Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWPO201800007 Plan - Stream Buffer Mitigation 2019-05-09RIVANNA VILLAGE: BUFFER MITIGATION PLAN RIVANNA VILLAGE AMENDMENT & P11ASE 11 PHASE II ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA WPO 01800007 BUFFER MITIGATION AND STREAM RESTORATION PLAN r' 1 ALBEMARLE COUN I Y VIRGINIA Blossom Consulting and Engineering Inc. 1101 Professional Drive, Suite G Williamsburg VA 23185 p: 757-870-4825 �• SHEET INDEX PROJECT NARRATIVE --s� : K �'•. ! �•. J _ :: t C .� a1 Y •` •` _ � THE PROPOSED BUFFER MITIGATION STRATEGY INCLUDES PRESERVATION OF LARGE TRACTS OF i "� �•. ` '�, 1.) COVER `'• FORESTED BUFFER AND ENHANCEMENT OF FORESTED TRIBUTARY CORRIDORS LEADING TO THE - r 2. BUFFER MITIGATION MASTERPLAN PROJECT MAIN STEM ON WHICH THE COUNTY BUFFER IS MAPPED. BY PROTECTING AND ENHANCING THESE �• `. `. `•. < •� 3.) EXISTING CONDITIONS (STREAM RESTORATION) CORRIDORS, THE OVERALL CONDITION OF STREAM BUFFERS IS MAINTAINED AND IMPROVED. THE �.` . ,;, `•• BUFFER MITIGATION MASTERPLAN IS PRESENTED ON SHEET SR-2, HEREIN. TRIBUTARY #2: a % , . : n ti BUFFER PRESERVATION `k �•, i` i �,, 4•) STREAM RESTORATION MASTERPLAN ,. 5•) STREAM RESTORATION PLAN AND PROFILE IN ADDITION, THE PROPOSED BUFFER MITIGATION PLAN FOR PHASE 2 OF RIVANNA VILLAGE �" f� y�*4 /i a `••�'�O 6.) STREAM RESTORATION CROSS SECTIONS ' a INCLUDES STREAM RESTORATION USING NATURAL DESIGN TO MITIGATE FOR THE IMPACTED BUFFER '% ' _ •`'' t - RT 7•) STREAM RESTORATION NOTES AND DETAILS (i) BUFFER EQUIVALENCY IS CALCULATED ON A WATER QUALITY BASIS, UTILIZING THE NUTRIENT t • J` BUFFER ,, 2 �,".-:. rx? '-;, ,. R PRESERVATION REDUCTION ASSOCIATED WITH 37 FEET OF THE DESIGNED 37o FEET OF STREAM RESTORATION TO A1.. S° 8.) STREAM RESTORATION NOTES AND DETAILS (2) _ MITIGATE FOR THE REDUCTION OF NUTRIENT REMOVAL CAPACITY ASSOCIATED WITH THE IMPACTED F `) , 'r, r r : ..< -• - `• A, EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN BUFFER. DETAILED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS ARE PROVIDED ON SHEET SR 3 AND SR-4. 90� ��, ��• lo.) EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES /��\� �.• yrr r. Z. SPECIFICALLY, THIS PLAN ADDRESSES: ,.,. .• 11.) STREAM RESTORATION PLANTING PLAN .� ♦ ♦♦ TRIBUTARY #3: BUFFER PRESERVATION 12. HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS 1.) STREAM RESTORATION AND BANK STABILIZATION USING NATURAL CHANNEL DESIGN �\ �a ) �` '` "''` PRINCIPLES, METHODS AND TECHNIQUES , \ �`• �, 2.) RIPARIAN BUFFER ENHANCEMENTS AND BUFFER CREATION ALONG THE TRIBUTARY 1 CORRIDOR .! ` \ ` , ! •. KEY PLAN USING BIOENGINEERING (I.E. LIVE STAKES) AND NATIVE LANDSCAPE PLANTINGS. S �� .� sue'-� ,�, " `r SITE DATA 3.) HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS COMPLETED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE PROPOSED �, : ` '• RESTORATION DESIGN. �' .�, >� �� ' �. STREAM RESTORATION �� • `� PROJECT LIMITS = 0.63 ACRES A.) HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS COMPLETED USING TR-55 METHODOLOGY IN BENTLEY'S POND PACK -EXISTING BUFFER STREAM PER . AND EVALUATION OF REGIONAL CURVES AND REGRESSION EQUATIONS —- ( `� ; • �, ' •�.•` ALBEMARLE COUNTY • ••�'•�, B.) HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS COMPLETED IN U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEER'S HEC-RAS - A��>p ;.1 N \ � , � �• , ` � .. • / � LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE (PROJECT LIMITS) FOR 4.) WATER QUALITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS USING CHESAPEAKE BAY PRESERVATION ". •' / ! / / j • n� STREAM RESTORATION ACTIVITIES ARE LOCATED ACT GUIDANCE IN CONJUNCTION WITH EPA S EXPERT PANEL RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PROTOCOL #1: :^:;.: ;-,,� �- � •, � . � /� \\, � � /: � - "'� ;F ; „* BANCS METHOD FOR CALCULATING NUTRIENT REDUCTION ASSOCIATED WITH BANK STABILIZATION .� • • '� � ` / � �`• WITHIN THE LIMITS OF PHASE 1&2 DEVELOPMENT, ACTIVITIES. /) AND ARE COVERED UNDER THE PHASE SWPPP 1&2 THIS PLAN IS DESIGNED TO PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION PARAMETERS FOR TRIBUTARY #1: STREAM RESTORATION: STREAM RESTORATION NECESSARY TO STABILIZE A PREVIOUSLY DEGRADED STREAM SYSTEM } �— — � % / IDENTIFIED IN USACE PERMIT # WP4-13-123o AS REQUIRING RESTORATION AND APPROVED AS A / ISSUE TEMPORARY IMPACT TO WATERS OF THE U.S. SURVEY AND BASE INFORMATION REV # DATE DESCRIPTION PROPOSED STREAM RESTORATION PRACTICES INCLUDE: 1.) MODIFICATIONS TO CHANNEL GEOMETRY, PATTERN AND PROFILE DESIGNED TO REPLICATE ROUDABUSH ' � ,_ •—�` " ; � � � � � �� ' � �- , GALE & ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 3/2/2018 PER COUNTY COMMENTS CONDITIONS IDENTIFIED IN AN ON -SITE STABLE REFERENCE REACH. s --�' n �? - • 914 MONTICELLO ROAD 2.) CHANNEL RELOCATION IN SELECT AREAS AS NEED ABANDON TORTUOUS MEANDER BENDS AND ` '�_ •� • ' �. '� i ' / CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 22902 ATTAIN A STABLE STREAM PATTERN ALIGNED WITH THE EXISTING VALLEY 9 2 4/16/2018 PER COUNTY COMMENTS PHONE: (434) 976-0205 IN GRADE CONTROL MODIFIED CROSS VANES, ROCK SILLS) AND HABITAT 3.) -STREAM (I.E. - I ENHANCEMENTS DESIGNED TO CREATE STABLE STREAM FACETS (I.E. RIFFLES, POOLS) AND . -_ ^ ' � r \ r' I I\\� DYNAMIC EQUILIBRIUM. � rrrrrv` ` �•• • r ••i•' BOUNDARY SURVEY: ROUDABUSH, GALE & ASSOCIATES (434) 977-0205 ' `, ,•i•• 4.) STABLE TRANSITIONS UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM OF THE PROPOSED CULVERT (SEE CIVIL SITE TRIBUTARY #5: TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY: LOUISA AERIAL SURVEYS, 20o8 (540) 967-1499 `� FIELD VERIFIED BY ROUDABUSH, GALE &ASSOCIATES IN 2014 DESIGN PLANS PROVIDED BY ALAN FRANKLIN P.E. FOR DESIGN DETAILS) BUFFER PRESERVATION ,' j••�• -:::.• PERMIT INFORMATION F � jp ���PL o o TEMPORARY IMPACTS FOR STREAM RESTORATION AND PERMANENT IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH DEVELOPMENT, STREA,M CROSSINGS o SCOTT C. BLOSSOM AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES WERE PREVIOUSLY Lie. No. 40287 PERMITTED AND APPROVED UNDER PERMIT # WP4-13-1230. ALL �0- ASSOCIATED MITIGATION CREDITS WERE PREVIOUSLY PURCHASED N AND APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AND THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS `sIONAL (DEQ) (USAGE). Job No: 1005 Drawn By: BCE SCALE: 1 INCH - 20o FEET Date: 12.4.2017 Checked By: Scott C. Blossom, P.E. COVER 01 2001 400' $00' APPROVED by the Albemarle County CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2 FT Community Development Department Date 5/9/2018 File WP0201800007 ROME AN Its � � � r r 1 • � • 1 r r• r• 1 r Ir • r • 6` ,I��.il I, of ! • • ' - 1 : r •♦ • 1 • , . 1 � • • � r r r r r ` � ,�.',�� • 1 ice. �1, �., i"� ar �. • ' � � � �� \ ♦ to li I '� . .wr `e.'`\�,1��!' �j 1 � . t�IIILi :., �I/v � � �` b I r`� � i r ; r r 1 • r r ; ♦ r ♦1 r r �\ � �'','d F. r ;fir ' `. ♦ �` 1`°j ������' � ���� =��� �� O� � . \1 ♦: iJ',, ��� �� � ������ r' � Ors ill �� f, WE Slim � ♦.Q�o �� .� �:� iii NE ►� tt� /<`�•� ���� � ^ . `+; 0� —i �I, to � � ^�I4W � ���'������ • �•,��., / !�'', . 1s a. 0 p . ,► \, ,> �� .; Q ♦ ` \ o�. �' �' Vim,. OWN NVIT's—D MITI "WRI i+' `, II I ♦. � ., of �� � f I , "�+� \I' �I��� / .,�,,. .i. ��� /ice � e�� /�/ /.0 _ 0-.ii , i . :��/�v,i � .�sl!>� `i � : �'v � ��j1 �. �\��a� i � VP �i. ��. ��` ��• sa� ,., �O\� — -_MORIN MOMS ���� � � � �/r1's>� e���I/ �, / � �r \ � "� — ��������■■�� '♦rii•���� �e,�� madmomm WANE `Qli, �' I 1������� .� i y���• • Lw� ,!�\ ®��'I/ �si..A O� ■ I■K__`` -,■■■ ' 1 \•Ib A_1�;1 ` 1EMISSION , iIC4 mvh `/s +� �Ay/I////,I� ry i • f • An, IP�!$�1��,.,__ ,..._.r..i ■■■■IL��R.:�\� '� � 1-,■fffV■®::■� � i��. 1'' � 1 . . • • , . � �- li � �■�.■,�� � I���■, $ � ��" 11. �►. O � �1%�� �� ���� ���>�a/'` -'�� � e� � � � , . G. .� �0�, a,, �_ ,l' Icy: _ • � PA ` ��Y NONEI d II rf�'l'r4 '� �0� ��M�'Irt,r�/�c ♦ �� ' �♦ A�A�lS"tld5:,� 0 -�� �:lrir■■■■■, _ /I�� • 1 IMEN • r r . . r • r • • 1 1 • • AIT I fill" 41 • r♦• 1 1 1 ♦' ♦' '• ' �a°�.-' '1� /���;� �� ,ems ���� / // r r • r r r• 1 r • r r • 1 • • r • . • • . • • i 1 I ' EXISTING WATER LINE CROSSING AS - PREVIOUSLY APPROVED UNDER SEPARATE COVER. CONTRACTOR TO STABILIZE TRANSITION TO NATURAL STREAM CHANNEL DESIGN IF NEEDED AS APPROVED BY / / \ \36 6 ENGINEER. Jim r OP e � ee `e � e eft ft e e \� EXISTING SANITARY SEWER CROSSING AS •`•e APPROVED IN PHASE i SITE PLANS (SEE CIVIL S ••• DESIGN PROVIDED BY ALAN FRANKLIN P.E. \ FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION � � S EXISTING TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING AS APPROVED IN PHASE 1 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN. SEE CIVIL SITE DESIGN PLANS AND PHASE 1 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANS FOR APPROVED STREAM CROSSING, ROAD AND BRIDGE DESIGN. i' N SCALE: 1 INCH = 3o FEET 0' 3 0' 6 o' go, ♦ , CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2 FEET i ? o ti `S DSO EXISTING HEADCUT AND VERTICAL INCISION 360 PREVIOUSLY APPROVED ROAD CROSS AND PERMANENT STREAM CHANNEL IMPACTS (PERMIT # WP4-13-1230). MITIGATION CREDITS WERE PREVIOUSLY PURCHASED AND APPROVED. NOTE: PROPOSED STREAM RESTORATION ACTIVITIES ARE LOCATED WITHIN PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TEMPORARY STREAM CHANNEL IMPACTS AREAS EXISTING DEBRIS JAM EXISTING ACCELERATED LATERAL BEND MIGRATION EXISTING CONDITIONS AND BANCS REACH SUMMARY 40�' 4 �4A41 OR05� 4� / \4� 5 CD LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE / STUDY AREA SOILS SUMMARY TABLES WATER TABLE MAP HYDROLOGIC SURFACE KSAT UNIT SOIL NAME SLOPE SOIL GROUP RUNOFF UPPER LOWER (IN/HR) B LIMIT 2.0-3.5 LIMIT >6.0 0.57 - 1 B ABELL SILT 2 - 7 % MEDIUM LOAM 1.98 46B 2 - 7 % C HIGH 1 1 00 SILT LOAM .0-2.5 .8-3.0 06 MANTEO 5 CHANNERY 2 - 7 % C/D LOW 1 98 _ SILT LOAM 5.95 1 98 - MANTEO 51 C CHANNERY 7 - 15 % C/D LOW - - r' yr' SILT LOAM 62B NASON 2 - 7 % C MEDIUM - - 059 SILT LOAM 18 W WATER - - - - - - SOIL SURVEY GEOGRAPHIC (SSURGO) DATABASE FOR ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VA SOURCE: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION SERVICE LEGEND PROPOSED LIMITS OF HIGH BEHI `.•�• DISTURBANCE (STREAM MODERATE NBS RESTORATION PROJECT AREA) SITE BENCHMARK VERY HIGH BEHI (PER ROUDABUSH, GALE AND � MODERATE NBS ASSOC. SURVEY) EXISTING WETLANDS (PER KIRK HUGHES & ASSOC. VERY HIGH BEHI SURVEY) HIGH NBS EXISTING STREAM CHANNEL LIMITS MODERATE BEHI (PER KIRK HUGHES & ASSOC. MODERATE NBS Air•�. SURVEY) • ••e EXISTING POND APPROVED (PER KIRK HUGHES &ASSOC. ) PERMANENT STREAM SURVEY) IMPACT LIMITS Air APPROXIMATE EXISTING WATER EXISTING TREE LINE i (PER KIRK HUGHES & ASSOC. LINE APPROVED i SURVEY) PER PHASE 1 PLANS ,•, � �� � EXISTING TEMPORARY QEXISTING • 'I'S SANITARY LINE ♦ • STREAM CROSSING • � PER PHASE 1 PLANS p3 p4 y � • ee,h � e, • e � O � ee O� 4� I EXISTING SIDE CHANNEL IN STABLE CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED. I EXISTING CONDITIONS SUMMARY THE EXISTING STREAM CHANNEL WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE PROPOSED RESTORATION REACH IS CHARACTERIZED BY EXTREME BANK EROSION, VERTICAL INCISION AND ACCELERATED LATERAL BEND MIGRATION. IN SELECT LOCATIONS, BANK HEIGHTS APPROACH 6 FT AND ARE LACKING VEGETATIVE COVER. IN ADDITION, LOCALIZED DEBRIS JAMS HAVE CREATED HEADCUTS IN CHANNEL, RESULTING IN VERTICAL GRADE CHANGES AND DISRUPTION OF NATURAL STREAM FACET SEQUENCING. THE EXISTING REACH HAS LIMITED DEEPS POOLS AND ASSOCIATED RIFFLE AREAS, AND LIMITED IN STREAM HABITAT DUE TO SEDIMENT DEPOSITION AND UNSTABLE GEOMETRY. AS A COMPONENT OF THE EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS, A ROSGEN STREAM CHANNEL CLASSIFICATION WAS COMPLETED INDICATING THAT THE STREAM CLASSIFIES A'TYPE G' CHANNEL WITH THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTICS: - ENTRENCHMENT RATIO =1.2 - WIDTH/DEPTH RATIO = 8-10 - SINUOSITY = - SLOPE RANGE = 0.02-0.04 - CHANNEL MATERIALS = SANDY/GRAVEL WHILE IN SELECT LOCATIONS THE STREAM CHANNEL IS BUILDING AN INNER BAR FEATURE INDICATING THAT A NEW BANKFULL GEOMETRY IS BEING ESTABLISHED, THE DISCONNECTION FROM AN ACTIVE FLOODPLAIN HAS CREATED CONDITIONS THAT WILL CONTINUE TO ERODE THE BED AND BANKS AT AN ACCELERATED RATE, CAUSING DOWNSTREAM SEDIMENTATION AND CHANNEL DEGRADATION. THE CHANNEL WAS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED FOR STREAM RESTORATION IN CONSIDERATION OF ASSESSMENTS USING THE UNIFIED STREAM METHODOLOGY (USM) IN COORDINATION WITH REGULATORY PERMITTING. BANK ASSESSMENT FOR NON -POINT SOURCE CONSEQUENCES OF SEDIMENT SUMMARY (BANCS) IN ORDER TO CHARACTERIZE EXISTING STREAM CHANNEL AND BANK CONDITIONS AS THEY RELATE TO ASSOCIATED BANK EROSION, BLOSSOM CONSULTING AND ENGINEERING INC (BCE) COMPLETED EVALUATIONS OF THE BANK ERODIBILITY HAZARD INDEX (BEHI) AND NEAR BANK STRESS (NBS) IN THE EXISTING STREAM CHANNEL. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY'S EXPERT PANEL RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PROTOCOL #1, THE BEHI AND NBS VALUES WERE UTILIZED TO QUANTIFY PROJECTED EROSION RATES FOR SPECIFIC BANKS ALONG THE RESTORATION REACH. BANK LENGTHS AND BANK HEIGHTS WERE MEASURED IN THE FIELD AND SEPARATED INTO REACH SEGMENTS BASED ON SIMILAR CHARACTERISTICS (BANK HEIGHTS) AND EVALUATED FIELD PARAMETERS (I.E. BEHI AND NBS) FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS ANALYSIS, THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICES BANK EROSION RATE CURVES WERE UTILIZED AND ARE SUMMARIZED BELOW IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE RESULTS OF THE BEHI AND NBS ASSESSMENT. USING THE PROJECTED EROSION RATES, THE VOLUME OF SEDIMENT TRANSPORTED ON AN ANNUAL BASIS WAS QUANTIFIED, AND THE ASSOCIATED NUTRIENT LOADING CALCULATED. BASED ON THIS ANALYSIS OF EXISTING STREAM CHANNEL CONDITIONS IN THE RESTORATION REACH,12o TONS OF SEDIMENT ARE EXPECTED TO BE DELIVERED TO DOWNSTREAM RECEIVING WATERWAYS PER YEAR, WITH AN ASSOCIATED 63 POUNDS OF TOTAL PHOSPHORUS BOUND TO THE SEDIMENTS. AS SUMMARIZED ON SHEET 4: STREAM RESTORATION MASTERPLAN, THE PROPOSED STREAM RESTORATION IS EXPECTED TO PREVENT THIS SEDIMENT FROM MIGRATING DOWNSTREAM AT A 50 % REMOVAL EFFICIENCY. PROTOCOL #1: Bank Assessment for Non -point Source Consequences of Sediment (BANCS) Stream: Date Tributary to Main Stem 11/13/2017 Location:. fiivanna Village Observer: Scott C. Blossom P.E., CFfA Bank Erosion Curve USfWS (1} (4) M (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Reach ID BEHI rating (Worksheet PI - BEHI) ladjectivej NBS rating IWorksheet PL- NBS) (adjective) Bank erosion rate(Worksheet PI -Eros Curves) (ft/yr) Total Length of affected banks) (ft), Study bank height (ft) Erosion subtotal ((6)x(7)x(8)I [ft'/yr) Erosion Rate (tonslyr} (at 125lbs/cl bulk density) 1 High Moderate 0.6 263 5 789.00 49.31 2 High Moderate 0.6 55 4 132.00 8.25 3 Very High Moderate 0.7 67 5 234.50 14.65 4 Very High Moderate 0.7 82 4 229.60 14.35 5 Very High High 1 110 4.5 495.00 30.94 6 Moderate Moderate 0.08 1 80 1 4 25.60 1.60 7 Moderate Moderate 1 0.08 1 82 1 3 19-68 1.23 Total Stream bank length affected Total Stream Bank (L.F.) 739,00 Erosion subtotals in column (9) for each BEHI/NBS combination Total Erosion (ft'lyr) 1 925-38 Erosion in yds3/yr Total Erosion (yds'!yr) 71.31 Erosion in tonslyr Total Erosion (tonsryr) 120.34 Erosion per unit length of channel bank Total Erosion (tonsiyrlft) 0.183 Source: This worksheet was adapted trom Wildland Hydrology. The book titled watershed Assessment of River Stability and Sediment Supply (WARSSS) by Dave Rosgen and Hilton Lee Silvey should be referenced for additional background, explanations, and context PROTOCOL #1: Prevented Nutrient Erosion - Total Phosphorus Stream: fnbutary Nl: Ic IAain Stern Location: Rivanna Villap Phase 2 Station: Reach 1 and Reach 2 Observer: Scott C. Fmossvm P-E., [FM Date 11113/2017 zam Restora,.lon Efficiency per CBP Protocol So% Default Cwwritrations CBP Default Conc. of P in soil 525 ppm As weight per ton of sediment 1.05 Ibs P per ton of sediment IL) (2) (3) (4) (Sj (6) Prevented P Length of prevented P Total Prevented Prevented P €rosion Credit w/ Erusion Credit R.•.�ch 14 Aflected sediment Erosion €rosion Reductlnn Factor wj Reduction Itonslyrl llbs/yrl Factor par ft banks (lF) {Ih z, tributary to] 739 120.34 126.3S $3.18 0.485 Total Pre RIVANNA VILLAGE: BUFFER MITIGATION PLAN PHASE II ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA SCE Blossom Consulting and Engineering Inc. 1107 Professional Drive, Suite G Williamsburg VA 23185 p: 757-870-4825 KEY PLAN ISSUE REV # DATE DESCRIPTION �,LT H OF o f SCOTT C. Lic. No. BLOSSOM a 40287 o �sS10NAL w4� ���1 Job No: 1005 Drawn By: BCE Date: 12.04.2017 Checked By: Scott C. Blossom, P.E. EXISTING CONDITIONS (STREAM RESTORATION) PHOTO #1: LOOKING UPSTREAM IN REACH 1. STREAM REACH EXHIBITS SIGNS OF VERY HIGH EROSION RATES INCLUDING INCISION BENEATH ROOTING DEPTH, BANK SLUMP, AND STEEP BANK ANGLES. CHANNEL LACKS STABLE STREAM FACETS (I.E. RIFFLES, POOLS) AND LACKS IN STREAM HABITAT. PHOTO #2 LOOKING DOWNSTREAM AT REACH 2. FROM EXISTING TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING. STREAM REACH EXHIBITS SIGNS OF ACCELERATED LATERAL BEND MIGRATION AND DISCONNECTION FROM EXISTING FLOODPLAIN. CHANNEL IS ENTRENCHED AND LACKS IN STREAM HABITAT FEATURES. PHOTO #3 LOOKING DOWNSTREAM AT REACH 2 TOWARDS TRANSITION AREA BETWEEN PROPOSED RESTORATION ACTIVITIES AND MODERATELY STABLE REACH. NOTE LEFT BANK ANGLES APPROACHING go DEGREES AND ASSOCIATED BANK SLUMP. PHOTO #4 LOOKING AT RIGHT BANK EROSIONAL FEATURE WITH ASSOCIATED BANK HEIGHT OF APPROXIMATELY 3.5-4 FEET. NOTE EXPOSED ROOTS AND EROSION BENEATH ROOTING DEPTH. SURFACE PROTECTION MINIMAL. SR-3 7..S •I/ 900 X PROPOSED START OF TRANSITION REACH. STABILIZE TEMPORARY UTILITY CROSSING MATCHING DESIGN DIMENSIONS OF RESTORATION REACH. DESIGN PROVIDED \ UNDER SEPARATE COVER. + \ - + PROPOSED START OF STREAM RESTORATION ACTIVITIES, TRANSITION TO PROPOSED CHANNEL + DOWNSTREAM OF PROPOSED EASEMENT \ _ PROPOSED BOULDER TOE PROTECTION TO PROTECT \ I ADJACENT SANITARY SEWER (SEE DETAIL 4 SHEET / SR-7) \ \ T' EXISTING EXTREME STREAM BANK EROSION. CHANNEL TO BE ABANDONED STABILIZED AS BANKFULL BENCH AND RE -PLANTED oe HS2a WITH NATIVE VEGETATION (SEE DESIGN SECTIONS SHEET SR-6) ♦ \ LEGEND \ LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE FOR PROPOSED -'� STREAM RESTORATION CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE (SEE DETAIL 6, SHEET SR-8) EXISTING WETLANDS PROPOSE (PER KIRK HUGHES & ASSOC. PROFILE STATION SURVEY) (�IEXISTING STREAM CHANNEL PROPOSED BOULDER LIMITS (PER KIRK HUGHES & ° � °o ° CLUSTER (SEE DETAIL 5 ASSOC. SURVEY) ° SHEET SR-8) EXISTING CONTOURS PROPOSED I (PER KIRK HUGHES & ASSOC, STREAM RESTORATION SURVEY) (37o LF t) �) PROPOSED TREE LINE SEE PLANTING PLAN PROPOSED CROSS VANE SHEETSR (SEE DETAIL 2 SHEET SR-7) PROPOSED MODIFIED ) CROSS VANE PROPOSED ROCK SILL (SEE DETAIL 1 SHEET SR-7) (SEE DETAIL 3 SHEET SR-8) C >> A ';�" \ v v PROPOSED CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE OVER S >>> P \ SANITARY LINE (I.E. NO LARGE BOULDERS) TRANSITION TO CULVERT INLET (SEE DESIGN > ♦ ' PROFILE SHEET SR AND DESIGN DETAIL SHEET SR 8 INSTALL RIP RAP TOE AND BANK ~., NODE Og ,� + v .� I > \A \, \ \ / RESTORATION REACH 1= 210 FT (APPROX.) \ ICI SCALE: 1 INCH = 4o FEET 0' 40' 8o' CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2 FT PROPOSED BOX CULVERT UPSTREAM INVERT = 349 FT DOWNSTREAM INVERT = 348 FT ` LENGTH = 7o FT (SEE CIVIL SITE DESIGN PLANS PROVIDED BY ALAN FRANKLIN P.E. FOR ADDITIONAL DESIGN INFORMATION / RESTORATION REACH 2 =16o FT (APPROX.) I _5 #5> _ ). I PROTECTION io FEET UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM OF CULVERT (BOTH BANKS) SEE DETAIL 3 AND 5 SHEET SR-6) PROPOSED CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE OUTFALL PROTECTION DOWNSTREAM OF CULVERT OUTFALL TRANSITIONS TO NATURAL CHANNEL VIA PROPOSED MODIFIED CROSS VANE GRADE CONTROL STRUCTURE (SEE DETAIL > SHEET SR-7) S �» i PROPOSED TRANSITION TO EXISTING CHANNEL 0 _ — UPSTREAM OF CONFLUENCE WITH EXISTING SIDE CHANNEL / - x 356 � > _ — - -♦ ,-------- w, NODE S3h + EXISTING STREAM BUFFER PER ALBEMARLE COUNTY / x + i6o PROPOSED STREAM RESTORATION MASTERPLAN TYPICAL RIFFLE DIMENSIONS THE TYPICAL RIFFLE CROSS SECTION AS SHOWN IN REPRESENTATIVE CROSS SECTION A -A' PRESENTS THE DIMENSIONS OF THE PROPOSED CHANNEL IN THE RELATIVELY 'STRAIGHTSECTIONS OF THE RESTORATION REACH BETWEEN POOLS. THE RIFFLE WILL TRANSITION TO A 'RUNSECTION 3-5 FT BEFORE EACH POOL, AND BEGIN AT THE END OF THE 'GLIDE' SECTION 3-5 FT DOWNSTREAM OF EACH POOL. THE RIFFLE SECTION IS DESIGNED WITH A 2 FOOT WIDE 'BANKFULL BENCHAT 1 FT ELEVATION ON THE LEFT AND RIGHT BANKS. THE BANKFULL BENCH SHALL TRANSITION TO THE INNER BAR FEATURE IN EACH POOL SECTION (SEE TYPICAL POOL DIMENSIONS THIS SHEET). REFER TOT SHEET SR-5 FOR DESIGN ELEVATIONS ALONG THE CHANNEL. A 370 36o 350 0 PROPOSED GRADE (SEE DESIGN SECTIONS SHEET SR-6 AND CIVIL SITE PLANS) 28' EXISTING EXISTING GRADE I~ 16 ~I GRADE I� 12' �I -------- --------------------- 3 4.Q' \ �� PROPOSED } r _ _ BANKFULL PROPOSED BENCH GRADE EXISTING PROPOSED STREAM GRADE CHANNEL PROPOSED GRADE (SEE DESIGN SECTIONS SHEET SR-6 AND CIVIL SITE PLANS) 34 0 10 20 30 40 50 bo 70 8o go 100 DISTANCE (FT.) REPRESENTATIVE RIFFLE CROSS-SECTION A -A' VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 1o' HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 1o' * ELEVATIONS ON TYPICAL SECTION ARE FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY. SEE SHEET SR5 AND SR b FOR DESIGN ELEVATIONS TYPICAL POOL DIMENSIONS 36o O w w 350 A' NOTES: 1.) SEE SHEET SR-10 AND SHEET ES-17 AND ES-20 FOR CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE STONE ENTRANCE SHALL BE USED IF STREAM RESTORATION CONSTRUCTED SEPARATELY FROM OTHER SITE CONSTRUCTION. 2.) SEE SHEET SR-1 1 AND SHEET ES-20 FOR TEMPORARY/PERMANENT SEEDING 3.) SEE SHEET ES-20 FOR PUMP AROUND DETAIL THE TYPICAL POOL CROSS SECTION AS SHOWN IN REPRESENTATIVE CROSS SECTION B-B' PRESENTS THE DIMENSIONS OF THE PROPOSED CHANNEL IN THE MEANDER BEND SECTIONS OF THE RESTORATION REACH BETWEEN RIFFLES. THE DEEPEST PART OF THE POOL WILL GENERALLY BE LOCATED ON THE 'OUTER BEND,' AND THE TYPICAL POOL SECTION IS DESIGNED WITH AN 'INNER BARON THE INNER PORTION OF THE MEANDER BEND. THE TYPICAL POOL SECTION BELOW PRESENTS A 'LEFT OUTER BEND'. 'RIGHT OUTER BENDS' WILL MIRROR THE GEOMETRY SHOWN. THE INNER BAR SHALL MATCH THE BANKFULL BENCH ELEVATION OF THE RIFFLE TO ALLOW FOR BANKFULL FLOWS TO BE CONVEYED OVER THE INNER BAR. REFER TO SHEET SR-5 AND SR-6 FOR DESIGN ELEVATIONS ALONG THE CHANNEL. PROPOSED GRADE (SEE PROPOSED GRADE (SEE DESIGN SECTIONS SHEET DESIGN SECTIONS SHEET SR-6 AND CIVIL SITE PLANS) I 30' _ I SR-6 AND CIVIL SITE PLANS) EXISTING I EXISTING GRADE 16' IGRADE ------------- r-------------- 31 5.0' \ i� PROPOSED � \� _ �� GRADE }EXISTING STREAM CHANNEL TO BE FILLED WITH COMPACTED STRUCTURAL FILL (SEE NOTES PROPOSED PROPOSED SHEET SR-7) GRADE BANKFULL BENCH 08 3400 10 20 30 40 50 bo DISTANCE (FT.) REPRESENTATIVE POOL CROSS-SECTION B-B' B' 70 8o go 100 1o8 VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 1o' HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 1o' * ELEVATIONS ON TYPICAL SECTION ARE FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY. SEE SHEET SR-5 AND SR-6 FOR ACTUAL DESIGN ELEVATIONS BUFFER MITIGATION PLAN AS SHOWN ON SHEET SR-2, THE BUFFER MITIGATION PLAN INCLUDES A COMBINATION OF PROPOSED PRACTICES DESIGNED TO MITIGATE FOR THE PROPOSED IMPACTS TO THE EXISTING STREAM BUFFER MAPPED BY ALBEMARLE COUNTY. THE IMPACTED BUFFER IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF PHASE 2 CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND CONSISTS GENERALLY OF CANOPY TREES AND MODERATE UNDER STORY GROWTH WITH LIMITED HERBACEOUS COVER. IMPACTS TO THE EXISTING BUFFER WILL DECREASE ITS POLLUTANT REMOVAL CAPACITY AND HABITAT VALUE. IN ORDER TO MITIGATE THESE IMPACTS, TRIBUTARY BUFFER RESTORATION AND LANDSCAPE PLANTINGS ARE PROPOSED THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT AND RESTORATION OF A TRIBUTARY STREAM CHANNEL AND ITS ASSOCIATED CORRIDOR IS PROPOSED. THE PROPOSED STREAM RESTORATION ACTIVITIES PROVIDE SUFFICIENT NUTRIENT REDUCTION TO COMPENSATE FOR THE IMPACTED BUFFER ON A WATER QUALITY BASIS, AND NATIVE PLANTINGS ARE INCLUDED FOR ENHANCED HABITAT VALUE. THIS PLAN PRESENTS THE COMPONENTS OF THE PROPOSED STREAM RESTORATION PLAN AND PROVIDES THE DESIGN AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION. SEE THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN PROVIDED UNDER SEPARATE FOR ADDITIONAL PLANTING AND BUFFER RESTORATION ACTIVITIES THROUGHOUT PHASE 1 AND PHASE 2. STREAM RESTORATION DESIGN SUMMARY THE PROPOSED STREAM RESTORATION REACH (APPROXIMATELY 347 FEET) IS DESIGNED USING NATURAL STREAM CHANNEL DESIGN TECHNIQUES AS OUTLINED IN THE NATIONAL ENGINEERING HANDBOOK, CHAPTER 11, NATURAL STREAM CHANNEL DESIGN 40 STEP PROCEDURE. THE DESIGN WAS COMPLETED IN CONJUNCTION WITH HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS USING U.S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEER'S HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING CENTER'S RIVER ANALYSIS SOFTWARE (HEC RAS) WITH ROUTED POST DEVELOPMENT HYDROLOGY (SEE SR-12 AND HYDROLOGY SUMMARY BELOW). A COMBINATION OF ON -SITE REFERENCE REACHES IN FIELD IDENTIFIED STABLE SECTIONS OF STREAM ARE UTILIZED TO CALCULATE DIMENSIONLESS RATIOS FOR STREAM GEOMETRY AND STREAM FACET DESIGN (I.E. RIFFLE, POOL, GLIDE, RUN). REGIONAL CURVES AND UNITED STATES GEOLOIGIC SURVEY'S REGRESSION EQUATIONS ARE USED TO CALIBRATE DESIGN FLOWS. (SEE DESIGN FLOW SUMMARY BELOW). THE STREAM RESTORATION REACH IS DESIGNED TO PRODUCE A STABLE NATURAL STREAM SYSTEM THAT WILL FUNCTION IN DYNAMIC EQUILIBRIUM AND ENHANCE HABITAT. IN ADDITION, THE STREAM RESTORATION IS DESIGNED TO STABILIZE THE STREAM BANKS TO PREVENT EROSION AND ACCELERATED BEND MIGRATION. IN STREAM GRADE CONTROL FEATURES (I.E. MODIFIED CROSS VANES AND ROCK SILLS) ARE INCLUDED TO PROVIDE VERTICAL GRADE CONTROL AND CREATE DEEP POOLS FOR IN CHANNEL DIVERSITY. BUFFER EQUIVALENCY SUMMARY GIVEN THE LIMITED AREA AVAILABLE FOR RE -PLANTING OF STREAM BUFFER WITHIN THE MAPPED CORRIDORS, A COMPREHENSIVE STRATEGY FOR MITIGATING THE IMPACTED BUFFER IS PROPOSED. THE COMPREHENSIVE STRATEGY INCLUDES RE -VEGETATION AND LANDSCAPE PLANTING ALONG THE UN -MAPPED TRIBUTARY CORRIDORS, UP;AND LANDSCAPING AND NATIVE PLANTINGS, AND STREAM RESTORATION. IN ORDER TO QUANTIFY THE WATER QUALITY IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE BUFFER ENCROACHMENT AND QUANTIFY THE MITIGATION CREDIT ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROPOSED STREAM RESTORATION, BUFFER EQUIVALENCY CALCULATIONS WERE COMPLETED. WATER QUALITY IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE BUFFER ENCROACHMENTS WERE CALCULATED USING THE CHESAPEAKE BAY LOCAL ASSISTANCE DEPARTMENT'S INFORMATION BULLETIN #3 WHICH PROVIDES METHODOLOGY FOR CALCULATING THE POLLUTANT LOAD CAPABLE OF BEING REMOVED BY THE IMPACTED BUFFER. USING THE CALCULATION PROCEDURE OUTLINED IN INFO BULLETIN NO. 3 AND ASSUMING 3,030 FT OF IMPACT (LENGTH OF PERIMETER OF IMPACTED BUFFER), 43 INCHES OF ANNUAL RAINFALL, AND 100% REMOVAL EFFICIENCY, THE TOTAL WATER QUALITY BASED IMPACT TO VEGETATED BUFFER = 6.12 LBS TP/YR. TO MITIGATE THE POLLUTANT REMOVAL CAPACITY OF THE IMPACTED BUFFER, STREAM RESTORATION OF A TRIBUTARY CHANNEL IS PROPOSED. THE POLLUTANT REMOVAL CAPACITY OF THE RESTORED STREAM REACH IS CALCULATED USING BOTH THE 'DEFAULT RATE AND THE BANCS METHODOLOGY (SEE SHEET SR-3 FOR BANK ERODIBILITY ANALYSIS). A STREAM RESTORATION REMOVAL RATE OF 0.068 LBS TP/FT/YR WAS APPROVED BY THE CHESAPEAKE BAY PROGRAM OFFICE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA. THIS REMOVAL RATE EQUATES TO APPROX. 90 FT OF STREAM RESTORATION TO MITIGATE THE BUFFER IMPACT. USING THE BANCS METHODOLOGY DESCRIBED ON SHEET SR-3, THE PROPOSED NUTRIENT REDUCTION PRODUCED BY RESTORING 370 FEET OF HIGHLY DEGRADED CHANNEL IS 63 LBS TOTAL PHOSPHORUS/YEAR. THE NET BENEFIT OF THE PROPOSED STREAM RESTORATION FAR EXCEEDS THE IMPACTS TO THE BUFFER ON A WATER QUALITY BASIS, AND CREATES A NET POSITIVE 56 LBS OF ASSOCIATED NUTRIENT CREDIT. AS SUCH, COMPLIANCE IS ACHIEVED ON A WATER QUALITY BASIS AND THE OWNER AND/OR COUNTY MAY PURSUE NUTRIENT BANKING UNDER SEPARATE COVER. DESIGN HYDROLOGY IN ORDER TO APPROPRIATELY SIZE THE PROPOSED CHANNEL FOR NATURAL CHANNEL DESIGN, HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS INCLUDED EVALUATION OF TR-55 HYDROLOGY (SEE SWM-23 AND SWM-24 ON STORMWATER PLANS), REGIONAL EQUATIONS, AND USGS REGRESSION EQUATIONS. IN ADDITION TO THE BANKFULL FLOW, THE 2, 10, AND 100 YEAR STORM EVENTS WERE CONSIDER (SEE SHEET SR-10: HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC SUMMARY). STORM REACHI REACH EVENT (CFS) (CFS) NOTE: TR-55 METHODOLOGY UTILIZED FOR PEAK FLOW ESTIMATES WAS 1 YR 28.43 33.21 CALCULATED IN BENTLEY SYSTEM 2 YR 45.36 52.83 POND PACK, WITH ROUTED POST 5 YR 74.54 87.25 DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS. SEE 10 YR 99.14 114.36 STORMWATER PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL 25 YR 130.03 152.73 DETAILS AND ROUTED POST 50 YR 157.7 189.39 DEVELOPMENT FLOW RATES. 100 YR 190.77 228.30 REGIONAL CURVE (DOLL 2002, URBAN) Q = DISCHARGE R1 = 39.3 CFS R2 = 46.5 CFS A - FLOW AREA (BANKULL) R1 =7.2SF R2=8.6SF SELECTED DESIGN FLOW = 40 CFS (APPROX. 1.25 YEAR RETURN INTERVAL) (TR-55 NODE S3h) NOTE: USGS REGRESSION EQUATION FOR THE BLUE RIDGE REGION ESTIMATES 15 CFS FOR 2 YEAR DISCHARGE. GIVEN RURAL NATURE OF GAUGED STREAMS, THIS VALUE WEIGHTED LIGHTLY IN DESIGN FLOW ANALYSIS. HIGHER BANKFULL PEAK FLOWS ARE EXPECTED IN DUE TO THE PREVIOUSLY DEVELOPED CONDITION OF THE WATERSHED. RIVANNA VILLAGE: BUFFER MITIGATION PLAN: STREAM RESTORATION PHASE II ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA BCE Blossom Consulting and Engineering Inc. 1101 Professional Drive, Suite G Williamsburg VA 23185 p: 757-870-4825 ISSUE REV # DATE DESCRIPTION #1 1 3/2/18 IPER COUNTY COMMENTS #2 1 4/16/18 12ND ROUND CO. COMMENTS AjT H of O Gi SCOTT C. BLOSSOM Lie. No. 40287 ~A � Job No: 1005 Drawn By: BCE Date: 12.04.2017 Checked By: Scott C. Blossom, P.E. STREAM RESTORATION MASTERPLAN SR-4 FILEPATH:C:\Users\Owner\Dropbox\BCE Network\Projects\005 RivannaNEW\Design and Ana1ysis\CAD\005_BUFFER_MIT_PLAN_SR_20171110_REV2.dwgI0wnerIApr 12, 2018 at 15:461Layoul: 4 Maslerplan LL UhiN 1J w- "L I I \�vvIi ILv vvIII I l 111-11 1 v" II Nt vrvvLn ' l_ •• SEPARATE COVER). MINOR FIELD MODIFICATIONS AND � n / EXTENSION OF UPSTREAM TERMINUS ACCEPTABLE UPON EXTEND MODIFIED CROSS VANE SILL ACROSS ABANDONED ���♦ STREAM RESTORATION • • APPROVAL OF ENGINEER \\ \ \ CHANNEL. FILL IN ABANDONED CHANNEL TO PROPOSED PROJECT LIMITS (LOD) 1 \ \ \ \ BANKFULL ELEVATION ONLY. GRADE SLOPE TO MINIMUM 2.5:1 _- ON ABANDONED LEFT OUTER BEND. / • / / / EXISTING WETLANDS i \ 2\I \ ✓ (PER KIRK HUGHES &ASSOC. U�/ SURVEY) �• -� S1 - P • \ \ / INSTALL ROCK PLUG AT TERMINAL END OF ABANDONED / / EXISTING STREAM CHANNEL • ••• •.• / . �. \ 1 MEANDER BEND TO ALLOW STABLE DEWATERING OF LIMITS (PER KIRK HUGHES & • \ .• �• •• \ �! - ABANDONED MEANDER BEND UPSTREAM OF CULVERT / ASSOC. SURVEY) ���• � �',� � '��•����������� � •���••��••�� �.•••• .\ � CROSSING (SEE DETAIL 2 SHEET SR-8) . EXISTING CONTOURS .•♦o•' ```�'�•���`s ••.• \ � / / J (PER KIRK HUGHES &ASSOC. CO/ / SURVEY) •���`41W•� S �•````a �.•� A� PQ� PROPOSED CULVERT (SEE ♦Z ��� �' 2 f ``'• /� CIVIL SITE PLANS FOR X� •♦##4%p ��� / • DETAILS) P` •♦ ♦ \ / PROPOSED MODIFIED ♦♦♦♦♦ \ �♦ % CROSS VANE ••,/ ♦/ \ / (SEE DETAIL 1 SHEET SR-7) SCALE: 1 INCH = 20 FEET 0l 201 40' CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2 FT A 356 354 352 350 348 M PROPOSED CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE PROPOSED LIMITS OF GRADING (LOG) O PROPOSED BOULDER O� CLUSTERS PROPOSED STREAM RESTORATION (37o LF f) PROPOSED CROSS VANE (SEE DETAIL 2 SHEET SR-7) �\ PROPOSED BURIED ROCK SILL 1 / I (SEE DETAIL � SHEET SR-8) L PROPOSED STREAM RESTORATION PLAN AND LONGITUDINAL PROFILE B, o> p EXISTING GRADE O z z z o z+ o z + o z +" z° f +" o z A O? W r 01 A W W 00 N 1p PROPOSED MAXIMUM 18 INCH STEP O O O O O HEIGHT (TYP.) AT MODIFIED CROSS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o VANES S1, S2, AND S3. [Si PROPOSED ROADWAY ELEVATION 360-362 FEET (SEE CIVIL SITE PLANS FOR ROAD - PROFILE AND DETAILS PROPOSED BANKFULL BENCH ELEVATION REACH 2 CD O O O O O O O O - - - - - - _ PROPOSED GRADE i" PROPOSED STREAM SUBSTRATE ENHANCEMENT (SSE) (SEE DETAIL 8, SHEET CREATE SMOOTH TRANSITION FROM UPSTREAM STABILIZED 346 I REACH (ASSOCIATED WITH UTILITY CROSSING UNDER SEPARATE COVER). MINOR FIELD MODIFICATIONS AND EXTENSION OF UPSTREAM TERMINUS ACCEPTABLE UPON APPROVAL OF ENGINEER 344 O � 00 342I ro Iv 0 20 40 6o 80 100 LONGITUDINAL PROFILE (STATIONS o+oo - 4+46 VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 2' HORIZONTAL SCALE: I" = 20' 120 S3 140 16o 18o S4i 200 STRUCTURE TYPE STATION CREST INVERT S1 : MODIFIED CROSS VANE 0+25 355.6 S2: MODIFIED CROSS VANE 0+98 353.6 S3: MODIFIED CROSS VANE 1 +47 351.7 S4: CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE WITH ROCK SILL 2+02 349.4 S5: CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE WITH CROSS VANE 3+10 347.8 S6: BURIED ROCK SILL 3+34 347.7 S7: BURIED ROCK SILL 3+72 347.6 S8: BURIED ROCK SILL 4+12 347.4 4 FT HEIGHT INV. US = 349.0 F f SPAN WIDTH INV. = 348.0 FT 9 m LENGTH = 70 FT a gi O z z o SEE CIVIL SITE PLAN DESIGN FOR + + z DETAILS PROPOSED CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE UNDERLAIN WITH 1 FT CLASS 1 RIP RAP SUBLAYER (SEE NOTES, SHEET SR-7) PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER APPROX. ELEVATION FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY SEE CIVIL SITE PLANS FOR DESIGN DETAIL PROPOSED ROCK SILL TO BE INSTALLED MINIMUM 5 FT UPSTREAM OF SANITARY SEWER CROSSING. 220 240 26o 280 300 DISTANCE (FT.) 0 u y � S6 z IS7 z cQ + + S8 O O 320 340 36o 38o 400 420 TRANSITION TO STABLE CHANNEL UPSTREAM OF CONFLUENCE WITH SIDE CHANNEL. CREATE SMOOTH TRANSITION BY MATCHING EXISTING BENCH ELEVATION AND BANK ANGLE. MINOR MODIFICATIONS DUE TO DYNAMIC CHANNEL CONDITIONS REQUIRE FIELD APPROVAL BY ENGINEER e 7— APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF ON -SITE REFERENCE REACH USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH DIMENSIONLESS RATIOS ADAPTED FROM ROSGEN TYPE C4b CHANNEL IN SIMILAR VALLEY TYPE. REFERENCE WIDTH = 14 FT, REFERENCE MEAN DEPTH = 1.1-1.2 FEET. 46o 48o 500 520 540 56o 580 RIVANNA VILLAGE: BUFFER MITIGATION PLAN PHASE II ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA BCE Blossom Consulting and Engineering Inc. 1101 Professional Drive, Suite G Williamsburg VA 23185 p: 757-870-4825 KEY PLAN ISSUE REV # DATE DESCRIPTION ;��,LT H op 0 SCOTT C. BLOSSOM a Lie. No. 40287 ,-6O �SSI ONAL ��C'� Job No: 1005 Drawn By: BCE Date: 12.04.2017 Checked By: Scott C. Blossom, P.E. STREAM RESTORATION PLAN AND PROFILE SR-5 FILEPATH:C:\Users\Owner\Dropbox\BCE Network\Projects\005 RivannaNEW\Design and Ana1ysis\CAD\005_BUFFER_MIT_ PLAN_SR_20171110.dwglOwnerlDec 04, 2017 at 10:421LayouC 5 Plan and Profile 370 370 365 36o ` 355 EXISTING STREAM CHANNEL 3500 10 20 30 40 DISTANCE (FT.) CROSS SECTION STATION 0+02 VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 5' HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" =1o' 370 365 50 36o 355 PROPOSED �7: GRADE 350 I 0 10 20 30 40 DISTANCE (FT.) CROSS SECTION 0+42 VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 1o' HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" =1o' 370 365 36o 355 3500 10 20 CROSS SECTION o+81' 370 365 a PROPOSED GRADE 41 365 H a w m C 360 w 355 EXISTING STREAM CHANNEL 70 80 go 100 3500 10 20 30 40 DISTANCE (FT.) CROSS SECTION 1+90 VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 5' HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" =1o' a a a a 9 C N co m m C C C A N Nxx]] .x��Aaayy 50 6o EXISTING STREAM CHANNEL 70 8o go 100 9 Y Y Y Y y 9 � � Y a 1 0 01 00 0 w J R7 4 w I^�fJx]7 4 w I^�fJx]7 rrn < C4 S w A N m C N (o�ne7] m < C Cwn C4 C^�fn77 �f7] ^Afx]7 EXISTING STREAM / CHANNEL 30 40 50 6o DISTANCE (FT.) VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 1o' HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" =1o' 360 355 PROPOSE GRAC 3500 10 20 30 40 DISTANCE (FT.) CROSS SECTION 1+35 50 6o r PROPOSED GRADE 8o go 100 i i i 100, i EXISTING STREAM CHANNEL 70 80 go 100 365 36o Cn a m C N 355 350 a a a .. .. .. a / w T w 01 a 00 / C C C C C C C w w c PROPOSED GRADE 50 6o 70 80 go 100 Ch W y W c / W b � 2 4 / RAF 100,00 i PROPOSED GRADE EXISTING STREAM CHANNEL 345 ------ 0 10 20 30 40 50 6o 70 8o DISTANCE (FT.) CROSS SECTION 3+50 VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 5' HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" =1o' 365 36o 355 350 345 0 10 20 30 40 DISTANCE (FT.) CROSS SECTION 3+90 VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 5' HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" =1o' 36o 355 350 345 EXISTING STREAM CHANNEL 340 0 10 20 30 40 DISTANCE (FT.) CROSS SECTION 4+46 50 a a a a 00 co i m m J T 6o 70 8o a T m m 100 100 1 PROPOSED GRADE 50 6o 70 80 go 100 STREAM RESTORATION CROSS SECTION NOTES 1.) ALL SECTIONS OF THE RESTORATION REACH (BOTH REACH 1 AND REACH 2) SHALL RECEIVE STREAM SUBSTRATE ENHANCEMENT (SSE) AS SPECIFIED ON DETAIL 8 SHEET SR-8 AND AS SHOWN ON THE DESIGN PROFILE. SSE SHALL BE APPLIED TO THE CHANNEL BOTTOM OF THE CHANNEL UP TO THE BANKFULL ELEVATION AND SPAN THROUGH THE BANKFULL BENCH. 2.) THE CROSS SECTIONS DEPICTED ON THIS SHEET ARE REPRESENTATIVE CROSS SECTIONS AT KEY LOCATIONS ALONG THE RESTORATION REACH, CONTRACTOR SHALL INTERPOLATE BETWEEN CROSS SECTION STATIONS AND IMPLEMENT GRADUAL TRANSITIONS BETWEEN SECTIONS TO MEET DESIGN ELEVATIONS. GIVEN THE VARIABILITY IN STREAM CONDITION SINCE THE TIME OF SURVEY, FIELD MODIFICATIONS ARE ANTICIPATED AND SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE ENGINEER. 3.) ALL DISTURBED AREAS/SLOPES, (ABOVE BANKFULLAT 1 FT DEPTH) SHOWN ON THE CROSS SECTIONS ON THIS SHEET SHALL RECEIVE 6 INCHES OF TOPSOIL PRIOR TO SEEDING (SEE PLANTING PLAN SHEET SR-111) AND STABILIZING WITH COIR 700 MATTING. MATTING SHALL BE SECURELY KEYED INTO THE TOP OF THE BANK AND AT THE TOE BENEATH THE STREAM SUBSTRATE ENHANCEMENT. 4.) SEE CIVIL SITE DESIGN PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS RELATED TO THE PROPOSED CULVERT CROSSING AND INLET AND OUTLET PROTECTIONS. AS DETAILED HEREIN,CLASS 1 RIP RAP TOE AND BANK PROTECTION (MIN 2.2 FT DEPTH) SHALL BE INSTALLED 10 FEET UP AND DOWNSTREAM OF THE PROPOSED CULVERT CROSSING ON BOTH BANKS. SEE DETAILS 3 AND 5 SHEET SR-7. RIVANNA VILLAGE: BUFFER MITIGATION PLAN PHASE II ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA SCE Blossom Consulting and Engineering Inc. 1101 professional Drive, Suite G Williamsburg VA 23185 p: 757-870-4825 ISSUE REV # DATE DESCRIPTION ALT H op SCOTT C. BLOSSOM a Lic. No. 40287 ��SIONAL E��'ti Job No: 1005 Drawn By: BCE Date: 12.04.2017 Checked By: Scott C. Blossom, P.E. STREAM RESTORATION CROSS SECTIONS SR-6 VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 1o' HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" =1o' FILEPATH:C:\Users\Owner\Dropbox\BCE Network\Projects\005 RivannaNEW\Design and Analysis\CAD\005_BUFFER_MIT_ PLAN_SR_20171110.dwglOwnerlDec 04, 2017 at 10:43ILayoul: 6 Cross Sections VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 5' HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" =1o' SILL SHALL BE SILL SHALL BE KEYED IN MIN. 4 SECTION A -A' KEYED IN MIN. 4 FEET FEET / BANKFULL WIDTH 1 BANKFULL 2 ELEVATION 6 SLOPEVANE-OUT W a C7 SLOPEVANE-IN w � OUTER 3 4 I 5 , BANK / HEADER ROCKS FOOTER ROCKS ROCK SEAMS BETWEEN HEADER AND FOOTER ROCKS — SHOULD NOT ALIGN WHEAD .4� 7 SELECT STRUCTURES TIE ARMS TO %2 BANKFULL AND/OR INNER BERM ELEVATIONS INNER BANK ACC \ BACKFILL BEHIND THE STRUCTURE WITH ----------- \ COMPACTED FILL AND TOP TO BE FINISHED_ -"E-'" WITH RBM MIX AS PER THE TYPICAL RBM 7 INNER \ DETAILS AND TYPICAL SECTIONS BANK \ � 5= LEAVE FABRIC EXPOSED FOR INSPECTION, SILL SHALL BE =EAD AFTERWHICH CONTRACTOR TO TRIM KEYED IN MIN. �6 , FEET 5 B HEADER ROCKS CLASS I RIPRAP HEADER ROCKS FOOTER ROCKS — � ' SPLASH ROCKS B< C BANKFULL WIDTH __--POOL —B - CLASS I RIPRAP ARMORING _ - `_ A 2 OUTER BKF BANK EXTEND RIPRAP ARMORING 5 — FEET DOWNSTREAM OF OUTER VANE ARM AS DEPICTED UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN IN PLAN VIEW 1 SILL SHALL BE KEYED IN MIN. 4 FEET ARMORING C, NO GAPS BETWEE ROCKS LVANE—GUT SCOUR POOL TO BE CONSTRUCTED DURING INSTALLATION OF STRUCTURE. SEE PLAN VIEW AND PROFILE FOR POOL SIZES NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILF FABRIC FOOTER _ COMPACTED ROCKS _ _ _ _. FILL STRUCTURE DETAIL IS NOT TO SCALE AND ILLUSTRATIVE. ACTUAL NUMBER OF BOULDERS DEPENDS ON STREAM SIZE, AND IS ESTIMATED AT 8-io (PER COURSE) FOR THE STRUCTURE FACE AND ARMS (NOT INCLUDING SILLS) SYLAS1i STREAM FLOW STAKEOUT POINTS 3�4,5 SHALL ROCKS � LEAVE FABRIC EXPOSED FOR INSPECTION, BE CREST ELEVATION AFTERWHICH CONTRACTOR TO TRIM SCOUR WATER SURFACE ELEVATION SPECIFIED ON THE PROFILE. PROPOSED CHANNEL POOL 4 STAKEOUT POINTS 1,2,6 AND 7 THALWEG SHALL BE BANKFULL NUMBER OF SPLASH ROCKS IS — — — COMPACTED REINFORCED DETERMINED BY WIDTH OF BED MIX OPEN SPACE IMMEDIATELY DOWNSTREAM OF FOOTER = I 1 -III=III -I = BOULDER AND SIZE OF — — — _ — — NON -WOVEN AVAILABLE MATERIAL. REFER FOOTER GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TO BOULDER SIZING TABLE FOR ROCKS MINIMUM SPLASH ROCK SECTION B-B' COMPACTED CLAY FILL DIMENSIONS DETAIL: MODIFIED CROSS VANE NTS (ADAPTED FROM ROSGEN, WILDLAND HYDROLOGY) BANK TREATMENTS VARY ABOVE ROCK TOE PROTECTION (SEE PLAN AND DETAILS) EXTEND ROCK TOE PROTECTION A MINIMUM OF 1 FOOT ABOVE STREAMBED INVERT CLASS I RIP -RAP, D5o = 1.1 FT. MINIMUM DEPTH = 2.2 FT. STREAM SUBSTRATE ENHANCEMENT MIX SHALL BE INCORPORATED INTO THE P-RAP 2 FT MIN i-. =III= . 0 NORMAL BASE -III=1 1- FLOW ELEVATION III-III-III=1 - I- I I I- - I— - =�I 111=III=III=III= -III=III III=III—�1 fill HAND -PLACE SMALLER -III=III- III=11 MIN. 3.2'-11=III=11 RIP -RAP TO -III=1 I I=1 ti1,=1 I I= I!-1 I I-1 I I=1 I-III=1 11= I I=1 I I=1 11= -III-III-III III=1 l i . I=1 I I III=1 I I III=1 I I=1 I MINIMIZE VOIDSI- 1I III —I i I -I i 1-1 11-1 i I III -III I I III III III -III I I ExISTING I I III III I 11= III= NON -WOVEN III -III -III -III III 11=III=III=11 -III GEOTEXTILE = 111-III-III-III-III-I I sTREAMBED --I I 1=1 I 1=1 11= 111= III=1 I I=1 I I=1 I I=1 I I=1 11= ELEVATION =1 I I=1 I I=1 I I=1 I -- -I I I III -III -III -III -III -III -III —I I I_I I I—III-III=III=III=1 I I- 1I =1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 I I-1 I I-1 I I-1 I I-1 11=1 11=1 11=1 I I-1 I I-1 11=1 11= NOTES: TO BE INSTALLED ON O HIGH ENERGY AREAS UP AND DOWNSTREAM OF THE BRIDGE CROSSING (10 FEET UP AND DOWNSTREAM BOTH BANKS) CLASS II RIP -RAP MAY BE USED IF PREFERRED BY SELECTED CONTRACTOR BUT ALL VOIDS MUST BE FILLED WITH SMALLER MATERIAL. D1`1TAIL : RIP RAP TOE PROTECTION (ADAPTED FROM VESCH 3.19) LEGEND �5 STAKEOUT POINT STREAM SUBSTRATE ENHANCEMENT I--III=1 IN -SITU MATERIAL AND III III- COMPACTED FILL SILL SHALL BE KEYED IN MIN. 4 FEET SECTION A -A' WIDTH BANKFULL 1 2 ELEVATION SLOPEVANE-OUT I OUTER BANK HEADER ROCKS FOOTER ROCKS --- ROCK SEAMS BETWEEN HEADER AND FOOTER ROCKS SHOULD NOT ALIGN SILL SHALL BE KEYED IN MIN. 4 FEET 7 SILL SHALL BE KEYED IN MIN. 4 FEET SLOPEVANE-n I WHEAD 0 7 INNER BANK SELECT STRUCTURES TIE ARMS TO %2 BANKFULL AND/OR INNER BERM ELEVATIONS In INNER I BANK I LVANE-IN I _ 6 C' I B STRUCTURE DETAIL IS NOT TO A' - SCALE AND ILLUSTRATIVE. BANKFULL ACTUAL NUMBER OF WIDTH I BOULDERS DEPENDS ON I STREAM SIZE, AND IS —SCOUR ESTIMATED AT 8-io (PER POOi.= C - 5 II �/ ��0 COURSE) FOR THE STRUCTURF, \ ` B' � Ali FACE AND ARMS (NOT INCLUDING SILLS) DER — 4 WHEAD FOOTJD CKS EXTEND RIP - ROCKS ARMORING 5 FEET A AT LEAST ONE HEADER ROCK DOWNSTREAM OF REQUIRED AT SPILLOVER OUTER VANE ARM L /ANE-O' AS DEPICTED 2 — UNLESS B OTHERWISE SHOWN IN PLAN OUTER VIEW CLASS I RIPRAP 1 BANK NO GAPS BETWEEN ARMORING ROCKS - ALL GAPS TO BE SILL SHALL BE FILLED IN KEYED IN SCOUR POOL TO BE CONSTRUCTED MIN. 4 FEET SILL LOCATION AND INSTREAM DURING INSTALLATION OF STRUCTURE ARM TIE IN LOCATIONS STRUCTURE. SEE PLAN VIEW AND MAY BE FIELD ADJUSTED BY DESIGNER PROFILE FOR POOL SIZES TO AVOID SPECIMEN TREE ROOTS. HEADER ROCKS SPLASH STREAM FLOW LEAVE FABRIC EXPOSED FOR INSPECTION, ROCKS AFTERWHICH CONTRACTOR TO TRIM WATER SURFACE ELEVATION SCOUR POOL 4 _ COMPACTED PROPOSED REINFORCED CHANNEL BED MIX THALWEG COMPACTED CLAY FILL NON-WOVEN NUMBER OF SPLASH ROCKS IS DETERMINED GEOTEXTILE FABRIC BY WIDTH OF OPEN SPACE IMMEDIATELY FOOTER DOWNSTREAM OF FOOTER BOULDER AND SECTION B-B' ROCKS SIZE OF AVAILABLE MATERIAL. REFER TO BOULDER SIZING TABLE FOR MINIMUM SPLASH ROCK DIMENSIONS. DETAIL: CROSS VANE NTS (ADAPTED FROM ROSGEN, WILDLAND HYDROLOGY) PROPOSED COIR Too FABRIC NOTE: SLOPE VARIES, SEE CROSS SECTIONS, NO 1. IF BEDROCK IS PRESENT AT THE CHANNEL FINISH STEEPER THAN 2:1 SIDE SLOPE (UNLESS INVERT, FOOTER ROCK SHALL STILL BE REQUIRED UNLESS APPROVAL FOR GRADE OTHERWISE SPECIFIED) ELIMINATION OF FOOTER ROCK IS OBTAINED _ _ _ _ _ _ _ L ESTI_MATED_BANK_FULL ELEVATION FROM FAIRFAX COUNTY AND THE 1=III= =III _ _ — ENGINEER DESIGNER. FOR EXAMPLE, WHERE III=III=1 III= / =-1= I -III -III— BEDROCK IS FRIABLE AND WEATHERED AND III —III- -III-III= =III— HEADER ROCK CAN BE TRENCHED, FOOTER ROCK WILL BE III —III== =III—III=III= REQUIRED. IN AREAS WHERE BEDROCK IS III-III-III=1 I I -III -III -III -I I I 11=111=111-1 1=I ==1=1=1=1—I RESISTANT AND BLASTING WOULD BE III=1=1 III-III-III=1-III-' OFFSET SET REQUIRED, FAIRFAX COUNTY, IN =1=1 I-III=1=1=1=1-I L 6 TO 18 IN. COORDINATION WITH THE =III=III=III-III-III-ITI-1T 1 III= =III=III=III= _ _ _ _ _BANKFULL_ _ _ _ _ ENGINEER/DESIGNER, SHALL DETERMINE -11-1 I I -I I 1 I I 1 _ ELEVATION WHETHER OR NOT TO ELIMINATE FOOTER ROCK. III -I 11=1 I I I 11= III -III -III -I STREAM SUBSTRkTE SHOULD FOOTER BOULDERS BE REMOVED DUE =III=III=III= STREAMBED TO BEDROCK CONSTRAINTS, BOULDER SIZES =III=III= ENHANCEMENT SS INVERT SHALL BE UPDATED TO 3'x3'x2'. 1=1 ELEVATION AT CL =1II III=1I!: III III -III -II � J J — — FOOTER DEPTH 2.5' MIN 1111-11 LI 1-11�11�11�11_11�1-\/�X� NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE III=III=1 1=III=III =-_ / -1 I I -III -III III-III-III-III=1 I I- GEOTEXTILE FABRIC III= = = III=III=III= COMPACTED FILL (AS FOOTER ROCK —III-III=1=1 =III= NECESSARY) I - (SEE NOTE) IN -SITU SOIL 4 DETAIL: BOULDER TOE PROTECTION 7 (ADAPTED FROM VESCH 3.19 AND ROSGEN) STAKEOUT POINTS 3,4,5 SHALL BE CREST ELEVATION SPECIFIED ON THE PROFILE. STAKEOUT POINTS 1,2,6 AND 7 SHALL BE BANKFULL LEGEND \�. STAKEOUTPOINT .'ENHANCEMENT IN -SITU MATERIAL 1 COMPACTED FILL FINISH GRADE HAND -PLACE III —I SMALLER RIP -RAP - - -III-II TO MINIMIZE=I 1= VOIDS=11 NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC DETAIL: RIP RAP BANK PROTECTION (ADAPTED FROM VESCH 3.19 AND WEG) CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS 1. EXCAVATE TRENCH ALONG THE BOTTOM OF THE STREAM BED AND TO THE BANKFULL ELEVATION IN THE STREAMBANK FOR THE PLACEMENT OF THE VANE ARM. THE TRENCH SHOULD BE' BANKFULL WIDTH AND TO THE DESIGN ANGLE FOR THE VANE ARM PORTION. PLACE THE HEAD BOULDERS AT THE END OF THE VANE ARM IN ORDER TO ENCOURAGE LATERAL FLOW INTO THE EXCAVATED SCOUR POOL. NOTE: VANE MUST BE PROPERLY TIED INTO THE BANK AT THE SPECIFIED ELEVATION. 2. PLACE FOOTER AND SPLASH BOULDERS TO THE MINIMUM SPECIFIED FOOTER DEPTH. 3. PLACE HEADER ROCKS ON TOP OF FOOTER ROCKS SO THAT THE HEADER ROCK RESTS ON ONE HALF OF A FOOTER ROCK BELOW. OFFSET THE HEADER ROCK IN THE UPSTREAM DIRECTION AND PLACE SO THEY SLOPE SLIGHTLY AGAINST THE FLOW DIRECTION. 4. VERTICAL ROCK SEAMS BETWEEN HEADER AND FOOTER ROCKS SHOULD NOT ALIGN. 5. EXTEND THE STRUCTURE INTO THE BANK (I.E. SILL ROCKS) AND ARMOUR UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM FOR STABILITY WITH BED MIX AND COMPACTED FILL MATERIALS. 6. CREATE A SILL OF PLACED ROCK PERPENDICULAR TO THE STREAMBANK EXTENDING AWAY FROM EACH VANE ARM AND INTO THE BANK. 7. SEAL THE STRUCTURE ON THE UPSTREAM SIDE AS DESCRIBED BELOW. CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES i. ALWAYS USE EQUIVALENT OF AT LEAST ONE ROCK WIDTH FOR THE HEAD OF THE STRUCTURE. REFER TO STRUCTURE ROCK TABLE SIZING. 2. THE ROCK MATERIAL SHALL BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE IT IS PLACED. 3. ALL NATURAL GAPS ON UPSTREAM FACE OF STRUCTURE SHALL BE SECURELY CHINKED WITH SMALLER DIAMETER ROCK PRIOR TO COVERING WITH FILTER FABRIC AND BACKFILLING. 4. STRUCTURES MUST BE SEALED WITH FILTER FABRIC AND COMPACT REINFORCED BED MIX. REINFORCED BED MIX CAN BE COMPACTED 4 FT (MAX) IMMEDIATELY UPSTREAM AND AROUND STRUCTURE. 5. ENSURE NO LEAKAGE/FLOW UNDER OR AROUND THE STRUCTURE BY PROPERLY GRADING, SEALING, AND COMPACTING UNDER AND AROUND THE UPSTREAM SIDE (BACKSIDE) OF THE STRUCTURE ALONG THE VANE ARMS AND WEIR/HEADER ROCKS WITHIN THE CHANNEL AREA. 6. AFTER INSTALLATION, CHECK PROPER FUNCTION/FLOW PATH BY OBSERVING FLOW OVER THE STRUCTURE. *NOTE: FOOTER PLACEMENT TO BE APPROVED BY ENGINEER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF TOP ROCKS FOR ALL STRUCTURES. NOTE: REFER TO CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS FOR EARTH FILL REQUIREMENTS. PLAN VIEW DEPICTS A STRUCTURE IN A RIGHT MEANDER (WITH THE OUTER BANK ON THE LEFT AS YOU ARE LOOKING DOWNSTREAM). FOR A LEFT MEANDER STRUCTURE (WITH THE OUTER BANK ON THE RIGHT AS YOU ARE LOOKING DOWNSTREAM), THE PLAN VIEW IS A MIRROR IMAGE OF WHAT SHOULD BE CONSTRUCTED. THE LONGER VANE ARM IS ALWAYS SITUATED ON THE OUTER BANK. CONSTRUCTION NOTES AND DETAILS: FILL MATERIALS FILL MATERIALS SHALL MEET THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR TILV CONTAINED IN GEOTECHNICAL REPORT REFERENCED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. FILL MATERIALS CONSISTS OF EXISTING MATERIAL EXCAVATED FROM THE CHANNEL IN RELOCATION SECTIONS, AND IMPORTED SOILS OF ASTM 2487 CLASSIFICATION TYPE GW, GP, GM, SW, SP, GC, SC, ML, AND/OR CL FREE OF ROCK OR GRAVEL LARGER THAN 1 INCH IN ANY DIMENSION, DEBRIS, WASTE, FROZEN MATERIALS, VEGETATION AND OTHER DELETERIOUS MATTER. CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE CONSTRUCTED RIFFLES SHALL BE INSTALLED UP AND DOWNSTREAM OF THE PROPOSED CULVERT CROSSING AND WILL CONSIST OF THE STREAM SUBSTRATE REINFORCEMENT (SSE) UNDERLAIN BY 1 FT DEPTH OF CLASS 1 RIP RAP FOR A TOTAL DEPTH OF LINING OF 2.2 FEET. THE CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE SHALL BE INSTALLED TO PROPOSED DESIGN GEOMETRY OF THE TYPICAL RIFFLE SECTION SHOWN ON THE MASTERPLAN SHEET SR-4, WITH TRANSITIONAL BANK CONDITIONS AS SHOWN ON THE CULVERT DESIGN PLANS PROVIDED UNDER SEPARATE COVER. SEE PROFILE ON SHEET SR-4 FOR STATIONS, DESIGN ELEVATIONS AND LAYER THICKNESS. BANK TREATMENTS VARY ABOVE RIPRAP BANK PROTECTION (SEE PLAN AND DETAILS) EXTEND RIPRAP TO TOP OF BANK SLOPE VARIES, SEE CROSS SECTIONS, NO STEEPER THAN 2:1 SIDE SLOPE (UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED) CLASS I RIP -RAP, D50 = 1.1 FT. MINIMUM DEPTH = 2.2 FT. SSE MIX SHALL BE INCORPORATED INTO THE RIP -RAP, AT LEAST 0.5' ABOVE THALWEG 2 FT MIN 0 NORMAL BASE 1 FLOW ELEVATION Ill T=Tn_-� rI NOTE: 1. IF BEDROCK IS PRESENT AT THE CHANNEL INVERT, FOOTER ROCK SHALL STILL BE REQUIRED UNLESS APPROVAL FOR ELIMINATION OF FOOTER ROCK IS OBTAINED FROM FAIRFAX COUNTY AND THE ENGINEER/DESIGNER. FOR EXAMPLE, WHERE BEDROCK IS FRIABLE AND WEATHERED AND CAN BE TRENCHED, FOOTER ROCK WILL BE REQUIRED. IN AREAS WHERE BEDROCK IS RESISTANT AND BLASTING WOULD BE REQUIRED, FAIRFAX COUNTY, IN COORDINATION WITH THE ENGINEER/DESIGNER, SHALL DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT TO ELIMINATE FOOTER ROCK. SHOULD FOOTER BOULDERS BE REMOVED DUE TO BEDROCK CONSTRAINTS, BOULDER SIZES SHALL BE UPDATED TO 3'x3'x2'. 111=11=11MIN .3.2'=III=III \ 111-III III=1 EXISTING III -I I -III -I I -III-I I I- "�-1 11=1 11=1 11=1 I I 11= - STREAMBED = ELEVATION RIVANNA VILLAGE: BUFFER MITIGATION PLAN PHASE II ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA BCE Blossom Consulting and Engineering Inc. 1101 Professional Drive, Suite G Williamsburg VA 23185 p: 757-870-4825 KEY PLAN ISSUE REV # DATE DESCRIPTION �,jT H OF SCOTT C. Lic. No. BLOSSOM a 40287 �0111111111� �IS1SIONAL Job No: 1005 Drawn By: BCE Date: 12.04.2017 Checked By: Scott C. Blossom, P.E. STREAM RESTORATION NOTES AND DETAILS (1) SR-7 FILEPATH:Q\Users\Owner\Dropbox\BCE Network\Projects\005 RivannaNE\MDesign and Analysis\CAM005_ BUFFER _ MIT_ PLAN_SIR _20171110.dwg OwnerjDec 04, 2017 at 10.4611-ayout 7 Details (1) REFER TO PLAN FOR - STREAM BANK PROTECTION EXISTING OR NEWLY EXCAVATED CHANNEL DETAIL: ROCK PLUG COMPACTED FILL y�AT 2 FT X/ CLASS I RIPRAP 1=_ III=2 FT==1I=1I=1I=1I1- 2 FT III=III=III=I KEYTRENCH=1=1=1 1=1 11=1 I I I I 1=1 11=1 11=1 I I- J �' 1=, I I III -III -III III-1 11=1 I I -I 11=1 I I I I I -I IF IIII- 1=1=1 III=1-11I- 2 FTIII-1 =III=III III-III=III=III-II I - _ - _ - - - - -- VARIES SEE FLAN VIEW FOR UNDISTURBED DIMENSIONS SUBSTRATE NTS (ADAPTED FROM ROSGEN, WILDLAND HYDROLOGY & WEG) i. BOULDER CLUSTERS SHALL BE PLACED IN RIFFLE ZONES AND POOL AREAS TO CREATE FLOW DIVERSITY AND HABITAT COVER. PLACE BOULDERS (APPROX. 2' X 2' X 2') IN CLUMPS OF 3-4WITH APPROX. 3-6 INCH SPACE BETWEEN BOULDERS. EACH CLUMP SHALL BE 2-4 FEET APART AND PLACED IN ALTERNATING MANNER. BOULDER CLUSTERS WILL NOT REQUIRE A_FOOTER ROCK, BUT SHALL BE 'TAMPED' INTO THE STREAM SUBSTRATE ENHANCEMENT TO PREVENT ROLLING. NOTES: TOPSOIL PROPOSED COMPACTED BANKFULL FILL ELEVATION MATERIAL mil 2 FT EXISTING ABANDONED OR NEWLY//\�� `� CHANNEL EXCAVATED CHANNELCOMPACTED CLAY PLUG\ FT --I - , -III-I I_I 1-III =2 -III- 2 FT- III -III-I I_I I I -I I I -I I I -I 11 -11 1-111-111-111 I, �1 T 1-1 I -111=1 1=1 1=1 1= 1=III=III=III-III=III-III-III-III III=III=III=� III-III-KEYTRENCH= III III-III-11 I I 1=1 11=1 11=1 I I I I 1=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 I� __ ___ _ I-i I i I I 1=1 11=1 11=1 11= �=III=1 I I=1 I I=111=III=III=1 I I=11 I III=1 I I=11 I- J= 2� T I=_ =III-111-111-1 I I III=111=111=III=111=11 I T 1=1 T 1=T1=1 T 1=1 T 1=1 T 1=1 T 1=1 T 1=111=1 T 1=1 T 1=1 i _TI-T1-I T I 11-1 I I T I-1 1-111-111911-111-1 =1 =1 =1 III -III -III= VARIES SEE PLAN VIEW =1 =1 =1 =1 =1 =1 =1 II II IIWI I l III11-111=111=1 ==1 FOR DIMENSIONS CLAY PLUG SECTION _ IN -SITU MATERIAL DETAIL: CLAY PLUG NTS (ADAPTED FROM ROSGEN, WILDLAND HYDROLOGY & WEG) SECTION XS1* NTS *SEE TYPICAL RIFFLE DETAIL FOR DIMENSIONS STREAM CEMENT DETAILS =PTH OF E MIX. . %3 TO 2/3 OF BOULDER HEIGHT TO PROTRUDE ABOVE DESIGN INVERT ELEVATION 1. SIDE SWALE STABILIZATION IS INTENDED TO DIRECT OVER BANK FLOW TO MAIN STEM FROM EXISTING DEPRESSION FEATURES ENCOUNTERED DURING MAINSTEM GRADING. SEE PLAN VIEW FOR LOCATIONS. SELECT AREAS MAY REQUIRE FIELD IDENTIFICATION 2. SIDE SWALE TO BE GRADED TO A MINIMUM 3. BOTTOM WIDTH OF 4' AND A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 4:1. 4. AVOID DISTURBANCE TO EXISTING STABLE BANKS AND TREES. SSE SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED WHERE EXCAVATION TO ATTAIN FULL SPECIFIED THICKNESS WILL DAMAGE STABLE TREE ROOTS. STREAM CHANNEL MAINSTEM OR TRIBUTARY PROPOSED COMPACTED FILL IF NEEDED TO REACH STABLE SLOPE PROPOSED SIDE SWALE COIR THALWEG SSE MIX 12" DEPTH SECTION A -A' NTS DETAIL: SIDE SWALE STABILIZATION NTS (ADAPTED FROM ROSGEN, WILDLAND HYDROLOGY & WEG) BANKFULL NTS GRADE CONFLUENCE TO BLEND WITH MAINSTEM BANKS COIR MAT FAO MATTING AS 7 NOTE D ON THE EXISTING GRADE PLANS FIELD IDENTIFIED INFLOW FROM TRIBUTARY OR SEEP STREAM SUBSTR ENHANCEMENT NOTED IDETIL 8, S STRUCTURE ROCK SIZE SPECIFICATION TABLE MINIMUM X-AXIS MINIMUM Y-AXIS MINIMUM Z-AXIS STRUCTURE DIMENSION DIMENSION DIMENSION MODIFIED CROSS VANE, CROSS VANE, J-HOOK, STEP 2.5 FT 2 FT 2.5 FT POOL, ROCK STEP ARMORED STEP POOL ROCK SILL 2 FT 2 FT 2 FT SPLASH ROCK 3 FT 2 FT 2 FT BOULDER TOE PROTECTION 2.5 FT 2.5 FT 2.5 FT DETAIL: IN STREAM STRUCTURE BOULDER DIMENSIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS REFER TO PROFILE SHEETS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION COIR FABRIC A UPSTREAM ROCK PROJECTED ONTO CROSS-SECTION w r+nnn� REFER TO RESTORATION PLAN SHEETS FOR LOCATIONS CLAY PLUG AND FILL NOTES: 1. CLAY PLUGS SHALL BE PLACED IN LOCATIONS SPECIFIED ON PLANS WHERE THE EXISTING CHANNEL IS TO BE ABANDONED. 2. CLAY PLUGS SHALL BE "KEYED" INTO EXISTING BED MATERIAL AS TO PREVENT FLOW INTO ABANDONED CHANNEL, FLANKING, AND UNDERCUT. CLAY PLUG FILL SPECIFICATIONS: 1. COHESIVE MATERIALS CLASSIFIED AS ML, CL, MH OR CH PER ASTM D-2487 (SUBJECT TO COUNTY APPROVAL) INSTALLED IN 8 INCH LIFTS TO 85% COMPACTION 2. CLAY PLUG DIMENSIONS SHALL BE OF ADEQUATE WIDTH TO FILL EXISTING CHANNEL AND TO MATCH THE ELEVATION OF THE PROPOSED CHANNEL TOP OF BANK UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. CL REINFORCED BED MIX (SSE UNDERLAIN WITH 1 FOOT OF CLASS 1 RIP B' O RAP) PLACED ABUTTING SEWER EASEMENT TO CREATE SMOOTH AND STABLE TRANSITION OVER PIPE B- ! I BANKFULL WIDTH 1 CL SECTION A -A' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT UTILITY CROSSING LOCATION LEGEND STREAM SUBSTRATE ENHANCEMENT (SUB LAYER 1 FT CLASS 1 RIP RAP) IN -SITU MATERIAL TOPSOIL COIR MATTING BURIED ROCK SILL INSTALLED MINIMUM OF 5 FT PLAN VIEW UPSTREAM OF UTILITY CROSSING BANKFULL ELEVATION FLOW- SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT PLAN VIEW NTS Z ROCK AXIS DEFINITION X = DIMENSION PERPENDICULAR TO FLOW Y = DIMENSION PARALLEL TO FLOW Z = VERTICAL DIMENSION CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE SHALL CONSIST OF A 2.2 FT LAYER OF REINFORCED STREAM BED CONSISTING OF SSE AND CLASS 1 RIP RAP, EACH 1.1 FT THICK. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTION OF UTILITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION UTILITY CROSSING LOCATION (REFER TO CIVIL SITE PLAN FOR LOCATION DETAILS.) GENERAL STRUCTURE NOTES: ALL STRUCTURE ROCK SHALL BE PLACED SO THAT TOPS OF THE ROCK (AND AS MUCH OF THE ROCK BELOW THE TOPS OF ROCKS) ARE TIGHTLY ABUTTING EACH OTHER TO FORM A WEIR IN THE STREAM WITH ALL VOID SPACE BETWEEN ROCKS MINIMIZED TO THE GREATEST EXTENT POSSIBLE. PLACEMENT OF THE ROCKS WITH ROCKS ABUTTING AND ALL VOID SPACE MINIMIZED MAY REQUIRE THE CONTRACTOR TO SET THE X-AXIS, Y-AXIS OR Z-AXIS OF ROCK LONGITUDINALLY IN THE CHANNEL. CONTRACTOR MUST COORDINATE WITH COUNTY TO RECEIVE APPROVAL OF ALL FOOTER PLACEMENT PRIOR TO SETTING THE TOP ROCKS. FILTER FABRIC MUST ALSO BE VISIBLE BEFORE CUTTING FLUSH. STRUCTURE ROCKS SHALL BE PLACED SO THAT TOPS OF ROCKS TIGHTLY ABUT EACH OTHER TO FORM A "WEIR' IN THE STREAM. BECAUSE OF ROCK IRREGULARITIES, NOT ALL PORTIONS OF EACH ROCK WILL BE IN DIRECT CONTRACT WITH ADJACENT ROCKS. AREAS GREATER THAN "FIST" SIZE (ANYTHING GREATER THAN APPROXIMATELY (2.5" X 4")) SHALL BE CHINKED WITH SMALLER ROCKS. SAID CHINKING SHALL OCCUR FROM THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE (SO THAT FLOWS WILL NOT DISLODGE CHINKING MATERIAL). CHINKING SHALL BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY FAIRFAX COUNTY DPWES STAFF PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF FABRIC AND BACKFILLING OF THE STRUCTURE. ALTERNATE ANGLES OF PROPOSED SILLS AS DEPICTED IN PLAN VIEW ON SHEET SR-5. SILL SHALL BE BURIED ACROSS STREAM CHANNEL THALWEG AND SHALL CONFORM TO SLOPE UP TO BANKFULL AND ACROSS BENCH PLAN VIEW PROPOSED FINAL GRADE LEFT BANK STAKEOUT POINT RIGHT BANK STAKEOUT POINT I N . 4' 15' BANKFULL ELEV. 5' - 11 III EX. UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE A -A' SECTION VIEW DETAIL: BURIED ROCK SILL NTS (ADAPTED FROM FAIRFAX COUNTY & WEG) .NISI II III- md - HEADER ROCKS FOOTER ROCKS STREAM SUBSTRATE ENHANCEMENT/REIFORCMENT THE STREAM SUBSTRATE ENHANCEMENT (SSM) SPECIFIED BELOW MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PROJECT ENGINEER PRIOR TO BEING PLACED IN THE STREAM CHANNEL. MATERIAL SIZE (D) PORTION PERCENT (%) ROCK2 6.7 in (277 mm) 2 BUCKETS 38% LARGE #3 (ROUND 2-4 in (51 -102 mm) 1 BUCKET 17% COBBLE) BANK RUNS GRAVEL 0.08 - 2.5 in (2 - 64 mm) 1.5 BUCKETS 26% COARSE SAND 0.04 - 0.08 in (1 - 2 mm) 0.75 BUCKET 13% TOPSOILS LOAM OR SILT LOAM WITH 0.5 BUCKET 9% 3 - 5% ORGANIC CONTENT 1. THE REINFORCED BED SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF l.o' IN DEPTH. SEE LONGITUDINAL PROFILE FOR LOCATIONS AND THICKNESS. 2. THE ROCK PORTION OF THE MIXTURE SHALL CONSIST OF CRUSHED STONE (Al RIPRAP). THE VOIDS WILL BE FILLED WITH A MIXTURE OF SAND, GRAVEL AND TOPSOIL. THE ANGULARITY OF THE CRUSHED ROCK, ALONG WITH THE FILLING OF THE VOIDS WILL RESULT IN A VERY RESISTANT, ARMORED SUBSTRATE. RIVER WASHED COBBLE (WHITE, TAN, YELLOW OR BROWN) WITH THE SPECIFIED D50 SHALL BE AN ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATE AS LONG AS IT IS WELL GRADED IN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TO PROVIDE THE ARMOR NEEDED - SUBJECT TO ENGINEERS APPROVAL. 3. BANK RUN GRAVEL MAY INCLUDE UP TO 5% CLAY, SILT, AND/OR SAND, AND UP TO 25% COBBLE (D50 = 3" TO 8"). GRAVEL MUST HAVE NATURAL COLOR (WHITE, TAN, YELLOW OR BROWN). 4. THE SAND PORTION OF THE MIXTURE SHALL CONSIST OF A WELL MIXED SAND PREDOMINANTLY 1.o MILLIMETERS TO 2.0 MILLIMETERS IN SIZE, SUBJECT TO ENGINEER APPROVAL (I.E. WASHED CONCRETE SAND IS NOT REQUIRED). SAND MUST BE WHITE, YELLOW, OR BROWN IN COLOR. 5. THE TOPSOIL PORTION OF THE MIXTURE SHALL CONSIST OF 50% SIFTED, UNWASHED COARSE SAND (WITH FINES ALLOWED), 25% COMPOSTED LEAF/BARK MULCH, 25% MINERAL SILT OR FINER MATERIAL (STONE DUST FROM ROCK CRUSHING OPERATIONS OR ANY SILT/CLAY). 6. LIGHT SSE MIX TO BE PLACED AND TAMPED INTO EXISTING GRADE WITHOUT EXCAVATION. LIGHT SSE SHALL BE TAMPED LIGHTLY INTO EXISTING GRADE WITH MINIMAL DISTURBANCE TO CHANNEL GEOMETRY. DETAIL: STREAM SUBSTRATE ENHANCEMENT RIVANNA VILLAGE: BUFFER MITIGATION PLAN PHASE II ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA BCE Blossom Consulting and Engineering Inc. 1101 Professional Drive, Suite G Williamsburg VA 23185 p: 757-870-4825 ISSUE REV # DATE DESCRIPTION T H op l't SCOTT C. BLOSSOM a Lie. No. 40287 �o l oNAL Job No: 1005 Drawn By: BCE Date: 12.04.2017 Checked By: Scott C. Blossom, P.E. STREAM RESTORATION NOTES AND DETAILS (2) SR-8 NTS (ADAPTED FROM ROSGEN, WILDLAND HYDROLOGY & WEG) FILEPATH:C:\Users\Owner\Dropbox\BCE Network\Projects\005 RivannaNEW\Design and Analysis\CAD\005-BUFFER-MIT-PLAN-SR-20171110.dwgIOwnerlDec 04, 2017 at 10:49ILayoul: 8 Details (2) NTS (ADAPTED FROM WSSI, FAIRFAX COUNTY) r oeeo oe ee 00 eeo•e �1 •• •e •• • S \ •o•e \ \ *Maumee i SCALE: 1 INCH = 20 FEET 0' 20' 40' CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2 FT PROPOSED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN (STREAM RESTORATION) GENERAL NOTES FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL 1. THE PLAN APPROVING AUTHORITY MUST BE NOTIFIED ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE PRE -CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE, ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY, AND ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE FINAL INSPECTION. 2. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES WILL BE CONSTRUCTED AND MAINTAINED ACCORDING TO MINIMUM STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS OF THE VIRGINIA EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL HANDBOOK AND VIRGINIA REGULATIONS VR 625-02-oo EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REGULATIONS. 3. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES ARE TO BE PLACED PRIOR TO OR AS THE FIRST STEP IN CLEARING. 4. A COPY OF THE APPROVED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON THE SITE AT ALL TIMES. 5. PRIOR TO COMMENCING LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES IN AREAS OTHER THAN INDICATED ON THESE PLANS (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, OFF -SITE BORROW OR WASTE AREAS), THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A SUPPLEMENTARY EROSION CONTROL PLAN TO THE OWNER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PLAN APPROVING AUTHORITY. 6. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLATION OF ANY ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES NECESSARY TO PREVENT EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION AS DETERMINED BY THE PLAN APPROVING AUTHORITY. 7. ALL DISTURBED AREAS ARE TO DRAIN TO APPROVED SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES AT ALL TIMES DURING LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES AND DURING SITE DEVELOPMENT UNTIL FINAL STABILIZATION IS ACHIEVED. 8. DURING DEWATERING OPERATIONS, WATER WILL BE PUMPED INTO AN APPROVED FILTERING DEVICE. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES PERIODICALLY AND AFTER EACH RUNOFF PRODUCING RAINFALL EVENT. ANY NECESSARY REPAIRS OR CLEANUP TO MAINTAIN THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY. 1o. ALL FILL MATERIAL TO BE TAKEN FROM AN APPROVED, DESIGNATED BORROW AREA. 11. ALL WASTE MATERIALS SHALL BE TAKEN TO AN APPROVED WASTE AREA. EARTH FILL SHALL BE INERT MATERIALS ONLY, FREE OF ROOTS, STUMPS, WOOD, RUBBISH, AND OTHER DEBRIS. 12. BORROW OR WASTE AREAS ARE TO BE RECLAIMED WITHIN 7 DAYS OF COMPLETION PER ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION 5.1.28. 13. ALL INERT MATERIALS SHALL BE TRANSPORTED IN COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 13-301 OF THE CODE OF ALBEMARLE. 14. BORROW, FILL OR WASTE ACTIVITY INVOLVING INDUSTRIAL -TYPE POWER EQUIPMENT SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE HOURS OF 7:ooAM TO 9:ooPM. 15. BORROW, FILL OR WASTE ACTIVITY SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN A SAFE MANNER THAN MAINTAINS LATERAL SUPPORT, OR ORDER TO MINIMIZE ANY HAZARD TO PERSONS, PHYSICAL DAMAGE TO ADJACENT LAND AND IMPROVEMENTS, AND DAMAGE TO ANY PUBLIC STREET BECAUSE OF SLIDES, SINKING, OR COLLAPSE. 16. THE DEVELOPER SHALL RESERVE THE RIGHT TO INSTALL, MAINTAIN, REMOVE OR CONVERT TO PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES WHERE APPLICABLE ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES REQUIRED BY THIS PLAN REGARDLESS OF THE SALE OF ANY LOT, UNIT, BUILDING OR OTHER PORTION OF THE PROPERTY. 17. TEMPORARY STABILIZATION SHALL BE TEMPORARY SEEDING AND MULCHING. SEEDING IS TO BE AT 75 LBS/ACRE, AND IN THE MONTHS OF SEPTEMBER TO FEBRUARY TO CONSIST A 50/50 MIX OF ANNUAL RYEGRASS AND CEREAL WINTER RYE, OR IN MARCH AND APRIL TO CONSIST OF ANNUAL RYE, OR MAY THROUGH AUGUST TO CONSIST OF GERMAN MILLET. STRAW MULCH IS TO BE APPLIED AT 8oLBS/1ooSF. ALTERNATIVES ARE SUBJECT TO APPROVED BY THE COUNTY EROSION CONTROL INSPECTOR. 18. PERMANENT STABILIZATION SHALL BE LIME AND FERTILIZER, PERMANENT SEEDING, AND MULCH. AGRICULTURAL GRADE LIMESTONE SHALL BE APPLIED AT 9oLBS/1000SF, INCORPORATED INTO THE TOP 4-6 INCHES OF SOIL. FERTILIZER SHALL BE APPLIED AT 1000LBS/ACRE AND CONSIST OF A 10-20-10 NUTRIENT MIX. PERMANENT SEEDING SHALL BE APPLIED AT 18oLBS/ACRE AND CONSIST OF 95% KENTUCKY 31 OR TALL FESCUE AND 0-5 % PERENNIAL RYEGRASS OR KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS. STRAW MULCH IS TO BE APPLIED AT 8oLBS/1ooSF. ALTERNATIVES ARE SUBJECT TO APPROVED BY THE COUNTY EROSION CONTROL INSPECTOR. 19. MAINTENANCE: ALL MEASURES ARE TO BE INSPECTED WEEKLY AND AFTER EACH RAINFALL. ANY DAMAGE OR CLOGGING TO STRUCTURAL MEASURES IS TO BE REPAIRED IMMEDIATELY. SILT TRAPS ARE TO BE CLEANED WHEN 50% OF THE WET STORAGE VOLUME IS FILLED WITH SEDIMENT. ALL SEEDED AREAS ARE TO BE RESEEDED WHEN NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE A GOOD STAND OF GRASS. SILT FENCE AND DIVERSION DIKES WHICH ARE COLLECTING SEDIMENT TO HALF THEIR HEIGHT MUST BE CLEANED AND REPAIRED IMMEDIATELY. 20. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES ARE TO BE REMOVED WITHIN 3o DAYS OF FINAL SITE STABILIZATION, WHEN MEASURES ARE NO LONGER NEEDED, SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CONSTRUCTION NOTES - CONSTRUCTION OF PROPOSED STREAM RESTORATION ACTIVITIES TO BE USED AS BUFFER MITIGATION SHALL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO AND/OR CONCURRENT WITH THE INSTALLATION OF THE PROPOSED ROAD CROSSING (SEE CIVIL SITE DESIGN PLANS) AND ADJACENT EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES (I.E. SEDIMENT BASINS/TRAPS). CONSTRUCTION OF STREAM RESTORATION SHALL BE COMPLETED IN SEGMENTS, LIMITING DISTURBED AREAS TO THOSE WHICH CAN BE STABILIZED AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY TO THE DEGREE PRACTICABLE. UNDER NO CONDITION SHALL THE CHANNEL BE LEFT IN A UN -STABILIZED CONDITION PRIOR TO EXPECTED RAINFALL EVENTS. CONSTRUCTION SEOUENCE 1. INSTALL TEMPORARY STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE (CE). CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE STONE TO BE PLACED ON GEO-TEXTILE FABRIC FOR REMOVAL AFTER CONSTRUCTION. 2. COORDINATE STOCKPILE AND STAGING LOCATIONS WITH THE COUNTY AND PROPERTY OWNER PRIOR TO ANY DISTURBANCE WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA. INSTALL SILT FENCE AS SHOWN ON THIS SHEET. 3. PERFORM NECESSARY CLEARING & GRUBBING OPERATIONS. NOTE - ONLY DISTURB AREAS THAT CAN BE STABILIZED AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY. 4. REMOVE TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING ONLY IF STREAM RESTORATION COMPLETED CONCURRENT WITH BRIDGE CROSSING. 5. INSTALL TEMPORARY STABILIZATION (MATTING) AS NEEDED BETWEEN WORKING TIMES. 6. INSTALL TEMPORARY STREAM CROSS IN REACH 1 TO FACILITATE ACCESS TO RIGHT BANK. 7. INSTALL CHECK DAM (REQUIRED) AND PUMP AROUND* (IF NEEDED) AS SHOWN ON THIS SHEET. 8. GRADE PROPOSED CHANNEL PER PLAN AND PROFILES (IN SEGMENTS, SEE NOTES ABOVE RE DAILY STABILIZATION). 9. INSTALL IN STREAM STRUCTURES AS SHOWN ON PLAN AND PROFILES (SHEET 3 AND 4). 1o. BRING ALL PREVIOUSLY ROUGH GRADED AREAS TO FINISH GRADE. 11. PLACE UNUSED VEGETATION (LOGS, BRANCHES, FELL TREES) ADJACENT TO CHANNEL OR PARALLEL TO FLOW DIRECTION IN ORDER TO PROMOTE HABITAT AND ADDITIONAL FLOW DISSIPATION 12. APPLY SEEDING AS SHOWN ON SEEDING AND PLANTING PLAN (SHEET 11). 13. REMOVE REQUIRED CHECK DAM AND PUMP AROUND* (IF APPLICABLE). 14. STABILIZE ALL OTHER AREAS DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION WITH RIPARIAN STABILIZATION SEED MIX AS SHOWN ON PLANTING PLAN (SHEET 11) . NOTE - INSTALL PROPOSED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES TO COMPLY WITH THE VIRGINIA EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL HANDBOOK, THIRD EDITION 1992. * ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL TAKE PLACE IN "DRY" CONDITIONS IF POSSIBLE. SHOULD CONSTRUCTION TIMING NECESSITATE WORKING IN WET CONDITIONS, A PUMP AROUND SHALL BE EMPLOYED ADDITIONAL NOTES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE MET: - A LAND DISTURBING/GRADING PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED FROM ALBEMARLE COUNTY. - WORK PROPOSED HEREIN SHALL BE COVERED UNDER THE SWPPP FOR PHASE 1 AND PHASE 2 DEVELOPMENT - A PRE -CONSTRUCTION MEETING MUST BE HELD, INCLUDING ALL RELEVANT AGENCY, PROPERTY OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND ENGINEERING PERSONNEL. - PROPOSED SITE PLAN OUTSIDE OF STREAM RESTORATION LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE IS SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY. REFER TO PROPOSED CIVIL SITE DESIGN PLAN AND STORMWATER PLANS (PROVIDED UNDER SEPARATE COVER) FOR DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS. - CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES ARE SHOWN IN ADDITION TO THE MAIN CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AND MAY BE REMOVED UPON APPROVAL OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL INSPECTOR i NOTES FINAL LOCATION OF ALL CONSTRUCTION ACCESS & PROPOSED STAGING & STOCKPILE LOCATIONS TO BE APPROVED AND CONFIRMED WITH ALBEMARLE COUNTY AND PROPERTY OWNER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE. 1. CONTRACTOR TO PERFORM ROUGH GRADING WHERE SHOWN ON THIS SHEET. 2. ALL DENUDED OR DISTURBED AREAS TO BE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED IMMEDIATELY AFTER FINAL GRADE. �................' SHALLOW WHERE THERE IS A BERM AT THE TOP OF THE SLOPE, BRING THE MATERIAL OVER THE BERM AND ANCHOR IT BEHIND THE BERM. ON SHALLOW SLOPES, STRIPS OF NETTING PROTECTIVE COVERINGS MAY BE APPLIED ACROSS THE SLOPE. BERM I I WIT, IT l -If ON STEEP SLOPES, APPLY PROTECTIVE COVERING PARALLEL TO THE DIRECTION OF FLOW AND ANCHOR SECURELY. BRING MATERIAL DOWN TO A LEVEL AREA BEFORE . y - TERMINATING THE INSTALLATION. TURN THE END UNDER 4" AND STAPLE AT 12" INTERVALS. 12" IN DITCHES, APPLY PROTECTIVE COVERING PARALLEL TO THE DIRECTION OF FLOW. USE CHECK SLOTS AS REQUIRED. AVOID JOINING MATERIAL IN THE CENTER OF THE DITCH IF AT ALL POSSIBLE. DFITAIL : E & S CONTROL BLANKET INSTALLATION 3-1/4" I� 2 DIA. 'I WASHER 18" 10" MIN. DIA. STEEL PIN 11 GAUGE STEEL �_ 7 6'x1 "x6" STAPLE STAKE STAPLE PIN 1. 1 /4 TRIANGLE SURVEY STAKE - MINIMUM 10" IN LENGTH. PLACEMENT OF THE STAKE ACROSS THE FLOW OF WATER IS THOUGHT TO PROVIDE A "PINBALL EFFECT" TO HELP SLOW THE VELOCITY. 2. 11 GAUGE STEEL - MINIMUM 1" WIDE BY 6" IN LENGTH STEEL STAPLE - 2"x8" STAPLE MAY BE REQUIRED IN CERTAIN SOIL CONDITIONS. 3.STEEL PINS -16" DIAMETER STEEL PIN BY 1 B" IN LENGTH WITH 2" DIAMETER WASHER ON TOP. (SEE ILLUSTRATION) DETAIL: SOIL MATTING ANCHORS NTS NTS wommmmommol 0 -AMP FIRMLY ANCHOR SLO z LEGEND ,o LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE •••• (FOR STREAM RESTORATION ACTIVITIES ONLY) I EXISTING WETLANDS 1 (PER KIRK HUGHES & ASSOC. SURVEY) EXISTING STREAM CHANNEL LIMITS (PER KIRK HUGHES & ASSOC. SURVEY) EXISTING CONTOURS J(PER KIRK HUGHES & ASSOC. SURVEY) \� PROPOSED TREE PROTECTION 1 A\ (APPROXIMATE) (\ GRADING LIMITS OF RADINGLOG PROPOSED COIR Too MATTING (WITHIN LIMITS OF GRADING) PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE E / TEMPORARY STREAM TSC CROSSING POTENTIAL STAGING AND STOCKPILE AREA P PROPOSED CLASS 1 RIP RAP BANK PROTECTION (SEE BRIDGE DESIGN PLANS) PROPOSED PERMANENT SEEDING (APPLY TO ALL DISTURBED AREAS IN LOD) POTENTIAL ACCESS PATH (TBD BY CONTRACTOR WITHIN LOD) BM ANCHOR SLOT NOTES APPROXIMATELY 200 STAPLES REQUIRED PER 100 SQ. YDS. OF MATERIAL ROLL. ANCHOR SLOTS, JUNCTION SLOTS & CHECK SLOTS TO BE BURIED 6" TO 12". 12" MAX. 4:1 OR FLATTER 6" MAX. STEEPER THAN 4:1 I If - JUNCTION SLOT EDGE AND END JOINTS I TO BE SNUGLY ABUTTED CHECK SLOT i (JUTE MESH WILL HAVE TERMINAL FOLD STAPLED LAP JOINT IN LIEU OF EDGE JOINT) LAP JOINT 2" MIN. (JUTE MESH ONLY) T I I I S MAX. 4:1 OR FLATTER & MAX. STEEPER THAN 4:1 I I I 6' TO 12' TI I I I 111 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I #CHECK SLOT I I I I 1 " TO 2" I I TAMP CHECK SLOT FIRMLY - i�i \/AI;. \/AI1. 1 TC iy 6"TO8"MIN. PLAN VIEW JUNCTION SLOT � rTAMP I FIRMLY 12" -� STAPLING DIAGRAM STAPLE FORMED FROM NO.11 STEEL WIRE. CHECK SLOTS AT MIN. 5O' C-C INTERVALS; 8"STAPLE MIN. LENGTH FOR SANDY SOIL. & STAPLE MIN. LENGTH FOR OTHER SOIL. NOT WITH ALL "COMBINATIONATION"BLANKETS 6" TO 12" DETAI L : E & S CONTROL STAPLING DETAIL TERMINAL FOLD NTS - CONTRACTOR SHALL IDENTIFY SPECIMEN TREES IN THE FIELD AND INSTALL TREE PROTECTION FENCING AROUND PERIMETER OF TREE PER VESCH GUIDELINES STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. SPECIMEN TREES ARE CLASSIFIED AS THOSE WHICH ARE 18 INCHES DIAMETER AT BREAST HEIGHT AND IN GOOD HEALTH, FREE OF SIGNS OF DISEASE. IN LOCATIONS WHERE SPECIMEN TREES ARE PRESENT WITHIN THE LIMITS OF PROPOSED GRADING, MINOR MODIFICATIONS TO PROPOSED CHANNEL GEOMETRY MAY BE FIELD APPROVED BY ENGINEER. IN AREAS WHERE ROOT DISTURBANCE IS GREATER THAN 30%, THE TREE SHALL BE REMOVED. TREE PROTECTION NOTES NTS RIVANNA VILLAGE: BUFFER MITIGATION PLAN PHASE II ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA BCE Blossom Consulting and Engineering Inc. 1101 Professional Drive, Suite G Williamsburg VA 23185 p: 757-870-4825 KEY PLAN ISSUE REV # I DATE DESCRIPTION ��T H op SCOTT C. Lic. No. BLOSSOM a 40287 �SSIDNAL ���� Job No: 1005 Drawn By: BCE Date: 12.04.2017 Checked By: Scott C. Blossom, P.E. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN SR-9 FILEPATH:C:\Users\Owner\Dropbox\BCE Network\Projects\005 RivannaNEW\Design and Analysis\CAD\005.... BUFFER _MIT _ PLAN_ SR_ 20171110.dwglOwnerlDec 04, 2017 at 10:52ILayout: 9 E&S RIVANNA VILLAGE: BUFFER MITIGATION PLAN PROPOSED STREAM RESTORATION PLAN NOTES: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FOLLOWING: 1. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE VIRGINIA EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL HANDBOOK AND THE PROCEDURE OUTLINED ON SHEET 7. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD INSTALL SITE IMPROVEMENTS IN PHASES TO MINIMIZE DISTURBED AREAS. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROPOSE HIS CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE FOR REVIEW BY THE ENGINEER. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL BIO-ENGINEERING AND STRUCTURAL DEVICES FOR STREAM RESTORATION AFTER EARTHWORK OPERATIONS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERMANENTLY STABILIZE THE DISTURBED AREAS WITH THE STREAM RESTORATION MIX IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS SHOWN ON SHEET 8. EROSION CONTROL MATTING AND SEEDING SHALL BE APPLIED IN SENSITIVE AREAS AS IDENTIFIED HEREIN. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF SEEDED AREAS UNTIL A FINAL REVIEW HAS BEEN COMPLETED BY THE ENGINEER. 6. THE ENGINEER SHALL PERFORM A FINAL SITE INSPECTION. ALL COMMENTS RECEIVED BY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF CLEAN-UP ACTIVITIES. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL COMMENCE WITH THE FINAL CLEAN-UP OF THE PROJECT SITE, AND DEMOBILIZATION TASKS. GENERAL NOTES: 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING THE EXACT LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS, AND MUST CONTACT MISS UTILITY PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT AND MAINTAIN A CONSTRUCTION STAGING/ STOCKPILE AREA AS APPROVED BY THE SITE'S ENGINEER. LOCATION OF THIS AREA SHALL BE COORDINATED BETWEEN THE CONTRACTOR AND OWNER (OR REPRESENTATIVE). 3. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LAYOUT AND STAKE -OUT OF ALL WORK COVERED UNDER THESE PLANS. 4. ALL CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROJECT SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED IN SUCH A MANNER THAT CONSTRUCTION AND/OR WASTE MATERIALS DO NOT ENTER STATE WATERS. ACCESS 1. ACCESS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE OWNER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. MAINTENANCE OF THE PROJECT SITE 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL TRASH AND DEBRIS FROM THE SITE ON A DAILY BASIS AND DISPOSE OF OFF -SITE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL LOCAL AND STATE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. 2. ALL EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES SHALL BE STORED WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION STAGING AREA WHILE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES HAVE CEASED FOR THE DAY. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL PROTECTION MEASURES AND DEVICES NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE PROPERTY, ADJACENT PROPERTY, THE PUBLIC, EMPLOYEES, AND THE GENERAL PROJECT DURING THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT AND COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS. 4. ALL EXISTING SITE IMPROVEMENTS TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE. ANY DAMAGE CAUSED BY THE CONTRACTOR DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS UNDER THIS CONTRACT SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT HIS OWN EXPENSE. CLEARING AND GRUBBING 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL TREES, STUMPS, SHRUBS, BRUSH, AND OTHER ORGANIC MATERIAL WITHIN THE GRADING LIMITS NECESSARY TO FACILITATE EARTHWORK ACTIVITIES. 2. ALL WOODY VEGETATION REMOVED FROM THE SITE SUITABLE FOR STRUCTURE USE (LOG SILLS, DEFLECTORS AND ROOT WADS) SHALL BE STOCKPILED ONSITE FOR FUTURE PROJECT USE. ALL ADDITIONAL MATERIAL WILL BE CHIPPED AND STOCKPILED ON -SITE FOR SUBSEQUENT USE BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR ORGANIC MATTER (OR MULCH) WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS. 3. ALL VEGETATION REMOVED WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS THAT CANNOT BE CHIPPED OR USED FOR STRUCTURES SHALL BE HAULED OFF -SITE AND DISPOSED OF BY THE CONTRACTOR 4. ALL TRASH AND OTHER ON -SITE DEBRIS SHALL BE HAULED AND DISPOSED OF OFF -SITE BY THE CONTRACTOR 5. ALL OFF -SITE DISPOSAL METHODS USED BY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL LOCAL AND STATE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. ANY NECESSARY PERMITS SHALL BE OBTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT HIS EXPENSE. EARTHWORKS i. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM ALL ROUGH AND FINE GRADING EARTHWORK OPERATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROPOSED GRADES AND TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS, AS SHOWN HEREIN. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL STRIP, STOCKPILE, AND REPLACE 6 INCHES OF TOPSOIL PRIOR TO ACHIEVING FINAL DESIGN ELEVATION IN SEEDED AREAS NOT STABILIZED BY ROCK. 3. ALL ROUGH AND FINE GRADING OPERATIONS SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED UTILIZING A LASER LEVEL. 4. FINAL GRADES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO FINAL STABILIZATION ACTIVITIES. GEOTECHNICAL SEE GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS BY VIOLA ENGINEERING PROVIDED UNDER SEPARATE COVER FINE GRADING 1. ALL FINE GRADING SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY THE CONTRACTOR UTILIZING A LASER LEVEL. 2. FINAL GRADES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO SEEDING AND STABILIZATION. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT NEWLY GRADED AREAS FROM CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC, EROSION, AND SETTLEMENTS THAT MAY OCCUR. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR AND REESTABLISH ANY DAMAGED AREAS TO FINAL GRADE AREAS AT NO ADDITIONAL EXPENSE TO THE OWNER. 5. THE ENGINEER WILL CONDUCT A SITE INSPECTION AT THE COMPLETION OF FINE GRADING AND NOTIFY THE CONTRACTOR OF ACCEPTANCE PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF SEEDBED PREPARATION AND SEEDING OPERATIONS. SEEDBED PREPARATION 1. IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE FINAL COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE OF FINE GRADING ACTIVITIES, SEEDBED PREPARATION SHALL COMMENCE. 2. FERTILIZER SHALL BE GRANULAR, NON -BURNING PRODUCT GUARANTEED ANALYSIS PROFESSIONAL FERTILIZER WITH AN ANALYSIS OF 10-10-1o. 3. FERTILIZER SHALL BE DELIVERED TO THE SITE IN ORIGINAL UNOPENED CONTAINERS SHOWING WEIGHT, ANALYSIS, AND NAME OF MANUFACTURER. STORE IN A MANNER TO PREVENT WETTING AND/OR DETERIORATION. 4. FERTILIZER SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE OF 15o LBS/ACRES TO THE FINAL SEEDBED. SEEDING 1. SEEDING OPERATIONS SHALL IMMEDIATELY FOLLOW SEEDBED PREPARATION. 2. THE STABILIZATION SEED MIX SHALL BE APPLIED TO ALL DISTURBED AREAS PER THE RATES AND SEED MIX SPECIFICATIONS SHOWN ON SHEET 11. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT PERFORM SEEDING APPLICATION WHEN THE SOIL IS FROZEN. 4. SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE INSPECTED BY THE DESIGNER AT THE COMPLETION OF THE SEEDING OPERATIONS AND ACCEPTED SUBJECT TO COMPLIANCE WITH SPECIFIED MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS. EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS AND MATTING COIR 70oG/M2 MATTING (OR EQUIVALENT) SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND WITH THE VIRGINIA EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL HANDBOOK,1992 EDITION. LIVE STAKES 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE WILLOW (SALIX SP.), AND DOGWOOD (CORNUS SP.) SPECIES AS THE LIVE STAKE SOURCE MATERIAL. 2. THE CUTTINGS FOR LIVE STAKES SHALL BE FRESHLY CUT AND ALIVE, SIDE BRANCHES REMOVED, AND BARK LEFT INTACT. 3. THE LIVE STAKES MUST BE KEPT FRESH AND MOIST AFTER BEING CUT TO THE APPROPRIATE LENGTH. 4. THE LIVE STAKES SHALL BE TAMPED INTO GROUND AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SLOPE AND ANGLED DOWNSTREAM. 5. THE LIVE STAKES SHALL BE PLANTED WITH A RANDOM TRIANGULAR SPACING OF 24. 6. LIVE STAKES THAT BECOME SPLIT, STRIP OR "MUSHROOM" DURING TAMPING SHALL BE REPLACED. PROJECT MAINTENANCE L CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL SEEDED AREAS WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS UNTIL FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROJECT BY THE ENGINEER. 2. FINAL PAYMENT TO THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE AUTHORIZED AFTERA MINIMUM OF 8o% COVERAGE HAS BEEN ACHIEVED. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SUMMARY THE PURPOSE OF THE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS SHALL BE TO PRECLUDE THE TRANSPORT OF ALL WATERBORNE SEDIMENTS RESULTING FROM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES FROM ENTERING ONTO ADJACENT PROPERTIES OR STATE WATERS. IF FIELD INSPECTION REVEALS THE INADEQUACY OF THE PLAN TO CONFINE SEDIMENT TO THE PROJECT SITE, ALL APPROPRIATE MODIFICATIONS WILL BE MADE TO CORRECT ANY PLAN DEFICIENCIES. IN ADDITION TO THESE NOTES, ALL PROVISIONS OF THE VIRGINIA EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REGULATIONS SHALL APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. 1. ALL THE PROVISIONS OF VIRGINIA EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL LAW AND REGULATIONS, MINIMUM STANDARDS, HANDBOOKS, AND TECHNICAL BULLETINS AS PUBLISHED BY THE VIRGINIA SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION BOARD AND/OR THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND RECREATION, DIVISION OF SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION SHALL APPLY TO THE PROJECT. 2. MINIMUM STANDARDS NO.1 THROUGH NO.19 OF THE VIRGINIA EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REGULATIONS (4VAC50-30-40) SHALL APPLY TO THE PROJECT. 3. THE OWNER OR APPLICANT SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO REGISTER FOR COVERAGE UNDER THE GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGE OF STORMWATER FROM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT REQUIREMENTS OF THE VIRGINIA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (VSMP) AND THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND RECREATION. 4. THE OWNER OR APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE THE NAME OF AN INDIVIDUAL HOLDING A VALID RESPONSIBLE LAND DISTURBER (RLD) CERTIFICATE OF COMPETENCE WHO WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITY PRIOR TO ENGAGING IN THE LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITY. THIS WILL BE NECESSARY PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND -DISTURBING PERMIT FOR THE PROJECT. THE RLD IS REQUIRED TO ATTEND THE PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE FOR THE PROJECT. 5. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO CONTACT MISS UTILITY (DIAL 811 IN VA OR 1-800-552-7001) PRIOR TO ANY UTILITY OR SITE WORK EXCAVATIONS. 6. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE PLANNED, DESIGNED, IMPLEMENTED, INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE LATEST EDITION OF THE VIRGINIA EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL HANDBOOK (VESCH). THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN, INSPECT AND REPAIR ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES AS NEEDED THROUGHOUT THE LIFE OF THE PROJECT TO ENSURE CONTINUED ACCEPTABLE PERFORMANCE. 7. A PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE (MEETING) SHALL BE HELD ON SITE BETWEEN THE COUNTY ENGINEERING AND RESOURCE PROTECTION DIVISION, THE OWNER -APPLICANT, THE RESPONSIBLE LAND -DISTURBER (RLD), THE CONTRACTOR AND OTHER RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES, AS APPLICABLE, PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND -DISTURBING PERMIT. THE OWNER OR APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO COORDINATE SCHEDULING OF THE PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE BETWEEN ALL APPLICABLE PARTIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION TO THE COUNTY ENGINEERING AND RESOURCE PROTECTION DIVISION FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING. 8. ALL PERIMETER EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS A FIRST STEP IN ANY LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITY AND SHALL BE MADE FUNCTIONAL BEFORE UPSLOPE LAND DISTURBANCE TAKES PLACE. 9. ADDITIONAL SAFETY FENCE OR DUST CONTROL MEASURES, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF MINIMUM STANDARDS & SPECS. 3.o1 AND 3.39 OF THE VIRGINIA EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL HANDBOOK (VESCH), MAY BE REQUIRED TO BE IMPLEMENTED IN ADDITION TO THAT SHOWN ON THE APPROVED PLAN IN ORDER TO ENSURE ADEQUATE PROTECTION OF THE HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE PUBLIC OR IF SITE CONDITIONS CHANGE, BECOME APPARENT OR ALTER SIGNIFICANTLY FOLLOWING THE DATE OF PLAN APPROVAL. lo. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES MAY REQUIRE MINOR FIELD ADJUSTMENTS AT OR FOLLOWING TIME OF CONSTRUCTION TO ENSURE THEIR INTENDED PURPOSE IS ACCOMPLISHED, TO ENSURE ADEQUATE PROTECTION OF THE HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE OF THE PUBLIC, OR IF SITE CONDITIONS CHANGE, BECOME APPARENT OR ALTER SIGNIFICANTLY FOLLOWING THE DATE OF PLAN APPROVAL. COUNTY ENGINEERING AND RESOURCE PROTECTION DIVISION APPROVAL SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR ANY DEVIATION OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES FROM THE APPROVED PLAN. 11. OFF -SITE WASTE OR BORROW AREAS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE COUNTY ENGINEERING AND RESOURCE PROTECTION DIVISION PRIOR TO THE. IMPORT OF ANY BORROW OR EXPORT OF ANY WASTE TO OR FROM THE PROJECT SITE. 12. CULVERT AND STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTIONS, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF MINIMUM STANDARDS & SPECS. 3.07 AND 3.o8 OF THE VIRGINIA EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL HANDBOOK (VESCH), MAY BE REMOVED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE ASSIGNED COUNTY ENGINEERING AND RESOURCE PROTECTION DIVISION INSPECTOR SHOULD PLACEMENT OF THE MEASURE RESULT IN EXCESSIVE ROAD FLOODING OR TRAFFIC HAZARD OR RESULT IN THE REDIRECTION OF DRAINAGE ONTO OR TOWARD EXISTING LOTS, DRIVEWAYS OR STRUCTURES. DECISIONS SHALL BE MADE ON A CASE -BY -CASE BASIS BASED ON FIELD SITUATIONS ENCOUNTERED. 13. DRAINAGE FACILITIES SHALL BE INSTALLED AND FUNCTIONAL WITHIN 3o DAYS FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF ROUGH GRADING AT ANY POINT WITHIN THE PROJECT. 14. NO MORE THAN 30o FEET OF TRENCH MAY BE OPEN AT ONE TIME FOR UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES, INCLUDING STORM WATER CONVEYANCES. ALL OTHER PROVISIONS OF MINIMUM STANDARD NO.16 OF THE VIRGINIA EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REGULATIONS APPLY. 15. IF DISTURBED AREA STABILIZATION IS TO BE ACCOMPLISHED DURING THE MONTHS OF DECEMBER, JANUARY OR FEBRUARY, STABILIZATION SHALL CONSIST OF MULCHING IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINIMUM STANDARD & SPEC. 3.35 OF THE VIRGINIA EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL HANDBOOK (VESCH). SEEDING WILL THEN TAKE PLACE AS SOON AS THE SEASON PERMITS. 16. THE TERM SEEDING, FINAL VEGETATIVE COVER OR STABILIZATION ON THE APPROVED PLAN SHALL MEAN THE SUCCESSFUL GERMINATION AND ESTABLISHMENT OF A STABLE GRASS COVER FROM A PROPERLY PREPARED SEEDBED, IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINIMUM STANDARDS & SPECS. 3.29 THROUGH 3.37 OF THE VIRGINIA EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL HANDBOOK (VESCH), AS APPLICABLE. IRRIGATION, IF NECESSARY, SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE OUTDOOR WATER USE RESTRICTIONS OF THE JAMES CITY SERVICE AUTHORITY. 17. TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL NOT BE REMOVED UNTIL ALL DISTURBED AREAS ARE STABILIZED. REMOVAL SHALL NOT OCCUR WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION BY THE COUNTY ENGINEERING AND RESOURCE PROTECTION DIVISION. DISTURBANCES ASSOCIATED WITH THE REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE PROPERLY STABILIZED. 18. NO SEDIMENT TRAP OR SEDIMENT BASIN SHALL BE REMOVED UNTIL A) AT LEAST 75 PERCENT OF THE SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS WITHIN THE DRAINAGE AREA TO THE TRAP OR BASIN HAVE BEEN SOLD TO A THIRD PARTY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF HOMES (UNRELATED TO THE DEVELOPER); AND/OR, B) 6o PERCENT OF THE SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS WITHIN THE DRAINAGE AREA TO THE TRAP OR BASIN ARE COMPLETED AND STABILIZED. A BULK SALE OF THE LOTS TO ANOTHER BUILDER DOES NOT SATISFY THIS PROVISION. SEDIMENT TRAPS AND SEDIMENT BASINS SHALL NOT BE REMOVED WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION OF THE COUNTY ENGINEERING AND RESOURCE PROTECTION DIVISION. 19. APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE COUNTY BMP MANUAL (JAMES CITY COUNTY GUIDELINES FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BMPS) AND THE VIRGINIA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT HANDBOOK (VSMH) APPLY TO THE PROJECT. 20. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF PRIVATE -TYPE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, OUTSIDE VDOT RIGHT-OF-WAY, SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT VERSION OF THE JAMES CITY COUNTY ENGINEERING AND RESOURCE PROTECTION DIVISION, STORMWATER DRAINAGE CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS (NON-BMP RELATED), GENERAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES. 21. RECORD DRAWINGS (ASBUILTS) AND CONSTRUCTION CERTIFICATIONS ARE REQUIRED FORALL STORMWATER FACILITIES INCLUDING STORMWATER MANAGEMENT/BMP FACILITIES AND STORM DRAINAGE CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS. RECORD DRAWINGS AND CONSTRUCTION CERTIFICATIONS MUST MEET ESTABLISHED PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS OF BOTH THE COUNTY ENGINEERING AND RESOURCE PROTECTION AND STORMWATER DIVISIONS. RECORD DRAWING(S) AND CONSTRUCTION CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT 22. ALL STORMWATER FACILITIES INCLUDING BMPS, STORM DRAINAGE PIPES, STORMWATER CONVEYANCES, INLETS, MANHOLES, OUTFALLS AND ROADSIDE AND OTHER OPEN CHANNELS SHALL BE INSPECTED BY THE COUNTY STORMWATER DIVISION AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER IN ACCORDANCE WITH ESTABLISHED COUNTY STORMWATER DIVISION PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS. EROSION CONTROL MATTING PRODUCI'NAME WEIGHT THICKNESS TENSILE STRENGTH ELONGATION FLEXIBILITY (MG -CM) FLOW VELOCITY STANDARD SIZE "C" FACTOR OPEN AREA NATURAL FIBER MATTING COIR- oo OREQUIVALENT 70o GR/M 2 0.30 IN. 1348 X 626 LB/FT 34% X 38% 6503o X 29590 11 FT/SEC 6.6. X 164 FT 1 0.002 50 % (OBSERVED) (120 SQ.YDS/ROLL) EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONSTRUCTION NOTES DUE TO THE NATURE AND SHORT CONSTRUCTION PERIOD OF THIS PROJECT, EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SHALL BE HANDLED IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER. ALL DETAILS AND EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL FOLLOW THE VIRGINIA EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL HANDBOOK (VESCH, 1992) MINIMUM STANDARDS. ADDITIONALLY, ALBEMARLE COUNTY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES AND DETAILS, ALSO APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. 1. THE SITE SHALL BE ACCESSED AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN SHEET. ACCESS LOCATIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED AND APPROVED BY ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (VDOT) AND IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO MANAGE. 2. CLEARING OF EXISTING TREES SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE MINIMUM EXTENT NEEDED TO PERFORM THE PROPOSED WORK. 3. ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WILL TAKE PLACE FROM UPSTREAM TO DOWNSTREAM, LIMITING DISTURBED AREAS TO THOSE WHICH CAN BE STABILIZED THE SAME WORKING DAY. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL STABILIZE ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITH EROSION CONTROL MATTING, AS SPECIFIED ON THE REPRESENTATIVE CROSS -SECTIONS, PRIOR TO THE COMPLETION OF EACH WORK DAY. NO BARE SOIL SHALL BE LEFT EXPOSED AFTER THE CONTRACTOR HAS LEFT THE SITE. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RE-EXAMINE THAT ALL WORK HAS BEEN SEEDED AND STABILIZED PROPERLY. 6. ALBEMARLE COUNTY INSPECTOR HAS THE AUTHORITY TO ADD OR DELETE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS AS NEEDED IN THE FIELD AS CONDITIONS WARRANT. NOTE.- ALL ELEVATIONS SHALL BE CHECKED BY THE DESIGNER/ENGINEER AT THE COMPLETION OF EACH WORK ZONE, OR AS NEEDED DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. EXISTING PAVEMENT_ 70' MIN. 6" MIN.; A, 15:1- -_ FILTER CLOTH' A MOUNTABLE EXISTING GROUND SIDE ELEVATION BERM (OPTIONAL) r 12' MIN. VDOT #1 COURSE AGGREGATE FILTER CLOTH REINFORCED CONCRETE • .1 • :�,�'1 �•�}1 i�1'' • 'ill IIIIIIIII •.'••�,•• 3" MIN. 3" MIN. SECTION A -A 6'-71I DRAIN SECTION B-B SPACE SOURCE: ADAPTED FROM 1983 MARYLAND STANDARDS FOR SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL, AND Va. DSWC. DETAIL - TEMPORARY STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE NTS VESCH STD & SPEC 3.02 PHASE II ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA BCE Blossom Consulting and Engineering Inc. 1101 Professional Drive, Suite G Williamsburg VA 23185 p: 757-870-4825 KEY PLAN ISSUE REV # DATE DESCRIPTION #2 4/16/18 1 2ND ROUND CO. COMMENTS tjT H OF ��� Q) Gl 12*1 SCOTT C. BLOSSOM a Lie. No. 40287 �w� �SSIONAL Job No: 1005 Drawn By: BCE Date: 12.04.2017 Checked By: Scott C. Blossom, P.E. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES FILEPATH:C:\Users\owner\Dropbox\BCE Network\Projects\005 RivannaNE\N\Design and Analysis\CAD\005_ BUFFER _MIT _PLAN _ SR_ 20171110_REV2.dwglOwnerlApr 12, 2018 at 15:381Layout: 10 E&S (2) SR- 10 0 0♦i 1 ♦ ♦♦ ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN PROPOSED LIMITS OF GRADING I j SHALL BE SEED AND MATTED WITH COIR 700. APPLY 6 INCHES \ OF TOPSOIL ON ALL AREAS TO BE SEEDED AND MATTED. PROPOSED RIPARIAN BUFFER PLANTING \ S \ \ " •♦♦ ASSOCIATED WITH STREAM RESTORATION \ •♦♦ ACTIVITIES. DISTRIBUTE PROPOSED NATIVE S__ •♦♦♦ PLANTINGS BETWEEN PRESERVED SPECIMEN �♦ ♦ Q TREES TO THE DEGREE PRACTICABLE PER •♦♦♦ \ PLANTING PALETTE THIS SHEET + S \ 4 ♦♦ S N SCALE: i INCH - 20 FEET 0' 20 40 8o' x CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2 FT SHRUB AND TREE INSTALLATION: 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LAYOUT OF ALL WORK COVERED UNDER THESE PLANS. 2. ALL PLANT MATERIAL, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, SHALL BE UNIFORMLY BRANCHED AND HAVE A VIGOROUS ROOT SYSTEM. PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE HEALTHY, VIGOROUS, AND FREE FROM DEFECTS, DECAY, DISEASES, INSECT PEST EGGS, AND ALL FORMS OF INFESTATION. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE FRESH AND FREE FROM TRANSPLANT SHOCK OR VISIBLE WILT. PLANTS DEEMED UNHEALTHY WILL BE REJECTED. 3. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL MEET THE MINIMUM SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS DESCRIBED IN THE CURRENT ISSUE OF "THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK", PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN, 1250 I STREET, N.W., SUITE 500, WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005. 4. ALL CONTAINER STOCK SHALL HAVE BEEN PROPAGATED IN A CONTAINER LONG ENOUGH FOR THE ROOT SYSTEM TO HAVE DEVELOPED SUFFICIENTLY TO HOLD ITS SOIL. CONTAINER STOCK WITH POORLY DEVELOPED ROOT SYSTEMS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. 5. PLANTS WILL BE PREPARED FOR SHIPMENT IN A MANNER THAT WILL NOT CAUSE DAMAGE TO THE BARK, BUDS, BRANCHES, STEMS, OR OVERALL SHAPE OF THE STOCK. CONTAINER GROWN PLANTS WILL BE TRANSPORTED IN THE CONTAINERS IN WHICH THEY HAVE BEEN GROWN. 6. PLANTS NOT INSTALLED ON THE DAY OF ARRIVAL ONSITE SHALL BE STORED AND PROTECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR. OUTSIDE STORAGE AREAS WILL BE SHADED AND PROTECTED FROM THE WIND AND SUN. PLANTS STORED ONSITE SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM ANY DRYING AT ALL TIMES BY COVERING THE BALLS OR ROOTS WITH MOIST SAWDUST, WET BURLAP, WOOD CHIPS, SHREDDED BARK, PEAT MOSS, OR OTHER SIMILAR MULCHING MATERIAL. 7. NO SUBSTITUTIONS IN SIZE OR VARIETY OF PLANT MATERIAL SHALL OCCUR WITHOUT THE PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS IN THE FIELD AND NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY VARIANCE FROM PLAN. 9. PLANTING OF WOODY PLANTS SHALL OCCUR WHEN VEGETATION IS NORMALLY DORMANT UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 1o. NO PLANTING SHALL OCCUR WHEN THE SOIL IS FROZEN. PLANTING SEQUENCING 1. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LAYOUT OF ALL PLANT MATERIAL. 2. HOLES FOR INDIVIDUAL PLANTINGS SHALL BE EXCAVATED AS SHOWN IN THE DETAILS ON THIS SHEET. ALL PLANTING HOLES SHALL HAVE ROUGHED, SCARIFIED SIDES AND BOTTOMS. 3. CONTAINERIZED PLANTS SHALL BE SET IN THE PLANTING PIT AT THE PROPER DEPTH, ON TAMPED SOIL. SOIL REMOVED FROM THE PLANTING PIT AND SHALL THEN BE FILLED AROUND THE ROOTS AND TAMPED. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE DISTURBED AREAS TO INDICATED FINAL GRADES IF DISTURBED BY THE INSTALLATION OF SHRUBS AND TREES. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL WATER EACH WOODY PLANT WITH THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM QUANTITIES OF WATER, UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER: SP4-#2 CONTAINERS: 1 GALLON #3-#5 CONTAINERS: 2 GALLONS #7 CONTAINER OR LARGER: 3 GALLONS 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY 2-3 INCHES OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH IN AREAS WHERE HERBACEOUS AND WOODY CONTAINER PLANTS WILL BE INSTALLED. MULCH SHALL NOT BE APPLIED IN ANY SEEDED AREAS. PROJECT MAINTENANCE AND WARRANTY: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN INSTALLED PLANT MATERIAL WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS UNTIL FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROJECT BY THE ENGINEER. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR HERBIVORY CONTROL MEASURES DEEMED NECESSARY TO PROTECT PLANTS DURING WARRANTY PERIOD. 3. FINAL PAYMENT TO THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE AUTHORIZED ONCE ALL SPECIFIED PLANT MATERIAL IS DETERMINED TO BE HEALTHY AND INSTALLED AS PER SPECIFICATIONS. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A ONE-YEAR t00% REPLACEMENT WARRANTY ON ALL WOODY PLANT MATERIAL, AND 8o% COVERAGE OF ALL AREAS SEEDED OR PLANTED WITH HERBACEOUS PLANT MATERIAL AFTER THE FIRST COMPLETE GROWING SEASON. REPLACEMENT RATES TO BE DETERMINED BY AVERAGING MORTALITY RATES FOUND IN RANDOM SAMPLE PLOTS. THE OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO DETERMINE DIFFERENT MORTALITY RATES IN SPECIFIED AREAS WITHIN THE SITE. V NO PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLANTING WITHIN SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT EASEMENT AREA SHALL RECEIVE STABILIZATION SEED MIX ONLY. x x APPLY STABILIZATION SEED MIX TO ALL / DISTURBED AREAS OUTSIDE OF LIMITS OF / GRADING AND OUTSIDE OF PROPOSED RIPARIAN CORRIDOR BUFFER PLANTINGS x I o 113 i"� "kit WIA �uo k / GJ Q / k / PROPOSED RIPARIAN BUFFER PLANTING ` k ASSOCIATED WITH STREAM RESTORATION / \ ACTIVITIES. DISTRIBUTE PROPOSED NATIVE / PLANTINGS BETWEEN PRESERVED SPECIMEN TREES TO THE DEGREE PRACTICABLE PER / ♦ ♦♦ PLANTING PALETTE THIS SHEET ZMM f ♦ I t \ ♦ __ LEGEND LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE •�♦�� (FOR STREAM RESTORATION ACTIVITIES ONLY C EXISTING WETLANDS (PER KIRK HUGHES & ASSOC. SURVEY) EXISTING STREAM CHANNEL LIMITS (PER KIRK HUGHES & ASSOC. SURVEY) PROPOSED LIVE STAKES PROPOSED RIPARIAN CORRIDOR BUFFER PLANTINGS APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF GRADING ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN PROPOSED LIMITS OF GRADING '♦♦ i SHALL BE SEED AND MATTED WITH COIR 700. APPLY 6 INCHES r. ♦♦ �.... ♦ OF TOPSOIL ON ALL AREAS TO BE SEEDED AND MATTED. \ ♦♦♦ \ v \ ♦ •. \ - / :� \ \ ♦ .,� • •• J3 ., •♦�♦ '� / / ♦� \ \ \ \ \ ♦ . ♦\ / / \ • \ \ ............ ♦ c • • ♦♦\ \ ♦ \i NODE S3h STABILIZATION SEED MIX (0.25 AC.) LEGEND MIX % BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SPECIFICATION INDICATOR (EMP) NOTES 90 FESTUCA ARUNDINACEA TALL FESCUE FACU APPLY SEED AT RATE OF 200 LBS./AC. SEED APPLY HYDROMULCH AT 1200 LBS./AC. OR STRAW 10 POA PRATENSE KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS FACU MULCH AT 2 TONS/AC. INCORPORATE SEASONAL NURSE CROP IN ACCORDANCE WITH DATES SHOWN. * STABILIZATION SEED MIX SHALL BE APPLIED TO ALL DISTURBED AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE LIMITS OF GRADING AND THE LIMITS OF THE PROPOSED RIPARIAN BUFFER CORRIDOR PLANTINGS. * APPLY 6 INCHES OF TOPSOIL IN ALL AREAS TO BE SEEDED. * APPLY SURFACE PROTECTION (I.E. STRAW) PER VESCH AND ALBEMARLE COUNTY GUIDELINES IN ALL DISTURBED AREAS LIVE STAKES LEGEND # BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SPECIFICATION INDICATOR (EMP) NOTES PLANT STAKES AT 5 FT CENTERS, ONE ROW ON 75 Cornus amomum DOGWOOD FAC EACH SIDE OF BANK, APPROXIMATELY 3-5 FEET MIN 3 FT LENGTH FROM CENTER LINE ON BANKFULL BENCH. 75 Salix nigra BLACK WILLOW FAC \ \ RANDOMLY ALTERNATE SPECIES. DRIVE STAKE THROUGH MATTING OR CUT HOLES AS NEEDED. GENERAL PLANTING NOTES 1. ALL SEED MIXES ARE TO BE UNTREATED TESTED SEED OF GOOD QUALITY AND FREE OF NOXIOUS WEEDS. 2. ALL SEED SHALL BE DRY AND NOT MOLDY AND SHALL SHOW NO SIGN OF HAVING BEEN WET OR OTHERWISE DAMAGED. 3. EACH BAG OF SEED SHALL BE LABELED WITH THE NAME OF THE SEED MIX, PERCENTAGES OF EACH SPECIES IN THE MIX, AND THE SUPPLIER'S NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER- 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE THE SEED MIXES AND APPLICATION RATES AS SHOWN ON THE PLANT SCHEDULES. NO SUBSTITUTIONS SHALL BE ACCEPTED WITHOUT PRIOR PERMISSION FROM THE ENGINEER OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT SEEDED AREAS PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE. 6. SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE INSPECTED BY THE ENGINEER OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AT THE COMPLETION OF THE SEEDING OPERATIONS AND ACCEPTED SUBJECT TO COMPLIANCE WITH SPECIFIED MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS. �7. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING ACTUAL AMOUNT OF STABILIZATION SEED MIXES REQUIRED. 8. TREE PROTECTION AREAS SHOWN ON E&S PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD LOCATE SPECIMEN TREES, AND PROTECT WITH TREE PROTECTION FENCING PRIOR 770 DISTURBANCE FOR STREAM RESTORATION ACTIVITIES, CONTRACTOR SHALL SELECT PLANTING AREAS BASED ON EXISTING TREE CANOPY, AND DISTRIBUTE PLANTS AS NEED TO ATTAIN ADEQUATE COVERAGE OF THE PLANTING AREAS. 9. SEE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN (PROVIDED UNDER SEPARATE COVER) FOR LANDSCAPE PLANTING OUTSIDE OF THE STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT LIMITS. 1o. PROPOSED SITE PLAN SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY. SEE CIVIL SITE PLANS FOR SITE PLAN SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS. NOTES: 1. PLANTING HOLE SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT SIZE AS NOT TO CRAMP THE ROOTS. 2. PLANTING HOLE SHALL BE TAMPED WITH FOOT TO SECURE PLANT MATERIAL IN SOIL. 3"-4" SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH; PULL AWAY FROM BASE OF PLANT (WHERE REQUIRED) a RIPARIAN CORRIDOR PLANT PALLETTE (0.25 ACRES) LEGEND QUANTITY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SPECIFICATION INDICATOR (EMP) NOTES BIN 5 BETULA NIGRA RIVER BIRCH #7 CONTAINER FACW CA 3 CORNUS AMOMUM SILKY DOGWOOD #2 CONTAINER FACW LB 9 LINDERA BENZOIN NORTHERN SPICEBUSH #2 CONTAINER FAC PO 5 PLATANUS OCCIDENTALIS SYCAMORE #7 CONTAINER FACW QM 6 QUERCUS MICHAUXII SWAMP CHESTNUT OAK #7 CONTAINER FACW VD 5 VIBURNUM DENTATUM ARROWWOOD VIBURNUM #2 CONTAINER FAC RIPARIAN CORRIDOR PLANT NATIVE SEED MIX (0.25 ACRES) LEGEND PERCENT BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SPECIFICATION INDICATOR (EMP) NOTES CC 10 CONOCLINIUM COELESTINUM BLUE MIST FLOWER SEED FAC EV 20 ELYMUS VIRGINICUS VIRGINIA WILD RYE SEED FACW EP 10 EUPATORIUM PERFOLIATUM BONESEr SEED FACW PV 30 PANICUM VIRGATUM SWITCH GRASS SEED FAC VN 15 VERNONIA NOVEBORACENSIS NEW YORK IRONWEED SEED FACW AV 15 ANDROPOGON VIRGINICUS BROOMSEDGE BLUESTEM SEED FACU NOTES: APPLY WITHIN LIMITS OF GRADING, AFTER COVERING WITH 6 INCHES TOPSOIL. SECURE WITH MATTING AFTER SEEDING. DETAIL: #7 CONTAINER INSTALLATION 1---2" X 2" HARDWOOD STAKE GALVANIZED WIRE GUY RUBBER HOSE REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 OF BALL NTS NOTES: 1. PLANTING HOLE SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT SIZE AS NOT TO CRAMP THE ROOTS. 2. PLANTING HOLE SHALL BE TAMPED WITH FOOT TO SECURE CONTAINER PLANT MATERIAL IN SOIL. PLACE TOP OF ROOT BALL AT GRADE 3"A" SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH; PULL AWAY FROM BASE OF PLANT (WHERE REQUIRED) LOOSEN ROOT BALL (BUTTERFLY) BEFORE PLANTING IN PLANTING PIT BACKFILL WITH MATERIAL REMOVED DURING PLANTING PIT y / EXCAVATION AND TAMP TO PREVENT SETTLEMENT SIDES AND BOTTOMS OF PLANTING PIT SHOULD BE ROUGHED AND SCARIFIED DETAIL: #2 CONTAINER INSTALLATION NTS RIVANNA VILLAGE: BUFFER MITIGATION PLAN PHASE II ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA SCE Blossom Consulting and Engineering Inc. 1101 Professional Drive, Suite G Williamsburg VA 23185 p: 757-870-4825 ►14W1dZIW.101I ISSUE REV # I DATE DESCRIPTION Op yr� SCOTT C. BLOSSOM Lie. No. 40287 �O1111� �ISISIONAL Job No: 1005 Drawn By: BCE Date: 12.04.2017 Checked By: Scott C. Blossom, P.E. STREAM RESTORATION PLANTING PLAN SR - 11 FILEPATH:C:\Users\Owner\Dropbox\BCE Network\Projects\005 RivannaNEW\Design and Analysis\CAD\005....BUFFER _ MIT_ PLAN_SIR _20171110.dwg OwnerlDec 04, 2017 at 10 571Layout 11 Planting HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS RESULTS (PREPARED IN PONDPACK WITH TR-55 METHODOLOGY) IMPERVIOUS (ACRE) TURF/MEADOW (ACRE) FOREST (ACRE) TOTAL AREA (ACRE) CN Tc (HR) RV1 (AC -FT) Q1 (CFS) RV2 (AC -FT) 02 (CFS) RV5 (AC -FT) 05 (CFS) RV10 (AC -FT) Q10 (CFS) RV25 (AC -FT) 025 (CFS) RV50 (AC -FT) Q50 (CFS) RV100 (AC -FT) 0100 (CFS) DA AS3a-1 ,2,3,4 2.672 2.578 0.910 6.160 84 0.083 0.735 13.29 0.997 18.10 1.440 26.14 1.823 32.97 2.408 43.19 2.919 51.99 3.486 61.60 DA AS3b 0.138 0.531 0.000 0.669 79 0.083 0.062 1.12 0.088 1.59 0.132 2.39 0.171 3.11 0.231 4.20 0.285 5.15 0.345 6.20 DA AS3c-1,2 0.294 0.706 0.220 1.220 79 0.386 0.113 1.29 0.159 1.84 0.239 2.81 0.311 3.66 0.420 4.95 0.518 6.07 0.626 7.30 DA AS3d-1,2,3 0.537 0.913 0.709 2.159 79 0.211 0.200 3.01 0.282 4.26 0.425 6.46 0.551 8.39 0.746 11.31 0.918 13.85 1 .1 11 16.64 DA BS3a 0.775 0.739 0.086 1.600 85 0.155 0.200 3.32 0.269 4.44 0.386 6.28 0.487 7.85 0.639 10.22 0.773 12.26 0.921 14.48 DA BS3b-1,2 0.923 0.827 0.209 1.959 85 0.111 0.245 4.38 0.330 5.88 0.473 8.33 0.596 10.40 0.783 13.49 0.947 16.14 1.128 19.03 DA CS3-1,2 4.962 5.088 0.000 10.050 86 0.083 1.319 23.93 1.763 32.03 2.505 45.31 3.144 56.52 4.112 73.20 4.957 87.51 5.891 103.11 DA ES3-1,2 0.578 1.342 0,000 1.920 81 0.083 0.198 3.58 0.274 4.96 0.406 7.37 0.521 9.47 0.698 12.63 0.855 15.37 1.028 18.38 DA HS3a-1,2 1.250 1.589 0.000 2.839 85 0.083 0.356 6.43 0.479 8.69 0.685 12.42 0.864 15.58 1.136 20.30 1.373 24.35 1.636 28.77 DA HS3b 0.000 1.180 0.000 1.180 74 0.146 0.083 1.35 0.122 2.04 0.193 3.23 0.256 4.30 0.357 5.93 0.447 7.43 0.548 9.09 DA S3a 1.304 1.811 2.370 5.485 80 0.083 0.536 9.70 0.751 13.58 1.120 20.31 1.445 26.26 1.946 35.26 2.389 43.08 2.882 51.67 DA S3b 0.324 0.671 1.756 2,751 75 0.083 0.205 3.63 0.300 5.40 0.468 8.46 0.619 11.18 0.856 15.55 1.068 19.40 1.306 23.67 DA S3c 0.898 1.611 4.379 6.888 76 0.083 0.543 9.69 0.787 14.21 1.216 22.00 1.601 28.99 2.203 40.02 2.739 49.71 3.341 60.43 DA S3d 0.226 1 361 4.268 5.855 73 0.335 0.386 4.53 0.576 7.08 0.917 11.60 1.227 15.65 1.716 21.96 2.157 27.55 2.654 33.76 DA S3e 1.051 3.168 1.116 5.335 81 0.092 0.549 9.94 0.762 13.81 1.128 20.29 1.448 25.84 1.940 34.18 2.375 41.39 2.857 49.48 DA S3f 1.336 0.817 1.506 3.659 82 0.083 0.396 7.17 0.545 9.85 0.800 14.54 1.023 18.56 1.364 24.61 1.664 29.84 1.997 35.56 DA S3g 0.442 0.914 1.130 2.486 78 0.083 0.219 3.94 0.311 5.64 0.473 8.54 0.616 11.18 0.838 15.22 1.036 18.75 1.256 22.63 DA S3h 0.185 2.635 3.523 6.343 75 0.310 0.122 2.00 0.182 3.05 0.290 4.91 0.388 6.64 0.543 9.33 0.683 11.72 0.840 14.37 DA S3i 0.000 0.577 1.271 1.848 73 0.134 1.321 14.77 1.969 23.21 3.136 38.24 4.197 51.75 5.873 72.80 7.381 91.48 9.083 112.27 DA S3j 1.310 2.038 16.704 20.052 73 0.357 0.471 5.89 0.688 8.85 1.074 14.03 1.422 18.62 1.968 25.71 2.455 32.07 3.004 39.13 NODE S3a 2.227 2.638 2.579 7.444 - - 0.633 9.70 0.922 14.31 1.425 24.89 1.867 33.32 2.600 43.51 3.212 52.18 3.892 60.76 NODE S3b 3.326 4.048 4.421 11.795 - - 0.912 13.36 1.355 19.82 2.129 36.59 2.814 50.03 3.923 66.46 4.870 79.09 5.924 93.22 NODE S3c 4.802 7.001 8.800 20.603 - - 1.479 23.05 2.228 34.03 3.548 59.07 4.725 82.26 6.604 113.50 8.236 139.41 10.058 166.26 NODE S3d 9.990 13.450 13.068 36.508 - - 2.467 25.70 3.538 38.53 5.377 68.37 6.986 93.19 10.127 129.25 12.994 159.45 16.208 191.10 NODE S3e 1.588 4.081 1.825 7.494 - - 0.652 9.94 0.940 14.30 1.444 22.42 1.886 30.17 2.566 40.77 3.167 50.46 3.837 60.97 NODE S3f 6.028 8.713 4.461 19.202 - - 1.483 20.91 2.245 33.62 3.553 56.66 4.697 75.34 6.454 97.37 8.002 117.94 9.724 144.53 NODE S3g 7.720 11.216 5.591 24.527 - - 1.911 28.43 2.878 45.36 4.547 74.54 6.005 99.41 8.246 130.03 10.221 157.72 12.524 190.77 NODE S3h 7.905 15.031 9.114 32.050 - - 2.426 33.21 3.650 52.83 5.774 87.25 7.644 114.36 10.530 152.73 13.082 189.39 16.034 228.30 NODE S3i 7.905 15.608 10.385 33.898 - - 2.548 35.21 3.832 55.87 6.065 92.14 8.033 120.88 11.073 161.78 13.765 200.66 16.874 242.04 NODE S3j 1.310 2.038 16.704 20.052 - - 1.321 14.77 1.969 23.21 3.136 38.24 4.197 51.75 5.873 72.80 7.381 91.48 9.083 112.27 * NODE S39 UTILIZED FOR HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS IN ASSOCIATION WITH PROPOSED STREAM RESTORATION ACTIVITIES. SEE STORMWATER DESIGN PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS. r 7 3t i` I RIVANNA VILLAGE: BUFFER r-l"o MITIGATION PLAN . � ems-%�.►; J -� ,j I \35225 HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS SUMMARY (PREPARED IN USACE HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING CENTER'S RIVER ANALYSIS SYSTEM (HEC RAS)) PRE -RESTORATION HYDRAULIC SUMMARY POST -RESTORATION HYDRAULIC SUMMARY Reach River Sta Profile QTotal Min Ch El W.S. Elev Crit W.S. E.G. Elev Vel Chnl Flow Area Top Width Froude #Chl (cfs) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/s) (sq ft) (ft) SR Reach 125 1 YR 29 360 360.4 360.4 360.58 3.52 9.27 28.06 0.98 SR Reach 125 2 YR 46 360 360.54 360.54 360.76 4.02 13.27 31.43 0.97 SR Reach 125 10 YR 100 360 360.85 360.85 361.18 5.06 24.41 39.3 0.97 SR Reach 125 100YR 191 360 361.23 361.23 361.68 6.09 41.04 48.75 0.97 SR Reach 40 1 YR 29 358 359.04 359.08 2.09 20.72 32.94 0.36 SR Reach 40 2 YR 46 358 359.26 359.31 2.5 28.49 38.38 0.39 SR Reach 40 10 YR 100 358 359.72 359.81 3.32 48.95 49.96 0.45 SR Reach 40 100YR 191 358 360.22 360.36 4.2 77.21 63.26 0.5 SR Reach -5 1 YR 29 358 358.62 358.62 358.83 4.37 9.07 22.42 0.98 SR Reach -5 2 YR 46 358 358.79 358.79 359.05 4.93 13.31 26.73 0.98 SR Reach -5 10 YR 100 358 359.16 359.16 359.52 6.1 25.01 36.05 1 SR Reach -5 100YR 191 358 359.58 359.58 360.04 7.28 42.12 46.42 1.02 SR Reach -42 1 YR 29 354 354.91 355.13 4.6 9.15 16.22 0.85 SR Reach -42 2 YR 46 354 355.09 355.06 355.4 5.56 12.42 18.75 0.94 SR Reach -42 10 YR 100 354 355.54 355.54 356 7.16 22.24 24.83 1.02 SR Reach -42 100YR 191 354 356.5 356.79 6.19 51.66 35.51 0.69 SR Reach -81 1 YR 29 353 354.31 354.31 354.57 4.39 8.28 17.95 0.86 SR Reach -81 2 YR 46 353 354.51 354.51 354.83 4.97 12.31 21.24 0.87 SR Reach -81 10 YR 100 353 355.45 355.6 3.89 38.89 34.86 0.49 SR Reach -81 100YR 191 353 356.51 356.62 3.63 82.08 45.04 0.37 SR Reach -135 1 YR 29 352 353.45 353.69 4.2 8.43 7.63 0.62 SR Reach -135 2 YR 46 352 353.75 354.13 5.36 10.82 8.37 0.71 SR Reach -135 10 YR 100 352 354.34 354.34 355.2 8.3 16.38 11.18 0.96 SR Reach -135 100YR 191 352 355.4 355.4 356.35 9.29 31.99 18.11 0.89 SR Reach -190 1 YR 29 352 352.78 352.78 353.14 4.95 6.37 9.34 0.99 SR Reach -190 2 YR 46 352 353.05 353.05 353.52 5.72 8.98 10.14 0.98 SR Reach -190 10 YR 100 352 353.71 353.71 354.43 7.22 16.32 12.12 0.97 SR Reach -190 100YR 191 352 354.63 354.63 355.51 8.27 30.62 20.84 0.9 SR Reach -225 1 YR 29 350 351.57 351.57 352.04 5.49 5.28 5.72 1.01 SR Reach -225 2 YR 46 350 351.95 351.95 352.51 6.02 7.65 6.85 1 SR Reach -225 10 YR 100 350 352.73 352.73 353.6 7.54 13.75 8.82 0.97 SR Reach -225 100YR 191 350 353.74 353.74 354.91 8.9 24.02 11.36 0.92 SR Reach -260 Culvert SR Reach -295 1 YR 29 350 350.73 350.73 351.03 4.41 6.57 11.01 1.01 SR Reach -295 2 YR 46 350 350.96 350.96 351.34 4.96 9.28 12.29 1.01 SR Reach -295 10 YR 100 350 351.5 351.5 352.06 5.98 16.72 15.26 1.01 SR Reach -295 100YR 191 350 352.16 352.16 352.88 6.82 28.57 22.72 0.97 SR Reach -350 1 YR 29 348 349.39 349.5 3.24 12.74 14.39 0.48 SR Reach -350 2 YR 46 348 349.67 349.84 3.93 17.22 16.56 0.54 SR Reach -350 10 YR 100 348 350.27 350.55 5.47 28.49 21.95 0.64 SR Reach -350 100YR 191 348 350.95 351.36 6.78 46.03 29.46 0.7 SR Reach -418 1 YR 29 348 348.72 348.72 349 4.63 7.6 14.18 0.96 SR Reach -418 2 YR 46 348 348.94 348.94 349.29 5.31 10.93 16.36 0.97 SR Reach -418 10 YR 100 348 349.44 349.44 349.95 6.61 20.53 21.44 0.97 SR Reach -418 100YR 191 348 349.97 349.97 350.7 8.28 33.06 26.65 1.04 SR Reach -465 1 YR 29 347 348.11 348.11 348.25 3.19 12.43 53.61 0.72 SR Reach -465 2 YR 46 347 348.22 348.22 348.39 3.65 18.52 56.16 0.76 SR Reach -465 10 YR 100 347 348.46 348.46 348.69 4.69 32.17 61.49 0.85 SR Reach -465 100YR 191 347 348.71 348.71 349.05 5.9 48.75 67.41 0.94 SR Reach -611 1 YR 29 346 346.17 346.12 346.2 1.53 19.13 116.98 0.66 SR Reach -611 2 YR 46 346 346.22 346.17 346.27 1.81 25.68 117.99 0.68 SR Reach -611 10 YR 100 346 346.36 346.45 2.39 42.45 120.52 0.7 SR Reach -611 100YR 191 346 346.55 346.69 2.99 65.21 123.87 0.71 SR Reach -770 1 YR 29 344 344.27 344.2 344.32 1.79 16.81 65.82 0.6 SR Reach -770 2 YR 46 344 344.36 344.27 344.43 2.14 22.52 68.56 0.63 SR Reach -770 10 YR 100 344 344.56 344.44 344.69 2.89 37.17 75.12 0.68 SR Reach -770 100YR 191 344 344.81 344.67 345.01 3.7 57.05 83.21 0.72 Reach RiverSta Profile QTotal Min Ch EI W.S. Elev Crit W.S. E.G. Elev Vel Chnl Flow Area Top Width Froude #Chl (cfs) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/s) (sq ft) (ft) SR Reach 125 1 YR 29 360 360.4 360.4 360.58 3.52 9.27 28.06 0.98 SR Reach 125 2 YR 46 360 360.54 360.54 360.76 4.02 13.27 31.43 0.97 SR Reach 125 10 YR 100 360 360.85 360.85 361.18 5.06 24.41 39.3 0.97 SR Reach 125 100 YR 191 360 361.23 361.23 361.68 6.09 41.04 48.75 0.97 SR Reach 40 1 YR 29 358 358.98 359.03 2.27 18.91 31.54 0.4 SR Reach 40 2 YR 46 358 359.18 359.26 2.73 25.84 36.62 0.44 SR Reach 40 10 YR 100 358 359.61 359.73 3.68 43.82 47.33 0.51 SR Reach 40 100 YR 191 358 360.08 360.25 4.67 68.68 59.29 0.57 SR Reach -5 1 YR 29 358 358.52 358.52 358.73 3.74 8.28 20.72 1 SR Reach -5 2 YR 46 358 358.69 358.69 358.94 4.11 12.09 26.73 0.97 SR Reach -5 10 YR 100 358 359.05 359.05 359.39 5.03 24.19 38.9 0.93 SR Reach -5 100 YR 191 358 359.44 359.44 359.89 6.03 41.44 49.41 0.93 SR Reach -42 1 YR 29 354 355.07 354.8 355.18 3.32 12.77 19.57 0.57 SR Reach -42 2 YR 46 354 355.26 355.02 355.43 4.13 16.84 22.64 0.65 SR Reach -42 10 YR 100 354 355.67 355.5 355.98 5.85 27.36 29.11 0.8 SR Reach -42 100 YR 191 354 356.1 356.04 356.59 7.62 41.49 35.51 0.93 SR Reach -81 1 YR 29 353.96 354.66 354.66 354.85 3.86 10.01 26.72 0.82 SR Reach -81 2 YR 46 353.96 354.81 354.81 355.05 4.49 14.09 28.66 0.87 SR Reach -81 10 YR 100 353.96 355.14 355.14 355.5 5.82 24.39 33.06 0.95 SR Reach -81 100 YR 191 353.96 355.55 355.55 356.06 7.11 39.05 38.46 1 SR Reach -135 1 YR 29 352.06 353.34 353.38 1.73 20.13 29.96 0.3 SR Reach -135 2 YR 46 352.06 353.66 353.71 1.89 30.06 32.15 0.29 SR Reach -135 10 YR 100 352.06 354.33 354.4 2.41 53.08 36.8 0.3 SR Reach -135 100 YR 191 352.06 355.26 355.35 2.82 90.09 43.32 0.29 SR Reach -190 1 YR 29 352 352.78 352.78 353.14 4.94 6.4 9.42 0.99 SR Reach -190 2 YR 46 352 353.13 353.13 353.51 5.19 10.78 16.02 0.86 SR Reach -190 10 YR 100 352 353.67 353.67 354.19 6.5 20.73 20.79 0.89 SR Reach -190 100 YR 191 352 354.93 355.22 5.37 53.87 31.89 0.55 SR Reach -225 1 YR 29 350 351.57 351.57 352.04 5.49 5.28 5.72 1.01 SR Reach -225 2 YR 46 350 351.95 351.95 352.51 6.03 7.63 6.84 1.01 SR Reach -225 10 YR 100 350 352.73 352.73 353.6 7.55 13.75 8.82 0.97 SR Reach -225 100 YR 191 350 353.74 353.74 354.91 8.9 24.02 11.36 0.92 SR Reach -260 Culvert SR Reach -295 1 YR 29 347.6 349.37 349.48 2.61 11.1 10.01 0.44 SR Reach -295 2 YR 46 347.6 349.68 349.84 3.2 14.39 10.99 0.49 SR Reach -295 10 YR 100 347.6 350.2 350.57 4.89 20.45 12.49 0.67 SR Reach -295 100 YR 191 347.6 350.72 350.53 351.48 7 27.29 14.07 0.89 SR Reach -350 1 YR 29 348 348.98 348.93 349.27 4.95 7.94 12.13 0.88 SR Reach -350 2 YR 46 348 349.25 349.25 349.61 5.74 11.79 16.37 0.91 SR Reach -350 10 YR 100 348 349.82 349.75 350.28 6.92 22.19 20.34 0.9 SR Reach -350 100 YR 191 348 350.37 350.33 351.06 8.77 34.44 24.5 1 SR Reach -418 1 YR 29 347.51 348.43 348.56 3.09 11.51 19.33 0.61 SR Reach -418 2 YR 46 347.51 348.58 348.77 3.98 14.32 20.01 0.72 SR Reach -418 10 YR 100 347.51 348.86 348.85 349.33 6.2 20.26 21.38 0.99 SR Reach -418 100 YR 191 347.51 349.39 349.39 350.07 7.65 32.1 23.94 1.02 SR Reach -465 1 YR 29 347 347.94 348.13 3.45 8.4 12.58 0.74 SR Reach -465 2 YR 46 347 348.15 348.15 348.33 3.63 17.78 60.35 0.69 SR Reach -465 10 YR 100 347 348.39 348.39 348.63 4.7 32.84 64.22 0.79 SR Reach -465 100 YR 191 347 348.65 348.65 348.99 5.88 50.26 68.42 0.89 SR Reach -611 1 YR 29 346 346.17 346.12 346.2 1.53 19.13 116.98 0.66 SR Reach -611 2 YR 46 346 346.22 346.17 346.27 1.81 25.68 117.99 0.68 SR Reach -611 10 YR 100 346 346.36 346.45 2.39 42.45 120.52 0.7 SR Reach -611 100 YR 191 346 346.55 346.69 2.99 65.21 123.87 0.71 SR Reach -770 1 YR 29 344 344.27 344.2 344.32 1.79 16.81 65.82 0.6 SR Reach -770 2 YR 46 344 344.36 344.27 344.43 2.14 22.52 68.56 0.63 SR Reach -770 10 YR 100 344 344.56 344.44 344.69 2.89 37.17 75.12 0.68 SR Reach -770 100 YR 191 344 344.81 344.67 345.01 3.7 57.05 83.21 0.72 PHASE II ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA SCE Blossom Consulting and Engineering Inc. 168 Old Field Rd Williamsburg VA 23188 p: 757-870-4825 14WAZI _1011 ISSUE REV # I DATE DESCRIPTION �LT H OF Q) G> SCOTT C. BLOSSOM a Lie. No. 40287 10 1111��61SrONAL Job No: 1005 Drawn By: BCE Date: 12.04.2017 Checked By: Scott C. Blossom, P.E. HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS SUMMARY SR-1 2