Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUB202000071 Review Comments Final Plat 2020-06-13Phone (434) 296-5832 Project: Project file number: Plat preparer: Owner or rep.: Plan received date: Date of comments: Reviewer: Project Coordinator: COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Fax (434) 972-4126 Final Plat review Berkmar Overlook Subdivision Plat SUB2020-00071 Brian D. Jamison, LS — Roudabush, Gale, & Assoc., Inc. / Engineering 172 South Pantops Drive, Suite A, Charlottesville, VA 22911 [ biamison(d)roudabush.coml Berkmar Development, LLC / 2496 Old Ivy Road, Charlottesville, VA 22903 29 Apr 2020 13 Jun 2020 John Anderson Paty Saternye Engineering has reviewed the final plat and offers the following comments. V2 1. Unclear how this plat may be approved without simultaneously extinguishing (graphically) boundary lines of existing parcels held by Berkmar Development, LLC (TMP 45-85, 45-84A, 45-112171, 45-112F2). Note, for example, Open Space D and A cross Ex. boundaries, which may introduce uncertainty concerning assignment to residue parcel/s once development is subdivided. Engineering defers to Planning. 2. In addition to IF@104.33' label, provide bearing and distance labels for 104.33' boundary line segment. 3. Provide 481.60'(T) label for line segments bearing N70'26'0I"W. V3 4. It seems unusual that fenced cemeteries might count as `open space.' Engineering defers to Planning. 5. Please use a different arc endpoint symbol to distinguish from line segment endpoints. For example, 164.02' segment traverses lots 37-41 with 0.34' and 12.60' lengths extending across portions of adjacent lots, while at the other end of this row of lots (N end Swede Street), C6 may or may not define boundaries of Lots 31 to 34. Avoid a single symbol that in one instance may indicate a line endpoint, while in another, an arc endpoint. Different symbols may help a great deal. Additional comments, V4-V6, are possible. V4 6. Recommend parenthetical (T) distance for arcs spanning multiple lot boundaries: C14, 16, 19, 25 (V5), for example. 7. Provide bearings for Emergency Access Parcel segments measuring 60.53' and 64.93'. 8. V5: Provide inset detail for 0.34' tie, Lot 36. V7 9. Provide deed bk.-pg. reference to recorded third -party Retaining Wall Maintenance Agreements, unless Agreements are to be recorded with this final plat. Engineering defers to Planning, but needs to confirm that Agreements for walls crossing parcel boundaries are recorded. Wall easements are not dedicated to public use. Albemarle is not party to retaining wall maintenance agreements. 10. Recommend revise New Public Utility Easement labels which appear to apply to both ACSA sanitary and waterline easements with conventional labels reading ACSA Sanitary Easement, and ACSA Waterline easement. Distinct ACSA labels are informative to agencies and property owners relative to lots, boundaries, type of utility, and location of utility types, relative to one another. Engineering defers to Engineering Review Comments Page 2 of 2 Planning /ACSA, but finds proposed new public utility easement labels to be generic, non -descriptive, and for this reason, of minimal use. 11. Revise /relocate 54.41' tie at E end of wall and maintenance easement crossing Lots 24-28 such that tie is between a property or parcel boundary and a corner of the wall easement (one end or other of 18.00' line segment), similar to 45.50' tie provided for wall easement crossing Lots 22 and 23. 12. If wall and maintenance easement crosses any portion of Lot 28, provide inset detail for that portion of the wall easement that lies on Lot 28. 13. Provide landscape easement endpoints for 36.18' and 39.98' segments crossing lots 15 -17. 14. Provide inset detail for portion of new variable width landscape maintenance easement that lies on Lot 15. 15. Provide endpoints for new public utility easement line segments on Lot 47. 16. Check variable width sight distance easement in Open Space B, which has a line break south of Lot 31. It is unclear why a sight distance easement would break. 17. Revise 22.45' tie (new public utility easements), Marsac cul-de-sac, to tie to lot, open space, or emergency access parcel boundaries, not to one another. V8 18. Copy V7 SWM easement line and curve labels to V8 such that sheet V8 defines the SWM easement with certainty. Engineering understands the intent is not to overwhelm any single sheet of the plat with too much data, but believes that will not be the case with the SWM easement. 19. Provide SWM easement endpoints between 88.49' and 85.96' line segments, west edge of easement. 20. New 10' private drainage easements (multiple): Provide line segment endpoints, all easements. 21. Ensure plat defines /labels SWM facility access easement. If access is included in SWM easement on V8, please confirm. 22. Label unlabeled private drainage easements —`Typ' label appears slightly inadequate. 23. Provide Note on V7 and V8 that reads: `Reference bearing - distance information on sheets V4, V5, V6.' Please feel free to call if any questions: 434.296-5832 -0069. Thank you SUB202000071 Berkmar Overlook FPT 061320