provide an easement for the gas line. Rev. Comm. (10/1): Addressed. 37. [32.6.2(g)] Public Easements. Provide a gas line easement throughout the prescriptive ROW for Avon Court. Rev. Comm. (10/1): Addressed. 38. [32.5.2a] Yards. Rev* �t 1 to label the setbacks. Rev. Comm. (10/1): Addressed. 39. [32.5.2a] Zoning Classification. On the cover sheet, add the following zoning overlay districts: • Steep slopes: managed slopes and preserved slopes overlay district • Entrance Corridor overlay district • State and Federal dam inundation zone • Airport Impact Area Rev. Comm. (10/1): Addressed. 40. [32.5.2(t)] Dam Break Inundation Zones. Depict and label the limits of a dam break inundation zone as depicted on the County GTS Rev. Comm. (10/1): Addressed. CDD-Engineering —David James / diames2@albemarle.org Review Status: See Recommend (8/7/19): "I can change status to No Objection once the other plans & plats are approved." CDD-Inspections — Michael Dellinger / mdellinger(a),albemarle.org Review Status: No Objection (5/30/19). CDD-E911— Andrew Walker / Note: For fixture requests for assistance, please contact Andy Slack (aslack(dalbemarle.org). Review Status: No Objection (9/25/18). Albemarle County Fire — Rescue — Shawn Maddox / smaddoxkalbemarle.org Review Status: No Objection (6/3/19). Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) —Adam Moore / adam.moorekvdot.virginia.gov Review Status: No Objection (8/2/19). Virginia Department of Health (VDH) — Josh Kirtley / Joshua.kirtleykvdh.virginia.gov Review Status: Approved (6/3/19). ACSA — Richard Nelson / rnelsongserviceauthority.org Review Status: Pending (as of 10/l/19); Comments pending to be forwarded once received. RWSA — Victoria Fort / vfort@rivanna.org Review Status: Pending (as of 10/l/19); Comments pending to be forwarded once received. Staff has provided references to provisions of Chapter 18 of the Code of the County of Albemarle. The Code is kept up to date by the County Attorney's office. The Code may found on the County Attorney's website which may be found under "Departments and Services" at Albemarle.org. In accord with the provisions of Section 32.4.3.5 of Chapter 18 of the Code if the developer fails to submit a revised final site plan to address all of the requirements within six (6) months after the date of this letter the application shall be deemed to have been voluntarily withdrawn by the developer. If you have any questions or requests for assistance regarding these review comments or regarding other aspects of your project, please feel free to contact me by phone or email. Thank you. Sincerely, Tim Padalino, AICP Senior Planner I Planning Division I Community Development Department 1adalino &albemarle.org / (434)-296-5832 x 3088