HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB201900126 Staff Report 2019-11-15ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT
Project #/Name
CCP-2019-02: Regional P25 Radio Infrastructure Project
Review Type
Advisory Review
Parcel Identification
076000000054P0, -54P1, - 54N1, and -54ZO
Location
County Office Building, 5' Street (COBS) — 1600 5t" Street (Figure 1)
Zoned
Commercial Office (CO)/Entrance Corridor (EC)
Owner/Applicant
County of Albemarle/Harris Corporation (Helen Moeller)
Magisterial District
Scottsville
Proposal
Establish a microwave radio communications facility supporting operations of the Charlottesville-UVA-Albemarle County Emergency Communications Center (ECC) at its C0135
backup dispatch and equipment facility. See "Project Details" and Attachment A for additional information.
Context
The subject parcel lies on the south side of 5' Street. Stagecoach Road is nearby on the east, south and west. Single family residences are on both sides of Stagecoach Road.
Residential apartment complexes and Region Ten offices are located on the opposite side of 5t' Street. A mix of residential types are in the general area. (Figure 1)
Visibility
See "Analysis Regarding Visibility" below.
ARB Meeting Date
September 3, 2019
Staff Contact
Margaret Maliszewski
,•, ji�p��b.S a4$
76-55E
� 75
I�lr3
'd s64q�#325
119J�461 355,
175 C 195
c10 9215
1frU;
105 : 7SdS f" 180 9
t ✓/ /. fy.� 200
2201
f- 46Fn�
7
- II11 500 � , 120. 240L �M25 �d
_ r �1
10 260t ttnn .2n 0 way
i 1 \- / 426 Any
�/ �295 . 27U 41'1f �
_ - 76-54
�_ 75 54J
- -__ 141.1 /
3'i-5+R1 1 1440"`-A
��, 1100142544 } I 11
13-
41 7o630
I
4i0 �s l 9OA k 110
L1 -876. 631 76-54N1
- 90A A-4� _
1 51.P Registi x` {; ti 11 9 11444 1105
r� ;-5� A--OB-1 f
6 ' sifice I
rl 615 �s 1 f /' 1600 - 5 5 `t � 1131
'1=
7 y4 r 90A--OA -42Z
1130 x 2A 9OA--QB - 1108r
7653D�+ = rf yl: , .Y4a II , 54�'u T 47V 1133 `t rA1110
/f .90, 1 570r H
Sbo ,-54�{ �_ •,t A$0 �` - ' �+, k .'� -ii Yq so
ice. �• .Y�
ff 581/{ r —} I 550. a m� _494 ,, 76 56B w 1135 ell
5_89. I j' 153U 1500 'Y �77 -
{ 565 1 �? C� 473; aL A-- F 1 k ` 113�J'
02 ri o
rF 583 ;' fr01 579 % ? 5471 its. y Rd.-- "�~ J kk',
cs 4
'•¢r
g coach ^'r. 406'
541 ;-5' 1 36 .y,
49 5
Figure 1: Project site
2
PROJECT DETAILS
The proposal includes a 123'-tall monopole with two microwave dish antennas, a 6' antenna mounted at 120' AGL and a 3' antenna at 67' AGL. An ice shield is proposed at 71' AGL. Related ground equipment
is also proposed. The facility is proposed to be located within the existing mostly enclosed parking and equipment area at the rear of the office building. (Figures 2 and 3)
1
Y
.L/J1 iM1 ALw EalIA A}dtNAY ��T
�YFi:lT IIC4°+L
1
�F UhC]Eb a FT —
w
�f e!'li.L a txc i
+tea caY:Ee T�*% Ra—
w
F iF TO-0 -
1
0
105 T 41
FOR REFERENCE ONLY
T"z a+Mu[Twua]Moa.eMRacF Yxc rcamnlo
IR5 FdLli®tTIGYd xNe1R A aFP AfiTi tCYIlRRaCT,
nN11RE4C�"A 1@f Fo1Hx MY lll{I exotree� IHY
w xwRvx ea aev"wl ae Menecemw rHmr
oxuxfMx.
�pll �c!011 P41l Fippr 19R4R 4AILY1f
aLT L{.YNx eiYFt¢f IRCp YkT IAMIaTiLC41YlI¢YLf
u J [Ka +FafRal4 SOl1Fe
!nT cluaa alSAIIIIISM wcT ee A1R1lJ'RO N
warYlfa av 1L.A6f aTaecnMAL [VYaYiR •""
•f ieF6eF181M� pF M1f.�FlTrtkM lb#JEe
!RJEl P PA ¢ 1Sa'Ff N9L l'TRA145 P""" 9 eT Fi..: al,
.r
TJ fAfy9� TClN51 J. I r
+a F1F1 w
VRpO a FT. 1JMsp3J41 1 ON 1fPf JM.
?� 1 NxeaT 4h1 aFi S1ST e.MPE " K
9EE e"EET wtY.l� _ _
An _ forge
RAP' Gxo wT,rvae F�y4
mwaar s
�®r a
N ht .rv+•.
mcr tkn IdTS �� KI .ae,.,rla.TrJr,
caaca.wLTxasY ]Icxx a -��./• - --
W R6"W aa' anM ,UM
_, e J+aillatuw T91F`e rMfBN4 t \:: _
a> wa gac—P
+ +lank TO L1]N}TiJJC[[a4
- a Iar.MfLl"WE AWFEMA 9PEEIFIZAThWA MCpddbWE.AMERNA IfterItIMM
.__ S iX1JaFT1>sJCT�•F�xa� .
Jets baen>.N96aw.n
�LCaLi
(P(YT� I I li w�}. l•x L nu
IIAIRl411f1] yLf- II _SA.
l-
uJOH W YM3
Pal !
4.tIN
cc*5
.- r nKn;.•� T
c'dti. ttlaFs •w T1Ji0 �S'
Ee
FiLifII'dF
MI)y4lTele/gYF.y PB..,
RI"S61F IYlsOi _ 'F.
_�vf iw� '-.zr� •; _ — ELLVA71411 i NM1TElrlta
eMrarcTa
rx ruu s
i!1 R
e IeN Hn-W�
e Sa NMA4Y1
e lL'aN1NN
Figure 2: Illustration showing the proposed monopole and dish antennas.
3
FROM 1&IKIIRDMIR710[is IaBE" taingIagluiguI51`►I1
A Certificate of Appropriateness from the ARB is required for the base equipment portion of proposed telecommunications facilities in the Entrance Corridors. The ARB may impose conditions on the Certificate
of Appropriateness, based on the EC Guidelines, and consistent with Section 5.1.40 of the Zoning Ordinance.
Ref
Guideline
Issues
Recommendations
Accessory structures and equipment
17
The following should be screened to eliminate visibility from the
Entrance Corridor street: e Mechanical equipment.
The ground equipment is not expected to be visible from the 5' Street Entrance Corridor
because the office building will provide full screening. (Figure 3
No objection.
I
yf�,L N f 1rf•'�y '.
V • 6 �y4
Figures 3a, b and c: The facility is proposed to be located within the mostly enclosed parking and equipment area at the rear of the COBS office building.
ANALYSIS REGARDING VISIBILITY OF THE FACILITY
The ARB may act in an advisory capacity to the Agent as to whether the facility is being sited to minimize its visibility. For reference in this analysis, please note that the test balloon measured 12' in diameter and
8' tall.
Ref
Guideline
Issues
Recommendations
Development pattern
33
The relationship of buildings and other
A balloon test was conducted on July 31, 2019 for this proposal. 5' Street/Old Lynchburg Road and I-64 were traveled to determine
Given the degree of
structures to the Entrance Corridor
visibility.
visibility displayed at
street and to other development within
the balloon test, the
the corridor should be as follows:
Traveling south out of the city on 5't' Street and viewing from the west side of the street, the balloon was first visible in the vicinity of
proposed location of
f. The placement of structures on the
Pinehurst Ct. (Figure 4) There, it was visible above the trees and it was sky -lit. Continuing south, at the first intersection with
the facility does not
site should respect existing views and
Stagecoach Road, the off -site trees at the corner of the intersection provided screening (Figure 5), but a short distance further south, a
sufficiently minimize
vistas on and around the site.
gap in the trees provided a clear view of the balloon (figure 6). Similar views were available traveling south on the west side of 5th
the visibility of the
Street (Figure 7). When viewed from vantage points on 5" Street north of the site, the taller section of the building (approximately 30'
monopole from the
tall) would completely screen the lower section of the monopole and all of the ground equipment.
5' Street and I-64
Entrance Corridors.
On the east side of 5'i' Street facing north at the southern Stagecoach Road intersection, the balloon was clearly visible. It was sky -lit
Negative visual
and above the trees. In this location, most of the monopole would be visible. (Figure 8) At the entrance to COB5 from 5'b Street the
impact is anticipated.
balloon was also visible (Figure 9). Again, it was sky -lit and above the trees, and much of the monopole would be visible. North of the
site entrance, a row of trees, in full leaf at the time of the balloon test, significantly screened the balloon from the street. (Figure 10) A
A shade of light grey
few gaps in the trees afforded a clear view of the balloon. (Figure 11) In those locations, the balloon was sky -lit and above the trees
is recommended for
and most of a monopole would be visible when viewed from those locations. The screening provided by the trees will be significantly
the color of the
diminished when the leaves drop, but the trees will still filter the view of the monopole. When viewed from vantage points on 5"' Street
monopole.
south of the site, the 16'-tall building would always completely screen the lowest portion of the monopole and the ground equipment.
When traveling both eastbound (Figure 12) and westbound (Figure 13) on 1-64, the balloon was visible between the Cavalier Crossing
and 5' Street Place Apartments developments. In those locations the balloon was sky -lit and above the trees. Westbound, the balloon
was significantly above the trees. From these vantage points, the balloon was over 1000' away and it was visible for (estimated) less
than 1000' along the 164 corridor. See Figure 14 for photo locations.
Although visibility of the balloon was limited in some ways, when the balloon was visible, it showed that a significant amount of the
monopole would be visible, sky -lit, and well above the trees. That level of visibility does not have an appropriate appearance for the
Entrance Corridor.
The color of the monopole is not identified in the applicant's submittal. Given the mostly sky -lit views, a shade of light grey would be
appropriate — not the brown typically preferred for monopoles in wooded areas.
The dish antennas, at 3' and 6' in diameter, will be obvious and will not blend in with the monopole as panel antennas can.
.ice ALr
Figure 4: View faring south on 51" Street in the vicinity of Pinehurst Ct.
Figure 6: View facing south on 51" Street, a short distance south of Stagecoach Road_
Figure 5: View facing south at intersection of 5l" Street and Stagecoach Road.
Figure 7: Typical view from the west side of 51r Street_
Figure 8: View facing north on 5111 Street at southern intersection with Stagecoach Road -
Figure 10: View north on 511 Street along CGB5 frontage.
Figure 9: View north on 5'1 Street nearCOB5 entrance.
Figure 11: View north from 511 Street looking towards COB5 office building.
Figure 12: View from eastbound lane of 164 facing south.
Figure 13: View from westbound lane of 164 facing south.
IT
lip
4_1
r
FV
. �•
5thtre Place opts.
` av�.Iir ass _
-01 _.
10
19
ie
I Y ,► y g 8
VO
IF
Figure 14: Photo locations.
VI
NOTE REGARDING ARB ADVISORY REVIEW
Section 30.6.9 of the zoning ordinance states that public health and safety shall prevail when any condition of a Certificate of Appropriateness conflicts with public health or safety. However, the ARB's role in
this review is limited to determining visual impacts on the Entrance Corridor. The Board of Supervisors will make a final determination on the proposal considering the ARB's advice, issues of public health and
safety, and all other recommendations and related information that body receives.
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Regarding the Certificate of Appropriateness for the ground equipment and base station:
Staff recommends that the ARB forward the following recommendation to the Agent:
Since the ground equipment will not be visible from the EC, the ARB has no objection to the ground equipment and base station as proposed.
Regarding visibility of the monopole:
Staff recommends that the ARB forward the following recommendation to the Agent:
1. Given the degree of visibility displayed at the balloon test, the proposed location of the facility does not sufficiently minimize the visibility of the monopole from the 5t' Street and I-64 Entrance
Corridors. Negative visual impact is anticipated.
2. A shade of light grey is recommended for the monopole.
10
ATTACHMENT A Applicant's project description
Regional P'25 Radio Infrastructure Protect (Charlottesville — UVA — Albemarle
County Emergency Communications Center)- C0135 site
Purpose:
The Emergency Communications Center (ECC) operates a regional 800 MHz public
safety land mobile radio system on behalf of the County of Albemarle, the City of
Charlottesville, and the University of Virginia. The system provides interoperable,
mission -critical communications to nearly 3,000 regional public safety and public service
users. As part of an enterprise -wide project to replace end -of -life infrastructure and
improve public safety communications coverage and reliability, the ECC is seeking to
,add 123-foot monopole tower (including foundation) at the Albemarle County Office
Building on Fifth Street (COBS).
Albemarle County Office Building -5h St. (COBS).
The COBS facility is a fundamental equipment location for the new regional
(Charlottesville, UVA, Albemarle) P25 Radio system currently under construction. COBS
is already the regional ECC's backup dispatch and equipment facility, including 9-1-1,
data systems, and dispatch equipment and space. This radio system is designed with
fully redundant capabilities, including redundant critical components and dispatch
infrastructure at COBS. In the case of a critical event, dispatch could be performed at
the COBS facility.
For reliable connectivity to the COBS facility, microwave radio is necessary. A tower is
required at the COBS location for mounting the microwave antennas at the proposed
heights. This provides a critical link to this facility to maintain continuous
communications with the overall P25 system.
TABLE A This report is based on the following submittal items:
Sheet #
Drawing Name
Latest Drawing Date
T1.1
Title Sheet
5/7/2019
C1.1
Site Plan
5/7/2019
C 1.2
Compound Plan
5/7/2019
C2.1
Elevation & Antenna Details
5/7/2019
C3.1
Cable Bridge Details
5/7/2019
C4.1
Details
5/7/2019
G1.1
Grounding Diagram
5/7/2019
G2.1
Grounding Riser
5/7/2019
G3.1
Grounding Details
5/7/2019
G4.1
Grounding Details
5/7/2019
GNI.1
General Notes
5/7/2019
GN2.1
General Notes
5/7/2019
GN3.1
General Notes
5/7/2019
14-18
Roof Protection Plan
4-2-19
Project Description
12