The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSDP201800003 Review Comments Letter of Revision 2 2020-07-06COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126 July 6, 2019 Kendra Patrick Shimp Engineering 912 East High Street Charlottesville, VA 22902 kendra(a-)-shimp-engineering.com RE: LOR #2 SDP2018-03 Hansen Road Church — Letter of Revision Dear Kendra Patrick: Your Letter of Revision application has been reviewed. In order for the amended site plan to be approved the following revisions are required: [ZMA 2018-2 Proffer #1] Please note that the proffer states: • that the "Owner shall dedicate a non-exclusive easement on and across the pedestrian path for public use." and that • "The property owner shall maintain the path improvements...." Based upon the zoning previous comment (and email on 6/5/2020), and the wording of the proffer, the order for approvals will be as follows: a) The LOR is approved showing the proposed trail improvements but no easement. b) The trail is built to meet all of the requirements specified in the proffer. c) The trail is surveyed, and its exact location and width is determined and verified. d) An easement plat is submitted showing the exact location of the 6' easement over the as built location of the trail. A maintenance agreement is drafted, submitted with the easement plat and approved with the owner of the parcel maintaining the trail, guaranteeing the maintenance of the path and ZMA compliance. The easement plat is approved and then both the plat and the maintenance agreement are recorded. e) The CO for the building can be issued. [ZMA 2018-2 Proffer #1] Although it is not included in the submitted LOR #2 request letter, the letter of revision narrative added #5 that states "Note: Upon completion of path, its location must be surveyed and a 6 FT access easement must be recorded around its exact location." The note is appropriate, and directly relates to the approval process specified by zoning, but address the following: a) Move the note to the notes area of the cover sheet instead of just being included I the Letter of Revision Narrative. This is not a change with the LOR but a requirement in the approval process prior to the certificate of occupancy. b) Revise the entry in the "Letter of Revision Narrative:" to instead specify that the note has been added to the cover sheet. 3. [32.5.20), (k) & 32.6.2(e)] Revise the Site Plan and Grading Plan sheets so that they: a) No longer show the previously proposed location of the storm drainage structure along Hansen Road. b) That the labels for the proposed structure are moved to the revised location 4. [32.5.2(n) & 32.6.2(i)] Address the following in reference to the revisions to the handicapped parking spaces at the front entrance to the building: a) Revise the parking space to be a full 18' deep. b) Revise the remaining parking space, adjacent to the sidewalk that is at the same level as the parking area, to have a bumper/stop block or revise the sidewalk width to be 6'. 5. [32.5.2(n), 32.7.2.3(b) & (c)] Provide a pedestrian connection between the upper level of the staircase from Hansen Road and the church. 6. [32.5.2(p) & 32.6.20)] Revise the following in reference to the street trees along Rolkin Road and the adjoining landscaping: a) Revise the location of the street trees along Rolkin Road that were not adjusted when the section of the trail adjacent to them was moved closer to the road. The seven trees are now 11 or more feet from the trail and 17' from the curb. They should be located no further from the trail than 5' unless there is a conflict with a storm drain, or utility, that necessitates an increased distance. b) Revise the location of the trees located to the bottom right corner of the retaining wall for the future building location. There are two white pines, one southern magnolia, a sweet gum, a white oak and a redbud in very close proximity to two of the relocated street trees. Since the street trees are required to be large shade trees, and five out of six of the non -street trees adjacent are large, they should not be planted in such close proximity to each other. Allow a minimum of 25' between the relocated large shade street trees and other large trees. Please note, these trees are part of the landscaping plan approved by the Thomas Jefferson Foundation (TJF) to mitigate the view from Monticello. Therefore, the relocation of these trees should still be in the same general vicinity to avoid any need for further review from TJF. 7. [Comment] Revise the LOR request letter, and the Letter of Revision Narrative, to adjust for all changes necessitated as specified above. 8. [Comment] Attached please find the comments from the other reviewers. Approval from all reviewers is required before approval of the LOR. In accord with the provisions of Section 32.4.3.5 of Chapter 18 of the Code if the developer fails to submit a revised final site plan to address all of the requirements within six (6) months after the date of this letter the application shall be deemed to have been voluntarily withdrawn by the developer. If you have any questions about the comments please feel free to contact me at Dsaternve(a)albemarle.ora or at 434-296-5832 ext. 3250. Sincerely, Paty Saternye Senior Planner Planning Division CC: Point Church,1428 Greenbrier Place, Charlottesville, VA 22901(daveherrinq(a-)thepointcville.com) Review Comments for DP 0 �180000 Final Site Development Plan Project Name: HANEN ROAD CHURCH - FINAL Date Completed: Monday, July 06, 2020 DepartmentlaivisionlAgency: Review Sys: Reviewer: Michael Dellinger CDD Inspections Requested Changes Relocation of accessible features requires a building permit to verify code compliance_ Need seven (7) accessible spaces, two () of which need to be jean accessible_ All accessible parking spaces, access isles, and accessible route shall be installed in accordance with ICC ANSI All 7.1-09_ Accessible parking spaces shall be located on the shortest accessible route of travel from adjacent parking to an accessible building entrance_ In parking facilities that do not serve a particular building, accessible parking spaces shall be located on the shortest route to an accessible pedestrian entrance to the parking facility- Where buildings have multiple accessible entrances with adjacent parking, accessible parking spaces shall be dispersed and located near the accessible entrances_ At least one accessible route shall connect accessible buildings, accessible facilities, accessible elements and accessible spaces that are on the same site_ If a passenger loading zone was created then additional requirements are required under Chapter 5 of the referenced code above_ Page: County of Albemarle Printed On: 071061 20€ 0 Page: 1 COUnti of A.1bemarle Printed On: 0710212020 Review Comments for SDP201800003 lFinal Site Development Plan Project Name: HANEN ROAD CHURCH - FINAL Date Completed: Thursday, June 18, 2020 DepartmentlDivisionfAgency: Review Sys: Reviewer: Emily fox _E CDD Engineering Requested Changes Nd -Please provide signed engineered drawings for the retaining wall- -Retaining wall will need building permit- -Please confirm the location of storm Al matches the location on the WPO amendment_ n Page: County of Albemarle Printed On: 0710 20 �� 0 0