Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB202000077 Staff Report 2020-07-08r .914111YYXQ1U109DIVA I . :l �30W2;3DI07;711 Project #/Name ARB-2020-77: D.S. Tavern Final Site Plan Review Type Final review of a Site Development Plan and architectural design Parcel Identification 059000000015A0 Location 3449 Ivy Road Zoned Commercial (C1) /Rural Area, Entrance Corridor (EC) Owner/Applicant Ivy Road RE LLC/FGS Design, LLC. (Catherine Carter Davis) Magisterial District Samuel Miller Proposal To renovate the historic DS Tavern, including demolishing existing additions and replacing them with new additions as well as associated site improvements on approximately 2.02 acres. Context The subject property is located along the south side of Route 250 surrounded by primarily Rural Area zoned residential parcels with commercial parcels to the west and adjacent to the east (59-15A1). Visibility The proposed development will be readily visible from the Entrance Corridor. ARB Meeting Date July 6, 2020 Staff Contact Khris Taggart Figure 1: Google image (left) showing property along the Entrance Corridor and County GIS map (right) highlighting subject property. PROJECT HISTORY The ARB completed a preliminary review of this proposal on May 11, 2020. Comments provided at that meeting are included in the Analysis section of this report. Changes have been made to the architectural elevation facing the Route 250 Entrance Corridor and to the landscaping of the site. The site plan includes two parcels — 59-15A and 59-15A1. Changes are only proposed to the parcel on which the D.S. Tavern is located — 59-15A. Consequently, this review does not address 59-15A1. ANALYSIS REF GUIDELINE ACTIONS 5/11/20 ISSUE 7/6/20 RECOMMENDATIONS 7/6/20 GENERAL GUIDELINES Compatibility with significant historic sites and the character of the Entrance Corridor: 1 The goal of the regulation of the design of development Revise the design of the hyphen to The design of the hyphen has been revised to None. within the designated Entrance Corridors is to ensure that demonstrate sensitivity to the demonstrate sensitivity to the adjacent historic new development within the corridors reflects the adjacent historic structures with a structures. (See Figure 2 and 3) traditional architecture of the area. Therefore, it is the smaller form and appropriate purpose of ARB review and of these Guidelines, that detailing. The height of the proposed hyphen has been reduced proposed development within the designated Entrance to a height that is closer to that of the existing hyphen. Corridors reflect elements of design characteristic of the This smaller form reduces the emphasis on the significant historical landmarks, buildings, and structures hyphen. Additionally, although the porch has not been of the Charlottesville and Albemarle area, and to promote eliminated, it has been reduced to a form that is orderly and attractive development within these corridors. minimal in nature. The revisions allow the historic Applicants should note that replication of historic structures tavern and summer kitchen to retain their status as the is neither required nor desired. primary structures when viewed from the Entrance Corridor. The Virginia Department of Historic 2 Visitors to the significant historical sites in the Charlottesville and Albemarle area experience these sites Resources (VDHR) has stated that if the work is as ensembles of buildings, land, and vegetation. In order executed as shown, D. S. Tavern will retain its to accomplish the integration of buildings, land, and eligibility for listing. (See Attachment 2.) vegetation characteristic of these sites, the Guidelines The two-story rear addition briefly mentioned in the require attention to four primary factors: compatibility previous staff report has also been revised. The with significant historic sites in the area; the character of addition as originally proposed may have had the Entrance Corridor; site development and layout; and compatibility issues. These issues were not addressed landscaping. in the previous staff report because the addition is not expected to be visible from the EC. 3 New structures and substantial additions to existing structures should respect the traditions of the architecture of historically significant buildings in the Charlottesville and Albemarle area. Photographs of historic buildings in the area, as well as drawings of architectural features, which provide important examples of this tradition are contained in Appendix A. 4 The examples contained in Appendix A should be used as a guide for building design: the standard of compatibility with the area's historic structures is not intended to impose a rigid design solution for new development. Replication of the design of the important historic sites in the area is neither intended nor desired. The Guideline's standard of compatibility can be met through building scale, materials, and forms which may be embodied in architecture which is contemporary as well as traditional. The Guidelines allow individuality in design to accommodate varying tastes as well as special functional requirements. 5 It is also an important objective of the Guidelines to establish a pattern of compatible architectural characteristics throughout the Entrance Corridor in order to achieve unity and coherence. Building designs should demonstrate sensitivity to other nearby structures within the Entrance Corridor. Where a designated corridor is substantially developed, these Guidelines require striking a careful balance between harmonizing new development with the existing character of the corridor and achieving compatibility with the significant historic sites in the area. 9 Building forms and features, including roofs, windows, doors, materials, colors and textures should be compatible with the forms and features of the significant historic buildings in the area, exemplified by (but not limited to) the buildings described in Appendix A [of the design guidelines]. The standard of compatibility can be met through scale, materials, and forms which may be embodied in architecture which is contemporary as well as traditional. The replication of important historic sites in Albemarle County is not the objective of these guidelines. 10 Buildings should relate to their site and the surrounding context of buildings. 11 The overall design of buildings should have human scale. Scale should be integral to the building and site design. 12 Architecture proposed within the Entrance Corridor should use forms, shapes, scale, and materials to create a cohesive whole. 13 Any appearance of "blankness" resulting from building None at this time. There is no "blankness" resulting from building None. design should be relieved using design detail or design in the proposed additions. vegetation, or both. 14 Arcades, colonnades, or other architectural connecting None. An updated hyphen is being used to connect the two None. devices should be used to unify groups of buildings within historic buildings. a development. 15 Trademark buildings and related features should be None. The proposed hyphen does not reflect any trademark None. modified to meet the requirements of the Guidelines. design. 16 Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should not be None. Notes on the drawings indicate that new windows are None. highly tinted or highly reflective. Window glass in the to match existing, which are not tinted. Entrance Corridors should meet the following criteria: Visible light transmittance (VLT) shall not drop below 40%. Visible light reflectance (VLR) shall not exceed 30%. Specifications on the proposed window glass should be submitted with the application for final review. Accessory structures and equipment 17 Accessory structures and equipment should be integrated Indicate on the site plan the The ground mounted equipment will be located near Provide a fence detail in the plan. into the overall plan of development and shall, to the locations of all ground mounted the east and south end of the existing historic summer extent possible, be compatible with the building designs equipment. kitchen. The equipment appears to be screened from used on the site. view by wood fencing; however, details have not been provided for the proposed fence. 18 The following should be located to eliminate visibility from the Entrance Corridor street. If, after appropriate siting, these features will still have a negative visual impact on the Entrance Corridor street, screening should be provided to eliminate visibility. a. Loading areas, b. Service areas, c. Refuse areas, d. Storage areas, e. Mechanical equipment, f. Above -ground utilities, and g. Chain link fence, barbed wire, razor wire, and similar security fencing devices. 19 Screening devices should be compatible with the design of the buildings and surrounding natural vegetation and may consist of. a. Walls, b. Plantings, and c. Fencing. 21 The following note should be added to the site plan and the Add the standard mechanical The note is present on the site plan; however, it is still Add the standard mechanical architectural plan: "Visibility of all mechanical equipment equipment note to the architectural not present on the architectural plan. equipment note to the architectural from the Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated." plan. plan. 20 Surface runoff structures and detention ponds should be None. There are no proposed stormwater facilities with this None. designed to fit into the natural topography to avoid the need project. for screening. When visible from the Entrance Corridor street, these features must be fully integrated into the landscape. They should not have the appearance of engineered features. 44 Natural drainage patterns or to the extent required, new drainage patterns) should be incorporated into the finished site to the extent possible. Lighting 22 Light should be contained on the site and not spill over Provide photometric diagrams for The photometric plan shows light values (as high as Revise the photometric plan so that onto adjacent properties or streets; the light fixtures. 1.02 fc) that spill over onto the adjacent street. no light value over .5 fc spills over onto the adjacent street. 23 Light should be shielded, recessed or flush -mounted to eliminate glare. All fixtures with lamps emitting 3000 Some lighting details have been provided. The lumens or more must be full cutoff fixtures. proposed lighting that has been identified is not expected to exceed 3000 lumens. Clearly indicate in the plans that the 2700K color temperature has been 24 Light levels exceeding 30 foot-candles are not appropriate for display lots in the Entrance Corridors. Lower light chosen for the Kingston Wall levels will apply to most other uses in the Entrance The highest value shown on the lighting plan is 8.84 Lantern and the ground -mounted Corridors. fc, which is well below the maximum. fixture. 25 Light should have the appearance of white light with a Provide manufacturer's cut sheets warm soft glow; however, a consistent appearance that indicate lamp type, wattage, Each of the light fixtures is available with lamps that throughout a site or development is required. and color temperature for each emit a warm white light, but the option isn't clearly Consequently, if existing lamps that emit non -white light proposed fixture. indicated for the Kingston Wall Lantern or the are to remain, new lamps may be required to match them. ground -mounted fixture. 26 Dark brown, dark bronze, or black are appropriate colors None. None. for free-standing pole mounted light fixtures in the There are no freestanding pole mounted light fixtures Entrance Corridors. proposed in the site plan. The proposed exterior building light fixtures are dark bronze/copper and are 27 The height and scale of freestanding, pole -mounted light fixtures should be compatible with the height and scale of appropriate for the historic character of the building. the buildings and the sites they are illuminating, and with the use of the site. Typically, the height of freestanding pole -mounted light fixtures in the Entrance Corridors should not exceed 20 feet, including the base. Fixtures that exceed 20 feet in height will typically require additional screening to achieve an appropriate appearance from the Entrance Corridor. 28 In determining the appropriateness of lighting fixtures for the Entrance Corridors, the individual context of the site will be taken into consideration on a case by case basis. 29 The following note should be included on the lighting Provide photometric diagrams for The note is not present on the lighting plan. Add the standard lighting note to the plan: "Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp that the light fixtures. photometric plan. emits 3,000 or more initial lumens shall be a full cutoff luminaire and shall be arranged or shielded to reflect light away from adjoining residential districts and away from adjacent roads. The spillover of lighting from luminaires onto public roads and property in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall not exceed one half foot-candle." Guidelines or the Use o Decorative Landscape Lighting 30 Light used for decorative effect shall: Provide manufacturer's cut sheets Lighting details have been provided; however, options Add the lighting diagrams/cut sheets a. be compatible with the character of the Entrance for the proposed landscape lighting have not been identified for the landscape lights and to the site plan. Clearly indicate the Corridor. Compatibility of exterior lighting and lighting and note the location of the fixture the locations of the proposed fixtures have not been lumens emitted by each lamp. fixtures is assessed in terms of design, use, size, scale, in the plans. noted on the lighting plan. Identify the options chosen for the color, and brightness. landscape lights. b. impact only the immediate site. The effect of the Provide notes on the plan A note has been provided on the plan that indicates illumination should not be discernible from distances indicating that the landscape that the landscape lighting meets timing, glare, cutoff, Show proposed fixture locations on along the Entrance Corridor. lighting meets the timing, glare, cutoff, intensity, and color intensity, and color requirements. However, the specific requirements are not included in the note. the lighting plan. 31 Where used for decorative effect, outdoor light fixtures shall: requirements. Revise the note to include the a. be equipped with automatic timing devices and shall be specific requirements for decorative extinguished between the hours of 11:00 p.m. and dawn. landscape lighting. b. be shielded and focused to eliminate glare. Glare control shall be achieved primarily through the use of such means as cutoff fixtures, shields and baffles, and appropriate application of mounting height, wattage, aiming angle, fixture placement, etc. c. be cutoff luminaires, aimed so as not to project their output beyond the objects intended to be illuminated; or non -cutoff luminaires, equipped with glare shields, visors, barn doors, and/or other similar shielding accessories as required to meet the following criteria: Light distribution from all lighting installations shall be cut-off at all angles beyond those required to restrict direct illumination to within the perimeter of the landscape feature being illuminated. d. never exceed 3,000 lumens. Further restrictions on lumens may be imposed by the ARB. e. not be modified to reflect seasonal colors. f. be of a number that is compatible with the scale of the object and the development to be illuminated, such that the light emitted will not over -illuminate or overpower the site, as determined by the ARB. Landscaping 7 The requirements of the Guidelines regarding landscaping Consider replacing the row of The row of shrubs along the frontage has been None. are intended to reflect the landscaping characteristic of shrubs along the frontage with a removed and the landscape plan has been revised to many of the area's significant historic sites which is more informal planting consistent show additional trees and shrubs interspersed between characterized by large shade trees and lawns. Landscaping with the nearby context. the existing flowering ornamental trees located in the should promote visual order within the Entrance Corridor western part of the lawn. The addition of these and help to integrate buildings into the existing planting further contributes to the informal environment of the corridor. landscaping that is typical of the surrounding context. 8 Continuity within the Entrance Corridor should be obtained by planting different types of plant materials that share similar characteristics. Such common elements allow for more flexibility in the design of structures - because common landscape features will help to harmonize the appearance of development as seen from `. the street upon which the Corridor is centered. 32 Landscaping along the frontage of Entrance Corridor streets should include the following: - a. Large shade trees should be planted parallel to the --� Entrance Corridor Street. Such trees should be at least 3 %2 Y inches caliper (measured 6 inches above the ground) and should be of a plant species common to the area. Such m trees should be located at least every 35 feet on center. b. Flowering ornamental trees of a species common to the area should be interspersed among the trees required by the preceding paragraph. The ornamental trees need not Original Proposed Landscape Plan. February 28, 2020 alternate one for one with the large shade trees. They may be planted among the large shade trees in a less regular spacing pattern. c. In situations where appropriate, a three or four board fence or low stone wall, typical of the area, should align the frontage of the Entrance Corridor street. d. An area of sufficient width to accommodate the foregoing plantings and fencing should be reserved parallel to the Entrance Corridor street, and exclusive of road right-of-way and utility easements. 33 Landscaping along interior roads: None. The interior road is located on the adjoining parcel None. a. Large trees should be planted parallel to all interior (TMP 59-15A1). roads. Such trees should be at least 2%2 inches caliper (measured six inches above the ground) and should be of a plant species common to the area. Such trees should be located at least every 40 feet on center. 34 Landscaping along interior pedestrian ways: None. A paver walkway is proposed between the parking None. a. Medium trees should be planted parallel to all interior and the building, with connections to the house pedestrian ways. Such trees should be at least 2%2 inches located to the west and to the rear addition. A tree is caliper (measured six inches above the ground) and should located at the west end of the walkway. be of a species common to the area. Such trees should be located at least every 25 feet on center. 35 Landscaping of parking areas: Provide a complete planting Based on the current number of parking spaces Revise the planting schedule to show a. Large trees should align the perimeter of parking areas, schedule in the site plan. provided (9), one interior tree is required and has been planting sizes. located 40 feet on center. Trees should be planted in the provided. interior of parking areas at the rate of one tree for every 10 parking spaces provided and should be evenly distributed throughout the interior of the parking area. b. Trees required by the preceding paragraph should measure 2'/2 inches caliper (measured six inches above the ground); should be evenly spaced; and should be of a species common to the area. Such trees should be planted in planters or medians sufficiently large to maintain the health of the tree and shall be protected by curbing. c. Shrubs should be provided as necessary to minimize the parking area's impact on Entrance Corridor streets. Shrubs should measure 24 inches in height. 36 Landscaping of buildings and other structures: Provide a complete planting A combination of ground cover (St. John's Wort), a. Trees or other vegetation should be planted along the schedule in the site plan. shrubs (Boxwood, Aucuba, Sweetbox), and trees front of long buildings as necessary to soften the (Crape Myrtle, Blackhaw) are proposed along the appearance of exterior walls. The spacing, size, and type fagade; however, the proposed sizes have not been of such trees or vegetation should be determined by the provided. length, height, and blankness of such walls. b. Shrubs should be used to integrate the site, buildings, and other structures; dumpsters, accessory buildings and structures; "drive thru" windows; service areas; and signs. Shrubs should measure at least 24 inches in height. 37 Plant species: Almost all the plant species listed in the plant Consider substituting locally native a. Plant species required should be as approved by the schedule on the landscape plan (Sheet C-04A) are species for the non-native plants Staff based upon but not limited to the Generic Landscape included in the County's approved plant lists. proposed. Plan Recommended Species List and Native Plants for However, the Stewartia monodelpha, Aucuba Virginia Landscapes (Appendix D). japonica "Emily Rose", Cephalotaxus harringtonia "Duke Gardens", and Rhododendron chinoides are non -natives. The use of native species, and especially those native to the Virginia Piedmont regions, are encouraged for biodiversity reasons. 38 Plant health: Add the standard plant health note The note is present on the landscaping plan. None. The following note should be added to the landscape plan: to the landscaping plan. "All site plantings of trees and shrubs shall be allowed to reach, and be maintained at, mature height; the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall be pruned minimally and only to support the overall health of the plant." Site Development and layout Development pattern 6 Site development should be sensitive to the existing None. The site has already been developed. The proposal is None. natural landscape and should contribute to the creation of to leave much of the existing landscaping in front and an organized development plan. This may be behind the tavern unchanged. accomplished, to the extent practical, by preserving the trees and rolling terrain typical of the area; planting new trees along streets and pedestrian ways and choosing species that reflect native forest elements; insuring that any grading will blend into the surrounding topography thereby creating a continuous landscape; preserving, to the extent practical, existing significant river and stream valleys which may be located on the site and integrating these features into the design of surrounding development; and limiting the building mass and height to a scale that does not overpower the natural settings of the site, or the Entrance Corridor. 39 The relationship of buildings and other structures to the Revise the plans to clearly identify The plans have been revised to clearly identify all None. Entrance Corridor street and to other development within all trees to remain. trees to remain. the corridor should be as follows: a. An organized pattern of roads, service lanes, bike paths, Revise the plans to identify the The row of screening shrubs along the western and pedestrian walks should guide the layout of the site. existing row of shrubs along the perimeter has not been identified on the existing b. In general, buildings fronting the Entrance Corridor west side of the parcel on the conditions plan, but it is identified as existing street should be parallel to the street. Building groupings existing conditions plan and landscaping that is to remain on the landscape plan. should be arranged to parallel the Entrance Corridor street. identify it as to remain on the c. Provisions should be made for connections to adjacent landscape plan. pedestrian and vehicular circulations stems. 10 d. Open spaces should be tied into surrounding areas to provide continuity within the Entrance Corridor. e. If significant natural features exist on the site (including creek valleys, steep slopes, significant trees or rock outcroppings), to the extent practical, then such natural features should be reflected in the site layout. If the provisions of Section 32.5.2.n of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance apply, then improvements required by that section should be located so as to maximize the use of existing features in screening such improvements from Entrance Corridor streets. f. The placement of structures on the site should respect existing views and vistas on and around the site. Site Grading 40 Site grading should maintain the basic relationship of the None. There are no changes proposed to the existing site None. site to surrounding conditions by limiting the use of grading. retaining walls and by shaping the terrain through the use of smooth, rounded landforms that blend with the existing terrain. Steep cut or fill sections are generally unacceptable. Proposed contours on the grading plan shall be rounded with a ten -foot minimum radius where they meet the adjacent condition. Final grading should achieve a natural, rather than engineered, appearance. Retaining walls 6 feet in height and taller, when necessary, shall be terraced and planted to blend with the landscape. 41 No grading, trenching, or tunneling should occur within the Show the tree protection fencing Tree protection fencing is shown on the landscape None. drip line of any trees or other existing features designated on the landscape plan. plan. for preservation in the final Certificate of Appropriateness. Adequate tree protection fencing should be shown on, and coordinated throughout, the grading, landscaping and erosion and sediment control plans. 42 Areas designated for preservation in the final Certificate of Appropriateness should be clearly delineated and protected on the site prior to any grading activity on the site. This protection should remain in place until completion of the development of the site. 43 Preservation areas should be protected from storage or movement of heavy equipment within this area. 1.10UTIuMM&$]a;3MOUVIuID1e117.111to] ►KI Staff recommends the following as the primary points of discussion: 1. The revised architectural design of the hyphen. 2. The landscaping along the EC. Staff recommends approval with the following revisions: 1. Provide a fence detail in the plan. 2. Add the standard mechanical equipment note to the architectural plan: "Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated." 3. Revise the photometric plan so that no light value over .5 fc spills over onto the adjacent street. 4. Clearly indicate in the plans that the 2700K color temperature has been chosen for the Kingston Wall Lantern and the ground -mounted fixture. 5. Add the standard lighting note to the photometric plan: "Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp that emits 3,000 or more initial lumens shall be a full cutoff luminaire and shall be arranged or shielded to reflect light away from adjoining residential districts and away from adjacent roads. The spillover of lighting from luminaires onto public roads and property in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall not exceed one half foot-candle." 6. Add the lighting diagrams/cut sheets to the site plan. Clearly indicate the lumens emitted by each lamp. Identify the options chosen for the landscape lights. 7. Show proposed fixture locations on the lighting plan. 8. Revise the note to include the specific requirements for decorative landscape lighting: a. be equipped with automatic timing devices and shall be extinguished between the hours of 11:00 p.m. and dawn. b. be shielded and focused to eliminate glare. Glare control shall be achieved primarily through the use of such means as cutoff fixtures, shields and baffles, and appropriate application of mounting height, wattage, aiming angle, fixture placement, etc. c. be cutoff luminaires, aimed so as not to project their output beyond the objects intended to be illuminated; or non -cutoff luminaires, equipped with glare shields, visors, barn doors, and/or other similar shielding accessories as required to meet the following criteria: Light distribution from all lighting installations shall be cut-off at all angles beyond those required to restrict direct illumination to within the perimeter of the landscape feature being illuminated. d. never exceed 3,000 lumens. Further restrictions on lumens may be imposed by the ARB. e. not be modified to reflect seasonal colors. f. be of a number that is compatible with the scale of the object and the development to be illuminated, such that the light emitted will not over -illuminate or overpower the site, as determined by the ARB. 9. Revise the planting schedule to show planting sizes. 10. Consider substituting locally native species for the non-native plants proposed. 11. Please note that payment of the ARB fee ($1075) is needed before final approval. 12 TABLE A This report is based on the following submittal items: Architectural Plan Sheet # Drawing Name Drawing Date/Revision Date A-000.0 Title Sheet 5/26/20 SP-100.0 Existing Site Plan 5/26/20 SP-101.0 Proposed Site Plan 5/26/20 EX-100.0 Existing Basement Plan 5/26/20 EX-101.0 Existing First Floor Plan 5/26/20 EX-102.0 Existing Second Floor Plan 5/26/20 A-103.0 Proposed First Floor Plan 5/26/20 A-104.0 Proposed Second Floor Plan 5/26/20 A-105.0 Roof Plan 5/26/20 A-200.0 Existing Elevations 5/26/20 A-201.0 Existing Elevations 5/26/20 A-202.0 Proposed Elevations 5/26/20 A-203.0 Proposed Elevations 5/26/20 A-204.0 Proposed Sections 5/26/20 A-205.0 Proposed Sections 5/26/20 A-600.0 Proposed Elevation — Material Keys 5/26/20 A-601.0 Proposed Elevation — Material Keys 5/26/20 Site Plan Sheet # Drawing Name Drawing Date/Revision Date GO Title Sheet 5/26/20 C-02 General Notes 5/26/20 C-03 Existing Conditions 5/26/20 C-04 Overall Site Plan 5/26/20 C-04A Landscaping Plan 5/26/20 C-04B Site Lighting Plan 5/26/20 C-05 Grading / E&SC Plan 5/26/20 C-06 Construction Details 5/26/20 C-07 Landscaping Details 5/26/20 13 E PROPO58L7 NORTH 8LEVA710N Figure 2: Original Proposed North Elevation. February 28, 2020 d6w-'-- 34i� i l Aww- A"w- IXL" Figure 3: Revised Proposed North Elevation. May 26, 2020 14 ��',��'�- fl r�'_ � - =-:v:� _�?^__+=--- •-�-----------'•�ae.�n mare ,ru' � + f r 4 f' Ir 4 ti - f f+ ,r F gnu rwur mou +-rc.....: mJr I ---------- ---------------- ----_-.- - ._____.____JlociR ---------- .l f---.../ ------------ � � rmnsm:.hA7lMY!kiTM9.'!!�::h.4H.i-11T.•hkY4�!!0�r' , :rs r , i" + •'-'�f4 k fAMM—L--�.-e- e.. f r�crwrxwrere�w:---''---'M°-."Fk. --�,.a r= a+.s.ir.wwvee �_Ilwe/rLF4w/riY'litl�oni�C_y'__dak•Iine71tl111/__.:..I ~',k;�M1 l }` f-tleMwiw�d6inAYiArr[-_�-7riA�e�J¢Mltthow�.l. r_ -__-JCFkrY[te!-...... _y------- -any`,__tleSfxh!Y--- ____ ti f-ti- .__Al6N.cppllpiAIERI®.LIR,gY/c i r Figure 4: Revised Landscaping Plan. 5/26/20 15 rrwr:TO:IUTIOWIIV 1. D. S. Tavern National Register Nomination 2. D. S. Tavern VDHR Letter Applicant's Submittal: 3. D. S. Tavern Architectural Drawings and Site Plan 4. D. S. Tavern Site Lighting Information 16