HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201900065 Review Comments Initial Site Plan 2019-12-18COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126
December 18, 2019
Justin Shimp, P.E.
Shimp Engineering
912 E. High Street
Charlottesville, VA 22902
justin(a)shimp-en in�g com
RE: SDP201900065 Rio Road West — Initial Site Plan
Dear Mr. Shimp:
The Site Review Committee has reviewed the development proposal referenced above. Initial comments
from the following divisions of the Department of Community Development and other agencies, as
applicable, are attached:
Albemarle County Planning Services (Planner)
Albemarle County Engineering Services (Engineer) (attached)
Albemarle County Architectural Review Board (ARB) (attached)
Albemarle County Information Services (E911)
Albemarle County Building Inspections (attached)
Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue (attached)
Albemarle County Service Authority
Virginia Department of Transportation
Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority (attached)
Comments reflect information available at the time the development proposal was reviewed, and should
not be considered final. However, the Site Review Committee has attempted to identify all issues that
will be required to be resolved prior approval of the major site plan amendment.
Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
Lt, ' "
Cameron Langille
Senior Planner
Albemarle County Planning Services (Planner) — Cameron Langille, blan ilg_lekalbemarle.org — Required changes:
Comments to be addressed urior to initial site elan aunroval:
1. [32.4.2.3 and 32.4.2.41 See ARB comments #1-3. Based on ARB comments, the initial site plan cannot be
approved until a resubmittal is provided that addresses the ARB comments. The initial site plan will need to be
deferred so that the applicant can revise the drawings as necessary and staff can review and verify that those
comments are addressed. A deferral request must be sent to Planning staff no later than Friday, January 3, 2020.
Otherwise, the initial site plan will be denied in accordance with Section 32.4.2.5.
2. [32.4.2.1 (f)] Please submit payment for the required SRC meeting notification fee. Fee is $435.00 and must be
paid prior to approval of initial site plan. Payment must be received by Albemarle County prior to Friday,
January 3, 2020.
3. [32.4.2.3 and 32.5.2 (n)] See Fire & Rescue comment #1. The site layout needs to be revised so that an
unobstructed 26' wide aerial fire apparatus lane is located along one side of the mini -storage building. Until Fire
Rescue staff advise Planning staff that this comment has been addressed, the initial site plan will not be approved
until the layout is modified.
4. [ZMA201800013 and 32.5.2 (i)] As stated in Proffer #1 and shown on Sheet 4 of the Application Plan of
ZMA201800013, the owner is required to draft and record an access easement to allow for interparcel
connectivity and shared access to Rio Road for adjacent parcels. The site plan shows a possible interconnection
with TMP 45-102 to the east, but no interparcel connections are shown to the west with TMP 45-100B. The
access easement is intended to allow for a future local street ("Type C" local street cross-section as shown in the
Rio29 Small Area Plan). Please explain how this proffer will be met; there does not appear to be a suitable area
on site to establish the interparcel connection to the west due to the proposed sidewalks and retaining walls along
the western property boundary. The site layout may need to be revised so that a western interparcel connection
can be provided or be possible in the future.
[4.16] The site plan does not identify any recreational amenities as required by Section 4.16 of the Zoning
Ordinance. Recreational amenities shall be provided for every development of 30 units or more equal to
or exceeding four dwelling units per acre. Staff has concerns about there being adequate area within the
development to provide some of the required facilities as listed below.
a. [4.16.2.1] A minimum of 200 square feet of recreational area must be provided per dwelling unit
proposed, but this requirement shall not exceed 5% of the gross site area. Provide a calculation
that identifies how many square feet of recreational areas are required.
b. [4.16.2.1] The minimum facilities include one tot lot for the first 30 units, plus an additional tot
lot per each additional 50 unit increments. Tot lots must include the following:
i. One swing (four seats);
ii. One slide;
iii. Two climbers;
iv. One buckabout or whirl;
v. Two benches.
c. [4.16.2.1] Each tot lot shall consist of at least 2,000 square feet and shall be fenced, where
determined necessary by the director of planning and community development, to provide a safe
environment for young children.
d. [4.16.2.2] One-half court for basketball shall be provided for each 100 units, consisting of a 30-
foot by 30-foot area of four -inch 21-A base and 1% inches bituminous concrete surface, and a
basketball backboard and net installed at regulation height.
e. [4.16.2.1] Please be aware that substitutions of equipment or facilities may be approved by the
director of planning and community development, provided they offer a recreational amenity
equivalent to the facilities listed above, and are appropriate to the needs of the occupants. If the
applicant requests a substitution to these facilities and equipment, please provide a written
narrative of the request and explain what recreational amenities will be substituted for the Zoning
Ordinance requirements. If a substitution request is submitted and approved, the plan will need to
show the proposed recreational amenities and state square footage, equipment, etc. Cut -sheets
will be needed for any playground equipment proposed.
Comments to be addressed prior to final site plan approval:
6. [ZMA201800013] Please provide a block plan that identifies boundaries of Blocks 1-3 within the development,
as specified on Sheets 3 and 9 of the Application Plan. The final site plan must demonstrate that each block
meets the minimum acreages, block depths, and lot & building requirements (additional information shown on
page 6 of the Code of Development).
7. [ZMA201800013 and 8.5.5.1 (b)] Please provide a phasing plan that identifies/explains when improvements
will be provided in each block, as specified in Section X of the Code of Development and Proffers #2, #3, and
#5.
8. [ZMA201800013 and 32.5.2 (o)] Per Proffer #3, the multi -use path in Block 3 shall be dedicated to the County
for public access and maintenance prior to the development of any portions of the trail located directly adjacent
to the property. Concurrent with the dedication of the multi -use path, the owner shall dedicate a portion of the
property inclusive of the stream and north of the stream, approximately 0.4 acres, to the County to be
incorporated into a linear park network as shown in the Rio 29 Small Area Plan (dated December 12, 2018).
Although the dedication of the multi -use path and 0.4 acre park area do not need to occur prior to final site plan
approval, please provide an explanation on whether the owner will dedicate these features prior to final site plan
approval or at a later date.
9. [32.5.2 (a) and ZMA2018000131 Per Proffer #5A, the owner must dedicate eleven (11) feet of the property
along Rio Road W, as shown on Sheet 7 of the applicant plan, to public right-of-way. The subdivision application
for the right-of-way dedication must be approved and recorded prior to final site plan approval.
a. References to the instrument (deed book and page number) that recorded the right-of-way dedication
will need to be added to the final site plan.
10. [32.5.2 (a)] Albemarle County GIS shows that portions of the site lie within the Managed Steep Slopes Overlay
District. Please add this overlay district to the Zoning Note on Sheet C 1.
11. [32.5.2 (a)] Please revise the Zoning Note on Sheet C1. ZMA201800013 was approved on August 21, 2019.
12. [ZMA201800013 and 32.5.2 (a)] Due to the amount of lot and building regulations that apply to this site per
the Code of Development, please remove the setback and building heights notes on Sheet C1, and insert Table
D (including footnotes) from Section IX of the COD to Sheet Cl. This will ensure that all applicable lot and
building regulations are verified and complied with at time of building permit review and approval.
a. Please provide a note stating the percentage of lot coverage in all three blocks. See note 6 under Table
D for the definition of lot coverage.
b. [32.5.2 (n)] Please provide information on the height of proposed buildings in both stories and feet. If
stepbacks are required based on building heights, consult Table D and add notes clearly explaining where
steobacks apply to the proposed buildings.
13. [32.5.2 (a)] Please remove the proffer notes currently shown on Sheet C 1. Add the entire proffer
statement (including owner signature page) as an exhibit to the final site plan.
14. [32.5.2 (b) and ZMA2018000131 Please add Table B (including footnotes) from Section IV of the Code
of Development as an exhibit to the site plan.
a. Add lines to the note stating the acreage/size, number of dwelling units, gross density, and
amount of non-residential square footage proposed in each block.
15. [ZMA201800013 and 8.5.5.1 (b)] Please provide an exhibit/fagade rendering for the proposed Building
in Block 2 on the final site plan. The exhibit must demonstrate compliance with the Architectural
Standards specified in Section VII of the COD.
a. Include the Additional Architectural Standards table (including footnotes) from Section VII to the
exhibit. Provide evidence that facades of the Block 2 building meet all applicable standards.
16. [32.5.2 0)] Please label all existing water, sewer and drainage easements by type and include a size/width
measurement. State the deed book and page for the recorded instrument number in each easement label.
17. [32.5.2 (k)] Any new easements required for water, sewer, and drainage facilities will need to be
reviewed, approved, and recorded prior to final site plan approval. Please submit an easement plat
application the County for review. The final site plan will need to be updated so that all easements are
shown and labeled identifying easement type, whether it's public or private, a width dimension, and the
recorded instrument with deed book and page number.
18. [ZMA201800013 and 32.5.2 (b)] Please provide a table or note explaining the types of greenspace and
amenities that will be provided in each block in accordance with Table C from Section V of the Code of
Development.
a. Clearly identify and label these features on the site layout drawings.
19. [32.5.2 (n) and 4.12.61 Parking verification.
a. Please provide a calculation identifying what mix of uses are proposed in Block 1. The Parking
Schedule on Sheet C1 implies that dwellings will be provided in the Block 1 building, but the
plans do not state how many units per bedroom count. Provide this information so staff can
verify that adequate parking is provided.
b. Please provide a calculation of parking required for other uses (such as retail) that will be
provided in Block 1. The Zoning Ordinance has specific calculations for different commercial
and retail uses which could potentially occupy the building. Additional information of specific
uses proposed is necessary to verify adequate parking is being provided. Additional spaces may
be needed pending response to this comment.
c. Clearly state how many employees will be working in Block 2. The Parking Schedule only states
the standard and does not provide a calculation of the minimum required.
20. [32.5.2 (n) and 4.12.13(c)] No loading spaces are identified on the site plan. The Zoning Ordinance
requires that loading spaces be provided based on the following square footage of proposed uses: (1) one
space for the first 8,000 square feet of retail gross leasable area, plus one space for each additional 20,000
square feet of retail gross leasable area; (2) one space for the first 8,000 square feet of office space plus
one space for each additional 20,000 square feet of office space; or (3) one space for the first 10,000
square feet of industrial floor area plus one space for each additional 20,000 square feet of industrial floor
area.
a. Please provide a square footage calculation of the retail gross leasable area and office space in
Block 1 to determine how many loading spaces are required for Block 1.
b. Based on the proposed 100,000 sq. ft. of the self -storage in Block 2, six (6) loading spaces
complying with the design standards of 4.12.18 are required on -site.
c. Please be aware that the applicant may request a modification or waiver from the Zoning
Administrator to providing the minimum amount of required loading spaces in accordance with
Section 4.12.13. A Special Exception application must be filed if the applicant wants to request a
reduction to the loading space requirements, which includes a fee of $457.00.
21. [32.5.2 (a)] Please provide a breakdown of the types and quantities of dwelling units that will be
provided.
a. Identify the proposed density of the development.
22. [32.5.2 (n)] ADA compliant striping/accessible aisles must be provided within the site where handicap
accessible parking spaces are provided on opposite sides of travelways from building entrances. Please
provide striping from the handicap space at the rear of the site to the entrance of the building in Block 2.
a. See Inspections Division comments for additional requirements on the minimum number of
handicap spaces provided, as well as ADA signage.
23. 132.5.2 (n)] Profile view details of all proposed fences, retaining walls, and constructed screening measures will
be required with the final site plan. Each will need to show the types of materials used and dimensions.
a. See Engineering Division and Inspections Division comments for additional details on retaining wall
requirements.
24. [32.5.2 (n)] Per sheet 9 of the Application Plan, how will pedestrians cross the proposed travelway to connect to
the sidewalk along the western property boundary that leads down to Block 3? No ADA compliant ramps are
shown at sidewalk termination points, and no pavement striping is shown within the site.
25. [32.5.2 (n), 4.12.19, and 32.7.9.71 Please identify what screening measures will be provided for the proposed
dumpster pad area. If a constructed screen will be provided, include a plan and profile view of the enclosure
identifying materials, dimensions, etc.
26. [32.7.91 Please update the plant schedule so that the botanical name, common name, and quantity columns are
filled out. These columns are currently blank or state "TBD."
27. [32.7.9.61 Once the canopy provided within the parking lot has been identified, update the square footage of the
total canopy provided in the note on Sheet C6.
28. [32.7.9.813,700 sq. ft. of existing canopy will remain and count toward the total site canopy required (as currently
stated on Sheet C6) the owner will need to sign the Conservation Plan Checklist and this will need to be added
as an exhibit to the Landscape Plan.
a. [32.7.9.4 (b)] Verify the locations, species, and sizes of all existing vegetation that will remain and count
toward the canopy. Several trees are currently identified on Sheet C6, but these do not appear to make
up 3,700 sq. ft. of canopy. Verify/provide evidence that the canopy does total 3,700 sq. ft. if these are
the only items that will remain.
29. [32.7.9.81 The site plan does not currently state the proposed residential density. The landscape plan states that
the overall canopy required is 10%. This is true for Block 2 since it is only commercial/industrial use. However,
the canopy percentage required within Block 1 may be different depending on the proposed density, and the
landscape plan may need to be revised. The canopy requirements based on density are as follows:
a. [32.7.9.8 (a)] Gross density of 20 units/acre or more = 10% canopy;
b. [32.7.9.8 (a)] Gross density between 10 and 20 units/acre = 15% canopy;
c. [32.7.9.8 (a)] Gross density of 10 units/acre or less = 20% canopy.
30. [32.7.9.9 and ZMA2018000131 Please add a note to Sheet C6 stating "Landscape improvements in Block 1
shall be provided in accordance with the proffer statement provided with ZMA201800013. Block 1 shall be a
maintained landscape until the Block is improved with structures."
31. [32.7.8 and 4.171 A lighting plan will need to be included with the final site plan submission that complies with
all applicable regulations specified in Section 4.17 of the Zoning Ordinance. This includes:
a. Provide footcandle measurements within the property and along all property lines. Use a light loss factor
of 1.0 to determine footcandles on site.
b. [4.17.4 (a)] Provide manufacturer cut -sheets for all proposed outdoor luminaires.
c. [4.17.4 (a)] All proposed outdoor luminaries exceeding 3,000 lumens must be full -cutoff fixtures. Please
provide documentation from the manufacturers that all fixtures will be full -cutoff.
d. Please state the pole height of all outdoor luminaires.
e. [4.17.4 (b)] Add a note stating "The spillover of lighting from luminaires onto public roads and property
in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall not exceed one-half (1/2) foot candle."
f. Please add a note to which states "Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp that emits 3,000 or
more initial lumens shall be a full cutoff luminaire and shall be arranged or shielded to reflect light away
from adjoining residential districts and adjacent roads. The spillover of lighting from luminaires onto
public roads and property in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall not exceed one-half
footcandle."
Please contact Cameron Langille at the Department of Community Development at blan ig llekalbemarle.org or 296-
5832 ext. 3432 for further information.
Comments From Other Reviewers:
Albemarle County Engineering Services (Engineer) — Emily Cox, ecox2&a1bemarle.org — Requested changes, see
attached.
Albemarle County Architectural Review Board (ARB) — Paty Saternye, Psaternye@albemarle.org — Requested
changes, see attached.
Albemarle County Information Services (E911) Andy Slack, aslackkalbemarle.org, No objection.
Albemarle County Building Inspections — Michael Dellinger, mdellingerkalbemarle.org — Requested changes, see
attached.
Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue — Shawn Maddox, smaddoxgalbemarle.org — Requested changes, see
attached.
Albemarle County Service Authority — Richard Nelson, melson(&serviceauthority.org — ACSA review not yet
complete, comments or recommendations will be forwarded to the applicant upon receipt.
Virginia Department of Transportation — Willis Bedsaul, willis.bedsaul(&vdot.vir ig nia.gov — VDOT review not yet
complete, comments or recommendations will be forwarded to the applicant upon receipt.
Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority — Victoria Fort and Dyon Vega, vfortgrivanna.org and dvegakrinavvan.org —
Requested changes, see attached.
Cameron Langille
From: Emily Cox
Sent: Monday, December 9, 2019 12:43 PM
To: Cameron Langille
Subject: Planning Application Review for SDP201900065 RIO ROAD WEST - INITIAL - DIGITAL.
WPO plan must be approved before final site plan can be approved.
-Provide a detail for the proposed multi -use path.
-Retaining walls will need engineered design and building permits.
-Ensure all proffers are met (25% treatment on site and others).
The Review for the following application has been completed:
Application Number = SDP201900065
Reviewer = Emily Cox
Review Status = Requested Changes
Completed Date = 12/09/2019
This email was sent from County View Production.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126
December 17, 2019
Justin Shimp
Shimp Engineering
912 East High Street
Charlottesville, VA 22902
RE: ARB-2019-129: Rio Road West (TMP 04500-00-00-10000, 04500-00-00-100AO, 04500-
00-00-10100 & 04500-00-00-101 BO)
Dear Mr. Shimp,
At its meeting on Monday, December 16, 2019, the Albemarle County Architectural Review
Board unanimously voted to forward the following recommendations on the above -noted Initial
Site Development Plan to the agent for the Site Review Committee:
The ARB does not recommend approval of the initial site plan at this time. Prior to Initial Plan
approval the following items must be resolved to the satisfaction of the ARB:
1. Revise the plan to include a landscape plan that will be implemented in the general area of
the Building 1 footprint to help mitigate the appearance of the self -storage building and the
parking lot prior to Building 1 construction.
2. Revise the retaining wall design to incorporate terracing and planting for those visible walls
(from the EC) over 6' tall.
3. Provide site sections and correct FFEs.
Regarding the final site plan submittal:
A Certificate of Appropriateness is required prior to final site plan approval. In addition to the
required items listed in the Final Site Plan checklist, the following items must be addressed:
1. Include details for the dumpster enclosure and loading zone gates in the site plan.
Identify screen type, material, manufacturer and color.
2. Show how visibility of all mechanical equipment will be eliminated from the EC.
3. Revise the plan to provide the required large shade trees along the EC, at the
required spacing and caliper. Revise the spacing and quantity of ornamental trees
accordingly.
4. Revise the landscape schedule to identify all plant species and to reflect accurate
quantities.
5. Revise the plan to show that there are no conflicts between the utilities and the
proposed landscaping.
6. Provide large shade trees, 2'/" caliper at planting, spaced 40 feet on center, along
the accessways.
7. Provide medium shade trees, at least 21/" caliper planting, spaced 25 feet on center,
along pedestrian ways. Show trees in a naturalistic planting pattern along the multi-
use path
8. Provide large trees along the perimeter of the parking area spaced 40' on center at
2'/2" caliper. Identify species whose mature size will not encroach in the accessways
and parking spaces.
9. Provide an additional large tree within the interior of the parking area.
10. Provide shrubs, 24" at planting, in the perimeter planting areas on the east and west
sides of the parking lot.
11. Revise the proposed contours such that they appear natural, rounded and do not
have less than a ten -foot radius throughout the site where they blend with the
existing topography.
12. Revise the utility layout to avoid conflicts with required improvements.
You may submit your application for continued ARB review at your earliest convenience. Application
forms, checklists and schedules are available on-line at www.albemarle.org/ARB. Please be certain
that your ARB submittal addresses the above -noted issues.
If you have any questions concerning any of the above, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely�� rJ
Paty stern
Senior Planner
cc: Auto LLC
1389 Richmond Road
Charlottesville, VA 22901
File
Review Comments for SDP201900065 Initial Site Plan
Project Name: RID ROAD WEST - INITIAL - DIGITAL
DateCompleted: Friday, November 08, 2019 Department/Division/Agency: Review St,
Reviewer: Andrew Slack
No objection_
DD E911
No Objecti
Review Comments for SDP201900065 Initial Site Plan
Project Name: RI ROAD WEST - INITIAL - DIGITAL
Date Completed: Thursday, November 07. 2019 DepartmentlDivisionlAgency: Review Status:
Reviewer: Michael Dellinger
CDD Inspections Requested Changes
Using most restrictive table, 5 HO spaces need to be provided_ Table 1106.1( ) VOO_
Add the follo}r5,ing note to the general notes page:
Accessible parking spaces and access isles shall not have a surface slope greater than 148 Access isles shall be at the
same level as the parking space they serve_ Please provide critsheet for accessible parking }r5,ith signage requirements
Add the follo}r5,ing to the general notes page:
All roof drains shall discharge in a manner not to carise a public nriisance and not over side,,valks
Page: County of Albemarle Printed On: 12 18120'19
Review Comments for SDP201900065 11nitial Site Plan
Project Name: RI ROAD WEST - INITIAL - DIGITAL
Date Completed: Wednesday, December 18, 201 DepartmentlaivisionlAgency: Review Sys:
Reviewer: Shawn Maddox Fire Rescue Reueste changes
1 _ Due to the size, and height, of the building an aerial fire apparatus lane of 6' unobstructed width must be provided no closer
than 16' and no farther than 30' from the structure along one contiguous side_ The mini storage building does not meet this requirement-
_ A knox box will be required for each building, please add a note indicating this requirement-
3- Based on current parking and access there is not access within 150 feet (45 T20 mm) of all portions of the facility and all
portions of the exterior walls of the first story of the building as measured by an approved route arorind the exterior of the
building or facility-
4- 1 do not see any fire hydrants located on site_ If these buildings are to be sprinklered you must show the FDD and have a
hydrant within 100' of the connection_ Hydrants should be provided on site to meet the 500' spacing requirement_ These should
be arranged to ensure that during their use traffic flow is not impacted.
5_ The travel way serving as the aerial fire apparatus access along each building shall be marked no parking fire lane
6_ Provide the ISO needed fire flow for each structure and provide the current fire flow available on site_
Page: County of Albemarle Printed On: 12 18120'19
Cameron Langille
From: Dyon Vega <DVega@rivanna.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2019 8:03 AM
To: Cameron Langille
Cc: vfort@rivanna.org; Richard Nelson
Subject: SDP201900065 Rio Road West Initial site plan comments
CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open
attachments unless you are sure the content is safe.
Cameron,
RWSA has reviewed the Rio Road West initial site plans and has the following comments:
General comments:
RWSA will require a sewer flow acceptance prior to final site plan approval.
The request will need to be sent to us by ACSA and will include the following:
• Estimated average daily dry weather sewage flow (ADDWF)
• Point of connection into RWSA system (which manhole)
• Number of units/square footage
• Estimated in-service date
Let me know if you have any questions.
Dyon Vega
Civil Engineer
WATER& SEWERAUTH0RITY
Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority
(434) 977-2970, Ext. 170
695 Moores Creek Lane
Charlottesville, VA 22902
www.rivanna.org
Cameron Langille
From: Victoria Fort <vfort@rivanna.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2019 4:48 PM
To: Cameron Langille
Cc: Dyon Vega; Richard Nelson
Subject: SDP201900065 Rio Road West - Initial Site plan
CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open
attachments unless you are sure the content is safe.
Cameron,
RWSA has reviewed the initial site plan for Rio Road West and has the following comment:
1. A sewer flow capacity certification will be required prior to final site plan approval if the proposed development is
anticipated to produce over 40,000 gallons of sewage per day.
Thank you,
Victoria
Victoria Fort, P.E.
Senior Civil Engineer
Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority
695 Moores Creek Lane
Charlottesville, VA 22902
(0): (434) 977-2970 ext. 205
(F): (434) 295-1146