Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB202000012 Staff Report 2020-02-20ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT Project #/Name ARB-2020-12: Brookhill Block 8B Review Type Final Site Plan Parcel Identification 04600000001800 (portion) & 046000000019A2 (portion) Location East side of Seminole Trail (Rt. 29 N) and north side of Polo Grounds Road (Rt. 643). Forest Lakes Community is to the north and Montgomery Ridge is to the east. Zoned Neighborhood Model District (NMD)/Entrance Corridor (EC) Owner/Applicant Charles R. Haugh and E.J. Oglesby, Jr., Trustees (Crockett Corporation)/Scott Collins (Collins Engineering) Magisterial District Rivanna Proposal To develop Block 8B with 9 multi -family attached buildings (110 dwelling units) and associated improvements on a 7.4-acre, L-shaped site. Context and Visibility Block 8B lies east of Rt. 29, an EC [Figure I]. Visibility of the development is expected to be limited by an existing tree line, a proposed landscape buffer, and other proposed development. Parcels to the west and south of Brookhill are rural in character, while parcels to the north and east are developed as the residential communities of Forest Lakes and Montgomery Ridge. ARB Meeting Date March 2, 2020 Staff Contact Paty Saternye PROJECT HISTORY DATE APPLICATION RESULT 11/9/2016 ZMA-2015-07 Staff comments provided on the rezoning proposal. 8/20/18 ARB-2018-102 ARB provided comments on the initial site plan for Block 8B. 3/2/2020 ARB-2020-12 ARB will review the final site plan for Block 8B. The ARB has also provided comments on the Initial Site Development Plans for Blocks 1A, 3, and Blocks 9, 10 & 11, and reviewed Initial and Final Site Development Plans for Blocks 4A, 4B, and 8A. BACKGROUND In 2015, the owners of abutting Tax Map Parcels 46-18, 46-18A, and 46-19 (a combined 277.5 acres) sought a Zoning Map Amendment (ZMA-2015-07) to rezone the rural properties (zoned R-1 Residential) into a Neighborhood Model District. [Figure 2] As per the approved ZMA, 19 blocks will be formed and developed as a Neighborhood Service Center (Block 1), with Urban Density Residential (Blocks 2 through 4) and Neighborhood Density Residential (Blocks 5 through 18) development. Block 19, a reduced three -acre curtilage around Brookhill house, will be preserved. [Figure 2]. The proffers were amended with ZMA-2018-11. This proposal entails the portion of the development designated as Block 8B. [Figure 31 This final site plan shows 9 multi -family buildings, including 110 condominiums on the east side of Archer Avenue, an interior road that parallels Rt. 29 and accesses Polo Grounds Road to the south. Private streets provide access to the condominium buildings within the block. Those buildings in the southeast corner of the site are arranged around a courtyard. A large stormwater management facility is proposed for the southeast corner of the site, adjacent to Polo Grounds Road. A 20' landscape buffer separates Block 8B from the historic Brookhill house to the northeast. Brookhill's approved Code of Development requires a 100' tree buffer along Rt. 29 limiting visibility of the complex from the street. [Figure 4]. There is also open space, steep slopes and wooded area to remain at the corner of Rt. 29 and Polo Grounds Road [Figure 2 & 3] that limit visibility. However, the southwestern corner of Block 8B is expected to have some minimal visibility from the EC, in particular, portions of buildings #1 and #3. Figure 1: map showing TMP 46-18 (Brookhill property) and which contains Block 8B. 3 Brookhill Development Land Use Map s _ ' 8B IF s w I. U RB,ahr WKE'i} USE s I URSAM OEM'Et1Y I__Y WEifAOOPWOOd D(N9TV t' GPEEN 5PACE Figure 2: Brookhill Development Land Use Map, page 7 of the Code of Development `Brookhill Neighborhood Model'; approved 1119116. The 277.5-acre property has been rezoned as a Neighborhood Model District. 4 Brookhill Development 11I rra tWe wept l Plan Figure 3: Brookhill Development Illustrative Conceptual Plan, page 8 of the Code of Development "Brookhill Neighborhood Model". approved 1119116. Note that the red boxes denote scope of work on this proposal, the L-shaped Block 8B. Figure 4: "Proposed I00' Buffer along Route 29 corridor, "page 20 of the Code of Development "Brookhill Neighborhood Model'; approved 11/9/16. ANALYSIS REF GUIDELINE 8/20/2018 COMMENTS CURRENT ISSUE RECOMMENDATION Pur ose 1 The goal of the regulation of the design of development Provide site sections of Block 8B from the EC The final site plan set exhibits 9 multi- Revise the scales specified on sheet within the designated Entrance Corridors is to insure that to determine visibility of the proposed buildings family buildings containing 110 16 to match the scale of the new development within the corridors reflects the and site structures. condominiums. The attached buildings drawing. traditional architecture of the area. Therefore, it is the are grouped in clusters of 4, 5, 6, 7 and purpose of ARB review and of these Guidelines, that 8 two -unit sections to create 9 building proposed development within the designated Entrance masses dispersed through the L-shaped Corridors reflect elements of design characteristic of the parcel. The maximum building height significant historical landmarks, buildings, and structures is listed as 4 stories or 50 feet; the of the Charlottesville and Albemarle area, and to promote proposed heights of the buildings have orderly and attractive development within these corridors. not been provided. (The elevations are Applicants should note that replication of historic structures not dimensioned.) is neither required nor desired. Site Section Map and Profiles (site plan 2 Visitors to the significant historical sites in the Charlottesville and Albemarle area experience these sites sheets 15 and 16) show three sections as ensembles of buildings, land, and vegetation. In order to from Rt. 29 through Blocks 8A and 8B, accomplish the integration of buildings, land, and illustrating that the proposed buildings vegetation characteristic of these sites, the Guidelines will not be visible from these vantage require attention to four primary factors: compatibility with points. Sections previously provided significant historic sites in the area; the character of the for the review of Block 4A & Block Entrance Corridor; site development and layout; and 8A [Figure 7 & 9] show that there will landscaping. be no visibility through those blocks. Minimal visibility is expected from the Polo Grounds Road/Rt. 29 intersection [Figure 6], though no sections were provided from that vantage point. Note that the scale in the title block and the vertical scale bar on sheet 16 (Site Section Profiles) do not match the scale of the profiles. COMP tibility with significant historic sites: 3 New structures and substantial additions to existing Submit material and color samples, Material and color samples, elevations Revise the elevations to include structures should respect the traditions of the architecture dimensioned elevations of the fagades, and floor of the fagades, and floor plans of the dimensions including the proposed of historically significant buildings in the Charlottesville plans of the attached multi -family buildings on multi -family buildings have been heights. and Albemarle area. Photographs of historic buildings in lots 1-15 and 38-55 for review. provided. No dimensions or labels the area, as well as drawings of architectural features, have been included on the elevations. which provide important examples of this tradition are contained in Appendix A. There is a broad range of colors proposed, some of which are consistent 4 The examples contained in Appendix A should be used as a guide for building design: the standard of compatibility with Blocks 4A and 4B [Figure 8]. with the area's historic structures is not intended to impose However, the colors for 8B branch out a rigid design solution for new development. Replication of into darker shades and greens and the design of the important historic sites in the area is browns. The darker shades are neither intended nor desired. The Guideline's standard of consistent with those colors approved compatibility can be met through building scale, materials, for Block 8A [Figure 7]. and forms which may be embodied in architecture which is contemporary as well as traditional. The Guidelines allow The proposed architectural design is individuality in design to accommodate varying tastes as contemporary and does not utilize well as special functional requirements. design components of the historic Brookhill house [Figure 51. The proposed buildings resemble townhouse rows that were prevalent in many localities from the eighteenth century, but compatibility with Albemarle's architecture, including the Brookhill house, is loosely achieved through the use of brick at the base of the units. The form of the buildings achieve a human scale by the breakup of the facade, both horizontally and vertically, and the use of different material colors, textures and details. Site development and layout 6 Site development should be sensitive to the existing natural None. The proposed private streets run None. landscape and should contribute to the creation of an orthogonally, parallel and organized development plan. This may be accomplished, to perpendicular to Archer Avenue, the the extent practical, by preserving the trees and rolling public road that will provide access to terrain typical of the area; planting new trees along streets the community. The proposed grading and pedestrian ways and choosing species that reflect throu out the block is extensive and native forest elements; insuring that any grading will blend severe. Existing vegetation will not be into the surrounding topography thereby creating a retained within Block 813, but street continuous landscape; preserving, to the extent practical, trees will be provided, and large existing significant river and stream valleys which may be portions of the overall development located on the site and integrating these features into the have, and will be, preserved. design of surrounding development; and limiting the building mass and height to a scale that does not overpower the natural settings of the site, or the Entrance Corridor. SPECIFIC GUIDELINES Comp tibility with the character of the Entrance Corridor 5 It is also an important objective of the Guidelines to See recommendation in #3. Some material and color samples have Revise the building elevations to establish a pattern of compatible architectural been provided but they are not label all materials. If colors will be characteristics throughout the Entrance Corridor in order to complete, and the materials and colors selected by future owners, add a achieve unity and coherence. Building designs should have not been called out on the note to the architectural drawings demonstrate sensitivity to other nearby structures within elevations. stating that the same color cannot be the Entrance Corridor. Where a designated corridor is used for adjacent units. substantially developed, these Guidelines require striking a Owners of individual units will choose careful balance between harmonizing new development materials and colors from the list of Provide material and color samples with the existing character of the corridor and achieving options. The changes in materials and for brick. compatibility with the significant historic sites in the area. colors contribute significantly to the establishment of human scale in the buildings. Consequently, it would be appropriate to limit the use of the same Revise the side elevations to include additional detail to avoid blankness at the third and fourth stories. COMP tibility with significant historic sites Structure design 9 Building forms and features, including roofs, windows, doors, materials, colors and textures should be colors on adjacent units. No brick compatible with the forms and features of the significant samples have been provided and no historic buildings in the area, exemplified by (but not colors have been specified. limited to) the buildings described in Appendix A [of the design guidelines]. The standard of compatibility can be The colors and materials selected for met through scale, materials, and forms which may be siding are the same as Blocks 9, 10 & embodied in architecture which is contemporary as well and are similar to Block 8A as traditional. The replication of important historic sites [Figures [Figures 7]. in Albemarle County is not the objective of these The side elevations have large areas of guidelines. blankness. The third and fourth stories are expected to have limited visibility. 10 Buildings should relate to their site and the surrounding context of buildings. 11 The overall design of buildings should have human scale. Scale should be integral to the building and site design. 12 Architecture proposed within the Entrance Corridor should use forms, shapes, scale, and materials to create a cohesive whole. 13 Any appearance of "blankness" resulting from building design should be relieved using design detail or vegetation, or both. 14 Arcades, colonnades, or other architectural connecting devices should be used to unify groups of buildings within a development. 15 Trademark buildings and related features should be modified to meet the requirements of the Guidelines. 16 Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should not be highly Provide the standard window glass note on the Architectural information has been None. tinted or highly reflective. Window glass in the Entrance architectural elevations submitted for review. submitted but does not include the Corridors should meet the following criteria: Visible light standard glass note. In this location, transmittance (VLT) shall not drop below 40%. Visible the window glass is not expected to light reflectance (VLR) shall not exceed 30%. have a significant impact on the EC. Specifications on the proposed window glass should be submitted with the application,for.final review. Accessory structures and equipment 17 Accessory structures and equipment should be integrated Provide a roof plan and architectural elevations No mechanical equipment is shown on Ensure all mechanical equipment is into the overall plan of development and shall, to the extent that show the placement and proposed heights the roof plan. Mechanical equipment shown and labeled on the site plan, possible, be compatible with the building designs used on of mechanical units, if roof -mounted is shown behind each residential unit, roof plan, and building elevations. the site. mechanical equipment is proposed. Show how all visibility of mechanical equipment from the between the driveways, but no label is provided. If roof -mounted mechanical equipment is proposed, show the 18 The following should be located to eliminate visibility from the Entrance Corridor street. If, after appropriate siting, these EC will be eliminated. placement and proposed heights of features will still have a negative visual impact on the There are no loading, service or refuse mechanical units. Show how all Entrance Corridor street, screening should be provided to If above -ground utilities are proposed, provide areas within the residential visibility of mechanical equipment eliminate visibility. a. Loading areas, b. Service areas, c. these and their easements on revised site plans. development. (A note states that each from the EC will be eliminated. Refuse areas, d. Storage areas, e. Mechanical equipment, f. residence will have individual garbage Above -ground utilities, and g. Chain link fence, barbed cans for collection.) The only utilities If above -ground utilities are wire, razor wire, and similar security fencing devices. depicted (sewer, water, and stormwater) are underground; if proposed, provide these and their easements on revised site plans. 19 Screening devices should be compatible with the design of the buildings and surrounding natural vegetation and may above -ground utilities are proposed, consist of. a. Walls, b. Plantings, and c. Fencing. such as electric, telephone, cable, etc., Provide details on the pergolas, they should be illustrated on the site label them in the elevations, and plan set. No fencing is proposed. show them in the roof plan. 10 A mail kiosk is proposed adjacent to the courtyard and will not be visible from the EC. The elevations show pergolas on the roofs; however, no labels or details are provided and only their posts are shown in the roof plan. 20 Surface runoff structures and detention ponds should be None. A large stormwater management None. designed to fit into the natural topography to avoid the need facility is proposed for the southeast for screening. When visible from the Entrance Corridor corner of the site, adjacent to Polo street, these features must be fully integrated into the Grounds Road. It is not expected to be landscape. They should not have the appearance of visible from the EC. engineered features. 21 The following note should be added to the site plan and the Include the mechanical equipment note on the The note is not provided on the site Include the mechanical equipment architectural plan: "Visibility of all mechanical equipment revised site plans and architectural drawings. plan set. note on the revised site plans and from the Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated." architectural drawings. Lighting 22- Provide in the site plan sufficient details to A single wall -mounted porch light is Include the standard lighting note in 1 show that all proposed light fixtures meet the shown on the elevations and the site plan. requirements of the lighting ordinance. renderings for each residential unit, but a photometric plan, luminaire schedule, manufacturers' specifications, cut sheets, and standard lighting note are not included in the site plan. The porch lights must meet the requirements specified in the standard lighting note. Given the location of the development, the porch lights are not expected to have a significant visual impact on the EC. Lands caping 7 The requirements of the Guidelines regarding landscaping None. The buffers required by the Code of None. are intended to reflect the landscaping characteristic of Development have been provided. many of the area's significant historic sites which is This includes a 100' landscape buffer characterized by large shade trees and lawns. Landscaping along Rt. 29 and a 30' landscape should promote visual order within the Entrance Corridor buffer along Polo Grounds Road, and help to integrate buildings into the existing which when mature will help screen 11 environment of the corridor. the site from the Entrance Corridor. 8 Continuity within the Entrance Corridor should be obtained by planting different types of plant materials that share similar characteristics. Such common elements allow for more flexibility in the design of structures because common landscape features will help to harmonize the appearance of development as seen from the street upon which the Corridor is centered. 32 Landscaping along the frontage of Entrance Corridor Provide a landscape plan for review at a scale of A landscape plan has been provided at None. streets should include the following: 1" = 30'. Include utilities and their easements I" = 30'. Utilities and easements are a. Large shade trees should be planted parallel to the on the plan, as well as a plant schedule. shown on the landscape plan. Entrance Corridor Street. Such trees should be at least 3'/2 inches caliper (measured 6 inches above the ground) and As this parcel does not abut the EC, should be of a plant species common to the area. Such trees this guideline for frontage planting should be located at least every 35 feet on center. does not apply. b. Flowering ornamental trees of a species common to the area should be interspersed among the trees required by the preceding paragraph. The ornamental trees need not alternate one for one with the large shade trees. They may be planted among the large shade trees in a less regular spacing pattern. c. In situations where appropriate, a three or four board fence or low stone wall, typical of the area, should align the frontage of the Entrance Corridor street. d. An area of sufficient width to accommodate the foregoing plantings and fencing should be reserved parallel to the Entrance Corridor street, and exclusive of road right- of-way and utility easements. 33 Landscaping along interior roads: Provide street trees on the east and south sides Street trees have been added to the Provide one more large shade tree a. Large trees should be planted parallel to all interior of Road E/Wesley Circle. east side of Wesley Circle (previously along the east side of Wesley Lane. roads. Such trees should be at least 2'/2 inches caliper Road E) and to the south side of (measured six inches above the ground) and should be of a Noush Court, which was Wesley plant species common to the area. Such trees should be Circle. located at least every 40 feet on center. The eastern side of Wesley Lane does 34 Landscaping along interior pedestrian ways: a. Medium trees should be planted parallel to all interior not have a sufficient number of large 12 pedestrian ways. Such trees should be at least 21/z inches trees along its length and loblolly caliper (measured six inches above the ground) and should pines have been utilized in one be of a species common to the area. Such trees should be location. located at least every 25 feet on center. Some trees have been provided along pedestrian ways where space is available. 35 Landscaping of parking areas: Provide shade trees on the eastern edge of the Shade trees have been provided along None. a. Large trees should align the perimeter of parking areas, site around the four parking spaces. the eastern edge of the site. located 40 feet on center. Trees should be planted in the interior of parking areas at the rate of one tree for every 10 There are ten parking spaces adjacent parking spaces provided and should be evenly distributed to the courtyard. Small ornamental throughout the interior of the parking area. trees are provided along the perimeter b. Trees required by the preceding paragraph should of the parking area and large shade measure 21/2 inches caliper (measured six inches above the trees are provided along the other two ground); should be evenly spaced; and should be of a sides of the courtyard. The species common to the area. Such trees should be planted combination of the two types of trees in planters or medians sufficiently large to maintain the satisfies the requirements. health of the tree and shall be protected by curbing. c. Shrubs should be provided as necessary to minimize the parking area's impact on Entrance Corridor streets. Shrubs should measure 24 inches in height. 36 Landscaping of buildings and other structures: See recommendation in #33. Shrubs have been added along the None. a. Trees or other vegetation should be planted along the southwestern corner of the site, where front of long buildings as necessary to soften the the buildings may be visible from the appearance of exterior walls. The spacing, size, and type of EC. Street trees, and trees within the such trees or vegetation should be determined by the 30' landscape buffer on Polo Grounds length, height, and blankness of such walls. Road, will also soften the appearance b. Shrubs should be used to integrate the site, buildings, of the proposed buildings. and other structures; dumpsters, accessory buildings and structures; "drive thru" windows; service areas; and signs. Plantings are provided on all sides of Shrubs should measure at least 24 inches in height. the proposed stormwater management facility in the southeastern corner of the site mitigating its appearance and integrating it into the overall landscape. 37 Plant species: See recommendation in #32. A landscape plan, including a plant None. a. Plantspecies required should be as approved by the Staff schedule, is included in the site plan 13 based upon but not limited to the Generic Landscape Plan Provide the standard plant health note on all and the plant species are appropriate. Recommended Species List and Native Plants for Virginia landscape plans submitted for review. Landscapes (Appendix D . The standard plant health note has been included in the plan. 38 Plant health: The following note should be added to the landscape plan: "All site plantings of trees and shrubs shall be allowed to reach, and be maintained at, mature height; the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall be pruned minimally and only to support the overall health of the plant." Site Development and layout Develo went pattern 39 The relationship of buildings and other structures to the See recommendation in #7. The development exhibits an None. Entrance Corridor street and to other development within organized pattern of streets and the corridor should be as follows: sidewalks. The proposed buildings do a. An organized pattern of roads, service lanes, bike paths, not front the EC, but a majority of the and pedestrian walks should guide the layout of the site. lots are oriented parallel to an interior b. In general, buildings fronting the Entrance Corridor public road, Archer Avenue. street should be parallel to the street. Building groupings Provisions have been made for should be arranged to parallel the Entrance Corridor street. connections to adjacent thoroughfares, c. Provisions should be made for connections to adjacent such as Archer Avenue and Polo pedestrian and vehicular circulation systems. Grounds Road. d. Open spaces should be tied into surrounding areas to provide continuity within the Entrance Corridor. The courtyard amenity and the e. If significant natural features exist on the site (including stormwater management facility in the creek valleys, steep slopes, significant trees or rock southeast part of the site are the only outcroppings), to the extent practical, then such natural open spaces provided. features should be reflected in the site layout. If the provisions of Section 32.5.6.n of the Albemarle County Most of the vegetation currently on the Zoning Ordinance apply, then improvements required by site will be cleared for development, that section should be located so as to maximize the use of and significant grading is proposed. existing features in screening such improvements from Entrance Corridor streets. f. The placement of structures on the site should respect existing views and vistas on and around the site. Site Gradin 40 Site grading should maintain the basic relationship of the site See recommendations in #1 and #7. See current issues for #1. None. to surrounding conditions by limiting the use of retaining 14 walls and by shaping the terrain through the use of smooth, Extensive grading is proposed rounded land forms that blend with the existing terrain. Steep throughout the site, especially on the cut or fill sections are generally unacceptable. Proposed south side of the site, and along the contours on the grading plan shall be rounded with a ten foot perimeter of the Brookhill house minimum radius where they meet the adjacent condition. parcel, including within the landscape Final grading should achieve a natural, rather than buffers. Retaining walls are used engineered, appearance. Retaining walls 6 feet in height and extensively and reach heights of 6'. taller, when necessary, shall be terraced and planted to blend The terraces, with the exception of a with the landscape. small area behind building #8, are planted to blend with the landscape. 41 No grading, trenching, or tunneling should occur within the None. Tree protection fencing has been Provide tree protection fencing and drip line of any trees or other existing features designated for provided in the landscape plan, but is labels in the grading plan. preservation in the final Certificate of Appropriateness. not shown on the grading plan, for Adequate tree protection fencing should be shown on, and existing trees within the 20' landscape coordinated throughout, the grading, landscaping and erosion buffer around the Brookhill house and sediment control plans. parcel. A conservation checklist has been provided. 42 Areas designated for preservation in the final Certificate of Appropriateness should be clearly delineated and protected on the site prior to any grading activity on the site. This Natural drainage patterns have not protection should remain in place until completion of the been preserved. development of the site. 43 Preservation areas should be protected from storage or movement of heavy equipment within this area. 44 Natural drainage patterns (or to the extent required, new drainage patterns) should be incorporated into the finished site to the extent possible. 15 f.Yilll1 EXRX11 7 01-17— [INIP1 Staff recommends the following as the primary points of discussion: • Materials and colors (no specific locations, insufficient information) • Lighting Visibility of the proposed development. Regarding the Final Site Plan: Staff recommends approval with the following conditions: 1. Revise the scales specified on sheet 16 to match the scale of the drawing. 2. Revise the elevations to include dimensions including the proposed heights. 3. Revise the building elevations to label all materials. If colors will be selected by future owners, add a note to the architectural drawings stating that the same color cannot be used for adjacent units. 4. Provide material and color samples for brick. 5. Revise the side elevations to include additional detail to avoid blankness at the third and fourth stories. 6. Ensure all mechanical equipment is shown and labeled on the site plan, roof plan, and building elevations. If roof -mounted mechanical equipment is proposed, show the placement and proposed heights of mechanical units. Show how all visibility of mechanical equipment from the EC will be eliminated. 7. If above -ground utilities are proposed, provide these and their easements on revised site plans. 8. Provide details on the pergolas, label them in the elevations, and show them in the roof plan. 9. Include the mechanical equipment note on the revised site plans and architectural drawings: Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated. 10. Include the standard lighting note in the site plan: Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp that emits 3, 000 or more initial lumens shall be a full cutoff luminaire and shall be arranged or shielded to reflect light away from adjoining residential districts and away from adjacent roads. The spillover of lighting from luminaires onto public roads and property in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall not exceed one halffootcandle. 11. Provide one more large shade tree along the east side of Wesley Lane. 12. Provide tree protection fencing and labels in the grading plan. 16 TABLE A This report is based on the following submittal items: Sheet # Drawing Name Drawing Date 1 Cover 1/21/2020 IA Proffers 1/21/2020 1B Proffers 1/21/2020 2 Brookhill Overall Master Plan 1/21/2020 3 Brookhill Overall Block Plan 1/21/2020 4 Existing conditions 1/21/2020 5 Layout Plan 1/21/2020 6 Layout Plan 1/21/2020 7 Utility Plan 1/21/2020 8 Utility Plan 1/21/2020 9 Grading & Drainage Plan 1/21/2020 10 Grading & Drainage Plan 1/21/2020 11 Site Distance Profiles 1/21/2020 12 Landscaping Plan 1/21/2020 13 Landscaping Plan 1/21/2020 14 Block 8 Landscaping Plan 1/21/2020 15 Site Section Ma 1/21/2020 16 Site Sections Profiles 1/21/2020 B 1.00 Foundation Plan Left portion of foundation 10/25/2019 B 1.01 Foundation Plan (Right portion of foundation 10/25/2019 B1.02 Elevation Left portion of front 10/25/2019 B 1.03 Elevation (Right portion of front) 10/25/2019 B 1.04 Elevations Rear, left & right) 10/25/2019 B2.00 Floor Plan (Left portion of first floor) 10/25/2019 B2.01 Floor Plan (Right portion of first floor 10/25/2019 B3.00 Floor Plan Left portion of second floor 10/25/2019 17 133.01 Floor Plan (Right portion of second floor 10/25/2019 B4.00 Floor Plan Left portion of third floor 10/25/2019 B4.01 Floor Plan (Right portion of third floor 10/25/2019 135.00 Floor Plan Left portion of fourth floor 10/25/2019 B5.01 Floor Plan (Right portion of fourth floor) 10/25/2019 B6.00 Roof Plan Left portion of roof) 10/25/2019 B6.01 Roof Plan (Right portion of roof) 10/25/2019 Rendering of Elevation Brookhill Block 8B Final ARB Submittal letter attached to submittal with threephotos) Material Samples: JamesHardie Siding Colors - Artie White, Cobble Stone, Timber Bark Night Grey, Pearl Grey, Grey Slate, Light Mist, Khaki Brown; Owens Corning TruDefinition Duration Shingles — Onyx Black. w } z 11 PROPOSED SENIOR PROPOSED ROOFTOP EXISTING 7-R££5 i LIVING FACILITY EQUIPMENT z o? (rO REM�A/JVJ� a ELEV = 479.08 PROPOSED ROOF ELEV = 472.00 'LL5 TREES - - - -EYE �—— — Ae-1 _: FFE=425.00 EX. ELEV " __ _ _ :: : _ ---- ----- ---- - --- --- --- # -- __ __ --- iir.- ri�v _. _ -_ -_ -_ _ -_ -_ _ _ ___ - _- �- -_- .. - "-_ --_"- - _- - _-_ - _- - ]LINE OF SIGHT "A" SCALE: 1 "=30' East Elevation Figure 7. Block 8A of Brookhill. Site Section showing visibility of site from A 29 (EQ and rendering of East Elevation. 21 4 ]J11957L' 1 fitft P. - a r 11 Jill 11111 milli 10.1 111 MOW 0 ■■■ ■■ 711 ■■ ■■ -0 ON .■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ISETS fir ■■ ■ ■ o■,:-.m ■■ ■■■ ►�1 i! __ uiiiuiuuiiiiii uiuuu�uii%�'���p o o� s�l_up o o ,� m�uuliiiiiui 1 R ON I l0 — u — , m I�.11■ION ■w ■�ME1f:l i L� � ili •���11'.L. ���la� � i ° � � �� i�� � i�i .■■ - 4 >ry i� .r ■■o �■ ■■ ■■■ yn �.... I -- ■L■ a ■ ■ -- � ■■ II. ■■I� i■ Ilii.a � T7II� � ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ivi''I _ p o _ _P111�it Y■.i e. ' ` ■i ll�yi■fill ■ ■ llii■i..l o ■'■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ppAA ■ ■. r ■ ■ 0 ■rr■ ■I■■, ■. ■ ■ ■ .... ■■ .... ■I■ ■I■ ■■A�NII ■■I■�I .���Ll ■®■ ■uY■ ©lil■IG� iI■I■ ��� IIIIIIIIIIII�III�III II Illfl II II II �- � �� o u i� �III�711�I��II�II� ��I�I�IYIIII�I�II� i"i�f ■■■ p ■ ■ 'y: 0 -..i� ..- --- --- ■■ ■11" I Ellin �� ■'m r,'_■ FF ■■■ ■■■ ■ ■ n .._ - ■■ ■u ■■■ I, ■ I, ■ PLAN VIEW NOT TO SCALE Figure 9: Brookhill Block 4 — Site Sections. mnra- .wi.sm SECTION A•A NOT TO SCA u.ruaien rnie� -rwtnuin - .wrt,ww w w r .. r SECTION B•B NOT TO SCALE PROMS" PftG-Pc7''SEu BUILDING [IIISInKa AND Bl1YLbtNO „„, .� PIK"maG TREES F- ir - 'pr SECTION C-C NOT TO SCE 23 a A COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North 'Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Phone (434) 296-5832 August 24, 2018 Scott Collins Collins Engineering 200 Garrett Street. Suite K Charlottesville, Va 22902 RE: ARB-2018-102: Brookhill, Block 811, Initial Site Development Plan Dear Mr. Collins, Fax (434) 972-4126 At its meeting on Monday, August 20. 201 S, the Albemarle County Architectural Review Board unanimously voted to forward the following recommendations on the above -noted Initial Site Development Plan to the agent for the Site Review Committee: • Regarding requirements to satisfy the design guidelines as per § 18-30.6.4c(2), (3) and (5) and recommended conditions of initial plan approval: 1. None. Note that a Certificate of Appropriateness is required prior to final site plan approval. • Regarding recommendations on the plan as it relates to the guidelines: None. • Regarding conditions to be satisfied prior to issuance of a grading permit: None. • Regarding the final site plan submittal: 1. Architecture and landscaping will be reviewed with a future submittal. A Certificate of Appropriateness is required prior to final site plan approval. 2. Provide site sections of Block 8B from the EC to determine visibility of the proposed buildings and site structures. 3. Submit material and color samples, dimensioned elevations of the fagades, and floor plans of the attached multi -family buildings on lots 1-15 and 38-55 for review. 4. Provide the standard window glass note on the architectural elevations submitted for review: Window glass in the Entrance Corridors .should meet the fbllowing criteria: Visible light transmittance (VLT) shall not drop below 40%, Visible light reflectance (VL.R) shall not exceed 30%. 5. Provide a roof plan and architectural elevations that show the placement and proposed heights of mechanical units, if roof -mounted mechanical equipment is proposed. Show how all visibility of mechanical equipment from the EC will be eliminated. 6. If above -ground utilities are proposed, provide these and their casements on revised site plans. 7, Include the mechanical equipment note on the revised site plans and architectural drawings: Visibilin, pf all mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be elintinalcd. 8. Provide in the site plan sufficient details to show that all proposed light fixtures meet the requirements of the lighting ordinance. 9. Provide a landscape plan for review at a scale of 1" = 30'. Include utilities and their easements on the plan, as well as a plant schedule. l0. Provide street trees on the east and south sides of Road ElWesley Circle. 11. Provide shade trees on the eastern edge of the site around the four parking spaces. 12. Provide the standard plant health note on all landscape plans submitted for review: All site plantings of trees and shrubs shall be allowed to reach. and he maintained at, mature height; the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees .shall he pruned ininimally and only, to support the overall health cif the plant. You may submit your application for continued ARB review at your earliest convenience. Application forms, checklists and schedules are available on-line at www.albemarle,orgfARB. Please be certain that your ARB submittal addresses the above -noted issues. If you have any questions concerning any of the above, please feel free to contact me. Sincerelv. Heather McMahon Senior Planner N