Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB202000034 Staff Report 2020-05-20ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT Project #/Name ARB-2020-34: Valvoline Initial Site Plan Review Type Initial Site Plan/Preliminary Review of Architectural Design Parcel Identification 04500-00-00-IIICO Location East of 29 North, west of Gander Drive between Atlantic Union Bank and Goodwill Zoned Highway Commercial (HQ, Entrance Corridor (EC) Owner/Applicant First Gold Leaf Land Trust / CESO (Kelly Schwieterman) Magisterial District Rio Proposal To construct a 2,080-sf oil change facility with associated site improvements on approximately .52 acres. Context The subject property is accessed by an internal road, Gander Drive, and is located within the Northtown Center development. Route 29 is largely characterized by commercial development with nearby developments including Rivanna Plaza across Route 29 to the west, Lowe's and Rio Hill Shopping Center to the southwest, Harbor Freight and Goodwill in the former Gander Mountain store to the south, and another phase of the Northtown Center to the southeast. Visibility The north, south (sides), and west (front) elevations are expected to be visible from the Entrance Corridor. ARB Meeting Date Originally April 20, 2020 rescheduled to May 18, 2020 Staff Contact Khris Taggart PROJECT HISTORY The ARB reviewed ARB-2013-183, a proposal to construct a one-story, 2,400 s.f. Sonic restaurant with associated parking, outdoor seating and drive- thru/drive-in food service for this site. ti - - aiai-9t-aA ' r to -MA 4 Atlantic Union Bank s_ Budget•*CGS -109i� 315 r t 45-tt1C V_— y[yyY�1q TT ' \ IAJIL�]$V �43110� bw 0 2y Fig 1: Google Image (left showing project area along the Entrance Corridor and County GIS map (right) highlighting subject property. ANALYSIS Frray highlight = means the guideline can't be reviewed at initial site plan stage, but recommendations can be provided for final Yellow highlight = means the guideline can only be reviewed for location/configuration at the initial plan stage Regular text = means the guideline can be reviewed at initial plan stage, can be made a condition of initial plan approval, and can be the basis for denial REF GUIDELINE I ISSUE I RECOMMENDATION Pur ose, Compatibility with significant historic sites and the character of the Entrance Corridor, Structure design 1 The goal of the regulation of the design of development The building's simple form, roof shape, and Revise the design to within the designated Entrance Corridors is to ensure that tower element and awnings emphasizing the make brick the primary new development within the corridors reflects the entrance are features found in local historic wall material. Limit EIFS traditional architecture of the area. Therefore, it is the buildings; however, the use of EIFS as the to a minor material for purpose of ARB review and of these Guidelines, that primary building material is not reflective of detailing. proposed development within the designated Entrance traditional architecture of the area. Revising Corridors reflect elements of design characteristic of the the mix of wall materials, making brick the significant historical landmarks, buildings, and structures primary material and using EIFS only as a of the Charlottesville and Albemarle area, and to promote minor material for detailing, would be more orderly and attractive development within these corridors. appropriate. Incorporating a second color of Applicants should note that replication of historic structures brick may help to further integrate the is neither required nor desired. buildin into the surrounding context of 2 2 Visitors to the significant historical sites in the buildings. Charlottesville and Albemarle area experience these sites as ensembles of buildings, land, and vegetation. In order The character of this Entrance Corridor is a to accomplish the integration of buildings, land, and mixture of small- and large-scale commercial vegetation characteristic of these sites, the Guidelines buildings. The proposed building would be require attention to four primary factors: compatibility consistent with the forms and scale of the with significant historic sites in the area; the character of smaller structures within the EC. The the Entrance Corridor; site development and layout; and proposed landscaping would bring the site landscaping. more in line with the EC Guidelines. 3 New structures and substantial additions to existin structures should respect the traditions of the architecture The overhead doors appear to incorporate of historically significant buildings in the Charlottesville glass; however, this is not indicated in the and Albemarle area. Photographs of historic buildings in architectural drawings. the area, as well as drawings of architectural features, Indicate in the which provide important examples of this tradition are architectural drawings the contained in Appendix A. materials to be utilized in the overhead doors. 4 The examples contained in Appendix A should be used as a guide for building design: the standard of compatibility with the area's historic structures is not intended to impose a rigid design solution for new development. Replication of the design of the important historic sites in the area is neither intended nor desired. The Guideline's standard of compatibility can be met through building scale, materials, and forms which may be embodied in architecture which is contemporary as well as traditional. The Guidelines allow individuality in design to accommodate varying tastes as well as special functional requirements. 5 It is also an important objective of the Guidelines to establish a pattern of compatible architectural characteristics throughout the Entrance Corridor in order to achieve unity and coherence. Building designs should demonstrate sensitivity to other nearby structures within the Entrance Corridor. Where a designated corridor is substantially developed, these Guidelines require striking a careful balance between harmonizing new development with the existing character of the corridor and achieving compatibility with the significant historic sites in the area. 9 Building forms and features, including roofs, windows, doors, materials, colors and textures should be compatible with the forms and features of the significant historic buildings in the area, exemplified by (but not limited to) the buildings described in Appendix A [of the design guidelines]. The standard of compatibility can be met through scale, materials, and forms which may be embodied in architecture which is contemporary as well as traditional. The replication of important historic sites in Albemarle County is not the objective of these guidelines. 10 Buildings should relate to their site and the surrounding context of buildings. 12 Architecture proposed within the Entrance Corridor should use forms, shapes, scale, and materials to create a cohesive whole. 11 The overall design of buildings should have human scale. The storefront bays, garage bay doors, and None at this time. Scale should be integral to the building and site design. the awning help to break up the fagade of the building and create a sense of human scale. 13 Any appearance of "blankness" resulting from building The north elevation, which is visible from Revise the north elevation design should be relieved using design detail or Seminole Trail, has the appearance of to incorporate additional vegetation, or both. "blankness" resulting from the lack of design design details to relieve details. This blankness would be relieved "blankness". through the addition of design details such as the storefront window/awning utilized on the west and south elevations or by incorporating additional building materials. The south elevation, also visible from Increase the size of the Seminole Trail, has an awkward appearance window along the south resulting from the length of the awning elevation to match the extending beyond the window. Aligning the length of the awning windows and awning would create a above. cohesive whole along this elevation. 14 Arcades, colonnades, or other architectural connecting There are no connecting devices proposed in None. devices should be used to unify groups of buildings within this site. A single building is proposed, so a a development. connecting device is not necessary. 15 Trademark buildings and related features should be This building appears to be a standardized Revise the EIFS to a modified to meet the requirements of the Guidelines. design with options for building materials. secondary building material to better meet the requirements of the Guidelines. 16 Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should not be, Specifications on the proposed window glass Provide specifications on highly tinted or highly reflective. Window glass in the and samples of tinted window glass have not the proposed window Entrance Corridors should meet the following criteria: been submitted at this time. glass. Provide samples, if Visible light transmittance (VLT) shall not drop below tinted window glass is 40%. Visible light reflectance (VLR) shall not exceed proposed. 30%. Specifications on the proposed window glass should be submitted with the application for final review. Accessory structures and equipment 17 Accessory structures and equipment should be integrated There are no accessory structures proposed. None. into the overall plan of development and shall, to the The proposed equipment, located behind the extent possible, be compatible with the building designs building, is not expected to be visible from sed on the site. the Entrance Corridor. 18 The following should be located to eliminate visibility from The dumpster is screened from view of the None. the Entrance Corridor street. If, after appropriate siting, EC street by landscaping and a CMU wall these features will still have a negative visual impact on the clad in brick/EIFS veneer matching the Entrance Corridor street, screening should be provided to building. eliminate visibility. a. Loading areas, b. Service areas, c. Refuse areas, d. Storage areas, e. Mechanical equipment, The proposed ground mounted equipment, f. Above -ground utilities, and g. Chain link fence, barbed located behind the building, is not expected None. wire, razor wire, and similar security fencing devices. to be visible from the Entrance Corridor. There are roof vents proposed on the north, east and south sides of the main roof and the None. east side of the tower roof. In the current locations shown, 4 out of the 12 vents are expected to be partially visible. However, the architectural plans include a note stating, "verify quantity and locations" of the proposed equipment. The equipment, including the visible portions, is proposed to be painted SW 7046 Anonymous to match the roof. The current locations shown and the color proposed sufficiently mitigates the visibility of the proposed equipment. Note that alternate locations with greater visibility will not be approved. The gas meter located near the northeast corner of the building may be visible from Revise the building the EC. Relocating it to the rear elevation elevations to show the would eliminate visibility from the EC. gas meter along the rear elevation. 19 Screening devices should be compatible with the design The dumpster enclosure is clad in brick/EIFS None. the buildings and surrounding natural vegetation and may veneer matching the building. consist of: a. Walls, b. Plantings, and c. Fencing. 21 The following note should be added to the site plan and the The note is not present on the site or Add the standard architectural plan: "Visibility of all mechanical equipment architectural plan. mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated." note to the site and architectural plans. Lighting 22 Light should be contained on the site and not spill over The lighting does not exceed .5 foot-candles None. onto adjacent properties or streets; over any public roadways or adjacent properties. 23 Light should be shielded, recessed or flush -mounted to The proposed lighting is flush mounted. The None. eliminate glare. All fixtures with lamps emitting 3000 proposed lamps emitting 3000 lumens or lumens or more must be full cutoff fixtures. more are full cutoff. 24 Light levels exceeding 30 foot-candles are not appropriatq The maximum proposed illumination at the None. for display lots in the Entrance Corridors. Lower light ground is 6.8 fc, which is expected to have levels will apply to most other uses in the Entrance an appropriate appearance. Corridors. 25 Light should have the appearance of white light with a The proposed fixtures do not have a Revise the pole -mounted warm soft glow; however, a consistent appearance consistent color temperature. The pole- fixtures to soft, warm throughout a site or development is required. mounted fixtures have a color temperature white (3k). Consequently, if existing lamps that emit non -white light approximating white daylight (5k) while the are to remain, new lamps may be required to match them. wall -mounted fixtures have a color temperature of soft, warm white 3k . 26 Dark brown, dark bronze, or black are appropriate colors The wall and pole -mounted fixtures are None. for free-standing pole mounted light fixtures in the proposed with a black finish. Entrance Corridors. 27 The height and scale of freestanding, pole -mounted light The height of the proposed pole -mounted Include a note on the fixtures should be compatible with the height and scale of lights does not exceed 20'. However, it is lighting plan indicating the buildings and the sites they are illuminating, and with unclear if this includes the base. that the 20' maximum the use of the site. Typically, the height of freestanding height of the pole - pole -mounted light fixtures in the Entrance Corridors The architectural plans indicate two types of mounted light fixtures should not exceed 20 feet, including the base. Fixtures thi wall lights; however, only one cutsheet was includes any base. exceed 20 feet in height will typically require additional provided. screening to achieve an appropriate appearance from the Entrance Corridor. The photometric plan includes proposed lights with an LLF (maintenance factor) of Revise the lighting plan to include cut sheets for 28 In determining the appropriateness of lighting fixtures for the Entrance Corridors, the individual context of the site less than 1.0 (0.855). This should be revised all wall lights. will be taken into consideration on a case by case basis. to 1.0. Revise lights with an LLF (maintenance factor) of less than 1.0 to 1.0. 29 The following note should be included on the lighting The note is not present on the lighting plan. Add the standard lighting plan: "Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp that note to the lighting plan. emits 3,000 or more initial lumens shall be a full cutoff luminaire and shall be arranged or shielded to reflect light away from adjoining residential districts and away from adjacent roads. The spillover of lighting from luminaires onto public roads and property in residential or rural areal zoning districts shall not exceed one half footcandle." 30- Guidelines for the Use of Decorative Landscape Lighting There is no decorative landscape lighting None. 31 proposed for the site. Landscaping 7 The requirements of the Guidelines regarding landscaping Street frontage along this stretch of the EC is Revise the landscape plan are intended to reflect the landscaping characteristic of characterized by primarily large shade trees to show interspersed many of the area's significant historic sites which is with interspersed ornamental trees. There are ornamentals trees along characterized by large shade trees and lawns. Landscaping existing large shade trees (5) planted along the EC. should promote visual order within the Entrance Corridor the frontage of the EC. The existing trees and help to integrate buildings into the existing range from 4" — 6" caliper and are spaced environment of the corridor. between 17' and 69' on center. The existing quantity of trees meets the requirement; 8 Continuity within the Entrance Corridor should be obtained by planting different types of plant materials that however, spacing exceeds 35' in some share similar characteristics. Such common elements places. In addition, there are no ornamental allow for more flexibility in the design of structures trees existing along the frontage or proposed because common landscape features will help to along the lease area. The addition of harmonize the appearance of development as seen from interspersed ornamentals in the gaps along the street upon which the Corridor is centered. the frontage would increase the continuity along the corridor. 32 Landscaping along the frontage of Entrance Corridor streets should include the following: a. Large shade trees should be planted parallel to the Entrance Corridor Street. Such trees should be at least 3'/2 inches caliper (measured 6 inches above the ground) and should be of a plant species common to the area. Such trees should be located at least every 35 feet on center. b. Flowering ornamental trees of a species common to the area should be interspersed among the trees required by the preceding paragraph. The ornamental trees need not alternate one for one with the large shade trees. They may be planted among the large shade trees in a less regular spacing pattern. c. In situations where appropriate, a three or four board fence or low stone wall, typical of the area, should align the frontage of the Entrance Corridor street. d. An area of sufficient width to accommodate the foregoing plantings and fencing should be reserved parallel to the Entrance Corridor street, and exclusive of road right-of-way and utility easements. 33 Landscaping along interior roads: There is no planting area proposed along None. a. Large trees should be planted parallel to all interior Gander Drive. The proposed site layout roads. Such trees should be at least 2'/z inches caliper leaves the Gander frontage open for (measured six inches above the ground) and should be of vehicular circulation. This planting does not plant species common to the area. Such trees should be appear to be feasible. located at least every 40 feet on center. 34 Landscaping along interior pedestrian ways: There are no interior pedestrian ways beyond None. a. Medium trees should be planted parallel to all interior the sidewalk along the perimeter of the pedestrian ways. Such trees should be at least 2'h inches building. caliper (measured six inches above the ground) and should be of a species common to the area. Such trees should be located at least every 25 feet on center. 35 Landscaping of parking areas: Three large shade trees are proposed along Revise the landscape plan a. Large trees should align the perimeter of parking areas, the western perimeter of the paved area. This to include additional located 40 feet on center. Trees should be planted in the satisfies the required quantity of trees; planting in the gap along interior of parking areas at the rate of one tree for every 10 however, the spacing is irregular, leaving a the western perimeter of parking spaces provided and should be evenly distributed gap aligned with the entrance tower. the paved area. throughout the interior of the parking area. Additional landscaping should be provided b. Trees required by the preceding paragraph should to fill the gap and provide a consistent measure 2'/2 inches caliper (measured six inches above the appearance. ground); should be evenly spaced; and should be of a species common to the area. Such trees should be planted The proposed shrubs along the perimeter of None. in planters or medians sufficiently large to maintain the the parking area are 24" - 30" in height. health of the tree and shall be protected by curbing. c. Shrubs should be provided as necessary to minimize the The south perimeter of the parking area has parking area's impact on Entrance Corridor streets. Shrubs the required number of trees; however, the should measure 24 inches in height. spacing is irregular. This spacing None. accommodates existing trees located outside the project area along the southern boundary of the lease area, which help to screen the paved areas of the site. Three trees are required along the northern perimeter of the parking area, but none are Revise the landscape plan proposed. to show large shade trees at 40'on center and 2.5" caliper along the northern perimeter of the parking area. There are ten parking spaces proposed. This requires one interior tree, which has been None. proposed. At 2" caliper, the proposed interior and perimeter trees are smaller than the Revise the caliper of the requirement. proposed interior and perimeter parking trees to the required 2.5". 36 Landscaping of buildings and other structures: There is a planting bed proposed along the Revise the landscaping a. Trees or other vegetation should be planted along the west end of the building in front of the proposed to shrubs that front of long buildings as necessary to soften the building's entrance. The shrubs proposed are are at least 24" in height. appearance of exterior walls. The spacing, size, and type 18" in height. of such trees or vegetation should be determined by the length, height, and blankness of such walls. b. Shrubs should be used to integrate the site, buildings, and other structures; dumpsters, accessory buildings and structures; "drive thru" windows; service areas; and signs. Shrubs should measure at least 24 inches in height. 37 Plant species: The proposed plants are on the recommended None. a. Plant species required should be as approved by the species list. Staff based upon but not limited to the Generic Lnndscap7 Plan Recommended Species List and Native Plants for Virginia Landscapes (Appendix D . 38 Plant health: The note is not present on the landscape plan. Add the standard The following note should be added to the landscape plan: landscaping note to the "All site plantings of trees and shrubs shall be allowed to landscape plan. reach, and be maintained at, mature height; the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall be pruned minimally and only to support the overall health of the plant." Development paftern Site development and layout 6 Site development should be sensitive to the existing The site has been previously graded, and the None. natural landscape and should contribute to the creation of existing grading is not being significantly an organized development plan. This may be altered. accomplished, to the extent practical, by preserving the trees and rolling terrain typical of the area; planting new trees along streets and pedestrian ways and choosing species that reflect native forest elements; insuring that any grading will blend into the surrounding topography thereby creating a continuous landscape; preserving, to the extent practical, existing significant river and stream valleys which may be located on the site and integrating these features into the design of surrounding development; and limiting the building mass and height to a scale that does not overpower the natural settings of the site, or the Entrance Corridor. 39 The relationship of buildings and other structures to the The building is parallel to the EC and the None. 10 Entrance Corridor street and to other development within distance from the building to the EC and on - the corridor should be as follows: site circulation patterns are similar to the a. An organized pattern of roads, service lanes, bike paths, surrounding area. and pedestrian walks should guide the layout of the site. b. In general, buildings fronting the Entrance Corridor An existing sidewalk runs along Seminole street should be parallel to the street. Building groupings Trail and is to remain. should be arranged to parallel the Entrance Corridor street. c. Provisions should be made for connections to adjacent The site has been previously graded. No pedestrian and vehicular circulation systems. significant natural features remain. d. Open spaces should be tied into surrounding areas to provide continuity within the Entrance Corridor. e. If significant natural features exist on the site (including creek valleys, steep slopes, significant trees or rock outcroppings), to the extent practical, then such natural features should be reflected in the site layout. If the Views are not expected to be negatively provisions of Section 32.5.2.n of the Albemarle County impacted. Zoning Ordinance apply, then improvements required by that section should be located so as to maximize the use of existing features in screening such improvements from Entrance Corridor streets. £ The placement of structures on the site should respect existing views and vistas on and around the site. Site Grading 40 Site grading should maintain the basic relationship of the The existing site grading is not being None. site to surrounding conditions by limiting the use of significantly altered. retaining walls and by shaping the terrain through the use of smooth, rounded landforms that blend with the existing terrain. Steep cut or fill sections are generally unacceptable. Proposed contours on the grading plan shall be rounded M a ten -foot minimum radius where they meet the adjacent condition. Final grading should achieve a natural, rather than engineered, appearance. Retaining walls 6 feet in height and taller, when necessary, shall be terraced and planted to blend with the landscape. 41 No grading, trenching, or tunneling should occur within the There are existing trees along the frontage Show existing trees on drip line of any trees or other existing features designated and along the southern perimeter of the the existing conditions for preservation in the final Certificate of Appropriateness. project/lease area, but no existing trees are plan Adequate tree protection fencing should be shown on, and shown on the existing conditions plan. coordinated throughout, the grading, landscaping and Show areas designated erosion and sediment control plans. for preservation on the There are no existing trees in the site plan. Maintain project/lease area. Tree protection fencing grading outside the for the existing trees along the southern driplines of trees to perimeter of the project/lease area is not remain. Show tree shown on the grading, landscaping, or protection fencing on and erosion and sediment control plans. coordinated throughout 42 Areas designated for preservation in the final Certificate There are no areas in the project/lease area the grading, landscaping, of Appropriateness should be clearly delineated and that are designated for preservation. The and erosion and sediment protected on the site prior to any grading activity on the existing trees along southern perimeter of the control plans. site. This protection should remain in place until project/lease area should be clearly completion of the development of the site. delineated and protected. 43 Preservation areas should be protected from storage or There are no areas in the project/lease area movement of heavy equipment within this area. that are designated for preservation. The existing trees along southern perimeter of the project/lease area should be protected from storage or movement of heavy equipment. 20 Surface runoff structures and detention ponds should be The stormwater features proposed are None. designed to fit into the natural topography to avoid the need underground. for screening. When visible from the Entrance Corridor street, these features must be fully integrated into the landscape. They should not have the appearance of engineered features. 44 Natural drainage patterns (or to the extent required, new The site has been previously graded. None. drainage patterns) should be incorporated into the finished Drainage patterns are not changing. site to the extent possible. SIGNS Signage is reviewed and approved by a Sign applications are separate submission. However, the following required for all proposed preliminary comments are provided. signs. The ARB may require that the color and 12 scale of standard templates for trademarks, service marks, corporate logos, and graphics be modified. Cabinet style signs are shown on the west, south and east elevations. This is not the Eliminate cabinet style preferred sign type in the ECs. Note the signs or limit them to cabinet sign on the east elevation will not be secondary signs. All visible from the EC; therefore; that particular cabinet type signs must sign does not require ARB review. If have opaque illuminated, the background portion of the backgrounds. cabinet style signs must be opaque. The signs appear to propose four colors. The use of three colors or fewer is appropriate for signs in the Entrance Corridor. Reduce the number of colors used in the sign to The Pantone equivalents for the proposed be no more than three sign colors are not indicated in the (including white). architectural drawings but similar signs use Pantone red 485C. 485C is not approvable as a primary sign color. Pantone 187C has been Eliminate overly intense approved as an acceptable substitute by the colors from the sign ARB. On a case by case basis, 485C may be proposal. acceptable as a secondary color. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends the following as the primary points of discussion: 1. Landscaping along the EC and the perimeter of the parking area. 2. Proposed building materials. 3. Design of the north and south elevations. 4. The signage shown in the elevations. Staff recommends that the ARB forward the following recommendations to the Agent for the Site Review Committee: 13 • Regarding requirements to satisfy the design guidelines as per § 18-30.6.4c(2), (3) and (5) and recommended conditions of initial plan approval: None. • Regarding recommendations on the plan as it relates to the guidelines: None. • Regarding conditions to be satisfied prior to issuance of a grading permit: 1. Maintain grading outside the driplines of trees to remain. Show tree protection fencing on, and coordinated throughout, the grading, landscaping, and erosion and sediment control plans. • Regarding the final site plan submittal: A Certificate of Appropriateness is required prior to final site plan approval. The following items and all items on the ARB Final Site Plan Checklist must be addressed: 1. Revise the design to make brick the primary wall material. Limit EIFS to a minor material for detailing. 2. Indicate in the architectural drawings the materials to be utilized in the overhead doors. 3. Revise the north elevation to incorporate additional design details to relieve "blankness". 4. Increase the size of the window along the south elevation to match the length of the awning above. 5. Revise the EIFS to a secondary building material to better meet the requirements of the Guidelines. 6. Provide specifications on the proposed window glass. Provide samples, if tinted window glass is proposed. 7. Revise the building elevations to show the gas meter along the rear elevation. 8. Add the standard mechanical equipment note to the site and architectural plans. 9. Revise the pole -mounted fixtures to soft, warm white (3k). 10. Include a note on the lighting plan indicating that the 20' maximum height of the pole -mounted light fixtures includes any base. 11. Revise the lighting plan to include cut sheets for all wall lights. 12. Revise lights with an LLF (maintenance factor) of less than 1.0 to 1.0. 13. Add the standard lighting note to the lighting plan. 14. Revise the landscape plan to show interspersed ornamentals trees along the EC. 15. Revise the landscape plan to include additional planting in the gap along the western perimeter of the paved area. 16. Revise the landscape plan to show large shade trees at 40'on center and 2.5" caliper along the northern perimeter of the parking area. 17. Revise the caliper of the proposed interior and perimeter parking trees to the required 2.5". 18. Revise the landscaping proposed to shrubs that are at least 24" in height. 19. Add the standard landscaping note to the landscape plan. 20. Show existing trees on the existing conditions plan. 14 21. Show areas designated for preservation on the site plan. Maintain grading outside the driplines of trees to remain. Show tree protection fencing on and coordinated throughout the grading, landscaping, and erosion and sediment control plans. 22. Sign applications are required for all proposed signs. Eliminate cabinet style signs or limit them to secondary signs. All cabinet type signs must have opaque backgrounds. Reduce the number of colors used in the sign to be no more than three (including white). Eliminate overly intense colors from the sign proposal. 15 TABLE A This report is based on the following submittal items: Sheet # Drawing Name Drawing Date/Revision Date Site Plan C 1.0 Title 3/6/20 C2.0 Ex. Conditions and Demolition Plan 3/6/20 C3.0 Site Plan 3/6/20 C4.0 Grading Plan 3/6/20 C5.0 Storm Drainage Plan 3/6/20 C6.0 Utility Plan 3/6/20 C7.0 Construction Details 3/6/20 C8.0 Photometric Plan 3/6/20 L1.0 Landscape Plan 3/6/20 L2.0 Irrigation Plan 3/6/20 Architectural Drawin s A-3a Exterior Elevations 2/19/20 A-3b Exterior Elevations 2/19/20 16 ATTACHMENTS 1. Site Plan and Architectural Drawings 2. Material Board 17