HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB201900161 Minutes 2020-01-06,V../ 14✓
1. Show the location of mechanical equipment (building and ground mounted) on the
site and architectural plans and show how it will be screened from the EC.
2. Provide a complete plant schedule with the next submittal.
3. Show how landscaping, retaining walls and signage will be coordinated at the
street frontage and how an appropriate appearance for the EC will be achieved.
Perspective renderings are recommended.
4. Provide large perimeter parking lot trees, 21/" caliper at planting, at 40'on center.
5. Add 6 interior parking lot trees on the landscaping plan; or provide 4 additional
perimeter trees with 2 additional interior trees.
6. Add the plant health note to the plan.
7. Show the existing trees, tree conservation easement, and landscaping easement
on the existing conditions plan.
8. Resolve the development issues arising from the easements on the subject
property.
9. Revise the plan to provide landscaping to compensate for removed landscaping
required to mitigate visual impacts of the bank site.
10. Show existing trees on the existing conditions plan. Show trees to remain on the
site plan.
11. Identify the retaining wall heights on the south side of the hotel on the grading plan.
Provide complete information on the wall on the north side of the parcel.
12. Indicate retaining wall material(s) and color(s) on the plan. A physical sample may
be necessary for review.
13. Enhance the planting of the terraced retaining walls.
14. Provide site sections and perspective drawings to clarify appearance and visibility
of the hotel and retaining walls.
15. Show existing trees on the existing conditions plan.
16. Show areas designated for preservation, if any, on the site plan. Maintain grading
outside the driplines of trees to remain. Show tree protection fencing on, and
coordinated throughout, the grading, landscaping, and erosion and sediment
control plans.
Mr. Van Der Werf seconded the motion.
The motion was carried by a vote of 3:0 (Hancock absent)
OTHER BUSINESS
a. ARB-2019-01: 5th Street Commercial Minor: Canopy Change
Staff Contact: Margaret Maliszewski
Representative for Project: Caitlin Schafer
After discussing the proposed elimination of the center canopy on Building A, it was the consensus
of the ARB that without the canopy the building had a simple, muted appearance that looked
appropriate, so the canopy could be eliminated.
b. ARB-2019-161: Brookhill Block 1A
Staff Contact: Margaret Maliszewski
Albemarle County Architectural Review Board
FINAL Action Memo Minutes January 6, 2020
5
After viewing the location of the Block 1A proposal and other projects already reviewed in the
development, it was the consensus of the ARB that ARB review was not required.
c. ARB-2019-160: Albemarle High School Metal Panels
Staff Contact: Khris Taggart
Following staff's overview of the proposal noting the limited extent of the additional metal, and
after confirming that the metal would match that which was already installed, the ARB agreed that
staff level review of the application was appropriate.
d. Minutes Approval: December 16, 2019
Motion: Mr. Stoner moved to approve the December 16, 2019 meeting minutes.
Mr. Van Der Werf seconded the motion.
The motion was carried by a vote of 3:0 (Hancock absent)
e. Next ARB Meeting: Tuesday, January 21, 2020
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 2:45 p.m. to the next ARB meeting on Tuesday, January 21, 2020
in Lane Auditorium, Second Floor, County Office Building at 1:00 p.m.
Stan Binsted, Chair
Recorded and transcribed by Carolyn Shaffer, Clerk
Albemarle County Architectural Review Board
FINAL Action Memo Minutes January 6, 2020
6