HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUB201900158 Review Comments Road Plan and Comps. 2020-06-15COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126
Road and Drainage plan review
Project title:
Spring Hill Village Road Plan
Project file number:
SUB201900158
Plan preparer:
Collins Engineering [scott@collins-engineering.com]
Owner or rep.:
Spring Hill Development, LLC
Stanley Martin Homes[odonnellgp@stanleymartin.com]
Date Received:
07 Oct 2019
Rev. 1 Received:
09 March 2020
Rev. 2 Received:
08 May 2020
Date of comments:
27 Nov 2019
Rev. 1 Comments:
20 April 2020
Rev. 2 Comments:
15 June 2020
Scott,
We have reviewed the above referenced plans and have the following comments:
Engineering (Emily Cox)
1. Professional seal should be signed and dated. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
2. Provide detail for driveway entrances in the alley with the roll-top curbing: Figure B-22
http://www.virginiadot.org/business/resources/appendb.pdf
Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
3. Provide transitioning detail for roll top curbing in front of inlets. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
4. Topography should be at least visually field verified within the last year. Cover sheet says Aug
2018. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
5. Ensure all sheets provide a North arrow (one example, Sheet 8 is missing). Rev. 1: It
appears Sheet 4 is still missing one. Please double check all sheets. Rev. 2: Comment
addressed.
6. Provide horizontal curve information (start points, end points) on plan view. Radii were shown.
Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
7. Ensure all necessary pavement markings are shown. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
8. Street trees should be placed as far away from storm sewer as possible and should not be
touching. Trees in front of lots 69-70 are too close. There may be others. Rev. 1: Tree in front of
lot 60 is still too close to a structure. Also, please review the tree at the southern end of
Berwyn Lane, it appears to be in a storm easement and close to a pipe. Rev. 2: Comment
addressed.
9. Show existing managed slopes on all applicable sheets, not just existing conditions. Rev. 1:
Comment addressed.
10. Double check all contour labels. One in the open space should be 550 and is labeled 540. Rev. 1:
Comment addressed.
11. Show the SWM facility easement (and any other easements). Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
12. Ensure ADA requirements are met. All necessary crossings do not appear to be shown. Rev. 1:
Comment addressed.
Engineering Review Comments
Page 2 of 3
13. Provide signed and sealed retaining wall plans, especially for the alley, where the walls are
very close to adjacent property. Please note that retaining walls will need building permits.
Rev. 1: Comment not addressed. Rev. 2: Comment addressed.
14. The minimum drainage easement width is 20ft. Some loft are shown on this plan. Rev. 1:
Comment addressed. This will be further evaluated with WPO or site plan, since this does
not apply to the roads.
15. Will the 5ft pathway throughout the site have an easement/deed? Provide a type and thickness on
the detail for the asphalt. (Sheet 10). Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
16. Sight distance lines cannot go through parking spaces. Also, ensure the correct required sight
distances are shown for all intersections. Rev. 1: A small portion of one parking space on
Berwyn lane appears to conflict with the sight distance line from Loyola Way. Rev. 2:
Comment addressed.
17. Sidewalk detail should specify concrete that is 3000 psi at 28 days or stronger. Rev. 1: Comment
addressed.
18. YD4A-YD4 has a velocity over the 15 ft/s maximum allowed by the County. Rev. 1: Comment
addressed.
19. Ensure all proffers and conditions associated with the ZMA are addressed. These are outlined in
planning comments from Chris Perez. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. These are reviewed by
planning.
20. Rev. 1: WPO plan (WPO201900042) must be amended to match this plan and must be
approved before road plan can be approved. Rev. 2: WPO must be approved before road
plan can be approved.
21. Rev. 1: Please provide signs or traffic calming measures on Berwyn Lane. Rev. 2: Comment
addressed.
22. Rev. 1: There are sanitary lines in the middle of private roads. Ensure that manholes are
not located within vehicular wheel paths and that tops are flush (or slightly lower) than the
top of the asphalt. Rev. 2: Comment addressed.
23. Please show and clarify driveway aprons. All roll-top and CG-6 aprons must be shown and noted
on the plan and details must be provided and referenced. Rev. 2: Comment addressed.
24. Clearly delineate the changes from public to private right-of-way lines. Rev. 2: Comment
addressed.
25. Label sidewalk widths. Rev. 2: Comment addressed.
26. Rev. 2: Please show sight distance lines and profile at the intersection of Loyola way and the
alley.
Planning (Daniel Butch)
1. Based on a current corridor study of Avon St Extended, the draft plan identifies a 10 foot asphalt
shared -use path on Avon St Extended. The Development Concept Plan identifies a 8 foot
concrete sidewalk. Recommendation is for a 10 foot asphalt shared -use path on Avon St
Extended.
Requested Changes:
1. Extend all sidewalks/shared-use paths on Avon St Extended and Scottsville Rd to
property line.
2. Sidewalk on Scottsville Rd on both sides of entrance to be 8 foot concrete sidewalk.
Rev. 1: No objection.
Planning (Chris Perez, Rev. 1: Tori Kanellopoulos)
1. See attached comment letter dated 11/8/19. Rev. 1: See attached comment letter dated
3/30/2020. Rev. 2: See attached comment letter dated 6/15/2020.
Engineering Review Comments
Page 3 of 3
VDOT (Adam Moore)
1. See attached comment letter dated 11/26/19. Rev. 1: See attached comment letter dated
4/10/2020. Rev. 2: See attached comment letter dated 6/10/2020.
Fire Rescue (Shawn Maddox)
1. No objection. Rev. 1: No objection.
ACSA (Jeremy Lynn)
1. Currently under review per email dated 11/19/19. Rev. 1: No objections.
GIS (Andrew Slack, Rev. 1: Brian Becker)
1. The applicant should contact this office with a list of three (3) proposed road names to replace
"Warkwick Court". There is an existing road named "Warwick Court" and the similarities
between these road names could cause problems for emergency response. Rev. 1: No objection.
ARB (Margaret Maliszewski)
1. Landscaping must be consistent with ARB approved landscaping. A final ARB site plan submittal
is required. Rev. 1: Landscaping must be consistent with ARB approved landscaping. A final
ARB site plan is under review. Rev. 2: Comment not addressed.
Engineering plan review staff are available from 2-4 PM on Thursdays, should you require a meeting to
discuss this review.
If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me either by email (ecox2@albemarle.org) or by
phone at 434-296-5832 ext. 3565.
Sincerely,
Emily Cox, P.E.
Civil Engineer II
:z v�
�'IRGSi31P
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memorandum
To: Emily Cox — CDD Engineering
From: Tori Kanellopoulos — CDD Planning
Division: Planning Services
Date: June 15, 2020
Subject: SUB201900158 — Spring Hill — Road Plan (latest rev. date 05-05-20)
The following are Planning comments for Road Plan submittal SUB201900158:
Planning (Tori Kanellopoulos):
1. 14-410 Street standards. Show limits of public ROW adjacent to Berwyn Lane
and Dauphin Drive.
gx D.1. ATERLINE
MH-xo
NE�j ------
J4�sa
2. Comment. Remove label of "Loyola Way" between Lots 16 and 14. This should
be a private ROW/alley per the Application Plan (as is labeled).
LOTI
-STOP SIGN (TYP.)
/—LIMITS OF FUHLIC ROAD RrW \
3, 4�1 9
3LOYOLA WAY
���� PROPOSEOALLEY
3v PRIVATE R)W
4ag/
STREET 41cn rlvr] �
LOT a
i5
3. ZMA201300017 Application Plan. The 30' private street easement should only
extend from Lots 28-16. The application plan shows an Alley for Lots 15-1, not a
private street.
- NCAmAINTENMCF FMEMEN11N 3—K .7
CT VIDE FOR PERIMETE0.1AND5[APING ALLEY CROSS
ANIA�NT—R
v uNry t, IJITY iL
o0.ERTv eouvoAFr STREET CRO55 Oh II iiF. COnrvIC ic
SERIONF SERIONF
_____ .—_ _—_—_—_ PRIVATE ALLE'�
PRIVATESTREET—--------i -
W� I(I No SECH SECTION
BLOCKC
EONp
4. ZMA201300017, Proffer #4, SR 742 (Avon St Ext). The applicant is responsible
to design, bond, and construct the improvements shown on the County -approved
engineering drawings titled Development Concept Plan, Sheet 4, dated 10-21-13
and last revised on 8-29-14, as prepared by Alan Franklin PE, for both SR 20
(Scottsville Road) and SR 742 (Avon St Ext). The following proffer requirements
are still not met or shown on the Road Plan:
a. Include the following note, which has been included for SR 20, but not SR
742: "Existing overhead utilities along the frontage of this property shall be
removed and installed underground. All associated poles shall be
removed."
5. 18-32.7 Required easements. Provide the DB and PG for the recorded
easements approved with SUB201900079 (on TMP 91A1-C, owned by Avinity
Estates) and SUB201900082 (on TMP 90-35V owned by Ronayne LLC). These
easements are approved, not proposed.
a. Additionally, grading is now shown on TMP 91-16A1. Per approved
easement plat SUB201900079, no work was shown on this parcel. Revise
to remove grading from adjacent parcel or submit letter of approval from
parcel owner.
b. Revise note on Sheet 1 that reads "No offsite easements are proposed
with this development." Offsite easements are required for this
development.
Advisory Comments
1. Advisory comment. Planning review of this Road Plan is for comments specific
to Road Plan requirements only. Planning approval of the Road Plan does not
constitute subdivision plat or site plan approval; Planning has not reviewed this
Road Plan for other requirements such as setbacks, minimum lot size, open
space, etc.
a. Recommend check Sheet 1 notes against most recent site plan and
subdivision plat submittals. A few notes appear to be incorrect (e.g.
Phasing and Non-residential setbacks).
2. Advisory comment. The final plat will need to meet the requirements of 14-235
and will need a maintenance agreement meeting the requirements of 14-317.
a. Additionally, street trees/required landscaping shown on individual lots will
need landscaping easements.
3. Advisory comment. A private street maintenance agreement has been provided
with the submittal of the final plat SUB202000064 and will be reviewed with the
plat. Approval of the private street maintenance agreement will be required prior
to final plat approval.
6. Advisory Comment. A retaining wall still is shown on Lot 75; however, they
have been moved off of individual lots for the final site plan.
Please contact Tori Kanellopoulos in the Planning Division at
vkanellopoulos(a-albemarle.org or 434-296-5832 ext. 3270 for further information.
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Stephen C. Brich, P.E. 1401 East Broad Street (804) 786-2701
Commissioner Richmond, Virginia 23219 Fax: (804) 786-2940
June 10, 2020
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Attn: Emily Cox, P.E.,
Re: Spring Hill Village — Final Road Plans
SUB-2019-0015 8
Review #
Dear Ms. Cox:
The Department of Transportation, Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use
Section, has reviewed the above referenced plan as submitted by Collins Engineering, dated 4
October 2019, revised 17 March 2020, and offer the following comments:
1. The CG-12s should be aligned and the stop bars moved back. I also don't know that the
crosswalk needs to be marked here.
2. The 8' sidewalk shown is greater than what VDOT will maintain. This can be covered by
a note that the HOA will maintain as part of the landscaping permit.
3. The right of way dedication needs to be conveyed by deed to the Commonwealth of
Virginia and recorded in the clerk's office of Albemarle County.
If further information is desired, please contact Adam Moore at 434-422-9782.
A VDOT Land Use Permit will be required prior to any work within the right-of-way. The
owner/developer must contact the Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use
Section at (434) 422-9399 for information pertaining to this process.
Sincerely,
Adam J. Moore, P.E.
Area Land Use Engineer
Charlottesville Residency
VirginiaDOT.org
WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING