Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB202000073 Staff Report 2020-08-06ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT Project #/Name ARB-2020-73: 2415 Ivy Road Final Site Plan Review Review Type Final Site Development Plan Review Parcel Identification 060000000025A0 Location 2415 Ivy Road near the intersection of Canterbury Road (Figure 1) Zoned Commercial (C1)/Entrance Corridor (EC)/Airport Impact Area (AIA)/Steep Slopes - Managed Owner/Applicant JPA Tower Investors, LLC/Clark Gathright Magisterial District Samuel Miller Proposal To renovate 10,000 sf of the street -facing end of the existing commercial building for retail use. Context 2415 Ivy Road is part of a small group of buildings (including 2405, 2409 and 2411) originally constructed as a John Deere dealership. This portion of Ivy Road is a mixture of commercial and residential uses. A golf course is to the southwest. The commercial buildings in the vicinity are one and two stories tall. Visibility The south, east and west sides of the building are clearly visible from the EC (Ivy Road). The building is 68' from the right-of-way and 82' from the curb. ARB Meeting Date August 3, 2020 Staff Contact Khris Taggart Figure 1: Google image (left) showing property along the Entrance Corridor and County GIS map (right) highlighting subject property PROJECT HISTORY The existing buildings on the site were built in 1950, prior to the creation of the Entrance Corridor (EC) overlay district, as a John Deere dealership. The ARB has reviewed a number of sign applications for this property since 1990 and approved the initial site plan and provided comments on the building permit plan on January 21, 2020 and May 11, 2020, respectively. REF GUIDELINE ACTIONS 1/21/20 & 5/11/2020 ISSUE 8/3/2020 RECOMMENDATION 8/3/2020 Structure design 1 The goal of the regulation of the design of development within the designated Provide color samples for the metal canopy and The color to be used for the metal canopy and parapet cap has been None. Entrance Corridors is to ensure that new development within the corridors reflects the metal parapet cap. identified as dark bronze, which is coordinated with the other building the traditional architecture of the area. Therefore, it is the purpose of ARB review colors and is expected to have an appropriate appearance. and of these Guidelines, that proposed development within the designated Entrance Revise the wall section to clearly delineate the Corridors reflect elements of design characteristic of the significant historical material utilized in each portion of the wall. The wall sections have been revised to clearly delineate the material landmarks, buildings, and structures of the Charlottesville and Albemarle area, and used in each portion of the wall. to promote orderly and attractive development within these corridors. Applicants Revise the design to reflect the original materials should note that replication of historic structures is neither required nor desired. and industrial character of the building. The design has been revised to better reflect the industrial character of the building. The red brick veneer of the existing building will now remain unpainted. The new pilasters for the storefront will be constructed of brick veneer to match existing. The fabric awnings of the previous design have been revised to steel canopies for consistency 2 Visitors to the significant historical sites in the Charlottesville and Albemarle area experience these sites as ensembles of buildings, land, and vegetation. In order to accomplish the integration of buildings, land, and vegetation characteristic of these across the fagade (Fig. 2 and 3). The applicant notes that the new canopy sites, the Guidelines require attention to four primary factors: compatibility with is similar to the original canopy on the adjacent building (Fig 4). New significant historic sites in the area; the character of the Entrance Corridor; site glass garage -style doors are proposed for the side elevations (Fig. 5 and development and layout; and landscaping. 6). 3 New structures and substantial additions to existing structures should respect the traditions of the architecture of historically significant buildings in the The revised design adds a painted wall screen above the canopy on the Charlottesville and Albemarle area. Photographs of historic buildings in the area, as front elevation. The screen turns the comer and extends a short distance well as drawings of architectural features, which provide important examples of this on both side elevations. The light tan color proposed for the wood screen tradition are contained in Appendix A. provides a link to other lighter -colored buildings in the immediate vicinity, and it is coordinated with the proposed rooftop equipment 4 The examples contained in Appendix A should be used as a guide for building design: the standard of compatibility with the area's historic structures is not screens. On the east elevation, the wood screen is also added around the intended to impose a rigid design solution for new development. Replication of the existing window in the bay closest to the street (Fig. 5). design of the important historic sites in the area is neither intended nor desired. The Guideline's standard of compatibility can be met through building scale, materials, The design of the west elevation has been revised to replace the existing and forms which may be embodied in architecture which is contemporary as well as clerestory windows with modem clerestory windows using the same traditional. The Guidelines allow individuality in design to accommodate varying dark bronze storefront system used on the fagade (Fig. 6). The material tastes as well asspecial functional requirements. and color proposed is in character with the industrial nature of the building. 5 It is also an important objective of the Guidelines to establish a pattern of compatible architectural characteristics throughout the Entrance Corridor in order to achieve unity and coherence. Building designs should demonstrate sensitivity to other nearby structures within the Entrance Corridor. Where a designated corridor is substantially developed, these Guidelines require striking a careful balance between harmonizing new development with the existing character of the corridor and achieving compatibility with the significant historic sites in the area. 9 Building forms and features, including roofs, windows, doors, materials, colors and textures should be compatible with the forms and features of the significant historic buildings in the area, exemplified by (but not limited to) the buildings described in Appendix A [of the design guidelines]. The standard of compatibility can be met through scale, materials, and forms which may be embodied in architecture which is contemporary as well as traditional. The replication of important historic sites in Albemarle County is not the objective of these guidelines. 1 I The overall design of buildings should have human scale. Scale should be integral to the building and site design. 13 Any appearance of "blankness" resulting from building design should be relieved using design detail or vegetation, or both. 14 Arcades, colonnades, or other architectural connecting devices should be used to unify groups of buildings within a development. 15 Trademark buildings and related features should be modified to meet the requirements of the Guidelines. 16 Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should not be highly tinted or highly reflective. Revise the plan to include the standard window The plan has been revised to include a note regarding the VLT and the Revise the window glass Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should meet the follawing criteria: Visible glass note and ensure that the proposed windows VLR. However, as written, the note could be interpreted to mean that the note to clarify that the light transmittance (VLT) shall not drop below 40%. Visible light reflectance (VLR) meet this requirement. glass is to have a dark bronze tint. Also, the glass for the garage style window glass will be shall not exceed 30%. Specifications on the proposed window glass should be doors is noted as satin etched glass, which is not entirely transparent. clear, un-tinted. submitted with the application for final review. Consider clear glass for the garage doors. Accessory structures and equipment 17 Accessory structures and equipment should be integrated into the overall plan of Revise the mechanical equipment exhibits to be The mechanical equipment exhibits have been revised to scale, some Revise the screening development and shall, to the extent possible, be compatible with the building to scale, utilize all of the same measurements, equipment locations have been provided, views from the east and west device to a length that designs used on the site. show the anticipated maximum height of the along the EC are included, the mechanical equipment visibility note has accommodates all 18 The following should be located to eliminate visibility from the Entrance Corridor HVAC units, have the line of sight from the been provided, and an additional note states that any additional proposed mechanical street. If, after appropriate siting, these features will still have a negative visual impact farthest edge of the right-of-way, and provide equipment will be screened. However, the anticipated maximum heights equipment. Revise the on the Entrance Corridor street, screening should be provided to eliminate visibility. views from the west and east along the EC. of the new HVAC units have not been identified. So, it is unclear rooftop equipment screen a. Loading areas, b. Service areas, c. Refuse areas, d. Storage areas, e. Mechanical whether or not the 5' screen will completely hide the mechanical lengths and locations to equipment, f. Above -ground utilities, and g. Chain link fence, barbed wire, razor Ensure that the reduced depth of the new parapet equipment. Also, the applicant has noted that additional/alternate support the building wire, and similar security fencing devices. extension on the east side of the building will completely screen the proposed HVAC units equipment locations may be necessary, though the wood screen will be provided for all units. The current elevations show two rooftop screens design while screening all possible equipment 19 Screening devices should be compatible with the design of the buildings and surrounding natural vegetation and may consist of. a. Walls, b. Plantings, and c. from the EC. whose locations and lengths show no particular relationship to building locations. Fencing. Include in the plan whether the existing rooftop form or divisions. It may be possible to establish roof screen lengths and locations that support the building design while screening all possible Clarify/show the 21 The following note should be added to the site plan and the architectural plan: "Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be mechanical unit near the south end of the equipment locations. locations of the proposed eliminated." building will remain. If it is to remain, revise the gas meter and water Roof Plan and Line of Sight of Mechanical A note has been provided stating that the existing rooftop mechanical utility box, and ensure Equipment exhibit to show the unit and ensure unit is to be removed. that they are not visible that it will no longer be visible from the EC. from the EC. The dumpster location has been moved to the rear property line near the Provide the mechanical equipment visibility northeast corner of the building. The dumpster is to be enclosed by a note. board on board fence with landscaping surrounding it (Burkwood Vibumum (7) and Nellie R Stevens Holly (2)). The visibility of this Confirm that the dumpster location is workable. dumpster is appropriately screened. If it will be visible from the EC include details for the dumpster enclosure in the site plan and An area reserved for mechanical equipment is shown along the north identify screen type, material, manufacture, and elevation of the building; however, it is unclear if this area is for color. additional mechanical equipment or the proposed location for the gas meter and water utility box. Show the locations of the proposed gas meter and water utility box, and ensure that they are not visible from the EC. 20 Surface runoff structures and detention ponds should be designed to fit into the natural None. This is an existing development. Very little of the natural drainage None. topography to avoid the need for screening. When visible from the Entrance Corridor pattern remains. The impacts to drainage are limited to the southwest street, these features must be frilly integrated into the landscape. They should not have comer of the site, and along the west side of the building, where the appearance of engineered features. accessways are proposed. No detention ponds are proposed and only one new surface runoff structure is shown at the front of the building in the 44 Natural drainage patterns (or to the extent required, new drainage patterns) should be incorporated into the finished site to the extent possible. proposed parking area. Negative visual impacts are not expected. Lighting 22 Light should be contained on the site and not spill over onto adjacent properties or Revise the Canopy Photometric Plan sheets to The lighting plan has been revised to show property lines. No light Revise the lighting plan streets; show the right-of-way line. Ensure that spillover exceeds 0.5 fc at the property lines. to specify fixtures with a from the luminaires does not exceed 0.5 warns white light. footcandles at the road right-of-way. The highest illumination value is 15.7 fc, which is well below the EC standard of 20 fc. Revise the lighting plan 23 Light should be shielded, recessed or flush -mounted to eliminate glare. All fixtures with lamps emitting 3000 lumens or more must be full cutoff fixtures. Revise the photometric plan to consider any shielding by the face of the canopy. The lighting proposed under the canopy has been revised to fixtures that to specify the color of the wall mounted fixtures 24 Light levels exceeding 30 footcandles are not appropriate for display lots in the Entrance Corridors. Lower light levels will apply to most other uses in the Entrance have significantly lower illumination values than those previously under the canopy and the Corridors. See recommendation 9 above. proposed. gooseneck sign fixtures. 25 Light should have the appearance of white light with a warn soft glow, however, a consistent appearance throughout a site or development is required. Consequently, if Revise the Canopy Photometric Plan using a The lighting plan does not specify the color temperature of the lighting Revise the site plan to existing lamps that emit non -white light are to remain, new lamps may be required to Light Loss Factor of 1.0 and note this on the proposed. include manufacturer's match them. plan. specifications for all 26 Dark brown, dark bronze, or black are appropriate colors for free-standing pole The proposal indicates that the color of the proposed free-standing pole proposed fixtures. Show mounted light fixtures in the Entrance Corridors. Revise the Canopy Photometric Plan to specify a warm white light, which would be between 2,700 mounted fixtures is to be dark bronze. However, the color of the wall- mounted fixtures under the canopy and the gooseneck sign fixtures has that fixtures that emit 3,000 lumens or more are 27 The height and scale of freestanding, pole -mounted light fixtures should be compatible with the height and scale of the buildings and the sites they are to 3,000K. not been identified. full cutoff styles. illuminating, and with the use of the site. Typically, the height of freestanding pole - mounted light fixtures in the Entrance Corridors should not exceed 20 feet, including Revise the Canopy Photometric Plan to include The lighting plan has been revised to use a Light Loss Factor of 1.0 and the base. Fixtures that exceed 20 feet in height will typically require additional the standard lighting note. it has been noted on the plan. screening to achieve an appropriate appearance from the Entrance Corridor. The standard lighting note has been provided. 28 In determining the appropriateness of lighting fixtures for the Entrance Corridors, the individual context of the site will be taken into consideration on a case by case basis. The gooseneck sign fixtures are not full cutoff. To meet ordinance 29 The following note should be included on the lighting plan: "Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp that emits 3,000 or more initial lumens shall be a full cutoff requirements, fixtures that are not full cutoff must emit less than 3,000 luminaire and shall be arranged or shielded to reflect light away from adjoining lumens. residential districts and away from adjacent roads. The spillover of lighting from luminaires onto public roads and property in residential or Waal areas zoning districts shall not exceed one half footcandle." 30- Guidelines for the Use of Decorative Landscape Lighting None. No decorative lighting has been proposed. None. 31 Landscaping 7 The requirements of the Guidelines regarding landscaping are intended to reflect the Revise the plan to provide the required The landscape plan has been revised to show the required ornamental Revise the plan to show landscaping characteristic of many of the area's significant historic sites which is ornamental trees. trees. utility easements and characterized by large shade trees and lawns. Landscaping should promote visual ensure that there are no order within the Entrance Corridor and help to integrate buildings into the existing Revise the plan to show utility easements and The easement widths are still not shown on the site plan so conflict conflicts between the environment of the corridor. ensure that there are no conflicts between the between utilities and the landscaping cannot be fully accessed. utilities and the proposed utilities and the proposed landscaping. landscaping. Revise the large street trees to a species with a The large street trees originally proposed as Willow Oaks have been revised to Allee Elm which have a narrower spread that will minimize 8 Continuity within the Entrance Corridor should be obtained by planting different types of plant materials that share similar characteristics. Such common elements narrower spread to minimize utility conflicts. potential utility conflicts. Revise the plans to allow for more flexibility in the design of structures because common landscape (See comment #35) provide consistent features will help to harmonize the appearance of development as seen from the The 3' high decorative stone wall originally proposed appears to have reference to the stone street upon which the Corridor is centered. been removed from the proposal in favor of screening shrubs. However, notes remain on the Cover Sheet and the Grading and Drainage Plan that wall. Consider revising the proposal to include 32 Landscaping along the frontage of Entrance Corridor streets should include the following: mention a proposed stone wall adjacent to Ivy Rd. the stone wall along the a. Large shade trees should be planted parallel to the Entrance Corridor Street. Such frontage. Provide a wall trees should be at least 3'/z inches caliper (measured 6 inches above the ground) and Along this portion of this Entrance Corridor, low stone walls are typical. detail and a material should be of a plant species common to the area. Such trees should be located at least Thus, the decorative stone wall originally proposed would help to further sample if the wall is every 35 feet on center. integrate this development into the existing streetscape. proposed. b. Flowering ornamental trees of a species common to the area should be interspersed among the trees required by the preceding paragraph. The ornamental trees need not alternate one for one with the large shade trees. They may be planted among the large shade trees in a less regular spacing pattern. c. In situations where appropriate, a three or four board fence or low stone wall, typical of the area, should align the frontage of the Entrance Corridor street. d. An area of sufficient width to accommodate the foregoing plantings and fencing should be reserved parallel to the Entrance Corridor street, and exclusive of road right-of-way and utility easements. 33 Landscaping along interior roads: Provide two additional large shade trees, 2%:" The two additional large shade trees have not been provided. A potential Provide two additional a. Large trees should be planted parallel to all interior roads. Such trees should be at caliper at planting, spaced 40 feet on center, future travelway is shown on the site plan; however, there appears to be large shade trees, 2%" least 2% inches caliper measured six inches above theground) and should be of a along the west side of the accesswa . sufficient planting area to accommodate the two trees. caliper at planting, spaced plant species common to the area. Such trees should be located at least every 40 feet 40 feet on center, along on center. the west side of the accessway. 34 Landscaping along interior pedestrian ways: (See comment #35) A combination of American Sweet Gum, Nellie Stevens Holly, Little Revise the landscape a. Medium trees should be planted parallel to all interior pedestrian ways. Such trees Gem Magnolia, and Yoshino Cherry trees are proposed along the schedule to indicate the should be at least 2% inches caliper (measured six inches above the ground) and sidewalk adjacent to the south and west sides of the building. This caliper at planting for the should be of a species common to the area. Such trees should be located at least landscaping is appropriate and helps to break up the length of the cherry trees. every 25 feet on center. building when viewed from the corridor. The plant schedule provides plant height instead of caliper for the cherry trees. 36 Landscaping of buildings and other structures: a. Trees or other vegetation should be planted along the front of long buildings as necessary to soften the appearance of exterior walls. The spacing, size, and type of such trees or vegetation should be determined by the length, height, and blankness of such walls. b. Shrubs should be used to integrate the site, buildings, and other structures; dumpsters, accessory buildings and structures; "drive thru" windows; service areas; and signs. Shrubs should measure at least 24 inches in height. 35 Landscaping of parking areas: Provide the standard perimeter and interior Perimeter parking trees have been provided. However, the spacing Revise the landscape plan a. Large trees should align the perimeter of parking areas, located 40 feet on center. parking lot landscaping in all parking areas exceeds 40' on center along the western perimeter. to reduce the spacing of Trees should be planted in the interior of parking areas at the rate of one tree for where improvements (other than paint striping) the western perimeter every 10 parking spaces provided and should be evenly distributed throughout the are proposed. parking trees to 40' on interior of the parking area. See comment #7. center. b. Trees required by the preceding paragraph should measure 2% inches caliper Provide a wall detail and a material sample for (measured six inches above the ground); should be evenly spaced; and should be of a the stone wall proposed between the EC and the species common to the area. Such trees should be planted in planters or medians front parking area. Matching the character of sufficiently large to maintain the health of the tree and shall be protected by curbing. other retaining walls in the area would be c. Shrubs should be provided as necessary to minimize the parking area's impact on appropriate. Entrance Corridor streets. Shrubs should measure 24 inches in height. Remove the decorative stone wall from the Existing Conditions & Demolition Plan. 37 Plant species: a. Plant species required should be as approved by the Staff based None. The proposed plant species are appropriate. None. upon but not limited to the Generic Landscape Plan Recommended Species List and Native Plants or Virginia Landscapes (Appendix D . 38 Plant health: The following note should be added to the landscape plan: "All site None. The note is provided on the site plan. None. plantings of trees and shrubs shall be allowed to reach, and be maintained at, mature height; the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall be pruned minimally and only to support the overall health of theplant." Development pattern and site grading 6 Site development should be sensitive to the existing natural landscape and should None. This is an existing development and very little natural landscape remains None. contribute to the creation of an organized development plan. This may be on the site. With the exception of the managed steep slopes on the west accomplished, to the extent practical, by preserving the trees and rolling terrain side of the parcel, which will not be impacted by the proposed layout, typical of the area; planting new trees along streets and pedestrian ways and the site is very flat. choosing species that reflect native forest elements; insuring that any grading will blend into the surrounding topography thereby creating a continuous landscape; There are three large existing deciduous trees between the EC and the preserving, to the extent practical, existing significant river and stream valleys which building, one of which is to remain. There are also existing evergreen may be located on the site and integrating these features into the design of trees and shrubs along the front of the building (Figure 2). surrounding development; and limiting the building mass and height to a scale that does not overpower the natural settings of the site, or the Entrance Corridor. The existing building is parallel to Ivy Road. 39 The relationship of buildings and other structures to the Entrance Corridor street and to other development within the corridor should be as follows: A potential vehicle connection is proposed to the west. a. An organized pattern of roads, service lanes, bike paths, and pedestrian walks should guide the layout of the site. There is an existing paved walkway along Ivy Road that will remain. b. In general, buildings fronting the Entrance Corridor street should be parallel to the street. Building groupings should be arranged to parallel the Entrance Corridor street. No retaining walls are proposed. c. Provisions should be made for connections to adjacent pedestrian and vehicular circulation systems. d. Open spaces should be tied into surrounding areas to provide continuity within the Entrance Corridor. e. If significant natural features exist on the site (including creek valleys, steep slopes, significant trees or rock outcroppings), to the extent practical, then such natural features should be reflected in the site layout. If the provisions of Section 32.5.6.n of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance apply, then improvements required by that section should be located so as to maximize the use of existing features in screening such improvements from Entrance Corridor streets. f. The placement of structures on the site should respect existing views and vistas on and around the site. 40 Site grading should maintain the basic relationship of the site to surrounding conditions by limiting the use of retaining walls and by shaping the terrain through the use of smooth, rounded landforms that blend with the existing terrain. Steep cut or fill sections are generally unacceptable. Proposed contours on the grading plan shall be rounded with a ten -foot minimum radius where they meet the adjacent condition. Final grading should achieve a natural, rather than engineered, appearance. Retaining walls 6 feet in height and taller, when necessary, shall be terraced and planted to blend with the landscape. 41 No grading, trenching, or tunneling should occur within the drip line of any trees or Show tree protection fencing for preserved trees Tree protection fencing for preserved trees is shown on both the grading None. other existing features designated for preservation in the final Certificate of in both the grading and landscape plans. and landscape plans. Appropriateness. Adequate tree protection fencing should be shown on, and coordinated throughout, the grading, landscaping and erosion and sediment control plans. Provide a conservation checklist in the site plan. A conservation checklist has been provided in the site plan. 42 Areas designated for preservation in the final Certificate of Appropriateness should be clearly delineated and protected on the site prior to any grading activity on the Ensure that no grading is proposed within the Existing trees previously shown to remain along the west side of the site. This protection should remain in place until completion of the development of dripline of any tree designated as preserved. building are now proposed to be removed. the site. 43 Preservation areas should be protected from storage or movement of heavy equipment within this area. Signs Submit a comprehensive sign plan for review A Comprehensive Sign Plan has not been submitted but what has been A comprehensive sign with the next site/architectural submittal. Note illustrated in the architectural drawings could possibly meet the EC plan is required for multi - that ARB approval of a comprehensive sign plan Guidelines. tenant buildings. is required for multi -tenant buildings with the Approval of a final site plan. comprehensive sign plan is required prior to final ARB approval of this application. Revise the site plan to include manufacturer's specifications for the gooseneck fixtures. Show that they emit less than 3,000 lumens or revise them to fixtures that are full cutoff. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends the following as the primary points of discussion: 1. Proposed architectural design, materials and colors. 2. Visibility of proposed and existing rooftop mechanical equipment. 3. Proposed landscaping and stone wall along frontage. Staff recommends approval with the following revisions: 1. Revise the window glass note to clarify that the window glass will be clear, un-tinted. 2. Consider clear glass for the garage doors. 3. Revise the screening device to a length that accommodates all proposed mechanical equipment. Revise the rooftop equipment screen lengths and locations to support the building design while screening all possible equipment locations. 4. Show the locations of the proposed gas meter and water utility box, and ensure that they are not visible from the EC. 5. Revise the lighting plan to specify fixtures with a warn white light. 6. Revise the lighting plan to specify the color of the wall mounted fixtures under the canopy and the gooseneck sign fixtures. 7. Revise the site plan to include manufacturer's specifications for all proposed fixtures. Show that fixtures that emit 3,000 lumens or more are full cutoff styles. 8. Revise the plan to show utility easements and ensure that there are no conflicts between the utilities and the proposed landscaping. 9. Revise the plans to provide consistent reference to the stone wall. Consider revising the proposal to include the stone wall along the frontage. Provide a wall detail and a material sample if the wall is proposed. 10. Provide two additional large shade trees, 2%" caliper at planting, spaced 40 feet on center, along the west side of the accessway. 11. Revise the landscape schedule to indicate the caliper at planting for the cherry trees. 12. Revise the landscape plan to reduce the spacing of the western perimeter parking trees to 40' on center. 13. A comprehensive sign plan is required for multi -tenant buildings. Approval of a comprehensive sign plan is required prior to final ARB approval of this application. 14. Revise the site plan to include manufacturer's specifications for the gooseneck fixtures. Show that they emit less than 3,000 lumens or revise them to fixtures that are full cutoff. ATTACHMENTS Applicant's submittal items: 1. 2415 Ivy Road Site Plan 2. 2415 Ivy Road Architectural Drawings 3. 2415 Ivy Road Architectural Drawings — Color 4. 2415 Ivy Road East Elevation TABLE A This report is based on the following submittal items: Sheet # Drawing Name Drawing Date/Revision Date Site Plan 1 Cover Sheet 6/08/2020 2 Existing Conditions & Demolition Plan 6/08/2020 3 Layout and Utility Plan 6/08/2020 4 Grading & Drainage Plan 6/08/2020 5 Landscape Plan 6/08/2020 6 Notes & Details 6/08/2020 7 Notes & Details 6/08/2020 8 Utility & Drainage Profiles 6/08/2020 9 Drainage Map & Calculations 6/08/2020 10 Lighting Plan 6/08/2020 Architectural Drawin s A-1.0 Floor Plan 6/08/2020 A-1.1 Roof Plan 6/08/2020 A-1.2 Elevations 7/20/2020 A-1.3 Elevations 6/08/2020 A-1.4 Details 6/08/2020 A-1.5 Details & Wall Section 6/08/2020 A-1.6 Wall Section 6/08/2020 Architectural Drawings Color 1 Cover Sheet — Description & Compatibility 6/08/2020 2 Vicinity Map & Site Plan 6/08/2020 3 Rendered Elevations Front & East 6/08/2020 4 Existing Building Photos 6/08/2020 5 Photos of Building to East 6/08/2020 6 View from East 6/08/2020 7 View from West 6/08/2020 8 Photos of Brick Proposed 6/08/2020 9 Photos of Wall Screen Color, Mortar, Storefront & Paint 6/08/2020 10 Original Precast Window Op enin Detail that is to remain on the East side openings) 6/08/2020 11 Example of Garage Door Style 6/08/2020 2415 Ivy Road East Elevation 6/08/2020 0 COFFEE . . BOUTIQUE . YOGA . ANTIQUES . WINE SHOP 9 BAR FRONT ELEVATION Figure 2: Original Proposed South Elevation. February 27, 2020 FRONT ELEVATION Figure 3: Current Proposed South Elevation. June 08, 2020. BELLAIR BAR I; b6 10 Figure 4: Original canopy on the adjacent building to the east. II Figure S: (Top) The east side of the building. The back portion that is to remain unchanged. (Bottom) Current Proposed East Elevation. June 08, 2020. 12 � .rt�u ♦vim we rr t•a••y. ♦w . rr t �,' •l .0 •u. .v:.ui •wl•♦wvt. •ps aYst, . wn.raA �1sL.r=- r-±.•-T� ��i-r i• ♦.i ��cf-v Mr'Y /wi.'tOf2 -a•Y' flfs �f.ef�4 f♦ - •ar L�H •t Nrrr� � r • c♦ u.ca ►utW.V •t. �a.i.p. W�4' - - - ♦... Gaeta •=o�c ct•.� •auv _arn>. w.i ORIGINAL WEST ELEVATION D--til plc Figure 6. Original West Elevation (Above) and Current Proposed West Elevation. July 20, 2020. 13