HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP202000013 Review Comments Final Site Plan and Comps. 2020-07-3000UNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (434) 296-5832
Memorandum
To: Scott Collins, Collins Engineering (scott@collins-engineering.com)
Riverbend Development (alan@riverbenddev.com)
From: Mariah Gleason
Division: Community Development — Planning
Date: March 30, 2020
Revision 1: May 28, 2020
Revision 2: July 30, 2020
Subject: SDP202000013 Foothill Crossing V — Final Site Plan (digital submittal)
The final site plan referenced above has been reviewed by the Planning Services Division of the Albemarle County Department
of Community Development (CDD) and by other members of the Site Review Committee (SRC).
The Planner will approve the plan when the following items (from the Planner and from other SRC plan reviewers) have been
satisfactorily addressed and when all SRC plan reviewers have indicated in writing their tentative approvals. [Each comment is
preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.]
1. [32.5.2(a)] Reflect new application. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
a. Revise the application project ID to SDP202000013.
b. Update the REVISIONS title block section to remove revisions that were part of the previous application.
c. List the date of the initial submittal for this plan (should be 2/3/2020).
2. [32.5.2(b)] Scales. Check scales on all sheets. It appears that the higher values do not scale correctly when measured with a
scale bar. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
3. [32.5.2(b), 32.5.2(n), 4.16] Recreation areas
a. The required square footage of recreation areas for this development should be 6,200sf (200sf x 31units =
6,200sf). The proposed tot lot is 4,450sf Revise the plan to meet or exceed this requirement. See Sec. 4.16 for
more information. Rev. 1: Per our discussion on 5/28/20, please revise the passive recreation aspects to create
more of a looped amenity that ties into and incorporates the tot lot recreation area. Please be aware that any
pathways on private properties will need to be accompanied by access easements. As is typical, easement areas
will need to be shown and noted with deed book and page number prior to final site plan approval. Rev. 2:
Comment satisfied.
b. The zoning ordinance requires that recreation areas be located in a way that they are compatible with adjoining
uses. The tot lot's current proximity to the SWM facility does not comply with this requirement. Revise the
plan such that the tot lot is appropriately placed. Rev. 1: Please see the attached letter from Megan Nedostup
and revise the plan to provide greater separation between these two site plan elements. Rev. 2: Comment
satisfied.
c. The site plan must demonstrate a suitable means of access to the tot lot. Given the current design, a fence must
be established on both sides of the pathway leading to the tot lot to ensure that users feel able and comfortable
using the accessway. Rev. 1: Please see the attached letter from Megan Nedostup and revise the plan to
incorporate one of the suggested options. Rev. 2: Comment satisfied.
d. This tot lot will be required to be fenced. Indicated fenced areas with a label.
e. The plan should clearly demonstrate that at least two (2) climbers are provided. Other minimum equipment
requirements appear to be meet.
f. Note: If alternative recreation areas will be proposed in order to meet the minimum size requirement, the
applicant must submit a request to the Planning Department for review/approval. The request must state why
an alternative is proposed and provide a justification. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. A substitution request
for the proposed development was received by the County. The letter was dated January 31, 2020 but
was not received until March 31, 2020, via email.
4. [32.6.2, 32.7.9] Landscape plan
a. This development does not need to meet the requirements of 32.7.9.6 Landscaping Within A Parking Area.
Remove this information from the plan. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
b. The proposed passive recreation area, and possibly pathway if any clearing is intended, cannot be counted
towards the tree canopy requirements for this development. Revise the plan to clearly demonstrate that the tree
canopy in the northern comer of the property is not inclusive of the proposed passive recreation area. Rev. 1:
Comment may still be valid. It was not clear on the plan what the subtracted acreage of 0.897ac represented.
Can you clarify? Rev. 2: Comment not yet satisfied. Wooded areas within the stream buffer areas can be
subtracted from the minimum tree canopy coverage requirement, however, staff was only able to
confirm that approximately 26,000sf of the stream buffer area will be preserved as wooded areas, not
34,650 as the plan currently notes. Review and revise accordingly.
c. On Sheet 11, review Note 3. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
i. The Required Street Trees should be 51 trees ((1,970/40 + 1 (at the starting point) = 51).
ii. The Proposed Street Trees should total to 53 trees, not 55.
d. Per Comment 4c, update the Plant Legend to reflect that there are 53 Pin Oaks being provided, not 54. Rev. 1:
Comment addressed.
e. Per Comment 4b and 4d, update the resulting Canopy Coverage and Total Canopy, Rev. 1: See response to
Comment 4b above. Also, based on the implied calculation, the Total Canopy noted in the Plant Schedule chart
should be 38,860sf. The math seems to be off on the Evergreen Tree species. Please review and revise. Rev. 2:
Comment satisfied.
f. Per Comment 4e, it does not appear that the development is currently meeting the canopy requirement of 20%.
Review and revise the plan to meet this requirement. Rev. 1: See response to Comments 4b and 4e. Rev. 2:
Comment not yet satisfied. The Total Canopy appears to have a calculation error. The resulting sum
should be 42,300sf, instead of 43,312sf as the plan currently notes. Revise the planting schedule and
calculations to meet the tree canopy requirement.
g. There is a conflict between the location of a Nellie R Stevens Holly and the patio of Lot 1. Revise. Rev. 1:
Comment add
h. [Based on revised plan dated 06/02/20201 Remove or adjust the "Proposed Primitive Trailway" label
within Open Space C since this improvement has been relocated.
5. [32.5.2(i), 32.5.2(s)] Connection to other developments. The application plan for ZMA201600005 and the initial site plan
for this development showed a pedestrian connection to other phases of the Glenbrook/Foothill development. Thank you for
providing information regarding the intended tie in of the emergency access facility. In addition:
a. Demonstrate how the pedestrian facilities from this development will tie into existing or plated pedestrian
facilities of other phases (reference deed book and page). Rev. 1: Comment still applies. Thank you for
providing references, however I was not able to confirm with these references that the approved roadway on
parcel TMP 56-57B 1 extends to the location shown on the plan. The approved right-of-way instead appears to
terminate further north. As such:
i. Please adjust the emergency accessway to coordinate with approved and platted roadways. (Note: The
applicant may want to coordinate with Roudabush, Gale & Associates on this road design as they
recently submitted a plat for the emergency access easement.)
ii. Please review and revise the legal reference to instead reference the recorded roadway plat (should be
DB 5075 PG 664). Update labels on all sheets accordingly.
Rev. 2: Comment satisfied.
b. In addition to the emergency access label, also label this facility as a pedestrian/bike pathway on the
neighboring parcel. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
c. Include bollards on both ends of the emergency access and pedestrian/bike facility. Rev. 1: Comment still
applies. Similar to the response to Comment 5a., please relocate the bollards on TMP 56-57B 1 to the
terminating point/end of the platted right-of-way. Rev. 2: Comment not yet satisfied. If tie-in details for the
emergency roadway will be included on the Sheet 5: Grading & Drainage Plan Sheet, reference that
sheet in the emergency roadway labels on Sheet 3: Site Plan. Then, on Sheet 5, echo the information
provided in the Road Plan regarding the bollard placement at the end of Glenbrook Phase I until the
construction of the roadways platted with DB 5057 PG 664 are complete, at which point the bollards will
be moved to the location shown at the end of the constructed "Dedicated Right -of -Way".
d. [Based on revised plan dated 3/30/20] On Sheet 3, I could not confirm the reference to SUB2018-23. Please
remove this label or provide the recorded deed instrument. Rev. 2: Comment addressed.
e. [Based on revised plan dated 3/30/20] A recorded legal instrument (deed book and page number) for the
proposed emergency access easement will need to be shown and noted on the plan prior to final site plan
approval. Rev. 2: Comment satisfied.
f [Based on revised plan dated 06/02/20201 On Sheet 2, remove the linework and notes shown on TMP 56-
57D. The noted road plan, SUB2014-187, is approved but shows a different street layout (see approved
plan sheet attached). If this layout was approved by an amendment to the road plan, note the
amendment. If not, remove or label the linework as `future proposed improvements" instead.
g. [Based on revised plan dated 06/02/20201 On Sheets 2-5, remove the linework and notes shown on TMP
56-57B1. As similarly commented on the road plans, no plan or recorded instrument was found to verify
these improvements. As such, remove or label the linework as `future proposed improvements" instead.
6. [32.5.2(n)] Retaining wall. Per new County Policy, retaining walls crossing properties need to be self -supported and end at
the property line or maintenance agreements will be needed. Rev. 1: A recorded legal instrument (deed book and page
number) for the proposed retaining wall easement will need to be noted on the plan prior to final site plan approval. An
easement plat for this improvement has not been submitted to the County for review/approval yet, but could be incorporated
into the existing subdivision plat for this development which is currently under review by the County. The applicant may
want to coordinate with Roudabush, Gale & Associates, the applicant for the subdivision plat. Rev. 2: Comment not yet
satisfied. An easement for the retaining wall maintenance area is not included on the plats that have been submitted
for this development. Coordinate with Roudabush, Gale & Assoc. to provide have this easement included on the plat
for the subject property.
[32.5.2(n), 32.7.2.3] Sidewalks. Provide sidewalk facilities on the south side of Indigo Road or submit a waiver request to
use the path provided by Claudius Crozet Park in lieu of a southern sidewalk facility. A waiver request will need to be
approved by the Planning Commission and agreed to by the owner of Claudius Crozet Park, Rev. 1: Please see the attached
letter from Megan Nedostup and submit an exception, in accordance with Sec. 14-422(E), to the requirements of Sec. 14-
422(A). Please be aware, this comment will be moved to the Road Plan comments and will need to be resolved with the
review/approval of that plan (SUB202000021). Rev. 2: Comment addressed. The sidewalk modification request was
approved by the Planning Commission on June 16, 2020. An action letter for that decision will be provided to the
applicant when it is available.
8. [32.5.2(a)] Setbacks. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
a. List the non-infill side minimum and maximum setback requirements for this property.
b. List the required Building Separation as a separate line item
9. [32.5.2(b)] Impervious surface. The impervious area calculations on the Cover Sheet should also account for residential
walkways, residential patios, pedestrian trailways/accessways, and the emergency accessway. Demonstrate or clarify that
these improvements are also included in the impervious area calculation. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
10. [32.5.2(n)] Building dimensions.
a. Since building sides differ in length, provide dimensions for all sides of a typical villa unit. Rev. 1: Comment
addressed.
b. Provide typical dimension details for villa units without patios (i.e. structures in place of patios). Rev. 1:
Comment addressed.
c. [Based on revised plan dated 3/30/20] On the dimension vignette for Villa Unit Type B, dash or remove the
line between the "Sumoom or Patio" and the rest of the house. This representation could lead to confusion
with housing types on lots that offer concrete -only patios — due to the encroachment of these improvements
into the rear -yard setback — such as Lots 1-9. Rev. 2: Comment addressed.
11. [32.5.2(n)] Paving material. Identify the proposed paving material for driveways. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
12. [32.5.2(s)] Labels. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
a. Adjust the Proposed Street Tree label on Lot 4 so that it connects to a street tree.
b. Adjust the 5' Front Setback on Lot 23 so that it connects to the intended linework. This label is currently
pointing to the sidewalk.
c. Adjust the Proposed Sanitary Lateral on Lot 3 so that it connects to the intended linework.
d. Remove the note "Proposed 50' Greenway Area — Dedicated to Albemarle County" from Sheet 4 of this site
plan. This site plan cannot dedicate off -site areas.
13. [Comment] Lighting. Will lighting be provided along the proposed primitive trailway? Rev. 1: Adequate clarification was
provided by the applicant via the comment letter response dated 3/31/2020.
14. [Comment] Notes. On the Cover Sheet, remove Note 44. A subdivision or easement plat will be required for this
development and that/those documents will dictate ownership of proposed easements. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
15. [32.5.2(i)] Off -site easemenis/agreements. Prior to final site plan approval, provide copies of off -site easements or letters of
intent to grant access from off -site property owners to confirm that required elements of this development will be possible.
Off -site easements/agreements will be needed for at least the following:
a. Emergency accessway Rev 1: Comment still applies. Plats addressing the formalization of the Emergency
accessway have been submitted and are currently under review by the County. Once approved and recorded,
the deed book and page references will need to be noted on the site plan prior to final site plan approval.
b. Use of path in Claudius Crozet Park (if this sidewalk will be used in lieu of providing a sidewalk facility on the
south side of Indigo Rd) Rev 1: Comment still applies. This information has not been submitted yet but is still
needed.
c. Off -site stormwater facilities. Rev 1: Comment still applies. A plat addressing this comment has been
submitted and are currently under review by the County. Once approved and recorded, the deed book and page
references will need to be noted on the site plan prior to final site plan approval.
Rev 2: Comment not fully addressed. Easements for the oft site emergency accessway and stormwater facilities have
been submitted and are under review by the County. Once approved and recorded, they will need to be noted on the
site plan prior to final approval. The sidewalk modification request was approved by the Planning Commission on
June 16, 2020. An action letter for that decision will be provided to the applicant when it is available.
Additional comments based on revised plan dated 3/30/20:
16. [32.5.2(a)] On the Cover Sheet, update the notes to reflect the current parcel owner, Daily South Investments, LLC and
related information. Rev. 2: Comment addressed.
17. [Comment] Apologies that this was not realized sooner but, as you are probably aware, USPS now requires centralized
mail delivery for new residential developments (see letter attached). As such, please indicate a location for centralized mail
delivery on the site plan. Rev. 2: Comment addressed.
Additional comments based on revised plan dated 6/02/2020:
18. [Comment] Alignment. There are a number of instances where the proposed site plan and subdivision plat for this
development do not align. The linework on these two documents will need to match before final approval can be
granted. See a few examples below. Please keep in mind that the seamless alignment between these proposals will
help accelerate the approval of both.
SITE PLAN
SUBDIVISION PLAT
\ SPKEC
I2.383AQ
'
AfT� S>q
LO�\
rouor
\
��\
O+
\ \.,.r�,rEa
.Or2 j
5
11'10' W +S F'
� 1
DB 5039 PC 75
z.Bo• .
70
eJ>-E NEW PUBLIC STYlf.
/
e N OT02'J2' E NCE &
ACCESSESS ElSEMENr
i
29.52'
OPEN
O
PROPOSED
SPACE C
17 13,11.+>0
C 0J• 6;
1 I \ Y\
SWM FACIL ITY
U
&I [ l s
' l l RECREAiON`
AREA SS\
--.
-
TENT o
e+.'P\ 5 19-24'E 105.16^\
I
-
\
LOT z6 j
£] / NEW P BUC 10'
STORM
19 EASEWW
LOT 26
1 _
.
LOT
t�
O' PUBLIC
TRAIL IEASEMEM 11it / �\
LOT r \'
OFV_�
t's.LOT isLOTLOT I I
PROPOSEDCCESSLOT io �, A=3.41'
DB._LOT 10
19. [32.5.2(a)] Zoning notes. Include in the zoning notes that sidewalk modification for Indigo Road was approved by
the Planning Commission on June 16, 2020.
20. [Advisory Comment] Labels.
a. On Sheet 3, label the proposed retaining wall (black bold line).
b. On Sheet 4: Utility Plan or Sheet 5: Grading & Drainage Plan, label the proposed stormwater facility
linework (dark grey long dash).
c. On Sheet 5, connect the Proposed 20' Drainage Easement label located on the emergency accessway to
the representative linework.
d. On Sheet 5, connect the Proposed 20' Drainage Easement label located on Lot 23 to the representative
linework. Also include a deed book and page placeholder with this label.
21. [Comment] New easements. General reminder that new easements needed to facilitate this development must be
recorded and noted on the final site plan prior to final site plan approval. It appears many placeholders have
already been included in the plan sets. Staff anticipates this information will be provided once it is known.
OTHER SRC REVIEWERS
Albemarle County Engineering Services (Engineer)
Matthew Wentland, mwentland(an7albemarle.org — Requests Changes, see comments below
1. An approved WPO submittal will be required before site plan approval.
2. An approved road plan submittal will be required before site plan approval.
Albemarle County Information Services (E911)
Brian Becker, bbecker e albemarle.org —No Objection
Albemarle County Building Inspections
Michael Dellinger, mdellingenii�albemarle.org — No Objection
Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue
Shawn Maddox, smaddox"bemarle.org — No Objection
Albemarle County Service Authority
Richard Nelson, melson(a),serviceauthoritv.org — Continue to work with ACSA
Virginia Department of Transportation
Adam Moore, adam.moore(a),vdot.virginia.Qov —No Objection, see letter attached
In accordance with the provisions of Section 32.4.3.5 of Chapter 18 of the Code, if the applicant fails to submit a revised
site plan to address all of the requirements within six (6) months after the date of this letter, the application shall be
deemed to have been voluntarily withdrawn by the applicant.
Please contact Mariah Gleason in the Planning Division by using meleason e albemarle.org or 434-296-5832 ext. 3097 for
further information.
(Z)
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Stephen C. Brich, P.E. 1401 East Broad Street (804) 786-2701
Commissioner Richmond, Virginia 23219 Fax: (804) 786,2940
July 7, 2020
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Attn: Mariah Gleason
Matt Wentland
Re: Foothills Phase V
SDP-2020-00013 — Final Site Plan
Review #2
Dear Ms. Gleason:
The Department of Transportation, Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use
Section, has reviewed the above referenced Site Plan as submitted by Collins Engineering, dated
03-30-2020, and find it to be generally acceptable.
If further information is desired, please contact Max Greene at 434-422-9894.
A VDOT Land Use Permit will be required prior to any work within the right-of-way. The
owner/developer must contact the Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use
Section at (434) 422-9399 for information pertaining to this process.
Sincerely,
Adam J. Moore, P.E.
Area Land Use Engineer
Charlottesville Residency
VirginiaDOT.org
WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING
FOOTHILL CROSSING II
GENERAL
NOTES
OWNER:
ROUTE HOLDINGS, LLC
,n/
H IT E H A L L
DISTRICT
P.O. BOXX 1467
y y
CHARLOTTESWLLE, VA 22902
DEVELOPER:
RIVERBEND DEVELOPMENT, INC.
E;
455 SECOND STREET SSUITE 400
ALBEMARLE
COUNTY
, V
I
R G
I
N
I A
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902
ATTN. ALAN TAYLOR
ENGINEER:
COLLINS ENGINEERING
200 GARRETT ST, SUI7E K
CHARLOTTES14LLE, VA 22902
(434)293-3719
PRE-APPLICA77ON
CONFERENCE. SEPTEMBER 23, 2013
TAX MAP NO.: 05600-00-00-05700 (D.B. 2478, PG. 251)
056A2-01-00-06200 (D.B. 2525, PG. 75)
PROJECT AREA: 14.61 AC (05600-00-00--05700 R-6 PORTION)
2.13 AC (056A2-01-00- 6
16.74 AC.
ZONING: R-6 RESIDENTAL (05600-00-00-05700 - 14.61 AC); ENTRANCE CORRIDOR (EC)
R-2 RESIDENTIAL (056A2-01-00-06200 - 2.13 AC)
DENSITY- R-6 ALLOWABLE DENSITY FOR STANDARD LEVEL CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT.- 6 D.U./AC.
R-2 ALLOWABLE DENSITY FOR BONUS LEVEL CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT- 3 D.U./AC.
PROPOSED DENSITY
R-6 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED: 1
R-6 TOWNHOME/SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED: 19 (TOTAL FU77JRE LOTS)
R-2 TO:e�SLNGLE FAMILY ATTACHED: 3 (FUTURE SUBDIVISIONI)
TOTAL PROPOSED LOTS 23
R-6 DENSITY 20 D.U.114.61 AC. = T..37 D.U./AC.
R-2 DENSITY 3 D.U./2.13 AC. = 1.41 D.U./AC.
OPEN SPACE.
OPEN SPACE A=1.86 ac. OPEN SPACE F=0.05 ac.
OPEN SPACE B=0.05 ac. OPEN SPACE 0=0.03 oc.
OPEN SPACE C=2.85 oc. OPEN SPACE H=0.22 ac.
OPEN SPACE D=0.04 oc. OPEN SPACE 1=0.10 cc.
OPEN SPACE E=0.05 cc.
5.26 AC. / 16.74 AC. = 31.4%
OPEN SPACE TO BE OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNERS ,ASSOCIAT70N.
ALL OPEN SPACE SHALL. BE RESERVED IN A DEED FOR THE COMMON! USE OF LOT
OWNERS IN THE SUBDIVISION.
STEEP SLOPES'
NO PRESERVED STEEP SLOPES ARE LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY. MANAGED STEEP
SLOPES ARE LABELED ON THE EXISTING CONDITIONS SHEET.
OFFS17E DISTURBANCE•
NO OFFSI7E DISTURBANCE IS PROPOSED WITH THIS PLAN.
BUILDING HEIGHTS
MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 35 FEET
SETBACKS.
FRONT.' 5'
SIDE.- 5'
REAR: 20'
SUBDIWSION STREETS:
CURB & GUTTER
WATERSHED:
LICKINGHOLE CREEK WATER SUPPLY WATERSHED
AGRICULTURAL/ FORESTAL
DISTRICT.^ NONE
TOPO & SURVEY
TOPOGRAPHY PROVIDED BY A COMBINATION OF ROUDABUSH, CALE AND ASSOCIATES
AND LOUISA AERIAL SURVEYS INC., JANUARY 20OZ THE BOUNDARY LINE
INFORMATION IS PROVIDED BY ROUDABUSH, GALE, AND ASSOCIATES. INFORMATION
FIELD VERIFIED BY COLLINS ENGINEERING MAY 2014.
DATUM:-
NAD 83
EXIS77NG VEGETATION:
PAR77ALLY WOODED
LIGHTING:
NO LIGHTING IS PROPOSED
PARKING.'
2 OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES SHALL BE PROVIDED ON EACH LOT
PARKING WILL BE PROVDED ON ONE -SIDE OF THE STREET ON FREMONT ST
NEWPORT ST, AND BINION DRIVE.
OFF STREET = 728 (INCLUDES FUTURE TOWNHOME/SF ATTACHED LOTS)
1
'
`
_ -
J.
_-
I
1 ;.. •
-
T -
r
;
-
_...
1
_
L..
11
t\
^i.-
�1 ti
r
ON STREET = 37 PARALLEL ON-S7REET SP
TOTAL = 165 SPACES
GUEST SPACES REQ'D= 7J UNITS/4 GUEST SPACE PER UNIT=18.25 GUEST SPACES
GUEST SPACES PROVIDED=43 PARALLEL PARKING SPACES
PHASING:
NONE
PROFFERS. •
NONE
BUILDING SITES:
FUTURE LOTS 1-64 MAY NOT BE FURTHER DIVIDED. EACH PARCEL CONTAINS A
BUILDING SITE THAT COMPLIES WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ALBEMARLE COUNTY
ZONING ORDINANCE.
BURIAL SITES
NO CEMETERIES WERE FOUND DURING FIELD INVES77GA77ON OF THE SITE:
STREAM BUFFERS
THE STREAM BUFFERS SHOWN HEREON SHALL BE MANAGED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE ALBEMARLE COUNTY WATER PR07EC77ON ORDINANCE
RETAINING WALLS'
NONE
IMPERVIOUS AREAS:
ROADS & SIDEWALK.- 5.70 AC
HOMES.- 2.86 AC
TOTAL• 8.56 AC
v �
r
r 'j ' I t �� rl % I 1 1 \�' .11� ' 1 1 `\ \ `'' 1� , 1, ' (( \ \� . r • -. �.� .-T ^ / // Y �r \
I /
11 �
., \i \\ ,• ` `\ � � � \. _C>,. \ \ ... .. `'_' ��� \ ` .-'�J, �-x
SHEET LAYOUT
SCALE: 1" = 150'
NOTES.'
1) THIS PROPERTY DOES NOT LIE WTHIN AN AGRICULTURAL AND/OR FORESTAL DISTRICT.
2) THIS PROJECT IS NOT LOCATED WTHIN FLOO+PLAIN LIMITS BASED ON FEMA MAP NUMBER 51003CO229D
ADOPTED FEBRUARY 4, 2005.
3) EACH LOT AS SHOWN HEREON CONTAINS A 81:LDING SITE WHICH MEETS 774E REQUIREMENTS OF SEC710M
4.2.2(b)l (18-520)
4) ALL PROPOSED EASEMENTS SHALL BE DEDIICATEI TO PUBLIC USE.
5) STREET TREES SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG; ALL HE PUBLIC STREETS 50' O.C. IN ACCORDANCE WITH VDOT
AND ALBEMARLE COUNTY STANDARDS
ROAD PLAN SHEET LIST
Sheet Number
Sheet Title
1
COVER SHEET
2
EXISTING CONDITIONS
3
LAYOUT PLAN
4
UTILITY PLAN
5
GRADING & MITIGATION PLAN
6
SITE UTILITY DETAILS
7
ROAD NOTES & DETAILS
S
ROAD & WATERLINE PROFILES
9
ROAD & WATERLINE PROFILES
10
ROAD & WATERLINE PROFILES
11
ROAD & WATERLINE PROFILES
12
SIGHT DISTANCE PROFILES
12A
SIGHT DISTANCE PROFILES
12B
ROAD STATIONS PLAN
13
ROAD LINE & CURVE TABLES
14
SANITARY SEWER PROFILES
15
SANITARY SEWER PROFILES
16
DRAINAGE AREA PLAN
17
DRAINAGE PROFILES
16
DRAINAGE PROFILES
19
DRAINAGE PROFILES
20
DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS
21
DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS
22
DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS
23
LANDSCAPING PLAN
24
LANDSCAPING DETAILS
TOTAL
LEGEND
EXIS77NG CUULVERT
CULVERT
Q DROP INLEIT & STRUCTURE NO.
CURB
CURB & GUTTER
PROPOSED PAVEMENT
26 PAGES
APPROVED
by the Albemarle County
Community Development Departrrreal
Date
Fi7--
EARTH DITCH
DRIVEWAY CULVERT
BENCH MARK
— _ — _
CLEARING LIA417S
T
WOT STANDARD STOP SIGN
- - - - - - - - 200 - - - - - - - -
EXISTING CONTOUR
200
PROPOSED CONTOUR
240.55
PROPOSED SPOT ELEVA71ON
78C DEN07ES TOP16ACK OF CURB
T/B DENOTES TOP OF BOX
�1
SCO TAR COLLINS
No. 35791
I
l
l^
I
I
OB
N
n
(N
m
�
TIM
0
r
L w
a In
JOB NO.
112066
SCALE
N/A