HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB201900129 Staff Report 2019-12-16ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT
Project #/Name
ARB-2019-129: Rio Road West Initial Site Plan
Review Type
Initial Site Development Plan (1 st review)
Parcel Identification
04500000010000, 045000000100A0, 04500000010100 & 04500000010 1BO
Location
664 Rio Road West, and adjoining parcels, near the intersection of Rio Road West and Berkmar Drive (Figures 1-5)
Zoned
Neighborhood Model District (NMD)/Entrance Corridor (EC)/Airport Impact Area (AIA)/Steep Slopes - Managed
Owner/Applicant
Auto LLC/Shimp Engineering (Justin Shimp)
Magisterial District
Rio
Proposal
To construct a four-story 59,560 sf mixed use building along Rio Road West with underground parking, a five story
100,000 sf self -storage building at the north end of the site, a parking lot, and associated site improvements on
approximately 3.31 acres.
Context
This portion of Rio Road West is primarily commercial in nature, with strip shopping centers, stand-alone businesses
and a public library nearby, but two residential buildings remain directly to the west (Figures 6-8). A car dealership
parking lot is directly behind (north of) the subject parcel. Many of the commercial buildings in the vicinity are two
stories tall. A significant portion of the adjacent development along Rio Road West predates the establishment of the
EC and, consequently, does not meet the requirements of the EC guidelines.
Visibility
If the entire development is built as illustrated, the south, east and west sides of the front mixed -use building will be
clearly visible from the EC (Rio Road West) and angled views of the rear self -storage building will be available. If the
self -storage building is constructed before the front mixed -use building, the south, east and west sides of the storage
building will be visible from the EC. The proposed building is 17' from the existing right-of-way, 6' from the proposed
right-of-way, and 24 1/2' from the Rio Road West edge of pavement.
ARB Meeting Date
December 16, 2019
Staff Contact
Paty Saternye
PROJECT HISTORY
The existing residence on site was built prior to the creation of the Entrance Corridor (EC) overlay district. The ARB reviewed other projects for these
parcels in 2003, 2004, 2006 & 2007, an SP in 2003 (ARB2003-184 Dennis Enterprises - advisory review) and Phase 1 of the Van Dine Plaza in 2007
(ARB2007-29). The ARB discussed the zoning map amendment for the Rio Road West project during a work session on December 3, 2018. The rezoning
was approved on August 21, 2019.
ANALYSIS
Gray highlight = means the guideline can't be reviewed at initial site plan stage, but recommendations can be provided for final.
Yellow highlight = means the guideline can only be reviewed for location/configuration at the initial plan stage
Regular text = means the guideline can be reviewed at initial plan stage, can be made a condition of initial plan approval, and can be the basis for denial
REF
GUIDELINE
ISSUE
RECOMMENDATION
Structure design
1
The goal of the regulation of the design of development
The site plan proposes two buildings at 4 and 5
None at this time.
within the designated Entrance Corridors is to insure that
stories in height, covering 35,090 sf of the site.
new development within the corridors reflects the
The front building includes underground parking
traditional architecture of the area. Therefore, it is the
and is located approximately 17' from the existing
purpose of ARB review and of these Guidelines, that
right-of-way, 6' from the future right-of-way after
proposed development within the designated Entrance
right of way dedication, and 24.5' from the EC
Corridors reflect elements of design characteristic of the
travelway. Architectural designs have not been
significant historical landmarks, buildings, and structures
submitted for review. Guidelines relating to
of the Charlottesville and Albemarle area, and to promote
architectural design will be addressed when the
orderly and attractive development within these corridors.
full architectural design is submitted for a formal
Applicants should note that replication of historic structures
review. However, note that the rear building is
is neither required nor desired.
proposed as a self -storage building, which can
present challenges for meeting the architectural
2
Visitors to the significant historical sites in the
Charlottesville and Albemarle area experience these sites as
guidelines. The site plan does not address the
ensembles of buildings, land, and vegetation. In order to
phasing of construction. Consequently, both
accomplish the integration of buildings, land, and
buildings will require ARB review and approval
vegetation characteristic of these sites, the Guidelines
with the final site plan. (See #35 for additional
require attention to four primary factors: compatibility with
related information.)
significant historic sites in the area; the character of the
Entrance Corridor; site development and layout; and
landscaping.
3
New structures and substantial additions to existing
structures should respect the traditions of the architecture
of historically significant buildings in the Charlottesville
and Albemarle area. Photographs of historic buildings in
the area, as well as drawings of architectural features,
which provide important examples of this tradition are
contained in Appendix A.
4
The examples contained in Appendix A should be used as a
guide for building design: the standard of compatibility
with the area's historic structures is not intended to impose
a rigid design solution for new development. Replication of
the design of the important historic sites in the area is
neither intended nor desired. The Guideline's standard of
compatibility can be met through building scale, materials,
and forms which may be embodied in architecture which is
contemporary as well as traditional. The Guidelines allow
individuality in design to accommodate varying tastes as
well asspecial functional requirements.
9
Building forms and features, including roofs, windows,
doors, materials, colors and textures should be compatible
with the forms and features of the significant historic
buildings in the area, exemplified by (but not limited to) the
buildings described in Appendix A [of the design
guidelines]. The standard of compatibility can be met
through scale, materials, and forms which may be
embodied in architecture which is contemporary as well as
traditional. The replication of important historic sites in
Albemarle County is not the objective of these guidelines.
11
The overall design of buildings should have human scale.
Scale should be integral to the building and site design.
13
Any appearance of "blankness" resulting from building
design should be relieved using design detail or vegetation,
or both.
14
Arcades, colonnades, or other architectural connecting
devices should be used to unify groups of buildings within
a development.
15
Trademark buildings and related features should be
modified to meet the requirements of the Guidelines.
16
Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should not be highly
tinted or highly reflective. Window glass in the Entrance
Corridors should meet thefollowing criteria: Visible light
transmittance (VLT) shall not drop below 40%. Visible
light reflectance (VLR) shall not exceed 30%.
Specifications on the proposed window glass should be
submitted with the application,for.final review.
5
It is also an important objective of the Guidelines to
Many of the buildings in the area predate the
None at this time.
establish a pattern of compatible architectural
establishment of the Rio Road West EC and,
characteristics throughout the Entrance Corridor in order to
consequently, do not meet the requirements of the
achieve unity and coherence. Building designs should
EC guidelines (Figures 6 & 8).
demonstrate sensitivity to other nearby structures within the
Entrance Corridor. Where a designated corridor is
Architectural designs have not been submitted for
substantially developed, these Guidelines require striking a
review. Guidelines relating to context and
careful balance between harmonizing new development
compatibility will be addressed when the full
with the existing character of the corridor and achieving
architectural design is submitted for a formal
compatibility with the significant historic sites in the area.
review.
10
Buildings should relate to their site and the surrounding
context of buildings.
12
Architecture proposed within the Entrance Corridor should
use forms, shapes, scale, and materials to create a cohesive
whole.
Accessory structures and equipment
17
Accessory structures and equipment should be integrated
A dumpster enclosure is shown on the site plan.
Include details for the
into the overall plan of development and shall, to the extent
However, a detail for the enclosure is not yet
dumpster enclosure and
possible, be compatible with the building designs used on
included and the type, manufacturer and color of
loading zone gates in the
the site.
the material of the screening wall are not
specified.
site plan. Identify screen
type, material, manufacturer
18
The following should be located to eliminate visibility from
the Entrance Corridor street. If, after appropriate siting, these
and color.
features will still have a negative visual impact on the
Existing mechanical equipment is shown on the
Entrance Corridor street, screening should be provided to
site plan, but no screening is provided for it. It is
Show how visibility of all
eliminate visibility.
located approximately 13' from the existing, and
mechanical equipment will
a. Loading areas, b. Service areas, c. Refuse areas, d.
2' from the proposed, right-of-way, so will
be eliminated from the EC.
Storage areas, e. Mechanical equipment, f. Above -ground
continue to have an impact on the EC.
utilities, and g. Chain link fence, barbed wire, razor wire,
and similar security fencing devices.
Gates are proposed in the storage building loading
zone. No details are included in the plan.
19
Screening devices should be compatible with the design of
the buildings and surrounding natural vegetation and may
consist of. a. Walls, b. Plantings, and c. Fencing.
21
The following note should be added to the site plan and the
The mechanical equipment visibility note is
None.
architectural plan: "Visibility of all mechanical equipment
provided on the plan.
from the Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated."
20
Surface runoff structures and detention ponds should be
The proposed layout impacts the majority of the
None.
designed to fit into the natural topography to avoid the need
parcel and only a small portion of the natural
for screening. When visible from the Entrance Corridor
drainage pattern will be preserved at the back of
street, these features must be fully integrated into the
the site along a section of the stream. Most of the
landscape. They should not have the appearance of
stormwater runoff will be stored in underground
engineered features.
storage facilities, no detention ponds are
proposed, so negative visual impacts are not
44
Natural drainage patterns (or to the extent required, new
drainage patterns) should be incorporated into the finished
expected.
site to the extent possible.
Li2htin2
No lighting lan has been submitted at this time.
None at this time.
Landscaping
7
The requirements of the Guidelines regarding landscaping
No large shade trees are proposed along the EC.
Revise the plan to provide
are intended to reflect the landscaping characteristic of
Ornamental trees are proposed along the EC, but
the required large shade
many of the area's significant historic sites which is
their species is not specified and there is
trees along the EC, at the
characterized by large shade trees and lawns. Landscaping
insufficient space allowed for the required large
required spacing and
should promote visual order within the Entrance Corridor
shade trees due to the close spacing of the
caliper. Revise the spacing
and help to integrate buildings into the existing
ornamentals.
and quantity of ornamental
environment of the corridor.
There are easements along the EC that could
trees accordingly.
8
Continuity within the Entrance Corridor should be obtained
by planting different types of plant materials that share
conflict with the required landscaping.
Revise the landscape
similar characteristics. Such common elements allow for
schedule to identify all plant
more flexibility in the design of structures because
The Proposed Landscape Schedule is incomplete.
species and to reflect
common landscape features will help to harmonize the
It does not include the plant species or quantity.
accurate quantities.
appearance of development as seen from the street upon
which the Corridor is centered.
Revise the plan to show that
there are no conflicts
32
Landscaping along the frontage of Entrance Corridor
streets should include the following:
between the utilities and the
a. Large shade trees should be planted parallel to the
proposed landscaping.
Entrance Corridor Street. Such trees should be at least 3'/2
inches caliper (measured 6 inches above the ground) and
See recommendation 37
should be of a plant species common to the area. Such trees
below.
should be located at least every 35 feet on center.
b. Flowering ornamental trees of a species common to the
area should be interspersed among the trees required by the
preceding ara a h. The ornamental trees need not alternate
one for one with the large shade trees. They may be planted
among the large shade trees in a less regular spacing pattern.
c. In situations where appropriate, a three or four board
fence or low stone wall, typical of the area, should align the
frontage of the Entrance Corridor street.
d. An area of sufficient width to accommodate the
foregoing plantings and fencing should be reserved parallel
to the Entrance Corridor street, and exclusive of road right-
of-way and utility easements.
33
Landscaping along interior roads:
Trees are not provided along the east side of the
Provide large shade trees,
a. Large trees should be planted parallel to all interior
eastern accessway and trees are not consistently
2'/2" caliper at planting,
roads. Such trees should be at least 2'/2 inches caliper
provided along the west side of the western
spaced 40 feet on center,
(measured six inches above the ground) and should be of a
accessway. (In this circumstance, perimeter
along the accessways.
plant species common to the area. Such trees should be
parking lot trees account for the interior travelway
located at least every 40 feet on center.
trees.
34
Landscaping along interior pedestrian ways:
There are large sections of pedestrian ways where
Provide medium shade
a. Medium trees should be planted parallel to all interior
medium trees have not been proposed. No trees
trees, at least 2%2" caliper
pedestrian ways. Such trees should be at least 2'/z inches
are proposed along the multi -use path on the north
planting, spaced 25 feet on
caliper (measured six inches above the ground) and should
side of the stream. There are also large portions
center, along pedestrian
be of a species common to the area. Such trees should be
of the sidewalk and pedestrian path along the west
ways. Show trees in a
located at least every 25 feet on center.
side of the parcel where trees are not proposed,
the species and size of the tree are not specified,
naturalistic planting pattern
along the multi -use path.
36
Landscaping of buildings and other structures:
a. Trees or other vegetation should be planted along the
or the species and size are insufficient to meet this
front of long buildings as necessary to soften the
guideline.
See recommendation 37
appearance of exterior walls. The spacing, size, and type of
below.
such trees or vegetation should be determined by the
The Proposed Landscape Schedule is incomplete.
length, height, and blankness of such walls.
It does not include the plant species or quantity.
b. Shrubs should be used to integrate the site, buildings,
and other structures; dumpsters, accessory buildings and
structures; "drive thru" windows; service areas; and signs.
Shrubs should measure at least 24 inches in height.
35
Landscaping of parking areas:
The quantity of perimeter parking lot trees
Provide large trees along
a. Large trees should align the perimeter of parking areas,
exceeds the requirement, but the type and size do
the perimeter of the parking
located 40 feet on center.
not. Evergreen trees are shown in some of these
area spaced 40' on center at
Trees should be planted in the interior of parking areas at
locations. Species are not identified, but mature
2'/2" caliper. Identify
the rate of one tree for every 10 parking spaces provided
width should be considered to avoid
species whose mature size
and should be evenly distributed throughout the interior of
encroachment in the accessways. Also, one
will not encroach in the
the parking area.
additional large interior parking lot tree is
accessways and parking
b. Trees required by the preceding paragraph should
required.
spaces.
measure 2'V2 inches caliper (measured six inches above the
ground); should be evenly spaced; and should be of a
It is anticipated that angled views into the parking
Provide an additional large
species common to the area. Such trees should be planted
lot will be available from the EC. Consequently,
tree within the interior of
in planters or medians sufficiently large to maintain the
shrubs added to perimeter parking planting areas
the parking area.
health of the tree and shall be protected by curbing.
would help mitigate impacts.
c. Shrubs should be provided as necessary to minimize the
Provide shrubs, 24" at
parking area's impact on Entrance Corridor streets. Shrubs
The proposed site plan does not address phasing
planting, in the perimeter
should measure 24 inches in height.
of construction, but early discussions with the
planting areas on the east
applicant revealed that it is likely that the self-
and west sides of the
storage building at the rear of the property will be
parking lot.
constructed first. Completion of the multi -use
building at the front of the property could be
Revise the plan to include a
delayed indefmitely. As such, it would not be
landscape plan that will be
available for reducing visibility of the self -storage
implemented in the general
building or the parking lot. In this case, negative
area of the Building 1
impacts could be mitigated by additional planting
footprint to help mitigate
located within the area of the Building 1 footprint.
the appearance of the self -
storage building and the
parking lot prior to Building
1 construction.
See recommendation 37
below.
37
Plant species: a. Plant species required should be as
The proposed plant species are not specified.
Revise the Proposed
approved by the Staff based upon but not limited to the
Landscape Schedule to
Generic Landscape Plan Recommended Species List and
specify the plant species.
Native Plants or Virginia Landscapes (Appendix D).
38
Plant health: The following note should be added to the
The note is provided on the site plan.
None.
landscape plan: "All site plantings of trees and shrubs shall
be allowed to reach, and be maintained at, mature height
the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall be
pruned minimally and only to support the overall health of
theplant."
Development pattern and site grading
6
Site development should be sensitive to the existing natural
The existing site is primarily open and grassy,
Revise the proposed
landscape and should contribute to the creation of an
sloping down from the EC to a small stream near
contours such that they
organized development plan. This may be accomplished, to
the northern edge of the parcel. There are a few
appear natural, rounded and
the extent practical, by preserving the trees and rolling
large existing deciduous trees (Figure 4).
have a minimum 10' radius
terrain typical of the area; planting new trees along streets
throughout the site where
and pedestrian ways and choosing species that reflect
The existing stream is to remain but will be
they blend with the existing
native forest elements; insuring that any grading will blend
impacted by the proposed grading. A portion of
topography.
into the surrounding topography thereby creating a
the stream is currently underground but will be
continuous landscape; preserving, to the extent practical,
restored to an above -ground stream channel.
Revise the retaining wall
existing significant river and stream valleys which may be
design to incorporate
located on the site and integrating these features into the
There are many areas where the proposed
terracing and planting for
design of surrounding development; and limiting the
contours do not appear to have a ten -foot
those over 6' tall.
building mass and height to a scale that does not overpower
minimum radius where they meet the adjacent
the natural settings of the site, or the Entrance Corridor.
condition and would not have a natural
appearance.
Revise the utility layout to
avoid conflicts with
39
The relationship of buildings and other structures to the
Entrance Corridor street and to other development within
required improvements.
the corridor should be as follows:
The proposed layout of the site plan is organized,
a. An organized pattern of roads, service lanes, bike paths,
with the proposed buildings parallel to Rio Road
See recommendation 37
and pedestrian walks should guide the layout of the site.
West and the parking located under and behind
above.
b. In general, buildings fronting the Entrance Corridor
the proposed Block 1 structure.
street should be parallel to the street. Building groupings
should be arranged to parallel the Entrance Corridor street.
The proximity of the building to the EC is much
c. Provisions should be made for connections to adjacent
closer than any of the other developments in the
pedestrian and vehicular circulation systems.
immediate area. However, it meets the setbacks
d. Open spaces should be tied into surrounding areas to
specified by the zoning map amendment and,
provide continuity within the Entrance Corridor.
prior to right-of-way dedication, it also meets the
e. If significant natural features exist on the site (including
County's current setbacks for the adjoining
creek valleys, steep slopes, significant trees or rock
properties. Therefore, future buildings along Rio
outcroppings), to the extent practical, then such natural
Road West should have a similar proximity.
features should be reflected in the site layout. If the
provisions of Section 32.5.6.n of the Albemarle County
An existing vehicle connection to one of the
Zoning Ordinance apply, then improvements required by
adjoining parcels is being maintained.
that section should be located so as to maximize the use of
existing features in screening such improvements from
There is a proposed sidewalk along Rio Road
Entrance Corridor streets.
West, but no bike lane currently exists. There is
f. The placement of structures on the site should respect
also a sidewalk and pedestrian path that connect
existing views and vistas on and around the site.
the sidewalk along the street to the proposed
multi -use path at the back of the site.
40
Site grading should maintain the basic relationship of the site
to surrounding conditions by limiting the use of retaining
walls and by shaping the terrain through the use of smooth,
Six retaining walls are proposed for the site. Four
rounded land forms that blend with the existing terrain. Steep
have a maximum height of 6'. Two have
cut or fill sections are generally unacceptable. Proposed
maximum heights of 12' and 20' but are not
contours on the grading plan shall be rounded with a ten foot
terraced. There are no trees proposed along the
minimum radius where they meet the adjacent condition.
12' high retaining wall, and except in the vicinity
Final grading should achieve a natural, rather than
of the dumpster pad, no shrubs are proposed along
engineered, appearance. Retaining walls 6 feet in height and
any of the retaining walls to minimize their impact
taller, when necessary, shall be terraced and planted to blend
on the EC and to allow them to blend into the
with the landscape.
landscape.
An existing utility pedestal, approximately 10'
from the curb along Rio Road West, is labeled as
remaining. However, it is shown in the middle of
the proposed sidewalk.
41
No grading, trenching, or tunneling should occur within the
There are a few existing trees along the northern
None.
drip line of any trees or other existing features designated for
edge of the parcel that are not shown to be
preservation in the final Certificate of Appropriateness.
removed. They do not appear to be designated as
Adequate tree protection fencing should be shown on, and
preserved. They are also approximately 40'
coordinated throughout, the grading, landscaping and erosion
below the grade of the EC.
and sediment control plans.
42
Areas designated for preservation in the final Certificate of
Appropriateness should be clearly delineated and protected
on the site prior to any grading activity on the site. This
protection should remain in place until completion of the
development of the site.
43
Preservation areas should be protected from storage or
movement of heavy equipment within this area.
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends the following as the primary points of discussion relative to the Initial Site Plan:
1. Visibility of buildings and timing of construction.
2. Mechanical equipment close to the EC without screening.
3. Retaining walls over 6' tall without terracing or plantings.
4. Lack of large shade trees along the EC.
5. Insufficient space for required trees on the west side of parcel.
Staff does not recommend approval of the initial site plan at this time and recommends that the ARB forward the following recommendations to the
Agent for the Site Review Committee:
• Regarding requirements to satisfy the design guidelines as per § 18-30.6.4c(2), (3) and (5) and recommended conditions of initial plan approval:
o Prior to Initial Plan approval the following items shall be resolved to the satisfaction of the ARB:
1. Revise the plan to include a landscape plan that will be implemented in the general area of the Building 1 footprint to help mitigate the
appearance of the self -storage building and the parking lot prior to Building 1 construction.
2. Revise the retaining wall design to incorporate terracing and planting for those over 6' tall.
• Regarding recommendations on the plan as it relates to the guidelines:
None.
• Regarding conditions to be satisfied prior to issuance of a grading permit:
None.
• Regarding the final site plan submittal:
A Certificate of Appropriateness is required prior to final site plan approval.
1. Include details for the dumpster enclosure and loading zone gates in the site plan. Identify screen type, material, manufacturer and color.
2. Show how visibility of all mechanical equipment will be eliminated from the EC.
3. Revise the plan to provide the required large shade trees along the EC, at the required spacing and caliper. Revise the spacing and quantity
of ornamental trees accordingly.
4. Revise the landscape schedule to identify all plant species and to reflect accurate quantities.
5. Revise the plan to show that there are no conflicts between the utilities and the proposed landscaping.
6. Provide large shade trees, 21/2' caliper at planting, spaced 40 feet on center, along the accessways.
7. Provide medium shade trees, at least 2%" caliper planting, spaced 25 feet on center, along pedestrian ways. Show trees in a naturalistic
planting pattern along the multi -use path
8. Provide large trees along the perimeter of the parking area spaced 40' on center at 21/2" caliper. Identify species whose mature size will not
encroach in the accessways and parking spaces.
9. Provide an additional large tree within the interior of the parking area.
10. Provide shrubs, 24" at planting, in the perimeter planting areas on the east and west sides of the parking lot.
10
11. Revise the proposed contours such that they appear natural, rounded and do not have less than a ten -foot radius throughout the site where
they blend with the existing topography.
12. Revise the utility layout to avoid conflicts with required improvements.
TABLE A
This report is based on the following submittal items:
Sheet #
Drawing Name
Drawing Date/Revision Date
C1
Cover
11/4/2019
C2
Existing Boundary & Zoning
11/4/2019
C3
Existing Conditions
11/4/2019
C4
Site Plan
11/4/2019
C5
Grading and Utility Plan
11/4/2019
C6
Landscape Plan
11/4/2019
C7
Site Details
11/4/2019
9
Arty d.Y.nAd b��hj or mMo.s. v.r dpi —rvd,y l:rmr.. p.p"q—. bonds. Rl q ,A nrusvlma,—a l— b— kr-dseQn, modRr or--im.—prm l",r ♦..;----,— o—z T19
IMa¢ip*.n1. maY: d. Wg. th. GIS OW m.wrwo n 1. W a. Prftd rm—�*Milo..d WQ 4w"pt"=k-u. m*p pog was" ww Wrrimr 4-1 IEM A8511
Figure]: Vicinity map.
12
Figure 2: The view from Rio Road West (EQ along east property line.
13
r
yr e.. ��� �,• .t '-�li �..
W.
Wl-
ff
Vt
44
_ � �.� ,� i : eA n .i;b� �. •���/!��j �F}{} w. .} e * �I� e' .� r4 ,1,r , tM '`� „'= . "��F+�c .. c.. a`d _
r
ntf+'.-'i':�ii.•
i� •�
5 s a J14S L �t i u df yyp
0 1 'i
M1� �h,
flr y . ^c 'a'�d -t �,S 'k_ g� �r�r ° , �9, ti +!+c[r. �{ � `,+ x . •
1 41i s
Klo
y
a S d jr -,-` �y
of N 1 e' K r y y 4
w-
)r dale
MMERCIAL .tea
so-sas4
Figure 6: View facing north on Rio Road showing the existing commercial building to the east of the site, and car dealership parking lot (on left) behind
the site.
17
Figure 7: Properties to the west of the site include the residences at 654 Rio Road West (at left of photo) and 660 Rio Road West (behind trees at right
side of photo).
18
•Y id_.r-. 'e � ti ' 4 -.fit . �,� .�;' �ti �.
•� ., yr � � - r• '� ^# _ `- ' • �, f �, �;r� ���,