Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP202000010 Review Comments Initial Site Plan 2020-03-04r j�i`1r COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126 March 4, 2020 Justin Shimp Shimp Engineering RE: SDP-2020-010-Regents School- Initial Site Plan Mr. Shimp: The Site Review Committee has reviewed the development proposal referenced above. Initial comments for the following divisions of the Department of Community Development and other agencies, as applicable, are attached: Albemarle County Engineering Services (Engineer) Albemarle County Planning Services (Planner) Albemarle County Information Services (E911) Albemarle County Building Inspections (Building Official) Albemarle County Planning Services (Architectural Review Board) Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue Albemarle County Service Authority Virginia Department of Health Virginia Department of Transportation Comments reflect information available at the time the development proposal was reviewed, and should not be considered final. However, the Site Review Committee has attempted to identify all issues that will be required to be resolved prior to Final Site Plan approval. The Lead Reviewer will either approve with conditions or deny the Initial Site Plan within 15 days of the Site Review Meeting. Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional information. Sincerely, Megan Nedostup Principal Planner Planning Services Cc: Regents School of Charlottesville 200 Bob Finley Way Charlottesville, VA 22903 -ALlrj County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Justin Shimp From: Megan Nedostup- Principal Planner Division: Planning Services Date: March 2, 2020 Subject: SDP2020-010 Regents School- Initial Site Plan The Planner for the Planning Services Division of the Albemarle County Department Community Development will recommend approve the plan referred to above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.) [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.] Requirements: 1. [SP condition #3] The total number of students is above 280. An additional TIA was provided, however it was submitted after the application, and therefore a determination has not been made that the proposed number of students can be approved. This determination will need to occur prior to approval of the final site plan, or the students will need to be reduced to 280 or a new special use permit will need to be submitted and approved. 2. [32.5.2(b)] Include the maximum height of all structures. Sheet 1 states the building shall be limited to 2 stories per the conditions of the SP, however there are no conditions related to building height. The height should be in conformance with the R1 zoning, which is 35 feet. 3. [32.5.2(b)] See comments from Zoning on the parking. Provide a plan for overflow/events. Also, reference the parking study on Sheet one for the amount provided. 4. [32.5.2(c)] Will phasing be planned? If so, show phase lines including how utilities, parking, etc, will be accommodated through phasing. 5. [32.5.2(e)] Show the existing landscape features in accordance with this section. Also, show the limits of disturbance including utilities, accurately on the plan. 6. [32.5.2(i)] Label on all sheets the existing Reservoir Road. Also include the state route number, right of way lines and width, and centerline radii and pavement width. 7. [32.5.2(n)] Provide the location and dimensions for all existing and proposed improvements including: buildings (max height for each building), walkways, fences, walls (including height), trash containers, outdoor lighting, recreational areas and facilities, loading and service areas, and the proposed paving material types for all walks and parking lots. 8. [32.5.2(n); SP] Show the open space, right of way dedication (state: dedicated to public use), and trail connections per sheet 4 of the Special Use Permit. 2) A pedestrian connection shall be provided from the site to TMP 76-17. The design and location of the pedestrian path shall be finalized during the site plan process. 3) Area depicted as Right —of --Way reservation area shall be reserved for future dedication upon demand by the County of Albemarle or the Virginia Department of Transportation. 4) A minimum of 25% of the school campus site, as shown on sheet C3, shall be delineated as open space. 9. [4.17] Will lighting be proposed? If so, a lighting plan in accordance with this section is required. Please also add the conditions of the special exception for lighting to the plan. 10. Easement plats and associated deeds will be required for all proposed easements including right of way dedication, utility easements, open space, etc. 11. [32.7.9] Not all required landscaping is shown on the landscape plan. All required landscaping will need to be shown for the final site plan in accordance with this section. 12. [Recommendation] It appears that the circulation for the plan doesn't allow passenger side drop off but is designed to have drop off on the driver's side, which isn't typical for schools. Please clarify. 13. [Recommendation] The City of Charlottesville Parks and Rec has reached out to see if a trail connection could be provided. Please contact Chris Gensic at the city if there is interest in providing a trail, and coordinate with County Parks and Rec. Please contact Megan Nedostup at the Department of Community Development 296-5832 ext. 3004 for further information. 2 Review Comments for SDP202000010 Initial Site Plan Project Name: Regents School of Charlottesville - Initial - Digital Date Completed: Monday, February 24, 2020 Department/Division/Agency: Review Status: Reviewer: Shawn Maddox -771 FFire Rescue Requested Changes 1. Fire apparatus access roads shall extend to within 150 feet (45 720 mm) of all portions of the facility and all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of the buildings as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the buildings or facility. Currently it appears some of the structures are over 300 from the travel lane provided. 2. A knox box will be required on the main structure that is capable of serving the school complex. A note on the plans indicating this requirement will suffice. 3. There are no hydrants shown on the site plan. Add hydrants to accomodate a spacing of not greater than 500'. If any of the structures are to be sprinklered then the FDC must be shown on the plan and must have a hydrant located within 100' of any FDC. 4. The on site travel ways shall be marked no parking fire lane. 5. ISO needed fire flow calculations are required. 6. A current fire flow test is required prior to final acceptance. Review Comments for SDP202000010 Initial Site Plan Project Name: Regents School of Charlottesville - Initial - Digital Date Completed: Friday, February 28, 2020 Department/Division/Agency: Review Status: Reviewer: Kevin Mccollum I FCDID Admin Zonina See Recommendations �J Along with the initial site plan submittal there was a request for a Zoning determination for the minimum number of required spaces for a proposed private school use (4.12.6 and 4.12.7). After analyzing their request and referring to several other approved private school site plans and relevant ite parking data, it would be my determination that their proposed number of spaces (90) would be appropriate for 328 students and 66 faculty. Any increase in students or faculty beyond those numbers will need a new parking analysis. Comment: Although, I think the number of parking spaces is appropriate for a typical school day, I have some concerns that there will be parking issues for occassional events such as sporting events or other school related events. Other Schools (Peabody School SDP2019-7) have provided available offsite parking on adjacent parcels and businesses to provide enough parking when their is spill over (shared parking aggreement). My recommendation is that the Applicant think about how they can provide extra parking if occassional events require more than the 90 parking spaces. Review Comments for SDP202000010 Initial Site Plan Project Name: Regents School of Charlottesville - Initial - Digital Date Completed: Monday, March 02, 2020 Department/Division/Agency: Review Status: Reviewer: Richard Nelson LJ IACSA Requested Changes Show fire protection for the site. Confirm available fire flow to the site. Recent fire flows for the neighboring parcel show a Q20 of 940 gpm. Review Comments for SDP202000010 Initial Site Plan Project Name: Regents School of Charlottesville - Initial - Digital Date Completed: Friday, February 21 , 2020 Department/Division/Agency: Review Status: Reviewer: Brian Becker FECD❑ E911 Requested Changes Critical Issues: There appears to be thirteen (13) buildings that are intended to be occupied on the plan. Occupied buildings are addressable. The entranceway to the parking lot provides access to three or more addressable structures and will therefore require a road name. Comments: Per the Albemarle County Road Naming and Property Numbering Ordinance, Sec. 7-200, Part B (page 2 of the PDF): "It is intended by this article that all roads within the county which serve or are designed to serve three (3) or more dwelling units or business structures shall be named..." Please provide this office at least three (3) alternative road names for review, in case the first choices are not acceptable. The applicant can contact this office to pre -address the addressable buildings in their preferred manner, otherwise, addresses will be assigned at the time of construction. Review Comments for SDP202000010 Initial Site Plan Project Name: Regents School of Charlottesville - Initial - Digital Date Completed: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 Department/Division/Agency: Review Status: Reviewer: Michael Dellinger LJ ICD❑ Inspections See Recommendations Add the following note to the general notes page: Accessible routes and features must be provided throughout the site in accordance with the VCC and ICC A117.1-2009. Site engineer need to coordinate with architect for proper access and slopes. Need to verify plumbing fixture distances in accordance with 403.3.3 of the Va Plumbing Code. Provide distance from most remote usable feature. Add the following to the general notes page: All roof drains shall discharge in a manner not to cause a public nuisance and not over sidewalks. Need to verifiy proper fire ratings if buildings are closer than permitted in the VCC. Provide distances between buildings. Megan Nedostup From: Dyon Vega <DVega@rivanna.org> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2020 2:20 PM To: Megan Nedostup Cc: vfort@rivanna.org; Richard Nelson Subject: Regents School Review CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe. Tim, RWSA has reviewed the Initial Site Plan for Regents School as prepared by Shimp Engineering, P.C. and dated 04/29/2019 and has the following general comments for the applicant: General: 1. RWSA is currently in preliminary phases of design for a new raw water main along reservoir road to replace the existing 1908 cast iron raw water main. RWSA may require easement on TMP 76-17 for construction of the raw water main and are currently looking to start construction in 2023-2024. Sheet C4, C5: 1. Please include size and type on RWSA 18" Cl Raw Water Line. Let me know if you have any questions. Dyon Vega Civil Engineer RIVAN "qA WYATEA & SMR AUTHORITY CI Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority (434) 977-2970, Ext. 170 695 Moores Creek Lane Charlottesville, VA 22902 www.rivanna.org w February 25, 2020 County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 40I McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Attn: Megan Nedostup Re: Regents School of Charlottesville — Initial Site Plan SP-2020-00010 Review #I Dear Ms. Nedostup: The Department of Transportation, Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use Section, has reviewed the above referenced plan as submitted by Shimp Engineering, dated 21 January 2020, and offers the following comments: Land use 1. Please add road name, route number, ADT, design/posted speed. 2. Please refer to the VDOT Road Design Manual, appendix F, access management design standards for entrances and intersections. Minimum width for commercial entrances needs to be 30 ft., or greater. Minimum curb radii needs to be 25 ft. 3. Please show mill and overlay on plans in accordance with WP-2 and show limits of mill and overlay. Also please add the detail to the plans. 4. The mill and overlay will require work to the centerline, so flagging operations will be necessary. Please provide MOT plan in Accordance with Virginia Work Area Protection Manual. 5. Please see Road Design Manual appendix F- access management design standards for entrances and intersections, figure 4-10, commercial entrance design. 6. Please provide a right and left turn lane warrant analyses as shown in appendix F- pg., F-96. 7. Please refer to appendix F- pg., F-109, for the appropriate design vehicle and turning radius by land use. PIease provide auto turn analyses. 8. Please provide ditch line calculations. Also please show the appropriate culvert pipe at proposed entrances. 9. CD's 1-2 may be needed during construction of Reservoir road. 10. Note that the final site plan must show conformance with the VDOT Road Design Manual Appendices B ( 1) and F, as well as any other applicable standards, regulations or other requirements. 11. Please provide sight distance profiles. 12. PIease provide details for road widening. aL6'1-11:d �' �'a �� - �� 10. Provide Autoturn exhibit. Please ensure adequate pavement width and turning radii is provided for bus and firetruck movements. 11. Show & label offsite easements for proposed grading (along road, C11-C13) & improvements (utility connection, C10). 12. Retaining wall design plans required for wall next to parking lot. 13. What is the maximum trips (VDP), and percentage of buses? 14. The minimum entrance radius is 25'. 1 believe figure 4-11 entrance standards apply but check with VDOT. Cvmrnercial Entrance Design along Local Streets with Curb and Gutter or Shoulders COMMERCIAL ENTRANCE DESIGN ALONG LOCAL STREETS WITH CURB AND GUTTER OR SHOULDERS SINGLE TWO - WAY ENTRANCE now � ff WW�i +d' u C u ft Edge of Pavement 190tg8. nlran[ Del aWt Shown: rr lhm aheel may Mrdl�lyl to meepet up lfl sll��rr��epppWra-enq R.dir vtcry a Oisthcs, when he'1 o z atdtna ang,ne -)g pnnp pjes svun it an NWe r�puotDaeas d nned in Secti nrt� ccordanc mt Se'd CG. i wl li vro�Wodem Cvro arW Gullor or Ctrr6lnp msy pp OMD1gd on O slsl IricS[ /l[Inilnls lralorap(xoved by Res4dency o. When [l+rd a used on a steam ", oho m, 1- the besal barA -t- a min,mum of LETTER SY NLQL QIMENSIQNS C ntrgncq Thrpet Tggtflq 4-2 en Wner Clverene:e Figure 4-9 tl * 25' - 50' rand Curb and G rllar or Cud—g. The selected shell a[C rniipdere She amlopelep type of vgrrl C.M u"90. Larpb, trsdil should b. r!.�nsrdergai by he tivslyl-,r nr mny he repufrod GY the [n[j iilnQr if fArppr vOhIG1O� Ir�� ent1[I i4o. ® bo Pons on r. 330 M ryn� radelucid -he Innp26' [hawlwalion 18�nnD 14 uyed W * 24' Mlrrlmum Y + 90' Prerered 00' LAln.mum * For Suhdlr�.dpsiongrySlreal And Alley ocnnno, K+na. idl, 7f,a Rord Daspn wt,lAd FIGURE 4-11 COMMERCIAL ENTRANCE DESIGNS ALONG LOCAL STREETS' 15. Parking appears to exceed 5% grade (measures 9%): I �1$, 0' 16. Sor �n n m 17 �U r` 6 FF Show/Provide access easements to SWM facilities. a proposed site grading missing between 510' to 520' contours. ----------- I; 18. Grading — Constructed slopes steeper than 3:1 must be permanently stabilized with vegetation hardier than grass, which will not require mowing. [DSM, pg. 22] Links/refs: https://www.deg.virginia.gov/Portals/0/DEQIWater/StormwaterManagement/Erosion Sediment C ontrol Handbook/Chapter/o203%20-/0203.32.pdf www.deg.virginia.gov/Portals/0/DEQ/Water/StormwaterManagement/Erosion Sediment Control Handbook/Chapter%203%20-/0203.37.pdf Invasive Non -Native Species Alternative Virgrinia Native Common Name Common Name Scientitk Name Common Reed Great bulrush Schoenopleclus tahernaemontane Common Cattall Typha latitolia Chinese Lespedeza Birdsfoot Trefoil Orchard Grass Redtnp Weeping Lovegrass Roundheaded bushclover Lespedeza capitata Patrid a pea Chamaecnsta tasciculata Butter0 weed Asc+epras tuberosa Jve-pye weed Eutrochium duh+ufn Black-eyed Susan Rudbeckoa Ugida Big blue stem Andropogon gerardie Indian grass Sorghastrum nufans Side oats grama Soulelaua cuRipendufa Crownvetch Roundheaded bushclover Lespedeza caprtata Patridge pea Chamaecnsta tasciculata Big blue stem Andropogon gerardie Little blue stem SChilaChynum SCoparium Indian grass Sorghastrum nufans Switchgrass Panicum virgatum Tall Fescue Big blue stem Andropogon gerardie Little blue stem Schizarhyrium scopanum Indian grass Sorghastrum nufans Switchgrnss Panicum virgatum Broomsedge Andropogon virgrnicus Deerlongue Dkhanlhetium clandestmum Side oats grama Soulelaua cuRipendufa Canadian wildrye 0ymus canadensis Botuebmsh grass j Mymus hystnx Virginia wildrye I Mymus virgmicus Review Comments for SDP20200001 0 11nitial Site Plan Project Name: Regents School of Charlottesville - Initial - Digital Date Completed: Tuesday, March 03, 2020 Department1DivisionfAgency: Review Status: Reviewer: Margaret Maliszewski BBARB See Recommendations At the March 2, 2020 meeting, the ARB voted to approve the consent agenda and forward the recommendations outlined in the staff report to the Agent for the Site Review Committee, as follows: • Regarding requirements to satisfy the design guidelines as per § 18-30.6.4c(2), (3) and (6) and recommended conditions of initial plan approval: o Prior to Initial Plan approval the following items shall be resolved to the satisfaction of the ARB: The ARB recommends approval of the Initial Plan without conditions_ o Note that a Certificate of Appropriateness is required prior to final site plan approval_ • Regarding recommendations on the plan as it relates to the guidelines: None_ • Regarding conditions to be satisfied prior to issriance of a grading permit: 1_ Show tree protection fencing on_ and coordinated throughout, the grading, landscaping, and erosion and sediment control plans_ • Regarding the final site plan submittal: A Certificate of Appropriateness is required prior to final site plan approval_ The following items and all items on the ARB Final Site Plan Checklist must be addressed: 1_ Provide architectural designs for review_ _ Provide site sections to clarify the anticipated level of visibility of the various components of the development from the Entrance Corridors- 3- Update the plans to include information on accessory structures and equipment- 4- Provide a complete lighting plan for review_ 5_ Provide parking lot trees at 21/° caliper at planting- 6- Provide a complete plant schedule for review_ 7_ Add the standard plant health note to the plan: 'All site plantings of trees and shrubs shall be allowed to reach, and be maintained at, mature height; the topping of trees is prohibited_ Shrubs and trees shall be pruned minimally and only to support the overall health of the plant_" 8_ Revise the plan to show an accurate ;tree line to remain" that accounts for all proposed development, including proposed utilities and stormwater facilities- 9- Show tree protection fencing on, and coordinated throughout, the grading, landscaping and erosion and sediment control plans_ Page: County of Albemarle Printed On: Fo310412020