Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZMA200100007 Special Exception 2019-12-23SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPLICATION DECEMBER 23, 2019 - RESUBMISSION NOVEMBER 04, 2019 STONEFIELD BLOCK D1 ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA OWNER'S AGENT O'CONNOR CAPITAL PARTNERS Mr. Brett Buehrer 535 Madison Avenue, 6th Floor New York, NY 10022 p. 212.308.7700 e. Bbuehrer@oconnorcp.com https://oconnorcp.com OWNER s OCT STONEFIELD PROPERTY OWNER LLC 240 Royal Palm Way, 2nd Floor Palm Beach, FL 33480 p. 212.546.0899 ARCHITECT / APPLICANT Mitchell/Matthews Architects P.O. Box 5603 Charlottesville, VA 22905 p. 434.979.7550 f. 434.979.5220 www.mitchellmatthews.com TABLE OF CONTENTS ORIGINAL WRITTEN REQUEST ii RESPONSES TO COUNTY RECOMMENDATION v VICINITY 02 EXISTING DEVELOPMENT SITE D1 PLAN 03 SITE PLAN - EXISTING 04 SITE PLAN - PROPOSED 05 CONTEXTUAL BUILDING STORY DIAGRAM 06 BUILDING STORIES STUDY 07 BUILDING STORIES C DISTRICT AVENUE 08 BOND ST & DISTRICT AVE PROPOSED 09 HYDRAULIC RD & DISTRICT AVE PROPOSED 10 INGLEWOOD DR & BOND ST PROPOSED 11 CALCULATIONS: CIVIC, GREEN, OPEN & RECREATIONAL SPACES 12 M I T C H E L L A R C H I T E C T S P i M xix November 4, 2019 Mr. David Benish Chief of Planning County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 M A T T H E W S P L A N N E R S RE: Stonefield - Block D1 - Application for Special Exception Request for a Variation to the Albemarle Place Code of Development for Additional Stories Albemarle County TMP 061 WO-03-00-019AO Dear David: This letter and attachments comprise our request for a Special Exception to allow additional stories, above the 5 stories permitted by right under the Albemarle Place Code of Development (COD) for Block D1 (20A.5.i.5, page 22). The maximum allowed building height of Block D is 90 feet and the proposed building will stay within this maximum height limit. Summary of Request The parcel's significant topographical slope is central to the request for additional allowed stories. The subject parcel grade drops 25 feet diagonally across the site. The proposed building will appear as six (6) stories above grade along three of its bounding streets --Hydraulic Road, Bond Street, and Inglewood Drive. Given the grade change, we are requesting permission to allow the project to be constructed as depicted in this application --up to six (6) stories above perceived grade on Hydraulic Road, Bond Street and Inglewood Drive; and up to eight (8) stories for a small portion of District Avenue. S P E C I A L EXCEPTION ALBEMARLE ORIGINAL WRITTEN REQUEST C O U N T Y T Ur J z m � O 0 O J WW LL CE: WQ Z> Ow m Q MITCHELL ■ MATTHEWS ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS i i CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 434.979.7550 2019.12.23 Justifications for Request * sheet numbers refer to accompanying graphics book Project Description [sheet 6] For several buildings adjacent to Block D1, County has approved Special Exceptions applications to build in excess of five (5) stories. Some of these have architectural elements that approach seven stories in height. a. Approved for (6) stories: the existing Hyatt Hotel, across Bond Street. b. Approved for (6) stories: the future Hyatt House, at the intersection of Bond Street and District Avenue. c. Approved for (6) stories: the future Christopher Cos. residential mixed -use building, at the intersection of Bond Street and Inglewood Drive 2. [sheet 7] The proposed building will be perceived as six (6) stories from the majority of vantage points around the building perimeter: along entire length of its two primary facades fronting Hydraulic Road and Bond Street; and also along Inglewood Drive. 3. [sheet 8] The cross slope on the parcel is approximately 25 feet --equivalent to two stories. It is reasonable to consider this condition when evaluating the actual versus perceived number of stories, as the building steps down the site. 4. [sheet 81 As the building steps down along District Avenue, a small portion exceeds seven (7) stories where the higher volume (shown in blue) overlaps the lower volume (shown in pink). This section is across from the service court access road to the Regal Cinemas with neither residences nor major public access points facing this side of the building. 5. [sheet 6] Code of Development allows buildings of greater stories in close proximity to the proposed project. A 90-foot, eight (8) story building height is allowed on the adjacent Block E. However, the anticipated greater height was not realized when Stonefield Commons (multifamily development) was built to only four (4) stories. 6. Allowing additional residential floors at Block D1 will provide housing options within walking distance to an array of commercial and retail venues. Appropriate building height and efficient residential development at this convenient location brings the most essential component of a viable mixed -use development: neighboring residents who can provide the vitality to Stonefield envisioned by the original Code of Development. Stonefield Block DI Special Exception Application Page 2 of 5 The applicant is pursuing approval of a Major Site Plan Amendment of Block D1 for a multifamily residential building at the southwestern corner of the Stonefield development. Notable adjacent buildings include the Hyatt Place Hotel and the Regal Stonefield Cinemas. [sheet 21 The proposed development offers 234 apartment units. One half of the proposed building surrounds an open courtyard. The other half encloses a multi -level parking structure with 440 parking spaces. [sheet 5] A portion of these spaces will serve employees and customers of the greater Stonefield development. A breezeway at District Avenue will provide direct pedestrian access to the commercial and retail venues beyond. Convenient covered scooter parking is located in this breezeway, adjacent to private bike storage and maintenance space available to residents. The ground floor main entry and flanking amenity spaces are designed to promote a vibrant streetscape. Functions at this street level include: Fitness Center, Cyber Cafe, Reception Area and Club/Game Area. Along these spaces, tall windows, at -grade entrances, and adjacent outdoor sitting areas are planned to encourage pedestrian interest and activity. Narrative on Consistency with 1 8-8.5.5.3(c)(1 -5) Ordinance Section 18-8.5.5.3(c) states: The director of planning is authorized to grant a variation upon a determination that the variation: (1) is consistent with the goals and objectives of the comprehensive plan; (2) does not increase the approved development density or intensity of development; (3) does not adversely affect the timing and phasing of development of any other development in the zoning district (4) does not require a special use permit and (5) is in general accord with the purpose and intent of the approved application. T Project Response: 1) The requested variation is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. a) Destination Center r Places29 Master Plan designates The Shops at Stonefield (formerly known as Albemarle Place) as one of O five Destination Centers. Destination Centers are of a "regional scale" as defined in the Plan. This J z proposed multi -family project will provide a portion of the residential component that is essential to m D achieving "the dynamic activity of the Center by increasing pedestrian activity on the streets." This type of O housing is appropriate for Destination Centers and is within safe and convenient walking distance to every 0 O amenity, restaurant, cafe, retail store and theater within the Stonefield development. The proposed J w project's larger building foot print and number of stories is also consistent with the residential building W _J characteristics envisioned within Destination Centers. LL CE: W Q Stonefield Block DI Z :�i Ow Special Exception Application ` rp Page 3 of 5 �r/� A Q S P E C I A L AEXCEPTIO LBEMARLE ORIGINAL WRITTEN REQUEST (CONT'D) C O U N T Y MITCHELL - MATTHEWS ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS i i i CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 434.979.7550 2019.12.23 b) Urban Mixed Use In essence, the proposed building is compatible with the approved Code of Development, with the sole The proposed project as a component of the greater Stonefield development is consistent with the intention and character of the Comprehensive Plan, the Neighborhood Model urban design standards and the original Stonefield Code of Development. This future building provides the vital residential density and complementary blend of uses needed to create a viable mixed -use community. As originally envisioned, this proposed residential addition will add to the array of housing offerings available at Stonefield that are within walking distance to retail, restaurant, recreational and employment opportunities. The requested variation does not increase the approved development density or intensity of development. The proposed building does not increase the approved residential development density. The proposed 234 units, added to the Block Group 1 " (Blocks A, B, C and D) existing and approved units, result in a total that is still below the density allowed by the Code of Development. Additionally, the proposed project replaces surface parking with an internal garage wrapped by the building and concealed from street view. A designated number of spaces are allocated for public use by customers and employees of the greater Stonefield development. The requested variation does not adversely affect the timing and phasing of development of any other development in the zoning district. The requested Special Exception does not affect the timing and/or phasing of any other development in the zoning district. The requested variation does not require a special use permit. The requested Special Exception does not require a special use permit. The requested variation is in general accord with the purpose and intent of the approved application. The proposed project is harmonious and consistent with the original and approved vision for the residential component of the mixed -use character of Stonefield. The proposed residential building assists the overall plan by fulfilling the fusion of complementary uses originally envisioned for Stonefield in an urban, walkable context with immediately adjacent access to retail, restaurant, recreational and employment opportunities. The COD stipulates several elements to be included within Block Group 1. The proposed building adheres to the elements that are applicable, such as conformance in size and location for the building, open space, street network, sidewalks, green space and hardscape area. Stonefield Block DI Special Exception Application Page 4 of 5 exception of the eight stories along a portion of District Avenue. The 25-foot drop across the site cannot be eliminated and undercuts the ability to minimize the number of stories while achieving the needed units. The perceived six (b) stories seen from the two primary streets --Hydraulic Road and Bond Street --and on Inglewood Drive, along with the massing, scale, and proportion of the proposed building are consistent with the context. This context includes the recently approved neighboring projects and with the existing Hyatt hotel directly opposite on Bond Street. In consideration of the facts, the existing site constraints and the justification presented above, we ask for approval to allow the project to be built as currently designed, with up to eight stories along a portion of District Avenue. We believe the justification to allow additional stories is reasonable and appropriate. However, if additional detail or further explanation of any aspect of this request would be helpful, we would be happy to provide it. Sincerely, John Matthews, AIA Mitchell Matthews Architects & Planners T Ur O� J z m � 0 0 0 J cc: BrettBuehrer, O'Connor Management, LLC W w LL rr WQ Stonefield Block DI Z :�i w Special Exception Application `0 rn Page 5 of 5 �r/� A Q S P E C I A L AEXCEPTIO LBEMARLE ORIGINAL WRITTEN REQUEST (CONT'D) C O U N T Y MITCHELL • MATTHEWS ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS IV CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 434.979.7550 2019.12.23 SPECIAL EXCEPTION ALBEMARLE COUNTY County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Alan Wong Mitchell Matthews Architects P.O. Box 5603 Charlottesville. VA 22905 RE: Special Exception Request: Block D-1 in Stonefield Mr. Wong, Staff has reviewed your resubmittal for a special exception request in Block D-1 of Stonefield. We have a few comments which we believe should be addressed before we can recommend favorably on your special exception request. We would be glad to meet with you to discuss these issues. Our comments are provided below: Planning (Tori Kanellopoulos) 1. Open space (referred to as green and civic space in Stonefield) is important to provide spaces of human -scale and to be consistent with Neighborhood Model Principles. It can be a mitigating factor for larger -scale buildings. Staff recommends revising the loading area shown in the front of the building, as this could function as open space instead. This could be a space with seating that provides useable open space for residents of this buildings and others in Stonefield. MM response: Refer to Table A on sheet 12 in this booklet. Proposed Green Space and Civic Space calculated for Block D-1 amply exceed the block target areas as described in the Albemarle Place Site Plan Green Space / Civic Space diagram (dated March 21, 2011, Rev. 1). Keeping the covered vehicle turn-off area will facilitate safer loading and unloading of passengers by keeping vehicles off Bond Street and potentially blocking traffic. This feature will be especially important car/ride sharing on the rise. 2. Provide a table with the total open and recreational space (square footage) provided with this development, and whether it is public or private. This should include at least the following: the courtyard area, the green area provided along the outside of the building, the indoor fitness area, and the rooftop amenities (if there are any). MM response: Refer to Tables 8 & C on sheet 12 in this booklet. - Table B shows that the proposed ratio of D-1 recreational area to D-1 total property area exceeds the approved ratio shown in the approved Albemarle Place documents, dated 3-21-2019, Rev. 1. This approved ratio related total Stonefield development recreational areas to the development's total area. - Table C shows that updated Stonefield development open space areas exceed areas shown in the approved Albemarle Place documents, dated 3-21-2019, Rev. 1. 3. Clarify if the first floor would meet standards for potential future commercial or office uses. While this proposal is not mixed -use, the intent of Stonefield was to provide spaces for a variety of uses, and it would be helpful to know the future potential uses of this building. MM response: Yes, modifications to the ground floor could be made in the future to accommodate commercial or office uses. Ground floor is at grade and no future accessibility issues are perceived. 4. The parking garage entrance/exit does not have a crosswalk and does not appear to provide safe pedestrian access, which is inconsistent with Neighborhood Model Principles. Three lanes, instead of two, also provides greater distance for pedestrians to cross. Consider revising to two lanes. A crosswalk (at minimum) will be required. MM response: Refer to sheet 05 in this booklet for updated site plan showing crosswalk for sah pedestrian access. The proposed three (3) lanes were further reviewed and approved by the Count. Engineer during an in -person meeting at County offices on December 6, 2019. 5. Include a rendering sheet that shows Inglewood Drive, to show the proposed streetscape on Inglewood and how this proposed building relates to the existing townhouses across the street. MM response: Refer to sheet 11 in this booklet for proposed streetscape on Inglewood. Note that the massing of the 6-story Christopher Cos. multi -family building is a general approximation only. Refer to Christopher Cos. documents for actual proposed building materials and color. 6. Confirm that the parking garage (structured parking) will be fully enclosed, so that no car headlights would shine into adjacent properties/buildings. MM response: Parking structure will be fully concealed from street view, aside from pedestrian breezeway on District Avenue and vehicular entrance on Inglewood Drive. This feature was also reviewed by County Engineer during an in -person meeting at County offices on December 6, 2019. 7. Provide more information on the rooftop amenities and uses. Impacts to the adjacent residentia units on Inglewood should be minimized. These would include lighting and noise. Staff alsc recognizes the benefits of providing these rooftop amenities for residents, especially as open space can be more urban in this type of development. MM response: Rooftop amenities are currently planned to include: pool/spa, pool deck lounging area; shaded terrace seating areas; grilling areas; and covered small -game area (e.g. ping-pong 8 foosball). Full cut-off luminaires will be selected to control light spillover onto adjacent properties, a: described in Section 4.17. The rooftop level will be well above the adjacent townhouses, minimizing the effect of unwanted noise and light. Moreover, building management will work to notify residents and enforce Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance Noise Regulations, as described in Section 4.18. 8. Please note that the Hydraulic Small Area Plan (Route29 Solutions, dated 04/03/18), contemplates a roundabout at Hydraulic Road and District Avenue. The exact location of the roundabout has not yet been determined, although the Plan shows a conceptual location. There is no requirement related to this application, and this is an advisory comment only. MM response: Advisory noted. Zoning (Rebecca Ragsdale) 1. The maximum height of the building must be limited to 90 feet. This includes any rool appurtenances, amenities, and/or equipment. MM response: Maximum height will be limited to 90 feet. ARB (Margaret Maliszewski) 1. The ARB will review the preliminary ARB submittal for this project during their December 16tr meeting. Review comments will be provided after that meeting. MM response: Review comments provided. Refer to response below. 2. While ARB approval is not required for the special exception request, it is required for site plan approval (Certificate of Appropriateness). Therefore, any relevant ARB comments on the preliminary ARB submittal should be considered relative to both the special exception. MM response: The ARB has no objection to the request for the Special Exception. The Boarc unanimously voted to forward this recommendation to the agent for the Site Review Committee. Fire/Rescue (Shawn Maddox) 1. The following comment is advisory only: Our main concern would be a least one contiguous side must provide unobstructed aerial fire apparatus access. This would be a minimum of 26' of travel width and no trees, or utilities, that would interfere with operations on that side. MM response: Advisory noted. Please let me know if you have any questions, or would like to meet, or need additional information. Best, Tori Kanellopoulos Planner Community Development 434-296-5832 ext. 3270 vkanellopoulos@albemarle.org * Mitchell/Matthews (MM) responses in RED. RESPONSES TO COUNTY RECOMMENDATION MITCHELL • MATTHEWS ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS V CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 434.979.7550 2019.12.23 .%{,y+ _. r , s it �� a �.�•� ±� t ` � � ;Y - it „ • i . • s GAO `♦ `'�. l Y • '� GO • O� HYATT PLACE k, • r _ - e - - _ -.�r, ,x`O� ' J ,� t r ,. _ s�~• N O R T H R O P J t GRUMMAN �o ,, r y� :• ;fi �.s` ; - J d r • ti .� � �1,.. ' ..� ` �' �\ �" "%�- `•yam - - �` ,> _ b, , . � E I• , Al OKI Am ci STONE11 FIELD ►.,li- SHOPPING, k ' CENTER, i, x :'• ;` SEMINOLE SQUARE REGAL STONEFIELD & IMAX �C SHOPPING CENTER ! fie OIL 1� 19F �•• �w �' �' 7' - y� ^. "s. + Y.. '�,i;-.7•,-lv .S �G%�%' yn _ `•C\ \ � _ O �:• -fir '�ygy� "+4.. �ti d��� - % t. ,'�{ � .�' / � "y♦Y "�� 1'I. !. � TRUE NORTH TRADER E t� r i {{ yy YVIP E a r S P E C I A L EXCEPTION ALBEMARLE C O U N T Y e AAAAAAAAAA --®AAAA ' AAAAAAAA AAA® `� '•,�,�■ P � � � � � �� .. I I I I 4 Dlluo� y §, §§ � � LuuJ III j r� I p p p p I FUTUREACCESS / RL II �� y I I Q I W —W- Q = Ll w Q o o I IIII I 1 _ T T i C1-II C211 � � I c _ — I FS OUTTAU A f f _ RESTAURANT, - �FUIMEACCES-S RETAIL OR �� - - - - FUEL FACILITY. ANqSAN FVTUREACCESS�r A-V A -IV L F— _J I � 4 ial —CHU 0HU c Cry-@ - - - � — - 11 - L I r- r -VI HIV Gi SS _ ' a - SUBJECT TO SITE PLAN _ .- — _ _ - « o �'� APPROVAL __ �U _ �W A - w El O B I 'P All A ! - 5 � 3 -- - - -- - - ' l' LW L - W- Jd, �1N �v --�: --- — , W - -, w - w <-- W - - W - -. W - w wo- P—� 'AS _ os >:I rea re*wx}_ rim 4W omri. —W tl✓--� tl0- its— o- -iN W — 7J �— VJ,. �C,151141=- I:Z■llj���!l N©. SHEET REVISION EXISTING DEVELOPMENT SITE Dl PLAN e — saw— w�AS., wAs wK s1 nescmeD Ur. PROJECT: ALBEMARLE PLACE TOWN CENTER SEi REv..NO. RU ALSO KNOW AS: STONEF/ELD 1 DRAWN 5Y ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VA REG owR er: TITLE: AMENDED APPLICATION PLAN -FULL BUILD DRAWING NUIVE! (;- 1 HFW EXHIBITA WWA NUMBER: FILE NAME: - , Da TE: SHEET NUMBER: 273042.11 304211C-ZMA XHBT2.dwgCIVIL �/ "" 10-21-2013 1 Of 1 T 0 Ur � 0 z m � O 13U WW L WQ Z 2 Ow -1 J Q MITCHELL - MATTHEWS O� ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 434.979.7550 2019.12.23 S P E C I A L EXCEPTION ALBEMARLE C O U N T Y EX 15' CENTRAL TELEPHONE - I / COMPANY ESMia EX i5' POWER I I PUBLIC EASEMENT DH 4282 P J43 I f I ESMT I O DP. J .B. 22a 1a5 I \ I D.BP 41991 I •.• f .`` Y L_LJl.1L.IV I D, B. ]41 P. 249 II '- + '+ • + + `+. - I - 21 INGR S/EGRESS / Cj1 I R 126.50' ' INGLEWGGD DRIVE EX 20' ACS4 D ER EA E.Ell- 135 BT 4391 PM 331 2 I 3 CL=11.41 . :. / ' WATER LINE_ _ L=11.41 _ L OHO: S 733'55 . " _ 8" DECIDUOUS W W w - W - W - - - - - _ - - - - - - , 3 / '+ - 6 DECIDUOUS TREE W w DROP INLEr -' W - W STOP I-'�-,}T- TREE W W YARD INLET GRATE W W =W w ly_ SIGN �W T �'EY d" SAN I / W 6' DECIDUOUS GRATE W - 1J -�- - /4. TREE TOP 50560 �Op=505.3] DROP 11RdE� � SAN SAN - TOP-50028 ) /' BM PK NAIL \. NO LEFT W - =W 6" DECIDUOUS N80-21'ISE TURN SIGN RAILING 0844 # LP 1 7 9 BM PK NAL vy W I lIVCj W I SPEED LIMY b" ° m ' E4/0M 5 slcN 6 DECIDUOUS + + IF THIS DRAWING IS A REDUCTION D(Z� OD �- D�GUs DEaDLou / /. TREE �PE£D LI IT - TREE GRAPHIC SCALE MUST BE USED cGMCasr 6" oEClDu�oEuf ausH < 25 SIGN ° SCALE: 1 s 20' 3 4 WALLI N8P21'13"E I / JUNCTION' / SIGN / INV=521, 4 . DRAIN IPE 13.50' / 4" WALL R A 023'21 4l" INV-5�9.]9 / DRAIN PIPE / BOX 4" pECf000U5 e S3T06'30"W BLOCK 6" D CIDUOUS DECIDUOUS 25.95' °` RETANING R 20350 INV==504.32 TREE TREE .' TREE 20' 0 20' WALL CL 82.41 / ' yWALL + <a ° - DECIDUOUS 2 L B298' DRAIN PIPE DECIDUOUS / DECIDUOUS EX GASLWE EASEMENT �. LP s 3 TREE e" �� CHD=523.40 06 w/ INV=�506.20 / TREE G� TREE D.B. 4186 P. 321 f DECIDUOUSTREE 8 TDEGIEDliOUS /. I # 1 d 022'07'39" 4" WALL r I -L I48.93' DRAIN PIPE 8" / WATER LINE I O L 99.24' INV�11.68 DECIDUOUS / / / \.-. eJ CHD=N26'02'41 "E TREE 6" J / + Cul I U O . 4 WALL # / OECIOUTREE / / i OECIbUOUS 3 6^ DRAIN PIPE / / P# / LP RT£ / DECIDUOUS°a CLI Q V 6 INV=513.64 4=008D9'46" # TREE 23' INGRESS EGRESS- R-2-DO: 3 // EASEMENT qq pp I CL 28.68/ / / Les]i D.B. 4135 P. 249-I GI F GHD N16'04'D5"E J ( / f3 _ / V / . DECIDUOUS 3 C N / DECIDUOUS / 6" TREE / / REE OElIGUOUS / / TREE UOUS / TREE DECIDUOUS I . ' 3 TREE II ['• N '6 L I DECIDUOUS 6" /( 8^ 6.. I / ,n LP C DECID OUS TREE / DECIDUOUS p� a S # I C p q I TREE / TREE/ /CID TREE DECID TREEI �jl W DEEIDUDUr f /,/ 1 / I °• 3 TREEI lklk / DECIDUOUS I / -I // I/ II // 1� II RIGHT TORN f , - - GO H YAT T oNL- SIGN / /j{��/�'�.�ry„] v I EX VARIABLE WIDTH 187 D. p I POWER ESMT I BUSH D.B. 416E P, 199 e � 6" 6" II /8' DIA' / DECIDUOUS / gEDID0REE 1 DECIDUOUS 6" Bus TREE TREE DECIDV US \ I I TREE I DECID OUS 9 / BLOCKD-1 TREEy TREE 6" 6" LP 1 I _ OECIDUOf/8' DECIDUOUS / / 6 US / # 3 ',TREE / TREE DECIDUOUS DECIDUOUS Q % / TREE I TREE `I SIG /i VAULT °• . EE II e' GI . BUSH LP / ^ II I "CIDUOUS I % / / 62 1 LI - o£a uous I `• I I j % j y j � o -_P# = REE 6 DROP INLET INV-ER94.61 I I NtELGS VAULT / TOP=494.8] �•' S I • T I I I / / / / , HANDICAP PARKING /'I-� SIGN 8' CIA / DECIOWEE pgRKINGDSIGN ry N 3 DECI UOUS r I 8. / 6. / / 6., i us I I� BUS�1I DECIDUOUS I DECIDUOUS DECIDUOUS ICAP TREE D REE TREE TREEI v / O SIGHT DISTANCE ' DROP INLET M�sCEL(ANEOU / SOIL DIVISION 0 E 63 EASEMENT l ToP=a9a.s5 t;2 I I sk'N + a SOIL TESEE SO(TYPIOCAA� ___-SOIL 64 O/. 4135 P 249 lgz, II \ DECID us THIS SHEET. DR wLET _ DRDP wLEr w RIGHT TURN \ \ TR \ /-501.45 p - - - - ' DECIDUOUSTREE ONLY SIGN 1 / STOP ELECTRICAL O + I a I DEC', ` ( I ' - - - SIGN- - _ - _ _ _ I _ JUNCTION BOX. sr0 - I • STONE \ TR 1 G11'40'2J" 0 { WAL PCREOSSR1NB� 5 ]]' c i• SIGN \ g DROP INLET Tp CL=52.83' AHEAli51ON 4 • �. -I - -J - l - - 1 3 TOP=514.83 L=52.98' •LP#•• I p GRDSS, • • LP _ I - LEGEND POST '�I 67T �� = • • \ `l�H�®• 46.5 SIDEWALK RIGHT S09'38'30"E ZIC fANOCARED DRDP INLET MAINTENENCE 8" PARKING 46.4 3' DIA. 3 13.18' 43.5 =SOIL BOUNDARY LP GRATE EASEMENT pECID0008 BUSH N41.00'51 E_ AREA RAN 0371� TOP=5G0.46 D.B. 4135 TREE SIGN 21B 1 II 8.36' _ \ �.. 8" P. 249 DECIDuous DRY uous DISTRICT AVE. g" 3 - _ DROP wLEr 88 - UDORTHENTS, LOAMY, DROP INLET TREE 1 DECIDUOUS US DECIDUOUS 46,6 GRATE I TREE TRAFFIC TOP=505.43 _ TREE GRATE + 2 TO 25 PERCENT SLOPES Ns.> 11 112'E 'ANT ! / 46.7 8 _ TOP=a9ass HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP (NO RATING) 26_n' POL DECIDUOUS - _ K FACTOR, WHOLE SOIL RATING (NO RATING) 3 TREE - ' VARIABLE WIDTH 8^ '® �� I K FACTOR, ROCK FREE RATING .24 I DECIDUOUS ' � INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT i 8" D.B. 4135 P 249 �I I I TREE DECIDUOUS / II -"' 3 27C EUOAK LOAM. SLOPES EX 12' SIGHT DISTANCE EASEMENT 7 TO 15 3 all; ELD J / I _ T FEE 1 TREE / - W- w -WATER LINE W D. W 4135 W 249 w W- I I W W _L - HYDROLOGIC R SOIL B MARouI SIGN / R=941iG9 25 VA _ SIP WALK W t w -- w w w _ W K FACTOR, WHOLE SOIL RATING .28 W II '�I JUNCTON I CL. 14.09' MAINTENENCE W EASEMENT K FACTOR, ROCK FREE RATING .28 GHD= 36'0]'45"E D.B. 4135 P. 249 34D - GLENELG LOAM. _ 15 TO 25 PERCENT SLOPES • ° • . T • ._ HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP B D III _ - ° a� w w _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ° K FACTOR, WHOLE SOIL RATING .24 7: -`--- _ K FACTOR, ROCK FREE RATING .24 i F I - - O/ DESIGNEJDBBY, PROJECT. STONEFIELD BLOCK D-1 SET REV. NO. \t\:ca / V'>WA INITIAL SITE PLAN - ENGINEERS pRAWN BY o ! SURVEYORS ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA DRAWING NUMBER: J 'OHN DAVID BERiNE JR <. Nu. 042267 ., LSSOCIATES PLANNERS A KIN DIHR a TITLE; EXISTING CONDITIONS C-6 Ham' WWA NUMBER: FILE NAME: DISCIPLINE: SCALE: DATE: SHEET NUMBER: I 219040.02 904002C_EX-Ldwg CIVIL H: f'=20' 1 0/17/19 6 Of 1 1 NO. SHEET REVISION BY DATE NO. SHEET REVISION BY DATE - �' . V: N A SITE PLAN - EXISTING MITCHELL • MATTHEWS ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS CHARLOTTESViLLE, VA 434.979.7550 T 0 r Uo� z M W D O l3U WW L WQ Z 2 Ow -1 Q 04 2019.12.23 S P E C I A L EXCEPTION ALBEMARLE C O U N T Y ,-12'X6' TAPPING erg a�a e� � ,I���'� I��p�_,116■ � i► �� � ;, N O I;t T H .. '----„---,-__— c ��iidlli9 !•➢}' jam, r- ... .— ,,.I !� - ;�! � I :.�o ® �i�l�® !•! {i if<! isrs_.v±.mow �'A� dl�®� =!�ii 110. AWmClair . v gIR IIIII ' llama! -� - -� � � � �'��I�a.my • �� ... .•. -„ ��o ■ �Ilum'_ a � � are �� I Rig, 159 � ► II®e • IL ����AW r a.- �pp���� II hL1J� RI h I DUWN H." PLACE �i - = .. ►�►� ►� . BLOCK D-3 ullIP. ► 'f►►►�►�i%1, �'�j'f►tl►.►f'1HYATT i.l►� �.►ten. ��►HYATT PLACE HOTEL 6 STORIES Div `• � -_� ►� t'►>'•' ;� �i�.►�►•• ►' ���_, �►►.mil. ,Ic �,1�'• ►►� ►.1`„"f,� N .a n Ii �R�•- �i,r�iTi� ONLY SIGNIN ECI v DROP INLET I� TRAEFlC PEDESTRIa — AHEAD SIGN/ o- - . _ ' 6 3.. slcN •., TIE] ROOF _ Y — I r x. - — — - TOP=514.83 D caosswaLX/ _ _ • A • LP DD • PIP y P / DRAIN LEADER _ — sr a- /• LPa a TO EXISTING - I �I 1 RAfEic /❑ s°u" y �° 46.5 �TDa=Sa STORM SEWER -.... j- 1 3 IDECIDUOUS •a. LT • / LANDCAPED • �- AREA _ — -/LP - a —I �102' DROP INLET TOPT 500.46 a• DECIDUOUS 46 4 3 43.5 O — i a" DDEECI UOUS DISTRICT TREE _�- - CONNECT TO IXISTING z DROP INLET occlDuous - TREE AVE. 6" DECIDUOUS US DECIDUOUS DROP INLET NANDI PED RAMP I I GRATE TOP=505.43 TREE TREE (LINE ND ON GRADE M ucrlr/ PO I 46.7 8•, _ TOP =494Az5 ! ! ! DECIDUOUS TREE ' II O OI I DECIDUOUS I TREE_ DECIDUOUS EX 12" / l s TREE WATER LINE I I3 srD M EEIELD % I IUIS / Sr / IAULi / w—w w—w—w—w W T W—w—w—W— w. w— w w�wtw—w w w_� w W W I D JIilNCT10N ell - W f ___ W Q 1 REVISED BUILDING FOOTPRINT JDB 12/19/19 'CIf or, PROJECT: STONEFIELD BLOCK D-1 SET REV 1. WADESIBNEJDBB: INITIAL SITE PLAN -NO. Z ENGmEERs SMWYORS gffl DRAWN XTMB�. ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA DRAWING NUMBER: W O 7OHN DAVIDBEDLNE I Lk. Nu. 042267 PLANNERS /` AS30CIATES D"R sY. TITLE SITE LAYOUT PLAN C-8 [Q HFW SHEET NUMBER: W //� WWA NUMBER: FILE NAME: DISCIPLINE: SCALE: H: 1--20° DATE: N,;, SHEET REVISION BY DATE NO. SHEET REVISIO BY DATE r 219040.02 904002C_SP—i_REVISED �TPRINT.dwg V. NIA 1O/17/19 8 Of l I V SITE PLAN - PROPOSED MITCHELL • MATTHEWS O� ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 434.979.7550 2019.12.23 L _ - _ - fo I 5 5 I TT rlK H e. I 7 �I s� ,i - - n M� ■■ � I I I Rh OIII11 . 1 _ � �.�� ALL;• ,�,.� � i 41 SEEMS ■■■ ■ I I STRY -o-o 0 I 7j, STRY - -�_ -- - • ��— — —� � w =,� -- w a,iy�VVVVIIV 11 _ o = - w I� r� °. FUTUREACC655�r +i 01Hu �_j w SN iW N ,rt AN - I` s � - -w- — W W a W w STORIES ALLOWED BY CODE OF DEVELOPMENT IA- c l 90TALL / 5 STORIES 90' TALL / 8 STORIES SPECIAL E►XC-EPTION ALLOWED BLOCK D1 I n F5 OUTPARCEL. u RESTAURANT, i } RETAIL OR FU 1JRE ACCESS 11 FUEL FACILITY. i ox�xu IZA G�y� 1 SUBJECT TO SITE PLAN I APPROVAL G3 - CHU w w - NI — W r s 'W I^.; nrscmeD 51 PROJECT: ALBEMARLE PLACE TOWN CENTER SET REv. NO. RU ALSO KNOWAS: STONEFIELD 1 DRAWN BY ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VA REG TITLE: DRAWING NUIJE! er: AMENDED APPLICATION PLAN -FULL BUILD (;— 1 HFW EXHIBIT A SHEET NUMBEP: 213042.11 304211C—ZMA XHBT2.dwgCIVIL � —100' 10-21-2013 1 Of 1 SPECIAL EXCEPTION ALBEMARLE CONTEXTUAL BUILDING STORY DIAGRAM COUNTY T Q U} � 0 z c O 0 U WW L W Q Z 2 Ow m /J c/w. Q MITCHELL • MATTHEWS O� ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 434.979.7550 2019.12.23 I :: -C11� I�II� a■ :: u�6���� ■� imimmiii 1i.1�::- 0l: I I I 1 I_� :�■_ EMEM I�111�,��.■ ::-'ri.i.�., ::- M III -------------------------------- E BLDG OVERLAP AT SLOPING GRADE (@ District Avenue) SPECIAL EXCEPTION ALBEMARLE COUNTY n rc—)Arl ROOF APPURTENANCE BUILDING STORIES @su DISTRICT AVENUE T Q 0 U �- O J z Co O o U J Ww LL rr WQ Z� Ow m Cl) Q MITCHELL • MATTHEWS ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 434.979.7550 2019.12.23 STORIES 1��•'� � C I A L °PTION RnND ST & r E r L a M.. .. - - - . ,• , hem. ` f • � a y. m _ 1000 6� � � I l�15i6 i�[+ .� �.d+e• y r � r'Y Y �i a� "'rt ,�/y }��'�„� 0�4 ��. � i �4� .fir rs�i �'y1'i' ,4. � x. i�' ' •(°J k. r e� A` F �� ••tea MOM NIL AV Y �. 111 a ■r� { r '# - idr n✓"'4 �s.i`�1# dr. R i}� .*. " ��7 .� ...�'-' r. ,.l i 'ice ra -a,r, t,.. 4 "f _ _ � -y.,• a i$ �a -..., 7 , r _ _ y a �i'. ���• � _ - � �. �.. Y ' Sr � " .A Z Ry Tr F•� i 4 a , • rr { d � "v 9 . }• J,'?. .,�,.rCrti SY � '� .�'. ^F'':'g'.11 cry: T i' -l� 'r)r .. � .�.•. 4 P s.• x - .1 rr is .t" ,t, Y +I � .:T 1 � " � �J� a} r ' v a ,tk':k , •,xr t . C�r,S ,;.. 6 � �n,+:V ` 'may �. 'T '�' ,j4. •J i•::, -a � I e �:, .d.•. .� '�' �. c�:4. y'k..�t„r y-•- '�fi NZ • I 41 �' � _ilk. ",yu �3aT' -+•� .�..ww4S" 'F. i .,�F � .f..r�� J +�4 �" I•! Y � Il: /_111 I [y :1 DIF:'f 11 " 0:1 [N /aVl :8Jmole] Y0I.`l7! ri I Aid M di Wi mmmm 444 mill A4W 41A W4, lift ohm, I 916191101 On to] L 1013 9 N an[*] a S P E C I A L EXCEPTION ALBEMARLE C O U N T Y l IIIII 1 TABLE A: BLOCK D4 OPEN SPACE AREAS AnT-M CT H♦--M�------_ Q PI _HYDRAULIC ROAD BLOCK D-1 GREEN SPACE TEM PROPOSED AREAS (SF) 'APPROVED AREAS (SF) BEEN SPACE +l- 22.867 +l- 18,111 IVIC SPACE +l- 16,919 +l- 71,843 PEN SPACE - GREEN +Civic +1- 39,786 +1. 29,964 �IMMARI: PROPOSED GREEN AND CIVIC SPACEAREAS EXCEEDAPPROVED AREAS. TABLE B: RECREATIONAL SPACE IRS) RATIOS ITEM PROPOSED AREAS (BF) BLOCK RI: RECREATIONAL SPACE (PUBLIC + PRIVATE) +l- 5,358 PUBLIC +1- 0 PRIVATE N- 5,3SB PROPOSED RS RATIO OF BLOCK 0.1 AREA (AREA 1108,029 SF BLOCK D-1 AREA) +I- 4.96% TARGET RS RATIO OF AGGREGATE RS OVER TOTAL DEVELOPMENT' +I- 1.67% SUMMARY: PROPOSED RATIO OF RECREATIONAL TO PROPERTY AREA EXCEEDS APPROVED RATIO FOR OVERALL STONEFIELD DEVELOPMENT, TABLE C: STONEFIELD DEVELOPMENT OPEN SPACE AREAS ITEM PROPOSED AREAS (AC) I ''APPROVED AREAS (AC) GREEN SPACE +/- fi.54 +1- 643 % THE TOTAL SITE (AREA 143.29 AC) ♦1. 16.11% +/. 14.85% GREEN SPACE NOTES: -THE OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT IN CODE 18.4.7 WAS WAIVED AND REPLACED AS I SPECIFIED N THE CODE OF DEVELOPMENT. -DOES NOT NCLUDE TREE PITS WHICH ARE INCLUDED IN CIVIC SPACE. CIVIC SPACE +1 6.12 *I- 5.00 % THE TOTAL SITE (AREA 143.29 AC) +l- 11.63% +l- 11.65% CIVIC SPACE NOTES: -THE OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT IN CODE 18.4.7 WAS WAIVED AND REPLACED AS SPECIFIED IN THE CODE OF DEVELOPMENT. -CIVIC SPACE AND GREEN SPACE AREAS OVERLAP AS INDEPENDENT ENTITIES. NOTES FOR TABLES A, B, C • ' AS DOCUMENTED IN APPROVED ALBEMARLE PLACE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN GREEN AND CIVIC SPACE- ULTIMATE PLAN, DATED 3-21-2011, REV. i • ° ALL PROPOSED AREAS SHOWN ARE PROVIDED FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPLICATION; AREAS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE. • ° AS DOCUMENTED IN APPROVED ALBEMARLE PLACE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN, ULTIMATE PLAN, DATED 3.21-2011, REV. 1. �I • I' `9 ■ I II • ' 1 BOND ST. 4 ❑ o, _ 0 --arc/w HYDRAULIC ROAD BLOCK D-1 CIVIC SPACE LEGEND LEGEND I� PUBLIC AREA r-1 PUBLIC AREA PRIVATE AREA PRIVATE AREA — DESIGNED BY JOB PROJECT: STONEFIELD BLOCK D-1 SET REV. NO. _ GNCBNEERS DRAWN By. ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA ����/j�//�►��SCRVEYOBS m% JDB DRAWING NUMBER: PLANNERS ASSOCIATES DMR BY: HFw TITLE: GREEN SPACE/OPEN SPACE EXHIBIT EXH-1 WWA NUMBER: FILE NAME: DISCIPLINE: SCALE: DATE: SHEET NUMBER: NO. SHEET REVISION BY DATE TVO: SHEET REVISION BY DATE •_� 219040.03 90400JC_EXH—i.dwy CML H:1%rJ0' V. NIA 12/18/19 1 Of 1 PEN CALCULATIONS.CIVIC, GREEN, & ECREATIONALOSPACES T 0 Ur O ~ -I z m� O 0 O J W LL rr W`a ZC OW m Q MITCHELL • MATTHEWS 12 ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 434.979.7550 2019.12.23