Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSP200400036 Legacy Document 2006-01-12 (5)STAFF PERSON: JUDITH WIEGAND PLANNING COMMISSION: JUNE 21, 2005 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: JULY 13, 2005 ZMA 2004-11 CHARLOTTESVILLE POWER EQUIPMENT SP 2004-36 FILL IN THE FLOODPLAIN SP 2004-37 OUTDOOR DISPLAY IN AN ENTRANCE CORRIDOR Request for Critical Slopes Waiver Applicant's Proposal Charlottesville Power Equipment is requesting to rezone 2.142 acres from C-1 (Commercial) to HC (Highway Commercial) to allow a 12,000 square foot, two-story building for equipment sales, offices, and limited repair and storage facilities. Behind the building, a yard area will be used to store equipment waiting to be sold or repaired. A second smaller building will most likely be built after the first building, and its use is undetermined at this time. The use is expected to be either offices, a garden center, or other small, specialized retail. Tax Map 78, Parcel 4B contains 1.871 acres and will be the location of the two buildings and storage yard. Tax Map 78, Parcel 4A1 contains 0.271 acre and is the site of a slope easement essential for development of the main parcel. (See Attachment A) Access to the site will be from Rte 20 via an easement that intersects the driveway entering McDonalds. Originally, the site had access from Free Bridge Lane. However, in prior legislative acts, the County has restricted vehicular access for other properties to that street so that it can become a paved trail within the greenway. Also, the topography of the site would make vehicular access to Free Bridge Lane very difficult and costly. This rezoning request is accompanied by applications for two special use permits to be considered with the rezoning. These special use permit applications are for filling in the floodplain and for outdoor storage and display in an entrance corridor. A request for a critical slopes waiver has also been submitted with the application. The application plan is Attachment B. The first special use permit would allow placement of fill in the floodplain, in accordance with Section 30.3.05.2.2(3). The second special use permit would allow outdoor storage and display in an entrance corridor, in accordance with Section 30.6.3.2(b) of the Zoning Ordinance. The property is located on the northwest corner of the intersection of Rte 20 and 250, behind the McDonald's restaurant. The applicant has submitted proffers (Attachment Q. The first proffer states that the development on the site shall be "general accord" with the application plan, last revised on May 9, 2005, and that the limits of disturbance shown on the approved site plan shall not be significantly different from the limits shown on the application plan. The second proffer limits the number of uses allowed under the proposed rezoning to "machinery and equipment sales, service, and rental" as allowed under the HC District. The third proffer addresses the form, massing, character, and detailing shown in the proposed building elevations, dated December 28, 2004, and indicates that the buildings will be in conformity with those elevations and provides for a process to resolve any conflicts in interpretation between the Architectural Review Board and the Director of Planning. These elevations are included in Attachment D. Petition Request to rezone 2.142 acres from C-1 (Commercial) to HC (Highway Commercial) to allow 12,000 square feet of commercial use in two buildings with proffered plan. The proposal also includes requests for outdoor sales and display and fill in the floodplain (see SP -04-36 and SP - 04 -37). The property, described as Tax Map 78, Parcels 4A1 and 413, is located in the Rivanna Magisterial District on the northwest corner of the intersection of Route 20 and Route 250 East behind McDonald's Restaurant. The Comprehensive Plan designates this property as Regional Service, in Neighborhood Three. Character of the Area The properties subject to the application are located behind the McDonalds restaurant on the northwest corner of the intersection of Routes 20 and 250. Uses surrounding this property include two fast food restaurants, two gas stations, and a muffler repair facility. Free Bridge Lane (Rt. 142 1) borders one side of this property. A greenway that is proposed for the area will incorporate Free Bridge Lane as a paved trail and the area between Free Bridge Lane and the Rivanna River. RECOMMENDATION Staff has reviewed the proposal for conformity with the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance and recommends approval of the Zoning Map Amendment with proffers and special use permits with conditions, if a critical slopes waiver is approved. Planning and Zoning History There have been no changes in the zoning classification of these two parcels since the County's current Zoning Ordinance was adopted in 1980. Planning Commission Input to Date On November 16, 2004, staff presented Charlottesville Power Equipment to the Planning Commission in a worksession. The applicant requested the worksession in response to staff's comments on the first project submittal. In their comments, staff expressed concern about the appropriateness of this use in this location, especially in close proximity to the Rivanna River and proposed greenway. Staff raised several questions for the Commission to consider and to provide guidance to staff 2 1. Is the proposed use appropriate at this location? Does the Planning Commission find that this site should contain a use that is oriented towards the Greenbelt and River? The Planning Commission noted that it was not really so much whether this use is appropriate or not, but it is more about how the buildings are oriented based on the topography. In response to the Planning Commission's concern, the applicant has changed the orientation of the building toward the greenwayt and the river. The applicant has also added landscaped paths and a small resting area with a bench seat to facilitate access from the site to the greenway. 2. Does the Planning Commission believe that the request for "Outdoor Storage and Display" is appropriate at this site, given its location near the Route 250 Entrance Corridor and the Rivanna Greenway? It was the consensus of the Commission that the proposed use would be appropriate at this location, depending on the design. One commissioner stated that the Commission's perspective may be different from the ARB's because their point of view is the Entrance Corridor and the Commission's may be from the river and other places. The applicant has screened the storage lot from both the river/greenway and the entrance corridor. This addresses both the Planning Commission's and the ARB's perspectives. 3. Does the Planning Commission believe that the request for "Fill in the Floodplain" at this site is appropriate to support a development such as the one proposed? It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that the design should be more responsive to the floodplain. The Commission did not have the engineering information to know how much area will be filled, but they indicated that the applicant should be very cautious about filling in the floodplain. One commissioner asked if the Commission felt that the request for fill in the floodplain at this site is appropriate to support the development that is being proposed. The basic question is whether this is the proper use for the infill in the floodplain. The Planning Commission asked staff to look at the new FEMA maps, which will be in effect in February, to determine the fringe and buffer area towards the floodplain. It should be demonstrated that the amount of fill is absolutely minimized, and whatever redesign is done to make the project a more sympathetic fit must take into account that fill in the floodplain should be minimized. Concern was expressed that it appeared the critical slope was caused by the previous development on the McDonald's site. The larger building in this proposal is right in the middle of the critical slopes on the site. The Commission was not opposed to the use, but would like to see a redesign that might be more respectful of the critical slopes than what the current proposal shows. In general consensus, the Planning Commission agreed that utilizing buildings to take up critical slopes is often a very sensible thing to do. The applicant has revised his earlier proposal to be more responsive to the floodplain; the stormwater management facility has been removed from the floodplain and the amount of fill shown is small. The applicant has designed the buildings on the site to take advantage of one area of critical slopes; the front of the building is one story in height and the side facing the river is two stories in height. The other area of critical slopes is being incorporated into the driveway access. Applicant's Justification for the Request The applicant has made the following key points: their plan responds to the requirements of the Neighborhood Model and will enable a good use of a difficult site. The site represents a difficult infill challenge. It is zoned C-1, a district that allows retail, eating establishments, or other service uses by right. However, the applicant's market research indicates that the site's poor visibility (it is situated behind two gas stations, two fast food restaurants, and a muffler repair facility) makes it unlikely to support these uses because they rely on highway traffic from nearby roads. Secondly, the site slopes steeply down to the Rivanna River and floodplain covers a large percentage of the site. This results in a limited amount of developable land. Therefore, the applicant has chosen to proceed with specialized retail or office uses that will be a specific destination for shoppers. Since machinery and equipment sales and service are only allowed in an HC District, the applicant has decided to request rezoning of the property. The applicant has submitted a proffer stipulating that only the "machinery and equipment sales, service and rental" use permitted under the HC district would be applicable to the property, in addition to all C- I uses. Access to the parcel is via an easement adjacent to the driveway into the McDonalds. The restaurant and the proposed equipment sales uses will share the entrance to their respective driveways. By -right Use of the Property With a C-1 zoning classification, the property could be developed with selected retail sales, service and public use establishments. Comprehensive Plan and The Neighborhood Model Chapter 2 of the Comprehensive Plan, entitled "Natural Resources and Cultural Assets," sets goals for preserving those scenic resources that are recognized as essential to the County's character, economic vitality, and quality of life. The Entrance Corridor Overlay Districts were established to meet the Comprehensive Plan objective of maintaining the visual integrity of important roadways. The Architectural Review Board (ARB) addresses the aesthetic impacts of development on those roads by applying the County's design standards for development within Entrance Corridors. The ARB has reviewed the applicant's conceptual site layout and building design for conformity with the County's adopted design guidelines and recommends approval of the conceptual plan with conditions (Attachment E). Requests for a zoning map amendment within the Development Areas are assessed for conformity with the Neighborhood Model (NMD) and the Land Use Plan. The Land Use Plan shows this area as Regional Service: Uses allowed include regional -scale commercial, regional malls, medical centers, mixed-use developments, hotel/motel/conference facilities, professional and corporate offices, interstate interchange developments and uses providing retail, wholesale, business, and/or employment services to Albemarle County and the region. Areas designated as Regional Service typically encompass a large site (+30 acres), arterial road accessibility, water and sewer availability, and compatibility with adjacent land uses. Both vehicular and pedestrian interconnections are expected to nearby residential areas. A mixture of Urban Density Residential uses and community service uses is anticipated within this designation. The Pantops (Neighborhood Three) Development Area profile includes the following recommendations: Construct a greenway along the South Fork of the Rivanna River and the Rivanna River. This provides a pedestrian connection of the Ivy Creek Natural Area to the Urban Area and an opportunity for passive recreation adjacent to the Urban Area. Develop the greenway to meet the recreational and conservation needs of the residents in the Neighborhood, and the entire County. The proposed development includes a pedestrian path linking the site to the proposed greenway. PRINCIPLES OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD MODEL Principle How Principle Is Addressed in This Application Pedestrian The concept plan offers a pedestrian circulation network within the site, Orientation between parking areas and the two buildings. There are also paths connecting the building site with Free Bridge Lane and the proposed greenway. A sidewalk is proposed to connect the site with the existing sidewalk along Route 20. 5 Neighborhood The concept plan shows paths connecting the site with Free Bridge Friendly Streets Lane and, eventually, with the greenway. Landscaping will be provided and Paths around the site to improve views to/from the site and make the paths more attractive. Interconnected This development is so small that the only realistic interconnection is Streets and the paths between the site and Free Bridge Lane/proposed greenway. Transportation Networks Parks and Open Much of the site will be preserved as floodplain. The paths mentioned Space above will be part of this area. Some landscaping is provided. Neighborhood This development is being added to a cluster of existing fast food Centers restaurants, gas stations, and car repair shops. As such, it is filling in a complementary use. Buildings and The two-story building is human scale and the site is designed for Spaces of Human human activity, especially the walking paths. Scale The ARB has reviewed this plan and generally supports it. Relegated The plan provides parking in front of the main building, which screens Parking the parking from Free Bridge Lane and the river. This means that the parking respects the orientation of the building toward the river. The parking in front of the main building is also screened from the Entrance Corridor by the McDonalds. The objective of relegated parking is to screen it from view as much as possible. Because this site is located behind uses that front on Rte. 20 and 250, putting the parking in front of the building is a good response to the objective of relegated parking. Mixture of Uses This is a very small site on which there is the potential for a limited number of uses (commercial, retail, office), so this principle is not met. Mixture of This is a commercial property, so the provision of housing would not Housing Types be anticipated on such a small site. This principle is not met. and Affordability Redevelopment This is a greenfield development, so this principle does not apply. Site Planning that This is a difficult infill site. The amount of floodplain, the existence of Respects Terrain steep slopes, and the difficult access constrain development of this site. Grading will result in some 2:1 slopes that will need to be stabilized with vegetation. The applicant has applied for a critical slopes waiver, noting in his application that some, if not all, of the critical slopes are manmade. Cross section B on the application plan shows that the building has been designed to take advantage of the grade change. The applicant has moved the stormwater management facilities out of the floodplain. The applicant will need to place a small amount of fill in the floodplain to accommodate the access road. This application allows for construction of two buildings, along with sufficient parking for both, as proposed. The applicant has been notified that any change in the proposed use of the second, smaller building may result in insufficient parking. ZMA 2004-11– Rezoning from C-1 to HC (Highway Commercial) STAFF COMMENT Relationship between the application and the purpose and intent of the requested zoning district The site is currently zoned C-1 (Commercial). C-1 districts permit selected retail sales, service and public use establishments. These districts are intended to be established only within the urban area, communities, and villages as set out in the Comprehensive Plan. The by -right uses permitted in C-1 districts are those that require a certain level of visibility from a highway in order to attract sufficient customers. HC (Highway Commercial) districts permit development of commercial establishments, other than shopping centers, primarily oriented to highway locations rather than to central business concentrations (e.g., downtown areas). It is intended that HC districts be established on major highways within the urban area and communities in the comprehensive plan. The by -right uses permitted in HC districts are those that require proximity to a highway for access, but do not necessarily require visibility to attract customers. These businesses are destinations that customers plan to patronize, rather than ones they may select "on impulse" as they drive by. The site does not front directly on either Rte 20 or 250; Tuffy Muffler, Wilco, Wendy's, and McDonalds are all between the site and Rte 20 and 250. Thus, the site has little visibility from either highway. The applicant's market research indicated that the uses permitted under the current C-1 zoning would not be financially feasible due to this lack of visibility. Instead, the applicant is proposing a use—machinery and equipment sales, service and rental—that is more likely to be successful on the site. This use is a highway -oriented destination, the type permitted in HC districts. However, many of the other uses permitted in an HC district would not be appropriate in this location. So, the applicant has requested rezoning to an HC district, but has proffered that the only HC use permitted will be machinery and equipment sales, service and rental, along with all C-1 uses. Public need and justification for the chance Staff believes that rezoning this property from C-1 (Commercial) to HC (Highway Commercial) will make the property more developable. 7 The fill in the floodplain and the use of two retaining walls indicate that the applicant is pushing the limits of what may be built on this site. The proposal shows more respect for the terrain than earlier ones did, but less development on the site might mean less fill in the floodplain. Clear Boundaries This project is well within the Development Area, so this principle does with the Rural not apply. Areas ZMA 2004-11– Rezoning from C-1 to HC (Highway Commercial) STAFF COMMENT Relationship between the application and the purpose and intent of the requested zoning district The site is currently zoned C-1 (Commercial). C-1 districts permit selected retail sales, service and public use establishments. These districts are intended to be established only within the urban area, communities, and villages as set out in the Comprehensive Plan. The by -right uses permitted in C-1 districts are those that require a certain level of visibility from a highway in order to attract sufficient customers. HC (Highway Commercial) districts permit development of commercial establishments, other than shopping centers, primarily oriented to highway locations rather than to central business concentrations (e.g., downtown areas). It is intended that HC districts be established on major highways within the urban area and communities in the comprehensive plan. The by -right uses permitted in HC districts are those that require proximity to a highway for access, but do not necessarily require visibility to attract customers. These businesses are destinations that customers plan to patronize, rather than ones they may select "on impulse" as they drive by. The site does not front directly on either Rte 20 or 250; Tuffy Muffler, Wilco, Wendy's, and McDonalds are all between the site and Rte 20 and 250. Thus, the site has little visibility from either highway. The applicant's market research indicated that the uses permitted under the current C-1 zoning would not be financially feasible due to this lack of visibility. Instead, the applicant is proposing a use—machinery and equipment sales, service and rental—that is more likely to be successful on the site. This use is a highway -oriented destination, the type permitted in HC districts. However, many of the other uses permitted in an HC district would not be appropriate in this location. So, the applicant has requested rezoning to an HC district, but has proffered that the only HC use permitted will be machinery and equipment sales, service and rental, along with all C-1 uses. Public need and justification for the chance Staff believes that rezoning this property from C-1 (Commercial) to HC (Highway Commercial) will make the property more developable. 7 Anticipated impact on public facilities and services The proposed rezoning will have an increased impact on stormwater management because the property will be developed. Under the current zoning, it is unlikely the property would be developed due to the lack of visibility from the nearby highways. Stormwater management will conform to County ordinances. No adverse impacts are expected on streets, water, and sewer. Anticipated impact on natural, cultural, and historic resources No impact is anticipated on cultural or historical resources of the County. The pedestrian path tie-in to the proposed greenway will be a benefit for the County. Eliminating the access to Free Bridge Lane will simplify the greenway planning process. SUMMARY Staff has identified the following factors that are favorable to the rezoning request: 1. The rezoning will enable development of a difficult infill site, which might not otherwise be developed. 2. The applicant has offered a plan for development that incorporates several of the principles of the Neighborhood Model. 3. The site will feature a pedestrian connection to the adjacent greenway. 4. The applicant has agreed not to access the site from Free Bridge Lane; instead access will be provided via an easement on the adjacent McDonalds site. The applicant's decision to provide alternative access supports the County's intention to convert Free Bridge Lane to a paved pedestrian path within the proposed greenway. Staff has identified no factors that are unfavorable to this request. RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends approval of the rezoning with the attached proffers. SP 2005-36 FILL IN THE FLOODPLAIN Applicant's Proposal The applicant proposes to place a small amount of fill in the floodplain, outside of the stream buffer, to accommodate grading necessary for the buildings and parking areas. Placing the fill will create some 2:1 slopes and require retaining walls in two locations. N. Petition Request for a special use permit to allow fill in the floodplain in accordance with Section 30.3.05.2.2(3) of the Zoning Ordinance which allows for filling of land. See concurrent requests, ZMA-04-11 and SP -04-37. The property, described as Tax Map 78, Parcels 4A1 and 413, is located in the Rivanna Magisterial District on the northwest corner of the intersection of Route 20 and Route 250 East behind McDonald's Restaurant. The Comprehensive Plan designates this property as Regional Service, in Neighborhood Three. STAFF COMMENT Staff has reviewed the request for a special use permit for fill in the floodplain. From the information on the concept plan and in the application, the property is in an area of detailed study on FIRM 287, and as such will require the use of the FEMA model or its equivalent. The fill in the floodplain and on slopes off the travelway are small in comparison to the width of the floodplain and the river in this area. Therefore, staff does not believe that the fill will have a significant impact on the flood -carrying capacity of the river. However, because this is a detailed study area for FEMA that was recently updated, staff would like to keep the study area maps up- to-date. Requiring the applicant to obtain a letter of map revision also keeps FEMA informed in case they should have a concern with the fill. RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends approval of SP -2004-36, subject to the following conditions: 1. A letter of map amendment must be obtained from FEMA. 2. Copies of state and federal permits (DEQ, Army Corps of Engineers) must be provided. SP 2004-37 OUTDOOR STORAGE AND DISPLAY IN AN ENTRANCE CORRIDOR Applicant's Proposal The applicant proposes to store and display equipment outside the building in the locations indicated on the plan shown in Appendix F. Some of the for -sale equipment will be displayed outside the building or under the tower, and some of the equipment waiting for repair will be stored outside in the lot at the rear of the building. Petition Request for a special use permit to allow outdoor sales and display associated with permitted uses, which would be visible from an Entrance Corridor Street in accordance with Section 30.6.3.2(b) of the Zoning Ordinance. See concurrent requests, ZMA-04-11 and SP -04-36. The property, described as Tax Map 78, Parcels 4A1 and 413, is located in the Rivanna Magisterial District on the northwest corner of the intersection of Route 20 and Route 250 East behind 0 McDonald's Restaurant. The Comprehensive Plan designates this property as Regional Service, in Neighborhood Three. RECOMMENDATION Staff has reviewed this request for compliance with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance Sections 31.2.4.1 and 30.6.3.2.b, and recommends approval of SP 2004- 37, with conditions. Architectural Review Board (ARB) The ARB reviewed this proposal at its meeting on February 22, 2005. The ARB had no objection to the request for the rezoning. The ARB has no objection to the request for the Special Use Permit, with conditions. The ARB's comments are in Attachment E. STAFF COMMENT Staff will address each provision of Section 31.2.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance. The Board of Supervisors hereby reserves unto itself the right to issue all special use permits permitted hereunder. Special use permits for uses as provided in this ordinance may be issued upon a finding by the Board of Supervisors that such use will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property, It is anticipated that the storage and display of lawn care and similar equipment will not have a negative impact on the surrounding uses or on the site itself. The conditions proposed by the ARB will prevent the equipment from being visible to drivers and pedestrians in the Entrance Corridor. that the character of the district will not be changed thereby It is anticipated that the proposed use will not change the character of the EC district for the following reasons: The site is surrounded by other commercial uses. The display area is limited in size and will be screened by the building. Recommended additional landscaping will help limit visibility of the display from the road. The potential impact of the use on the character of the district has been addressed by the ARB. The ARB has recommended conditions of approval. and that such use will be in harmony with the purpose and intent of this ordinance, Staff has reviewed this request for compliance with the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance, as stated in Section 1.4, and identified no conflict that would arise as a result of its approval. 10 with the uses permitted by right in the district, The proposed display use will not have an impact on permitted uses in the EC District. with additional regulations provided in Section 5.0 of this ordinance, There are no additional regulations in Section 5.0 specifically addressing the display of equipment. and with the public health, safety and general welfare. No adverse impacts on the public health, safety, and/or welfare are anticipated. RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends approval of SP 2004-37, subject to the following conditions: 1. Site lighting shall be limited, to the satisfaction of the ARB. 2. The storage yard fence shall be of material, character, and design that are coordinated with the building, to the satisfaction of the ARB. 3. Regarding items for storage/display: a. Equipment shall be stored/displayed only in areas indicated for storage/display on the "Display Area Exhibit" plan dated June 14, 2005. b. Items located in the storage lot on the north side of the building shall not exceed 10 feet in height. The height may be varied depending on other corresponding site and/or grading changes, as determined by the ARB. c. Items located in the display areas under the two easternmost awnings on the south side of the building shall be limited to small lawn mowers, rototillers, and other similarly sized items. Items shall not extend into sidewalk, landscape, or parking areas. d. Items located under the tower shall be fully contained within the structure of the roofed tower, as shown on the architectural elevation drawing sheet A3 (East/front Elevation) and A5 (South Elevation), dated May 9, 2005. e. Equipment shall not be elevated anywhere on the site. 4. Additional landscaping beyond that shown on the Conceptual Landscape Plan with revision date of May 9, 2005, is required. Landscaping, including but not limited to, evergreen plants on the north side of the entrance road to further limit visibility of the storage lot, shall be provided to the satisfaction of the ARB. An agreement regarding the location, placement, and maintenance of this additional landscaping must be signed by the property owner and approved by the ARB prior to the approval of any site plan. Request for Critical Slopes Waiver The applicant has requested a Critical Slopes Waiver. Staff has reviewed the request for a Critical Slopes Waiver. The engineering analysis of the request follows: 11 Description of critical slope area and proposed disturbance The areas of critical slope are along the natural hillside between McDonald's and Free Bridge Lane, and in a former stockpile area behind the Wilco site. There is also a disturbance of man- made critical slopes along the entrance, which is off-site, on the embankment created by the McDonalds adjacent to Route 20, above their existing stormwater basin. After temporary disturbance for erosion control measures, it is expected that most of the critical slopes on the site will be disturbed. Areas Acres Total site 2.139 (tm.78-413 & 78-4A1) Critical slopes 0.46 22% of site Critical slopes disturbed 0.39 85% of critical slopes * the area of off-site critical slope disturbance for the entrance is an additional 0.10 acres. Exemptions to critical slopes waivers for driveways, roads and utilities without reasonable alternative locations The off-site disturbance and a small corner of the on-site disturbance are necessary to create the entrance and travelway to the site. Compliance with Zoning Ordinance 18-4.2 Staff will address each provision of Section 4.2 of the Zoning Ordinance. These provisions are created to implement the comprehensive Dlan by Drotectinc and conservin steep hillsides together with public drinking water suflplies and floodplain areas and in recognition of increased potential for soil erosion, sedimentation, water pollution and septic disposal problems associated with the development of those areas described in the comprehensive plan as critical slopes. It is hereby recognized that such development of critical slopes may result in: rapid and/or large-scale movement of soil and rock; Proper slope and wall construction, control of drainage, and vegetative stabilization will prevent any movement of soil. excessive storrawater runoff Stormwater runoff will be increased by impervious areas and steeper slopes being placed on the site. A waiver has been requested for detention, and will likely be granted with the site plan review according to 17-314176, provided adequate channels are satisfactorily addressed through off-site improvements. It has been recommended with the rezoning that some benefit could be provided by improving the existing basin for the McDonald's site, but so far the applicant has declined to pursue this. siltation of natural and man-made bodies of water; Inspection and bonding by the County will ensure siltation control on-site during 12 construction. Proper stabilization and maintenance will ensure long term stability, on-site. The off-site disturbance will likely cause siltation in the McDonalds basin, which lies directly below the disturbance and a proposed retaining wall. loss of aesthetic resource; This area is visible from the greenway trail and Free Bridge Lane, and has a limited view from Route 20. It has been recently cleared of small trees and brush in some areas. There is trash and debris on the site. The Comprehensive Plan Greenway Plan Trail Locations Map shows this greenway trail as a "Class A" trail. Class A trails are to be eight feet wide, either paved or compacted crushed stone, and ADA and bicycle accessible. Thus, this section of the greenway is expected to receive significant use. and in the event of septic system failure, a greater travel distance of septic effluent, all of which constitute potential dangers to the public health, safety and/or welfare. This is not a concern, as the site will be serviced by public sewer. Based on the review above, it is recommended that the applicant work out an arrangement with the McDonald's site to refurbish the existing basin after its expected siltation during construction. RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends that the request for a critical slopes waiver be granted. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A — Location Map Attachment B — Application Plan (4 sheets) Attachment C — Proffers Attachment D — Proposed Building Elevations Attachment E — ARB Letter Attachment F — Display Areas Map 13