HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201800063 Correspondence 2019-07-24 1
Christopher Perez
From: Christopher Perez
Sent: Wednesday,July 24, 2019 2:09 PM
To: Wesley Carter; Erin Root;Tim Miller
Cc: Margaret Maliszewski
Subject: RE:ARB-2017-57:Albemarle Countertop; SDP-2018-63: Hydraulic Road LLC Minor
Amendment
Mr. Carter,
I received the revised site plan via PDF,I hope to complete my review by July 31st.
Christopher Perez I Senior Planner
Department of Community Development(County of Albemarle,Virginia
401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902
434.296.5832 ext.3443
From:Wesley Carter<wescarterbob@gmail.com>
Sent:Tuesday,July 23, 2019 12:31 PM
To: Erin Root<erinintrevado@gmail.com>; Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org>;Tim Miller
<meridianwbe@gmail.com>
Cc: Margaret Maliszewski<MMaliszewski@albemarle.org>
Subject: Re:ARB-2017-57:Albemarle Countertop;SDP-2018-63: Hydraulic Road LLC Minor Amendment
Checking in with everyone to see where we sit as of today.
Margaret, do you have everything you need?
Chris, do you have everything you need?
Let me know otherwise.
Wes
On Thu,Jul 18, 2019 at 5:01 PM Erin Root<erinintrevado@gmail.com>wrote:
Great!Thank you! It looks as though Tim did not apply the changes I made to the plan.What do we do about this?
Erin
On Thu,Jul 18,2019 at 5:00 PM Margaret Maliszewski<MMaliszewski@albemarle.org>wrote:
Thanks, Erin. I received it.
From: Erin Root<erinintrevado@gmail.com>
Sent:Thursday,July 18, 2019 4:08 PM
To: Margaret Maliszewski<MMaliszewski@albemarle.org>
Cc:Wesley Carter<wescarterbob@gmail.com>
Subject: Re:ARB-2017-57:Albemarle Countertop;SDP-2018-63: Hydraulic Road LLC Minor Amendment
1
Margaret,
I'm going to send it to you via WeTransfer.
Will you confirm that you've received it? -
Best,
Erin
On Thu,Jul 18,2019 at 9:30 AM Margaret Maliszewski<MMaliszewski@albemarle.org>wrote:
Erin, I am able to open the plant schedule attachment, but the site plan document link is not working for me.
From: Erin Root<erinintrevado@gmail.com>
Sent:Tuesday,July 16, 2019 3:54 PM
To: Margaret Maliszewski<MMaliszewski@albemarle.org>
Cc:Tim Miller<meridianwbe@gmail.com>; Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org>;Wesley Carter
<wescarterbob@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ARB-2017-57:Albemarle Countertop;SDP-2018-63: Hydraulic Road LLC Minor Amendment
Margaret,
P ,
4 �
1 2019_7_16_ACC Site Plan_1"=10'_pg 2,pdf
I've made changes to both documents. Please review to make sure I've done so correctly.
Thank you,
Erin
On Thu, May 30,2019 at 2:57 PM Margaret Maliszewski<MMaliszewski@albemarle.org>wrote:
Erin,
2
I'm confused by your questions. plant schedule identifies the required pl ig size and quantity.The schedule
must correspond to the drawing. If the drawing size or scale do not allow you to illustrate each individual plant,you
could employ a drawing convention that uses one symbol to indicate a particular quantity of one plant in a
particular location.Since the plan limits you to a required planting size,the quantity represented by the symbol
would not need to change. If you use a symbol to indicate more than one plant(for example,one cross-hatched
circle represents 20 sedge together in one location)then you will need to identify on the plan the quantity that each
symbol represents (in this example, 20 sedge).
Margaret
From: Erin Root<erinintrevado@gmail.com>
Sent:Thursday, May 30, 2019 10:37 AM
To: Margaret Maliszewski<MMaliszewski@albemarle.org>
Cc:Tim Miller<meridianwbe@gmail.com>; Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org>; Wesley Carter
<wescarterbob@Rmail.com>
Subject: Re:ARB-2017-57:Albemarle Countertop; SDP-2018-63: Hydraulic Road LLC Minor Amendment
Hi Margaret,
Regarding#2.Yes,the symbols are intended to depict several plants, as the amount depends on current sourcing
size. Can the note say this or does it need to say something specific?
Best,
Erin
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 10:45 AM Margaret Maliszewski<MMaliszewski@albemarle.org>wrote:
Tim,
I have reviewed the site plan submitted by Meridian Planning Group with revision date of 5/7/19. I have the
following comments:
1. My emailed comments from May 3 requested that a note be added to the plan indicating that the new
monument sign and sign lighting are shown only for information and are not approved with the site plan; a
separate sign application is required.This note was not added to the plan, but it is needed.
2. The plant quantities in the plant schedule do not appear to correspond directly with the plant symbols
drawn on the plan. Please explain these discrepancies/revise the landscape plan accordingly. (The
rendering of the landscape plan makes it difficult to read and to distinguish the various plant symbols. I
realize this may be contributing to the apparent inaccuracies.Also, if a single symbol is intended to
represent multiple plants,this will need to be noted on the plan/in the schedule.)
3
a. 60 white heat'_ __-_`er noted in schedule; 13 drawn on plan \
b. 10 poppy mallow noted in schedule; 23 drawn on plan
c. 100 Pennsylvania sedge noted in schedule; 16 drawn on plan
d. 26 Big bluestem noted in schedule; 31 drawn on plan
e. 63 Little bluestem noted in schedule; 36 drawn on plan
f. 11 switchgrass noted in schedule; 14 drawn on plan
g. 6 Ginkgo noted in schedule; 8 drawn on plan
Thanks.
Margaret
Margaret Maliszewski,Chief of Planning/Resource Management
Albemarle County Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville,VA 22902
434-296-5832 x3276
mmaliszewski@albemarle.org
•
Erin Intrevado Root
WHIL Innovations Post-doctoral Fellow 2014
Master of Landscape Architecture 2013
Master of Architecture 2011
University of Virginia
4
Erin Intrevado Root
WHIL Innovations Post-doctoral Fellow 2014
Master of Landscape Architecture 2013
Master of Architecture 2011
University of Virginia
Erin Intrevado Root
WHIL Innovations Post-doctoral Fellow 2014
Master of Landscape Architecture 2013
Master of Architecture 2011
University of Virginia
Erin Intrevado Root
WHIL Innovations Post-doctoral Fellow 2014
Master of Landscape Architecture 2013
Master of Architecture 2011
University of Virginia
•