HomeMy WebLinkAboutZMA200200008 Review Comments 2002-12-11 pFAL
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Engineering&Public Works
MEMORANDUM
To: Yadira Amarante, Michael Barnes, Planning
From: Glenn E. Brooks, Engineering
Date of comment: 17 July 2002, Rev.1: 26 Aug 2002, Rev.2: 11 Oct 2002, Rev. 3: 11
Dec 2002
Date received: 8 July 2002, Rev.1: 13 Aug 2002, Rev.2: 4 Oct 2002, Rev.3: 26 Nov
2002
RE: South Pantops Office, rezoning, ZMA-2002-008
The Engineering Department will recommend approval when the following items have been
satisfactorily addressed: Comments in response to revisions are below in italics (Rev.1, Rev.2...).
1. It is unclear how fill will be placed without erosion control measures encroaching on
abutting property. Please provide a conceptual plan showing how this is to be
accomplished.
(Rev.1: More information is needed. Please refer to preliminary site plan comments.)
(Rev. 2:A conceptual plan has not been provided. In addition,proposed grading
information has been left off the revised plan, and more grading activity is taking place,
which makes the existing topography more inaccurate than before.)
(Rev. 3: The new conceptual plan shows grading very similar to the original submittal of
July 2002. A supplemental untitled sheet shows a concept where the adjacent property
would be filled to reduce the height of constructed slopes, and make the adjacent property
more conducive to site construction. Should the adjacent property provide an application,
or be included in this one, it could be reviewed, and may be workable. It raises concerns
for handling drainage. Pipes should not be buried too deeply, such that maintenance
cannot be performed without unreasonable site disturbance. Pertaining to the original
comment above, matters of adequate erosion control protection for downstream properties
have not been addressed.)
2. Please have the traffic study updated to indicate the levels of service at the intersections of
Hansen Road with the entrance and access road, and with Rt. 250. The need for turn lanes
into the site or the access road opposite should be analyzed. Please find attached the
applicable summary sheets from the traffic study of Apr 1998.
(Rev.]: Comment not addressed.)
(Rev.2: Comment not addressed. No traffic information has been received.)
V
,%
r „ .
•,
(Rev. 3: Traffic generation figures were provided on 23 Oct 2002, and comments were
v provided on 31 Oct 2002. These are included for reference. An updated traffic study has
not been provided.)
3. (Rev.2: The revised plan shows the drainage system has been connected to the Rt. 250
storm drain, which is not in keeping with the original PDMC zoning master plan. All
drainage was supposed to be directed to the stormwater management basin at the rear of
the Giant site.)
(Rev. 3:Drainage and stormsewer were not included on this revised conceptual plan, so it
could not be determined if this comments has been addressed.)
VDOT approval will also be required for plans which affect right-of-way. Please contact me if
you have questions.
Copy: file 1821
File:Pantops PDMC office zma(4).doc