Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWPO201800027 Calculations 2020-05-11MARTHA JEFFERSON HOSPITAL APARTMENTS STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CALCULATIONS PACKET (AMENDMENT #1 TO WPO 201800027) Date of Calculations APRIL 22, 2020 PREPARED BY: COLLINS ENGINEERING 200 GARRETT STREET, SUITE K CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 434.293.3719 PH 434.293.2813 FX www.collins-engineering.com SCS TR-55 Calculations The proposed 'Martha Jefferson Hospital Presidio Apartments' final site plan (SDP201900075) is in general conformance with this project's original VSMP approval (WPO 201800027) with one major exception. Subarea B was modified and no longer proposes an underground detention system. To compensate for this removal, the approved dry detention cell has been enlarged with this amendment and calculations have been provided showing continued stormwater quantity compliance for subarea B. APPROVED Subarea A Summary: Subarea A ( ) drains to a Level II wet pond that provides stormwater quality and quantity treatment. The 1-, 2-, 10- and 100-year design storm routings can be viewed in the ✓IJH Apartments- Level 11 Wet Pond documents. Channel protection for subarea A is met through 9VAC25-870-66, subsection B.3.a. The limits of the channel protection analysis end at the wet pond since subdivision 3 of the aforementioned subsection is utilized. Flood protection is met through 9VAC25-870-66, subsection C.2.b. The limits of the flood protection analysis ends at the wet pond's outfall since section C.2.b is met. AMENDED Subarea B Summary: Subarea B ( ) drains to a dry detention cell that provides stormwater quantity treatment. The 1-, 2-, 10- and 100-year design storm routings can be viewed in the MJH Apartments- Detention Cell Routings documents. Channel protection for subarea B is met through 9VAC25-870-66, subsection B.3.a. The limits of the channel protection analysis end at the dry detention cell since subdivision 3 of the aforementioned subsection is utilized. Flood protection is met through 9VAC25-870-66, subsection C.2.a. The limits of the flood protection analysis ends at the dry detention cell's outfall, where the stormwater conveyance system enters a mapped floodplain. 0 APPROVED Soils Table (Source: NRCS Web Soil Survey Online Database) Albemarle County. Virginia (VA0031 Albemarle County, Virginia (VA003) Map Unit Map Unit Name Percent of A0I symbol 23C Davidson clay 1.811/0 loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes 59❑ Myersville very 8.811/0 stony silt loam, 15to25 percent slopes 71❑ Rabun clay 0.6% loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes 72C3 Rabun clay, 7 24.1% to 15 percent slopes, severely eroded 72D3 Rabun clay, 15 18.60/a to 25 percent slopes, severely eroded 73❑ Rabun very 18.60/0 stony clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes 73E Rabun very 26.70/6 stony clay loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes 89B Unison silt 0.40/6 loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes W Water 0.30/6 Totals for Area of 100.00/0 Interest Note: The NRCS web soil survey has catorgized this parcel's soil types as predominantley having hydrologic group types of B. APPROVED Precipitation Data (Source: NOAA's National Weather Service, Hydrometerorological Design Studies Center, Atlas 14 Point Precipitation Frequency Estimates) slap ❑� Terrain f� ryp f4l�5' T �31�r 4�i r cc $r'! Sy �i�nl•'t•'rJ r i f sr f ro� ti ,y �7 M O�f6S GTctiK 1-9 ,,pr ES 0,4km 2ini POINT PRECIPITATION FREQUENCY (PF) ESTIMATES WITH WX3 CONFIDENCE INTERVALS AND SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 2, Version 3 e d PDS-based precipitation frequency estimates with 90% confidence intervals (in inches)' Average recurrence interval (years) Duration 500 �� 7 2 5 7D 25 50 100 2D0 10D0 24-hr 3.02 3.65 d.66 5.52 6.78 7.87 9.07 70.4 12.4 94.7 (2 71-3 39) [3 28-4.10] (4.18-5 24) (4 92-6 18) [6 N-7 57] (6 93A 76) (7 92-10 1 } [8 98-713] [10 5-73 7] (71 8-15 6} O O O O N \ N a a w o_ � v l7 cc LL Nw > o CD m X N � w w n O N �6 N N 00 0 V > N lD ci N U -6 u w = O L �O N lD m 0) E(6 l0 O l0 'T 00 M 00 3 0 � Y Y z 0 u Z U 0 v Y M M Cl N io rn d- N N N c' m N O o0 u Q Sri cr m o o �^ rl m o m 6 x c c N N m m O a m N N lD In lD O O O Dl 0 0 N O Il i Q Q O lD N m O N-i m 0 c-i N I, 6 �4 O N 00 O m O N V O N m O N Z W N lD c-i W M lD CO N .--i c� m N CO iD m in CO a)N lD Y O C .- u O1 � O_ C O O Y p _O .� .--. ..-. O O O' > O > V E V O V p p p C C O O V 7 O O O N_0 a) (� w L p t t O o 0 C v m N m N v m >p v v n O v O n O O U Q c �n O Q c �n O c O ,O .O 0 Uw U w O U o 0 O YOaJ? iQN "6 L "6 L "6 -0ovoovopo viL o a o pUN o pU O Q O p o ON o(D O (D 0 O O- C O .� O- C O .� O .� C w i O Q L N W Op C L N W p C L N> p N .- p U w Oj N w Oj O N OJ O O/ C CL O N E> [0 > a E > E > v O x ? p L 0) 'O O_ c n m m m 6 Q Q E 3 � C � — DA O N O i O L OW OW .--. Q .O nJ Q > Q n/ > con/ > Q LU > 0 co 11) ,O.L 0Q0 oo Q oQ ZQ o v o v 0- o a g o Q d D_ d Q D_ Q Q R O > O N 2 O D_ H a 0J � CO Q CO 0 0 v a Q o 0 in w w own > > p m C: O Of O cr Z w �C E O N O N tD 0) I, w w In -i co m } O E O N Ln N O � 4 i N lD lD -! O 6 M O N N 0) } N E O N N lD lD 00 'y O M In -:T m M O 0J } 0) s 0 i O an 0) an O1 v) t ? N C C C T V C 3 O O 0 S % C C C LL 6 0 7 K 7 I 0_ 7 I c: U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service TR 55 Worksheet 3: Time of Concentration (Tc) or Travel Time (Tt) Project: Martha Jefferson Hospital Apartments Location: Peter Jefferson Parkway Check One: Present X Developed X Check One: Tc X Tt Segment ID Sheet Flow: (Applicable to Tc only) Designed By: FGM, PE Checked By: SRC, PE Through subarea n/a Date: Date: FL-ENG-21A 06/04 4/22/2020 n /-)-) /-)n-in APPROVED APPRO, AMENDED DA A DA B DAP DA B (Pre-Dev.) (Pre-Dev.) (Post-Dev.) 1 Surface description (Table 3-1) Dense Grass Dense Grass 2 Manning's roughness coeff., n (Table 3-1 0.24 0.24 3 Flow length, L (total L < 100) (ft) 100 100 4 Two-year 24-hour rainfall, PZ (in.) 3.7 3.7 5 Land slope, s (ft/ft) 0.19 0.16 6 Compute Tt = [0.007(n*L)08] / PZoS s°4 0.09 0.10 Shallow Concentrated Flow: 7 Surface description (paved or unpaved) Unpaved Unpaved 8 Flow Length, L (ft) 775 635 9 Watercourse slope, s (ft/ft) 0.108 0.110 10 Average velocity, V (Figure 3-1) (ft/s) 5.2 5.3 11 Tt = L / 3600*V 0.04 0.03 Channel Flow: 12 Cross sectional flow area, a (ft) 13 Wetted perimeter, PN, (ft) 14 Hydraulic radius, r = a/PW (ft) 15 Channel Slope, s (ft/ft) 16 Manning's Roughness Coeff, n 17 V= [ 1.49r2/3so 5 ) / n 18 Flow length, L (ft) 19 Tt= L / 3600*V 20 Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (Add Tt in steps 6, 11 and 19) 0.10 (AMENDED) Note: The most conservative post -development SCS Tc is 0.10 hrs. a) U v Q1 C L J ; L U a) a o w v O a) c v � E o a) O cc a) � Q L :D Z O o 0 0 N N N N N (N Q) Q) Q Q w a LU a U' LL Ln 5. 5. m m C O 1u Y u O U L o v Q o a) a L ca C vUi '@ v L Q Q N Ln O T Il O O 00 n l0 LO 00 c0 00 ui O O ri M O N Q O a1 Q LU > in m 0 0000 M O Ln C)ri O ri ri 00 Z < O ryi ri = O N LD -1: c-I O O r-I 00 Cc V of u-j� Q O 00 O M O O r N 14 v O Q Q N O M Ln 00 O r-I O r-I n ri M (yi O O ri p �'1 O c6 7 O Q O ;_, a) Q y > a) Q Q o_ o taoL Q O — O _ u 2 p Q N y'1 ri r 'n N —i O Q O I v Q > m v :D Q Q Q v O - C:) C n L L Q Q > m � O _ i � O c-1 Q O L > Q' � Q I?rmi i O i C Q Q O = i M ri C C u 1 i O cC v o L Q n Q w In C) L O u N Q) NII II (0 O II u u + a) E E Z H O Ci O U C O O a Y = N v L O on O M o- fl_ w CJ Ci c`o ca a c° E ; N o Q 0 3 ° Q ns v a3i ro s a � N v 3 +, Y a) O U— OV "a -0 O C t a) 3— — Q O >? a) Q m IQ Cf tl0 l6 w O -Fa M cr C � E C 0 N— -O O N •r0 O O O O a! L Q E Ll a' u o' a s ri Q t0 0C 0° d +L+ I I N I m 14 1 Lf1 1l6 1 I-� I o6l Q1 3 WATERSHED SUMMARY APPROVED Subarea A AMENDED Subarea B AMENDED DA B (Post-Dev. 1-year Flow, 2-year Flow, 10-year Flow, CN Area, ac. cfs cfs cfs CN Area, ac. 1-year Flow, 2-year Flow, 10-year Flow, cfs cfs cfs 83.3 5.69 0.30 4.81 20.86 i otai Area Summary Pre -Development DA A & B 11.71 ac. Post -Development DA A & B 11.71 ac. 9 VAC 25-870-66 APPROVED Subarea A Section B: Channel Protection "Concentrated stormwater flow shall be released into a stormwater conveyance system and shall meet the criteria in subdivision 1, 2 or 3 of this subsection..." Section B.1: Manmade stormwater conveyance systems "When stormwater from a development is discharged to a manmade stormwater conveyance system, following the land -disturbing activity, either..." a. or b. shall be met: Section 13.1.1b. "The peak discharge requirements for concentrated stormwater flow to natural stormwater conveyance systems in subdivision 3 of this subsection shall be met." Section B.3 "When stormwater from a development is discharged to a natural stormwater conveyance system, the maximum peak flow rate from the one-year 24-hour storm following the land - disturbing activity shall be calculated either..." a. or b." Section B.3.a. In accordance with the following methodology: Q Developed _< I•F (Q Pre -Developed RV Pre -Developed) RV Developed Q Allowed _< 1.12 cfs Q Developed < 0.92 cfs (From Routings) Section B.4 Limits of Analysis Where: Q Pre -Developed - 4.49 cfs CN Pre -Developed- 64.2 S Pre -Developed - 5.57 RV Pre -Developed - 0.49 In. CN Post -Developed- 84.4 S Post -Developed - 1.85 RV Post -Developed - 1.56 In. The analysis terminates at the SWM facility since "...subdivision 3 of this subsection is utiilzed to shown compliance with the channel protection criteria..." 9 VAC 25-870-66 APPROVED Subarea A Section C: Flood Protection "Concentrated stormwater flow shall be released into a stormwater conveyance system and shall meet one of the following criteria as demonstrated by use of acceptable hydrologic and hydraulic methodologies:" Section C.2.b.: The point of discharge "releases a postdevelopment peak flow rate for the 10-year 24-hour storm event that is less than the predevelopment peak flow rate from the 10-year 24-hour storm event. Downstream stormwater conveyance systems do not require any additional analysis to show compliance with flood protection criteria if this option is utilized." Section C.3 Limits of Analysis The analysis terminates at the proposed SWM facility since subsection C.2.b is met. 9 VAC 25-870-66 AMENDED Subarea B Section B: Channel Protection "Concentrated stormwater flow shall be released into a stormwater conveyance system and shall meet the criteria in subdivision 1, 2 or 3 of this subsection..." Section B.1: Manmade stormwater conveyance systems "When stormwater from a development is discharged to a manmade stormwater conveyance system, following the land -disturbing activity, either..." a. or b. shall be met: Section B.1.b. "The peak discharge requirements for concentrated stormwater flow to natural stormwater conveyance systems in subdivision 3 of this subsection shall be met." Section B.3 "When stormwater from a development is discharged to a natural stormwater conveyance system, the maximum peak flow rate from the one-year 24-hour storm following the land - disturbing activity shall be calculated either..." a. or b." Section B.3.a. In accordance with the following methodology: QAllowed _'5- I•F• (Q Pre -Developed RV Pre -Developed) RV Developed QAllowed < 0.30 cfs Where (AMENDED) Q Developed < 0.30 cfs Q Pre -Developed - 1.55 cfs CN Pre -Developed- 60.6 S Pre -Developed - 6.50 RV Pre -Developed - 0.36 in. CN Post -Developed- 83.3 S Post -Developed - 2.01 RV Post -Developed- 1.48 in. 9 VAC 25-870-66 AMENDED Subarea B Section C: Flood Protection "Concentrated stormwater flow shall be released into a stormwater conveyance system and shall meet one of the following criteria as demonstrated by use of acceptable hydrologic and hydraulic methodologies:" Section C.2.a.: The point of discharge (the dry detention cell), "confines the postdevelopment peak flow rate from the 10-year 24-hour storm event within the stormwater conveyance system to avoid the localized flooding." Section C.3.c Limits of Analysis The flood protection analysis terminates at the site outfall because, "the stormwater conveyance system enters a mapped floodplain." APPROVED Level II Wet Pond Calculations (DA A) MJH Apartments- Level II Wet Pond Routings BasinFlow printout INPUT: Basin: MJH Apartments- Level II Wet Pond Routings 6 Contour Areas Elevation(ft) Area(sf) Computed Vol.(cy) 376.00 682.00 0.0 378.00 2623.00 114.6 379.00 4712.00 248.6 380.00 8311.00 486.6 382.00 14412.00 1317.9 384.00 20500.00 2604.3 Start_Elevation(ft) 380.00 Vol.(cy) Page 1 486.62 MJH Apartments- Level II Wet Pond Routings 4 Outlet Structures Outlet structure 0 Orifice name: Barrel area (sf) 4.909 diameter or depth (in) 30.000 width for rect. (in) 0.000 coefficient 0.500 invert (ft) 372.500 multiple 1 discharge out of riser Outlet structure 1 Orifice name: Low -Flow Orifice area (sf) 0.196 diameter or depth (in) 6.000 width for rect. (in) 0.000 coefficient 0.500 invert (ft) 380.000 multiple 1 discharge into riser Outlet structure 2 Weir name: Riser diameter (in) 24.000 side angle 0.000 coefficient 3.300 invert (ft) 381.750 multiple 1 discharge into riser transition at (ft) 0.608 orifice coef. 0.500 orifice area (sf) 3.142 Outlet structure 3 Weir name: Emergency Spillway length (ft) 100.000 side angle 75.960 coefficient 3.300 invert (ft) 382.750 multiple 1 discharge through dam Page 2 MJH Apartments- Level II Wet Pond Routings 4 Inflow Hydrographs Hydrograph 0 SCS name: 1-yr 24-hr SCS Method Design Storm Area (acres) 6.020 CN 84.400 Type 2 rainfall, P (in) 3.020 time of conc. (hrs) 0.1000 time increment (hrs) 0.0200 time limit (hrs) 30.000 fudge factor 1.00 routed true peak flow (cfs) 11.927 peak time (hrs) 11.917 volume (cy) 1262.762 Hydrograph 1 SCS name: 2-yr 24-hr SCS Method Design Storm Area (acres) 6.020 CN 84.400 Type 2 rainfall, P (in) 3.650 time of conc. (hrs) 0.1000 time increment (hrs) 0.0200 time limit (hrs) 30.000 fudge factor 1.00 routed true peak flow (cfs) 16.027 peak time (hrs) 11.917 volume (cy) 1696.813 Hydrograph 2 SCS name: 10-yr 24-hr SCS Method Design Storm Area (acres) 6.020 CN 84.400 Type 2 rainfall, P (in) 5.520 time of conc. (hrs) 0.1000 time increment (hrs) 0.0200 time limit (hrs) 30.000 fudge factor 1.00 routed true peak flow (cfs) 28.952 peak time (hrs) 11.917 volume (cy) 3065.166 Page 3 Hydrograph 3 SCS name: Area (acres) CN Type rainfall, P (in) time of conc. (hrs) time increment (hrs) time limit (hrs) fudge factor routed peak flow (cfs) peak time (hrs) volume (cy) MJH Apartments- Level II Wet Pond Routings 100-yr 24-hr SCS Method Design Storm 6.020 84.400 2 OUTPUT: Routing Method: storage -indication Hydrograph 0 Routing Summary of Peaks: 1-yr 24-hr SCS Method Design Storm inflow (cfs) 11.871 at 11.92 (hrs) discharge (cfs) 0.922 at 12.50 (hrs) water level (ft) 381.620 at 12.52 (hrs) storage (cy) 1124.076 Hydrograph 1 Routing Summary of Peaks: 2-yr 24-hr SCS Method Design Storm inflow (cfs) 15.952 at 11.92 (hrs) discharge (cfs) 2.854 at 12.14 (hrs) water level (ft) 381.948 at 12.14 (hrs) storage (cy) 1290.384 Hydrograph 2 Routing Summary of Peaks: 10-yr 24-hr SCS Method Design Storm inflow (cfs) 28.817 at 11.92 (hrs) discharge (cfs) 13.232 at 12.06 (hrs) water level (ft) 382.659 at 12.06 (hrs) storage (cy) 1692.170 Hydrograph 3 Routing Summary of Peaks: 100-yr 24-hr SCS Method Design Storm inflow (cfs) 54.558 at 11.92 (hrs) discharge (cfs) 51.778 at 11.94 (hrs) water level (ft) 382.979 at 11.94 (hrs) storage (cy) 1891.521 Wed Mar 06 10:35:57 EST 2019 Page 4 I owA'k 11I �ec�PT a�� WA�a b � bA'AIJ� LQve�� �oa� j= eR pp a VA F, it RPL't16 a = TQL" V� o � �ct�eh,+� os '7,a o.o\ h r`co- ;Rc L055 da- �)tQ Jc-<o;14nC-AOC R ��t" RCSGA-voiR Or FAc'rN aC- SAS Y 11 �.. FLzW L �KZL1< 15 +Ft ... t> ��a 7 11lTT 31 Ott AMENDED Dry Detention Cell Routing Calculations (DA 6) MJH Apartments- Detention Cell Routings BasinFlow printout INPUT: Basin: MJH Apartments- Detention Cell Routings.txt 5 Contour Areas Elevation(ft) Area(sf) Computed Vol.(cy) 352.00 537.00 0.0 354.00 2282.00 96.9 356.00 4631.00 347.9 358.00 7392.00 789.2 360.00 10557.00 1450.5 Start—Elevation(ft) 4 Outlet Structures Outlet structure 0 Orifice 352.00 Vol.(cy) 0.00 name: Barrel area (sf) 3.142 diameter or depth (in) 24.000 width for rect. (in) 0.000 coefficient 0.500 invert (ft) 350.000 multiple 1 discharge out of riser Outlet structure 1 Orifice name: Low -Flow Orifice area (sf) 0.032 diameter or depth (in) 2.420 width for rect. (in) 0.000 coefficient 0.500 invert (ft) 352.000 multiple 1 discharge into riser Page 1 MJH Apartments- Detention Cell Routings Outlet structure 2 Weir name: Riser diameter (in) 24.000 side angle 0.000 coefficient 3.300 invert (ft) 357.500 multiple 1 discharge into riser transition at (ft) 0.608 orifice coef. 0.500 orifice area (sf) 3.142 Outlet structure 3 Weir name: Emergency Spillway length (ft) 50.000 side angle 75.960 coefficient 3.300 invert (ft) 358.660 multiple 1 discharge through dam 4 Inflow Hydrographs Hydrograph 0 SCS name: 1-yr 24-hr SCS Method Design Storm Area (acres) 5.690 CN 83.300 Type 2 rainfall, P (in) 3.020 time of conc. (hrs) 0.1000 time increment (hrs) 0.0200 time limit (hrs) 30.000 fudge factor 1.00 routed true peak flow (cfs) 10.711 peak time (hrs) 11.917 volume (cy) 1133.953 Page 2 Hydrograph 1 SCS MJH Apartments- Detention Cell Routings name: 2-yr 24-hr SCS Method Design Storm Area (acres) 5.690 CN 83.300 Type 2 rainfall, P (in) 3.650 time of conc. (hrs) 0.1000 time increment (hrs) 0.0200 time limit (hrs) 30.000 fudge factor 1.00 routed true peak flow (cfs) 14.507 peak time (hrs) 11.917 volume (cy) 1535.863 Hydrograph 2 SCS name: 10-yr 24-hr SCS Method Design Storm Area (acres) 5.690 CN 83.300 Type 2 rainfall, P (in) 5.520 time of conc. (hrs) 0.1000 time increment (hrs) 0.0200 time limit (hrs) 30.000 fudge factor 1.00 routed true peak flow (cfs) 26.559 peak time (hrs) 11.917 volume (cy) 2811.780 Hydrograph 3 SCS name: 100-yr 24-hr SCS Method Design Storm Area (acres) 5.690 CN 83.300 Type 2 rainfall, P (in) 9.070 time of conc. (hrs) 0.1000 time increment (hrs) 0.0200 time limit (hrs) 30.000 fudge factor 1.00 routed true peak flow (cfs) 50.835 peak time (hrs) 11.917 volume (cy) 5381.939 Page 3 MJH Apartments- Detention Cell Routings OUTPUT: Routing Method: storage -indication Hydrograph 0 Routing Summary of Peaks inflow (cfs) discharge (cfs) water level (ft) storage (cy) Hydrograph 1 Routing Summary of Peaks: inflow (cfs) discharge (cfs) water level (ft) storage (cy) 1-yr 24-hr SCS Method Design Storm 10.661 at 11.92 (hrs) 0.302 at 13.42 (hrs) 357.503 at 13.40 (hrs) 660.135 2-yr 24-hr SCS Method Design Storm 14.439 at 11.92 (hrs) 4.807 at 12.08 (hrs) 357.861 at 12.08 (hrs) 751.748 Hydrograph 2 Routing Summary of Peaks: 10-yr 24-hr SCS Method Design Storm inflow (cfs) 26.434 at 11.92 (hrs) discharge (cfs) 20.861 at 12.00 (hrs) water level (ft) 358.773 at 12.00 (hrs) storage (cy) 1017.214 Hydrograph 3 Routing Summary of Peaks: 100-yr 24-hr SCS Method Design Storm inflow (cfs) 50.597 at 11.92 (hrs) discharge (cfs) 49.660 at 11.92 (hrs) water level (ft) 359.003 at 11.92 (hrs) storage (cy) 1091.569 Wed Apr 22 10:33:42 EDT 2020 Page 4 AMENDED Riprap Lined Outlet Protection Calculations (DA 6) C)cwT --)pp �gC'f 4N CA�.CuLA,'lMoNS � (t3 ( 30 FG M, i - r a� zFs ��prva�}eS A �Ll �AtTC� Or - Do TeX. VE5r-k MNC a,12 _-S, TIAC FoL ok-Ux ! 3s -TRIE P-kV%aMUM Qv1LS't tAsr- --Clj DeQ6N4 W, 61 MIN . LA V Vie= �If' !� S"v �CPTM ` \'5` V o crr e,w r uaSS 1992 3.18 -el JaDj 'BZLS dvjdLU Osp C11 — C> C� C) Of �--4724 ®R EEC' M-MEME-M --- MEMO. wo C> L-L v ell Cp 4J Cn fl Cm i. as 41 O Source: USDA-SCS WKS M m Im O yf Plate 3.18-3 TIT -I.CA AMENDED DEQ Virginia Runoff Reduction Method Water Quality Calculations Compliance is met through the two best management practices of a level II wet pond and the purchasing of nutrient credits, consistent with the originally approved VSMP plan. Please note however, the following water quality calculations were updated with this amendment to reflect an increased limits of disturbance. The result is a minor increase in the phosphorous loading required to be removed. The original VSMP approved plan required a nutrient credit purchase of 6.24 Ibs/yr. This amendment now requires a total nutrient credit purchase of 6.68 Ibs/yr. This is an additional 0.44 Ibs/yr. of phosphorous. Oilfl -III N 11 a A �w9 4 Mill W Q O o O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000 0 lJ Q 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O O 00000 0 00 Q O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 0 00000 0 a Q O O O 00 O 00 N N N N Y O M M N N 0 Q 'q LY oC C a C LY �i L li U W W W LLL x Q t¢> r w r u }�i V N O W LL W W Z h oe cc oe oe 3 m Vf L Lu r r a Q Q O at r W ] m N W O a C G LLI > d N a tv Z m 0 0< G R 0. LLL w d a L- c Q N m N E 3 O C u 3 N O C 3 M F O N M M 0 01 l0 N N a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 011c, 0 '11 ' M fl 0 0o p 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 O c o 011 C, C, 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 o p 0 0 0 0 Q N 1 V Iq 1pm w ^ Q 1 l0 tN ��"l N roo� NM I'- V T d T V T� a T T T d LU LV a Z O " W Z a ` W LLL W N a O LLL W LY C s O LLL W< u 0 ag W x Z as x 0 FCxa Z ar c z=L W O CW Q t JL 0 Z 0 d' 0 Z O }L W 2 Z O Z 0 OC C Z O 3 L Z i >� u 0 H Ou�O u £ pOF LJLLu: Z m t7 g 0 J H 0 W Q 0 J F 0 O W 0J.L 0 F W� W 0 C — c �Q 0 a0 C a to L a J J '0 a J J O tOi dp� J LL o J CL r LZLL J a r r d r = Z L LY i F 0 Z z Z 0 0 1 LL Z ¢ Z Zt O H P Runoff Volume and Curve Number Calculations Enter design storm rainfall depths (in): 1-year storm 2-year storm 10-yearstorm 3.02 3.65 5.52 Use NOAA Atlas 14 (hap://hdsc.nw noaa.go lhdsc/pfds/) *Notes (see below): [1] The curve numbers and runoff volumes computed in this spreadsheet for each drainage area are limited in their applicability for determining and demonstrating compliance with water quantity requirements. See VRRM User's Guide and Documentation for additional information. [2] Runoff Volume (RV) for pre- and post -development drainage areas must be in volumetric units (e.g., acre-feet or cubic feet) when using the Energy Balance Equation. Runoff measured in watershed - inches and shown in the spreadsheet as RV(watershed-inch) can only be used in the Energy Balance Equation when the pre- and post -development drainage areas are equal. Otherwise RV(watershed-inch) must be multiplied by the drainage area. [3] Adjusted CNs are based on runoff reduction volumes as calculated in D.A. tabs. An alternative CN adjustment calculation for Vegetated Roofs is included in BMP specification No. 5. Drainage Area Curve Numbers and Runoff Depths* Curve numbers (CN, CNadj) and runoff depths (RV oe�ela ed) are computed with and without reduction practices. Drainage Area ASoils BSoils CSoils DSoils Total Area (acres): 6.02 Forest/Open Space-- undisturbed, protected forest/open space or reforested land Area (acres) CN 0.00 30 0.00 55 0.00 70 0.00 77 Runoff Reduction Volume ftt : 0 Managed Turf --disturbed, graded for yards or other turf to be mowed/managed Area (acres) CN 0.00 39 2.22 61 0.00 74 0.00 80 Impervious Cover Area (acres) CN 0.00 98 3.80 98 0.00 98 0.00 98 _ CN(D.A. A) 84 1-year storm 2-year storm'', 10-year storm RVa-Iii,ped (watershed -inch) with no Runoff Reduction* 1.53 2.07 3.75 RVpe„e101d (watershed -inch) with Runoff Reduction* 1.53 2.07 3.75 Adjusted CN* -- 84 ga *See Notes above Drainage Area B A Soils B Soils C Soils D Soils Total Area (acres): 0.00 Forest/Open Space -- undisturbed, protected forest/open space or reforested land Area (acres) CN 0.00 30 0.00 55 0.00 70 0.00 77 Runoff Reduction Volume fts : 0 Managed Turf --disturbed, graded for yards or other turf to be mowed/managed Area (acres) CN 0.00 39 0.00 61 0.00 74 0.00 80 Impervious Cover Area (acres) CN 0.00 98 0.00 98 0.00 98 0.00 98 CN(D.A. a) 0 1-yearstorm 2-yearstorm 10-yearstorm RV�loped (watershed -inch) with no Runoff Reduction* 0.00 0.00 0.00 RVpe„elapld (watershed -inch) with Runoff Reduction.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 Adjusted CN* 1 e 0 0 *See Notes above Drainage Area C A Soils B Soils C SoilsrDils Total Area (acres): 0.00 Forest/Open Space -- undisturbed, protected forest/open space or reforested land Area (acres) CN 0.00 30 0.00 55 0.00 70 Runoff Reduction Volume ft: 0 Managed Turf -disturbed, graded for yards or other turf be mowed/managed Area(acres) CN 0.00 39 0.00 61 0.00to 74Impervious Cover Area (acres) 0.00 98 0.00 98 0.00CN 98 0 1-yearstorm 2-year storm 10-yearstorm RVpeeloped (watershed -inch) with no Runoff Reduction* 0.00 0.00 0.60 RVD_eloped (watershed -inch) with Runoff Reduction* 0.00 0.00 0.00 Adjusted CN* 0 0 0 *See Notes above Drainage Area D A Soils B Soils C Soils D Soils Total Area (acres): 0,00 Forest/Open Space -- undisturbed, protected forest/open space or reforested land Area (acres) CN 0.00 30 0.00 55 0.00 70 0.00 77 Runoff Reduction Volume fta : 0 Managed Turf -disturbed, graded for yards or other turf to be mowed/managed Area (acres) CN 0.00 39 0.00 61 0.00 74 0.00 80 Impervious Cover Area (acres) CN 0.00 98 0.00 98 0.00 98 0.00 98 CNID.A. DI 0 1-year storm 2-year storm 10-yearstorm RV�„eloped (Watershed -inch) with no Runoff Reduction* 0.00 0.00 0.00 RVDeveloped (watershed -inch) with Runoff Reduction* 0.00 0.00 0.00 Adjusted CN* r o 0 0 *See Notes above Drainage Area E A Soils B Soils C Soils D Soils Total Area (acres): 0,00 Forest/Open Space -- undisturbed, protected forest/open space or reforested land Area (acres) CN 0.00 30 0.00 55 0.00 70 0.00 77 Runoff Reduction Volume (ft'): 0 Managed Turf -disturbed, graded for yards or other turf to be mowed/managed Area (acres) CN 0.00 39 0.00 61 0.00 74 0.00 80 Impervious Cover Area (acres) CN 0.00 98 0.00 98 0.00 98 0.00 98 CNID.A. EI 0 1-year storm 2-yearstorm 10-yearstorm RVD-eloped (watershed -inch) with no Runoff Reduction* 0.00 0.00 0.60 RVDmloped (Watershed -inch) with Runoff Reduction* 0.00 0.00 0.00 'Adjusted CN* 0 0 0 *See Notes above u O! a di v x 0 M rl O N C 6 a. Oi CL a Z m £ E tA d in T d in Flo rn �l� Q I O O O O O O O O O U' 0 0 olo a m Qlo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w � . w E E v .Q E O U Gl Ln T w 4 v Q c Q c E o. c u 3 v a[ H H c c a m m m £ � £ Q F F F z z z C a` C9 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 C� C� O 0 0 0 0 0 "'0000 00 C� C� 0 0 0 0 0 0 co 0 0 C� C� 0 0 C9 q 7 u" t o u =' m o w tu in c 0 V d O1 c� G m W W a O O O O O O C O 0 W a o 0 0 0 0 0 c O u w a o 0 0 0 0 0 m o 0 0 o p o o p o o p c O m m o 0 0 o p o o p o o p R O O O O O O C 0 a W N N � C O ®® ® L_ c L_ c L_ c u 3 3 a N 3 3 a N 3 3 a N z m z m z a m > z °3 ® 3 z u 3 3 z u 3 3 z u ®® z z z 0 O 0 U�y G G G. w Z 3 b c ac rl