The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutARB202000012 Review Comments Final Site Plan and Comps. 2020-06-12COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 Phone (434) 296-5832 June 12, 2020 Scott Collins Collins Engineering 200 Garrett Street, Suite K Charlottesville, VA 22902 Fax (434) 972-4126 RE: ARB-2020-12: Brookhill — Block 8B — Final (TMP: 04600-00-00-01800 & 04600-00-00- 0 1 9A2) Dear Mr. Collins, We have received revised site plans and architectural plans for the above -noted application that address the conditions of approval the Architectural Review Board requested at its March 2, 2020 meeting. The following revisions are requested to make the proposal consistent with those conditions as well as the Entrance Corridor design criteria. 1. Revise the scales specified on sheet 16 to match the scale of the drawing. Rev. 1: Comment not vet fully addressed. Revise the vertical scale to match the measurements shown on the vertical axis. It appears that the vertical scale is also 1 "=50'. However, it is listed as 1 "=5', both in the title block and on the graphic scale block. 2. Revise the elevations to include dimensions including the proposed heights. Rev. 1: Comment not vet fully addressed. Dimensions has been provided on the elevations submitted, but the elevations submitted do not include Building #1 which would be the one most visible from the EC and the one provided in the previous submission. Either specify that Building #1 is identical to one of the building elevations provided (2, 7, 8 & 9) or provide the elevation for Building #1 and ensure that all elevation related comments including the proposed heights dimensions are included in them. 3. Revise the building elevations to label all materials. If colors will be selected by future owners, add a note to the architectural drawings stating that the same color cannot be used for adjacent units. Rev. 1: Comment not vet fully addressed. Labels for the general building materials, and a note about the same colors not being used, has been provided on the elevations submitted. However, the elevations submitted do not include building #1 which would be the one most visible from the EC and the one provided in the previous submission. Either specify that Building #1 is identical to one of the building elevations provided (2, 7, 8 & 9) or provide the elevation for Building #1 and ensure that all elevation related comments, including labels for the aeneral buildina materials and about the same colors not beina used are included in it. 4. Provide material and color samples for brick. Rev. 1: Comment not yet fully addressed. Submit a physical sample of the St. Louis brick option. A photograph of the three brick options for Brookhill Blk 8B has been provided. The County already has physical samples for two of the three colors, but a physical sample for the St. Louis color is still reauired. 5. Ensure all mechanical equipment is shown and labeled on the site plan, roof plan, and building elevations. If roof -mounted mechanical equipment is proposed, show the placement and proposed heights of mechanical units. Show how all visibility of mechanical equipment from the EC will be eliminated. Rev. 1: Comment not vet fully addressed. It does not appear that any of what appear to be HVAC units behind the residential units are labeled. Ensure all mechanical equipment, including HVAC units, is shown and labeled on the site plan. Specify on the comment response letter which pages of the site plan show the labels for the HVAC units. 6. If above -ground utilities are proposed, provide these and their easements on revised site plans. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. Comment response letter states all aboveground proposed utilities are shown on the site plan. 7. Provide details on the pergolas, label them in the elevations, and show them in the roof plan. Rev. 1: Comment not yet fully addressed. Pergolas have been shown and labeled in the revised elevations provided, but the following still needs to be addressed: a) Either specify that Building #1 is identical to one of the building elevations provided (2, 7, 8 & 9) or provide an elevation of building #1 showing and labeling the pergolas. b) No revised roof plan was submitted. Revise the roof plans to show the pergolas. c) Provide a detail of the pergola. 8. Include the mechanical equipment note on the revised site plans and architectural drawings: Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. Note that the mechanical note aaolies to all mechanical eauioment. includina the HVAC units. and not iust items that would be housed in the mechanical room. 9. Include the standard lighting note in the site plan: Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp that emits 3,000 or more initial lumens shall be a full cutoff luminaire and shall be arranged or shielded to reflect light away from adjoining residential districts and away from adjacent roads. The spillover of lighting from luminaires onto public roads and property in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall not exceed one half footcandle. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 10. Provide one more large shade tree along the east side of Wesley Lane. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 11. Provide tree protection fencing and labels in the grading plan. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 12. Identify on the plan the proposed material and color for the retaining walls. Anchor Diamond Pro "James River" is recommended. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. Within 15 days of the date of this letter, please send me a letter (by email is acceptable) indicating whether you will or will not proceed with these revisions. If you choose not to proceed with these revisions, staff will be unable to approve your application. If you choose to proceed with the revisions, please forward me two set of revised drawings together with a memo summarizing the revisions you've made. Your decision to make the revisions will suspend the 60-day review period associated with your original submittal. However, I expect to complete the review of your revised proposal within 2 weeks of your re -submittal. If you have any questions about this action, please contact me as soon as possible. I look forward to receiving your revisions and completing this review with an approval letter. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Paty Saternye Senior Planner CC: Charles Haugh & EJ Oglesby, Jr. C/O Altus Group 435 Park Street Charlottesville, VA 22901 File COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development REVISED APPLICATION SUBMITTAL This form must be returned with your revisions to ensure proper tracking and distribution. County staff has indicated below what they think will be required as a resubmission of revisions. If you need to submit additional information please explain on this form for the benefit of the intake staff. All plans must be collated and folded to fit into legal size files, in order to be accepted for submittal. TO: Paty Saternye DATE: PROJECT NAME: ARB2020-12 Brookhill Block 813 — Final Site Plan Submittal Type Requiring Revisions () indicates submittal Cade County Project Number # Copies Erosion & Sediment Control Plan (E&S) Mitigation Plan MP Waiver Request WR Stormwater Management Plan SWMP Road Plan RP Private Road Request, with private/public comparison PRR Private Road Request — Development Area PRR-DA Preliminary Site Plan PSP Final Site Plan (or amendment) (FSP) Final Plat FP Preliminary Plat PP Easement Plat EP Boundary Adjustment Plat BAP Rezoning Plan (REZ) Special Use Permit Concept Plan SP-CP Reduced Concept Plan R-CP Proffers P Bond Estimate Request BER Draft Groundwater Management Plan (D-GWMP) Final Groundwater Management Plan F-GWMP Aquifer Testing Work Plan ATWP Groundwater Assessment Report GWAR Architectural Review Board (ARB) ARB202000012 1 + digital Other: Please explain (For staff use only) Submittal Code # Copies Distribute To: Submittal Code # Copies Distribute To: ARB 1 + digital Paty Saternye