HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUB201900158 Review Comments Road Plan and Comps. 2020-07-23� AI
�h
�lRGIN�P
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126
Project title:
Project file number:
Plan preparer:
Owner or rep.:
Date Received:
Rev. 1 Received:
Rev. 2 Received:
Rev. 3 Received:
Date of comments:
Rev. 1 Comments:
Rev. 2 Comments:
Rev. 3 Comments:
Scott,
Road and Drainage plan review
Spring Hill Village Road Plan
SUB201900158
Collins Engineering [scott@collins-engineering.com]
Spring Hill Development, LLC
Stanley Martin Homes[odonnellgp@stanleymartin.com]
07 Oct 2019
09 March 2020
08 May 2020
23 June 2020
27 Nov 2019
20 April 2020
15 June 2020
23 July 2020
We have reviewed the above referenced plans and have the following comments:
Engineering (Emily Cox)
1. Professional seal should be signed and dated. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
2. Provide detail for driveway entrances in the alley with the roll-top curbing: Figure B-22
http://www.virginiadot.org/business/resources/appendb.pdf
Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
3. Provide transitioning detail for roll top curbing in front of inlets. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
4. Topography should be at least visually field verified within the last year. Cover sheet says Aug
2018. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
5. Ensure all sheets provide a North arrow (one example, Sheet 8 is missing). Rev. 1: It
appears Sheet 4 is still missing one. Please double check all sheets. Rev. 2: Comment
addressed.
6. Provide horizontal curve information (start points, end points) on plan view. Radii were shown.
Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
7. Ensure all necessary pavement markings are shown. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
8. Street trees should be placed as far away from storm sewer as possible and should not be
touching. Trees in front of lots 69-70 are too close. There may be others. Rev. 1: Tree in front of
lot 60 is still too close to a structure. Also, please review the tree at the southern end of
Berwyn Lane, it appears to be in a storm easement and close to a pipe. Rev. 2: Comment
addressed.
9. Show existing managed slopes on all applicable sheets, not just existing conditions. Rev. 1:
Comment addressed.
10. Double check all contour labels. One in the open space should be 550 and is labeled 540. Rev. 1:
Comment addressed.
11. Show the SWM facility easement (and any other easements). Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
Engineering Review Comments
Page 2 of 3
12. Ensure ADA requirements are met. All necessary crossings do not appear to be shown. Rev. 1:
Comment addressed.
13. Provide signed and sealed retaining wall plans, especially for the alley, where the walls are
very close to adjacent property. Please note that retaining walls will need building permits.
Rev. 1: Comment not addressed. Rev. 2: Comment addressed.
14. The minimum drainage easement width is 20ft. Some loft are shown on this plan. Rev. 1:
Comment addressed. This will be further evaluated with WPO or site plan, since this does
not apply to the roads.
15. Will the 5ft pathway throughout the site have an easement/deed? Provide a type and thickness on
the detail for the asphalt. (Sheet 10). Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
16. Sight distance lines cannot go through parking spaces. Also, ensure the correct required sight
distances are shown for all intersections. Rev. 1: A small portion of one parking space on
Berwyn lane appears to conflict with the sight distance line from Loyola Way. Rev. 2:
Comment addressed.
17. Sidewalk detail should specify concrete that is 3000 psi at 28 days or stronger. Rev. 1: Comment
addressed.
18. YD4A-YD4 has a velocity over the 15 ft/s maximum allowed by the County. Rev. 1: Comment
addressed.
19. Ensure all proffers and conditions associated with the ZMA are addressed. These are outlined in
planning comments from Chris Perez. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. These are reviewed by
planning.
20. Rev. 1: WPO plan (WPO201900042) must be amended to match this plan and must be
approved before road plan can be approved. Rev. 2: WPO must be approved before road
plan can be approved. Rev. 3: Comment not addressed, however approval is almost
complete.
21. Rev. 1: Please provide signs or traffic calming measures on Berwyn Lane. Rev. 2: Comment
addressed.
22. Rev. 1: There are sanitary lines in the middle of private roads. Ensure that manholes are
not located within vehicular wheel paths and that tops are flush (or slightly lower) than the
top of the asphalt. Rev. 2: Comment addressed.
23. Please show and clarify driveway aprons. All roll-top and CG-6 aprons must be shown and noted
on the plan and details must be provided and referenced. Rev. 2: Comment addressed.
24. Clearly delineate the changes from public to private right-of-way lines. Rev. 2: Comment
addressed.
25. Label sidewalk widths. Rev. 2: Comment addressed.
26. Rev. 2: Please show sight distance lines and profile at the intersection of Loyola way and the
alley. Rev. 3: Comment addressed.
Planning (Daniel Butch)
1. Based on a current corridor study of Avon St Extended, the draft plan identifies a 10 foot asphalt
shared -use path on Avon St Extended. The Development Concept Plan identifies a 8 foot
concrete sidewalk. Recommendation is for a 10 foot asphalt shared -use path on Avon St
Extended.
Requested Changes:
1. Extend all sidewalks/shared-use paths on Avon St Extended and Scottsville Rd to
property line.
2. Sidewalk on Scottsville Rd on both sides of entrance to be 8 foot concrete sidewalk.
Rev. 1: No objection.
Rev. 3: No objection.
Engineering Review Comments
Page 3 of 3
Planning (Chris Perez, Rev. 1& on: Tori Kanellopoulos)
1. See attached comment letter dated 11/8/19. Rev. 1: See attached comment letter dated 3/30/2020.
Rev. 2: See attached comment letter dated 6/15/2020. Rev. 3: See attached comment letter
dated 7/15/2020.
VDOT (Adam Moore)
1. See attached comment letter dated 11/26/19. Rev. 1: See attached comment letter dated
4/10/2020. Rev. 2: See attached comment letter dated 6/10/2020. Rev. 3: See attached letter
dated 7/23/20.
Fire Rescue (Shawn Maddox)
1. No objection. Rev. 1: No objection. Rev. 3: No objection.
ACSA (Jeremy Lynn)
1. Currently under review per email dated 11/19/19. Rev. 1: No objections. Rev. 3: No
objection.
GIS (Andrew Slack, Rev. 1: Brian Becker)
1. The applicant should contact this office with a list of three (3) proposed road names to replace
"Warkwick Court". There is an existing road named "Warwick Court" and the similarities
between these road names could cause problems for emergency response. Rev. 1: No objection.
Rev. 3: No objection.
ARB (Margaret Maliszewski)
1. Landscaping must be consistent with ARB approved landscaping. A final ARB site plan submittal
is required. Rev. 1: Landscaping must be consistent with ARB approved landscaping. A final
ARB site plan is under review. Rev. 2: Comment not addressed. Rev. 3: Review of this proposal
is ongoing. It is anticipated that comments will be available the week of 7/27.
Engineering plan review staff are available from 2-4 PM on Thursdays, should you require a meeting to
discuss this review.
If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me either by email (ecox2@albemarle.org) or by
phone at 434-296-5832 ext. 3565.
Sincerely,
Emily Cox, P.E.
Civil Engineer II
0
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memorandum
To: Emily Cox — CDD Engineering
From: Tori Kanellopoulos — CDD Planning
Division: Planning Services
Date: July 15, 2020
Subject: SUB201900158 — Spring Hill — Road Plan (latest rev. date 06-16-20)
The following are Planning comments for Road Plan submittal SUB201900158:
Planning (Tori Kanellopoulos):
1. Comment. Ensure that road plan ROW and final site plan/final plat ROW match.
The final site plan and final plat appear to have the same ROW's:
PROPOSE06LU I
PLANING STRIP zj
PROPOSED S'
ONCRETE SYCE5FT LOT
SIDEWALK
5 PBOnOtiF IT LO
CG6,TVP: 2_
{� is PEAR SETE
rNa `LOT
zl
LOT*
sP ]0
N ^ LOT
Final Site Plan: �9_ Road Plan:
A�
Final Site Plan:
22
LOT 66'
21
LOT 66'
2 20
66'
LOT
,o.° PmT6
o �.m
B SlQE'N�v
Ear "d °a"' 3 $5
S v°'�'�'
TRION
m.w s
BLOCK C
:.Menc.. Road Plan:
2 ,
LEY
mvmEos' ^
sor Fai 5O^EMK L LC
,--Rm>I ro.c.nes«w
4 LO
�Po _BLOCKC ae
/RO
...,m8,3-39AC -
2. 18-32.7.9.5 and COD Street trees and planting strips. Some street trees on
Dauphin Drive are located in the open space, instead of the planting strip. The
COD and application plan for the ZMA show street trees located within planting
strips. The COD allows for street trees to be located outside of planting strips if it
is not feasible to locate utilities otherwise. Indicate if it is infeasible to have trees
within the planting strip. Otherwise, revise and move street trees (for public
streets) to be within the planting strip.
(3)
Advisory Comments
1. Advisory comment. Planning review of this Road Plan is for comments specific
to Road Plan requirements only. Planning approval of the Road Plan does not
constitute subdivision plat or site plan approval; Planning has not reviewed this
Road Plan for other requirements such as setbacks, minimum lot size, open
space, etc.
2. Advisory comment. The final plat will need to meet the requirements of 14-235
and will need a maintenance agreement meeting the requirements of 14-317.
a. Additionally, street trees/required landscaping shown on individual lots will
need landscaping easements.
3. Advisory comment. A private street maintenance agreement has been provided
with the submittal of the final plat SUB202000064 and will be reviewed with the
plat. Approval of the private street maintenance agreement will be required prior
to final plat approval.
Please contact Tori Kanellopoulos in the Planning Division at
vkanelloaoulosta)albemarle.org or 434-296-5832 ext. 3270 for further information.
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Stephen C. Brich, P.E. 1401 East Broad Street (804) 7862701
Commissioner Richmond, Virginia 23219 Fax: (804) 7862940
July 23, 2020
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Attn: Emily Cox, P.E.,
Re: Spring Hill Village — Final Road Plans
SUB-2019-00158
Review #5
Dear Ms. Cox:
The Department of Transportation, Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use
Section, has reviewed the above referenced plan as submitted by Collins Engineering, dated 4
October 2019, revised 16 June 2020, and offer the following comment:
1. The right of way dedication needs to be conveyed by deed to the Commonwealth of
Virginia and recorded in the clerk's office of Albemarle County.
If further information is desired, please contact Adam Moore at 434-422-9782.
A VDOT Land Use Permit will be required prior to any work within the right-of-way. The
owner/developer must contact the Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use
Section at (434) 422-9399 for information pertaining to this process.
Sincerely,
Adam J. Moore, P.E.
Area Land Use Engineer
Charlottesville Residency
VirginiaDOT.org
WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING