Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB201900148 Staff Report 2019-12-30n;z.:1100(111U1ARw;7*1IWANT17.113 1F.1WW;701z)'AN Project #/Name ARB-2019-148: Overlook Hotel Initial Site Plan Review Type Initial Site Development Plan Parcel Identification 07800-00-00-073A7 Location The south side of Rt. 250 East approximately 250' west of the Hansen Rd./Rt. 250 intersection (See Fig. 1.) Zoned Planned Development Mixed Commercial (PDMC), Entrance Corridor (EC) Owner/Applicant DJCM Investments LLC/Shimp Engineering (Justin Shimp) Magisterial District Rivanna Proposal To construct a four-story 75,000 sf hotel with parking beneath. Context The subject property is comprised of a single vacant parcel. Another vacant parcel is adjacent to the west. The area is characterized by a mix of residential and commercial development (Fig. 1). Visibility The proposed development will be readily visible from the Entrance Corridor. ARB Meeting Date January 6, 2020 Staff Contact Khris Taggart PROJECT HISTORY The ARB has reviewed no previous proposals for this site. 1381 1389 ` �8-'Ilk 1 78-73A7 15 4+ r\78-73A 6+ J 200 !r d� �.n1tisEn"R 142 Fig. 1: Google Image (left) showing project area along the Entrance Corridor and County GIS map (right) highlighting subject property. 2005 ANALYSIS Gray highlight = means the guideline can't be reviewed at initial site plan stage, but recommendations can be provided for final Yellow highlight = means the guideline can only be reviewed for location/configuration at the initial plan stage Regular text = means the guideline can be reviewed at initial plan stage, can be made a condition of initial plan approval, and can be the basis for denial REF GUIDELINE ISSUE RECOMMENDATION GENERAL GUIDELINES Purpose I The goal of the regulation of the design of development Architectural designs have not been provided None at this time. within the designated Entrance Corridors is to ensure that for review at this time. This guideline can be new development within the corridors reflects the reviewed when they are submitted. traditional architecture of the area. Therefore, it is the purpose of ARB review and of these Guidelines, that proposed development within the designated Entrance 2 Corridors reflect elements of design characteristic of the significant historical landmarks, buildings, and structures bf the Charlottesville and Albemarle area, and to promote 6rderly and attractive development within these corridors. Applicants should note that replication of historic structures is neither required nor desired. 2 Visitors to the significant historical sites in the Conformity with this guideline can be fully None at this time. Charlottesville and Albemarle area experience these sites assessed when architectural designs are as ensembles of buildings, land, and vegetation. In order submitted for review. Site layout and to accomplish the integration of buildings, land, and landscaping are addressed below. vegetation characteristic of these sites, the Guidelines require attention to four primary factors: compatibility with significant historic sites in the area; the character of the Entrance Corridor; site development and layout; and landscaping. 3-5, Compatibility with significant historic sites, compatibility Architectural designs were not provided with None at this time. 9-16 with character of the Entrance Corridor, structure design the initial plan. This guideline can be reviewed when they are submitted. Accessory structures and equipment 17 Accessory structures and equipment should be integrated The location(s) of mechanical equipment is Show the location of into the overall plan of development and shall, to the not labeled on the plan. mechanical equipment extent possible, be compatible with the building designs (building and ground used on the site. mounted) on the site and architectural plans and 18 The following should be located to eliminate visibility from the Entrance Corridor street. If, after appropriate siting, show how it will be these features will still have a negative visual impact on the screened from the EC. Entrance Corridor street, screening should be provided to eliminate visibility. a. Loading areas, b. Service areas, c. Refuse areas, d. Storage areas, e. Mechanical equipment, f. Above -ground utilities, and g. Chain link fence, barbed wire, razor wire, and similar security fencing devices. 19 kcreening devices should be compatible with the design of buildings and surrounding natural vegetation and may onsist of. a. Walls, b. Plantings, and c. Fencing. 21 he following note should be added to the site plan and the The note appears on sheet C 1. None. rchitectural plan: "Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated." 22- Lighting No lighting is included in the initial plan. None at this time. 31 Landscaping 7 The requirements of the Guidelines regarding landscaping Tree species and sizes have not been Provide a complete plant are intended to reflect the landscaping characteristic of provided. schedule with the next many of the area's significant historic sites which is submittal. characterized by large shade trees and lawns. Landscaping Due to the narrowness of the frontage along should promote visual order within the Entrance Corridor the EC, a standard row of large Show how landscaping, and help to integrate buildings into the existing shade/ornamental trees is not feasible. A retaining walls and environment of the corridor. coordinated appearance among the retaining walls, plantings, and building signage along signage will be coordinated at the street 8 Continuity within the Entrance Corridor should be obtained by planting different types of plant materials tha� the EC will be important for integrating this frontage and how an share similar characteristics. Such common elements development into the EC. Perspective appropriate appearance allow for more flexibility in the design of structures renderings are recommended. for the EC will be because common landscape features will help to achieved. Perspective harmonize the appearance of development as seen from renderings are the street upon which the Corridor is centered. recommended. 32 Landscaping along the frontage of Entrance Corridor streets should include the following: a. Large shade trees should be planted parallel to the Entrance Corridor Street. Such trees should be at least 3 %2 inches caliper (measured 6 inches above the ground) and should be of a plant species common to the area. Such trees should be located at least every 35 feet on center. b. Flowering ornamental trees of a species common to the area should be interspersed among the trees required by the preceding paragraph. The ornamental trees need not alternate one for one with the large shade trees. They may be planted among the large shade trees in a less regular spacing pattern. c. In situations where appropriate, a three or four board fence or low stone wall, typical of the area, should align the frontage of the Entrance Corridor street. d. An area of sufficient width to accommodate the foregoing plantings and fencing should be reserved parallel to the Entrance Corridor street, and exclusive of road right-of-way and utility easements. 33 Landscaping along interior roads: No interior roads are present in this site. None. a. Large trees should be planted parallel to all interior roads. Such trees should be at least 2%2 inches caliper (measured six inches above the ground) and should be of a plant species common to the area. Such trees should be located at least every 40 feet on center. 34 Landscaping along interior pedestrian ways: No pedestrian paths are proposed interior to None. a. Medium trees should be planted parallel to all interior the site. pedestrian ways. Such trees should be at least 2'/2 inches caliper (measured six inches above the ground) and should be of a species common to the area. Such trees should be located at least every 25 feet on center. 35 Landscaping of parking areas: The trees along the west side of the parking Provide large perimeter a. Large trees should align the perimeter of parking areas, area do not meet the spacing requirement. parking lot trees, 2'/2" located 40 feet on center. Trees should be planted in the caliper at planting, at 40' interior of parking areas at the rate of one tree for every 10 on center. parking spaces provided and should be evenly distributed There are 73 surface parking spaces exterior throughout the interior of the parking area. to the building. This will require 7 interior Add 6 interior parking lot b. Trees required by the preceding paragraph should parking lot trees. Currently, there is 1 interior trees on the landscaping measure 2'/2 inches caliper (measured six inches above the tree proposed, so 6 additional trees are plan. ground); should be evenly spaced; and should be of a needed to meet the requirement. This could species common to the area. Such trees should be planted be possibly done by converting extra parking in planters or medians sufficiently large to maintain the spaces to interior parking islands and adding health of the tree and shall be protected by curbing. more trees along the west perimeter of the c. Shrubs should be provided as necessary to minimize the parking area. parking area's impact on Entrance Corridor streets. Shrug should measure 24 inches in height. 36 Landscaping of buildings and other structures: There is currently no landscaping shown None at this time. a. Trees or other vegetation should be planted along the along the perimeter of the building on the front of long buildings as necessary to soften the landscaping plan. This guideline can be appearance of exterior walls. The spacing, size, and type reviewed when architectural designs are of such trees or vegetation should be determined by the submitted. length, height, and blankness of such walls. b. Shrubs should be used to integrate the site, buildings, and other structures; dumpsters, accessory buildings and structures; "drive thru" windows; service areas; and signs. Shrubs should measure at least 24 inches in height. 37 Plant species: Plant species are not identified. Provide a complete plant a. Plantspecies required should be as approved by the schedule with the next Staff based upon but not limited to the Generic Landscape submittal. Plan Recommended Species List and Native Plants for Virginia Landscapes (Appendix D . 38 Plant health: The note is not present on plan. Add the plant health note The following note should be added to the landscape plan: to the plan. i`All site plantings of trees and shrubs shall be allowed to [each, and be maintained at, mature height; the topping of Fees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall be pruned minimally and only to support the overall health of the lant." Site Development and layout 6 Site development should be sensitive to the existing There are existing trees at the rear of the Show existing trees, tree natural landscape and should contribute to the creation of subject property; however, no existing tree conservation easement an organized development plan. This may be lines are shown on the existing conditions and landscaping easement accomplished, to the extent practical, by preserving the plan. on the existing conditions trees and rolling terrain typical of the area; planting new plan. trees along streets and pedestrian ways and choosing There are both a tree conservation easement Resolve the development species that reflect native forest elements; insuring that (ARB 2004-104) and a landscaping easement issues arising from the any grading will blend into the surrounding topography (ARB 2003-127) on the subject property (see easements on the subject thereby creating a continuous landscape; preserving, to the Attachments A), but these are not shown on property. extent practical, existing significant river and stream the existing conditions plan. The proposed valleys which may be located on the site and integrating development is not consistent with the Revise the plan to these features into the design of surrounding development; requirements of these easements. The provide landscaping to and limiting the building mass and height to a scale that landscape easement was an ARB compensate for removed does not overpower the natural settings of the site, or the requirement to mitigate the visual impacts of landscaping required to Entrance Corridor. the adjacent development to the east mitigate visual impacts of (SunTrust Bank). If that landscaping is the bank site. changed, new landscaping will be needed to meet current requirements of the hotel parcel and to mitigate visual impacts of the bank parcel. 39 The relationship of buildings and other structures to the The site is accessed from Richmond Road, Show existing trees on Entrance Corridor street and to other development within which has a sidewalk. The travelway and the existing conditions the corridor should be as follows: parking areas have an organized pattern. plan. Show trees to a. An organized pattern of roads, service lanes, bike paths, remain on the site plan. and pedestrian walks should guide the layout of the site. The proposed building is not situated parallel b. In general, buildings fronting the Entrance Corridor to the EC and it is set back approximately street should be parallel to the street. Building groupings 220'from the right-of-way. This deep setback should be arranged to parallel the Entrance Corridor street. is not consistent with adjacent properties. c. Provisions should be made for connections to adjacent However, the parcel has a very narrow pedestrian and vehicular circulation systems. frontage and an odd overall shape. These d. Open spaces should be tied into surrounding areas to factors limit options for developing the site provide continuity within the Entrance Corridor. with a single building. e. If significant natural features exist on the site (including creek valleys, steep slopes, significant trees or rock A pedestrian connection to Abbey Road is outcroppings), to the extent practical, then such natural proposed; however, a vehicular connection is features should be reflected in the site layout. If the not proposed. Due to the narrow width and provisions of Section 32.5.2.n of the Albemarle County odd overall shape of the subject property a Zoning Ordinance apply, then improvements required by vehicular connection to Abbey Road may not that section should be located so as to maximize the use of be feasible. existing features in screening such improvements from Entrance Corridor streets. Wooded area exists on site, but it is not f. The placement of structures on the site should respect shown on the existing conditions plan. existing views and vistas on and around the site. Site Grading 40 Site grading should maintain the basic relationship of the The proposed development relies on Identify the retaining wall site to surrounding conditions by limiting the use of significant grading and extensive use of heights on the south side retaining walls and by shaping the terrain through the use of retaining walls. Walls are terraced, but only of the hotel on the smooth, rounded land forms that blend with the existing minimally planted. Retaining wall heights grading plan. Provide terrain. Steep cut or fill sections are generally unacceptable. along the south side of the hotel are missing. complete information on Proposed contours on the grading plan shall be rounded with A wall is noted on the north side of the the wall on the north side a ten foot minimum radius where they meet the adjacent parcel, but information is incomplete. Wall of the parcel. condition. Final grading should achieve a natural, rather than heights will be needed to determine visibility engineered, appearance. Retaining walls 6 feet in height and from the EC and the extent of landscaping Indicate retaining wall taller, when necessary, shall be terraced and planted to blend that is needed. With retaining walls being material(s) and color(s) with the landscape. readily visible from the EC, identification of on the plan. A physical the proposed material(s) and color(s) of sample may be necessary retaining walls is necessary for review. Site for review. sections may be needed to clarify appearance and visibility. Enhance the planting of the terraced retaining walls. Provide site sections to clarify appearance and visibility of the hotel and retaining walls. 41 No grading, trenching, or tunneling should occur within the There are existing trees towards the rear of Show existing trees on drip line of any trees or other existing features designated the site, but no existing tree lines are shown the existing conditions for preservation in the final Certificate of Appropriateness. on the existing conditions plan or to be plan. Adequate tree protection fencing should be shown on, and preserved in the site plan. coordinated throughout, the grading, landscaping and Show areas designated erosion and sediment control plans. for preservation, if any, on the site plan. Maintain 42 Areas designated for preservation in the final Certificate of Appropriateness should be clearly delineated and grading outside the protected on the site prior to any grading activity on the driplines of trees to site. This protection should remain in place until remain. Show tree completion of the development of the site. protection fencing on, and coordinated throughout, 43 Preservation areas should be protected from storage or movement of heavy equipment within this area. the grading, landscaping, and erosion and sediment control plans. 20 Surface runoff structures and detention ponds should be The stormwater features are proposed None. designed to fit into the natural topography to avoid the need underground. for screening. When visible from the Entrance Corridor street, these features must be fully integrated into the landscape. They should not have the appearance of engineered features. 44 Natural drainage patterns (or to the extent required, new drainage patterns) should be incorporated into the finished site to the extent possible. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends the following as the primary points of discussion: 1. Orientation of the proposed building and distance from the Entrance Corridor. 2. The appearance of planting and retaining walls along the Entrance Corridor. 3. Interior parking lot trees. Staff recommends that the ARB forward the following recommendations to the Agent for the Site Review Committee: • Regarding requirements to satisfy the design guidelines as per § 18-30.6.4c(2), (3) and (5) and recommended conditions of initial plan approval: o Prior to Initial Plan approval the following items shall be resolved to the satisfaction of the ARB: ■ Resolve the development issues arising from the tree conservation and landscaping easements on the subject property. • Regarding recommendations on the plan as it relates to the guidelines: None. • Regarding conditions to be satisfied prior to issuance of a grading permit: 1. Maintain grading outside the driplines of trees to remain. Show tree protection fencing on, and coordinated throughout, the grading, landscaping, and erosion and sediment control plans. Regarding the final site plan submittal: A Certificate of Appropriateness is required prior to final site plan approval. The following items and all items on the ARB Final Site Plan Checklist must be addressed: 1. Show the location of mechanical equipment (building and ground mounted) on the site and architectural plans and show how it will be screened from the EC. 2. Provide a complete plant schedule with the next submittal. 3. Show how landscaping, retaining walls and signage will be coordinated at the street frontage and how an appropriate appearance for the EC will be achieved. Perspective renderings are recommended. 4. Provide large perimeter parking lot trees, 2%" caliper at planting, at 40' on center. 5. Add 6 interior parking lot trees on the landscaping plan. 6. Add the plant health note to the plan 7. Show the existing trees, tree conservation easement, and landscaping easement on the existing conditions plan. 8. Resolve the development issues arising from the easements on the subject property. 9. Revise the plan to provide landscaping to compensate for removed landscaping required to mitigate visual impacts of the bank site. 10. Show existing trees on the existing conditions plan. Show trees to remain on the site plan. 11. Identify the retaining wall heights on the south side of the hotel on the grading plan. Provide complete information on the wall on the north side of the parcel. 12. Indicate retaining wall material(s) and color(s) on the plan. A physical sample may be necessary for review. 13. Enhance the planting of the terraced retaining walls. 14. Provide site sections to clarify appearance and visibility of the hotel and retaining walls. 15. Show existing trees on the existing conditions plan. 16. Show areas designated for preservation, if any, on the site plan. Maintain grading outside the driplines of trees to remain. Show tree protection fencing on, and coordinated throughout, the grading, landscaping, and erosion and sediment control plans. This report is based on the following submittal items: Sheet # Drawing Name Drawin Date/Revision Date C1 Cover Sheet 11/25/2019 C2 Existing Conditions 11/25/2019 C3 Site Plan 11/25/2019 C4 Grading and Utility Plan 11/25/2019 C5 Landscaping Plan 11/25/2019 C6 Site Details 11/25/2019 10 ATTACHMENT A TH 78 PARCEL 13A / k"AEL SPOONER frn 78 BB 1376-679 Y¢nel ry CURRENT I15P VACANT ._ _ _ N'h{!B HOYSB Nnla! LdL DB -M 7B PARC[i. 13 sb' 1 DE 18TN-a43 NNI TES MIhETOS LB }965-784 r Ntl 515-+58 CURRENT USE: I �'3p�°gs� '1 Sonnd: MC--6C A:J'PMOTIVE SALES II Tree +� Conservation 1001 Area 'a R x v cIE r f is 6' Ame! 73A ''y t 1 .y s I w F'„m.e Home o ,�, ',4•. I�' Reu. wr Mw. F.me.�_.v. __._—__ _—__.._—._-- _..- R , (SP-Od-dBJ •. . / s ���� � - _ Rile } � .��,e.�_., 1 ' ��•-' �. �, m=' --111 `. _ iev �• -`r re�s+a+au a„=,6 _ p R ti .'r+ _ _ ox.ue wwrore 2Af6G 5PF. W. WE - 594.5 i ERE M• 1. �P1il'.4-_ - L,a- 4 w�� u H.4N.S4'N 41 _ . RD _ TM 78 PARCEL 73A 4 E �i HURT MVESTMENT COMPANY. J •'��1 ;y�l ce 1737-38 ;w CllRRENT USE- RETAIL '. �Ir NAL SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR RIVANNA ENGINEERING k OFFICE AT SOUTH PANTOPS SURVEYING, PI.C. RIVANNA DISTRICT. A1.PRMARI.F COUNTY. VIRGIN[A '%m ro.r urD �Itl1'�-��' w ffir.i Ir.+9 eea- Shee[ No: „ _� 0� SITEPLAN T_I -7 1 ry a1r1011f R. M71[R� "Office at South Pantops" final site plan showing tree conservation area and landscape easement on subject parcel. 11