Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZMA197900031 Approval - PC Zoning Map Amendment 1979-10-26Zvi OF ALBE/t'% �RG114S Department of Planning ROBERT W. TUCKER. JR. 804/296-5823 RONALD S. KEELER DIRECTOR OF PLANNING 414 EAST MARKET STREET ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF PLANNING CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 22901 DOUGLAS W. ECKEL SENIOR PLANNER September 26, 1979 NANCY MASON CAPERTON PLANNER Mr. Max Evans (DETTE CHARLIE KIMSEY PLANNER c/o Twin Group 2200 Old Ivy Road Charlottesville, Virginia Re: ZMA-79-31 Twin Group RPN Planning Commission Action Dear IYIr. Evans This is to advise you that the Albemarle County Planning Commission at its meeting September 25, 1979, by a vote of 7-2, recommended to the Board of Supervisors that your request to rezone 16.0 acres from A-1 to RPN/RS-1 be approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Approval is for a maximum of 10 lots. Location and acreages of land uses shall comply with the approved plan. Open space shall be dedicated in accordance with the number of lots approved in the final subdivision process; 2. No grading shall occur until the final subdivision process; 3. Compliance with the Runoff Control and Soil Erosion Ordinances; 4. Health Department approval of two septic field locations for each lot; 5._ County Attorney approval of Homeowners' Agreements prior to final subdivision approval; 6. Fire Official approval of hydrant locations, prior to final subdivision approval; 7. All lots shall have access only on the interior road; 8. County Engineer approval of road plans prior to subdivision approval; 9. Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation approval of commercial entrance and improvements to Route 654 prior to final subdivision approval; 10. No buildings shall be constructed on slopes of 250 or greater; 11. Only those areas where a structure, utilities, road or other improvement approved in a final plan are to be located shall be disturbed; all other land shall remain in its natural state; 12. All units shall be served by a public water supply system and approved by appropriate agencies prior to final subdivision approval. The Board of Supervisors will consider this request at its meeting October 17, 1979, 7:30 p.m., County Courthouse, Charlottesville, Virginia. YOU OR YOUR REPRESENTATIVE MUST BE PRESENT FOR THAT MEETING. Sincerely, 6,t,ane,'Gloeckner ng Department CC: Lettie Neher, Clerk to the Board - Pi1t September 25, 1979 STAFF REPORT ZMA-79-31. Twin Group RPN ( Jessup Property ) Requested Zoning: RPN/RS-1 Existing Zoning: A-1 Agriculture Acreage: 16.0 acres Location: Property is described as Parcel 28 (portion of) on Tax Map 60, and is located on the southwest side of Route 654, approximately 2 miles north- west of the Barracks Road Shopping Center. Character of the Area The site is bordered to the north by the Montvue Subdivision, to the southeast by the Colthurst Subdivision and the Old Salem Apartments are to the east of this parcel. The topography of the site ranges from 5% to 50% slopes with the majority being in rolling to moderate slopes ( 10% to 24.9% ). Existing Zoning in the Area Montvue and Colthurst Farm are zoned R-1 and other parcels surrounding the site are zoned A-1, Agricultural. The Old Salem Apartment site is zoned R-3. Comprehensive Plan Recommendation The site is located in the urban area and is recommended for low density residential, with a recommended density of one to four units per acre. Condition of Roads Serving the Proposal The 1978 traffic count on this section of Route 654 is 4,579 vehicle trips per day and is currently listed as tolerable. Comparative Impact Statistics Existing A-1 RPN/RS-1 Dwellings approx. 7 10 Population 21.7 31 Vehicle Trips Per Day 49 70 School Impact 3.99 4.7 History The Board of Supervisors denied ZMA-79-13 on July 18, 1979. Land Use Data Number of Lots Total Area Estimated Total Lot Area Estimated Total Open Space Range in Lot Size Proposed Gross Density Gross Density Permitted Proposed Net Density RPN Proposal 10 16.0 acres 9.43 acres 6.12 acres ( 38% ) 0.918 acres to 1.00 acre 1.6 acres/unit 1 du/gross acre 0.943 acres/unit The applicant proposes 10 single family lots with a gross density of 1.6 acres/unit with 6.12 or 38% of the land in open space. The site is proposed to have access on private roads. Public water is available and is proposed to be utilized for this proposal. Staff Comment The Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation has recommended that the road be widened along the development side of the road to accommodate a left turn lane for vehicles headed northwest out of Charlottesville. Site distance can be obtained for a commercial entrance. The staff has some concern about the steep slopes as they relate to the building sites shown on the plan. Mr. Yager, the Site Review Committee's representative from the U. S. Soil Conservation Service commented that the steep slopes would create "excessive erosion when disturbed" without proper soil erosion preventive measures. Staff recommends approval subject to the following conditions: Recommended Conditions of Approval 1. Approval is for a maximum of 10 lots. Location and acreages of land uses shall comply with the approved plan. Open space shall be dedicated in accordance with the number of lots approved in the final subdivision process; 2. No grading shall occur until the final subdivision process; 3. Compliance with the Runoff Control and Soil Erosion Ordinances; 4. Health Department approval of two septic field locations for each lot; 5. County Attorney approval of Homeowners' Agreements prior to final subdivision approval; 6. Fire Official approval of hydrant locations, prior to final subdivision approval; 7. All lots shall have access only on the interior road; 8. County Engineer approval of road plans prior to subdivision approval; 9. Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation approval of commercial entrance and improvements to Route 654 prior to final subdivision approval; 10. No buildings shall be constructed on slopes of 25% or greater; 11. Only those areas where a structure, utilities, road or other improvement approved in a final plan are to be located shall be disturbed; all other land shall remain in its natural state; 12. All units shall be served by a public water supply system and approved by appropriate agencies prior to final subdivision approval. Department of Planning ROBERT W. TUCKER. JR. 804/266-5823 RONALD S. KEELER DIRECTOR OF PLANNING 414 EAST MARKET STREET A6816TANT DIRECTOR OF PLANNING CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 22001 DOUGLAS W. ECKEL !SENIOR PLANNER June 27, 1979 NANCY MASON CAPERTON PLANNER Twin Group IDETTE CHARLIE KIMSEY ego Max Evans PLANNER 2200 Old Ivy Road Charlottesville, Virginia, 22901 Re: PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Request for ZMA-79-13 Dear Mr. Evans: This is to advise you that the Albemarle County Planning Commission at its meeting June 26, 1979, recommended by unanimous vote to the Board of Supervisors that your request for ZMA-79-13 be approved subject to the following conditions; 1. Approval is for a maximum of 12 lots. Location and acreages of land uses shall comply with the approved plan. Open space shall be dedicated in accordance with the number of lots approved in the final subdivision process; 2. Acreages approved for open space shall not include roads; 3. No grading shall occur until the final subdivision process; 4. - Compliance with the Runoff Control and Soil Erosion Ordinances; 5. Health Department approval fo two septic field locations on each lot; 6. County Attorney approval of Homeowners' Agreements prior to final subdivision approval to include the use of open s aca for septic facilities, and for P P P ..private road maintenance agreements; 7. Fire Official approval of hydrant locations, prior to final subdivision approval; 8. All lots shall have access only on the interior road; 9. County Engineer approval of road plans prior to subdivision approval;, 10. Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation approval of commercial entrance and improvements to Route 654 in accordance with the Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation letter dated June 6, 1979, prior to, final subdivision approval; 11. No buildings shall be constructed on slopes of 25% or greater and appropriate g; changes made on the plan for building site locations; 12. Only those areas where a structure, utilities, road or other improvement approved ' in a final plan are to be located shall ,be disturbed; all other land shall remain in its natural state;' 13. All units shall be served by a public water supply system and approved by appropriate agencies prior to final subdivision approval; 14. Soil study prior to final plat review by the Planning Commission. The Albemarle County Board of Supervisors will consider this request at its meeting Wednesday, July 18, 1979, 7:30 p.m., County Courthouse, Charlottesville, Virginia. YOU OR YOUR REPRESENTATIVE MUST BE PRESENT FOR TIIIS MEETING. Sincerely, neGloeckner j anning Department � STAFF REPORT June 26, 1979 ZMA-79-13 Twin Group RPN { Jessup Property ) Requested Zoning: RPN/RS-1 Existing Zoning: A-1 Agriculture Acreage: 16.0 acres Location: Property is described as Parcel 28 ( portion of ) on Tax Map 60 and is located on the southwest side of Route 654, approximately 2 miles north- west of the Barracks Road Shopping Center. Character of the Area The site is bordered to the north by the Montvue Subdivision, to the southeast by the Colthurst Subdivision and the Old Salem Apartments are to the east of this parcel. The topography of the site ranges from 5% to 50% slopes with the majority being in rolling to moderate slopes ( 10%,to 24.9$ ). Existing Zoning in the Area Montvue and Colthurst Farm are zoned R-1 and other parcels surrounding the site are zoned A-1, Agricultural. The Old Salem Apartment site is zoned R-3. Comprehensive Plan Recommendation The site is located in the urban area and is recommended for low density residential, with a recommended density of one to four units per acre. Condition of Roads Serving the Proposal The 1978 traffic count on this section of Route 654 is 4,579 vehicle trips per day and is currently listed as tolerable. Comparative Impact Statistics Existing A-1 RPN/RS-1 Dwellings approx. 7 ) Population 21.7 Vehicle Trips Per Day 49 ?C School Impact 3.99 A4, Land Use Data Number of lots Total Area 16.0 acres Estimated total lot area . acres Estimated total open space 6.12 acres pit) Proposed gross density f' acres/unit Gross density permitted du/gross acre t. RPN Proposal The applicant proposes /0 single family lots with a gross density of s 11(,-4u Wj &AZ ®r aj c=pen space. The site is proposed to have access on private roads. oJv-ka Ia4u4. Public water is available and is proposed to be utilized for this proposal. Staff Comment The Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation has recommended that the road be widened along the development side of the road to accommodate a left turn lane for vehicles headed northwest out of Charlottesville. Sight distance can be obtained for a commercial entrance. The staff has some concern about the steep slopes as they relate to the building sites shown on the plan. Mr. Yager, the Site Reivew Committee's representative from the U. S. Soil Conservation Service commented that the steep slopes would create "excessive erosion when disturbed" Recommended Condtions of Approval 1. Approval is for a maximum of 10 lots. Location and acreages of land uses shall comply with the approved plan. Open space shall be dedicated in accordance with the number of lots approved in the final subdivision process; �,No grading shall occur until the final subdivision process; . Compliance with the Runoff Control and Soil Erosion Ordinances; q-Health Department approval of two septic field locations for each lot; 6-County Attorney approval of Homeowners' Agreements prior to final subdivision approval to include the use of open space for septic facilities, and for private road maintenance agreements; &.Fire Official approval of hydrant locations, prior to final subdivision approval; 7.All lots shall have access only on the interior road; b.County Engineer approval of road plans prior to subdivision approval; Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation approval of commercial entrance and improvements to Route 654 prior to final subdivision approval; 16.No buildings shall be constructed on slopes of 25% or greater- and q9prepT4*te- 11,Jnly those areas where a structure, utilities, road or other improvement approved in a final plan are to be located shall be disturbed; all other land shall remain in its natural state; 17.All units shall be served by a public water supply system and approved by appropriate agencies prior to final subdivision approval. 4 } { a County of Albemarle Page -4- June 6, 1979 26) Cotten Final Plat, °pate 676 & Pnuto ()77: Property frontage is ade- quate for private entrance. We recommend improvements to the frontage along both roads placing the shoulder catch point at 15' from the center 14ine of the existing road, and the ditch where necessary at 181. The pipe at the intersection of Route 676 and Route 677 will -need to be relocated. his will be Ucne at Department expense. _W+ 2_7) Adventure Bound School The entrance while exi.stin does not have adequate sight distan- ce to.Jarc^e es TI. tie would recommend frontage improvements placing the shoulder at 15' from the center of the existing road and the ditch at 181. ---28) Gordonsville Electrical Substalion Site Plan. Poute 6L6: The entrance location appears to have adequate sight distance. A. commercial entrance will be re- quired, however, before the permit can be approved a determination of the number of vehicles using the entrance needs to be given. We would reco =end that the frontage of the property along Route 646 be improved placing the shoulder catch point at 15, and the center of the ditch at 18' from the existing center line of the road. --29) FHM Partnership/roctorIs Coilrt Office Bldg.. Ro_,te 7L : The entrance is adequate for the proposed development. Precious improvements and dedication of right of way arein accordance with the proposed plans for i-pro:-ement of -Hydraulic Road. The onsight drainage needs to be shown at the intersecting roads of tie r:arking . lot. I believe those pipes currently flow wider the entrance to the south to a pro- posed.pickup to be constructed by the Highway Department with=ydraulic Road improve- ments. The new parking lot area shows a rip rap ditch with crainage leading to the existing ditch line. This parking area should be graded to drain to the northern end and an inlet placed to tie in with the existing 1211 corrugated metal pipe leading from the upper parking area. 30) Layne Final Plat, Route 750: Sight distance is adequate for private entrance. Sight distance could be improved to commercial standards, if necessary. 31) ZMA 79 13, Ttr n Group RPN (Jessup Property) Route 654, Barracks Rd._: The entrance location sho,,nm appears to have adequate sight distance. t+e woud recom- mend widening along the development side of the road to accommodate a left turn lane for vehicles leaving Charlottesville headed northwest. A commercial entrance will be required for this connection. 32) ZMA-79-18. Jarman Gap RPN, Route 641& 681: The entrance locations have not been examined at this time to see if they have adequate=sight distance. We would recommend that no access be allowed to Route 691 or Route 684 directly from the adjacent lots. We recommend that the frontage of both roads be improved placing the shoulder catch point at 15' from the center of the existing road and the ditch at 181. The deceleration lane should be 12' wide, 200 feet long with a 200' taper on all en- trances. Sufficient right of way for the turn lanes _should be dedicated. Y e