HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201800041 Review Comments Initial Site Plan 2018-07-12Short Review Comments Report for:
SDP201800041 ]- BELVEDERE PHASE 5 - INITIAL
SubApplication Type: I Initial Site Plan
Date Completed: 06-14-2018
Reviewer: Michael Dellinger Division: CDD Inspections
Review Status: No Objection
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed: 07-01-2018
Reviewer: Shawn Maddox
Review Status:
Reviews Comments:
Requested Changes
Division: Fire Rescue
1. Cul-de-sac must be a minimum of 96' diameter.
2. Hydrant spacing appears to exceed 250' from any point on street or road frontage to a hydrant.
3. Developments of one- or two-family dwellings where
the number of dwelling units exceeds 30 shall be provided
with two separate and approved fire apparatus access roads.
4. Building heights are proposed to be 35'. If this is the case then the required unobstructed width of
the travel lane shall be 26' to allow for aerial fire apparatus access.
5. The street as shown would be required to be marked no parking on both sides.
6. A fire flow test will be required before final acceptance.
Date Completed:
07-06-2018
Reviewer:
Adam Moore Division: VDOT
Review Status:
Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed:
06-29-2018
Reviewer:
Richard Nelson Division: ACSA
Review Status:
Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
2018-06-29: 1 recommend SDP201800041 Belvedere Phase 5 — Initial for approval with the following
conditions:
1) Submit 3 copies to ACSA for water/sewer review.
2) RWSA sewer capacity certification will be required.
3) RWSA's comments will need to be addressed before final approval as well.
Date Completed: 06-28-2018
Reviewer: Victoria Fort
Review Status: Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Division: RWSA
2018-06-28: RWSA has reviewed the initial site plan for Belvedere Phase 5 as prepared by
Roudabush, Gale & Associates, Inc. and dated May 21, 2018 and has the following comments:
General Comments:
1. An RWSA sewer flow capacity certification will be required prior to final site plan approval
since the overall Belvedere Development produces sewage flow in excess of 40,000 gallons per day.
2. Include the RWSA General Notes on the plan (attached).
Sheet 05 of 08:
1. Label RWSA manhole as "RWSA RVI-MH-50" and call out invert elevations
2. Label RWSA sewer main as "RWSA 48" Sanitary Sewer Main"
3. The ACSA easement should extend beyond the RWSA sewer main (the two easements will
overlap)
4. Include a sanitary sewer profile in the final site plan showing the proposed 8" sewer
Page: 1 of 2 County of Albemarle Printed On: October 15, 2019
Date Completed:
Reviewer:
Review Status:
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed:
Reviewer:
Review Status:
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed
Reviewer:
connection.
5. Include the following RWSA sanitary sewer connection notes this sheet:
a. All connections to RWSA manholes shall be watertight and made with a flexible rubber boot.
b. All coring methods, the coring contractor and all materials for construction shall be approved
by RWSA in writing prior to construction.
C. RWSA Engineering Staff shall be present for all cores into the manholes.
d. Bypass pumping may be required at the sole discretion of RWSA staff.
e. Grouting of the manhole bench or interior may be required, at the sole discretion of RWSA
staff, for a smooth transition of flow.
f. Existing manholes shall be backfilled to original grade to the satisfaction of RWSA.
g. Contact RWSA Engineering a minimum of 3 business days in advance to schedule a core of
a manhole.
6. RWSA as -built drawings indicate that the base of the manhole may be 16-17' below finished
grade. Please note that RWSA does not allow internal drop connections. External drop connections
should conform to RWSA Detail Sewer 3 (see attached). Note that for an existing manhole, the invert
of the 8" connection should match the top of the bench (not the invert of main line, as shown). All
other requirements for a drop connection are as shown.
06-26-2018
Division: Health Department
No Objection
07-11-2018
Patricia Saternye Division: CDD Planning
Requested Changes
2018-07-11: Draft comments sent to applicant. This site plan requirea significant changes and
therefore a resubmission addressing specific issues must be provided or the site plan will be denied.
06-14-2018
Elise Kiewra Division: CDD E911
Review Status: No Objection
Reviews Comments: 1per site plan dated 5/21/18
Date Completed
Reviewer:
Review Status:
Reviews Comments:
07-03-2018
Emily Cox
Requested Changes
Division: CDD Engineering
Page: 2 of 2 County of Albemarle Printed On: October 15, 2019