HomeMy WebLinkAboutZMA202000006 Review Comments Zoning Map Amendment 2020-06-09COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
June 9, 2020
Scott Collins
Collins Engineering
200 Garret Street, Suite K
Charlottesville, VA 22902
RE: Review Comment Letter #1: ZMA202000006 — Spring Hill Village Proffer Amendment
Dear Mr. Scott Collins:
Staff has reviewed your initial submittal for Rezoning to amend the proffers of ZMA201300017
(Spring Hill Village) to remove the proposed left turn lane on Route 20 and to provide a
pedestrian path instead of a sidewalk along Route 20.
We have some questions and comments which we believe should be resolved before your
proposal goes to public hearing. We would be glad to meet with you to discuss these issues.
Our comments are provided below.
Comments are organized as follows:
1. Major aspects of the Rezoning and application that staff strongly recommends be
addressed through a resubmittal.
2. Additional comments from reviewers.
3. How the proposal relates to the Comprehensive Plan.
Rezoning: Major Aspects
1. Make technical revisions to proffers per Planning and Zoning comments.
2. Revise the application plan to include all other required improvements per
ZMA201300017.
3. Provide public access for pedestrian path along Route 20.
4. Provide conceptual grading.
Planning Comments:
The following comments related to planning matters have been provided by Tori Kanellopoulos:
1. Left turn warrant for Avon Street Extended should not be part of this application. The left
turn lane on Avon is not shown on the approved application plan (dated 08-29-14)
associated with the current proffers. Therefore, it is not a proffer, and is only a site plan
issue. This can be determined during road and site plan review.
2. Proffer #4: The revised application plan does not contain all of the previously approved
requirements as shown in the application plan for ZMA201300017 (dated 08-29-14). The
revised application plan (04-20-20) does not show the following: undergrounding of
utilities; offsite sewer connection; underground stormwater detention along Route 20;
and required landscaping. The only changes requested in the narrative are to remove
the left turn lane from Route 20 and to convert the sidewalk along Route 20 to a
pedestrian path. All other requirements from the current proffers must be shown, or an
updated narrative and staff analysis is required if other changes are requested.
3. Proffer #4: Revise language to be "Spring Hill Village" instead of "Springhill Village".
4. Proffer #4: Revise language to use previous language regarding timing. Route 20
improvements should be completed prior to the first CO. Fire/Rescue requires two
access points after the 30th dwelling unit. See Zoning comments for additional
information.
5. A public access easement should be provided with the proposed pedestrian path. The
proposed path is outside of the public ROW. Given that the previously approved
sidewalk was in the public ROW, public access should be maintained. VDOT will not
maintain the pedestrian path — therefore, the path should be fully located outside the
ROW. See Transportation Planning comments for additional details. Pedestrian
connectivity is also called for along Route 20 in the Southern/Western Master Plan.
6. Provide conceptual grading for the proposed changed improvements (pedestrian path
and Route improvements).
7. See Comprehensive Plan section for any comments related to Neighborhood Model
Principles.
8. Advisory comment: Note that review of this application does not constitute Road Plan
review and approval. All outstanding Road Plan comments will be addressed with the
Road and Site Plans.
Zoning
The following comments related to zoning matters have been provided by Kevin McCollum:
1. 1 recommend that they follow the language previously used in Proffer number 4. This
rezoning was to change what road improvements were required but not change when
they had to be completed. It is understandable why the last sentences regarding Route
20 improvements were removed but not the timing changes.
Engineering
The following comments related to engineering and water resources have been provided by
Emily Cox:
1. No objection.
Fire/Rescue
The following comments related to fire/rescue have been provided by Shawn Maddox:
1. Fire Rescue has no objections. However, note that a second point of access is require
after the 30th dwelling unit. Therefore, the Route 20 entrance/exit must be accessible
after 30 dwelling units.
VDOT
The following comments from VDOT have been provided by Adam Moore:
1. See attached letter dated June 9, 2020.
Building Inspections
The following comments from Inspections have been provided by Michael Dellinger:
1. No objection.
Transportation Planning
The following comments from Transportation Planning staff have been provided by Dan Butch:
1. Route 20 pedestrian improvement as shown as 8' wide asphalt pedestrian path should
stay within amenity area/pocket park from northern property line to southern property
line with developer to maintain. Or, within VDOT's ROW as 10' wide asphalt path for
VDOT to maintain. Either choice should consult with VDOT of pedestrian crossing of
path on proposed exit/entrance to site of Route 20.
Comprehensive Plan
Comments on how your project conforms to the Comprehensive Plan will be provided to the
Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors as part of the staff report that will be prepared
for the public hearing. Initial comments are provided with this comment letter.
The proposed development is designated Community Mixed Use in the Southern and Western
Master Plan. This designation calls for a mixture of residential and retail uses and services that
serve the community, with a residential density of up to 34 dwelling units per acre and non-
residential uses including community scale retail, service and office uses, places of worship,
schools, and public and institutional uses.
The Master Plan has the following guidance on Route 20:
• Route 20 and Route 53 are rural section roads which are narrow.
• Provide a vegetative buffer along Rt. 20 South of 1-64.
• Route 20 South Improvements: Improve Rt. 20 South with curb, gutter, sidewalks or
pedestrian paths and bikeways on the western side within the Development Area
boundary.
• Construct bicycle and pedestrian facilities along Route 20 to provide access to schools
and accommodate increased development in that area.
The development is located in an `other area of importance' as designated by the Master Plan:
South of that area is land designated for Community Mixed Use (Spring Hill Village), which will
help provide a transition between the Office/R&D/Flex/ Light Industrial area and the residential
designations to the south. Residential, retail, service, office, and light industrial employment
uses are appropriate in this area of Community Mixed Use.
cemm —y Mi.ed Lc.
IIIII J
Ma dea:pn¢}i¢rt reprea<Ma ¢ m..rve ¢I reaidmt�ul �i:::
eaetl ..sea mid 1er.kca abet ae•.e RK cvr.nr.etY.
Q<thler�tld tle1aWY W w 3d r<lita Pe• enr. Mi. hwe ¢I
mart W1Fd•1 bsrlW4apa h texaww¢grd WIXr •et¢A/o111ce ¢.�
grwd f m, and,ealdamlel or ¢flke on upper 1b¢ra
Th. p¢pwraar d •vr-•nyere{¢I ¢tn r¢ alr¢n
rea4derriPl rhea U ¢rerP dep<Mma.
Car.rwer, anvl•q r rig.I .. �, _rf�_-
uwt; r<rdl, anrke, c - -
nia.ira..n
rWn. %area of �u Wp, pu6lit and p.i.at. admh,y
earSi W ldlaood edrseri¢n centers (daY cwe urrera
mad a-aarwh btk ¢t ¢•d ar¢tttadbnel ¢aer
Arrro-<urxne+cla4 t¢ka eM to .r Nh ¢F rrr.ke
¢ h¢dd+.Q _Irl, r.r¢...,,�.r r¢¢r¢•iM of
Pppr i•n , )500 p. 1r. O%1oe/A80/F6.
Muatriol ua�a .Irh r.v.ln..n rr`gk-6uildlaq loe.rl.
¢1 a Pwxir•w1<ir 20,000 a¢. 11.
5-30
a e atpiet: min, al 3 - 3 pn.n P•eln•cd
Neighborhood Model Principles
Projects located within the Development Areas are reviewed for consistency with each of the
Neighborhood Model Principles found in the Comprehensive Plan. Comments are provided
below on relevant aspects of the Neighborhood Model. Revised comments may be given after
additional information is submitted.
Pedestrian Orientation
This principle is met. This area of the Southern and Western
Development Area is gradually becoming more walkable and
connected. The proposed pedestrian path provides at least
the same level of connectivity and access. Sidewalks are
provided throughout Spring Hill Village which connect to the
proposed multi -use path along Avon Street Extended.
Mixture of Uses
This principle is not applicable. A mixture of uses is provided
with the NMD development. This principle was addressed
with the approval of ZMA2013-17.
Neighborhood Centers
This principle is not applicable. The development is not
located in a Center.
Mixture of Housing Types
This principle is not applicable. This principle was addressed
and Affordability
with the approval of ZMA2013-17.
Relegated Parking
This principle is not applicable. This principle was addressed
with the approval of ZMA2013-17.
Interconnected Streets and
This principle is met. The proposed 8' pedestrian pathway
Transportation Network
provides at least the same level of connectivity as the
previously approved sidewalk.
Multimodal Transportation
This principle is met. There is pedestrian and vehicular
Opportunities
connectivity between Avon Street Extended and Route 20
through Spring Hill Village. There may be a future bus stop at
the entrance to Spring Hill Village at Avon Street Extended.
Parks, Recreational
This principle is not applicable. This principle was addressed
Amenities, and Open Space
with the approval of ZMA2013-17. The proposed multi -use
path (instead of sidewalk) is more consistent with the nearby
character and with other recently approved developments
along Route 20.
Buildings and Spaces of
This principle is not applicable. This principle was addressed
Human Scale
with the approval of ZMA2013-17.
Redevelopment
This principle is not applicable.
Respecting Terrain and
Careful Grading and
Additional information is needed. Provide conceptual
grading for review.
Regrading of Terrain
Clear Boundaries between
This principle is met. A pedestrian pathway is more in
the Development Areas and
character with the area and recently approved developments
the Rural Area
along Route 20, as opposed to a sidewalk.
Action after Receipt of Comments
This application has been tentatively scheduled for Planning Commission public hearing for July
14, 2020. Staff will follow up with options for resubmittal and public hearings.
Resubmittal
If you choose to resubmit, please use the attached form. There is no fee for the first
resubmittal. The resubmittal date schedule and other related resources are provided for your
convenience online at
https://www.albemarle.org/department.asp?department=cdd&relpage=15259
Notification and Advertisement Fees
Additional notification fees will not be required unless a deferral takes place and adjoining
owners need to be notified of a new date.
Community Meeting
Prior to requesting a public hearing with the Planning Commission and Board, a community
meeting must be held in accordance with Zoning Ordinance Section 18-33.37. This requirement
has been fulfilled with letters mailed to properties within a 500-foot radius on June 5, 2020.
Feel free to contact me if you wish to meet or need additional information. My email address is
vkanellopoulos(a-�albemarle.org
Sincerely,
Tori Kanellopoulos
Senior Planner
Community Development
434-296-5832 ext. 3270
vkanellopoulos@albemarle.org
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Stephen C. Brich, P.E. 1401 East Broad Street (804) 786-2701
Commissioner Richmond, Virginia 23219 Fax: (804) 786-2940
June 09, 2020
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Attn: Tori Kanellopoulos
Re: Spring Hill Village — Proffer Amendment
ZMA-2020-0006
Review # 1
Dear Ms. Kanellopoulos:
The Department of Transportation, Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use
Section, has reviewed the above referenced plan as submitted by Stanley Martin Companies,
LLC., dated 20 April 2020, and find it to be generally acceptable. Note; any outstanding issues
on plans submitted thus far are viewed as minor and can be addressed through the plan process.
If further information is desired, please contact Willis Bedsaul at 434-422-9866.
A VDOT Land Use Permit will be required prior to any work within the right-of-way. The
owner/developer must contact the Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use
Section at (434) 422-9399 for information pertaining to this process.
Sincerely,
Adam J. Moore, P.E.
Area Land Use Engineer
Charlottesville Residency
VirginiaDOT.org
WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING