HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUB201800043 Review Comments 2018-04-23 Tim Padalino
From: Tim Padalino
Sent: Monday,April 23, 2018 11:04 AM
To: 'Bethany Velasquez'; 'Dustin Greene'; 'operations@dominioneng.com'
Subject: RE: Springhill/Towneplace Suites applications
Attachments: SUB2018-43_Review Comments_TMP_No Objection.pdf
Hello all,
Please find attached the updated review comment letter for application SUB201800043 (off-site easement plat for
Springhill/Towneplace Suites). As noted in the attached document, all previous review comments (contained in review
comment letter dated March 19) have been satisfactorily addressed in the revised resubmittal materials (dated April 3
and received April 11).
Please proceed with submitting signed and notarized plats for County approval.
Thanks in advance; and please let me know if you have any questions or requests for assistance. (And please confirm
receipt of this message,just to ensure I've provided it to the correct contacts.)
Thanks again ---
Tim Padalino, AICP
Albemarle County I Community Development Dept.
(434)-296-5832 x. 3088
From:Tim Padalino
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2018 1:28 PM
To: 'Mike Myers'<mmyers@dominioneng.com>; 'Bethany Velasquez'<bvelasquez@dominioneng.com>; 'Dustin Greene'
<dgreene@dominioneng.com>
Subject: RE:Springhill/Towneplace Suites applications
Hello Dominion Engineering,
After speaking with Dustin on the phone this morning, it's my understanding that Dominion would like to do the
following:
- Revise SUB201800042 to add/include the "proposed 24' interparcel access easement"that is shown on the
final site plan; and
- Revise both SUB201800042 and SDP201700042 to voluntarily add an additional access easement to provide
access between Seminole Trail and the "future development parcel."
Dustin indicated a preference for revising those two applications (both SUB201800042 and SDP201700042), as
described above, and sending me electronic excerpts via PDF for an informal review-- prior to printing revised
materials or printing signature copies. I am able to do that; although I will still finalize and send a review comment letter
for the final site plan tomorrow(even if there are revisions forthcoming and/or pending review comments from other
reviewers), as tomorrow is the County's internal deadline for me to do so.
i
Please also note that ACSA review and CDD-Engineering review are both still pending on both of those applications.
The other application related to this project that I am currently reviewing is SUB201800043 (off-site landscaping
easement). Because all of the reviews have been completed for this application, I have attached the review comment
letter for your reference. We are identifying one minor revision to be made, as discussed this morning.
Thank you; and please don't hesitate to contact me with any questions you may have, now or later.
Thanks again---
Tim Padalino, AICP
Albemarle County I Community Development Dept.
(434)-296-5832 x. 3088
From:Tim Padalino
Sent: Friday, March 16,2018 3:13 PM
To: Mike Myers<mmyers@dominioneng.com>; 'Bethany Velasquez' <bvelasquez@dominioneng.com>
Subject:Springhill/Towneplace Suites?
Hello Mr. Meyers and Ms. Velasquez,
I'm writing to ask a few questions about the following two applications for the Springhill/Towneplace Suites project that
are currently under review by the County:
• SDP201700042—Final Site Plan
• SUB201800042— Easement Plat ,
The Final Site Plan shows a"Proposed 24' Interparcel Access Easement"on Sheet SP6 (to satisfy the interparcel
requirement contained in condition of approval#1 for SP201600015). Prior to final site plan approval, this interparcel
access easement needs to be recorded on a plat. So prior to issuing any review comments for either application, I
wanted to reach out with the following questions:
• Would you like to revise the easement plat(SUB201800042) to include this proposed 24' interparcel access
easement?
(or)
■ Would you like me to proceed with reviewing and approving SUB201800042 as-is (without the proposed 24'
interparcel access easement), and submit a separate easement plat for the proposed 24' interparcel access
easement?
I wanted to check in with you about this Final Site Plan requirement prior to preparing any review comments, and offer
two possible solutions for your consideration. Thanks in advance for any feedback you provide on how you'd like to
proceed.
And please let me know if I can answer any questions, or if you'd like to discuss this prior to providing any feedback.
Thanks very much---
Tim Padalino, AICP
2