Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWPO201400071 Correspondence Erosion Control Plan 2015-11-17John Anderson From: Glenn Brooks Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 8:18 AM To: David Brockman Cc: John Anderson; Todd Shifflett; Mark Graham; Doug Walker Subject: RE: Block 12 pond design Dave, This plan (WPO201500066) is approved. This plan serves as an alternative to the prior approved plan, WPO201400071. I believe that plan is bonded, and in that case can serve for this alternative also. Please let me know if I can do something further to help. Glenn Brooks, P.E. County Engineer VSMP Administrator Albemarle County From: David Brockman [mailto:dave@oldtrailvillage.com] Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 11:45 AM To: Glenn Brooks <GBROOKS@albemarle.org>; Mark Graham <mgraham@albemarle.org>; Doug Walker <dwaIker3@aIbemarle.org> Cc: John Anderson <janderson2@albemarle.org>; Todd Shifflett <tshifflett@albemarle.org> Subject: RE: Block 12 pond design Hi Glenn, Were you able to find the plans we submitted last week? Can we expect a response today? I greatly appreciate your attention. Regards, Dave Brockman From: Glenn Brooks[mailto:GBROOKSCabalbemarle.org] Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2015 3:29 PM To: David Brockman; Mark Graham; Doug Walker Cc: John Anderson; Todd Shifflett Subject: RE: Block 12 pond design I have not seen this submittal yet, but will look for it. From: David Brockman [mailto:daveCa@oldtrailvillage.com] Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2015 2:06 PM To: Mark Graham <mgraham albemarle.org>; Doug Walker <dwalker3@albemarle.org>; Glenn Brooks <GBROOKS@albemarle.org> Subject: Block 12 pond design Hi Mark, Doug & Glenn; On Tuesday we re -submitted the plan to Glenn Brooks for the block 12 pond. The revisions are a modification to our plan that reflect input from County Engineering, Stantec and RGA to achieve what we hope you will meet both the County's objectives and to keep us on track for the forthcoming master plan. This plan reflects: Back slope of dam reduced to 2.5:1 (very near the 3:1 Glenn Desired) • Inclusion of a Weir wall at the forebay instead of earthen dam. The added expense of this Weir wall helped lower the dam and permanent pool elevation (achieving Glenn's desires to lower the pond below Old Trail Drive). • We contained and passed the 100 year storm thru the pond riser and eliminate the need for a rip -rap or concrete emergency spillway providing more accurate measurement of flow (achieving one of Glenn's objectives to both move away and lower this spillway from Old Trail Drive). • Maintained 65% removal rate (which is in excess of the 50% normally required removal rate). • Incorporated appropriate 10/10 2/2 storm criteria (a change back to more reasonable criteria that should have been stated previously). This pond design has come at an incredible expense to Old Trail Village. It has lasted over 18 months; included a costly challenge from Engineering to our grandfathering rights that should never been an issue; significantly increased cost and delays to completing a storm water master plan; added cost for two engineering firms to complete the work of one; created tension from a changing design criteria through the submittal process; caused financial harm to our builders; and is frustrating our homeowner who are unable to move into their homes. I appreciate your effort to expedite the permit approval and bond posting as quickly as possible, so we can get back to developing the real estate. Regards, David Brockman