Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201600058 Review Comments Major Amendment, Final Site Plan 2019-12-27COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126 Date: November 21, 2016 UPDATED: December 1, 2016 (includes zoning comments) Rev. 1: April 10, 2017 Rev. 2: October 29, 2018 Rev. 3: July 12, 2019 Rev. 4: December 27, 2019 Tim Miller Meridian Planning Group 440 Premium Circle Charlottesville, VA 22901 RE: SDP 201600058 Daly's Rent All — Major Amendment Dear Sir: Your Major Amendment application has been reviewed. In order for the amended site plan to be approved the following revisions are required: 15. [32.5.2(e) & 32.6.26)] Provide on the existing condition sheet the existing landscape features within the parcel. Also, show any existing landscape features that are to remain on the landscaping sheet and differentiate them from the proposed landscaping. Provide the information specified in 32.7.9.4(c). If existing trees are to be counted towards the landscaping calculations also include the information required in 32.7.9.4(b). Rev. 3: Comment not yet fully addressed. Address the following: b) Have the owner of the site sign and date the conservation checklist stating they agree to its requirements. Rev. 4: Comment not addressed. Applicant stated this will be done on signature sets. So comment will remain until site plan is ready for approval. c) Show "Tree Protection Fencing" around the outer edge of the shrubs that are to remain that are within the subject parcel but directly adjacent to TMP 61 W 2-13-5. Rev. 4: Comment not fully addressed. Revise the fence, and labels for the fence around the "existing shrubs to remain" so that it is clear what the fence is for and so that fence it self, on the side of the disturbed area, can be clearly seen. Please note these shrubs are not shown in the existing conditions sheet. If they exist show them on the existing conditions sheet. If they do not exist no longer show them on the site plan as "existing" Pagel of 3 19. [32.5.2(k) & 32.6.2(e)] Submit an easement and a deed of easement and plat for the relocated 20' Public Drainage Easement for review. County Attorney's approval will be required prior to approval of the Major Site Plan Amendment. Rev. 3: Comment not yet fully addressed. Submit an easement plat and a deed of easement for the relocated 20' Public Drainage Easement for review. County Attorney's approval will be required prior to approval of the Major Site Plan Amendment. Rev. 4: Comment not fully addressed. An easement plat was submitted but administratively denied. Address the items specified in the denial letter and then submit a new easement plat Ensure the deed of easement for the relocated 20' Public Drainage Easement is also submitted with the plat for review. County Attorney's approval will be required prior to approval of the Major Site Plan Amendment. The easement plat for the relocated 20' Public Drainage Easement must be approved, recorded, and the recordation receipt provided to the planning reviewer prior to approval of the site plan. 20. [32.5.2(k) & 32.6.2(e)] Submit a deed of easement for the proposed Storm Water Management Basin SWM-1 and its outfall pipe. County Attorney's approval will be required prior to approval of the Major Site Plan Amendment. Rev. 3: Comment not yet fully addressed. Submit an easement plat and a deed of easement for the Storm Water Management Basin and 20' Public Drainage Easement for review. County Attorney's approval will be required prior to approval of the Major Site Plan Amendment. Engineering will forward the template for the deed of easement for this plat. Rev. 4: Comment not fully addressed. An easement plat was submitted but administratively denied. Address the items specified in the denial letter and then submit a new easement plat Ensure the deed of easement for the relocated 20' Public Drainage Easement is also submitted with the plat for review. County Attorney's approval will be required prior to approval of the Major Site Plan Amendment. The easement plat for the Storm Water Management Basin SWM- 1 and its outfall pipe must be approved recorded and the recordation receipt provided to the planning reviewer prior to approval of the site plan. 33. [32.7.9 & 32.6.20)] Revise the landscape plan to meet all requirements of section 32.7.9. Address the following comments: Rev. 3: Comment not yet fully addressed. Address the following: a) [32.7.9.5(d)] Two trees that were previously along the street, and were meeting street tree requirements, are no longer located along the street. Revise their location to be along the street as they were in the last submission or provide two new trees along the street in their place. Although there are requirements for trees between the parking lot and the street, because the parking lot is so close to the street staff will accept the two trees (street trees), instead of four (street trees and parking lot trees), as long as the trees are placed along the street tree in alignment with the other street trees. Rev. 4: Comment not fully addressed. Three additional trees have been added to meet the street tree requirement. However, they are not evenly spaced, as street trees are meant to be, and thev are in close proximity to the existing large shade trees. When large shade trees are planted too close together they will damage the existing trees. Revise the spacing so that they are spaced more evenly, on comparison to the existing trees and are not planted closer than 25' to another existing or proposed large shade tree. b) Rev. 4: fNew Comment] Revise the street tree calculation on the site plan to match the currently provided number of street trees. This calculation has not been revised to what is currently proposed. c) Rev. 4: [New Commentl Revise the existing conditions sheet to show the existing trees and shrubs currently on the site. Some changes to the site appear to have happened since the initial submission of this site plan. Page 2 of 3 36. [Comment] The major site plan amendment will not be approved until the WPO plan is submitted and approved. Rev. 3: Comment not yet fully addressed. See engineering comments. The major site plan amendment will not be approved until the WPO plan is approved. Rev. 4: Comment not fully addressed. See engineering comments. The major site plan amendment will not be approved until the WPO plan is approved. 38. [Comment] The major site plan amendment will not be approved until Engineering, Inspections, E911, VDH, ARB, ACSA, VDOT, Fire Rescue and Zoning grant their approval. See the attached comments for these reviewers. Any outstanding review comments will be forwarded to you when they have been received. Rev. 3: Comment not fully addressed. See the attached comments from the reviewers. Rev. 4: Comment not fully addressed. See the attached comments from the reviewers. Staff has provided references to provisions of Chapter 18 of the Code of the County of Albemarle. The Code is kept up to date by the County Attorney's office. The Code may found on the County Attorney's website which may be found under "Departments and Services" at Albemarle.org. In accord with the provisions of Section 32.4.3.5 of Chapter 18 of the Code if the developer fails to submit a revised major site plan amendment to address all of the requirements within six (6) months after the date of this letter the application shall be deemed to have been voluntarily withdrawn by the developer. If you have any questions about the comments please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, --- -5� Paty Sat Senior Planner Planning Division 434-296-5832 ext.3250 psaternye(a'D-albemarle.org CC: Greenbrier East, LLC Page 3 of 3 Stephen C. Brich, P.E. Commissioner rrve"',ij COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1601 Orange Road Culpeper Virginia 22701 December 12, 2019 County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Attn: Paty Saternye Re: Daly's Rent All- Major Site Plan Amendment SDP-2016-00058 Review #5 Dear Ms. Saternye: The Department of Transportation, Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use Section, has reviewed the above referenced request dated September 26, 2016, revised November 11, 2019 and offers the following comment: Land Use 1. Please provide post -development drainage calculations, were not provided in plan set? Please provide two copies of the revised plan along with a comment response letter. If further information is desired, please contact Willis C. Bedsaul at 434-422-9866. A VDOT Land Use Permit will be required prior to any work within the right-of-way. The owner/developer must contact the VDOT Charlottesville Residency Land Use Section at (434) 422-9399 for information pertaining to this process Sincerely, ot� Adam J. Mo e, P. '. Area Land Use Engineer Charlottesville Residency WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING Review Comments for SDP201600058 M ajor Ame nd me nt. Project Name: Dal}i s Rent All - Major Date Completed: Thursday, December 26, 2019 DepartmentIDivisionfAgency: Review Sys: Reviewer: Richard Nelson ADA Requested Changes 019-1 - 6: Provide 5' of additional easement for sewer run B-D_ Provide 10' of additional easement for sewer run A-B_ 019-11-13: Applicant sent reviewer 1 copy directy_ n Page: County of Albemarle Printed On: 1 12f2712019 VIRGlN1P County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Patricia Saternye From: Emily Cox Date: 02 Oct 2018 Rev. 1: 03 June 2019 Rev. 2: 27 Nov 2019 Subject: Daly's Rent All (SDP201600058) The major site plan amendment for Daly's Rent All has been reviewed by Engineering. The following comments will need to be addressed before approval: 1. WPO Plan must be submitted and approved before final site plan can be approved. Rev. 1: comment not addressed. Rev. 2: Comment not addressed. WP0201700022 must be approved before final site plan can be approved. 2. Please ensure the professional seal is signed and dated. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 3. Topography should at least be visually field verified within in the last year. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 4. Provide top and bottom elevations of the retaining wall. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 5. Ensure deed book and page are shown for all existing easements (Right-of-way, sanitary, etc). Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 6. Label the easement around the stormwater facility as, "SWM facility easement". Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 7. Ensure there is adequate travelway in front of the loading area (show dimension). Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 8. Parking areas shall not exceed 5% grade anywhere in any direction. Southern parking area exceeds this slope. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 9. Rev. 1: Parking label on Sheet C-201 appears incorrect. Space is labeled as 16ft, but label says 9xl8. Please clarify. Rev. 2: Comment addressed. 10. Rev. 2: Please note that the drainage easements and SWM facility easement must be recorded before final site plan can be approved.