HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP200500096 Review Comments Minor Amendment 2006-12-19Short Review Comments Report for:
SDP200500096 —[Dennis Enterprises - Major Amendment
SubApplication Type: MinorAmendment
Date Completed:
09/30/2005
Reviewer:
Steve Tuqwell
Review Status:
Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
.................................................................................................................................................................................
Date Completed:
09/20/2005
Reviewer:
Max Greene
Review Status:
Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
.................................................................................................................................................................................
Date Completed:
10/24/2005
Reviewer:
James Barber
Review Status:
No Objection
Reviews Comments:
Division: Planner Z&CD
Division: CDD Current Development
Division: Fire Rescue
Approval is subject to field inspection and verification.
Date Completed:
10/21/2005
Reviewer:
Margaret Maliszewski
Review Status:
Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed:
.......
01/26/2006
Reviewer:
Margaret Maliszewski
Review Status:
Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed:
01/27/2006
Reviewer:
Steve Tuqwell
Review Status:
Pending
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed:
02/06/2006
Reviewer:
Glenn Brooks
Review Status:
Pending
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed:
05/03/2006
Reviewer:
Glenn Brooks
Review Status:
Pending
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed:
05/12/2006
Reviewer:
Steve Tuqwell
Review Status:
Pending
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed:
05/19/2006
Page: 1 of 3
Division: CDD ARB
Division: CDD ARB
Division: Planner Z&CD
Division: CDD Current Development
Division: CDD Current Development
Division: Planner Z&CD
County of Albemarle
Printed On: April 15, 2020
Reviewer:
Steve Tuqwell
Division:
Planner Z&CD
Review Status:
Pending
Reviews Comments:
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Date Completed:
07/07/2006
Reviewer:
Mark Chambers
Division:
CDD Current Development
Review Status:
Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Date Completed:
07/25/2006
Reviewer:
Margaret Maliszewski
Division:
CDD ARB
Review Status:
Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed:
09/22/2006
Reviewer:
Margaret Maliszewski
Division:
CDD ARB
Review Status:
Approved
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed:
10/30/2006
Reviewer:
Max Greene
Division:
CDD Current Development
Review Status:
Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed:
12/05/2006
Reviewer:
Max Greene
Division:
CDD Current Development
Review Status:
Pending
Reviews Comments:
The SWM Plans still do not appear to address the detention requirements set forth in previous
approvals. Please show how the site detention will be addressed.
Date Completed: 12/14/2006
Reviewer: Glenn Brooks Division: CDD Current Development
Review Status: Administrative Approval
Reviews Comments:
John,
Thank you for the resubmittal of the Dennis Enterprises plans, which engineering received yesterday.
I picked this up quickly, because I know the Minetos are incurring fines, and I don't want the County
to be responsible for time delays. Your package included a detailed MS-19 computation, and I'm not
sure why, but I have no problem with it. When I looked over the correspondence from Max, I did not
find that this was requested. However, the last few exchanges appear to be by e-mail, so maybe I
missed something. I wish to copy all the folks involved, so I am sending you this last correspondence
by e-mail also.
As I see it, with this revision we appear to have a plan that reasonably reflects field conditions. From
the stormwater management perspective, there is a portion of the site that used to be treated by the
basin at the rear of the site, but is not anymore. It appears from your exchanges with Max that you
contend this change was due to a letter of revision that changed the drainage pattern on the site, and
which County officials approved (ignorant of the ramifications). Furthermore, it is solely the County's
responsibility to ensure that approved changes do not detrimentally affect other aspects of the site. I
think I understand this perspective. You have proposed a filterra to provided water quality filtration for
part of the subject area. None of the lost area is proposed to be re -captured for detention, but it is
not all that large. I believe this clarifies the situation for future reference. Let me know if you have a
different conclusion.
I am approving this plan for engineering. I am copying David Pennock, so he can sign the site plan
amendment, provided all other departments and agencies have also approved the plan.
Page: 2 of 3
County of Albemarle Printed On: April 15, 2020
Have a Merry Christmas.
Date Completed:
Reviewer:
Review Status:
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed:
Reviewer:
Review Status:
Reviews Comments:
Glenn Brooks, P.E.
Senior Engineer
Albemarle County
12/19/2006
David Pennock
Administrative Approval
09/07/2007
David Pennock
Denied
Division: Planner Z&CD
Division: Planner Z&CD
dust be submitted as minor amendment. Notified John Grady (531-1118) and Tim Miller (979-8121)
)n 9/7/07.
Page: 3 of 3 County of Albemarle Printed On: April 15, 2020