HomeMy WebLinkAboutZMA201900001 Staff Report 2020-01-14ALBEMARLE COUNTY
STAFF REPORT
Project Name: ZMA201900001 999 Rio
Staff: Tori Kanellopoulos, Planner
Road
Planning Commission Hearing: January
Board of Supervisors Public Hearing: March 4,
14, 2020
2020
Owner: Windmill Ventures LLC
Applicant: Nicole Scro, Gallifrey Enterprises
Acreage: 1.947 acres
Rezone from: R-4 Residential to Neighborhood
Model District (NMD)
TMP: 06100-00-00-154BO
Location: 999 Rio Road East, Charlottesville VA
22901
School Districts: Agnor-Hurt (Elementary);
Current by -right use: Maximum of 7 dwelling
Burley (Middle School); Albemarle (High
units (11 dwelling units with bonus factors)
School)
Magisterial District: Rio
Proffers: None
Proposal: Rezone 1.947 acres from R-4
Requested # of Dwelling Units per ZMA: 11
Residential - (4 units/acre) to NMD
units (minimum) — 28 units (maximum)
Neighborhood Model District - residential (3
— 34 units/acre) mixed with commercial,
service and industrial uses. Between 11 and
28 residential units are proposed with a
density between 6 units/acre and 15
units/acre. A maximum of 6,000 non-
residential square footage is also requested.
DA (Development Area): Neighborhood 2
Comp. Plan Designation: Urban Density
of the Development Area of the Places29
Residential — residential (6.01 — 34 units/ acre);
Master Plan
supporting uses such as religious institutions,
schools, commercial, office and service uses
Affordable Housing Provided:
Affordable Housing AMI (%):
❑x Yes ❑No
Minimum 15 percent affordable units at 80 percent
AMI.
Character of Property: Existing single-
Use of Surrounding Properties: Directly adjacent
family detached structure and two storage
to this proposal to the east and north is the Dunlora
structures on a 1.947-acre parcel. Rear of
neighborhood. The Belvedere neighborhood is
property is partially wooded.
nearby to the north. Covenant Church is to the
west directly across Belvedere Boulevard. CATEC
ZMA201900001, 999 Rio Road
Planning Commission Public Hearing, January 14, 2020
and City Church are located across the street (Rio
Road E) to the south.
Factors Favorable:
Factors Unfavorable:
1. The rezoning request is consistent
1. None identified.
with the recommendations within the
Places29 Master Plan.
2. The request is consistent with the
majority of the applicable
Neighborhood Model Principles.
3. The proposed development extends
the existing multi -use path to
enhance pedestrian and bicycle
connectivity.
RECOMMENDATION:
Zoning Map Amendment: Based on the factors identified as favorable with this rezoning, staff
recommend approval of ZMA2019-1.
Modification Requests: Staff recommends approval (analysis in Attachment A5).
ZMA201900001, 999 Rio Road
Planning Commission Public Hearing, January 14, 2020
STAFF PERSON: Tori Kanellopoulos
PLANNING COMMISSION: January 14, 2020
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: March 4, 2020
PETITION:
PROJECT: ZMA201900001 — 999 Rio Road East
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Rio
TAX MAP/PARCELS: 06100-00-00-154BO
LOCATION: 999 Rio Road East, Charlottesville, VA 22901. Parcel is located at the
intersection of Rio Road East and Belvedere Boulevard.
PROPOSAL: Request to rezone the property from R-4 Residential to NMD Neighborhood
Model District to allow a mixed -use development with up to 28 residential units and small-
scale retail or professional office uses.
PETITION: Rezone 1.947 acres from R-4 Residential - (4 units/acre) to NMD Neighborhood
Model District - residential (3 — 34 units/acre) mixed with commercial, service and industrial
uses. Between 11 and 28 residential units are proposed with a density between 6 units/acre
and 15 units/acre. A maximum of 6,000 non-residential square footage is also requested.
Request for private street authorization per 14-233(A)(1); for variation of curb and gutter
requirement per 14-410(I); for variation of sidewalk requirement per 14-422(E); and for
variation of planting strip requirement per 14-422(F).
ZONING: R-4 Residential (4 units/acre)
OVERLAY DISTRICTS: Entrance Corridor, Airport Impact Area
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Urban Density Residential — residential (6.01 — 34 units/ acre);
supporting uses such as religious institutions, schools, commercial, office and service uses
in Neighborhood 2 of the Development Area of the Places29 Master Plan.
CHARACTER OF THE AREA
The subject property is located at the intersection of Rio Road East and Belvedere
Boulevard. The property is zoned R-4 Residential and contains an existing single-family
detached structure and two storage structures on 1.947 acres. The rear of property is
partially wooded. There are no environmental features on the site. (Attachment Al)
Directly adjacent to this proposal to the east and north is the Dunlora neighborhood. The
Belvedere neighborhood is nearby to the north. Covenant Church is to the west directly
across Belvedere Boulevard. CATEC and City Church are located across the street (Rio
Road E) to the south. Gasoline Alley is approximately 650 feet to the west on Rio Road.
SPECIFICS OF THE PROPOSAL
The applicant proposes to rezone 1.947 acres from R-4 Residential zoning district to
Neighborhood Model District (NMD) to allow up to 28 single-family attached, detached, and
multifamily units. Non-residential uses up to 6,000 square feet are also proposed for the site.
The development proposes two (2) Blocks: Block 1 will contain a mixture of non-residential
and residential uses and fronts along Rio Road; Block 2 will contain residential uses only
and is located at the rear of the site. Additional descriptions of the Blocks are provided
below.
ZMA201900001, 999 Rio Road
Planning Commission Public Hearing, January 14, 2020
Access to the site will be from two locations. There will be two entrances off of Belvedere
Boulevard; one for Block 1 and another for Block 2. These entrances must meet VDOT
spacing standards at the site planning stage.
Neighborhood -scale civic and open spaces are proposed, consisting of:
• An 8,364 square -foot area with a courtyard with landscaping and seating;
• An 8,276 square -foot area with a central greenspace, natural playscape, and a dog
park.
The proposal continues the extension of the multi -use path network along Rio Road and on
Belvedere Boulevard. This network eventually connects with the City of Charlottesville and
the Rivanna Trail.
Page 4 of the Application Plan (Attachment A3) shows the proposed layout and blocks of
the development. The Application Plan identifies the two (2) blocks in the development
which are described on Page 1 of the narrative (Attachment A7) and regulated in the COD,
including the Table of Uses for each block on Pages 1 and 2 of the COD. A minimum of 11
and a maximum of 28 units are proposed. A minimum of 500 square feet and a maximum of
6,000 square feet of non-residential uses are proposed.
The specific blocks, per the Code of Development (Attachment A2), are described as
follows:
Block 1: Block 1 will serve as the mixed -use and more intensive use block. It allows for a
mixture of uses, with up to 6,000 square feet of non-residential uses and between three (3)
and fourteen residential units. The ultimate mixture of uses and number of units will depend
on market demands. The limited permitted uses are intended to reflect the
Neighborhood/Community/Regional Retail and Office/R+D/Flex uses described in the
Places29 Master Plan. These uses are consistent with the secondary uses called for in the
Urban Density Residential designation (retail, commercial, office and institutional). This
block contains a courtyard with outdoor seating. It fronts on Rio Road and continues the
extension of the multi -use path.
Block 2: Block 2 is entirely residential with between eight (8) and 14 single-family attached
and/or detached units. This block contains a central green area and a dog park.
The applicant has also submitted a request for a private street and a request for a variation
or exception to the requirements for curb and gutter, sidewalks and planting strips in order to
provide amenity -oriented lots in Block 2. These requests in an NMD zoning district must be
approved by the Commission. Staff recommends approval of these requests, as outlined in
Attachment A5.
APPLICANT'S JUSTIFICATION FOR THE REQUEST
The applicant has provided a detailed request found in Attachment A7.
ZMA201900001, 999 Rio Road
Planning Commission Public Hearing, January 14, 2020
4
COMMUNITY MEETING
The required community meeting was held on March 28t", 2019, at 6:00 PM in Room 235 of
the Albemarle County Office Building, during the regularly scheduled Places29 Rio CAC
meeting. The applicant has also met with residents of Fowler Ridge Court and the
Shephard's Ridge Homeowners' Association. The primary concern at the community
meeting was traffic and the existing issues at the intersection of Rio Road and Belvedere
Boulevard. The applicant discussed their conversations with VDOT and coordination on
right-of-way dedication as needed. VDOT and County Transportation Planning staff did not
have significant traffic concerns with this proposal. There was also concern about the
proposed scale of Block 1 and proposed inclusion of non-residential uses in Block 1, with
general agreement that the proposed scale of Block 2 was appropriate. The applicant has
since revised the scale of Block 1. The analysis of proposed uses is included in the
`Comprehensive Plan', `Neighborhood Model' (Attachment A4) and `Anticipated impact on
nearby and surrounding properties' sections in this Staff Report.
The applicant held a second community meeting with the Places29 Rio CAC on December
5, 2019. This second community meeting was not required. A summary of the discussion is
included below under `Anticipated impact on nearby and surrounding properties'.
PLANNING AND ZONING HISTORY
There is no previous planning and zoning history on this site.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The Comprehensive Plan identifies this property as Urban Density Residential in the
Places29 Master Plan. This classification calls for primary uses to consist of residential uses
at gross densities between 6.01-34 dwelling units/acre. Secondary uses in this classification
include supporting uses such as religious institutions, schools, commercial, office and
service uses. The Master Plan calls for these uses to be located in Centers, or located
outside of Centers by exception. Although the site is not located within a Center, it is located
within one -tenth of a mile of three (3) Neighborhood Service Centers. One of these centers
will contain the future senior center at Belvedere, which is an institutional use. Additionally,
Belvedere's Code of Development permits small-scale office and commercial uses in
locations designated Urban Density Residential. The development already contains a
professional office in this designation. Nearly all of the Neighborhood Service Centers
designated in the Places29 Master Plan area are adjacent to Urban Density Residential
designations, indicating opportunities for transitioning to higher intensity uses. The Brookhill
development, also within the Places29 Master Plan, includes regulations in its Code of
Development for the Urban Density Residential designations, which include both residential
and non-residential uses, such as professional offices, outdoor eating establishments and
retail. Also, this particular site is located along a major street and is not located internally to
a neighborhood. Finally, it is a requirement of the Neighborhood Model District to provide a
mixture of uses with at least two general use classifications (18-20.8); a special exception is
needed if this requirement is not met. Therefore, staff feels it is an appropriate location for
small-scale non-residential uses, and that the proposed rezoning from R-4 Residential to
Neighborhood Model District is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan land use
recommendations. The proposal also continues the multi -use path that is shown in the
ZMA201900001, 999 Rio Road
Planning Commission Public Hearing, January 14, 2020
5
Places29 Master Plan. A description of the land use designation and an overview map is
provided below:
1094 1 15 C 2 212127 t�D \2129 0 362
1067
61 •147 2319�/Q� 356 104
61 •i 48 6. \2120
0 i 611083
0 3 C2121 13 231:0 3345
350
o�'v 2112 844 1034
329
ssa 6 -7 S 2Y10 1 `�C 339 1028 10
1 61-51A She 2F-1
J Pherds'[L�� 332
1061 302 308l ry 326
320 2F-73022 1025
23 fi2F-146
5 LL RF-121
1016
J �62F-281 421 vu fi2F-145
2050 415 oe
° .� 8,• ;`� 20 FOB 2 -A
62F-279• �
`� 6�/fi -454p /�/ 2038 403 OF-112 62F705
P /
99 1P 998 1007 1296 1
bry4\364 62F2- 4h_' 2008 s2F- 1001 1290 gdrt
\` 34 (i. RNd Rl- �Tr s2F-1Ja/s fizi
h S
]635\ 1622 h�Oe Ro J 995 985 62F507 62F-95 -
t 1624 J+,2009 1111
1:4 1623 1612 ! 23 2003 /�� 62F-10 965
J a t�/ /•� ��'!'�' 62F-49 6'
J l 3 4ti 1529 1000 ,yh�a 975 960 955
-Ol 1548`�ry Isis 6,y4 0•F
1541 1224 980 O 965 9529.
h1 -1 3 ti qo 15 1547 62F•24
1040 Y 62F2.6 1228• 970 ~ 955 944
CAT6C
�fi1 u167B 1221 960 ` 62F-45 62F-52/
fi2F26 =_ ._
Urban Density Residential. This designation is used in areas around Centers where multifamily
housing with a gross density range between 6.01 and 34 units per acre is desired. It is also applied
to existing residential areas with densities within this range (see Land Use Table LU2). This
designation is essentially the same as the Urban Density Residential designation in the 1996 Land
Use Plan.
Primary uses: multifamily and single-family residential, including two or more housing
types.
Secondary uses: retail, commercial, and office uses that support the neighborhood,
live/work units, open space, and institutional uses. Retail, commercial, office, and
institutional uses are encouraged to locate in Centers so they are accessible to residents
throughout the surrounding area, and so they benefit from co -location with other
neighborhood -serving businesses. However, they may be located by exception in areas
around Centers designated Urban Density Residential provided they are compatible with
surrounding uses.
The Neighborhood Model: Staff has reviewed the proposal against the Neighborhood
Model Principles and found that it is consistent with the majority of the principles. The
application does not fully meet some aspects of the relegated parking principle. The detailed
Neighborhood Model Analysis can be found in Attachment A4.
Relationship between the application and the intent and purposes of the requested
zoning district:
ZMA201900001, 999 Rio Road
Planning Commission Public Hearing, January 14, 2020
6
The purpose and intent of the Neighborhood Model District (NMD) zoning district is to:
• Provide for compact, mixed -use developments
• Integrate diversified uses within close proximity to each other within the development
areas identified in the Comprehensive Plan
• Incorporate principles of traditional neighborhood development, such as pedestrian
orientation and a mixture of uses
The NMD is intended to be a flexible zoning district to allow development consistent with the
goals of the Future Land Use Plans in the Master Plans and the Neighborhood Model
Principles. The form and content of this proposal is consistent with the intent of the NMD. A
variety of housing types and non-residential uses provide an appropriately -scaled mixture of
uses and residential units.
Anticipated impact on public facilities and services:
Streets:
Belvedere Boulevard provides the sole means of road access to the subject property, with
two entrances proposed that will need to meet VDOT standards. The property fronts along
Rio Road, however there will be no access from Rio Road. The proposal continues the
multi -use path along Rio Road and Belvedere Boulevard, which is called for in the Places29
Master Plan.
One of the primary concerns residents expressed during the community meeting was the
additional traffic that would be generated by this development. Residents were concerned
about the already congested intersection of Belvedere Boulevard and Rio Road, and the
overall traffic on Rio Road and the John Warner Parkway. Given the scale and number of
units proposed with this application, it did not meet the threshold for a Traffic Impact
Analysis (TIA). The applicant completed a traffic study, which estimated between 62 and 73
vehicular trips during peak hour, assuming maximum build out (that is, the maximum
number of residential units and maximum retail/office space permitted per the COD).
Transportation Planning staff concur with these estimates. This increase is not high enough
to warrant off -site road improvements. However, the applicant has stated that they will
coordinate with VDOT and dedicate the right-of-way needed for future improvements. VDOT
is continuing their study of this intersection and is in the process of proposing an
improvement, likely in the form of an R-Cut.
Internally, the site will be served by two entrances and travelways. The size of the site does
not allow for a more extensive street network, and the Places29 Master Plan does not call
for new public streets within this site. The applicant is also proposing amenity -oriented lots
that would front on a private street without curb and gutter or sidewalks, which would have
landscaping and likely pervious pavers. This modified private street (amenity space) would
also serve as access for Fire and Rescue. This design has been approved with previous
developments, such as Riverside Village.
Although it is County policy to create interconnected street networks, residents at Fowler
Ridge Court preferred to not have a connection at this time. A right of way adjacent to the
property was dedicated with deed book 2015 page 3 to provide eventual interconnectivity
with Shepherds Ridge Road for emergency access. This access parcel is now County-
ZMA201900001, 999 Rio Road
Planning Commission Public Hearing, January 14, 2020
7
owned and is in between Fowler Ridge Court and this property. A full connection from the
property to Fowler Ridge Court would require County land to be used. The applicant's
design does not allow for a future vehicular connection, however it does allow for a future
pedestrian connection. The applicant states that they will need to acquire an ACSA
easement on the County -owned parcel, which would also provide an opportunity for a
location for a pedestrian path. The applicant met with residents of Fowler Ridge Court and
the Shepherds Ridge HOA, who expressed their preference to not have a connection at this
time (vehicular or pedestrian). A road is not shown in this location in the Comprehensive
Plan, and Staff does not recommend a vehicular connection, given the site constraints and
preference of existing residents. While a pedestrian connection would provide enhanced
connectivity, residents in the adjacent neighborhood can still use the multi -use path along
Rio Road to access this development. The applicant may choose to provide a pedestrian
connection in the future.
Schools:
Students living in this area would attend Agnor-Hurt Elementary School, Burley Middle
School, and Albemarle High School. Albemarle County Public Schools have provided
calculations that estimate how many students will be generated at each school level by
housing type. The table below specifies the yield of students generated at each school level
should the subject property be built out to the maximum number of dwelling units.
Dwelling Type
Elementary
Middle
High
Total
Single family
6.9
3.7
5.5
16
detached
Single family
3.6
1.38
2.22
7.2
attached
The school system has provided annual estimates of student enrollment at all three schools
over the next ten academic years. Of these three schools, only Albemarle High School is
projected to exceed capacity. As the Places29 Master Plan is fully realized, growth must be
closely monitored since Albemarle High schools does not have the long-term capacity to
support additional residential growth expected in this part of the County. However,
dedication of land for two new elementary schools are proffered commitments of other large
developments in the Places29 Development Area. This includes a 7-acre site within
Brookhill and a 12.85-acre site within North Pointe. The Brookhill development also has a
proffer requiring dedication of an approximately 60-acre site along Berkmar Drive that could
be used for a comprehensive public high school.
Fire and Rescue:
The proposal is not expected to create new demands on Fire and Rescue services. Two
points of access along Belvedere Boulevard are proposed. Fire and Rescue has not
identified any issues with adequate access and water availability at this time, which will also
be reviewed at the site planning stage and will have to meet Fire and Rescue requirements.
Fire and Rescue has reviewed this rezoning application and has no objection to the
proposal.
Utilities:
ZMA201900001, 999 Rio Road
Planning Commission Public Hearing, January 14, 2020
This project is in the Albemarle County Service Authority (ACSA) water and sewer service
jurisdictional area. ACSA and RWSA did not identify any capacity issues with this proposal
and public water and sewer are available to the property. The distance to the nearest sewer
line is approximately 300 feet, and ACSA has expressed no concerns about this rezoning
application.
Anticipated impact on environmental, cultural and historic resources:
There are no known environmental, cultural or historic resources on this site. There are no
steep slopes on the site, and any increase in stormwater runoff will be reviewed by County
Engineering staff during the site planning stage of the project. Stormwater facilities will be
designed in accordance with the Virginia Stormwater Management Program (VSMP)
regulations administered by the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ).
Anticipated impact on nearby and surrounding properties:
At the first Community Meeting for this project, members of the community expressed
concern with potential impacts of this development on surrounding properties and the
community. These issues are summarized below, with staff comments in italics. Note that
significant changes to the application have been made since this first community meeting,
including reducing the maximum density by 40 percent:
Additional traffic generated by this development will further strain the existing
intersection of Rio Road and Belvedere Boulevard, where it is often very difficult to
exit (especially turning left).
The applicant stated that they delayed submittal of this application to have more time to
coordinate with VDOT. VDOT has been studying this intersection and is in the process of
designing a proposal. The applicant stated that they will continue to work with VDOT and
dedicate the right-of-way as needed for improvements. As of this time, VDOT has
preliminarily endorsed a Restricted Crossing U-Turn (R-Cut), which would occur further
down Rio Road. An R-CUT would prohibit left turns out of Belvedere Boulevard and
instead redirect traffic to designated locations along Rio Road where U-Turns can be
made.
The applicant's traffic analysis on Page 10 of the narrative assumes between 108 and
151 trips during peak hours generated with this development [Note: this has been
reduced to 62 to 73 trips during peak hours with the current application]. The total
number of annual average daily traffic (AADT) for 2017 on Rio Road East was 28,000.
VDOT and County Transportation Planning staff did not have objection to this proposal.
The number of vehicle trips per day generated by this proposal did not meet VDOT
requirements for a Traffic Impact Analysis.
• The scale of Block 1, especially building height/number of stories, is not consistent
with the character of this area.
After the community meeting, the applicant revised the COD and changed the maximum
number of stories from four (4) to three (3). This building height is within the Places29
Master Plan recommendation of a maximum of four (4) stories for residential and office
ZMA201900001, 999 Rio Road
Planning Commission Public Hearing, January 14, 2020
uses and three (3) stories for retail and commercial uses. [Note: the maximum height for
non-residential uses has now been reduced to one (1) story with the current application].
The Places29 Master Plan calls for a maximum building footprint of 5, 000 square feet for
retail -only buildings in Urban Density Residential designations. Adjacent existing
residential units on Fowler Ridge Court have building footprints of approximately 2,100 to
2,500 square feet. Therefore, the building footprints within Block 1 are approximately the
size of two single-family homes.
Additionally, the applicant has coordinated with residents of Fowler Ridge Court and the
Shepherd's Ridge Homeowners' Association. Residents were concerned about potential
sight impacts, especially from parking and loading spaces or dumpsters. The applicant
has proposed to allow Fowler Ridge Court residents and the HOA to participate in
selecting additional screening measures, which would meet or exceed the Zoning
Ordinance requirements in 18-32.7.9.7.
• Commercial uses may not be appropriate for this area.
Some residents have expressed concern over the potential non-residential uses
proposed with this application. The Places29 Master Plan calls for the following
secondary uses in the Urban Density Residential designation: "retail, commercial, and
office uses that support the neighborhood, live/work units, open space, and institutional
uses. Retail, commercial, office, and institutional uses are encouraged to locate in
Centers so they are accessible to residents throughout the surrounding area, and so
they benefit from co -location with other neighborhood -serving businesses. However, they
may be located by exception in areas around Centers designated Urban Density
Residential provided they are compatible with surrounding uses. " Although the site is not
located within a Center, it is located within one -tenth of a mile of three (3) Neighborhood
Service Centers. Additionally, this site is located along the major street Rio Road, and is
not located internally to a neighborhood. With the continuation of the multi -use path,
there are more opportunities for walking and biking to a variety of uses. Additionally, the
Neighborhood Model Zoning District requires a mixture of both residential and non-
residential uses. Therefore, staff feels it is an appropriate location for small-scale non-
residential uses that are consistent with the Places29 Master Plan and the NMD
requirement. [Note: the current application significantly reduced the range of permitted
non-residential uses].
At the second Community Meeting for this project, held on December 5, 2019, members of
the community expressed some concern with potential impacts of this development on
surrounding properties and the community. These issues are summarized below, with staff
comments in italics:
• There were mixed comments on the non-residential component of this application.
Some community members expressed the desire to have no non-residential uses on
this property, while others felt it had been appropriately scaled back.
Staff's analysis on the non-residential component of this application remains the same.
The applicant has revised both the permitted non-residential uses and the scale of those
ZMA201900001, 999 Rio Road
Planning Commission Public Hearing, January 14, 2020
10
uses since the Board of Supervisors public hearing on 09118119. The previous maximum
non-residential square footage was 10,000 and has now been reduced to 6,000. Non-
residential buildings have been reduced in height from a maximum of three stories to a
maximum of one story. The only permitted non-residential uses are now a furniture store
and office uses.
• There were also mixed comments on the traffic concerns for this project. Some
community members felt that traffic is still a significant concern, while others felt that
the project had been scaled back and therefore helped address traffic concerns.
The applicant has reduced the maximum density of the application by 40 percent and
reduced the maximum square footage of non-residential uses by 40 percent. Therefore,
staffs analysis of the traffic impacts of this application remain the same. The applicant
stated that they have continued to meet with VDOT, however this proposal does not
generate enough trips to show up in VDOT's traffic models. Transportation planning staff
concurred with the updated trip counts provided by the applicant.
Public need and justification for the change:
The County's growth management policy states that new residential development should
occur in the designated Development Areas where infrastructure and services are provided,
rather than in the Rural Area. This proposal is within one -tenth of a mile of three (3) Centers
and is located approximately two-thirds of a mile away from the rural areas boundary.
Providing a mixed -use development at this location could provide residents the opportunity
to walk or bike to small-scale neighborhood uses, with the potential for live -work
opportunities depending on if office uses are ultimately included in the development.
PROFFERS
There are no proffers proposed with this application.
Request for Variation or Exception: Private Street Authorization, Curb and Gutter,
Sidewalks, and Planting Strips
The applicant has requested the following variations or exceptions: private street
authorization per 14-233(A)(1); variation of curb and gutter requirement per 14-410(I);
variation of sidewalk requirement per 14-422(E); and variation of planting strip requirement
per 14-422(F). Staff recommends approval of these variation requests, to allow for amenity -
oriented lots in Block 2. See Attachment A5 for staff's full analysis.
SUMMARY
Staff has identified the following factors which are favorable to this request:
1. The rezoning request is consistent with the recommendations within the Places29
Master Plan.
2. The request is consistent with the majority of the applicable Neighborhood Model
Principles.
3. The proposed development extends the existing multi -use path to enhance pedestrian
and bicycle connectivity.
ZMA201900001, 999 Rio Road
Planning Commission Public Hearing, January 14, 2020
11
Staff has identified the following factors which are unfavorable to this request:
1. None identified.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the factors identified as favorable with this rezoning, staff recommends approval
of ZMA2019-1.
PLANNING COMMISSION POSSIBLE MOTIONS for ZMA2019-1:
A. Should a Planning Commissioner choose to recommend approval of this zoning map
amendment:
Move to recommend approval of ZMA201900001, 999 Rio Road.
B. Should a Planning Commissioner choose to recommend denial of this zoning map
amendment:
Move to recommend denial of ZMA201900001, 999 Rio Road (state reasons for
denial).
PLANNING COMMISSION POSSIBLE MOTIONS FOR MODIFICATIONS:
A. Should a Planning Commissioner choose to recommend approval of the modifications
listed in Attachment A5:
Move to recommend approval of the modifications for ZMA201900001 as listed in
Attachment A5.
B. Should a Planning Commissioner choose to recommend denial of the modifications:
Move to recommend denial of the modifications for ZMA 201900001 listed in
Attachment A5 (state reasons for denial).
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A1: Vicinity Map
Attachment A2: Code of Development, dated December 16, 2019
Attachment A3: Application Plan, dated December 16, 2019
Attachment A4: Staff Analysis of Neighborhood Model Principles
Attachment A5: Staff Analysis of Request for Modifications: Private Street Authorization and
Variations to Curb and Gutter, Sidewalks and Planting Strips
Attachment A6: Applicant Modification Request
Attachment AT Applicant Justification
Attachment A8: Applicant Narrative Supplement
ZMA201900001, 999 Rio Road
Planning Commission Public Hearing, January 14, 2020
12