HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUB201900120 Review Comments Easement Plat 2019-09-27Engiiiecring • Surveyrlrg • Planning
September 27.2019
RE: Stonetleld-SUB201900120
Belovy are continents in response to the revision letter dated August 5_ 2019.
Planning (Tori Kanellopoulos):
1. General Comments:
MERIDIAN
440 Yromci Circle, times 200
CharloIt- NdIc, A A '2901
Phone:44,SSJ ()I )I
u ww-nwf idion%dw.mm
a. Please note that all new easements shown on the site plan SDP2019-12 must be approved and
recorded with an easement plat before the site plan can be approved. Staff has reviewed both
the site plan and this easement plat, and it appears all proposed/adjusted easements are shown.
i. An easement may be needed for the proposed stairs that are partially off -site. Staff will
follow up with a determination.
b. This should be processed as a Boundary Line Adjustment, not as a vacation plat. Please remove
all references to 'vacating'. Lots 22-61 and Lots 90-104 and the Area shown (that is, part of TMP
61W-3-D2-A) should be added to and combined with one of the existing lots. Such as:
i. "TMP 61W-3-D2 lots 23-61 and lots 90-104, and the Area [label more specifically, see
below] shown, are added to and combined with TMP 61W-3-D2 lot 22."
Response: Comment has been reflected on plat.
ii. The area shown should not be labeled 'open space', as that is a specific term and this is
not required open space. Label instead could be "Portion of TMP 61W-3-D2A", for
example. Response: Comment has been reflected on plat.
iii. The symbol for combining parcels (land hook) should be used for each parcel to show
that a Boundary Line Adjustment is being processed. Response: Comment has been
reflected on plat.
iv. Therefore, the final TMP could be: Revised TMP 61W-3-D2-22. Response: Comment has
been reflected on plat.
c. [14-302(A)(3)] Streets and ROW. Include the ROW for all streets shown and include DB/PG if
applicable. Response: Comment has been reflected on plat.
d. Remove references to 'vacated' easements —they should be 'abandoned'. Response:
References to "vacated" have been removed
2. Sheet 1:
a. [14-302(A)(1)] Title. Revise project title to the following: "Boundary Line Adjustment and
Easement Plat for Stonefield — Block D2, Phase 2." Response: Comment has been reflected on
plat.
b. [14-302(B)(5)] Zoning. Include a note on the plat that the parcels contain proffers: "The subject
properties contain proffers per ZMA200100007, ZMA201100004, ZMA201100007, and
ZMA201300009". Response: Comment has been reflected on plat.
c. [14-302(B)(5)] Zoning. Include the following zoning overlays in the Notes: Entrance Corridor and
Airport Impact Area. Response: Comment has been reflected on plat.
d. [14-302(A)(9)] Building site. Add the required building site note: "Revised Tax Map Parcel [insert
number here, based on number chosen based on BLA comment] and Revised Tax Map Parcel
61W-3-D2-A each contain a building site that complies with section 4.2.1 of the Albemarle
County Zoning Ordinance." Response: Comment has been reflected on plat.
e. [14-302(A)(11)] Parcels and owners. Include the owner and title information fort he other
parcels as well in the Notes (22-61 and 90-104, which have the same owner, as listed in the
second Statement of Consent). Response: Comment has been reflected on plat.
3. Sheet 2:
a. [14-303(D)] Acreage. The acreage tabulation should be revised to be clearer. Please revise to
show the portion of TMP 61W-3-D2-A and the acreage of the lots being added to and combined
with TMP 61W-3-D2-22 (for example) and the acreage of revised TMP 61W-3-D2-22. There
should not be references to common or open space. Response: Comment has been reflected
on plat.
4. Sheet 3:
a. [14-302(A)(4)] Easements. Remove reference to 'vacated'— should be 'abandoned' easements.
Also, it appears some of the easement is hatched, however some is not. Please clarify if more
area should be hatched. Response: Comment has been reflected on plat.
S. Sheet 4:
a. [14-302(A)(4)] Easements. Remove reference to 'vacated'— should be 'abandoned' easements.
Also, label if the drainage easements are public or private. Response: Comment has been
reflected on plat.
6. Sheet 5:
a. [14-317] Easements and maintenance. Include documentation to show who will maintain the
proposed private access easement. This may be accomplished by updating the existing
documents for this area of Stonefield as well.
b. [14-302(A)(4)] Easement dimensions. Some dimensions for the proposed easement in the S/W
corner of the lot appear to be missing. Please include. Response: Missing dimensions have been
added.
7. Sheet 6:
a. [14-302(A)(4)] Easements. The drainage easement along Houston Street is labeled as hatched
area being abandoned, however no hatched area is shown. Please clarify if this easement is
affected by this plat. Response: Incorrect label has been removed.
ACSA (Richard Nelson):
1. Adjust ACSA easements to reflect construction drawing comments. Response: Easements have been
revised to match the construction documents.
Engineering (John Anderson)
1. Include filterra easements with the resubmission to meet SWM requirements prior to VSMP approval.
Response: Filterra easements have been added.
Please contact Tori Kanellopoulos in the Planning Division at vk<: nelloprid( >f,a)aihernar1e org or 434-296-5832
ext. 3270 for further information.
BeloNN are comments iu response to the revision letter dated .August 25, 2019.
P1
I Recommend vicinity map identify additional roads /streets, relatively fewer subdivision neighborhoods, and that
vicinity map outline the parcel. Recommend against Google Map pin. Response: Comment has been
reflected on plat.
2. Recommend title include reference to I,crselneivl.s since easements are created and vacated with this plat, and
comprise most graphic information. Title should include ref. to boundary line adjustment, since Ex. lots are
vacated. P2 Response: The plat title has been revised.
3 Sheet indicates Open Space will remain. Label 01)err,S/wce to remaih (label area to remain).
Response: References to Open Space have been removed per Planning comments.
4. Provide exterior boundary bearing -distance data if P5 does not provide sufficient exterior boundary information
to tie segments L2, L8 and curve C3 to parcel boundaries. Engineering requests boundary bearing -distance be
shown on sheet P2 to extent required to define ties that identify portions of open space to remain.
Response: Additional boundary information has been provided. Open space references have been
removed.
5. Area summary for 'TMP 61W-3-D2' may be a typo since cannot locate this parcel in GIS. GIS identifies TMP 61W-
3-D2 2arcel A. Provide TMP 61W-3-D2 label on graphic plat, if accurate. Note: Listed 2.84 Ac. is consistent with
GIS Real Estate records for D2 2arcel A. Response: The information has been corrected.
Confirm area partially bounded by L8 is Open Space, to remain. Clarify with label. Response: References to
Open Space have been removed per Planning comments.
Provide segment - curve endpoints (see P5 /example). Response: Segment and curve endpoint markers
have been provided.
x. Provide L5 - C2 tie. Response: Tie lines have been provided.
Recommend label Access Easement to remain. Response: Label has been added.
Engineering Review Comments
Page 2 of 3
P3
10. See item 6, above. Confirm area partially bounded by L19 is Open Space, to remain. If not, revise P2 and P3 for
clarity. Label open space to remain, or access easement to remain, or, if both, labels that identify precisely what
areas are, which remain. Response: References to Open Space have been removed per Planning
comments.
1 1. Provide L17 - L18 (shared) endpoint. Response: Segment and curve endpoint markers have been
provided.
12. Provide segment - curve endpoints, generally. See sheet P5. Response: Segment and curve endpoint
markers have been provided.
I 2.665 Ac. label for parcel is inconsistent with County GIS, which lists 61W-3-D2-A =2.84 Ac. Response: Area
tabulations have been revised.
14. Provide Houston Street, Inglewood Drive, and Bond Street deed bk.-
pg. references for public drainage easements. Response: Deed Book and Page have been provider to sheet P6 bk.pg, ref.
15, Reposition /center Inglewood Drive label. Comment applies to P5, as well. Response: Text position has been
adjusted.
1 r. Label Access rosement to remain. Response: labels have been revised.
17 Recommend label Open Space to remain, if distinct from Access Easement.
Response: References to Open Space have been removed per Planning comments.
18. Item 4, above, applies to easement segments - curves on this sheet, as well.
Response: Additional easement information has been provided.
P4
19. 88.49' ACSA variable width easement to remain has no ties. Items 4 and 18, above, apply to ACSA easement
segments, as well. Response: Additional tie information has been provided.
20. Item 18 applies to second remnant ACSA easement, as well. Provide bearing -distance data sufficient to tie ACSA
linework for portions of Ex. ACSA easements that remain.
Response: Additional easement information has been provided.
21. Recommend label Ex. ACSA easement /Ex. storm drain easement to remain.
Response: Labels have been revised.
P5
22. Cannot locate segments L115, L116; please direct reviewer to these two segments.
Response: Labels are located to the left of Detail #1 on the center amenity island
23. C59 does not match sheet P3, C6. Plat detail at this location appears inconsistent, or partial.
Response: Cs9 is the extent of the new access easement, C6 is the vacated portion of the existing,
these do not tie in the same location.
24. New Property Line label is confusing since it appears identical with sheet P2, which appears to show existing
property lines. Review /revise as needed. Response: Labels have been revised.
25. Curved portion of Access Easement to remain south of L151 does not match sheet P3, C4. Revise as needed.
Until P5 provides consistent match with P3, C4, plat lacks frame of reference for L151, C63, etc.
26. Items 4, 18, 19 apply to New Access Easement. In particular, provide ties for C29, C58, and C59.
Response: Additional easement information has been provided.
27. Provide inset details for L106 and L117 since L106 =0.19' and L117 bearing is not identical with 209.19' boundary
bearing. Response: Insets have been provided.
28. Reposition /center Inglewood Drive label. Response: Labels have been revised.
P6
29. Label new private drainage easement (bounded by L23, L24, L25) width. Recommend label this as Neil
10' jrivu1e thVi17crge easenae 71. Response: Labels have been revised.
30. Label easement bounded by L26, 27 Neil- I%ari(rh/e Wi4ph Przvnte Drcrijauge Easernenl. Response: Labels have
been revised.
31. Provide SWM Facility and SWM Facility Access Easements dedicated to public use (5 Filterra units). Response:
Access easement have been provided.
32. Ensure SWM Facility easement consistent with Filterra unit size /location. (WP0201.400096 Amendment) Response:
Easements have been provided to cover the size of the filterra unit.
;. Provide sufficient boundary /Ex. easement bearing -distance data to eliminate guesswork. That is, furnish (bk.-pg.
940-212) Ex. drainage easement bearing -distance data to make linework readily understandable. Plat at bk.-pg.
940-212 must be reviewed to establish proposed new 10' private drainage easement. This information does not
exist with the current proposed plat, yet when Ex. drainage easement plat (bk.-pg. 940-212, 11/5/86, RGA) is
reviewed, plat shows an existing 15' drainage easement, with obscure (if any) bk.-pg. reference to a plat that
establishes bearing -distance for this drainage easement, meaning proposed nevi, departing drainage easement
has no tie to parcel boundary. Provide adequate tie to parcel boundary for new private drainage easement
bounded by L23, L24, L25. Response: Ties to the boundary have been provided to the proposed drainage
easement.
34. Delete Bond Street 23' Access Easement, or else provide easement linework. Applies to P7, as well.
Response: Text has been deleted.
>>. 'Drainage easement (DB 4716 PG 743-776) hatched areas to be vacated' label is confusing. Easements to be
vacated appear elsewhere, and no portion of this easement is hatched. Relocate to sheet P4, if a portion of this
existing drainage easement is to be vacated. Response: Labels have been revised to reflect intent.
P7
36. Item 34 applies. Response: Text has been deleted.
37. Recommend tie, L28.
38. Provide easement segment endpoints. Response: Segment and curve endpoint markers have been
provided.
39. Recommend ties for 5.99' and 13.87' easement segments. Response: Additional tie information has been
provided.
RECEIVED
SEP 3 0 7012
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT