HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-12-13
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FIN A L
DECEMBER 13, 2006
SECOND FLOOR, LANE AUDITORIUM
COUNTY OFFICE BUILDING
3:00 P.M.
1 . Call to Order.
2. Work Sessions:
a. 3:00 p.m. - 3:45 p.m. - Discussion: Alternatives to amend and update County Code regulating firing of
firearms in the County (deferred from November 1, 2006).
b. 4:00 p.m. - 5:15 p.m. - Mountain Overlay District and Rural Areas Resource Protection.
3. 5:15 p.m. - Recess.
6:00 P.M.
4. Call to Order.
5. Pledge of Allegiance.
6. Moment of Silence.
7. From the Public: Matters not Listed for Public Hearing on the Agenda.
8. Consent Agenda (on next page).
9. Red Hill CommunitY Well. PUBUC HEARING to amend the Jurisdictional Area Boundary of the Albemarle
County Service Authority to provide water service to Tax Map 87B, Parcels 4, 4A, 6, 6A, 6B, 7, 7A, 8, and 10,
located on Taylors Gap Road (Route 710) and Tax Map 87B, Parcels 9, 10A, 11, 12,60, 60A, 60B, and 61 located
on Red Hill School Road (Route 760).
10. ZMA-200S-007. Haden Place (SiGns #12.13). PROPOSAL: Rezone 6.69 acres from R-2 Residential (2 units!
acre) to NMD Neighborhood Model District - residential (3 - 34 units/acre) mixed with commercial, service and
industrial uses for 20 single family homes and 14 townhomes. TAX MAPIPARCEL: TM 55 Parcel 69 & TM 56
Parcel 9. MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: White Hall. (Continued from October 11,2006)
11. ZTA-2005-005. Temporary Fa"" Worker Housing. PUBUC HEARING to Amend Sections 3.1 ('Definitions"), 5
("Supplemental Regulationsj, and 10 ("Rural Areasj of Chapter 18, Zoning, of the Albemarle County Code. This
ordinance would amend Section 3.1 by adding definitions of "Farm", "Farm worker housing, Class A" and "Farm
worker housing, Class B"; Section 5 by adding supplemental regulations for temporary farm worker housing; and
Section 10 by adding temporary farm-worker housing facilities for 10 or fewer residents as a by-right use (farm
worker housing, Class A), and temporary farm-worker housing facilities for more than 10 residents as a use
requiring a special use permit (farm worker housing, Class B).
12. ZMA-2006-012. UVA Foundation-Advanced Research & TechnoloGv BuildinG Annex (Signs 35.36.40)
PUBUC HEARING - PROPOSAL: Rezoning on CO-Commercial Office (offices, supporting commercial and
service uses; and residential use by special use permit at 15 units/acre) zoned property to allow an additional
30,000 square feet for a building square footage total of 565,000. PROFFERS: Yes. EXISTING COMPREHEN-
SIVE PLAN LAND USE/DENSITY: Office Service - office uses, regional scale research, limited production and
marketing activities, supporting commercial, lodging and conference facilities, and residential (6.01-34 units/acre) in
the DeveloprnentArea. ENTRANCE CORRIDOR: Yes. LOCATION: Ray C. Hunt Drive in the Fontaine Research
Park, located on Fontaine Avenue, adjacent to the northeast of the Rt.291250 Bypass in Neighborhood 6 of the
Development Area. TAX MAPIPARCEL: TMP 76-17B, 1766. MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Samuel Miller.
13. From the Board: Committee Reports and Matters Not Listed on the Agenda.
14. Adjourn.
CONSENT AGENDA
FOR APPROVAL:
8.1 Approval of Minutes: March 13(A), May 10A/N, August 1 (A) and August 3(A), 2006.
8.2 Resolution authorizing the issuance of revenue bonds by the Industrial Development of the Town of Louisa, in an
amount not to exceed $8,000,000 for the benefit of the Region Ten Community Services Board, Inc.
8.3 Resolution authorizing the issuance of revenue bonds by the Industrial Development of Fluvanna County in an
amount not to exceed $4,000,000 for the benefit of the Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge, located at 250
Pantops Mountain Road in Albemarle County.
8.4 Resolution allowing the County to participate in VDoT's Revenue Sharing Program for FY 2007.
8.5 Resolution supporting Proposed Workforce Housing Legislation.
8.6 Resolution to accept road(s) in Crozet Glen Subdivision into the State Secondary System of Highways.
8.7 Resolution to accept road(s) in Country Oaks Subdivision into the State Secondary System of Highways.
8.8 Resolution to accept road(s) in Marshall Subdivision into the State Secondary System of Highways.
8.9 Resolution to accept road(s) in Grayrock, Phase N, Subdivision into the State Secondary System of Highways.
FOR INFORMATION:
8.10 Crozet Crossing Trust Fund - 2006 Annual Report.
ACTIONS
Board of Supervisors Meeting of December 13, 2006
December 14, 2006 '
I Call to order.
,. Meeting was called to order at 3:04 p.m. by
i the Chairman, Mr. Rooker. All BOS
members were present. Also present were
Bob Tucker, Larry Davis and Ella Carey.
Discussion: Alternatives to amend and update
County Code regulating firing of firearms in the
County (deferred from November 1, 2006).
. DIRECTED staff to draft an ordinance that
incorporated a ban discharging of firearms
in all districts except the RA district, and to
restrict discharging firearms in a safety
zone around dwellings and buildings in the
RA zone and within 100 yards of property
boundary lines of schools and parks. The
restrictions in the RA district would depend
on public input and may be scaled back to
only relate to neighborhoods which
petitioned the Board for specific
restrictions. Bring back for public hearing in
March.
Mountain Overlay District and Rural Areas
Resource Protection.
. All Planning Commission members were
present.
HELD. Continue discussion on January 10,
2007 at 3:00.
The Board recessed at 5:52 p.m. and
reconvened at 6:12 p.m.
From the Public: Matters not Listed for Public
Hearing on the Agenda.
. John Martin, of Free Union, spoke about
the action taken by the Board at the end of
the December 6th meeting to establish an
Economic Opportunity Fund. Expressed
concern about the public being left out of
the process.
John Cruickshank, of the Sierra Club,
thanked the BOS for signing the U.S.
Mayor's Climate Protection Agreement. He
asked that the Board organize a
Sustainability Council to develop a plan of
action. He presented Chairman Rooker
with a "Cool Cities" certificate of
appreciation.
Sue Chase, of the Charlottesville Center
for Peace and Justice, thanked the Board
for signing the U.S. Mayor's Climate
Protection Agreement. She urged the
Board to proceed with the next step in the
formation of a committee.
Tom Olivier. a resident of the Scottsville
District, expressed dissatisfaction with the
unwillingness of some members of the
Board to implement measures in the
Comprehensive Plan designed to protect
open spaces and natural resources.
Laurie Delehantv. of the Charlottesville
1.
Clerk: Schedule for public hearing for March
14th.
2.
Clerk: Schedule joint meeting with Planning
Commission on January 10th.
.
7.
.
.
.
.
Center for Peace and Justice thanked the I
Board for signing onto the Mayor's Climate
Protection Agreement.
. Loqan Blanco, of Charlottesville Peak Oil,
spoke to the Board about the
Relocalization Plan that a citizens' group in
Tompkins County, New York, created to
prepare for Peak Oil.
. Dave Buehrens signed up, but did not
speak.
. Stephen Bach, of Charlottesville Peak Oil,
asked the Board to support the creation of
a task force to deal with the issue of Peak
Oil.
. Jack Marshal, of ASAP, expressed
concerns about the actions taken by the
Board at the end of the December 6th
meeting. There was no public involvement
in the decision-making process.
. Tom Loach asked why Haden Place was
not listed as a public hearing. Mr. Davis
explained that the proffers were amended
and the request had to be readvertised for
public hearing.
. Jeff Werner, of PEC, expressed concerns
about the actions taken by the Board at the
end of its December 6th meeting. There
are numerous nonprofit groups in the
community that could use support from the
Board.
. Neil Williamson, with the Free Enterprise
Forum, responded to a comment made by
Mr. Werner, and stated that the Chair of
the Chamber of Commerce is a part of the
Tourism Committee and has worked
diligently for tourism. .
. Chairman Rooker recognized a group of
students from one of Western Albemarle's
government classes that were present at
the meeting.
8.2 Resolution authorizing the issuance of revenue (Attachment 1)
bonds by the Industrial Development of the
Town of Louisa, in an amount not to exceed Clerk: Forward resolution to McGuireWoods,
$8,000,000 for the benefit of the Region Ten Bond Counsel.
Community Services Board, Inc.
. ADOPTED the attached resolution.
8.3 Resolution authorizing the issuance of revenue (Attachment 2)
bonds by the Industrial Development of
Fluvanna County in an amount not to exceed Clerk: Forward resolution to McGuireWoods,
$4,000,000 for the benefit of the Westminster- Bond Counsel.
Canterbury of the Blue Ridge, located at 250
Pantops Mountain Road in Albemarle County.
. ADOPTED the attached resolution.
8.4 Resolution allowing the County to participate in (Attachment 3)
VDoT's Revenue Sharing Program for FY 2007.
. ADOPTED the attached resolution. Clerk: Forward resolution to Juandiego
Wade.
8.5 Resolution supporting Proposed Workforce (Attachment 4)
Housing Legislation.
. ADOPTED the attached resolution. Clerk: Forward resolution to Andy Bowman.
8.6 Resolution to accept road(s) in Crozet Glen (Attachment 5)
Subdivision into the State Secondary System of I
Highways. Clerk: Greg Cooley in Engineering.
. ADOPTED the attached resolution.
8.7 Resolution to accept road(s) in Country Oaks (Attachment 6)
Subdivision into the State Secondary System of
Highways. Clerk: Greg Cooley in Engineering.
. ADOPTED the attached resolution.
8.8 Resolution to accept road(s) in Marshall (Attachment 7)
Subdivision into the State Secondary System of
Highways. Clerk: Greg Cooley in Engineering.
. ADOPTED the attached resolution.
8.9 Resolution to accept road(s) in Grayrock, Phase (Attachment 8)
IV, Subdivision into the State Secondary
System of Highways. Clerk: Greg Cooley in Engineering.
. ADOPTED the attached resolution.
9. Red Hill Community Well.
. APPROVED, by a vote of 6:0, an
amendment to the jurisdictional area map
to allow for water only designation for the
properties Tax Map 87B, Parcels 4, 4A, 6,
6A, 6B, 7, 7 A, 8, and 10, located on
Taylors Gap Road (Route 710) and Tax
Map 87B, Parcels 9, 10A, 11, 12, 60, 60A,
60B, and 61 located on Red Hill School
Road (Route 760).
10. ZMA-2005-007. Haden Place (Si~:ms #12.13). Clerk: Schedule on a future agenda.
. DEFFERED ZMA-2005-007, at the
applicants' request, until the final plans and
proffers have been prepared for public
hearing.
11. ZTA-2005-005. Temporary Farm Worker (Attachment 9)
HousinQ.
. APPROVED, by a vote of 6:0, the attached Clerk: Forward adopted ordinance to County
ordinance. Attorney's office and Community
Development.
12. ZMA-2006-012. UVA Foundation-Advanced
Research & TechnoloQY BuildinQ Annex
(SiQns 35,36.40)
. APPROVED ZMA-2006-012, by a vote of
6:0, as proffered by the applicant and
signed November 30, 2006.
13. From the Board: Committee Reports and
Matters Not Listed on the Agenda.
David Wyant
. Held meeting on Living Wage issue; need
further discussion before ready to come
back to Board.
. Development Review Task Force
Committee should be ready to report to the
Board in February.
. Discussed cleaning of sidewalks during
snow times. Mr. Davis commented that
counties do not have the authority require
homeowners to clean sidewalk. Mr.
Rooker suggested including a request for
enabling legislation in VACo's legislative
agenda.
Sallv Thomas
. Thanked the Board and staff for the letter
on Preservation Tax Credit Conservation
Value Criteria. It made a significant
impact.
. Asked Board to consider adopting, as part
of the County ordinance, lighting
requirements for residential development.
Mr. Davis commented that the County has
broad authority to regulate lighting. The
Board DIRECTED staff to bring back a staff
report.
Lindsay Dorrier
. Tickets are still available for the Meriwether
Lewis event this Friday.
. A new program at the Jail is allowing
inmates to clean up entrances into the
County.
Ken Boyd
. Responded to concerns raised about
actions taken by the Board at the end of its
meeting on December 6th.
. Suggested the Board hold work session
on Mr. Slutzky's TOR proposal.
CONSENSUS of the Board to schedule on
an agenda, and that staff prepare a report.
David Slutzky
. He will be making an informal presentation
on his TDR proposal to the 5Cs on
Thursday, December 14, between 4 and 6.
Dennis Rooker
. Thanked the Board for allowing him to
serve as Chairman for the last two years.
/mrh
Attachment 1
Attachment 2
Attachment 3
Attachment 4
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Attachment 7
Attachment 8
Attachment 9
IDA - Region Ten Resolution
IDA - Westminster-Canterbury Resolution
VDoT Revenue Sharing Resolution
Proposed Workforce Housing Legislation Resolution
Crozet Glen Resolution
Country Oaks Subdivision Resolution
Marshall Subdivision Resolution
Grayrock Subdivision, Phase IV Resolution
ZTA-2005-005 Temporary Farm Work Housing Ordinance
Attachment 1
RESOLUTION
OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of the Town of Louisa, Virginia (the "Authority"),
has been requested by Region Ten Community Services Board, Inc. (the "Company"), a non-profit,
Virginia nonstock corporation, to approve the issuance of a revenue bond in an amount not to exceed
$8,000,000 ("Bond") to assist the Company in (1) refinancing the Industrial Development Authority of
Albemarle County, Virginia's $5,000,000 Variable Rate Community Services Facilities Revenue Bonds
(Region Ten Community Services Board, Inc.), Series 1999, issued on August 31, 1999 originally issued
to finance and refinance Company facilities located in the County of Albemarle, Virginia and the City of
Charlottesville, Virginia (2) financing the acquisition, construction, renovation and equipping of the
property known as Mountainwood, to house the Company's administrative offices and community
services, located on an approximately 9 acre tract of land on Old Lynchburg Road, in the County of
Albemarle, Virginia and (3) financing the acquisition, construction, renovation and equipping of the Nelson
County Counseling Center located at Tanbark Plaza, Lovingston, Virginia in the County of Nelson,
Virginia (collectively, the "Project"), and has held a public hearing on December 7,2006;
WHEREAS, Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"),
provides that the governmental unit having jurisdiction over the area in which any facility financed with the
proceeds of private activity bonds is located must approve the issuance of the bonds;
WHEREAS, a portion of the Project is to be located in the County of Albemarle, Virginia (the
"County") and the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia ("Board") constitutes the
highest elected governmental unit of the County;
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 147(f) of the Code, the public hearing held by the
Authority was within 100 miles of the County;
WHEREAS, for purposes of Section 15.2-4906 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended (the
"Virginia Code"), the Authority is issuing the portion of the Bond relating to the portion of the Project
located in the County on behalf of the County.
WHEREAS, the Authority has recommended that the Board approve the issuance of the Bond;
and
WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving the issuance of the Bond, subject to
the terms to be agreed upon, a certificate of the public hearing and a Fiscal Impact Statement have been
filed with the Board.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA:
The Board approves the issuance of the Bond by the Authority for the benefit of the Company, as
required by Section 147(f) of the Code and Section 15.2-4906 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as
amended ("Virginia Code") to permit the Authority to assist in the financing of the Project.
The Board concurs with the resolution to be adopted by the Authority and approves the issuance
of the Bond by the Authority for the benefit of the Company as required by Section 15.2-4905 of the
Virginia Code.
The approval of the issuance of the Bond does not constitute an endorsement to a prospective
purchaser of the Bond of the creditworthiness of the Project or the Company.
This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
Attachment 2
RESOLUTION
OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of Fluvanna County, Virginia (the "Authority"),
has been asked by Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge (the "Company"), a non-profit, Virginia
nonstock corporation, to approve the issuance of a revenue bond in an amount not to exceed $4,000,000
("Bond") to assist the Company in financing the costs of capital improvements at the Company's existing
residential care retirement facility located at 250 Pantops Mountain Road in the County of Albemarle,
Virginia including without limitation the construction and equipping of additional cottages at the facility
("Project"), and has held a public hearing on November 29, 2006;
WHEREAS, Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"),
provides that the governmental unit having jurisdiction over the area in which any facility financed with the
proceeds of private activity bonds is located must approve the issuance of the bonds;
WHEREAS, the Project is to be located in the County of Albemarle, Virginia (the "County") and
the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia ("Board") constitutes the highest elected
governmental unit of the County;
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 147(f) of the Code, the public hearing held by the
Authority was within 100 miles of the County;
WHEREAS, for purposes of Section 15.2-4906 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended (the
"Virginia Code"), the Authority is issuing the Bond on behalf of the County.
and
WHEREAS, the Authority has recommended that the Board approve the issuance of the Bond;
WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving the issuance of the Bond, subject to
the terms to be agreed upon, a certificate of the public hearing and a Fiscal Impact Statement have been
filed with the Board.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA:
1. The Board approves the issuance of the Bond by the Authority for the benefit of the
Company, as required by Section 147(f) of the Code and Section 15.2-4906 of the Virginia Code to permit
the Authority to assist in the financing of the Project.
2. The Board concurs with the resolution to be adopted by the Fluvanna Authority and
approves the issuance of the Bond by the Authority for the benefit of the Company as required by Section
15.2-4905 of the Act.
3. The approval of the issuance of the Bond does not constitute an endorsement to a
prospective purchaser of the Bond of the creditworthiness of the Project or the Company.
This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
Attachment 3
RESOLUTION TO PARTICPATE IN
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
REVENUE SHARING PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2007
WHEREAS, the County of Albemarle desires to submit an application for allocation of funds of up
to $1.5 million through the Virginia Department of Transportation Fiscal Year 2006/07, Revenue Sharing
Program ; and
WHEREAS, $1.5 million of these funds are requested to fund the Meadow Creek Parkway for
new construction between Melbourne Road and 0.0466 miles north Norfolk Southern Railway; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors hereby
requests that the application for $1.5 million from the Virginia Department of Transportation Revenue
Sharing Program be approved.
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true and correct copy of a
Resolution duly adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County by a vote of six to zero,
recorded below, at a meeting held on December 13, 2006.
Attachment 4
RESOLUTION TO SUPPORT AMENDMENTS
TO EXISTING WORKFORCE HOUSING LEGISLATION
WHEREAS, Prince William County desires to request legislation to amend the Virginia Code by
adding ~ 15.2-542 to enable counties under the County Executive form of government broader and less
restricted authority to provide housing assistance to local employees; and
WHEREAS, proposed Virginia Code ~ 15.2-542 would apply to the County Executive form of
Government; and
WHEREAS, Albemarle County, like Prince William County, operates under the County Executive
form of government; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Virginia Code ~ 15.2-542 would broaden existing enabling authority
granted in Virginia Code ~ 15.2-958.2; and
WHEREAS, the County of Albemarle generally supports the expansion of enabling authority for
localities; and
WHEREAS, the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors adopted a Strategic Objective stating:
"By June 30, 2010, working in partnership with others, increase affordable housing opportunities for those
who work and/or live in Albemarle County."
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County
does hereby support amending the Virginia Code by adding ~ 15.2-542 to allow counties under the
County Executive form of government to provide funds, other than state funds, to provide grants, loans
and other assistance for county and school board employees, as well as employees of local constitutional
officers, to purchase or rent residences, for use as the employee's principal residence, within the county.
Attachment 5
The Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, in regular meeting on the 6th day
of December 2006, adopted the following resolution:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the street(s) in Crozet Glen Subdivision, described on the attached Additions Form
LA-5(A) dated December 13, 2006, fully incorporated herein by reference, is shown on plats recorded in
the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Albemarle County, Virqinia; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised the
Board that the street(s) meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements of the
Virginia Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors
requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the street(s) in Crozet Glen Subdivision, as
described on the attached Additions Form LA-5(A) dated December 13, 2006, to the secondary system
of state highways, pursuant to ~33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street
Requirements; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as
described, exclusive of any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage as described on the
recorded plats; and
FURTHER RESOLVED that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident
Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation.
Attachment 6
The Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, in regular meeting on the 6th day
of December 2006, adopted the following resolution:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the street(s) in Country Oaks Subdivision described on the attached Additions
Form LA-5(A) dated December 13, 2006, fully incorporated herein by reference, is shown on plats
recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Albemarle County, Virqinia; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised the
Board that the street(s) meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements of the
Virginia Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors
requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the street(s) in Country Oaks Subdivision as
described on the attached Additions Form LA-5(A) dated December 13, 2006, to the secondary system
of state highways, pursuant to ~33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street
Requirements; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as
described, exclusive of any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage as described on the
recorded plats; and
FURTHER RESOLVED that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident
Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation.
Attachment 7
The Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, in regular meeting on the 6th day
of December 2006, adopted the following resolution:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the street(s) in Marshall Subdivision described on the attached Additions Form LA-
5(A) dated December 13, 2006, fully incorporated herein by reference, is shown on plats recorded in the
Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Albemarle County, Virqinia; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised the
Board that the street(s) meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements of the
Virginia Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors
requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the street(s) in Marshall Subdivision as
described on the attached Additions Form LA-5(A) dated December 13, 2006, to the secondary system
of state highways, pursuant to ~33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street
Requirements; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as
described, exclusive of any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage as described on the
recorded plats; and
FURTHER RESOLVED that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident
Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation.
Attachment 8
The Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, in regular meeting on the 6th day
of December 2006, adopted the following resolution:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the street(s) in Grayrock Subdivision, Phase IV, described on the attached
Additions Form LA-5(A) dated December 13, 2006, fully incorporated herein by reference, is shown on
plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Albemarle County. Virqinia; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised the
Board that the street(s) meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements of the
Virginia Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors
requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the street(s) in Grayrock Subdivision, Phase
IV, as described on the attached Additions Form LA-5(A) dated December 13, 2006, to the secondary
system of state highways, pursuant to ~33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision
Street Requirements; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as
described, exclusive of any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage as described on the
recorded plats; and
FURTHER RESOLVED that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident
Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation.
Attachment 9
ORDINANCE NO. 06-18(2)
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 18, ZONING, ARTICLE I, GENERAL PROVISIONS, ARTICLE
II, BASIC REGULATIONS, AND ARTICLE III, DISTRICT REGULATIONS, OF THE CODE OF THE
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA
BE IT ORDAIN ED By the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia, that Chapter 18,
Zoning, Article I, General Regulations, Article II, Basic Regulations, and Article III, District Regulations, is
hereby amended and reordained as follows:
By Amending:
Sec. 3.1
Sec. 10.2.1
Sec. 10.2.2
Definitions
By right
By special use permit
By Adding:
Sec. 5.1.44
Farm worker housing
Chapter 18. Zoning
Article I. General Regulations
Sec. 3.1 Definitions
Farm: The term "farm" means one or more parcels of land, whether such parcels are abutting or not,
operated under the same management and whose primary use is agriculture.
Farm worker housing, Class A: The term "Farm worker housing, Class A" means: (i) structures located
on a farm that are designed and arranged to be occupied exclusively by up to ten (10) persons employed
to work on the farm on which the structures are located for seasonal agriculture work or up to ten (10)
persons including the farm workers and their immediate families; (ii) the number of such structures
designed and arranged for sleeping does not exceed two (2); and (iii) no single structure contains all of
the following: provisions for sleeping, eating, food preparation, and sanitation (bathing and/or toilets).
Farm worker housing, Class B: The term "Farm worker housing, Class B" means: (i) either structures
located on a farm that are designed and arranged to be occupied exclusively by more than ten (10)
persons employed to work on the farm on which the structures are located for seasonal agriculture work
or more than ten (10) persons including the farm workers and their immediate families, or the number of
such structures designed and arranged for sleeping is three (3) or more, regardless of the number of farm
workers or their family members who could sleep in such structures; and (ii) no single structure contains
all of the following: provisions for sleeping, eating, food preparation, and sanitation (bathing and/or
toilets ).
Seasonal agriculture work: The term "seasonal agriculture work" means work by a person employed to
work on a farm to perform either field work related to planting, cultivating, work related to keeping
livestock and/or poultry, or harvesting operations, or work related to canning, packing, ginning, seed
conditioning or related agriculture operations, and the work pertains to or is of the kind exclusively
performed at certain seasons or periods of the year and which, from its nature, may not be continuous or
carried on throughout the year. A person who moves from one seasonal activity to another while
employed by the farm to perform agriculture work is engaged in seasonal agriculture work even though
he or she may continue to be employed by the farm throughout the year.
Article II. Basic Regulations
Sec. 5.1.44 Farm worker housing
Each farm worker housing facility shall be subject to the following:
a. Concept plan to be submitted with application for farm worker housing. Before applying for the
first building permit for a farm worker housing, Class A, facility, or in addition to any other
information required to be submitted for a farm worker housing, Class B, special use permit, the
applicant shall submit a concept plan meeting the requirements of section 5.1.44(b).
b. Contents of concept plan. The concept plan shall show the following: (i) the boundary lines of the
farm (may be shown on an inset map if necessary); (ii) the location and general layout of the
proposed structures at a scale of not more than one (1) inch equals forty (40) feet; (iii) vehicular
access, travelways and parking for the facility; (iv) topography (with a contour interval of no
greater than ten (10) feet); (v) critical slopes; (vi) streams, stream buffers and floodplains; (vii)
source(s) of water for fire suppression; (viii) building setback lines as provided in subsection
5.1.44(g) below; and (ix) outdoor lighting. The concept plan also shall include a written
description of each structure's construction and materials used, and the number of persons to be
housed in the farm worker housing facility.
c. Notice of receipt of concept plan to abutting owners. The zoning administrator shall send notice
of the receipt of a concept plan as follows:
1. Farm worker housing, Class A, facility: For each concept plan received for a farm worker
housing, Class A, facility, the zoning administrator shall send notice to the owner of each
lot abutting the parcel for which a concept plan has been received within ten (10) days
after submittal of the concept plan deemed by the zoning administrator to be complete.
The notice shall include a copy of the concept plan and shall advise each recipient of the
right to submit written comments within ten (10) days of the date of the notice and the
right to request planning commission review as provided in section 5.1.44(d). Notice
mailed to the abutting owner shall be mailed to the last known address of the owner, and
mailing the notice to the address shown on the current real estate tax assessment
records of the county shall be deemed compliance with this requirement. The failure of
an abutting owner to receive the notice required by this section shall not affect the validity
of an approved concept plan or zoning compliance clearance.
2. Farm worker housing, Class B, facility: For each concept plan received for a farm worker
housing, Class B, facility, notice to the owner of each lot abutting the parcel for which a
concept plan has been received shall be provided in conjunction with the notice required
for the special use permit.
d. Request for planning commission review and action on farm worker housing, Class A, facility
concept plan. An abutting owner to whom notice for a farm worker housing, Class A, facility
concept plan under section 5.1.44(c)(1) and who submitted timely written comments about the
concept plan as provided therein may request that the planning commission review and act on
the concept plan. The request shall be in writing, state the reasons why the commission should
review the concept plan, and be filed with the director of planning within ten (10) days after the
date of the notice from the zoning administrator.
e. Review and action on concept plan. A concept plan shall be reviewed and acted upon as follows:
1. Farm worker housing, Class A, facility. For a farm worker housing, Class A, facility, the
concept plan shall be approved by the zoning administrator or the planning commission,
as the case may be, before any building permit is issued for the facility. The concept plan
shall be approved by the zoning administrator or the commission if it satisfies all
applicable requirements of the zoning ordinance and the design is determined to not be a
substantial detriment to abutting parcels. In approving the concept plan, the zoning
administrator or the commission may impose reasonable conditions to mitigate impacts
on abutting parcels arising from facility. The commission shall give due consideration to
the recommendations of the zoning administrator, the director of planning and other
officials. In addition, the commission may consider such other evidence as it deems
necessary for a proper review of the application.
2. Farm worker housing, Class B, facility. For a farm worker housing, Class B, facility, the
concept plan shall be reviewed and acted upon in conjunction with the special use permit.
f. Farm worker housing facilities; permissible structures. Farm worker housing facilities shall not
use motor vehicles or major recreational equipment, as that term is defined in section 4.12.3(b)(1)
of this chapter, to provide for sleeping, eating, food preparation, or sanitation (bathing and/or
toilets).
g. Minimum yards. Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the minimum front yard shall
be seventy-five (75) feet. The minimum side and rear yards shall be fifty (50) feet. All yards shall
be measured from the farm worker housing structures.
h. Zoning compliance clearance. The owner shall obtain a zoning compliance clearance from the
zoning administrator as provided in section 31.2.3.2 of this chapter before a farm worker housing
facility is occupied, subject to the following additional requirements:
1. The applicant shall apply for a zoning compliance clearance at least thirty (30) days prior
to the first expected occupation of the farm worker housing facility. The application shall
be submitted to the zoning administrator.
2. The zoning compliance clearance application shall include all of the following information:
a. Written approval of the farm worker housing facility as a migrant labor camp
under 12 V AC 5-501-10 et seq., the food preparation area, the private water
supply, and the septic disposal system by the Virginia Department of Health.
b. Approval of the access to the site from a public street by the Virginia Department
of Transportation; provided that nothing herein shall be deemed to require that a
commercial entrance be constructed unless such an entrance is required by the
Virginia Department of Transportation.
c. Written approval of the adequacy of the access to the site for emergency
vehicles by the fire marshal.
d. Written approval of the adequacy of the structures intended for human habitation
by the building official.
3. Upon the zoning administrator's determination that all requirements of the zoning
ordinance are satisfied, that all conditions of the special use permit authorizing a farm
worker housing, Class B, facility, are satisfied, and upon receipt of the approvals and
documents required in section 5.1.44(h)(2), the zoning administrator shall issue a zoning
compliance clearance for the facility.
i. Use of farm worker housing facility by workers and their families only. A farm worker housing
facility shall be occupied only by persons employed to work on the farm on which the structures
are located for seasonal agriculture work and their immediate families as provided herein.
j. Use of farm worker housing facility when not occupied. When not occupied by seasonal farm
workers, farm worker housing facilities may be used for any use accessory to a primary
agriculture use.
Article III. District Regulations
Sec. 10.2.1 By right
The following uses shall be permitted in any RA district subject to the requirements and limitations of
these regulations:
23. Farm worker housing, Class A (up to ten occupants and up to two sleeping structures)
(reference 5.1.44).
Sec. 10.2.2 By special use permit
-
The following uses shall be permitted only by special use permit approved by the board of supervisors
pursuant to section 31.2.4: (Added 10-9-02)
51. Farm worker housing, Class B (more than ten occupants or more than two sleeping
structures) (reference 5.1.44).
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Work Session on Regulating the Discharge of
Firearms
AGENDA DATE:
December 13, 2006
ACTION: X
INFORMATION:
SU BJ ECT IPROPOSALlREQU EST:
Discussion of alternatives to amend and update
County Code regulating firing firearms in the County
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
STAFF CONTACT(S):.
Tucker, Foley, Davis
ATTACHMENTS: Yes
LEGAL REVIEW: Yes
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND:
Due to a recent shooting incident in a rural subdivision and at the request of the Commonwealth's Attorney, the Board
asked that staff review the existing County ordinances and enabling authority to determine if additional appropriate
restrictions could be placed on shooting firearms in areas where it creates a danger to public safety and to assure that the
County Code was in compliance with enabling legislation. A preliminary draft ordinance was reviewed by the Board at its
September 6th meeting and a revised draft was discussed at the November 1 st meeting. The Board asked that staff prepare
alternative approaches for the Board's consideration and that this matter be placed on a future agenda for further
discussion.
STRATEGIC PLAN:
Goal: 1: Enhance the Quality of Life for all Albemarle County Residents.
DISCUSSION:
Staff has prepared the attached "Alternative Proposals to Regulate the Discharge of Firearms". (See Attachment A) It
presents possible definitions, exceptions, and regulatory options and six alternatives for the Board's discussion. Each
alternative has a brief analysis of advantages and disadvantages.
If the Board reaches consensus on an alternative approach, the County Attorney can draft an ordinance that would
implement that approach which can then be set for public hearing.
BUDGET IMPACT:
An ordinance adopted to implement restrictions on discharging firearms will not have any significant budget impact.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
This information and the attached "Alternative Proposals to Regulate the Discharge of Firearms" are prepared for the
Board's further discussion. If the Board finds it appropriate to regulate the discharge of firearms throughout the County
except in the RA District and in RA Subdivisions upon petition, staff recommends Alternative 5. If the Board finds it
appropriate to regulate the discharge of firearms countywide, staff recommends Alternative 6.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A - "Alternative Proposals to Regulate the Discharge of Firearms"
Attachment B - November 1,2006 Executive Summary
Attachment C - Virginia Code S 29.1-527
Attachment D - Virginia Code S 29.1-529
06.181
Attachment A
ALTERNATIVE PROPOSALS TO REGULATE DISCHARGE OF FIREARMS
PROPOSED DEFINITIONS:
Dwelling: A building, a part of a building, a mobile or manufactured home, or other enclosed
space that is used or intended for use as a place where one or more people reside. The term shall not
include a hunting cabin.
Firearm: A rifle, shotgun, pistol, air gun, air rifle, BB gun, pellet gun or similar devices,
designed to expel a projectile through a gun barrel of any length by means of explosives or expansion or
release of compressed air or gas.
Residential district: Any district described as YR, R-l, R-2, R-4, R-6, R-l 0, R-15, NMD, PUD
or PRD on the official zoning map of the county.
PROPOSED EXCEPTIONS:
1. The discharge of firearms in defense of person or property as otherwise permitted by law;
(in current county code)
2. The discharge of fiream1s on any target, trap or skeet range or hunting preserve lawfully
existing upon the date of adoption of this section or hereafter established in compliance with all other
provisions of this Code or other county ordinances or state law;
3. The discharge of firearms on any target or rifle range established and operated by the
police or other law enforcement department;
4. The discharge of firearms in a private below ground level basement or cellar target range;
5. The discharge of firearms to kill any dangerous or destructive wild animal;
6. The discharge of firearms to legally euthanize any sick or wounded animal;
7. The discharge of firearms by any duly authorized police officer or law enforcement
official acting in the proper performance of his duties;
8. The discharge of firearms with blank cartridges in theatrical performances, sporting
events, or in the firing of salutes at military funerals or other military affairs.
9. The discharge oftirearms for the purpose of killing deer pursuant to Va. Code S 29.1-529,
on land of at least five acres that is zoned RA. (required by state law, see Attachment D)
PROPOSED OPTIONS FOR RESTRICTED AREAS:
A. Residential Districts. Within boundaries of all residential districts. (area restricted under
current County Code)
B. County wide safety zone. County wide - within 200 yards from any dwelling (without
permission of the owner or occupant), business establishment, public building, public
gathering, or public meeting place. (distance of restricted area could be reduced)(concept
included in draft ordinance previous~v discussed by Board)
C. County wide except in RA. County wide except property that is zoned RA.
D. RA subdivisions by petition. Within platted boundary of an RA zoned subdivision if
approved by ordinance upon petition of the owners of the majority of the lots within the
subdivision.
E. RA safety zone. RA zoning district - within 200 yards from any dwelling (without
permission of the owner or occupant), business establishment, public building, public
gathering, or public meeting place within the RA zoning district. (distance of restricted area
could be reduced)(concept included in draft ordinance previously discussed by Board)
1
Attachment A
F. School and park restrictions. Within 100 yards of any property line of a public school or
county or regional park. (enabled by Virginia Code c9 29.1-527, see Attachment C)
ALTERNATIVE 1:
Option A (residential districts) {no change to County Code}
Advantages:
1. Has been in effect since 1981 withfew enforcement problems.
2. Prohibits shooting in most growth area subdivisions. (NMD district needs to be added to
definition of "residential district ')
Disadvantages:
1. Does not apply to commercial areas of the county. Shooting that is not "reckless" can occur
in non-residential districts.
2. Does not apply to RA subdivisions.
3. Does not apply to commercial buildings, schools, parks, or public meeting places in areas of
the County zoned RA or non-residential.
4. Does not provide for any exceptions except exception (l). (Other exceptions could be added to
existing County Code)
ALTERNATIVE 2:
Option A (residential districts) plus Option B (county wide safety zone) {draft ordinance
presented to Board on November 1, 2006}
Advantages:
1. Option A component continues to protect residentially zoned districts.
2. Option B component has been successfully adopted and administered in similar localities.
(Chesterfield, Prince William, Hanover, and Fauquier)
3. Uniformly applies to similar structures throughout county. Would apply to all
neighborhoods, businesses, and public places.
4. Would prohibit shooting close to where people, live, work, or meet.
Disadvantages:
1. May create false sense of safety ifcareless shooting still occurs more than 200 yards from
structures or residential districts.
2. 200 yards could overly restrict responsible hunting in rural areas. (distance can be reduced,
other ordinances have a 100 yard distance)
3. May be inconsistent with reasonable expectation of permitted shooting activities in rural
areas.
ALTERNATIVE 3:
Option C (County wide except in RA)
Advantages:
1. Protects all residential and commercial zoned properties.
2. Eliminates issues related to establishing "safety zones ".
3. Would not restrict hunting or shooting in rural areas.
Disadvantages:
1. Would not apply to dwellings or subdivisions in areas of the County zoned RA.
2. Would not apply to commercial buildings, schools, parks, or public meeting places in areas
of the County zoned RA.
2
Attachment A
ALTERNATIVE 4:
Option C (County wide except in RA) plus Option D (RA subdivisions by petition)
Advantages:
J. Same as Alternative3 except it would apply in RA subdivisions where ordinance is initiated
by property owners.
2. May not unnecessarily restrict hunting or shooting in rural areas.
Disadvantages:
J. Would not apply to all dwellings or subdivisions in areas of the County zoned RA.
2. Would not apply to commercial buildings, schools, parks. or public meeting places in areas
of the County zoned RA.
3. Option D component would require neighborhoods to take position on potentially divisive
and emotional issue to meet petition requirement.
4. Option D could require the Board to hold multiple public hearings on ordinances to include
individual subdivisions in restricted areas.
5. Would be more complicated to enforce because boundaries of subdivisions are not clearly
delineated and restrictions would not appZv generally.
6. May not create substantial protected area for dwellings on the boundaries of RA subdivisions
that petition to be included. (houses could be located as close as 20 feet from RA area
outside of platted subdivision)
ALTERNATIVE 5
Option C (County wide except in RA) plus Option D (RA subdivisions by petition) plus
Option F (school and park restrictions)
Advantages:
J. Same as Alternative 4 except would provide J 00 yard safety zone from property line of
schools and parks.
Disadvantages:
J. Same as Alternative 4 except it would provide J 00 yard safety zone from property line of
schools and parks.
ALTERNATIVE 6
Option C (County wide except in RA) plus Option E (RA safety zone)
Advantages:
1. Option C component protects residential and commercial zoned districts.
2. Option E component has been successfiilly adopted and administered in similar localities.
(Chesterfield, Prince William, Hanover, and Fauquier)
3. Uniformly applies to similar structures throughout the RA zoning district. Would apply to all
rural zoned neighborhoods, businesses, and public places.
4. Would prohibit shooting close to where people, live, work, or meet in the rural areas.
Disadvantages:
J. May create false sense of safety if careless shooting still occurs more than 200 yards from
structures or subdivisions in the rural areas.
2. 200 yards could overly restrict responsible hunting in rural areas. (distance can be reduced,
other ordinances have a J 00 yard distance).
3. May be inconsistent with reasonable expectation of permitted shooting activities in rural
areas.
3
Attachment B - Nov. 1, 2006 Executive Summary
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Ordinance to amend County Code S 10-107
Firearms-Discharging within residential districts and
S 10-109 Standing or walking with loaded rifle or
shotgun
AGENDA DATE:
November 1, 2006
ACTION: X
INFORMATION:
SU BJ ECT/PROPOSALlREQU EST:
Discussion of proposed ordinance to amend and
update County Code regulating firing and carrying
firearms in certain areas
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS: Yes
STAFF CONTACT(S):.
Tucker, Foley, Davis
REVIEWED BY:
LEGAL REVIEW: Yes
BACKGROUND:
Due to a recent shooting incident in a rural subdivision and at the request of the Commonwealth's Attorney, the Board
asked that staff review the existing County ordinances and enabling authority to determine if additional appropriate
restrictions could be placed on shooting firearms in areas where it creates a danger to public safety and to assure that the
County Code was in compliance with enabling legislation. A preliminary draft ordinance was reviewed by the Board at its
September 6th meeting and the Board asked that this matter be placed on a future agenda for further discussion and input
from the Commonwealth's Attorney and the Chief of Police. A revised draft ordinance has been prepared and is attached
for purposes of discussion.
Virginia Code S 15.2-1209 enables counties to prohibit the outdoor shooting of firearms or arrows from bows in areas of
the county which are in the opinion of the governing body so heavily populated as to make such conduct dangerous to the
inhabitants thereof. Pursuant to this authority Albemarle County has existing County Code S 10-107 restricting the
discharge of firearms within subdivisions that are within residential zoning districts. This code section, however, does not
restrict the discharge of a firearm in an RA subdivision or within any non-residential zoning district.
Virginia Code S 15.2-1209.1 enables counties to prohibit any person from carrying or having in his possession a loaded
firearm while on any part of a public highway within the county. Pursuant to this authority Albemarle County has existing
County Code S 10-109 restricting such conduct. However, a 2004 amendment to the enabling authority now requires an
exemption in any local ordinance for persons authorized to hunt on the private property on both sides of the highway along
which he is standing or walking. County Code S 10-109 currently does not contain this required exemption.
The Virginia Code also enables counties to adopt ordinances regulating the transporting of a loaded rifle or shotgun in a
vehicle on public roads, hunting within fifty feet of any primary or secondary highway and shooting in or across any road or
within the right of way. County Code SS 10-108, 10-110, and 10-111 exist which establish these restrictions consistent with
state law.
STRATEGIC PLAN:
Goal: 1: Enhance the Quality of Life for all Albemarle County Residents.
DISCUSSION:
Virginia Code S 15.2-1209 enables the governing body to determine which areas of a county are so heavily populated so as
to make shooting of firearms or arrows dangerous to the inhabitants thereof. Pursuant to this authority localities such as
Chesterfield, Hanover, Fauquier, and Prince William have restricted shooting of firearms in close proximity to certain
dwellings or structures. The Chesterfield ordinance, for example, restricts discharging any firearm within 200 yards of a
dwelling of another, a business establishment, a public building, a public gathering, or a public meeting place. This
approach designates areas of the county where discharging a firearm may reasonably endanger people who have a
legitimate expectation to be safe from such activities. Counties generally have found a reasonable distance from dwellings
or structures within which to restrict discharging a firearm to be from 100 yards to 200 yards.
Attachment B - Nov. 1, 2006 Executive Summary
The attached draft ordinance to amend County Code ~ 10-1 07continues the existing restriction on discharging firearms
within residential zoned subdivisions but in addition restricts discharging a firearm anywhere in the County within 200 yards
of a dwelling of another, a business establishment, a public building, a public gathering, or a public meeting place. This
restriction would address shooting in close proximity to dwellings of others located in the RA district and address the
discharging of firearms in other non-residential districts. Currently there is no ordinance prohibiting the discharge of
firearms in commercial districts in the County. The proposed ordinance would also amend the definition of residential
district to include the Neighborhood Model District. In addition, the ordinance includes an exception, now required by state
law, to permit shooting deer on five acre lots zoned for agricultural use when the shooting is authorized by the Department
of Game and Inland Fisheries. The proposed ordinance does not address the shooting of arrows.
The attached revised draft ordinance differs somewhat from the draft ordinance previously reviewed by the Board on
September 6th. The attached ordinance allows for a discharge of a weapon within 200 yards of a dwelling with prior written
permission of the owner or occupant of the dwelling. It also sets forth an additional seven circumstances where
discharging a firearm is permitted. The total of nine circumstances where discharging a firearm is permitted is set forth in
Subsection C of Section 10-107.
As a housekeeping measure, the proposed ordinance also amends County Code ~ 10-109 to include the exception to the
prohibition of carrying a loaded firearm on a public highway if the person carrying the firearm is authorized to hunt on the
private property on both sides of the highway along which he is standing or walking. The exception is required by the state
enabling authority.
BUDGET IMPACT:
This ordinance does not have any anticipated budget impact.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
This information and draft ordinance is prepared for the Board's further discussion.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A-- Ordinance to amend County Code ~~ 10-107 and 10-109 (September 7, 2006 Draft)
Attachment B-- Virginia Code ~~ 15.2-1209 and 15.2-1209.1
2
Attachment B - Nov. 1,2006 Executive Summary
Attachment A - Draft Ordinance: September 7,2006
ORDINANCE NO. 06-10(x)
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 10, OFFENSES--MISCELLANEOUS, OF THE CODE OF THE
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA
BE IT ORDAINED By the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia, that Chapter 10,
Offenses--Miscellaneous, of the Code of the County of Albemarle, is hereby amended and reordained as
follows:
By Amending:
Sec. 10-107 Firearms-Discharging within residential districts
Sec. 10-109 Standing or walking with loaded rifle or shotgun
CHAPTER 10. OFFENSES--MISCELLANEOUS
Sec. 10-107 Firearms--Discharging within residential districts: 200 yard safety zone.
A. It shall be unlawful for any person to discharge any firearm within the boundaries of any
residential district within the county, provided, however, that no person discharging a fiream1 within such a
district in defense of person or property as other.vise pennitted by 1m,>,' shall be deemed to have violated this
section.
B. It shall be unlawful for any person tPcl~(;harge any firearm an'ffi'h~re in the county within 200
yards of a (i) dwelling of another withmlUl:!e~j:)rior written oel111ission of the owner or occuoant of the
dwellin~-1iiLbusin~~s establishment; (iii) public building; (iv). publicgatherinlZ; or (ivLpublic meeting
].1lace.
r~o.c-cc NotwithstandingJlroyisionsJ&al1Qj])~QischarlZinlZ a firearm within such restricted areas is
R~llTIitted in the followinK.\;ircumstances:
1. The discharge offir~<lIJ11s in defense Qfp~rson or nropertY<l~ otherwise peIl11iJted bv law:
~. The dischaflZe offirearm~on an~Jarget, trao or ske~tranlZe or huntingRreserve lawfully
~xistin~ upon the date of adoption Qfthis section or hereafter establish~d in compliance with all other
IJfOvisions of this Code or other countborcjinanc.es or sta!~ law;
3.. The discharge Of firearms on ~ID' target or riJl~ ranlZe established and opqgted bv the
IJQ]iceor other law enforcement department
4 The discharReof fireanns inaJJ..Ijvate_belo~roundlevelbasement or cellar tarlZet ranRe.;
5. The dischame of firearms Jokill any d;:lIlgerous or destructive wild q,J1irnal;
6. The discl:!ame of firea~ to legal1y~uthanize any!,ick or wounqed animal:
7, The dischame of firearms ~arlYcduly authorized 120lice officer or law enforcement official
;li;Jin...,g in the prooer oerfonnance ofhisdlJtiei3~
8 The dischame oiflrearms v,ritbJ:>lank cartrigges in theil!Jjcal oerfol111<j.1Jces. soortiDg~yents.
Qr in t~_firinlZ oLsallltes at mililgry funeral~_9L.other militarY affairs.
~L.Jhe disch~rge offirearo1s.Jor th~.P.ll.rlJoseQflsil1inlZ deer pursuant ill V<-I.~ode S 2~J:-2l2,
Doland of at ka~tfl\leaCresthatis zone.d.EAc
BQ. Any person violating this section shall be liable for a penalty of not less than twenty-five
dollars ($25.00) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) for each such violation.
Gf;. For purposes of this section, "residential district" shall mean any district described as VR, R-l,
R-2, R-4, R-6, R-lO, R-15, ~MD, PUD or PRD on the official zoning map of the county.
3
Attachment B - Nov. 1, 2006 Executive Summary
Attachment A - Draft Ordinance: September 7,2006
(9-19-74; 6-10-81; Code 1988, S 13-9; Ord. 98-A(1), 8-5-98)
State law reference--For state law as to authority of county to adopt this section, see Va. Code ~ 15.2-1209.
Sec. 10-109 Standing or walking with loaded rifle or shotgun.
A. It shall be unlawful for any person to carry or have in his possession while on any part of a
public highway within the county a loaded rifle or shotgun when sU~~Q.!lj~J12t authorized to hunt on the
~J2fODertv on both sides ofthe_highw~y~LQng which he is standing or walking.
B. Any person violating this section shall be liable to a fine not to exceed one hundred dollars
(S100.00) for each such violation.
C. All law-enforcement officers authorized to act as such within the county shall have the power
to enforce this section, including but not limited to all duly appointed and acting game wardens.
D. Loaded rifle or shotgun as used in this section is defined as a rifle or shotgun with ammunition
within the action chamber, magazine or clip which is within or on the rifle or shotgun.
E. The provisions of this section shall not apply to persons carrying loaded firearms in moving
vehicles nor to persons acting at the time in defense of persons or property.
(3-11-81; Ord. of9-15-93; Code 1988, S 13-9.2; Ord. 98-A(1), 8-5-98)
State law reference--State law as to authority of county to adopt this section, Va. Code ~ 18.2 287 ~Jj_,~:jl09.1.
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy of an Ordinance duly
adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, by a vote of _ to _, as
recorded below, at a regular meeting held on .
Aye Nay
Mr. Boyd
Mr. Dorrier
Mr. Rooker
Mr. Slutzky
Ms. Thomas
Mr. Wyant
4
Attachment B - Nov. 1, 2006 Executive Summary
Attachment B - Va. Code 99 15.2-1209,15.2-1209.1
~ 15.2-1209. Prohibiting outdoor shooting of firearms or arrows from bows in certain areas.
Any county may prohibit the outdoor shooting of firearms or arrows from bows in any areas of the
county which are in the opinion of the governing body so heavily populated as to make such conduct
dangerous to the inhabitants thereof.
For purposes ofthis section, "bow" includes all compound bows, crossbows, longbows and recurve
bows having a peak draw weight of 10 pounds or more. The term "bow" does not include bows that have
a peak draw of less than 10 pounds or that are designed or intended to be used principally as toys. The
term "arrow" means a shaft-like projectile intended to be shot from a bow.
Any county that prohibits the outdoor shooting of firearms or arrows from bows shall provide an
exemption for the killing of deer pursuant to 9 29.1-522. Such exemption for the shooting of firearms
shall apply on land of at least five acres that is zoned for agricultural use. Such exemption for the
shooting of arrows from bows shall apply on land of at least two acres that is zoned for agricultural use.
(Code 1950,9 15-20.3; 1954, c. 223; 1962, c. 623, 9 15.1-518; 1968, c. 294; 1992, c. 600; 1993, c. 367;
1995,c.284; 1997,c. 587; 2000, c. 229; 2004, c. 930;2005,c. 564.)
~ 15.2-1209.1. Counties may regulate carrying of loaded firearms on public highways.
The governing body of any county is hereby empowered to adopt ordinances making it unlawful for any
person to carry or have in his possession while on any part of a public highway within such county a
loaded firearm when such person is not authorized to hunt on the private property on both sides of the
highway along which he is standing or walking; and to provide a penalty for violation of such ordinance
not to exceed a fine of $1 00. The provisions of this section shall not apply to persons carrying loaded
firearms in moving vehicles, or to persons acting at the time in defense of persons or property.
(Code 1950,918.1-272; 1975, cc. 14, 15,9 J8.2-287; 2004, c. 462.)
5
Attachment C
~ 29.1-527. Counties, cities or towns may prohibit hunting near public schools and county, city,
town or regional parks.
The governing body of any county, city or town may prohibit by ordinance, shooting or hunting with a
firearm, or prohibit hunters from traversing an area while in possession of a loaded firearm, within 100
yards of any property line of a public school or a county, city, town or regional park. The governing body
may, in such ordinance, provide that any violation thereof shall be a Class 4 misdemeanor. Nothing in
this section shall give any county, city or town the authority to enforce such an ordinance on lands within
a national or state park or forest, or wildlife management area.
(1985, c. 485,929-144.5:1; 1987, c. 488.)
Attachment D
~ 29.1-529. Killing of deer or bear damaging fruit trees, crops, livestock, or personal
property or creating a hazard to aircraft or motor vehicles.
A. Whenever deer or bear are damaging fruit trees, crops, livestock or personal property utilized
for commercial agricultural production in the Commonwealth, the owner or lessee of the lands
on which such damage is done shall immediately report the damage to the Director or his
designee for investigation. If after investigation the Director or his designee finds that deer or
bear are responsible for the damage, he shall authorize in writing the owner, lessee or any other
person designated by the Director or his designee to kill such deer or bear when they are found
upon the land upon which the damages occurred. However, the Director or his designee shall
have the option of authorizing the capture and relocation of such bear rather than authorizing the
killing of the bear, provided that the relocation occurs within a reasonable period of time; and
whenever deer cause damage on parcels of land of five acres or less, except when such acreage is
used for commercial agricultural production, the Director or his designee shall have discretion as
to whether to issue a written authorization to kill the deer. The Director or his designee may limit
such authorization by specifying in writing the number of animals to be killed and duration for
which the authorization is effective and may in proximity to residential areas and under other
appropriate circumstances limit or prohibit the authorization between 11 :00 p.m. and one-half
hour before sunrise of the following day. The Director or his designees issuing these
authorizations shall specify in writing that only antlerless deer shall be killed, unless the Director
or his designee determines that there is clear and convincing evidence that the damage was done
by deer with antlers. Deer or bear killed pursuant to such authorization shall be utilized or
disposed of within 24 hours of being killed. Any owner or lessee ofland who has been issued a
written authorization shall not be issued an authorization in subsequent years unless he can
demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Director or his designee that during the period following the
prior authorization, the owner or his designee has hunted bear or deer on the land for which he
received a previous authorization.
B. Subject to the provisions of subsection A, the Director or his designee may issue a written
authorization to kill deer causing damage to residential plants, whether ornamental,
noncommercial agricultural, or other types of residential plants. The Director may charge a fee
not to exceed actual costs. The holder of this written authorization shall be subject to local
ordinances, including those regulating the discharge of firearms.
C. Whenever deer are creating a hazard to the operation of any aircraft or to the facilities
connected with the operation of aircraft, the person or persons responsible for the safe operation
of the aircraft or facilities shall report such fact to the Director or his designee for investigation.
If after investigation the Director or his designee finds that deer are creating a hazard, he shall
authorize such person or persons or their representatives to kill the deer when they are found to
be creating such a hazard.
D. Whenever deer are creating a hazard to the operation of motor vehicle traffic within the
corporate limits of any city, the operator of a motor vehicle may report such fact to the Director
or his designee for investigation. If after investigation the Director or his designee finds that deer
are creating a hazard within such city, he may authorize responsible persons, or their
representatives, to kill the deer when they are found to be creating such a hazard. The carcass of
every deer or bear so killed may be awarded to the owner or lessee by the Director or his
Attachment D
designee, who shall give such person a certificate to that effect on forms furnished by the
Department. Any person awarded a deer or bear under this section may use the carcass as ifhe
had killed the animal during the hunting season for deer or bear.
E. Whenever deer are damaging property in a locality in which deer herd population reduction
has been recommended in the current Deer Management Plan adopted by the Board, the owner or
lessee of the lands on which such damage is being done may report such damage to the Director
or his designee for investigation. If after investigation the Director or his designee finds that deer
are responsible for the damage, he may authorize in writing the owner, lessee or any other person
designated by the Director or his designee to kill such deer when they are found upon the land
upon which the damages occurred. The Director or his designee also may limit such
authorization by specifying in writing the number of animals to be killed and the period of time
for which the authorization is effective. The carcass of every deer so killed may be awarded to
the owner or lessee by the Director or his designee, who shall give such person a certificate to
that effect on forms furnished by the Department. Any person awarded a deer under this section
may use the carcass as if he had killed the animal during the hunting season for deer. The
requirement in subsection A of this section, that an owner or lessee ofland demonstrate that
during the period following the prior authorization deer or bear have been hunted on his land,
shall not apply to any locality that conducts a deer population control program authorized by the
Department.
F. The Director or his designee may revoke or refuse to reissue any authorization granted under
this section when it has been shown by a preponderance of the evidence that an abuse of the
authorization has occurred. Such evidence may include a complaint filed by any person with the
Department alleging that an abuse of the written authorization has occurred. Any person
aggrieved by the issuance, denial or revocation of a written authorization can appeal the decision
to the Department of Game and Inland Fisheries. Any person convicted of violating any
provision of the hunting and trapping laws and regulations shall be entitled to receive written
authorization to kill deer or bear. However, such person shall not (i) be designated as a shooter
nor (ii) carry out the authorized activity for a person who has received such written authorization
for a period of at least two years and up to five years following his most recent conviction for
violating any provision of the hunting and trapping laws and regulations. In determining the
appropriate length of this restriction, the Director shall take into account the nature and severity
of the most recent violation and of any past violations of the hunting and trapping laws and
regulations by the applicant. No person shall be designated as a shooter under this section during
a period when such person's hunting license or privileges to hunt have been suspended or
revoked.
G. The Director or his designee may authorize, subject to the provisions of this section, the
killing of deer over bait within the political boundaries of any city or town in the Commonwealth
when requested by a certified letter from the governing body of such locality.
(Code 1950,929-145.1; 1954, c. 686; 1956, c. 684; 1958, cc. 315, 609; 1960, c. 129; 1962, c.
229; 1970, c. 79; 1980, c. 271; 1987, cc. 48, 488; 1991, c. 99; 1993, cc. 204, 273; 1994, c. 571;
1996, c. 314; 1998, c. 179; 1999, c. 563; 2000, c. 6; 2002, c. 174; 2003, cc. 123, 135; 2004, c.
447.)
2
Sheriff
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of the Sheriff'
Albemarle Count' Courthouse
Edgar S. Robb
Sheriff
41 () East High Street
Charlottesville. Virginia 22'102
December 13, 2006
Edgar S. Hohh
Sherif!
Tcle[lhone : 434-'J72-4IHII
Fax #: 434-'172-4(165
Mr. Dennis Rucker
Chairman, Albemarle Board
Of Supervisors
Remarks of Sheriff Edgar S. Robb at meeting ofBOS 12/13/06
Mr. Chairman, lady and gentlemen; members of the Albemarle County Board of
Supervisors.
I appear here today to state my position related to your study of the present firing
of firearms in Albemarle County. Please understand that I have no problem, in fact I feel
it is your duty and responsibility to review all County regulations and ordinances. If
there is no review there certainly will be no changes to meet changing times and
conditions.
I also am committed, as a former legislator and long time law enforcement officer
to the concept that we must deal with criminals and criminal behavior as we deal with the
crime. This approach is difficult, yet most effective. To change the law or make it more
restrictive than State law will simply increase the number of citizens treated as criminals
and increase the amount of time that law enforcers will be investigating complaints that
are very difficult to prove. These changes will be fine for the legal profession but not the
people we work for.
The present State code addresses adequately present criminal behavior related to
the reckless and criminal use of firearms in Albemarle County. To place Albemarle law
enforcers in a position of requiring them to use more discretion and therefore, more
inconsistent enforcement is not in the best interest of the citizens.
I would urge you to review present State code and realize that the present laws
meet the requirements of granting a good "quality of life"
It is with highest rega;ds I am,
~.\."
>-"
C
Edgar S. Robb
Sheriff
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Mountain Overlay District and Rural Areas Resource
Protection Work Session
AGENDA DATE:
December 13, 2006
ACTION:
x
INFORMATION:
SU BJ ECT IPROPOSAUREQU EST:
Protection of Albemarle's Rural Areas Resources
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
STAFF CONTACT(S):.
Tucker, Foley, Davis, Kamptner, Graham, Cilimberg,
Benish, McDowell
----'"
ATTACHMENTS:
Yes
/
I
REVIEWED BY:
I.
LEGAL REVIEW: Yes
BACKGROUND:
On September 13, 2006, the Board of Supervisors held a work session to discuss the Mountain Overlay District (MOD)
Committee's recommendations for a three-part program to "protect the economic, cultural, and natural resources of
Albemarle County's mountains." The Committee's report advised, "several aspects of the proposal, such as enhanced
protection for critical slopes, might be appropriate for general application in the County's Rural Areas." The Board directed
staff to investigate extending the protection measures recommended in the MOD framework to the rest of the Rural Areas
and to schedule a joint meeting with the Planning Commission to review this report. A copy of the proposed MOD
framework is attached as reference (Attachment A). The Board did not vote on the Mountain Overlay District Resolution of
Intent.
STRATEGIC PLAN:
Goal 2: Protect the County's natural resources.
DISCUSSION:
The Proposal for Protection of Albemarle County's Mountain Resources recommended by the MOD Committee consists of
what the Committee referred to as a "three-legged stool." This three-part program includes: a) a mountain ordinance
framework that focuses on protection of the MOD environment; b) principles that would mandate and govern Rural Cluster
Subdivisions; and (c) public acquisition of interests in land. The Committee stressed that all three "legs" would provide the
comprehensive approach needed for protecting the lands in the Mountain Overlay District (Attachment A).
As the Board requested, this work session is to review an assessment of applying the MOD recommendations throughout
the Rural Areas. Staff's analysis of applying the MOD recommendations throughout the Rural Areas is available in
Attachment B. The format for this review includes the actual MOD framework quoted from the individual components,
applicable comprehensive plan policies, existing ordinance regulations, and a question/answer segment to discuss some of
the issues.
BUDGET IMPACT:
When the Board has determined the direction regarding each of these regulations, staff will prepare a budget impact
analysis. It is anticipated that additional staff resources would be required to process, inspect, and enforce many of
these additional regulations. If the Board elects to do so, those additional costs may be recovered in permit fees.
Additionally, it is anticipated that providing accurate surveys and detailed plans, as well as any additional permit fees,
would increase upfront costs to builders. It is anticipated that all of the builder's costs would be passed on to the
future homebuyers. While economic theory suggests these increased costs would constrain development activity in
the Rural Areas, staff cannot speculate on whether the additional costs would have an appreciable effect on the rate of
Rural Areas development.
BoS report 12 13 06 work session .doc
Page 1 of 9
AGENDA TITLE:
Mountain Overlay District and Rural Areas Resource Protection Work Session
December 13, 2006
Page 2
RECOMMENDATIONS:
The purpose of this work session is to provide an opportunity for the Board and Planning Commission to give staff
direction. Based on direction given at this work session, staff would develop both a Resolution of Intent and
ordinance amendments to comply with the Board's direction. To be able to proceed with that effort, staff needs
answers to the following questions:
1. Does the Board wish to proceed with any of the MOD Committee recommendations (Attachment B -
Part A) and, if so, does the Board wish to limit all of these to a Mountain Overlay District or to expand
this to include the entire Rural Areas? If the changes were applied to all Rural Areas property in the
same manner, the need to create a Mountain Overlay District is eliminated while creation of the district
would be important if any provisions were to be limited to that district.
2. If the Board decides to proceed with any of the proposed changes, which changes would they like
brought forward? To assist the Board, the following list describes the possible changes discussed and
provides staff's position.
a. Critical Slopes. Staff believes applying the critical slopes provision over the entire Rural Areas
would be effective at reducing development impacts and protecting natural resources. Staff
believes this would provide some, but not all, of the natural resource protection anticipated with the
previously considered subdivision phasing and clustering provisions. Staff believes limiting this
provision to the MOD would also provide a benefit, but a much smaller one and would increase the
complexity of plan reviews by creating two separate standards rather than simplifying with one
standard. It should be recognized that this provision can reduce the ability of some properties to
exercise all of their development rights, but would provide for at least one dwelling on the property
as it currently exists. If applied to the entire Rural Areas rather than the MOD, the number of
properties potentially affected would significantly increase.
b. Erosion and Sediment Control Plan. Staff believes there is not sufficient benefit for reducing the
disturbance area to 2,500 square feet for all building permits, as building permits for new Rural
Areas' dwellings all fall within the current 10,000 square foot area threshold. Reducing the area to
2,500 square feet would expand coverage to construction such as additions to houses and
garages, which staff considers to have much smaller impacts. If there is interest in pursuing the
critical slopes provisions and/or verifying safe access, staff will need to stop allowing use of
Agreements in-lieu of a Plan and require complete E&S Plans, which include existing topography
and all proposed grading. Ending use of Agreements in-lieu of a Plan does not require any
ordinance changes but will significantly increase the amount of work staff must do in both permit
review and inspections. It would also increase the cost to applicants for building permits in the
Rural Areas.
c. Stream Buffers. Staff has previously indicated a 200' buffer width can be justified in the MOD,
based on the increased sensitivity of those areas. Staff does not believe water resource protection
can justify a 200' stream buffer for the entire Rural Areas. Staff believes including stream buffers
for intermittent streams throughout the Rural Areas, as is currently done in the Water Supply Areas,
is a justifiable protection of natural resources and consistent with the County's Strategic Plan Goal
for enhanced protection of water resources. Including intermittent streams throughout the entire
Rural Areas would potentially impact the ability of property owners to exercise all of their
development rights, but provisions already in the Water Protection Ordinance allow at least some
reasonable use of the property.
d. Building Heights. Staff believes protection of ridges and crests provides benefit within the MOD, but
there is little benefit in applying this to the entire Rural Areas. Within the MOD, it should be noted
that the benefit of limiting building height with respect to the ridgeline has been challenged as
having unanticipated impacts, such as encouraging building on the slope near the ridge, which
potentially increases both the natural resource impact and visibility. Staff does not believe that
BoS report 12 13 06 work session.doc
Page 2 of 9
AGENDA TITLE:
Mountain Overlay District and Rural Areas Resource Protection Work Session
December 13, 2006
Page 3
application of building height restrictions in relation to ridgelines should be applied to the remainder
of the Rural Areas.
e. Safe Access. Staff believes this provision is already in the Zoning Ordinance, but the ordinance is
not specific on what is required and difficult to enforce without seeing grading that demonstrates the
requirement is being satisfied. As discussed with E&S Plans, assuring compliance with this
provision would require the County to stop allowing Agreements in-lieu of a Plan for new dwellings
in the Rural Areas. It should also be noted the Fire/Rescue Department has indicated that safe
access is an issue throughout the County. Based on this, staff believes this must be uniformly
applied across the entire Rural Areas.
f. Waivers and Modifications. Waivers, modifications or variances are available in the Zoning
Ordinance. The MOD framework provides clarification of the intent and offers administrative
waivers, under certain conditions. To simplify process and assure consistent application, staff
believes waivers and modifications should be kept administrative whenever possible and limited to
that needed to allow at least some reasonable use of the property.
g. Guidelines for Cluster Subdivision Ordinance. The existing regulations apply to both the MOD and
the Rural Areas. Staff does not believe that the existing ordinance needs modification.
h. Additional Protection for Mountain Resources. Staff believes additional protection measures for the
Rural Areas can be explored, but completion of the current efforts should take priority over starting
any new effort.
ATTACHMENTS
A-Proposal for Protection of Albemarle County's Mountain Resources
B- Staff analysis of applying the MOD recommendations throughout the Rural Areas
C-Discussion Points - ExpandinQ the proposed MOD Stream Buffer provisions Countywide
D-Zoninq Ordinance Sections 4.2.5 Waivers and 4.2.6 Exemptions
06.182
80S report 12 13 06 work session .doc
Page 3 of 9
Attachment A
Proposal for Protection of Albemarle County's Mountain Resources - April!?, 2006 SLBMITTED.doe
Proposal for Protection of Albemarle County's Mountain Resources
by
The Mountain Overlay District (MOD) Committee
On June 4, 2003, the Board of Supervisors appointed a Mountain Overlay District Committee.
The Board asked the Committee to craft "an acceptable and effective ordinance to protect
mountain resources and implement the Mountain Protection Plan" (a section of the
Comprehensive Plan adopted in 1998).1 The Committee's diverse membership was also asked
to use a consensus process.2 The Committee worked for two years, from April 2004 through
April 2006. AI/12 of the Committee's members support this proposal. 3
The Mountain Overlay District (MOD) Committee recommends a three-part program to protect the
economic, cultural, and natural resources of Albemarle County's mountains. The recommended
program includes: a mountain ordinance focused on protecting the MOD environment; principles
that would mandate and govern Rural Cluster Subdivisions in the mountains; and public
acquisition of interests in land. Each of these elements is outlined below.
The program, as a whole, is designed to get development off critical slopes and out of stream
buffer areas and to protect habitats and watersheds, scenic and historic resources, and
agricultural and forestal uses of the mountains. It is also designed to conserve properties and
their values both within and outside the MOD. Several aspects of this proposal, such as
enhanced protection for critical slopes, might also be appropriate for general application in the
County's Rural Areas. Because the Committee's charge related to the MOD, however, we have
not included broader applications in our proposal.
A. Outline of a Mountain Overlay District Ordinance
1. Findings
a. Ensuring public safety is of particular concern in Albemarle's mountains. In a few clearly
defined areas, unstable mountain slopes are a clear threat to life and property, as
evidenced by past debris flows. More generally, difficult access can make successful fire
and rescue operations problematic in the mountains.
b. The mountains of the County are almost entirely in forest cover with the remaining acres
in orchards and pasture. They support a viable forest and agricultural industry that is
important to the County's economic well-being. Mountain areas provide critical services
in collecting, storing, filtering and releasing water for human consumption and other uses
at lower elevations. Maintaining forest cover and protecting headwaters and stream
buffers in the mountains are necessary for adequate quantity and quality of water. The
mountain forests (like all forests) also protect air quality and help stabilize climate.
c. Mountain landowners have important interests in maintaining the use, enjoyment and
economic value of their land. Landowners, businesses and citizens throughout the
County have important economic and quality-of-life interests in preserving the natural,
historic and scenic qualities of the mountains. These economic interests include a
substantial tourism industry.
d. Mountain areas are a system of slopes that extend for greater distances and may be
considerably steeper than slopes at lower elevations. Disturbance of steep slopes in
these areas is of particular concern because of the presence of more erodible soils than
in other areas and the length of the grade on such slopes.
I "Mountain Overlay District" memorandum from Joan McDowell to the Mountain Overlay District
Committee, March 16,2004.
2 Ibid. and "Mountain Overlay District Committee Meeting Notes," AprilS, 2004.
3 A 13th member, Katie Hobbs, moved to Georgia in latc 2005.
ATTACHMENT A
Page I of 5 Pages
Proposal for Protection of Albemarle COllnty's MOllntain Resources - April 17, 2006 SliBl\lITTED.doc
e. The mountain areas support native biological diversity and offer prime habitat for hunting
and wildlife observation. Declines in diversity are threatened by fragmentation of habitat
- the dividing of large areas into smaller parcels - and the resulting disruption of forest
cover.
f. The mountains provide an important and unique aesthetic and cultural resource. The
relatively pristine, wooded character of the County's high elevations - the blue backdrop
of the mountains - defines much of the character of Albemarle County and has served as
an inspiration and cultural landmark for residents since colonial times.
2. Purposes of Ordinance
Based on these findings, the Committee proposes an ordinance to achieve the following
purposes in mountain areas:
a. Protect public safety
b. Protect headwater streams, water quantity and quality, and public drinking water
reservoir capacity
c. Reduce impacts of development on native biological diversity (natural heritage)
d. Preserve properties and their values both within and outside the MOD
e. Protect agricultural and forestal soils and uses
f. Protect scenic qualities and cultural and other historical resources
3. Definitions
a. Mountain Ordinance District (MOD). The ordinance would use the same lower
boundary lines for the MOD as the proposed 1998 ordinance. It would apply to parcels
that lie wholly or partially within those boundary lines.
b. Ridge Area. A "ridge area" within the MOD would be defined as within 100 vertical feet
or 250 horizontal feet of a crest, whichever is more restrictive.4
4. Terms of the MOD Ordinance
a. Critical Slopes
No residential construction or related road or driveway construction, except for the improvement
of a road or driveway that existed on the date of the ordinance, would be permitted on critical
slopes. This ban on construction would not apply to roads built for forestry, agricultural, and
horticultural purposes.5 Neither would this ban apply to lots of record created on or before
December 10, 1980, in order to establish the first single family residence, provided there is no
alternative building site and no alternative route for the road.
Any roads built on critical slopes for forestry, agricultural, or horticultural purposes after the date
of the ordinance would not be convertible to residential use after the date of the ordinance. This
limitation would not apply to lots of record created on or before December 10, 1980, in order to
establish the first single family residence, provided there is no alternative building site and no
alternative route for the road.
b. Erosion and Sediment Control Plan
4 Virginia Code S 15.2-2295.1 defines "crest" to mean "the uppermost line of a mountain or chain of
mountains from which the land falls away on at least two sides to a lower elevation or elevations."
5 See Albemarle County Code S 18-4.2.1 (definition of "building site").
ATTACHMENT A
Page 2 of 5 Pages
Proposal for Protection of Albemarle County's Mountain Resonrces ~ Aprill?, 2006 SLBMlTTED.doc
Land disturbing activities exceeding 2500 square feet will require an effective erosion and
sediment control plan explicitly designed to address erosion control and water infiltration for the
long term. Guidelines for drafting these plans should encourage flexible and innovative
approaches.
c. Stream Buffers
No residential construction would be permitted within 200 feet of an intermittent or perennial
stream or river or other body of water shown on a U.S. Geological Survey 7.5 minute quadrangle
topographic map. No hard-surface or impermeable surface roads, including gravel on compacted
base, or driveways would be permitted in this area except by special use permit.
When disturbance is necessary to cross streams to access a portion of the property as set forth
above (or as otherwise allowed in the MOD), best management practices would be imposed.
Development in a stream buffer mal be authorized in the following circumstances, provided that
a mitigation plan 7 is submitted to, and approved, by the program authority:
. On a lot on which the development in the stream buffer will consist of the construction
and maintenance of a driveway or roadway, and the program authority determines that
the stream buffer would prohibit reasonable access to a portion of the lot which is
necessary for the owner to have a reasonable use of the lot; or
. On a lot of record created on or before December 10, 1980, if the stream buffer would
result in the loss of a building site, and there are no other available building sites outside
the stream buffer on the lot, or to allow redevelopment as permitted in the underlying
zoning district.8
d. Heiqht Restrictions
No building within the ridge area would be permitted to exceed 35 feet in height or to exceed the
height of an adjacent crest, whichever is more restrictive.9
e. Safe Access
Building sites within the MOD will not be approved unless the applicant can demonstrate that fire
and rescue vehicles will be able to safely access the site.
f. Waiver or Modification
An administrative waiver or modification from one or more of these requirements would be
available. Such waiver or modification could be granted only upon a finding that alternatives
proposed by the developer would advance each of the purposes of the ordinance to an equivalent
or greater degree than strict application of these requirements.lO In making this determination,
the appropriate body-the Program Authority or the Planning Commission-would take into
account the effects of the developer's overall plan for the property (including residential
construction and related road or driveway construction or road or driveway improvement), and if a
6 Albemarl,~ County Code 9 17-321 provides that the activities "may" be authorized by the program
authority, but the authority does not have to permit the activities in all cases.
7 The mitigation plan mandated by Albemarle County Code ~ 17-322(C)(2) requires, among other things,
that the activity be located so that it is the least dislUptive to the functions of the stream buffer.
8 See Albemarle County Code ~ 17-321.
9 It is the Committee's intention that "adjacent" refers to a crest on which a residential dwelling could be
constlUcted.
10 Compare with Albemarle County Code ~~ 18-4.2.5 and 18-5.1(a).
A TT ACHMENT A
Page 3 of 5 Pages
Proposal for Protection of Albemarle County's Mountain Resources - April 17, 2006 SlIBMITTED.doc
waiver were issued, it would include any conditions on development necessary to protect the
purposes of the ordinance.
A variance would be available in cases of undue hardship under existing regulations.11
Application of the Ordinance may result in inability to use all division rights 12 that have been
allocated to properties in the MOD - that is, because of measures in the Ordinance, parcels may
not be able to be developed as extensively as they would without these measures. Property
owners would have the ability to moderate the effect of these measures through waivers and
modifications.
B. Guidelines for Incorporation into a Future Rural Cluster Subdivision Ordinance for the
MOD
For Rural Preservation Developments (RPDs) in the MOD, rural preservation parcels (RPPs) will
include any ridge area in the RPD or as much of it as feasible consistent with utilization of all
development rights otherwise available to the parcel. The RPP will retain a development right.
The RPP will be configured and conditioned to minimize adverse impacts on hydrology,
biodiversity, aesthetics, cultural and other historical resources, agricultural and forestal soils and
uses, public safety, and to preserve property values within and outside the MOD.
Development lots outside the RPP will be configured and conditioned to minimize impacts on
these same resources and property values.13
Construction in RPDs in the MOD will also be subject to the generic requirements in the MOD
Ordinance, as above.
C. Additional Protection for Mountain Resources
The County's Comprehensive Plan makes specific provision for acquisition of property interests,
such as purchase of development rights (PDR), to protect the mountains. The Committee
proposes expanded efforts within the MOD to:
. Promote conservation easements
. Promote riparian buffer easements
· Encourage voluntary reduction of development potential
More specifically, beyond the ordinance and clustering proposed in this document, the Committee
believes the Board of Supervisors must develop innovative and flexible approaches to protecting
Albemarle's mountains. It has generated the following list of ideas, although it is not endorsing
any single one. The list is certainly not intended to be exhaustive; rather, the Committee
encourages the Board to think creatively.
. Grant complete or partial tax-exemption to any real estate placed in a permanent
"riparian buffer" easement, even if the landowner chooses to impose stream buffers that
are wider than those recommended in the Stream Buffers section of this proposal.14
] 1 See Albemarle County Code ~ 18-34.2.
12 The term "division rights" includes "development rights."
13 See Mountain Design Standards, Natural Resources and Cultural Assets Plan, which is a component of
the Albemarle County Comprehensive Plan, pp. 116-117; Strategies, Rural Areas Plan, which is a
component of the Albemarle County Comprehensive Plan, pp. 37-38; and Memorandum to Planning
Commission from Stephen P. Waller (May 24,2005) (Ragged Mountain Farm RPD).
ATTACHMENT A
Page 4 of 5 Pages
Proposal for Protection of Albemarle County's "Iountllin Resources - April 17, 2006 SUBMITTED.doc
. Change the ACE Program's criteria to evaluate properties and allocate the currently
available and potentially new funding resources as follows:
o Mountain value: Modify the ACE ranking to add a category for land located
inside the MOD.
o Scenic value: Modify the ACE ranking to add a category for scenic lands.
. Lease scenic rights. Develop a Scenic Land-Lease Program that would pay a fair price
to landowners for very long (30-99 years) scenic leases on the highest ridge spines.
. Develop a Watershed Protection Fund. Work with the Rivanna Water and Sewer
Authority and the Albemarle County Service Authority to develop a user fee that would be
earmarked-as supplemental ACE funding-for the MOD sections of the watershed that
feed the local public water supply system.
. Abate all property taxes on the Ridge Areas within the MOD as long as they remain
undeveloped. If conversion occurs later, a rollback of all abated taxes would be levied,
with interest at 10% on accrued rollback balances compounded annually.
. Develop a transfer of development rights (TOR) ordinance (using recent enabling
legislation) whereby development rights within the MOD may be sold and transferred to
parcels wholly outside the MOD.15
Enactment of one or more of these approaches would not be designed to compensate
landowners for the impact of the proposed ordinance. Instead, they would create additional
protections for the MOD beyond what may be accomplished by regulation.
It is the Committee's desire to avoid adverse impacts on the viability of the ACE program as well
as on any other similar program or regulatory provision in the County.
14 ~ 58.1-3666. Wetlands and riparian buffers. Wetlands, as defined herein, that are subject to a perpetual
easement permitting inundation by water, and riparian buffers, as defined herein, that are subject to a
perpetual easement permitting inundation by water, are hereby declared to be a separate class of property
and shall constitute a classification for local taxation separate from other classifications of real property.
The governing body of any county, city or town may, by ordinance, exempt or partially exempt such
property from local taxation. "Riparian buffer" means an area of trees, shrubs or other vegetation, subject
to a perpetual easement permitting inundation by water, that is (i) at least thirty-five feet in width, (ii)
adjacent to a body of water, and (iii) managed to maintain the integrity of stream channels and shorelines
and reduce the effects of upland sources of pollution by trapping, filtering, and converting sediments,
nutrients, and other chemicals. "Wetlands" means an area that is inundated or saturated by surface or
ground water at a frequency or duration sufTicient to support, and that under normal conditions does
support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions, and that is subject
to a perpetual easement permitting inundation by water. (1998, c. 516.)
15 Approved by the Governor-Chapter 573 (effective 7/1/06). Transfer of development rights. Allows
localities to provide for the transfer of development rights from a parcel of property located in the locality
to another parcel of property located elsewhere in the locality.
ATTACHMENT A
Page 5 of 5 Pages
Attachment B
Part A (Terms of the MOD Ordinance)
1. Critical Slopes
MOD: "No residential construction or related road or driveway construction, except for the improvement of a road or
driveway that existed on the date of the ordinance, would be permitted on critical slopes. This ban on construction would
not apply to roads built for forestry, agricultural, and horticultural purposes. Neither would this ban apply to lots of record
created on or before December 10, 1980, in order to establish the first single family residence, provided there is no
alternative building site and no alternative route for the road.
Any roads built on critical slopes for forestry, agricultural, or horticultural purposes after the date of the ordinance would not
be convertible to residential use after the date of the ordinance. This limitation would not apply to lots of record created on
or before December 10, 1980, in order to establish the first single family residence, provided there is no alternative building
site and no alternative route for the road."
Comprehensive Plan: The Plan recognizes the importance of protection of critical slopes" in order to maintain the existing
balance between slope, soils, geology, and vegetation." Most of the slopes defined as critical (25%) or greater can be
found in the mountains. The Mountain Overlay District "Mountain Design Standards" includes the following general
standards that should be applied to protect mountain resources:
· Locate driveways to minimize grading, length, and impact on critical slopes and trees. Driveways should
disturb no more than 65 feet in cross section.
· Locate the house and structures to make them safe.
· Minimize disturbances to critical slopes.
· Design private driveways to permit fire and rescue emergency vehicle access:
· Longitudinal gradient should not exceed 16%.
· Minimum allowable radius for horizontal curvature should be 40 feet.
Existinq Requlations: Zoning Ordinance Section 4.2 recognizes that protection of slopes 25% or greater is important in
order to protect hillsides from impacts such as soil erosion, debris flows, sedimentation, and protection of public drinking
water supplies. Waivers and modifications are available under Section 4.2.5 (Attachment C) where unusual physical
conditions of the parcel (such as topography) would effectively prohibit or unreasonably restrict the use of the property, or
where other specified findings can be made. Section 4.2.6 provides that exceptions for lots or structures may be available
for structures in existence and parcels of record established on or before December 10, 1980, and for accessways, public
utility lines, stormwater management facilities and other public facilities (Attachment C). Enforcement of critical slopes
regulations is impeded under the County's current requirements. Since topographic information is not shown on final
subdivision plats or on building plans, building permits are issued without taking critical slopes into consideration.
Construction work has begun (foundations excavated, etc.) prior to the initial building inspection.
What are the differences between the MOO proposal and existing regulations?
The primary difference is that roads and driveways are permitted on critical slopes under the existing ordinance, if no
reasonable alternative exists. The proposed MOD regulation would prevent new roads for residential uses (constructed
after the adoption of the MOD ordinance) from being constructed on critical slopes. New roads built for forestry,
agricultural, and horticultural purposes could not be converted for residential uses. Secondarily, modifications and waivers
to Section 4.2 require an action by the Planning Commission, and the MOD regulations would allow modifications and
waivers to be approved administratively.
How would expanding the MOO recommendation impact the Rural Areas?
According to the Comprehensive Plan, 22% of the County acreage consists of critical slopes, which are located throughout
the County. The greatest concentrations of critical slopes are located in mountainous areas adjacent to the Shenandoah
National Park, both sides of Route 29 south, and east of Route 20 from Carter's Bridge to the Orange County line, but
random areas are located throughout the County.
· The number of lots that could be affected by additional regulations to prevent new roads and driveways from crossing
critical slopes is unknown. It is likely that some lots would lose their full building potential, without approval of a
waiver.
· The siting of driveways on parcels to avoid critical slopes will reduce accessibility to potential building sites, thus
reducing the potential number of building sites that can be utilized on some parcels
BoS report 12 13 06 work session.doc
Page 4 of 9
· There can be a reduced impact of erosion and sedimentation and reduced stormwater runoff from driveways across
critical slopes, but could result in longer driveways with higher impacts.
What changes would be needed to implement this measure?
1. Ordinance changes would be required.
2. Currently, preliminary subdivision plats show that a building site, exclusive of critical slopes, is possible on the
parcel. The final subdivision plat and the subsequent building plans do not depict critical slopes and the building
site locations can be changed from what was shown on the preliminary plats, thereby impeding any enforcement of
critical slope regulations. Plans identifying building sites, roads and driveways, as well as critical slopes prior to
issuance of Erosion and Sediment Control Permits and prior to issuance of building permits, would assure that
building, roads and driveways would not be constructed on critical slopes. This change would be the responsibility
of the applicant at some additional cost.
3. Accurate topographic surveys are needed to ascertain existing road locations or aerials showing
agricultural/forestal/horticultural roads that exist at the time an ordinance. New County aerials are scheduled to be
flown in March of 2007 as part of a statewide GIS project. Detailed information from that survey will not be
available until the following year. The existing agricultural/forestal/horticultural roads are not always visible on
aerials that were flown in 2000.
4. Review times would remain the same.
What would be the benefit to the County?
The benefits for not disturbing critical slopes have been established by the Comprehensive Plan. Although critical slopes
are more abundant in the MOD, they can be found in other locations throughout the County. Larger parcels in the Rural
Areas would have more opportunity to provide alternative routes for roads and driveways that do not disturb critical slopes.
2. Erosion and Sediment Control Plan
MOD: "Land disturbing activities exceeding 2,500 square feet will require an effective erosion and sediment control plan
explicitly designed to address erosion control and water infiltration for the long term. Guidelines for drafting these plans
should encourage flexible and innovative approaches."
Comprehensive Plan: The Plan recognizes the importance of protecting both soil and water for the continued vitality of the
forestal and agricultural community, as well as protection of the water supply and the Chesapeake Bay watershed.
Existinq Requlations: Section 17-104.24(a) and (b) of the Water Protection Ordinance provides that the disturbance of
2,500 square feet or more within the Mountain Overlay District, and 10,000 or more square feet outside the MOD, are
defined to be "a land disturbing activity" and subject to the provisions of the ordinance. Land disturbing activities must have
either an Erosion and Sediment Control (E&S) Plan or an Agreement in-lieu of a Plan (a narrative agreement instead of a
formal Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (Section 17-104 and Section 17-205). E & S Plans are intended to address
erosion and sediment control during construction, but also provide topographic information that is not available with an
Agreement in-lieu of a Plan. Additionally, storm water management plans are required for new subdivisions, but are not
required for building permits. Stormwater management is a permanent measure to control the post construction impact of
a land disturbing activity. Section 17 -200A (4) provides that if a road has been constructed under an agricultural
exemption and an application, such as a special use permit or subdivision, has been requested within two years of the
exemption, an E & S Plan will be required. However, if construction is complete an E & S Plan will not be required.
What are the differences between the MOD proposal and existing regulations?
If a Mountain Overlay District is established, the existing regulations to require an E & S Plan for disturbances of 2,500
square feet are in place. An Agreement in-lieu of a Plan rather than a complete E & S Plan is currently required with single
family building permits for disturbances of 10,000 or more square feet inside and outside of the MOD. Typically, a new
house in the Rural Areas requires a disturbance of at least 10,000 square feet. Thus, the 2,500 square foot threshold is
intended to capture other development activities (e.g., large additions or garages) rather than new houses.
How would expanding the MOD recommendation impact the Rural Areas?
As the typical new single family dwelling in the Rural Areas results in more than 10,000 square feet of land disturbance, the
change from an Agreement in-lieu of a Plan to a required E & S Plan has a large effect. It is believed that room additions,
garages, and similar construction activities would involve 2,500 square feet of disturbance. As the MOD contains an
environment that is more sensitive to land disturbing impacts, the 2,500 square feet is believed to be warranted. The
environmental benefits in the remainder of the Rural Areas for the more restrictive regulations would be limited, if they
should be applied to the remainder of the Rural Areas. An undetermined cost to the applicants would result from the more
restrictive requirements.
BoS report 121306 work session.doc
Page 5 of 9
What changes would be needed to implement this measure?
1. Ordinance changes would be required to implement a 2,500 square foot threshold for E&S plans.
2. Additional staff would be necessary to review the plans, as well as to inspect and verify construction matched
approved plans.
What would be the benefit to the County?
There would be some small environmental benefit if the disturbed area requirement for a permit was reduced to 2,500
square feet and this was applied throughout the Rural Areas. The extent of the benefit cannot be quantified, as the
amount of future disturbances is unknown. However, according to the County's engineering, additional staff and review
time would be required and it was not believed that the benefits from reducing the disturbance threshold to 2,500 square
feet would outweigh the costs. If there is an interest in preventing driveways or roads to be constructed on critical slopes, it
will be necessary to stop allowing Agreements in-lieu of a Plan and require complete E & S Plans so that compliance can
be verified in advance of a permit. That requirement would increase the cost to applicants.
3. Stream Buffers
MOD: "No residential construction would be permitted within 200 feet of an intermittent or perennial stream or river or other
body of water shown on a U.S. Geological Survey 7.5 minute quadrangle topographic map. No hard-surface or
impermeable surface roads, including gravel on compacted base, or driveways would be permitted in this area except by
special use permit.
When disturbance is necessary to cross streams to access a portion of the property as set forth above (or as otherwise
allowed in the MOD), best management practices would be imposed.
Development in a stream buffer may be authorized in the following circumstances, provided that a mitigation plan is
submitted to, and approved, by the program authority:
· On a lot on which the development in the stream buffer will consist of the construction and maintenance of a
driveway or roadway, and the program authority determines that the stream buffer would prohibit reasonable
access to a portion of the lot which is necessary for the owner to have a reasonable use of the lot; or
· On a lot of record created on or before December 10, 1980, if the stream buffer would result in the loss of a
building site, and there are no other available building sites outside the stream buffer on the lot, or to allow
redevelopment as permitted in the underlying zoning district."
Comprehensive Plan: The importance of protecting the County's water resources is extensively documented in the Natural
Resources chapter of the Plan. In 1991, the County became the first (and only) non-Tidewater locality in Virginia to
voluntarily adopt a local Chesapeake Bay protection ordinance. The functions of stream buffers on the local and regional
environment are also well documented in the Plan.
Existinq Requlations: Sections 17-317 through 17-322 of the Water Protection Ordinance provide stream buffer
regulations. Intermittent and perennial streams require a 100' wide buffer (200' wide total) in the Water Supply Protection
Areas. In the remainder of the County only perennial streams require a buffer and the width of the buffer varies depending
on the streams' location and the abutting land uses.
What are the differences between the MOD proposal and existing regulations?
The MOD would expand the buffer for both perennial and intermittent streams to 200' (400' total). The Water Protection
Manager has provided an analysis of the discussion points pertaining to the expansion of the MOD stream buffer
provisions into the remainder of the Rural Areas (Attachment B).
How would expanding the MOD recommendation impact the Rural Areas?
The greatest benefit would be to provide a wider corridor for wildlife and additional storage for floodwaters. It is unknown
how many parcels would be impacted from this additional buffer.
What changes would be needed to implement this measure?
1. Ordinance changes would be required
2. Additional staff resources to administer and inspect
What would be the benefit to the County?
Staff believes that an increased buffer width would provide some benefit, but it would be difficult to justify this benefit
outside of the MOD. Staff believes that applying a 100' buffer requirement for both perennial and intermittent streams
BoS report 12 13 06 work session.doc
Page 6 of 9
throughout the entire Rural Areas could be justified and would provide a significant benefit to water resources, as well as
providing uniform treatment of all Rural Areas property.
4. HeiQht Restrictions
MOD: "No building within the ridge area would be permitted to exceed 35 feet in height or to exceed the height of an
adjacent crest, whichever is more restrictive."
Comprehensive Plan: The Mountain Overlay District "Mountain Design Standards" include the following standards that
should be applied in the District:
· Locate the house and structures to make them unobtrusive in the landscape.
· Do not build structures taller than the natural tree canopy.
· Do not locate the house and structures where they will be "skylighted" against the horizon.
· Do not alter the continuity of the ridgeline.
Existinq Requlations: Section 10.4 limits the maximum height for structures in the Rural Areas to 35 feet.
What are the differences between the MOD proposal and existing regulations?
The maximum MOD height would not exceed 35 feet or exceed the height of the adjacent crest. The RA regulations do not
measure heights in relation to adjacent crests.
What would be the benefit to the County?
Although crests along ridges outside the MOD are located throughout the County, the benefit derived from restricting
heights for buildings outside the MOD would be minimal.
How would expanding the MOD recommendation impact the Rural Areas?
The Virginia Code defines "crest" to mean "the uppermost line of a mountain or chain of mountains from which the land
falls away on at least two sides to a lower elevation or elevations." Limiting building construction on all crests and ridges
could reduce building on an unknown number of parcels in the Rural Areas.
What changes would be needed to implement this measure?
1. Ordinance changes would be required
2. Staff time to verify and enforce
3. Applicant costs to survey land and submit topography with l' contour intervals.
5. Safe Access
MOD: "Building sites within the MOD will not be approved unless the applicant can demonstrate that fire and rescue
vehicles will be able to safely access the site."
Comprehensive Plan: The Community Facilities Fire and Rescue section of the Plan contains a service objective for
achieving a fire and rescue response time of thirteen minutes or less in the Rural Areas. The Mountain Overlay District
"Mountain Design Standards" includes the following general standards that should be applied to protect mountain
resources:
· Locate the house and structures to make them safe.
· Minimize disturbances to critical slopes.
· Design private driveways to permit fire and rescue emergency vehicle access:
· Longitudinal gradient should not exceed 16%.
· Minimum allowable radius for horizontal curvature should be 40 feet.
· Avoid north slopes where snow and ice may accumulate.
Existinq Requlations: Currently, the County requires that building sites for single family residences, as specified in Section
4.2 of the Zoning Ordinance, be shown on preliminary subdivision plans, primarily as a verification that a lot is not being
created that cannot support a residence under existing regulations. The County does not require that the building site
appear on any other plan and final locations of residences can be changed after the preliminary subdivision is approved.
Section 31.2.3.1 of the Zoning Ordinance does require safe and convenient access be provided prior to issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy, but there is no requirement to provide a grading plan that would demonstrate this prior to
issuance of a building permit. There is a requirement that an E&S Plan be approved prior to issuance of a building permit
when the land disturbance exceeds the 10,000 square foot threshold. All building permits for new homes in the Rural
Areas fall within those criteria once the disturbance for the house, driveway, well, and septic field are included. If
BoS report 121306 work session.doc
Page 7 of 9
Agreements in-lieu of a Plan are used, there is no plan that shows existing and proposed grading and compliance cannot
be verified prior to issuance of the building permit. If E&S Plans, rather than Agreements in-lieu of a Plan, are required for
all building permits for new homes, the E&S Plans would include both existing and proposed grading, which allows the safe
and convenient access to be verified prior to issuance of the building permit, as well as avoidance of critical slopes if that
provision is used for driveways.
What are the differences between the MOO proposal and existing regulations?
The MOD proposal would require that access to all new building sites in the MOD be constructed to standards that provide
safe and access by emergency vehicles. The County's existing regulations do not contain measures by which safe and
convenient access to single family dwellings can be required.
How would expanding the MOO recommendation impact the Rural Areas?
Requiring measures to assure that every residential dwelling provide a safe and convenient access for emergency vehicles
would further the level of protection sought for lives and property. As the location, constraints, and number of future lots
are unknown, the full impact of expanding this requirement into the remaining Rural Areas cannot be determined. However,
it is believed that it would be less than the MOD due to more level terrain. Conversion or dual use of existing roads used for
agricultural, horticultural or forestry purposes may require upgrades. These upgrades may also require land disturbance,
thus triggering an E & S Plan. Additional costs for plans and road construction can be anticipated.
What changes would need to be implemented?
1. Ordinance revisions and County application process changes would be required.
2. Additional staff time would be needed for review of Erosion Control Plans for all Rural Areas' building permits and
inspections to verify construction matches what is shown on the approved plan.
6. Waiver or Modification
MOD: Application of the Ordinance may not allow a landowner to use all division rights that have been allocated to
properties in the MOD - that is, because of measures in the Ordinance, parcels may not be able to be developed as
extensively as they would without these measures. Property owners would have the ability to moderate the effect of these
measures through waivers and modifications.
Such waiver or modification could be granted only upon a finding that alternatives proposed by the developer would
advance each of the purposes of the ordinance provisions to an equivalent or greater degree than strict application of these
requirements. In making this determination, the appropriate body-the Agent, Program Authority, or the Planning
Commission-would take into account the effects of the developer's overall plan for the property (including residential
construction and related road or driveway construction or road or driveway improvement), and if a waiver were issued, it
would include any conditions on development necessary to protect the purposes of the ordinance.
A variance from certain requirements could be sought under existing regulations (per Section 18-34.2).
Existinq Requlations: Provisions for waivers, modifications, or variances are currently available as either an administrative
or Planning Commission consideration.
What are the differences between the MOO proposal and existing regulations?
The waivers or modifications contained in the MOD proposal are specific to the MOD, as are waivers or modifications for
existing regulations.
What would be the benefit to the County?
As with current regulations, waivers, modifications or variances would be available if appropriate and/or applicable, in order
to provide flexibility for unusual site conditions.
How would expanding the MOO recommendation impact the Rural Areas?
The MOD recommendations to allow waivers, modifications, or variances parallel existing ordinance provisions.
What changes would be needed to implement this measure?
1. Ordinance revisions may be required.
2. Additional staff resources to process waivers, modifications, and variances.
BaS report 12 1306 work session.doc
Page 8 of 9
Part B. (Guidelines for Incorporation into a Future Rural Cluster Subdivision Ordinance for the MOD)
On September 13, 2006, the Board declined to approve the Resolution of Intent for the development of a rural cluster
subdivision ordinance. Rural Preservation Developments, currently allowed by Section 10.3.3, will continue to provide a
voluntary cluster form of development.
Part C. (Additional Protection for Mountain Resources)
The protection measures offered for consideration were not discussed by the Board at its September 13 meeting. Those
measures could also apply to the remainder of the Rural Areas.
80S report 12 13 06 work session.doc
Page 9 of 9
Attachment C
Discussion Points - Expandin2 the proposed MOD Stream Buffer provisions Countywide
The MOD framework would significantly increase the number of streams within the County that
would have stream buffer preservation requirements, and would significantly increase the width
of the buffers compared to existing regulations.
Number of Stream Miles Affected
Currently intermittent and perennial streams require a buffer in Water Supply Protection Areas
(watersheds draining to drinking water supply reservoirs). In the remainder of the County only
perennial streams require a buffer.
Total stream miles in the County currently requiring a buffer = approximately1,469 miles
MOD proposal would add requirements for intermittent streams in the remainder of the County.
Total stream miles in the County that would require a buffer with MOD Countywide
=approximate~v 2,197 miles
>- Total increase of approximately 728 miles.
Acreage of Land Affected
The buffer width currently required is 100' on each side of the stream, resulting in a buffer
corridor 200' wide.
Total acreage of buffer in the County currently required = approximately 35,612 acres
The MOD proposal would double the width of the buffer to 200' on each side of the stream,
resulting in a buffer corridor 400' wide.
Total acreage of buffer in the County required with MOD Countywide = approximately 106,521
acres.
,. Total increase of approximately 70,909 acres
Benefits
Buffers perform the functions of improving water quality through pollutant removal (including
nutrients nitrogen and phosphorus), filtering out sediment, controlling erosion, providing for
flood control, and the creation of habitat for aquatic and terrestrial species. There is substantial
research on how wide a buffer needs to be to optimally perform these functions. Different
widths are necessary for these different functions, so part of the issue is to determine what
specific functions we are hoping to achieve from the buffer.
Doubling the width of the buffer from 100' to 200' is not likely to yield additional water quality
benefits in tenns of pollutant and nutrient removal. Research shows that a forested buffer 100'
wide performs very well at improving water quality and at improving aquatic habitat. Additional
width does not appear to contribute to a proportional increase in the ability of the buffer to
perform these specific functions.
ATTACHMENT B
However, adding width is very likely to yield benefits for wildlife habitat for terrestrial species
and could provide better storage for floodwaters. Research indicates that buffers as wide as 300'
are desirable to achieve optimal habitat. If the County's buffer width were doubled and resulted
in a 400' wide corridor, a proportional improvement in habitat could be expected. In addition,
research indicates that to provide maximum protection from floods and maximum storage of
t1oodwaters, a buffer should include the entire floodplain. The County's current buffer
requirements do include the floodplain, except in the Development Areas. Extending the buffer
to 200' would likely incorporate more t100dplain and provide improved protection from flooding
in these more densely developed parts of the County.
Impacts
Current stream buffer requirements are contained in the County's Water Protection Ordinance.
Sections 17-317 through 17-322 would need to be amended to incorporate the changes. The
enabling authority to change these buffer requirements exists, under the Chesapeake Bay
Preservation Act, from which our current requirements are taken. Staff time would need to be
devoted to the task of amending the ordinance.
Currently staff is able to administratively authorize 'variances' to the buffer requirements for
items such as driveways and roadways through a buffer to allow access for reasonable use. The
MOD changes include a provision that a special use pennit would be needed to authorize such
variances. This would substantially increase the amount of staff time and effort to coordinate
these requests from applicants, and would significantly increase review and approval time.
However, the MOD changes could result in fewer applicant requests to encroach into the buffer,
resulting in higher quality buffers throughout the County.
These changes would require additional field work for applicant and staff to field delineate
intermittent streams that do not appear on the USGS maps. This task is currently only perfonned
in the Water Supply Protection Areas. It is very likely that requests from applicants to field
delineate intermittent streams in the remainder of the County would substantially increase.
These changes would require additional effort during staffs plan review to ensure that buffers
are delineated and preserved on development proposals. In addition, the changes would require
additional staff inspection and enforcement of buffer area protection during construction.
A TT ACHMENT B
-
Attachment D
County of Albemarle Zoning Ordinance
4.2.5 MODlFICA nON OR WAIVER
Any requirement of section 4.2 may be modified or waived in an individual case, as provided
herein:
a. A developer requesting such modification or waiver shall file a written request in accordance
with section 32.3.10.4 of this chapter and shall in such request address each concern set forth
in section 4.2. No such modification or waiver shall be granted until the commission shall
have considered the recommendation of the agent. The agent in formulating such
recommendation may consult with the county cngineer, Virginia Department of Health, water
resources manager and other appropriate officials. The county engineer shall evaluate the
potential for soil erosion, sedimentation and water pollution in accord with current provisions
of the Virginia Department of Transportation Drainage Manual, the Commonwealth of
Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook and Virginia State Water Control Board
best management practices, and where applicable, Chapter 17, Water Protection, of the Code.
(Amended 11-15-89)
b. Thc commission may modify or waive any requirement of section 4.2 in a particular case
upon finding that: (Amended 11-15-89)
1. Strict application of the requiremcnts of section 4.2 would not forward the purposes of
this chapter or otherwise serve the public health, safety or welfare, or that alternatives
proposed by the developcr would satisfy the purposes of section 4.2 to at least an
equivalent degree; or (Added 11-15-89)
2. Due to its unusual size, topography, shape of the property, location of the property or
other unusual conditions, excluding the proprietary interest of the developer, the
requirements of section 4.2 would effectively prohibit or unreasonably restrict the use of
the property or would result in significant degradation of the site or adjacent proper ties.
Such modification or waiver shall not be detnmental to the public health, safety or
welfarc, to the orderly development of the area, or to adjacent properties, or be contrary
to sound engineering practices; or (Added 11-15-89)
3. Granting such modification or waiver would serve a public purpose of greater import
than would be served by strict application of section 4.2. (Added 11-15-89)
c. In granting such modification or waiver, the commission may impose such conditions as it
deems necessary to protect the public health, safety or welfare and to insure that such
development will be consistent with the intent of section 4.2.
d. The board of supervisors shall consider a modification or waiver of any requirement of
section 4.2 only as follows:
1. The denial of a modification or waiver, or the approval of a modification or waiver with
conditions objectionable to the developer may be appealed to the board of supervisors as
an appeal ofa denial of the plat, as provided in section 14-226 of the Code, or the site
plan, as provided in section 32.4.2.7 or 32.4.3.9, to which the modification or waiver
pertains. A modification or waiver considered by the commission in conjunction with an
application for a special use permit shall be subject to review by the board of supervisors.
2. In considering a modification or waiver, the board may grant or deny the modification or
waiver based upon the findings set forth in subsection (B), amend any condition imposed
by the commission, and impose any conditions it deems necessary for the reasons set
forth in subsection (c).
(12-10-80, S 4.2.5;; 11-15-89; Ord. 01-18(4), 5-9-01)
4.2.6 EXEMPTIONS
A lot, structure, or improvement may be exempt from the requirements of section 4.2 as provided
herein: (Added 10-17-0 I)
a. Any structure which was lawfully in existence prior to the effectivc date of this chapter and
which is nonconforming solely on the basis of the requirements of section 4.2, may be
expanded, enlarged, extended, modified and/or reconstructed as though such structure were a
conforming structure. For the purposes of this section, the term "lawfully in existence" shall
also apply to any structure for which a site development plan was approved or a building
permit was issued prior to the effective date of this chapter, provided such plan or permit has
not expired. (Amended 10-17-01)
b. Any lot or parcel of record which was lawfully a lot of record on the effective date of this
chapter shall be exempt from the requirements of section 4.2 for the establishment of the first
single-family detached dwelling unit on such lot or parcel; provided that section 4.2.3.2 shall
apply to such lot or parcel if it contains adequate land area in slopes of less than twenty-five
(25) percent for the location of such structure. For the purposes of this section a
manufactured home shall be deemed a single-family detached dwelling unit. (Amended 10-
1 7 -01 )
c. Accessways, public utility lines and appurtenances, stormwater management facilities, and
any other public facilities necessary to allow the use of the parcel shall not be rcquired to be
locatcd within a building site and shall not be subject to thc requirements of this section 4.2.2,
provided that the applicant demonstrates that no reasonable alternative location or alignment
exists. The county engineer shall require that protective and restorative measures be installed
and maintained as deemed necessary to insure that the development will be consistent with
the intent of section 4.2 of this chapter. (Added 10-17-01)
(S 4.2.6, 12-10-80; Ord. 01-18(7), 10-17-01)
I
-e 8
= .-
= "t
.- aJ
~ .-
.- 0
;... ;...
~~
.-
~ ~
~;...
= =
1: 0
aJ r:Ij
> QJ
o~
= =
._ aJ
= ;...
=<
=,.....
o =
~ a
~
I
I
I
I
..~
"~ .,:.
.
1I
"
"
..
, '.
....
(.)
--
.... -
.... co
_~ tn
C 0
~c.
CO ~
1:n.
(l)t::
> CO
On.
c:
-- (I)
CO (I)
.... ....
C:.c
~I-
o
~
C)
c:
Q)
u
c:
ca
c:
.-
-c
s...
o
c:
ca
s...
o
....
~
s...
o
~
Q)
E
ca
s...
LL
.-
s...
Q)
.....
fn
~
-
U
Q)
s...
~
.....
~
....
s...
o
....
fn
Q)
c:
.-
-
Q)
-C
.-
~
C)
~
.....
s...
ca
c..
N
t::
ca
c..
i
I
fn
Q)
s...
~
fn
ca
Q)
:E
c:
o
.-
.....
U
Q)
.....
o
s...
c..
-
ca
c:
o
.-
.....
.-
-c
-C
<C
M
t::
ca
c..
co
(.)
o
o
~
(J)
...c
.......,
fA
(3)
Q.
o
-
en
.......,
--
L...
(.)
C)
c
--
..c
L...
::J
.......,
CJ)
--
"0
E
o
L...
'+-
c
.-
CJ)
(J)
0..
o
-
CJ)
CO
(.)
co
(.)
.......,
--
L...
(.)
C
o
"0
(J)
.......,
CO
(.)
o
--
...
--
s...
(.)
CJ) .......,
~ 0
CO C
~ (J) '+-
(J) L... 0
> CO c
L... CJ) 0
"0 C) .......,
"0 C ~
C "0 .......,
"" _ C
\U -- (J)
CJ) ::J (.)
"0 ..c c
CO ......., CJ) 0
e~ ~(J) (.)
.......,0..""""0..""""
cO(J)o~
(J) - L... - .......,
> CJ) ::J CJ) CO
(J) CJ) (J)
L... C L...
a... UJ <.9
-
.......,
--
L...
(.)
co
u
.
.
.
CO
.......,
c
(J)
.......,
o
0..
C)
C
--
"0
-
--
::J
..c
'+-
o
C
o
c --
ot)
CJ) ::J
0"0
L... (J)
(J) L...
"0 (J)
(J)::C
(.) --
::J CJ)
"0 CJ)
(J) 0
L... 0..
CJ)
.......,
(.)
CO
0..
E
(J)
'"0
.~
~
~
t:::
~
o
()
0)
t:::
. .......
~
Q..
Q..
CO
o
~
~
. .......
~
(J)
t:::
(J)
..Q
CO
(J)
..Q
'"0
--
~
~
~
(])
~
-
'" '"
QI (Q
D.~
.2<
"'-
(Q
fa s..
u :s
o+: cw=
0;: c
u ._
~ ~
.. ...
"0"1- ~
; ~ is
~ ; :; >-
~ ~ ~ ~
S t C ~
-a u -= ~ r:
.. .. I! "'"3
~;"o"
!i ~ i E ~
... :!l ..9 Q :t
:t <.... ,
)b+Dn
(
~
j
!
:1
J
--1z
c::
co
-
n.
-
o
L.
+'
c::
o
(J
+'
c::
cu
E
--
-c
cu
en
-c
c::
CO
c::
o
--
tn
o
L.
W
"'C
C
ro
~
o
~
"'C
0)
~
:::J
0-
0)
~
-
"'C
0)
~
0.
o
"'C
ro
en
en ._
.- - 0)
C ~ U
ro C C
0... ~ro
~ C
~ :::J.-
o U"E
:::J "-'" 0
0) O)~
.- U.-
I C"-'"
C roO
:: -eO
c .3 ~
0) en
E .- c
0) "'C::
0) ~ 0)
~ 0)
~ ~~
en 0) 0)
cO)~~
ro~ ro ~
~>:::J ~
O~ 0- \oJ
U en en
en ro 0
cO)oo
ro c g L!)..
0... .- .. N
CJ) -e 0
:::J~
~t)
.-
W"'C
.
~
o
.J::
en
~
o
~
.J::
0.
ro
~
0)
o
0.
o
~
0)
"'C
'>
o
~
0.
~
o
c
o
"'C
C
ro
0...
ro
~
o
:::J
0)
I
C
.-
en
~O)
Cc
0).-
E"'C
O)~
0)0)
~
0)
<(
c
o
~
U
:::J
~
~
en
c
o
U
0)
C
'C
:::J
"'C
~
c
0)
E
.-
"'C
0) en
enc
"'C ro O)E
c U
ro==~
c 8: ~
o ro 0)
'en 0 ">
o ~ 0)
~ ~ ~
0) en_
~oro
o U c
- 0
o "'C ._
~O):t=
~"'C"'C
c"'C"'C
8 ro ro
en
~
U
ro
0.
E
-+-"
t)
'-
~
CI)
"- CI)
a (1)
~Q..
co..2
1::: CI)
(1)-
~ co
Oj5
'-
t:: lo..::
'- t)
~..c
t:: "_
::J !o....:
o ~
~-o
0-
-+-" ::J
-+-" ~
i.i::: :::a.
(1) CI)
t::-+-"
(1) t::
..Q (1)
!...... E
~ (1)
co ~
~ 0)
O)~
(1)",-
-0 0
'S (1)
e ~
0..0)
-0 t::
- '-
::J-o
~L1j
t:
o
tn
'-
(1)
:1
:J
m
E
co
(1)
'-
.....
en
.....
o
Q)
.....
o
L-
[L
~
-
0.
0.
:J
en
L-
Q)
.....
ctS
s:
t:
L-
Q)
'I-
'I-
:J
.0
Q)
L-
:J
c-
Q)
L-
tJ)
E
ctS
Q)
L-
.....
tJ)
-
ctS
.-
t:
t:
Q)
L-
Q)
0.
'C
t:
ctS
.....
t:
Q)
.....
.....
EtJ)
O)L-ctS
t: Q) Q)
.....L-
en .E <c
.-
><
w .
tJ)
0)
t:
.-
tJ)
tJ)
o
L-
o
E
~ctS
..... Q)
t: L-
:J.....
o tJ)
Uo
'I- 'I-
O'C
..... Q)
tJ) L-
~ :J
t: C-
.- Q)
L-
'C tJ)
Q) Q)
t) 0
Q).....
..... 0
o ctS
L- L-
0.[L
tJ).....
E t:
ctS Q)
Q) E
L- Q)
.....0)
en ctS
t:
ctS
~
ctS
.-
t:
t:
~en
Q) Q)
[LCO
. .
tJ)
E
ctS
Q)
L-
.....
tJ)
.....
t:
Q)
.....
.....
E
L-
Q)
.....
t:
'C
t:
ctS
-
ctS
.-
t:
t:
Q)
L-
Q)
0.
L-
o
'I-
tJ)
L-
~
'I-
:J
.0
E
ctS
Q)
L-
'C.....
Q) tJ)
tJ)O
00
o.N
o
L-
[L .
'C
Q)
.....
o
Q) ctS
..... .-
0.....
L- t:
0.2
..... 0
So.
.0.....
ctS t:
~ Q)
tJ) E
Q) 0.
o
'Co-
Q) Q) Q)
..... 0. >
o tJ) Q)
Q)_'C
.....ctS'I-
o .- 0
L- L-
0. en t:
tJ) Q) 0
L-L-.....
2 ~ g
ctS.....
3:'C'C
'Ct:~
ctS ctS Q)
Q)Q)-
~~:e
c:atJ)
o=~
~S:[L
tJ)
.....
o
ctS
0.
E
-
cts
"0 '-
- (.)
~ \i::
o Q,)
CI)~ t::.....
t::..... ~. ~
.~ ~ .Q
~..Q Q,)CI)
- ..Q '-
t::'" Q
~~ "0
~:..- - ~
.,... ~cts
..... Q,) 0 ~
t:: t:: ~-
e Q,) ::io Q,)
Q,)..Q Q,)~
~~ ~o
"0:'::: ~. 5
Q,) cts ~ .fS
~ ~ ..... t::
Q,) 0" t:: ~
.- "'- ~ 0
~ ~ 8~
~ ~ CI) Q,)
.....- ES
~~ ctst::
-.... Q,)'-
cts 0 ~.....
CI);:; .........
CI)'- CI) ~
Q,) "0 ..... Q,)
(.)"0 t::~
Q,)ctsCl)~..Q
t:: ~ (; ~ "'-
Q,) Q,)..... ~ Q,)
lo;" .-'- E .....
cts ~..Q Q,) cts
~ o~ 1: e
..... .......... . - 0')
"0 ~ t:: 0 Q,)
. - Q,) cts ..... "0
~ ..lC - ~ '-
",-:.:::Q.~~
~ o"g ~ e
~t::cts~~
..Q CI) - ..Q -
E '- cts E ~
cts S.S cts ~
Q,)"Ot::Q,)~
,;;; . 3: cts .Q ~
CI) ~ CI) ~
..... 0') 'Q3 0') ~
a3 .5 t:: .5 ~
lo.;. :Q Q,) ~..Q
~ ~..QQ.o
._ 0 Q. <:::>
QQ <(('I
~~~qWtJ~ 'Jj' I~
y>"" ra:fl" ." 0<' 'E'" (',. .'~ 1 ~'
~~,~:-;<";'. . iI-' 1/,:;r-' ,"" "u,' ,I\-' J. .";:,,,r;-:c;. I .",., ~ ~ \. ", '" ~ I.
I. ;.-.-~, _ ~ . e I} I' ...;:VC"i ~"""'X"1~' 'n' .~ ~ ,r~ ~ I!! ~
\ j01~'" (_ J: ~~ I. '~,.!., ~:'5... "".x' :~~ . ~-/~.. ~V . ,~,:.'" .' ~'~. ~,l/;,::.:.J.. I I ~ ~
" ." -;r .~ ' ~ ~.. ~ / ..' ~ I · 1 (. ,~.. ~
\_ _ < _ '~.' ~~ \ " .." ; '" V' '" ' .' ' · - ' ~ -. ·
<-c--i"" C--" _ . ,'." . ,~.",lOil '.: ,,/1 '([:S .( ]ll
. _ .~. . t . . .:'t/.:y' '..k"'-~ ~'~_ . __ ~ ' . '.~"~ ~ .' t'i ' l-'" 1'4. ";:."E. ~r ,',' ) , " ,-:- '- '. ~ l n
~~ _)' :. ',' .. . _~\': ,,' ~ ..~ .~~"tt?~.\,~,~ ': ',', ',h, ",' :. ~
,: ,:,' ,," .', ..' ,';" g,,,, ~ ."", " '" '.' ,i' I' ....' 0
(?'. ~..t.; ~ ,(,' -:' :.i . \,;,'~ 0 .; ,; '},' ,:. '1;'"/ "'" "\:l '\'~ \ iY .,,: ' ': "'f -1
'" ".'". '..J. .k q'9 .19 . """'" , ,'" - . "~'- .,' .7 ".:; ;\ III I
~~:- . . ".~ \_> ~ (' : . I :.~ _ ,;. ;;...~ .,~ ~ .' (y..'~;!0 11,1:'
N).~ .L'r'~'~' ._' ,'i' ~. ',,' 7 '/ ',"<f'}':, -"'--, '''t~~:\ "-. ,.~,:..I~:._, '. HI : I
,_ . ' I _ \.... ~.~. " ' " --"".' ;:;r'o ' ' '. ' '.''' , " ' · ,
.... .'" . "._,<<",,' ,'r' ,,' . '01;'.44 :,*~.,/" ,:: - ' 1,'II,i'! ','
'.' " _// \ ,,, ..1,,,- . . ,'~ ' I ;':
_ __ .~' . . ^.i"'IYR"'" '17" . '.',cO' , ,c ,'1'1', "
~:' ;:__;, if 1 ~~' ~~'\; ~"'--., .. -tffif ;q" 0' . ,,~,-"'-' --, ''; -- ' .. ~
',' . il-cf\ '.1.<",\ " '~ ' · ,~/ lj' ~>:;Z;"K:)\~'';' ,,'~ ~
'OJ ~'-o;' k~ ' (-f "h ' r ,II 'f.."'!~ ";$ ~~' \, ,( ') !l
: .:i c .?;... ~'" I" .",- JP'll" \:...:'''' . '7...... .., --... .fl.'" '-', '" .,' \, - H
. "~' II" '. S & ,0(, . ~. '. · "", 0' ~ ~ 4 '"
.~ 'I 1Jl~'" . '" ':,' ~ "- .'7,:'0(' ....,' .,;; ~,. ~ .." '" :I .' ;' '"
. 0 1','" "'It t.~-;:< .X. ,,~~,\'i, " . '" ,./(' F"> 'J lL .p ~
, -1. ^ fl;!j::; ~I-:;"l<'''' y. ; ,,\c; V' ,"" ,b<mt "", ~... -~, , ", ~'~ ~ ~ i ~
~.--<, ~'" ' 'I';':\'. r"%~ ',..H,'" "Vffi ".' 0 ,} 0' ./ v ,,J J' 0 j ~
_ . ",\", ~,.''''- '<l'-~" .' . s,,:- ~18~' ,.:;, P 41' \ '..-l-, ". ~
~~ ~ ~'~. I'~~~'~ t~,~~\J ~ Il~~, " ,,,:' ,\ ,"t:t\ ~~\ · i
~.J!;1J' --.J~~' .1.1 ~ ~- -~~r!. =r -.,~~'~1: j'i.y-.:;A;" 1\';:
~.., "" en. __ v /-'~ ' '^' ,"" .' .". .,,-to " ,~, " , · "'" "" ' .o". '
~. ,"'" ""'A/W'" Co'" '.. ,'" ~'- '", · ..... ...,..... -' ''\; -' . . ~"" -, ...
. . } . \lJ!$;". t '-" !l';;..;f. ;'\ 'f{-~'Il ~JffH~'"r -..:'. .!
,"".;Wr..~.X~'.,,,c<,~-,,, ~,~,!b, ',1,00"'- ". 'r' ,!
. ;J,'. ,:' './- ;,', fJ'~'~6. ~ '".t.~ ''''," 'JT ~ ", ' ~~~.." =, ~'l:":-'~,.. '....J' , ! II II
.. 't\.'<- ,Ol' ..'"" '0;; /. ~~ --it;, c'" .' lilt."
r _.'~ \':.... ~ . y,aro. /' .!AI !l:j
",' \':",~ HI!!! II
....... Iii W H
.
l~l \
----. ~j ",,'
.......... ~"..'J
""- '-~C\i r.
.~. .~~ I'
...~~ ,
~."---------,
rQ~:
1.;.
t
" ...:....
r
)
'I
, l
~\ -\
1
..
.
..
~
....~r~ ~
"'.. ,-". --"~. ~ '~.0::J. .~... ~."~" ,'~::~\.'~~. r t t
' '= '" 'v , Wf/ ~ ~ \"t,1 " ,"
~= ~.(\' '/ "'" , ;;rc;,,=,., "'< "" '~."."'" Y' , ..
" qj" ~ " ' ',,~. 7" "': "",' 'I," \, 4"
Ir~ '1~'iitX~ ;,' J }. "r~ -'. ." ~~,.?,,:i(.:!;Q,~,"!, ' ,\, ,_ i, ~
t /' ~~ ,'... .,,1) I:' ~ if,t~ N .~ Ir\;:. .::::::. ", ~.;:~", ".~ : ,,,\\!:.~, ~a: }"C&~II/ "A _~ --=. _
~\ ~ ~. .. I \ "'~/t'- 'b~d. ,'. , " ~ · \, rc V, d. '- ,')',;:; "'\'", f:TI II
I\'. \ D"- ~ : ", h. ':'; '~>."...': '\\' ," '~!;z~q"~~j0\~'b)~J"[\~';i- .f'..:'\'~' . ~ 11111 I. I
IT '" " '" ' '" '. ,'0, -=, "'.. ". '."'"" ...... II' . .
r;,.;. '--" 0 .f. ~... \' <. ~,. '''s.\..' ~ '.,,;.\i( , , '",,~, '. b''r?: ,'/" I,: l" , !
-="., ~ -') ?'~'" . -, '~I ",' %:-'~l'Q,<t' ~ :;s;:RG~~"1 Y:"~ .:V '/~I 11'1 ;
~ ~ -..... '.- -'"' ~" \, , '.. ~'" " ~""~ .. ""'- ",=-4~Jk' . p" I,
~'. · '.~, t~ ~-':, ~. '" "\: "":', ~""" "', , '1::, ' ",- i,..",..
?'i" R',"" '''''''.\\'j;~ .',.~ -'--"~'1v",~::<.),~,:_", 1111 diL"!]
0: )~"" ').S; "~'.' I}'~ ' ~~, > C' " ^..~ "",''';,''' :-;"j;;,)~,~" ,',:; <;; "1:: , , ",,) _
",'" '" .. .', ., -", 'r-- · ~ , ~ ';>'It, 'C _ "i') ,
~:' '."" ,.'; 5\ " J_' ..,,Jf','. "',,\, ~ -;'-", ~'~ff;!~~' -~;" ,(f(v~A -"::,.~<, A i
'. '< .! \ ,. '-. .J,:. ~f',,~ '~;;';z..'"'I-, <: ' :~'-" "If' _", -', , . !
.. -? ~'" 'f.:.l~' ",', ", '"" - ..' i'; i , ':3:~, ',Cr.>-. ,,"" ~'~IlJ. ", Hi ~
." ~"-- \;: ~ '\ j\" " , " .,~./ ~. ,,"""",... \c.. ",'j "",~ ~ ~ _
?, , .~h~, ,; ';(~, ~ '.L '~I ,)" " ."""" ~--'_~J' ~ _ _ :'r:r.' e I!! a.
. {,., '., " ~.. , , '. ,~ · i '"
-J J.j~~.." · r', " '\ '0 ;;:; , .' "~,,,,--,.,, ~~ ,.. ., OJ d I ~
I. ~.:n < l~ 8 [~_,l.' ,. :;' .. f.~,<: "':;::' .(~,. ~~BII\ _ ~~_;', ~.' '.'0 ~~ ~
- ,,t: :7-. :y, -, I '~-::-. 'f-'\..- , . ,.", "'. , ..
~'1.. '- - r,\~.+: "(1'1, U ~.' O' ,:,',- j ..'" W' '_ ~ . -i--':f:(~~~~. ~..,
~; ~'~ "'-J"'- ) , ;' , l" )' · I"' ~'.."...., '", " '0 ", ""'-"'''>7~oI.'_' ". ,
II '''" ,-is)', , " ,\. , """ ". lo\i,:j ~, .. ~, ~
'P ~;:" ;."( ~" 'r.1 7 ~" \lo' . ': '\", ''''';., ~~ "J"i\\;'14,>:(~:' ~
;.' >:,(.~ ~?. ~\\ V>J.,~ ....J," .: ' ,3"1 rY"~, ~":tt" .,. dO"",,::: ..--::':'
r ,''In. · -~", i' c-- ,.~' .,-~" , ,'0\....." '..., .\1' '~,' '" _ '~___.
. "'\~l.~}\... '~::: 3'1 " ~.h ? <> '~I..' "~.::~""~-: ""II ) "f'
~ r....r~."'~~ I ;.,.......... ~\-,. '" ~.:.",.,.w~..?\..~. 1\"\ ^'~A ..~ Pl;:r~,,~(;: ) 'ho_
~Q: ~ . I L2 ~"\'\' ~\\~;;q;:{ 1\' i./ -< , ~";-" '%l\~> ,,'. ;'/{",(6/~.),~/O I!
'<":';....~ I "" ~.A'_, , ,'" ',~ '= '-< II
.' . /', ;Y""Z<Lr- (~l~l .... - " I /^ ~;~\. ':17 "ir-i?R~~. ;~,t:0i-':;;~;_}I!"' '1!'\"'1-~<'" II! Ii
.~ ~ 'i ~..Li I) " ~lcl':" :;J ~V ' , "7 /" ~"""'(,.,,,,," '_.,' ~~~~ ../,,;:.. "',' II... .j
... ~ ' '" ....J ~, , · '~~_~ " :;> e '1" o..~ '''" ',,' '....' 11110 Ii
o ~~ , 'l.N. ,)~\ ~\''''' ''r/ """..t, "t> " . - L..~" 'I "';<"..'"<:" "" ....~ ~,"'_ "', 'lll''!
~,~~~, ,,;:~, '-!'/rr;'/;J (f8 \':f'>//~ r:":,,;,~.._,> '~~,,"~;~~gj"J Wilill
""-", ,.....,. , to "". - "~. 'v "'--..~."'" "1'1 <e , ,'!,. ;.--:: '>"'\~~" ....::.....
}l(\,\;Vl ~~.~"/. /"" '. ~ \~~ ..... U! ~".;.:-:~ ' ~.., :v..,...^ t::/'".~~~' '.,.- , "
' 'c, ;"", 'I~ . , , I, <II;;
.....'.."',;;.A. i\;;\ )' _. . : 'y',"t\.. In _,
.... '"'" .,\. "-". " .
1L~~,l\!/I"II"'- .'
l'"
........
u
.~
~
CI)
'-
a
en ~
~ en co
CD eo eo 1:::
en .- CD ~
-+-' > -+-'
en '-
tn <( c 0
.... CD (,) CD
.J: '- .- c:
(,) C -+-'
eo 0 "-
C) ~ CD '- a. ~
-- (,) ::J c:
Q) 0 en 0:: CD 01 :J
:t - c 0
CD "'C -+-' E .- ~
..0 C ::J "'C
C) eo 0 -+-' - (J)
0 en .- :S
c: .c. ~ ::J
-+-' en -+-'
-- en CD 01 eo en ..0 c:
-c ::J -+-' 0 '-
-+-' (,) en CD
.c. 0 (,) ........
- '- (,) ~
-- 01 ::J '- - (J)
~ .c. eo -+-' ::J
.- 0 c c:
CD -+-' C "'C
aJ en eo (J)
.c. en 0 CD ..Q
CD CD (,) '- !o.......
01 '- -+-' .-
01 - ~ ~
C "'C a.
.- eo "'C "'C a. eo co
"'C '- '- <( <( ~ ~
- ::J
.- Ol
::J -+-' "'C
eo
..0 c C (J)
eo "'0
-+-' '-
(,) -+-' ~
.- (,) en e
'- CD -+-' en
-+-' en
en -+-' -+-' Q..
0 CD (,)
CD '- '- eo 32
0:: a.. u a. :J
E ~
. . .
#'
CI)
co
~ ~
...,
So....
"'C Q) ~
Q) c.. --
So.... 0 ~
:::J So....
en c.. ~
en a::
CO "'C
..., C Q)
0 CO :S
c ...,
en c ~ ~
en CO CO .- ~
en Q) - 0
Q) t) '+-
- So.... .- ..t::
en t) <( - 0
(1) .- c.. 0)
..c c.. c ~
(.) Q) CO CO 0 e
(.) > So.... .-
:::J 0 ...,
<C ~ t) :S
0:: ..., Q)
t)
..., ..., "0
JE c Q) en 0
Q) ..c 0 So.... Q)
CO 0> ..., "'C t) c.. :.::::
en So.... ..., Q) - - 2:
Q) :::J ..., CO CO
E 0 c c c CO
Q) ..c Q) 0 0 ~
0> E ..., ...,
So.... ~
~ :::J Q) "'C "'C
0 - "'C "'C
en So.... c.. <( <( ..e
..c E
en . .......
..., t::
Q) ..., ~
t) c Q)
t) CO ..c Q)
CO ..., ..Q
So.... "'C
~ 0 - en "0
:::J ...,
c.. t) --
CO E 0 CO ~
CJ) () c.. 0
-
E ..t::
CI)
. . .
.
.
ro
.-
......,
c
(])
......,
a
ro Cl.
> ......,
a c CI)
L- (]) CI)
fn Cl. E Q)
Cl. Cl. t)
i: ro a e
0 c -
(]) Q..
-- a
...... .- > Q)
CU en (])
(]) ""-'
(.) en -0 . .......
- -0
..c .- en
-- E '+- Q)
.... ro (]) a CI)
-- ~
-C - E > 0)
.- c
ro .-
0 a ......, a t:: Q)
> () ro .- . .......
:E ro c (]) ......, -0 '"0
L- E t) t:: --
en 0) (]) ~ '+:: ~
-C c c .-
......, ......, -0 ~
.- - '"0
i: a c ro 0) (])
.- L- t::
cu ......, C L- C
ro ro ~ .- (]) co ~
tn t) - en - ""-' Q)
.- n. en ..c t::
I.. '+- ~ . .......
.- (]) .- Q) :::::.; Q)
(1) -0 L- ......, en
.- t) @ --
a a - en ""-' -Q
> .- a t::
-- E (]) ..c L- a . ....... co
CU .- n. n. '"0 ~ --
> >< . .......
:: -0 .- (]) Q) . ....... ~
c ......, '+= ""-' ....-..
ro ~ ~ co
ro L- en
......, CI) ""-' ~
en en (]) CI)
L- .- -0 ~ . ....... co
(]) c . . t::
.- ......, Q)
.- > ~ . .......
> E a t) co .g Q..
.- ro
ro -0 L- Q) Q..
S <( n. Cl. -- <:(
E () <:(
. .
.
~
.
r--
I
.
,
i
"
1
~
.
,
t
~
.
...
"
l'
~.-
~
~~
.
~
~~
"
g
II
.
..
~
~
.".:
;&
.
.
r:..
~1","4>
~~..
.'
.~
)
...
~
::'to
~.
"'i
SAP
Statement to the Albemarle County Supervisors, December 13, 2006:
Oisturbina Decision-makina at Last Week's Board Meetina
JIm Jack Marshall, speaking to you on behalf of the 300 members of
Advocates for a Sustainable Albemarle Population.
Directors
Jack Marshall
President
AI Weed
Vice President
Elizabeth Burdash
Secretary
Geoffrey Mattocks
Treasurer
Rich Collins
Francis Rfe
Laura Horn
Tom Loach
Hugh Meagher
Carleton Ray
Andrew Wright
Advisorv Council
Diana Abbott
Gib Akin
Jim Bonner
Whitman Cross
Nick Evans
John Hermsmeier
Steve Jamme
Janis Jaquith
Harry Levins
Mark Lorenzoni
Marvin Moss
Deborah Murray
Tom Olivier
John Stack
Peggy Thome
Jane Williamson
At last week's Board meeting you concluded with two
actions that seemed disrespectful to constituents who
expect you to listen to our views before making
decisions on important issues.
With no advance warning to the community, with no
public hearing, and with an apparent disregard for
residents' concern about the impacts of relentless
population growth, Mr. Boyd proposed that $200,000
be earmarked to attract new businesses to Albemarle
County; four of you voted to approve this new
"economic opportunity fund." Mr. Boyd then moved
that the County become a member the Chamber of
Commerce, the most powerful lobbying group in the
area and a frequent advocate on issues you are
expected to consider without bias. Four of you voted
to approve that motion, too.
Executive Director
If it weren't for Charlottesville Tomorrow's podcasts
and an article in the Daily Progress, these pro-
business, pro-growth votes might have slipped
through without much notice - though I don't want to
believe these decisions were calculated to slide under
voters'radar. But why, then, would you not invite
comments at a public hearing before rushing through
with a vote? What was the urgency? Were you
unwilling to reopen the discussion - lengthy but
informative - that preceded the county's ill-advised
decision to become a member of the Thomas Jefferson
Partnership for Economic Development?
Jeff Sobel
3570 Brinnington Road
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Phone: (434) 974-6390
Fax: (434) 974-4924
asap@stopgrowthASAP.org
www.stopgrowl:t1ASAP.org Equally disturbing is the fact that your decisions on
these two issues provided solutions to problems that
don't exist, and fly in the face of available facts. There is no evidence
that new businesses in our county will provide jobs for our un- and
under-employed. Indeed, the week before your vote the Chief
Economist of the Virginia Employment Commissi'on' labeled Albemarle
County a "labor shortage" area, an area where the unemployment rate
is so low that there is a shortage of workers, not jobs.! 'If you are
g'enuinely concerned about our un- and under-employed, rather than
simply eager to import new businesses, the money could be far better
spent strengthening the very good workforce training opportunities in
our area.
Nor is there any evidence that Albemarle County's absence at the table
of the Chamber of Commerce has hindered our prosperity or impeded
communication. With actual membership in the Chamber, though,
you sacrifice the appearance of neutrality when a Chamber-supported
issue comes before you. And you open up the question of why the
County would support one advocacy group but not another - like, for
example, ASAP.
Your difficult work as supervisors becomes, regrettably, even more
cumbersome with input from us citizens. But please make time to
listen to our views on important issues. That's part of what a
representative democracy - and respect for your constituents -
demands.
Thank you.
1 Virginia Employment Commission, "Virginia Seasonally Unadjusted Unemployment Rates:
October 2006," 29 November 2006. As of December 12th, the press release was available
online at http://www.vec.virginia.gov/pdf/newpres1.pdf .
Tompkins County Relocalization Plan:
One Region's Preparations for Peak Oil
_...-.'! ,~. i/:(\~
J ",.{ \..,,1.. ." I
. "/\,, i . :Jj
Good evening. My name is Logan Blanco, and I live in Charlottesville. .' VAJu.t.l1/ .J ii,
I'd like to tell you about the Relocalization Plan that a citizens' group in 'f', xIC
Tompkins County, New York (which surrounds the city of Ithaca) has created to \~;:~
prepare for Peak Oil. This. P.~a_n, along with the Kinsale uvu.\ ()1 fl.,. \.j , l t/:.~___;
Plan, and the various cities' Peak Oil resolutions, ~an be found on the .)11
Charlottesville Peak Oil web site at www.cvillepeakoil.org.
After providing comprehensive evidence that world oil supplies will have
peaked by ;2010, not allowing time for a gradual transition to other fuels,
the Tompkins County Plan treats Peak Oil as a disaster management problem.
The Plan predicts widespread unemployment, accompanied by rising costs of
transportation, heating, food, and basic goods and services, and proposes
specific solutions to these challenges.
In regard to transportation, the Plan suggests expanding public transit,
possibly incorporating school buses when they're not being used to transport
students; resurrecting river transportation; and zoning for greater density
in both urban and rural areas.
In regard to food supply, the Plan recommends encouraging local food
production by lowering taxes on agricultural land, funding programs to train
people in sustainable gardening, and encouraging the development of community
supported agriculture. Imagining winters with food in short supply, the Plan
questions \,hether the County should have its own food preservation and
storage systems.
In regard to the potential for widespread unemployment, the Plan suggests
retraining people in farming, noting that the sizable expansion of local
agriculture needed to feed the population will be accompanied by a demand for
farm labor.. The Plan also suggests that, when it becomes too expensive for
big box chain stores to import goods from China, there will be a strong
market for locally manufactured goods.
When oil prices skyrocket, Albemarle County will share many of Tompkins
County's challenges, as well many of its assets: we have ample agricultural
land, rivers we could use for transportation, and a major research
university. We also have several active citizens' groups that are already
addressing the challenges associated with Peak Oil.
E.A.T. Local, a group that began as a UVI\ urban planning class studying our
regional food system, is busy creating a directory of local farms, starting a
food co-op, and launching a vegetable gardening program at Charlottesville
High Schoo:".
The Charlottesville Barter Network will soon be up and running, offering a
local currency that will allow people to barter with one another for goods
and services.
And the Alliance for Community Choice in Transportation encourages developing
safe routes for walking to school, using alternative transportation, and
creating a street car system.
And yet, there is a lot we can learn from the Tompkins County Relocalization
Plan. I hope you will take a look at it.
..
At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia,
held on the 13th day of December, 2006, the following members of the Board of Supervisors
were recorded as present:
PRESENT: Ken Boyd, Lindsay Domer, Dennis Rooker, David Slutzky, Sally Thomas,
David Wyant
On motion by Sally Thomas, seconded by Lindsay Dorrier, the attached Resolution was
adopted by a majority of the members of the Board of Supervisors by a roll call vote, the votes
being recorded as follows:
MEMBER
VOTE
Ken Boyd
Lindsay Domer
Dennis Rooker
David Slutzky
Sally Thomas
David Wyant
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
\4249053.1
RESOLUTION
OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE
COUNTY 01<' ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of the Town of Louisa, Virginia (the
"Authority"), has been requested by Region Ten Community Services Board, Inc. (the
"Company"), a non-profit, Virginia nonstock corporation, to approve the issuance of a revenue
bond in an amount not to exceed $8,000,000 ("Bond") to assist the Company in (1) refinancing
the Industrial Development Authority of Albemarle County, Virginia's $5,000,000 Variable Rate
Community Services Facilities Revenue Bonds (Region Ten Community Services Board, Inc.),
Series 1999, issued on August 31, 1999 originally issued to finance and refinance Company
facilities located in the County of Albemarle, Virginia and the City of Charlottesville, Virginia
(2) financing the acquisition, construction, renovation and equipping of the property known as
Mountainwood, to house the Company's administrative offices and community services, located
on an approximately 9 acre tract of land on Old Lynchburg Road, in the County of Albemarle,
Virginia and (3) financing the acquisition, construction, renovation and equipping of the Nelson
County Counseling Center located at Tanbark Plaza, Lovingston, Virginia in the County of
Nelson, Virginia (collectively, the "Project"), and has held a public hearing on December 7,
2006;
WHEREAS, Section 147(f) of the Intemal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
"Code"), provides that the governmental unit having jurisdiction over the area in which any
facility financed with the proceeds of private activity bonds is located must approve the issuance
of the bonds;
WHEREAS, a portion of the Project is to be located in the County of Albemarle, Virginia
(the "County") and the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia ("Board")
constitutes the highest elected governmental unit of the County;
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 147(f) of the Code, the public hearing held by
the Authority was within 100 miles of the County;
WHEREAS, for purposes of Section 15.2-4906 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as
amended (the "Virginia Code"), the Authority is issuing the portion of the Bond relating to the
portion of the Project located in the County on behalf of the County.
WHEREAS, the Authority has recommended that the Board approve the issuance of the
Bond; and
WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving the issuance of the Bond,
subject to the terms to be agreed upon, a certificate of the public hearing and a Fiscal Impact
Statement have been filed with the Board.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA:
-1-
1. The Board approves the issuance of the Bond by the Authority for the benefit of
the Company, as required by Section l47(f) of the Code and Section 15.2-4906 of the Code of
Virginia of 1950, as amended ("Virginia Code") to permit the Authority to assist in the financing
of the Project.
2. The Board concurs with the resolution to be adopted by the Authority and
approves the issuance of the Bond by the Authority for the benefit of the Company as required
by Section 15.2-4905 of the Virginia Code.
3. The approval of the issuance of the Bond does not constitute an endorsement to a
prospective purchaser of the Bond of the creditworthiness of the Project or the Company.
4. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
Adopted by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia this 13th day
of December, 2006.
I., r
( , {) l l ( L 1 I
Clerk, Board of Supervisors oft e County of
Albemarle, Virginia I
[SEAL]
-2-
December 7,2006
Board of Supervisors
Albemarle County, Virginia
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia
Industrial Development Authority
of the Town of Louisa, Virginia
Proposed Financing for Region Ten Community Services Board, Inc.
Region Ten Community Services Board, Inc. (the "Company") has requested that the
Industrial Development Authority of the Town of Louisa, Virginia ("Authority"), assist the
Company in (1) refinancing the Industrial Development Authority of Albemarle County,
Virginia's $5,000,000 Variable Rate Community Services Facilities Revenue Bonds (Region Ten
Community Services Board, Inc.), Series 1999, issued on August 31, 1999 originally issued to
finance and refinance Company facilities located in the County of Albemarle, Virginia and the
City of Charlottesville, Virginia (2) financing the acquisition, construction, renovation and
equipping of the property known as Mountainwood, to house the Company's administrative
offices and community services, located on an approximately 9 acre tract of land on Old
Lynchburg Road, in the County of Albemarle, Virginia and (3) financing the acquisition,
construction, renovation and equipping of the Nelson County Counseling Center located at
Tanbark Plaza, Lovingston, Virginia in the County of Nelson, Virginia by the issuance of its
revenue bonds in an amount not to exceed $8,000,000 ("Bonds").
As set forth in the resolution of the Authority attached hereto ("Resolution"), the
Authority has agreed to issue its Bonds as requested. The Authority has conducted a public
hearing on the proposed financing of the Project and has recommended that you approve the
issuance of the Bonds as required by Section l47(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, and Section 15.2-4906 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended.
Attached hereto is (1) a certificate evidencing the conduct of the public hearing and the
action taken by the Authority, (2) the Fiscal Impact Statement required pursuant to Virginia
Code Section 15.2-4907, and (3) the form of r lution suggested by couns 1 to evidence your
approval.
\42818062
FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT
FOR PROPOSED BOND FINANCING
Date: December 7,2006
To the Board of Supervisors
of Albemarle County, Virginia
Applicant: Region Ten Community Services Board, Inc.
Facility: Facilities for the Care and Treatment of Persons With Mental Disabilities
1, Maximum amount of financing sought.
$
3,540,100
2. Estimated taxable value of the facility's real property
to be constructed in the locality.
$
5,153,100
3. Estimated real property tax per year using present tax
rates.
$
38,133
4. Estimated personal property tax per year using
present tax rates.
$
N/A
5. Estimated merchants' capital tax per year using
present tax rates.
$
N/A
6. (a) Estimated dollar value per year of goods that will be
purchased from Virginia companies within the
locality.
$
183,000
(b) Estimated dollar value per year of goods that will be
purchased from non-Virginia companies within the
locality.
$
64,000
(c) Estimated dollar value per year of services that will
be purchased from Virginia companies within the
locality.
$
186,000
(d) Estimated dollar value per year of services that will
be purchased from non-Virginia companies within
the locality.
$
210,000
7.
Estimated number of regular employees on year
round basis.
35
8.
Average annual salary per employee
32,000
CERTIFICATE
The undersigned Secretary of the Industrial Development Authority of the Town of
Louisa, Virginia ("Authority") certifies as follows:
1. A meeting of the Authority was duly called and held on December 7, 2006, at
7:00 o'clock p.m. in the Town Council chambers at 212 Fredericksburg Avenue, in Louisa,
Virginia, pursuant to proper notice given to each Director of the Authority before such meeting.
The meeting was open to the public. The time of the meeting and the place at which the meeting
was held provided a reasonable opportunity for persons of differing views to appear and be
heard.
2. The Chairman announced the commencement of a public hearing on the
application of Region Ten Community Services Board, Inc. and that a notice of the hearing was
published once a week for two successive weeks in a newspaper having general circulation in the
Town of Louisa, Virginia ("Notice"), with the second publication appearing not less than seven
days nor more than twenty-one days prior to the original hearing date of November 28,2006, A
copy of the Notice has been filed with the minutes of the Authority and is attached as Exhibit A.
The original public hearing scheduled on November 28 was postponed due to a lack of a
quorum. The location of the original public hearing was posted with a sign notifying all possible
attendants that the meeting would be continued to December 7, 2006 at 7:00 o'clock p.m. at the
same location. A copy of the posted sign is attached as Exhibit B.
3. A summary ofthe statements made at the public hearing is attached as Exhibit C.
4. Attached as Exhibit 0 is a true, correct and complete copy of a resolution
("Resolution") adopted at such meeting of the Authority by a majority of the Directors present at
such meeting. The Resolution constitutes all formal action taken by the Authority at such
\4229] 48.3
meeting relating to matters referred to in the Resolution. The Resolution has not been repealed,
revoked, rescinded or amended and is in full force and effect on this date.
-2-
WITNESS my hand and the seal of the
[SEAL]
Exhibits:
A - Copy of Certified Notice
B - Copy of Posted Sign
C - Summary of Statements
D - Inducement Resolution
-3-
The Daily Progress
P.O. BOX 9030
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22906
TELEPHONE: (434)978-7210
CERTIFICATE OF PUBLICATION
TO:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ATTACHED NOTICE WAS PUBLISHED IN
THE DAILY PROGRESS, A NEWSPAPER IN CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA,
AND APPEARED IN THE ISSUE(S) DATED NOVEMBER I~ 2.~
OCTOBER
2006.
2006.
PUBLISHING FEE: $
s ~(). BO
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND THIS 27TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2006
KATHLEEN HICKS, CREDIT MANAGER
~~~""Oo
~c.80~~
S ~ ~ 0
~] ~""O~
o~~ Q)
o ~ ~ s .~
:> Q) 0.- ~
Q)~~~O
Q~~8~
~ ~ ""0 U Q)
.~ ~ ] ~ .s
t).S ~ ~ .5
~ .~ & ~ Q)
o ~ ~ ~
~ 0 rJJ ja.,f\ t1)
~ 0 ~~
In._ ~ 0 .
....., ~ .- d
i3.- ~ ~ ~
~ep~V~
o . - ..r:; ..d r-
> r:n Co)
bJJ .., ~ .- "t:
o~~~w
. _ r.n ..r;;
~ . - .;:::i ["---.
~;:::i S ~~
....., o. Q)
..d ~ ~ ""0 ..r:;
u~r-as
;..= o~ V
~ s:~gpg
~ ;;> 00 '.c 0
o N Q)
""0 ~ ~ Q)
~ Q) Q) S
ro ..d ..0
bI) c:: E
$::::l 0 V
.- >
~ ~ 0
V.........Z
V ._
8~"-'
o ~
Q) -:S ro
..c:~""O
~~.8
..,
~
~ .
""0 r.n
Q) r.n Q)
....c:: ~ u
E-1]S
~ 0
8 ~:;:::
2 0 g
o ""0 ~
= 03 0
~...s= U
Q)
-:S
~
o
~
~
.-
~
o
~
=
~ ro
.-
~ 0
~ .-
Q) bl)
S .=:
~>
o ..,
~ ro
V r:n
> .-
Q) ;j
Q 0
~.~
~~
.C 0
~ 0
.g ~
~ 0
~~
EXHIBIT C TO CERTIFICATE
Summary of Statements
Representatives of Region Ten Community Services Board, Inc. and McGuireWoods
LLP, bond counsel, appeared before the Authority to explain the proposed plan of financing. No
one appeared in opposition to the proposed bond issue.
RESOLUTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
OF THE TOWN OF LOUISA, VIRGINIA
AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF UP TO $8,000,000
REVENUE BOND FOR THE BENEFIT OF
REGION TEN COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD, INC.
WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of the Town of Louisa, Virginia, a
political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia ("Authority"), is empowered by the
Industrial Development and Revenue Bond Act, Chapter 49, Title 15.2, Code of Virginia of
1950, as amended ("Act"), to issue its revenue bonds to promote the welfare of the inhabitants of
the Commonwealth of Virginia by assisting in the acquisition, construction and equipping of
projects for use by organizations which are described in S501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended (the "Code") and which are exempt from federal income taxation pursuant
to g501(a) of the Code and is further empowered to issue its revenue bonds for the purpose of
carrying out its powers;
WHEREAS, the Authority has received a request from Region Ten Community Services
Board, Inc. a non-profit, Virginia nonstock corporation (the "Borrower"), requesting that the
Authority issue its revenue bond to assist in (1) refinancing the Industrial Development
Authority of Albemarle County, Virginia's $5,000,000 Variable Rate Community Services
Facilities Revenue Bonds (Region Ten Community Services Board, Inc.), Series 1999, issued on
August 31, 1999 originally issued to finance and refinance Borrower facilities located in the
County of Albemarle, Virginia and the City of Charlottesville, Virginia (2) financing the
acquisition, construction, renovation and equipping of the property known as Mountainwood, to
house the Borrower's administrative offices and community services, located on an
approximately 9 acre tract of land on Old Lynchburg Road, in the County of Albemarle, Virginia
and (3) financing the acquisition, construction, renovation and equipping of the Nelson County
Counseling Center located at Tanbark Plaza, Lovingston, Virginia in the County of Nelson,
Virginia (collectively, the "Project");
WHEREAS, such assistance will induce the Borrower to locate the Project in Virginia
and benefit the inhabitants of the Town of Louisa, Virginia and the Commonwealth of Virginia,
either through the increase of their commerce or through the promotion of their safety, health,
welfare, convenience or prosperity;
WHEREAS, preliminary plans for the Project have been described to the Authority and a
public hearing has been held as required by Section I 47(t) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended, ("Code") and Section 15.2-4906 of the Act;
WHEREAS, the Borrower has represented that the estimated cost of the acquisition,
construction, renovation and equipping of the Project and all expenses of issue will require an
issue of revenue bonds in the aggregate principal amount not to exceed $8,000,000 (the "Bond");
WHEREAS, the Bond will be a limited obligation of the Authority, the principal of,
premium, if any, and interest on which will be payable solely out of the receipts and revenues of
the Authority from the Loan Agreement dated as of December 1, 2006 (the "Loan Agreement"),
between the Authority and the Borrower.
WHEREAS, the foregoing arrangements will be reflected in the following documents
which the Authority proposes to execute to carry out the transaction described above, forms of
which have been presented to this meeting and filed with the Authority's records:
(a) the Loan Agreement;
(b) the Bond Purchase Agreement dated as of December 1, 2006 relating to the Bond
among the Authority, the Borrower and Branch Bank and Trust Company, as purchaser of the
Bond; and
(c) a form of the Bond, bearing interest, maturing and payable as provided therein
and in the Loan Agreement and which is attached to the Bond Purchase Agreement.
All of the documents listed above, except the Bond, are referred to in this Resolution as
the "Basic Documents".
WHEREAS, (a) no member of the Board of Directors of the Authority is an officer or
employee of the Town of Louisa, Virginia, (b) each member has, before entering upon his duties
during his or her present term of office, taken and subscribed to the oath prescribed by Section
49-1 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended and (c) at the time of their appointments and at
all times thereafter, including the date hereof, all of the members of the Board of Directors of the
Authority have satisfied the residency requirements of the Act; and
WHEREAS, no member of the Board of Directors of the Authority has any personal
interest or business interest in the Borrower, the bond, or any of the transactions contemplated
therein or has otherwise engaged in conduct prohibited under the Conflict of Interests Act,
Chapter 31, Title 2.2 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended (the "Conflict of Interests
Act") in connection with this resolution or any other official action of the Authority in
connection therewith.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY OF THE TOWN OF LOUISA, VIRGINIA:
1. It is hereby found and determined that the acquisition, construction, renovation
and equipping of the Project will be in the public interest and will promote the commerce, safety,
health, welfare, convenience or prosperity of the Commonwealth of Virginia, the Town of
Louisa, Virginia, and their citizens.
2. The issuance of the Authority's revenue bond pursuant to the Loan Agreement to
be known as the Industrial Development Authority of the Town of Louisa, Virginia Community
Services Facilities Revenue Bond (Region Ten Project), Series 2006, in a principal amount not to
exceed $8,000,000 is hereby authorized and approved. The Bond shall be in substantially the
form with substantially the terms provided therein as attached as an exhibit to the Bond Purchase
Agreement.
3. The Bond and the Basic Documents are approved in substantially the forms
submitted to this meeting, with such changes, insertions or omissions (including, without
limitation, changes of the dates thereof) as may be approved by the Chair or the Vice Chair of
-2-
the Authority, whose approval will be evidenced conclusively by the execution and delivery of
the Bond.
4. The execution, delivery and performance by the Authority of the Basic
Documents to which it is a party are authorized. The execution of the Bond and its delivery
against payment therefor, the amount of such payment to be disbursed in accordance with the
terms of the Loan Agreement, are authorized.
5. The Chair or the Vice Chair of the Authority are each authorized to execute on
behalf of the Authority the Bond and the Basic Documents to which the Authority is a party, and
the Secretary or Assistant Secretary of the Authority are each authorized to affix the seal of the
Authority to the Bond and, if required, the Basic Documents and to attest such seal. The
signatures of the Chair or Vice Chair and the Secretary or Assistant Secretary and the seal of the
Authority may be by facsimile. Each officer of the Authority is authorized to execute and
deliver on behalf of the Authority such instruments, documents or certificates, and to do and
perform such things or acts, as he or she deems necessary or appropriate to carry out the
transactions authorized by this Resolution or contemplated by the Bond, the Basic Documents or
such instruments, documents or certificates, and all of the foregoing, previously done or
performed by such officers of the Authority, are in all respects approved, ratified and confirmed.
6. The Authority determines that the issuance of the Bond in accordance with the
terms of the Basic Documents and all actions of the Authority contemplated by them will be in
furtherance of the purposes for which the Authority was organized.
7. It having been represented to the Authority that it is necessary to proceed
immediately with the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Project, and the planning
therefor, the Authority agrees that the Borrower may proceed with plans for the Project, enter
into contracts for land, construction, materials and equipment for the Project, and take such other
steps as it may deem appropriate in connection with the Project, provided, however, that nothing
in this resolution shall be deemed to authorize the Borrower to obligate the Authority without its
consent in each instance to the payment of any moneys or the performance of any acts in
connection with the Project. The Authority agrees that the Borrower may be reimbursed from
the proceeds of the bonds for all expenditures and costs so incurred by it, provided such
expenditures and costs are properly reimbursable under the Act and applicable federal laws.
8. At the request of the Borrower, the Authority approves McGuireWoods LLP,
Richmond, Virginia, as Bond Counsel in connection with the issuance of the bond.
9. All costs and expenses in connection with the financing and the acquisition,
construction, renovation and equipping of the Project, including the fees and expenses of Bond
Counsel and Authority Counsel, shall be paid by the Borrower or, to the extent permitted by
applicable law, from the proceeds of the bond. If for any reason such bond is not issued, it is
understood that all such expenses shall be paid by the Borrower and that the Authority shall have
no responsibility therefor.
lO. In adopting this resolution the Authority intends to take "official action" toward
the issuance of the bond and to evidence its "official intent" to reimburse from the proceeds of
-3-
the bond any expenditures paid by the Borrower to finance the acqUIsItIOn, construction,
renovation and equipping of the Project and the planning therefor before the issuance of the
bond, all within the meaning of regulations issued by the Internal Revenue Service pursuant to
Sections 103 and 141 through 150 and related sections of the Code.
11. The Authority recommends that the governing bodies of the Town of Louisa,
Virginia, the City of Charlottesville, Virginia and the Counties of Albemarle and Nelson,
Virginia approve the issuance of the bond.
12. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
-4-
CERTIFICATE
The undersigned Secretary of the Industrial Development Authority of the Town of
Louisa, Virginia ("Authority") certifies that the foregoing is a true, correct and complete copy of
a resolution adopted by a majority of the Directors of the Authority present and voting at a
meeting duly called and held on December 7, 2006, in accordance with law, and that such
resolution has not been repealed, revoked, rescinded or amended but is in full force and effect on
this date.
2006.
WITNESS the following signature and seal of the Authority, this ih day:
[SEAL]
At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia,
held on the _ day of December, 2006, the following members of the Board of Supervisors
were recorded as present:
PRESENT:
On
motion
by
seconded
by
, the attached Resolution was adopted by a majority of the
members of the Board of Supervisors by a roll call vote, the votes being recorded as follows:
MEMBER
VOTE
\4249053.1
RESOLUTION
OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of the Town of Louisa, Virginia (the
"Authority"), has been requested by Region Ten Community Services Board, Inc. (the
"Company"), a non-profit, Virginia non stock corporation, to approve the issuance of a revenue
bond in an amount not to exceed $8,000,000 ("Bond") to assist the Company in (1) refinancing
the Industrial Development Authority of Albemarle County, Virginia's $5,000,000 Variable Rate
Community Services Facilities Revenue Bonds (Region Ten Community Services Board, Inc.),
Series 1999, issued on August 31, 1999 originally issued to finance and refinance Company
facilities located in the County of Albemarle, Virginia and the City of Charlottesville, Virginia
(2) financing the acquisition, construction, renovation and equipping of the property known as
Mountainwood, to house the Company's administrative offices and community services, located
on an approximately 9 acre tract of land on Old Lynchburg Road, in the County of Albemarle,
Virginia and (3) financing the acquisition, construction, renovation and equipping of the Nelson
County Counseling Center located at Tanbark Plaza, Lovingston, Virginia in the County of
Nelson, Virginia (collectively, the "Project"), and has held a public hearing on December 7,
2006;
WHEREAS, Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
"Code"), provides that the governmental unit having jurisdiction over the area in which any
facility financed with the proceeds of private activity bonds is located must approve the issuance
of the bonds;
WHEREAS, a portion of the Project is to be located in the County of Albemarle, Virginia
(the "County") and the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia ("Board")
constitutes the highest elected governmental unit ofthe County;
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 147(f) of the Code, the public hearing held by
the Authority was within lOO miles of the County;
WHEREAS, for purposes of Section 15.2-4906 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as
amended (the "Virginia Code"), the Authority is issuing the portion of the Bond relating to the
portion of the Project located in the County on behalf of the County.
WHEREAS, the Authority has recommended that the Board approve the issuance of the
Bond; and
WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving the issuance of the Bond,
subject to the terms to be agreed upon, a certificate of the public hearing and a Fiscal Impact
Statement have been filed with the Board.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA:
-1-
1. The Board approves the issuance of the Bond by the Authority for the benefit of
the Company, as required by Section 147(f) of the Code and Section 15.2-4906 of the Code of
Virginia of 1950, as amended ("Virginia Code") to permit the Authority to assist in the financing
of the Project.
2. The Board concurs with the resolution to be adopted by the Authority and
approves the issuance of the Bond by the Authority for the benefit of the Company as required
by Section 15.2-4905 of the Virginia Code.
3. The approval of the issuance of the Bond does not constitute an endorsement to a
prospective purchaser of the Bond of the creditworthiness of the Project or the Company.
4. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
Adopted by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia this _ day
of December, 2006.
Clerk, Board of Supervisors of the County of
Albemarle, Virginia
[SEAL]
-2-
McGuireWoods LLP
One James Center
901 East Cary Street
Richmond, VA 23219-4030
Phone: 804.775.1000
Fax: 804.775.1061
www.mcguircwoods.com
Jessica C. Kleinhans
Direct: ilO4.77S.1 026
r~\
......~
j klei nhans@mcguirewoorls.com
Direct Fax: 804.775.1061
December 1, 2006
BY FEDERAL EXPRESS
Ella W. Carye
Clerk, Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Rd
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Industrial Development Authority of Fluvanna County, Virginia
Proposed Financing for Westminster-Canterbury of Blue Ridge
Dear Ella:
Enclosed are your copies of the Proposed Financing for the subject bond
transaction. Please make sure that this is on the agenda for the Board of Supervisors
meeting on Wednesday, December 13, 2006.
Very truly yours,
. ~.. I fill
i / .' I' L" . .
II v)fCt{./ '-_/' lJ:j,) i f) {~~,
Jessica C. Kleinhans
P}aralegal
Enclosure
At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia,
held on the 13th day of December, 2006, the following members of the Board of Supervisors
were recorded as present:
PRESENT: Ken Boyd, Lindsay Domer, Dennis Rooker, David Slutzky, Sally Thomas,
David Wyant
On motion by Sally Thomas, seconded by Lindsay Domer, the attached Resolution was
adopted by a majority of the members of the Board of Supervisors by a roll call vote, the votes
being recorded as follows:
MEMBER
VOTE
Ken Boyd
Lindsay DOITier
Dennis Rooker
David Slutzky
Sally Thomas
David Wyant
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
RESOLUTION
OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of Fluvanna County, Virginia (the
"Authority"), has been asked by Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge (the "Company"), a
non-profit, Virginia nonstock corporation, to approve the issuance of a revenue bond in an
amount not to exceed $4,000,000 ("Bond") to assist the Company in financing the costs of
capital improvements at the Company's existing residential care retirement facility located at 250
Pantops Mountain Road in the County of Albemarle, Virginia including without limitation the
construction and equipping of additional cottages at the facility ("Project"), and has held a public
hearing on November 29,2006;
WHEREAS, Section 147(t) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
"Code"), provides that the governmental unit having jurisdiction over the area in which any
facility financed with the proceeds of private activity bonds is located must approve the issuance
of the bonds;
WHEREAS, the Project is to be located in the County of Albemarle, Virginia (the
"County") and the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia ("Board")
constitutes the highest elected governmental unit of the County;
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 147(t) of the Code, the public hearing held by
the Authority was within 100 miles of the County;
WHEREAS, for purposes of Section 15.2-4906 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as
amended (the "Virginia Code"), the Authority is issuing the Bond on behalf of the County.
WHEREAS, the Authority has recommended that the Board approve the issuance of the
Bond; and
WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving the issuance of the Bond,
subject to the terms to be agreed upon, a certificate of the public hearing and a Fiscal Impact
Statement have been filed with the Board.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA:
1. The Board approves the issuance of the Bond by the Authority for the benefit of
the Company, as required by Section 147(t) of the Code and Section 15.2-4906 of the Virginia
Code to permit the Authority to assist in the financing of the Project.
2. The Board concurs with the resolution to be adopted by the Fluvanna Authority
and approves the issuance of the Bond by the Authority for the benefit of the Company as
required by Section 15.2-4905 of the Act.
3. The approval of the issuance of the Bond does not constitute an endorsement to a
prospective purchaser of the Bond of the creditworthiness of the Project or the Company.
4. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
Adopted by the Board of Supervisors of e County of Albemarle, Virginia this 13th day
of December, 2006. (/,
.. flL u I {
Cler , Board of Supervisors 0 the County of
Albemarle, Virginia (
[SEAL]
November 29, 2006
Board of Supervisors
County of Fluvanna, Virginia
132 Main Street
Palmyra, Virginia 22963
Board of Supervisors
County of Albemarle, Virginia
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902
Industrial Development Authority
of Fluvanna County, Virginia
Proposed Financing for \Vestminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge
Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge (the "Company") has requested that the
Industrial Development Authority of Fluvanna County, Virginia ("Authority"), assist the
Company in financing the costs of capital improvements at the Company's existing residential
care retirement facility located at 250 Pantops Mountain Road in the County of Albemarle,
Virginia including without limitation the construction and equipping of additional cottages at the
facility ("Project"), by the issuance of its revenue bonds in an amount not to exceed $4,000,000
("Bonds").
As set forth in the resolution of the Authority attached hereto ("Resolution"), the
Authority has agreed to issue its Bonds as requested. The Authority has conducted a public
hearing on the proposed financing of the Project and has recommended that you approve the
issuance of the Bonds as required by Section 147(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, and Section 15.2-4906 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended.
Attached hereto is (I) a certificate evidencing the conduct of the public hearing and the
action taken by the Authority, (2) the Fiscal Impact Statement required pursuant to Virginia
Code Section 15.2-4907, and (3) the form of resolution suggested by counsel to evidence your
approval.
.~~
Secretary, Industrial Development Authori '
of Fluvanna County, Virginia
427965 I 1
CERTIFICA TE
The undersigned Secretary of the Industrial Development Authority of Fluvanna County
("Authority") certifies as follows:
1. A meeting of the Authority was duly called and held on November 29, 2006, at
6:00 o'clock p.m. at the Historic Courthouse, Court Green, in Palmyra, Virginia, pursuant to
proper notice given to each Director of the Authority before such meeting. The meeting was
open to the public. The time of the meeting and the place at which the meeting was held
provided a reasonable opportunity for persons of differing views to appear and be heard.
'I
.:-.
The Chairman announced the commencement of a public hearing on the
application of Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge and that a notice of thc hearing was
published once a week for two successive weeks in a newspaper having general circulation in the
County of Fluvanna, Virginia ("Notice"), with the second publication appearing not less than
seven days nor more than twenty-one days prior to the hearing date. A copy of the Notice has
been filed with the minutes of the Authority and is attached as Exhibit A.
3. A summary of the statements made at the public hearing is attached as Exhibit B.
4. Attached as Exhibit C is a true, correct and complete copy of a resolution
("Resolution") adopted at such meeting of the Authority by a majority of the Directors present at
such meeting. The Resolution constitutes all formal action taken by the Authority at such
meeting relating to matters referred to in the Resolution. The Resolution has not been repealed,
revoked, rescinded or amended and is in full force and clIect on this date.
42795'75.1
WITNESS my hand and the seal of the Authority, this 29th day of November, 2006.
a5~r:: ~
Secretary, Industrial Development Authority---
of Fluvanna County, Virginia
[SEAL]
Exhibits:
A - Copy of Certified Notice
B - Summary of Statements
C - Inducement Resolution
-2-
11/27/2005 12:38
4349787214
DAILY PROGRESS
PAGE 02/03
The Daily Progress
P.O. BOX 9030
CHARLOTIESVILLE, VA 22906
TELEPHONE: (434)978-7210
CERTIFICATE OF PUBLICATION
TO: ~~
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ATTACHED NOTICE WAS PUBLISHED IN
THE PAIL Y PROGRESS, A NEWSPAPER IN CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA,
AND APPEARED IN THE ISSUE(S) DATED NOVEMBER. /.s;.-2 2..
OCTOBER
PUBLISHING FEE: $
138~3L-
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND THIS 27TH DAY OF NOvEMBER 2006
2006.
2006.
. tIIO~(jJFiJ1tJa['1tH41:t~hJNGON .
.~SEI)REVENOEaOND
".F1I'4ANClNIiI.iY.tNtJDSrffiAl
DEVEl.ORMENtAt.'ITHIJRI'f:Y.OF
,f~~VAI'IN~.C?U~n:,'\lI~GINIA'. '.~.
Notlce '1JsIhetebyg!ven \ha\{'tl1~ Indu!;trl:ll D~.
v~lotl1)l~t, ,AothorltYo'f~luvimna . County,
virgfnla("I\QI:l1O!ity').: whose .address Is 132
Marn Stt"eet, P~lrnyra, vit9inla Z2963will '
hold a' plibllche~r1ng On tire MolIClltion of
Westmil1S~r'Cant~rbutY .01 .the lllueRldge
(the "CDl11pllTlf~, ,whose .,addtessi$'2SDPan.
tops Mountain Road, Charlllttl!svllle, Vlrglliia
22901. re~uestrll1l.,llle. Authority '.' to 1s;ue' .up
to$4,OOO,GOIlof ItsreveniIebOmls to asSist'
tht'jCoo1p;ltn' in fln~eing .thecosts ,91 capl'l
tal iIipr:oyements at 'Ure 'COlTlplll1Y'5.e.I;lstil19
I r~s.l.de' ..relir.etnent ladlltyloclIled
I .,.1it,250.MQuntam'll<Iad in'\he >Coun. ,
"'.:!t,.OfO" , Ie. oIJIrglnla Inc!udlngwltl1oUt .
i ':h/!\it:!g~I1;1 e con~uC1ijOll: Ilnd.1!qulpplng of
,~~!t!,~artottages atthelfaClllty,.. ", .'
;'lii"'~~~~ "'(if, reVi!nui .'bDdtk.~ ' .i'liqtletm~'
I': ...tM';campan~ wUln~COr\S~tuw a deb~or
, '. edg1!oflhe f:llth;,ah'd,' r:rodll,tif 4he~m-
monwealth .Qf Vi~lnj~ . !;it . \l1e Cll1JrttYlif 'FIll, .
vanna. Vi .neltllerthe, .falth.an. ~"
~n!dlt nor. ..~Wer: :of tlli! common.
~1IIt~..<if .,or lan~J~litlcal.su~dlvi...
'$lon'tJte e. p\/ldgea.tlJtM 'pllymlli'it'
ofsuch,bond~~, .~. ':',; .......
rnepublie~i1rin '. wh h. may be continued
'or. ,1ldIOUmed;'WI~Llr~held .at "6:00 "~'clock,
p;m.on . NOVember . 29~2006, before .lheAu,
.thodl)', .i1tthe Hlstor ,/CnurthllUse,:Court
Grcen,ln PalmY1ll.VI . lilla;' . 'Al1Yllerson 'in<
,tere~ell .'1n the ,Issuance of the ,:bonds orttJe
loc~tiOlr ,'tlt'llaMe!',c;f 'ltlle'..propo;ed. .profect
'mll)' appea~..'Bt! 'the <hellflTlll [.and ,i~sertt hi;
or 'her vfffiS;:' 'Ihformation ...tegu~lngthc:
...:Qm. p~er;n.p.llcatlon':,ll;... . "on 'file.' and ,1$ Q.p. .en.,
lodri . or ~ .ft; 11il!'AUIlloii!y:s' .iIfflce arm'
'MIlIR.' ..':'Palrnjt:~\1IrV1A~'ZZ9Ga :d~fll1~.
,buslnest hOIlI"S. . 'I
Ind~M;Dli\It!I Gjlml!ltt.AtJtIlor Ity.
tIl'P.'1tI\1mlrtaC 'nla
PAGE 2/3 * RCVD AT 11/2712006 11 :35:1 0 AM [Eastern Standard Time] * SVR:RIGHTFAXI9! DNIS:8001 * CSID:4349787214 * DURATION (mm"ss):02.50
FROM :
FAX NO. :
Nov. 27 2006 04:47PM Pi
~Ql1f."
1d/( ed
II fA1f~
REVIEW
Flnmmna . }l)U(J~ham f'rQ!~piUt
OC~Jagazine
From:
P.O. Box 59 · Palmyra, VA 22963
Phone: (434) 591-1000 · Fax: (434) 589-1704
~XL SJu.d4 / )114f_ UJ rrrrd/J
/r
. ~ lwNaMNtA- R~J\rr~-1A)
I
To:
Re:
Number of pages in'cluding cover:
3
Fax: g O!{-- berg --:1Jtf~
. Message:
.1Jw'rw#l~~ ~O~'r-u ~
~. Y1MHA!Vtitelu I~ tfM4 ~~ . ~J V--tf. h.)
~ dM;Wld ~ -fhM~ 1f/Vilo.
1M #td ~. JPrMli. kvwW1 ~a Mfl4
.~ ~-f/ud-, . .
PAGE 1131 RCVD AT 11127120063:20:18 PM [Eastern standard Time] 1 SVR:RIGHTFAX/22 ! DNIS:21481 CSID: 1 DURATION (mm-ss):05.20
',itz;So.;(,s~~~l ~o.,~~.na:.~ :~I~~~.!,~:S~~.Zt~~!~~I~~^S..1 [a~11 p~p~~uiaJSe31"~. 8~OtC'9,~~~ii,~!~~'g:~~~,,,:~!~:~~!~
::":':\';"..')~;:~~.. ',fil::E~:~;~;:~ '.' ~.~ ~.. . f ~< f~~~'".c~J:f
,'i' ,,"" ".'- ~ r:: Ul) ...,Z.Q) .~, .[1 0'<::< ,..J ~ ,~'. l':::I > 'IJ ' f,l;.i. ~:
, . < '0 LQ ~ ... .... .... ~ .,..J bb" ;;S ~ ~. ,Q i!) <h :f <V :a.. '1,~'
.=. .... 3:12'. .9.s g ~.3 8 trJ ~ ~ ~ ".a ~.~ ~ 0''9 i? .t:t:t tt5~'.d' "',b..'~:'
, ,,' 'w.:::.:dil .....:-~'.<fl....:.....'~,~o:it'l"q .'.... jQ.~ ~,~{'l')'fJ ".~.;,~~," "'gl
. l ~, ._ ...... ~,~ ag ~\ t..( Q;.) ~ ~I
~, : ," :g:~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~.' g 25 "l i~''-;' ~, '."; E'-i' ~ , ~ '~olo: Gi':'iS,. E';o ~ ~" ~, .,~ .
. " <, ,Iii Q /j(f >;:~ s::-. E"<i ,& I=i ., <h .:"'ld 0 . ~ bJ;) 0,':;; ..... ....,., 0 (3"
~! ';, l!5'~.""".., /s";~:ig~ tJ)+:l'8' c;:ti~ ,'. ] iil:'"7 . ":'d:' ';d~' tijP\,3':~E ....:':f
, ':IJ' "., rJJ'..~,.:. ,,;,~:.~ "0 '2i"~'" ~ '00' ,S'S ,;,&", ,. ~ "E ,~d i d' i:2,~ ~ O' '1- '". ~ w:
,,' ,"'J; ~ 'Z'" " , ",'(~::E '~~, ]'u" ,:~,;: '..2u~ ~ . ~ (U' J-<,.... 0 ~ a,
,~..: ~:~ ~ g , ~~~.-~ ~,f5~']'~ ~ g ~ Ul'~ ~ g' "g i?~"" -5, l ~ ~ ~'J{ ~'c
~'_.. --0 ~'O. .eo 3:.,;...lo ~1-"l~~t:lot'E( "~ B"5e.odn'..8 o'r; S . :g'6b~'r::: ~']j <\I'
;<;E:,:::;.: - ;~ u. S · oJ, · 0 ~ · ,$ ,8~<S',:~:~ ~'&f;',p 3,.8:~'~~:~i~ ~"1~ (
. '.,t?' ~ ~{ , B...." 0 I.r.J . ~ Io-,"(U ~' o' ~ ol:l '0 /J:. . '...J ., 0.....'
'.11 ',g ~. 0 ~ ~"""~ ~ '~'~'~ ,,~'~ ~ ' :; s. ~ ~] ~.3 ~
',: ~ u ~ u ,,...1 ~ .:..' Q. ~.' :-.. " v .a7..e; III /<I .Ed'~ Ul J;l:i'~;::
, '~.....' t}- ..s 'f -.... 1,1.<. ~ ~."'" ,::9"<'1' \i.. u,~. o.C(l,~ ,;...J :;n
. ,'~" :it ~ >-- (IS bO, .'0' ';1E;l:l ,>:.;::i'.j:!::;....+ _ '..l'l rn j:;
. P.- e ..... &l <:::; ;.::l ~ o' ~ 9. . '-<tl '."l '8' . QJ . ........; <il . '<il 0
'.: ~ r~ ~.:- 'J::';.& N Q. ;>! ;;;:] .... ~,~ ~,-5<. '5j,..trl "'.0 ;s" ,: . 'c ::g
<I. "-,, 0 05 ~' . Q) ~ . "'" ........ Q..... ~. "" ~ '
'~';""",.~' ~ ~ ,a(j . c >r.i ~- ''"0 ~~ ..... .......';"q,' rn. "? 'A,'",
0:1;; ,","'. ~ . ~ ..0' , .::I >:< ;;::l: . "<) 0.,."., ~' "';.:,i:l'
,."..ll';:O.. .0' tt....,j..~ - ~~',':l'~",+>02.o:e..Sl. ~'~<'l'
"l ' ~ t;;: CJ) ,,. '~ ......, Q) ~. ,....., ~ '~r.... . .
'....' (~L~'" . . i4' ' .' "~.~ ib.(), :~' ~ g ; :->:... ''8 Iii.:..:l $ ,'""'" '''@ ~i ~-'Q 'f
, $,: R;j' , . . 'l.l . . 'tl l::: o? 'qJ . ',.:~" 'c: Cl . . N
"," ,': ~ -'~.~ ,:,".: ~ ~.if. ~ .;E' <';l.t:' :50 i;~i;~ ~ ;,~ :e.._ 11 ~,Iii ;,'
. ~.E :0: . .-, ~., 0 Cl "" .<:::; . /A . -0 ,.~ :'<;i. , ~ ;:;: ..... . V;;J '!il' ~.., .
;" ,-..::"t- ''''''~:' , ~:~"fJ'1 ~ ~ u~.)>,.~ cS;p, ::C'f:),\:J lri' 1Jj'g.~..:!e t:: _ 2 ~ ~ Q
.~ ~. l'>" ," Q) 0'= 0" .:..< <=> ~ I\~ - ro <'Ii 0.....,.. 0
~;S1":;:;"ij:~~I~" o~-, o'Q)~' '''''r< ,,",,:;!l'~~r..,~.....,~*,O
i t3 ~ ~" .,",. ~I" ~ ~ '.0 ... ~ 0. ~ \ . " ~ ~I ~,ee ~ 'M ~ r-c 0
:" , \;S. ":' ,~,.1 '.,' .~'~ ;;: ~ 0'0';;' i? <U ro:<~ ~ ;bij,' .', ~'i.a i.J "0' ~. ~ ,_ "dr 2! D,., l1{
I:>' ",';.{\l.. ""- ".. _'" .. '.0 0 lB t:I <'f) ~ CQ .~ $;;:,: ....' ~ rO <'II -..c"- fj ,0>.
,P; ~ ,~ ~". S · ;J:; 5 m · ~ .< * . ~;<>; <.3 _. ~ :2 is r;-, & in ~ ~ ~ ;;;' ~ ~ ~ ~
,", '. . ,
'~i';""; 1.\ ~ ,~'!:\,'\'...(" '~, '''''.'',,' '.:..-', . 1 .
; ..- .'~ ~.o;~1h6::,.p',,,,. ~ '~ ] .m i '0 ';9',"0 >-';g ';:8 1:3 l'1, 0 iii ,$=i"''; O. '"
.~ ~. ,!$.;',~:.~ ;>;,~ Bj~ m'~ 0 ,(;1 T<a' ~ ~;:I' ''''':8 ~ 'E",?;: '~-[ ...-e 'a'
,~.' .'Q,' ,,~'C>"'" ~.g gf ~ ?l. g ~.:~ ,;:;3~..s.... ,'I)' :-e'r:: <'I"~ .~: <s: .0 'Z9
. r7} :!~. ";,~ ~ <l) 1;<:> ~ g""'" ~ :a~., ~ (E' 0, 'S r:; 0 ~ v,..... .::2 '<<1' .'B.~';;:;.."
,.Q .::~' ~..., ~ 8 o".~ ~ ~ o~:: . :i.~ ~ '0 .~<tt 15 'i ~~ ':s ,.:.~:>;g Q.o < ~"~
~~;~, -<.:1 0" ~'-Q:E'61ii,o " .8<;$' .~. F1~oq;; ~"~,~'df >;:
o ~,,~.~ ,e !2 eJ) 0 ~ o. S;,~ E=I!2P ;1, o:t >' ~ 3 0'1 >o,!! 11>';~'io'
~~, o,~ '8 ~.@ oS.s 0 .13,,~ ,4).!:l .' U,:,;a. <'!l, .g,a ~,~ ~ tZl ntCj
',' ,p;.." ~. == ~ :~ j;1 3 '-" 2 <::::I~ "'o..~~,,~ 8; '" ~ '.ts '0 0.., '1ij, a ,: g ',~ i::l , ,.2 ',0:1.
,c,. .~. ~J~}I.S..].'~ ~~~.~. ~~~.:.. 1J ..~:'~i~t'~ .g"~'~::, ~ :i'~ ~ '~",:~,:ltg
. '.... ~ .~, 41 ~ .;r,\ ~ .;; <:s .l;:;' "c: :;:0 ~ O'<i. IJ.> .s, ,"=' ~;;; Q, &' J:I., , Q. t;
">;~.~ ~,~','~",~.' E.'.E'~',!t~..~ 'fJ.':~ :'::{;s ;i"~',,~. ": '8'8;13'; ~I:g 'g'" .~...'~'
'., ~' Z'~"'15^" ;m.ell ~ p, f3 o.@'.t;.,. ~o ....&1 . '.0;1 C"-l (II -5-, .8-':. '~~'
','. .' ~.. ~~.. 'J?':Sl' 'l.> f;:l ~'~ ~ C:.) '13 ~pg,..~ ~ ~. Q\' ~ 'ts, gpr~..~ "06
,,' .-' ~'~ .~ Q ,s .~ g '!:) ,.g 0 ;;;l ./, g,.,;, ~o 'a C,) C"-l.s .~ ,@<d.l ' ~.
. ',' '. ""~q.;. "".d'~..s..t:J .....;s:l:<.fU,. {) li:; ~;19:., ",.Jil .
"i .'~ ~ , ~. F3 0 .::2. '11l':sa s a' ,\ 'gj' "'= :,Ef ;.8 ,,Q,;;c "fi.. I'l .<=l '-:;...;:=, {!;
.,! '~o s 0 :;;::J ~.?:> 0 0 'll=1 ~. 8 j,~, .~ ~' ';>, s 'e,g <u I'l 0";;>.
" Q~:O ~ 0 oS ~ (<"> s'~..;,;~ .~'11J.> . ].~.~ <.-.~. S ~ to d.l ,fl.a~.g,
,; Iioiiol"~ ~"<'~ c..~ ~ .a:r;:';>,':i3 '0 i9 0'44~' 0 ..c:q~.:t ;S'..~ S"C 'gJ
I'; ~ ~ >.~.'tJ '" I":'l .... 0 0 !il rIio 0:::: 8 .s;J, 0...... !) <::; ,Q. i::h....,!:$ 8 'c; s
':.~,:f.;,z ~;~:,::!~i ~.~ ~ .~~~.~ :if. ~:.fi !j. ~ '!:~ ~:i :~'J3.~ j
.~ '~"~~' ~:>>::F, ~jS ~ ~ u S' l.].~'~ "~,:Q ~'~ .~ A '~r Sl ttf,o.if
,,,'o,'~ Q,i3',ei~' ~ bl)% P..~ _:ti."';..o,u.a..~ <<:l~-E.~..s,,s S
: >~.~ " li1<t's f"l~" "'~,.13::::: _6. '" .g'<.":I 'i"15 $.;g,,:> , ~ .9t:l.~ ~ ~ "'=',
." '~R, ';.l::l'o ;>l(\'''l '" fl.~u;e,-B <u ,'.d,) Il.)<~ oJ.) O,+",j) <l),=M
,.. Q . en. . .!':':l U ,:8' ~ ~ ~ ~ <l) ~"~ ~ ;t1? 6) ~ 'l=l 0 us's H 0 \0
r-"I ~ >:;:d. '0 0" o:l {3' ~ ;s:.... l"l .$ "€l 0 ,->. ~ = .~ ~
','i~O' '~ .t:"~ Q., 'Q ~ ~ 0...., Q.o .~,;-~'\$!'.El ~ V> '.P,~ 'g."l:J,:O',g gN
: . '15 r.a ~. 1) _,... m, c ':.0 5h;Q..e' Of) ~:oil. ..... -<;;; B '<0, ~ e.; .,~
':,~' ',z: S M ,~ l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g .~ .'~ ~,~ ;g .g ~ :s::a ~ ~ ~ .s .~
, p..; if.) IJ ~ C"-l 2 S. 1'6'.S 8 8, ~.~ 8..;;8 .8 Jl:s, g;.~.~~
;,..\.,;,.,.
cd WdLl7:l70 900c Lc '(\OH
'OH Xtl.::J
WOd.::J
FROM
FAX NO.
Nov. 27 2006 04:50PM P3
'"
" ,',
~. .'
'1-0
o
VI
~
.c
g
~.
,1?f ~'
-,,(:;
- III
~'E
o OJ"
~':~;<'i._ '
Slz "
<lJ '" .
.... h;
'"
",
-
t:I
III
=
-
It
.'
-B...g;;$;",j<
...'1;l .,g:~"~
Q. "~'-lo-I
.. 0 <l;J~'
;l:,g.p.~
j
EXHIBIT B TO CERTIFICATE
Summary of Statements
Representatives of Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge and McGuireWoods LLP,
bond counsel, appeared before the Authority to explain the proposed plan of financing. No one
appeared in opposition to the proposed bond issue.
-3-
RESOLUTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
OF FLUV ANNA COUNTY, VIRGINIA
AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF UP TO $4,000,000
REVENUE BOND FOR THE BENEFIT OF
WESTMINSTER-CANTERBURY OF THE BLUE RIDGE
WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of Fluvanna County, Virginia, a
political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia ("Authority"), is empowered by the
Industrial Development and Revenue Bond Act, Chapter 49, Title] 5,2, Code of Virginia of
1950, as amended ("Act"), to issue its revenue bonds to promote the welfare of the inhabitants of
the Commonwealth of Virginia by assisting in the acquisition, construction and equipping of
facilities for the residence and care of the aged in order to provide modern and efficient services
to them, in accordance with their special needs and is further empowered to issue its revenue
bonds for the purpose of carrying out its powers:
WHEREAS, the Authority has received a request from Westminster-Canterbury of the
Blue Ridge a non-profit, Virginia nonstock corporation (the "Company"), requesting that the
Authority issue its revenue bond to assist in financing the costs of capital improvements at the
Company's existing residential care retirement facility located at 250 Pantops Mountain Road in
the County of Albemarle, Virginia including without limitation the construction and equipping of
additional cottages at the facility ("Project");
WHEREAS, such assistance will benefit the inhabitants of the County of Fluvanna,
Virginia and the Commonwealth of Virginia, either through the increase of their commerce or
through the promotion of their safety, health, \velfare, convenience or prosperity;
WHEREAS, preliminary plans for the Project have been described to the Authority and a
public hearing has been held as required by Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of] 986,
as amended, ("Code") and Section 15.2-4906 of the Act;
WHEREAS, the Company has represented that the estimated cost of the acqUlsltlOn,
construction, renovation and equipping of the Project and all expenses of issue will require an
issue of revenue bonds in the aggregate principal amount not to exceed $4,000,000;
WHEREAS, (a) no member of the Board of Directors of the Authority is an officer or
employee of the County of Fluvanna, Virginia, (b) each member has, before entering upon his
duties during his or her present term of office, taken and subscribed to the oath prescribed by
Section 49-1 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended and (c) at the time of their
appointments and at all times thereafter, including the date hereof, all of the members of the
Board of Directors of the Authority have satisfied the residency requirements of the Act; and
WHEREAS, no member of the Board of Directors of the Authority has any personal
interest or business interest in the Company, the bond, or any of the transactions contemplated
therein or has otherwise engaged in conduct prohibited under the Conflict of Interests Act
Chapter 31, Title 2.2 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended (the "Conflict of Interests
Act") in connection with this resolution or an) other official action of the Authority in
connection therewith.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY OF FLUV ANNA COUNTY, VIRGINIA:
1. It is hereby found and determined that the acquisition, construction, renovation
and equipping of the Project will be in the public interest and will promote the commerce, safety,
health, welfare, convenience or prosperity of the Commonwealth of Virginia, the County of
Fluvanna, Virginia, and their citizens.
2. The Authority hereby agrees to assist the Company in financing the acquisition,
construction, renovation and equipping of the Project by undertaking the issuance of its revenue
bond in an amount not to exceed $4,000,000 upon terms and conditions mutually agreeable to
the Authority and the Company. The bond will be issued pursuant to documents satisfactory to
the Authority. The bond may be issued in one or more series at one time or from time to time.
3. It having been represented to the Authority that it is necessary to proceed
immediately with the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Project, and the planning
therefor, the Authority agrees that the Company may proceed with plans for the Project, enter
into contracts for land, construction, materials and equipment for the Project, and take such other
steps as it may deem appropriate in connection with the Project, provided, however, that nothing
in this resolution shall be deemed to authorize the Company to obligate the Authority without its
consent in each instance to the payment of any moneys or the performance of any acts in
connection \vith the Project. The Authority agrees that the Company may be reimbursed from
the proceeds of the bonds for all expenditures and costs so incurred by it, provided such
expenditures and costs are properly reimbursable under the Act and applicable federal laws.
4. At the request of the Company, the Authority approves McGuireWoods LLP,
Richmond, Virginia, as Bond Counsel in connection with the issuance of the bond.
5. All costs and expenses in connection with the financing and the acqUISItIOn,
construction, renovation and equipping of the Project, including the fees and expenses of Bond
Counsel and Authority Counsel, shall be paid by the Company or, to the extent permitted by
applicable law, from the proceeds of the bond. If for any reason such bond is not issued, it is
understood that all such expenses shall be paid by the Company and that the Authority shall have
no responsibility therefor.
6. In adopting this resolution the Authority intends to take "official action" toward
the issuance of the bond and to evidence its "official intent" to reimburse from the proceeds of
the bond any expenditures paid by the Company to finance the acquisition, construction,
renovation and equipping of the Project and the planning therefor before the issuance of the
bond, all within the meaning of regulations issued by the Internal Revenue Service pursuant to
Sections 103 and 141 through 150 and related sections of the Code.
7. The Authority designates the Bond as a "qualified tax-exempt obligation" eligible
for the exception from the disallowance of the deduction of interest by financial institutions
allocable to the cost of carrying tax-exempt obligations in accordance with the provisions of
Section 265(b)(3) of the Code. The Authority does not reasonably anticipate issuing more than
$10,000,000 in qualified tax-exempt obligations during calendar year 2006 and the Authority
')
-L-
will not designate more than $10,000,000 of qualified tax-exempt obligations pursuant to such
Section 265(b )(3).
8. The Authority recommends that the Boards of Supervisors of the Counties of
Fluvanna and Albemarle, Virginia approve the issuance of the bond. No bond may be issued
pursuant to this resolution until such time as the issuance of the bond has been approved by such
Boards of Supervisors.
9. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
-3-
, .
CERTIFICA TE
The undersigned Secretary of the Industrial Development Authority of Fluvanna County,
Virginia ("Authority") certifies that the foregoing is a true, correct and complete copy of a
resolution adopted by a majority of the Directors of the Authority present and voting at a meeting
duly called and held on November 29, 2006, in accordance with law, and that such resolution has
not been repealed, revoked, rescinded or amended but is in full force and effect on this date.
WITNESS the following signature and seal of the Authority, this 29th day of November,
2006.
0~tP::
Secretary of the Industrial Deve opment Authority
of Fluvanna County, Virginia
[SEAL]
FISCAL IMP ACT STATEMENT
FOR PROPOSED BOND FINANCING
Date: November 29, 2006
To the Boards of Supervisors
of the County of Albemarle, Virginia
Applicant:
Facility:
Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge
Residential Retirement Facility
1.
2.
Maximum amount of financing sought.
Estimated taxable value of the f~lcility's real property to
be constructed in the locality.
$4,000,000
$3,500,000
3.
Estimated real property tax per year using present tax
rates.
$ 800,000 (30,000)*
4.
Estimated personal property tax per year using present
tax rates.
$ 25,000
5.
Estimated merchants' capital tax per year using present
tax rates.
$ 0
6. (a) Estimated dollar value per year of goods that will be
purchased from Virginia companies within the locality.
$2,000,000 (100,000)*
(b) Estimated dollar value per year of goods that will be
purchased from non-Virginia companies within the
locality.
(c) Estimated dollar value per year of services that will be
purchased from Virginia companies within the locality.
$1,000,000 (50,000)*
$ 200,000 (10,000)*
(d) Estimated dollar value per year of services that will be
purchased from non-Virginia companies within the
locality.
$ 100,000 (5,000)*
7.
Estimated number of regular employees on year round
basis.
8.
260
$ 30,000
A verage annual salary per employee.
~.~
~/~ CS-'
Chairman, Industrial Development Authority
of Fluvanna County, Virginia
* ( ) reflects the impact of the new project
\4279691 I
At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia,
held on the 13th day of December, 2006, the following members of the Board of Supervisors
were recorded as present:
PRESENT:
On
motion
by
seconded
by
, the attached Resolution was adopted by a majority of the
members of the Board of Supervisors by a roll call vote, the votes being recorded as follows:
MEMBER
VOTE
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Revenue Sharing - Fiscal Year 2007
AGENDA DATE:
December 13, 2006
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
SU BJ ECT/PROPOSALlREQU EST:
Approval of resolution allowing the County to
participate in VDOT's Revenue Sharing program
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION: X
INFORMATION:
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Tucker, Foley, Davis, Graham, Benish, Wade
ATTACHMENTS: Yes
REVIEWED BY:
LEGAL REVIEW: Yes
BACKGROUND:
VDOT's Revenue Sharing program provides the opportunity for the County to receive an additional $1,000,000 for road
improvements. The County has participated in this Program since 1988; however, the program has changed significantly
this year. The most significant change to the program is a new tiered approach to prioritizing applications and awarding
funds, which is oriented to encouraging a larger match of funds from the locality than the previous dollar-for-dollar match
under the old program requirements. An explanation of the changes to the Revenue Sharing Program and, specifically, the
tier concept can be found in the attached letter from VDOT (Attachment A).
STRATEGIC PLAN:
Goal 3: Develop Policies and Infrastructure Improvements to Address the County's Growing Needs.
DISCUSSION:
The Revenue Sharing Program is a competitive funding program with a total statewide funding of $15 million for FY07. In
order to provide the most competitive application, the County will need to provide a greater amount of match than in
previous years to qualify under the Tier One category. Tier One projects will be funded first before proceeding to other
Tiers and the priority of funding will be based on the amount of local match above a dollar-for-dollar match. Specifically,
VDOT's policy for Tier One states:
Tier One provides funding when the governing body commits more than $1 million in local funds for a $1 million match. The
locality's total requests are considered for tier one funding. If requests exceed funds available, tier one requests will be
prioritized based on the amount of local funds committed above the matching funds. Please note, local matching funds
must be available for use by April 1, and those in excess of $1 million match, must be spent prior to receiving state
matching funds. The use of state Revenue Sharing funds requires that state laws, policies, and procedures must be
followed.
The Revenue Sharing Program is expected to be very competitive this year under the new guidelines. Staff is
recommending providing a $1.5 million match for the Meadow Creek Parkway. This will allow the County's request to meet
the Tier One criteria and make the request more competitive. Since this is the first year under the new program criteria,
there is little history or guidance from VDOT on what other localities will be financially committing to the program, or how
competitive a $1.5 million local match will be.
If funded, this would result in an additional $2.5 million for the Meadow Creek Parkway. VDOT Residency staff has
recommended applying FY 07 Revenue Sharing funds to the Meadow Creek Parkway project to ensure that sufficient
funds are available to cover the current estimated funding shortfall and ensure the project stays on schedule for
construction. To date, the County has authorized VDOT to move prior revenue sharing funds and prior secondary fund
allocations from the Free State Road, Old Ivy Road and Proffit Road projects to cover some of the shortfall (no funds have
AGENDA TITLE:
Revenue Sharing - Fiscal Year 2007
December 13, 2006
Page 2
been moved from Jarman's Gap Road or Georgetown Road at this time). As a result, approximately $2.4 million of
previously allocated Revenue Sharing funds from Old Ivy Road and Proffit Road will be transferred to the Meadow Creek
Parkway ($1.2 million County share and VDOT match). However, there is recent concern at the VDOT Residency Office
that there is still a shortfall of $2.0 to $2.5 million in funding for the Parkway based on the current project cost estimate. In
early November, it appeared that approximately $4.0 million of the estimated $4.6 million shortfall had been covered. But
last week the Residency staff was advised that a total of $1.5 million thou~ht to be available to transfer to MCP, may not be
available for transfer. VDOT staff will be available at the December 13 meeting to provide further information on the
status of funding. Providing Revenue Sharing Funds to the Meadow Creek Parkway project will ensure sufficient funds will
be available to cover this project. Any funds from other sources or prior allocations from other projects which may become
available in the future could then be transferred to the other high priority local projects such as Jarman's Gap Road and
Georgetown Road.
BUDGET IMPACT:
The County's match of $1.0 million has been allocated in the Capital Improvement Program. The $500,000 is available
from funds allocated to the Transportation Program in the CIP. The $1.5 million will leverage an additional $1.0 million
in VDOT funds to be used toward high priority road improvements.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the resolution to participate in Revenue Sharing for FY 2007 found
on Attachment B.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: VDOT Revenue Sharinq Letter
Attachment B: Resolution
06.178
Attachment A
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DAVID S. EKERN, P.E.
COMMISSIONER
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1.IOl h\ST B1~Of\[) STHEET
RICllt..10ND. VIRCINlli :~3.::' 19<'000
October 13,2006
County Administrators/City & Town Managers
RE: Revenue Sharing Program for FY 2007
On October 11, 2006, the Commonwealth Transportation Board approved the new guidelines for
the Revenue Sharing Program. These guidelines are based on changes made to the Code of
Virginia, under Section 33.1-23.05, during the 2006 regular session of the General Assembly.
This new section allows all counties, as well as cities and towns, maintaining their roadways to
apply for Revenue Sharing Funds up to $1 million. It also sets out priorities/tiers for funding.
The total program's budget is $15 million for FY07.
The most significant change with the new program is a tiered approach to providing funds. All
requests in the preceding tier must be funded before requests in the next tier are considered.
Applications will be prioritized based on the following:
· Tier one provides funding when the goveming body commits more than $1 million in local
funds for a $1 million match. The locality's total requests are considered for tier one
funding. If requests exceed funds available, tier one requests will be prioritized based on the
amount of local funds committed above the matching funds. Please note, local matching
funds must be available for use by April 151 and those in excess of the $1 million match, must
be spent prior to receiving state matching funds. The use of state Revenue Sharing funds
requires that state laws, policies, and procedures must be followed.
· Tier two provides funding when the project is administered by the locality. Local
administration must include all remaining phases of the project.
· Tier t1u'ee provides funding to projects when the allocation will accelerate an existing project
in the Six-Year Improvement Program or the locality's capital plan.
· Tier four projects include any other requests that have a matching allocation from the
goveming body.
OOVEARSOF
TRANSPORTATION EXCELLENCE
1 906 200 6
County Administrators, City and Town Managers
October 13, 2006
Page Two
The current program guidelines and application fonns can be reviewed at
hllP://\\'\\'\V.vir~iniadot.or~/bllsincss/local-assistancc.asp. If your locality wishes to participate in
the program for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2007, the following items must be provided by
December 22. 2006, to the Local Assistance Division:
· A resolution of the County Board of Supervisors or City/Town Council outlining their
request to participate and support of the potential projects identified for possible funding
from the program (sample on the website),
· A Detailed Designation of Funds Form for each project, which gIves detailed project
infonnation (on the website), and
· A SU/JI/JIwy Designation of Funds Form which summarizes and prioritizes the list of eligible
projects (on the website).
Each locality will need to work directly with their Residency Administrator, Urban Program
Manager or other designated VDOT representative in selecting eligible projects, developing
estimates and submitting the necessary paperwork. A list of managers is also included in the
Revenue Sharing Guide.
The Department looks forward to working with you on this during the upcoming months. If you
have questions about the program changes this year, you may reach me at 804-786-2745 or by
email at MichacI.Estcs((/\VDOT.vin;inia.gov.
---~
Mi ael A. Estes, P.E.
Director, Local Assistance Division
WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING
RESOLUTION TO PARTlCPATE IN
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
REVENUE SHARING PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2007
WHEREAS, the County of Albemarle desires to submit an application for allocation of
funds of up to $1.5 million through the Virginia Department of Transportation Fiscal Year 2006/07,
Revenue Sharing Program; and
WHEREAS, $1.5 million of these funds are requested to fund the Meadow Creek
Parkway for new construction between Melbourne Road and 0.0466 miles north Norfolk Southern
Railway; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
hereby requests that the application for $1.5 million from the Virginia Department of
Transportation Revenue Sharing Program be approved.
I, Ella W. Carey. do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true and correct copy of a
Resolution duly adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County by a vote of six to
zero. recorded below, at a meeting held on December 13, 2006.
-A ! (( Dr) (lftAA (/ .
Clerk; Board of County Supervisors'
Mr. Boyd
Mr. Domer
Mr. Rooker
Mr. Slutzky
Ms. Thomas
Mr. Wyant
Aye Nay
y
y
y
y
y
y
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Resolution: Proposed Workforce Housing
Legislation
AGENDA DATE:
December 13, 2006
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
SU BJ ECT/PROPOSALlREQUEST:
Prince William County has requested the Board
endorse a proposal to enhance existing enabling
authority regarding housing assistance to local
employees
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION: X
INFORMATION:
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Tucker, Foley, Davis, Bowman
ATTACHMENTS: Yes
LEGAL REVIEW: Yes
REVIEWED BY: , (
r,
/
BACKGROUND:
Prince William County is seeking legislation to amend the Virginia Code by adding ~ 15.2-542, which would grant broader
and less restricted authority than current enabling statutes for the County Executive form of government to provide grants,
loans and other assistance for county and school board employees, as well as employees of local constitutional officers, to
purchase or rent residences, for use as the employee's principal residence, within the county. Prince William County
requests that the Board of Supervisors support this proposed change (Attachment A), so that Prince William County can
determine if its request for legislation should apply to the County Executive form of government or solely to Prince William
County.
STRATEGIC PLAN:
Goal 1: Enhance the Quality of Life for all Albemarle County Residents.
DISCUSSION:
Prince William County is seeking to amend the Virginia Code by adding ~ 15.2-542, which would grant broader and less
restricted authority to the County Executive form of government than existing legislation under Virginia Code ~ 15.2-958.2.
To date, Albemarle County has not adopted an ordinance under the existing Code section. The proposed legislation would
only augment existing enabling authority and not require the County to implement such a program. Enabling authority
similar to the proposed Code section already exists for the County Manager form of government (~ 15.2-720.1). The full
texts of these current and proposed Code sections are available in Attachment B.
Prince William County, like Albemarle, operates under the County Executive form of government. Thus, any legislative
amendments to the County Executive form of government will apply to both Albemarle and Prince William counties. Prince
William County will pursue this proposed legislation regardless of the Board of Supervisors' support, but if the Board does
not support the attached resolution, Prince William County will change the legislation to apply solely to Prince William
County. Prince William County prefers to draft this legislation to apply to the County Executive form of government and
requests the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors' support through adopting the attached resolution.
BUDGET IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact created by this resolution or the proposed legislation, if approved. The requested legislation
only grants enabling authority and does not require the adoption of an ordinance or creation of a program in a county.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the resolution (Attachment A). If the resolution is approved, staff will work with Prince
William County to monitor the proposed changes during the 2007 General Assembly session.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A - Resolution: Proposed Workforce Housing Legislation
Attachment B - Virginia Code ~ 15.2-958.2, ~ 15.2-720.1 and proposed ~ 15,2-542
06.180
RESOLUTION TO SUPPORT AMENDMENTS
TO EXISTING WORKFORCE HOUSING LEGISLATION
WHEREAS, Prince William County desires to request legislation to amend the
Virginia Code by adding ~ 15.2-542 to enable counties under the County Executive form
of government broader and less restricted authority to provide housing assistance to
local employees; and
WHEREAS, proposed Virginia Code ~ 15.2-542 would apply to the County
Executive form of Government; and
WHEREAS, Albemarle County, like Prince William County, operates under the
County Executive form of government; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Virginia Code ~ 15.2-542 would broaden existing
enabling authority granted in Virginia Code ~ 15.2-958.2; and
WHEREAS, the County of Albemarle generally supports the expansion of
enabling authority for localities; and
WHEREAS, the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors adopted a Strategic
Objective stating: "By June 30, 2010, working in partnership with others, increase
affordable housing opportunities for those who work and/or live in Albemarle County."
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of
Albemarle County does hereby support amending the Virginia Code by adding ~ 15.2-
542 to allow counties under the County Executive form of government to provide funds,
other than state funds, to provide grants, loans and other assistance for county and
school board employees, as well as employees of local constitutional officers, to
purchase or rent residences, for use as the employee's principal residence, within the
county.
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true and correct
copy of a Resolution duly adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County by a
vote of six to zero, as recorded below, at a meeting h~ld on December 13, 2006.
"
,
Mr. Boyd
Mr. Dorrier
Mr. Rooker
Mr. Slutzky
Ms. Thomas
Mr. Wyant
Ave Nav
y
y
y
y
y
y
/ \ I ("
'I ;
/ I , Y
t=:~ :),f (t~ {~/ . (c Lt.. ~
Clerk, Board of County superviso2:)
Attachment B
Va Code 915.2-958.2,915.2-720.1 and proposed 9 15.2-542
Current Va Code section that applies to all localities:
S 15.2-958.2. Grants for home ownership.
In order to ensure its competitiveness as an employer, a locality may, by ordinance, provide for the use of
funds, other than state funds, to provide home-ownership grants to employees of the locality, employees
of the school board and employees of constitutional officers, to purchase their primary residences in the
locality. The ordinance shall require that each grant be approved by the local governing body by ordinance
advertised on its regular agenda and that individual grants not exceed $5,000 per employee, nor lifetime
cumulative grants exceed $5,000 per employee. The ordinance may establish such other terms and
conditions to ensure the integrity of the home-ownership grant program.
Current Code that applies to County Manaaer form of aovernment:
S 15.2-720.1. Employee benefits; residence in county.
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the county board, in order to ensure its competitiveness as an
employer, may by ordinance provide for the use of funds, other than state funds, to provide grants for
county and school board employees, as well as employees of local constitutional officers, to purchase or
rent residences, for use as the employee's principal residence, within the county
Proposed Leaislation that would applv to County Executive form of aovernment:
S 15.2-542. Employee benefits; residence in county.
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the county board, in order to ensure its competitiveness as an
employer, may by ordinance provide for the use of funds, other than state funds, to provide grants, loans and
other assistance for county and school board employees, as well as employees of local constitutional officers,
to purchase or rent residences, for use as the employee's principal residence, within the county.
In the County of Albemarle
By resolution of the governing body adopted December 13,2006
The following VDOT Form AiVJ-4.3 is hereby attached and incorporated as part of the governing body's resolution for changes
in the secondary system of state highways.
A Copy Testee Signed (County Official):
Form AM-4,3 ( 11/28/2005)
Asset Management Division
Report of Changes in the Secondary System of State Highways
Project/Subdivision
Crozet Glen Subdivision
Type of Change: Addition
The following additions to the Secondary System of State Highways. pursuant to the statutory provision or provisions cited, are
hereby requested. the right of way for which, including additional easements for drainage as required, is guaranteed:
Reason for Change: Addition, Secondary System, New subdivision street
Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: ~33.1-229
Route Number andlor Street Name
· Lanetown Way, State Route Number 1387
- -
· Description: From: Intersection Rt. 684 Lanetown Road
To: Intersection Gala Court Rt. 1388
A distance of: 0.03 miles.
Right of Way Record: Filed with the Albemarle County Clerks Office on 5/3/2004, Deed Book 2740 Page 692-704. with a
width of 50'.
· Lanetown Way, State Route Number 1387
__.n __
· Description: From: Intersection Gala Court Rt. 1388
To: Intersection Stayman Court Rt. 1389
A distance of: 0.05 miles.
Right of Way Record: Filed with the Albemarle County Clerks Office on 5/3/2004. Deed Book 2740 Page 692-704, with a
width of 40',
· Lanetown Way, State Route Number 1387
- - ---. --- -- - - - - -~ -- -
· Description: From: Intersection Stayman Court Rt. 1389
To: End State Maintenance
A distance of: 0.17 miles.
Right of Way Record: Filed with the Albemarle County Clerks Office on 5/3/2004, Deed Book 2740 Page 692-704. with a
width of 40'.
· Gala Court, State Route Numbe." 1388
.
Description:
--- -
From: Intersection Rt. 1387 Lanetown Way
To: Cui De Sac
A distance of: 0.03 miles
Right of Way Record: Filed with the Albemarle County Clerks Office on 5/30/2004. Deed Book 2740 Page 692-704, with a
width of 40'.
Page I of2
Form AM-4.3 ( 11/28/2005)
Asset Management Division
Report of Changes in the Secondary System of State Highways
. Stayman Court, State Route Number 1389
. Description: From: Intersection Rt. 1387 Lanetown Way
To: Cui De Sac
A distance of: 0,04 miles
Right of Way Record: Filed with the Albemarle County Clerks Office on 5/30/2004, Deed Book 2740 Page 692-704. with a
width of 40'.
County of Albemarle, Date of Resolution: December 13, 2006 Page 2 of2
The Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, in regular meeting on the
6th day of December 2006, adopted the following resolution:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the street(s) in Crozet Glen Subdivision, described on the attached Additions
Form LA-5(A) dated December 13, 2006, fully incorporated herein by reference, is shown on plats
recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Albemarle County, Virqinia; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has
advised the Board that the street(s) meetthe requirements established by the Subdivision Street
Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors
requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the street(s) in Crozet Glen
Subdivision, as described on the attached Additions Form LA-5(A) dated December 13, 2006, to
the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to S33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the
Department's Subdivision Street Requirements; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-
way, as described, exclusive of any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage as described
on the recorded plats; and
FURTHER RESOLVED that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident
Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation.
* * * * *
Recorded vote:
Moved by: Sally Thomas
Seconded by: Lindsay Dorrier
Yeas: Ken Boyd, Lindsay Dorrier, Dennis Rooker, David Slutzky, Sally Thomas,
David Wyant
Nays: None
Absent: None
\
I
A Copy Teste:
\ /
I , I
I! " ( . , ,.. .
/ /. (,-. .' L. , (L L ~~. \
~11a W. Carey, Clerk, CMC \
Board of County Supervisot'~~)
The road(s) described on Additions Form AM-4.3 is:
1) Lanetown Way (State Route 1387) from the intersection of Route 684 (Lanetown
Road) to the intersection of Route 1388 (Gala Court), as shown on plat recorded
05/03/2004 in the office the Clerk of Circuit Court of Albemarle County in Deed
Book 2740, pages 692-704, with a 50-foot right-of-way width, for a length of 0.03
miles.
2) Lanetown Way (State Route 1387) from the intersection of Route 1388 (Gala
Court) to the intersection of Route 1389 (Stayman Court), as shown on plat
recorded 05/03/2004 in the office the Clerk of Circuit Court of Albemarle County in
Deed Book 2740, pages 692-704, with a 40-foot right-of-way width, for a length of
0.05 miles.
3) Lanetown Way (State Route 1387) from the intersection of Route 1389 (Stayman
Court) to the end of state maintenance, as shown on plat recorded 05/03/2004 in
the office the Clerk of Circuit Court of Albemarle County in Deed Book 2740, pages
692-704, with a 40-foot right-of-way width, for a length of 0.17 miles.
4) Gala Court (State Route 1388) from the intersection of Route 1387 (Lanetown
Way) to the cul-de-sac, as shown on plat recorded 05/03/2004 in the office the
Clerk of Circuit Court of Albemarle County in Deed Book 2740, pages 692-704, with
a 40-foot right-of-way width, for a length of 0.03 miles.
5) Stayman Court (State Route 1389) from the intersection of Route 1387 (Lanetown
Way) to the cul-de-sac, as shown on plat recorded 05/03/2004 in the office the
Clerk of Circuit Court of Albemarle County in Deed Book 2740, pages 692-704, with
a 40-foot right-of-way width, for a length of 0.04 miles.
Total Mileage - 0.32
In the County of Albemarle
By resolution of the governing body adopted December 13,2006
The following "''DOT Form A,t/-4.3 is hereby attached and incorporated as part of the governing body's resolution for changes
in the secondary system of state highways. A' '~ ... "
,//1 IlL' / (!t~.
A Copy Testee Signed (County Official): {/"'-. [
Form AM-4.3 ( 11f28f2005)
Asset Management Division
Report of Changes in the Secondary System of State Highways
Project/Subdivision
Country Oaks
Type of Change: Addition
The following additions to the Secondary System of State Highways. pursuant to the statutory provision or provisions cited. are
hereby requested, the right of way for which, including additional easements for drainage as required, is guaranteed:
Reason for Change: Addition, Secondary System, New subdivision street
Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: ~33.1-229
Route Number and/or Street Name
. Susan Drive, State Route Number 1614
- - -- -- - -- -- -- - --- - -- ---
. Description: From: Intersection Rt743 Earlyville Rd.
To: Cui De Sac
A distance of: 0.18 miles.
Right of Way Record: Filed with the Albemarle County Clerks Office on 10/29/2003, Deed Book 2627 Page 250-254, with a
width of 40',
Page 1 of 1
The Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, in regular meeting on the
6th day of December 2006, adopted the following resolution:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the street(s) in Country Oaks Subdivision described on the attached
Additions Form LA-5(A) dated December 13, 2006, fully incorporated herein by reference, is
shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Albemarle County, Virqinia;
and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has
advised the Board that the street(s) meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street
Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors
requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the street(s) in Country Oaks
Subdivision as described on the attached Additions Form LA-5(A) dated December 13, 2006, to
the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to S33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the
Department's Subdivision Street Requirements; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-
way, as described, exclusive of any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage as described
on the recorded plats; and
FURTHER RESOLVED that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident
Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation.
*****
Recorded vote:
Moved by: Sally Thomas
Seconded by: Lindsay Dorrier
Yeas: Ken Boyd, Lindsay Dorrier, Dennis Rooker, David Slutzky, Sally Thomas,
David Wyant
Nays: None
Absent: None
f~1
A Copy Teste:
\
\
___:l.,~/--/,.. J
{ ;:
;'
,-C LG
Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC I
Board of County Supervisors ,7"
The road(s) described on Additions Form AM-4.3 is:
1 ) Susan Drive (State Route 1614) from the intersection of Route 743 (Earlysville
Road) to the cul-de-sac, as shown on plat recorded 10/29/2003 in the office the
Clerk of Circuit Court of Albemarle County in Deed Book 2627, pages 250-254, with
a 40-foot right-of-way width, for a length of 0.18 miles.
Total Mileage - 0.18
In the County of Albemarle
By resolution of the governing body adopted December 13,2006
The following VDOT Form AJJ-4.3 is hereby attached and incorporated as part of the governing body's resolution for changes
in the secondary system of state highways.
A Copy Testee Siglled (COUllty Official):
Form AM-4.3 ( 11/28/2005)
Asset Management Division
,
Report of Changes in the Secondary System of State Hlg
ProjectlS ubdivision
Marshall Subdivision
Type of Change: Addition
The following additions to the Secondary System of State Highways. pursuant to the statutory provision or provisions cited, are
hereby requested, the right of way for which. including additional easements for drainage as required. is guaranteed:
Reason for Change: Addition, Secondary System, New subdivision street
Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: ~33.1-229
Route Number and/or Street Name
· Harrison Forest Lane, State Route Number 1119
- - -
!II Description: From: Intersection Rt. 640 Gilbert Station Rd.
To: Cui De Sac
A distance of: 0.05 miles.
Right of Way Record: Filed with the Albemarle County Clerks Office on 4/30/2004, Deed Book 2740 Page 278-291, with a
width of 40;.
Page 1 of 1
The Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, in regular meeting on the
6th day of December 2006, adopted the following resolution:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the street(s) in Marshall Subdivision described on the attached Additions
Form LA-5(A) dated December 13, 2006, fully incorporated herein by reference, is shown on plats
recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Albemarle County, Virqinia; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has
advised the Board that the street(s) meetthe requirements established by the Subdivision Street
Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors
requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the street(s) in Marshall Subdivision
as described on the attached Additions Form LA-5(A) dated December 13, 2006, to the
secondary system of state highways, pursuant to S33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the
Department's Subdivision Street Requirements; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-
way, as described, exclusive of any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage as described
on the recorded plats; and
FURTHER RESOLVED that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident
Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation.
* * * * *
Recorded vote:
Moved by: Sally Thomas
Seconded by: Lindsay Dorrier
Yeas: Ken Boyd, Lindsay Dorrier, Dennis Rooker, David Slutzky, Sally Thomas,
David Wyant
Nays: None
Absent: None
A Copy Teste:
,
((
lei . Carey, Clerk, CMC
Board of County Supervi?orp
/ )
"-. "
The road(s) described on Additions Form AM-4.3 is:
1 ) Harrison Forest Lane (State Route 1119) from the intersection of Route 640
(Gilbert Station Road) to the cul-de-sac, as shown on plat recorded 04/30/2004 in
the office the Clerk of Circuit Court of Albemarle County in Deed Book 2740, pages
278-291, with a 40-foot right-of-way width, for a length of 0.05 miles.
Total Mileage - 0.05
In the County of Albemarle
By resolution of the governing body adopted December 13,2006
The following VDOT Form A1JJ-4.3 is hereby attached and incorporated as part of the governing body's resolution for changes
in the secondary system of state highways.
A Copy T estee
Siglled (Coullty Official):
-/51! CUW C~~
( tJ
Form AM-4.3 (11/28/2005)
Asset Management Division
Report of Changes in the Secondary System of State Highways
Project/Subdivision
Grayrock Iv
Type of Change: Addition
The following additions to the Secondary System of State Highways, pursuant to the statutory provision or provisions cited. are
hereby requested, the right of way for which, including additional easements for drainage as required, is guaranteed:
Reason for Change: Addition, Secondary System, New subdivision street
Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: ~33.1-229
Route Number andlor Street Name
· Grayrock Drive, State Route Number 1381
.
d
Description:
From: Intersection Rt. 1385 Russet Rd.
To: Intersection Rt.1386 Braeburn Street
A distance of: 0,20 miles
Right of Way Record: Filed with the Albemarle County Clerks Office on 10/20/2003, Deed Book 2619 Page 624-632. with a
width of 50'.
· Grayrock Drive, State Route Number 1381
-- -- - -- - -- --
· Description: From: Intersection Rt.1386 Braeburn Street
To: Existing Rt. 1381 Grayrock Dr.
A distance of: 0.00 miles.
Right of Way Record: Filed with the Albemarle County Clerks Office on 10/20/2003, Deed Book 2619 Page 624-632, with a
width of 50',
· Braeburn Street, State Route Number 1386
· Description: From: Intersection Rt.1381 Grayrock Drive
To: Intersection Rt.1385 Russet Rd.
A distance of: 0.15 miles.
Right of Way Record: Filed with the Albemarle County Clerks Office on 10/20/2003, Deed Book 2619 Page 624--632, with a
width of 50'.
Page 1 of 1
The Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, in regular meeting on the
6th day of December 2006, adopted the following resolution:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the street(s) in Grayrock Subdivision, Phase IV, described on the attached
Additions Form LA-5(A) dated December 13, 2006, fully incorporated herein by reference, is
shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Albemarle County, Virqinia;
and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has
advised the Board that the street(s) meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street
Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors
requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the street(s) in Grayrock Subdivision,
Phase IV, as described on the attached Additions Form LA-5(A) dated December 13, 2006, to the
secondary system of state highways, pursuant to S33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the
Department's Subdivision Street Requirements; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-
way, as described, exclusive of any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage as described
on the recorded plats; and
FURTHER RESOLVED that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident
Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation.
*****
Recorded vote:
Moved by: Sally Thomas
Seconded by: Lindsay Dorrier
Yeas: Ken Boyd, Lindsay Dorrier, Dennis Rooker, David Slutzky, Sally Thomas,
David Wyant
Nays: None
Absent: None
A Copy Teste:
r
/
/ / / Ie L ( (/l[/C \
Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC \
Board of County superviso~)
The road(s) described on Additions Form AM-4.3 is:
1) Gravrock Drive (State Route 1381) from the intersection of Route 1385 (Russet
Road) to the intersection of Route 1386 (Braeburn Street), as shown on plat
recorded 10/20/2003 in the office the Clerk of Circuit Court of Albemarle County in
Deed Book 2619, pages 624-632, with a 50-foot right-of-way width, for a length of
0.20 miles.
2) Gravrock Drive (State Route 1381) from the intersection of Route 1386 (Braeburn
Street) to the intersection of Route 1381 (Grayrock Drive), as shown on plat
recorded 10/20/2003 in the office the Clerk of Circuit Court of Albemarle County in
Deed Book 2619, pages 624-632, with a 50-foot right-of-way width, for a length of
0.00 miles.
3) Braeburn Street (State Route 1386) from the intersection of Route 1381 (Grayrock
Drive) to the intersection of Route 1385 (Russet Road), as shown on plat recorded
10/20/2003 in the office the Clerk of Circuit Court of Albemarle County in Deed
Book 2619, pages 624-632, with a 50-foot right-of-way width, for a length of 0.15
miles.
Total Mileage - 0.35
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Crozet Crossings Housing Trust Fund
AGENDA DATE:
December 13, 2006
SU BJ ECT IPROPOSALlREQU EST:
2006 Annual Report
ACTION: INFORMATION:
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Mr. Tucker; Ms. White; Mr. White
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION: INFORMATION: X
LEGAL REVIEW: Yes
ATTACHMENTS: yes------
!
I
I
.i'/~fV I
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND: /
The Crozet Crossings Housing Trust Fund was established in 1994 via an agreem~nt between the County of Albemarle,
the Charlottesville Housing Foundation (CHF), and the Albemarle Housing Improvement Program (AHIP) as a means of
holding notes on houses in Crozet Crossings and recovering funds upon the resale of houses in Crozet Crossings. It was
required to be established as a condition of the Virginia Department of Community Development's approval of the
Community Development Block Grant for the Crozet Crossings project. The Trust Fund is responsible for reusing
recovered funds for housing projects that benefit low- and moderate-income households. The Fund is managed by five
trustees and staffed by the Chief of Housing.
This report is provided as information to the Board of Supervisors to summarize the activity over the past five years and to
present the current financial status of the fund. No action is requested for the report. However, next spring the trustees
plan to recommend future projects that can be supported by available funds and the Board will be asked to make the
necessary appropriations at that time.
STRATEGIC PLAN:
Enhance the Quality of Life for all Albemarle County Residents
DISCUSSION:
The Trustees for the Crozet Crossings Housing Trust Fund met on November 16, 2006 to review the financial position of
the Fund and consider issuing a Notice of Funds Available (NOFA) for available funds. The Fund is in a very good financial
position with over $330,000 in cash. The attached summary shows the funds condition for each year since it was
established. In 2002/03, the Fund made a loan to AHIP in the amount of $90,000 to support the construction of five new
houses in Esmont as a part of a community revitalization project. Since that time, the Fund has received repayments,
recapture, and interest earnings of almost $270,000. With the recent repayment of $50,000 from AHIP, the Fund's cash
balance is $332,009.75.
In addition, the Fund has receivables estimated to be $533,466 with all but $40,000 (balance of AHIP's loan) representing
fourteen loans of $269,720 and equity recapture of $223,746. These loans and the recapture of equity are due and
payable only upon the sale or refinancing of the property and will be forgiven if the owners continue to maintain their
properties as their primary residence for thirty years from the date of the loan.
The Trustees also directed staff to proceed with the issuance of a NOFA for at least $300,000. The NOFA will specify
prOjects that are eligible for funding and establish eligibility requirements for applIcatIon.
households with incomes at or below 80% of the area median income.
All funds must benefit those
BUDGET IMPACT:
None, funding comes from restricted program income.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
This report on the Crozet Crossings Housing Trust Fund is for information purposes only at this time.
ATTACHMENTS
A - Crozet Crossinqs Financial Summary
06.177
Attachment A
CROZET CROSSING TRUST FUND
Financial Statement
November 2006
Cash of hand
$332,009.75
Receivables (total of 15
Loan
Deferred Loans
Recapture (1)
TOTAL Receivables
loans; 14 deferred)
$ 40,000.00
$269,720.00
$223,746.00
$533,466.00
Total Assets
$865,475.75
(1) Recapture based on current assessed values with no consideration for potential
selling price or capital improvements by the owner.
Fiscal Year Interest Recapture Trust Receipts Lgl Services Loans FY Total Rolling Total
Initial Deposit 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,000.00 5,000.00
1994/95 215.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 215.65 5,215.65
1995/96 187.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 187.96 5,403.61
1996-97 187.01 19,856.80 82.81 0.00 20,126.62 25,530.23
1997/98 741.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 741.31 26,271.54
1998/99 1,328.37 0.00 0.00 24,599.91
1999/00 3,179.99 33,331.66 2.973.17 0.00 39,484.82 64,084.73
2000/01 4,298.02 2,122.89 29.700.00 0.00 36,120.91 100,205.64
2001/02 2,655.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 2,655.00 102,860.64
2002/03 1,107.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 90,000.00 13,967.89
2003/04 338.98 46,228.93 26.630.00 0.00 73,197.91 87,165.80
2004/05 3,131.62 58,174.68 88,762.00 62.00 150,006.30 237,172.10
2005/06 10,708.68 13,276.00 17,200.00 0.00 41,184.68 278,356.78
2006/07** 3,652.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,652.97 282,009.75
Total 31,732.81 172,990.96 162,347.98 62.00 90,000.00
** Not complete fiscal year
The following guidelines will be used:
15 MINUTES ARE ALLOTED FOR THIS PORTION OF THE AGENDA
EACH SPEAKER IS ALLOTTED 3 MINUTES.
PLEASE GIVE ANY WRITTEN STATEMENTS TO THE CLERK.
--~- 0 \,) V\
sh-c') VI ~
10
11
12
13
14
15
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Public Hearing - Red Hill Community Well -
Request to amend the Jurisdictional Area Boundary
for the Albemarle County Service Authority
AGENDA DATE:
December 13, 2006
ACTION: X
INFORMATION:
SU BJ ECT IPROPOSALlREQU EST:
To amend the Jurisdictional Area boundary for the
Albemarle County Service Authority to provide water
service to Tax Map 87B, Parcels 4, 4A, 6, 6A, 6B, 7,
7 A, 8, and 10, located on Taylors Gap Road (Route
710) and Tax Map 87B, Parcels 9, 10A, 11, 12, 60,
60A, 60B, and 61 located on Red Hill School Road
(Route 760).
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS: Yes
REVIEWED BY:
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Tucker, Foley, Davis, Cilimberg, Benish; Swales
~ :'
LEGAL REVIEW: Yes
BACKGROUND:
County staff has been working with the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) since 2003 on a study to find a
replacement water supply in the Red Hill area. The replacement water supply is needed due to a major groundwater
contamination incident originating at the Trading Post on Route 29. To this date, 11 wells have been contaminated by
gasoline and 7 of these have had carbon filtration units installed, some for many years. DEQ has already expended over
$1 million on investigations, remediation, and maintaining carbon filtration units. To date 4,400 gallons of gasoline and 4
million gallons of contaminated groundwater have been extracted from the ground. Although the contaminant plume
appears to have stabilized, the complete cleanup of the site is not expected in the foreseeable future due to the extent of
contaminated groundwater. DEQ continues to be concerned that a permanent, reliable water supply needs to be provided
for the impacted properties and those still at risk for contamination.
The leaking tank case summary is outlined below:
. December 16, 1988 an anonymous complaint was received at DEQ of gasoline taste in a private water well,
resulting in the initiation of a petroleum release case, PC89-0679.
. In 1990, an Underground Storage Tank (UST) was removed at the Trading Post. A report of contaminated soil
and free product in the UST basin was made as a result of the unearthing of the tank.
. Numerous residential water wells reported and tested positive for hydrocarbon contamination from 1993 through
2002.
. Contaminated wells were offered to be fitted with carbon filtration units (CFU), and most residents accepted. DEQ
is paying for the ongoing maintenance of the CFU's.
. A second petroleum release occurred in 1998, but was not reported until 2002. PC01-6021 was opened as the
second petroleum release from the Trading Post.
· Dual-phase Soil Vapor Extraction and a groundwater pump-and-treat system was initiated at the Trading Post in
1998 to remediate contamination.
. A third known petroleum release at the Trading Post occurred in 2002, initiating case PC03-6034.
· Ongoing groundwater remediation is taking place at the Trading Post site; CFU's maintained by DEQ.
Albemarle County's involvement is summarized below:
· At its March 5, 2003 meeting, the Board authorized County staff to work with DEQ to facilitate a long-term water
supply solution.
· DEQ and the County held a public meeting at Red Hill School on April 22, 2003 to inform the public about the
situation and seek input on whether a replacement water supply would be supported.
· On December 10,2003, the Board authorized the County Executive to sign an interagency agreement with DEQ.
The agreement allowed the County to procure consultant services to study and recommend a replacement water
supply, with all study costs to be reimbursed by DEQ.
· A Request for Proposals was developed in the fall of 2003, and after a competitive process, Golder Associates
AGENDA TITLE:
Red Hill Community Well - Request to amend the Jurisdictional Area Boundary for the Albemarle County
Service Authority
December 13, 2006
Page 2
was chosen to conduct the study. The study involves evaluating the feasibility of various water supply
configurations: individual replacement wells, shared wells, or a community water supply. The work is divided into
two phases. Phase 1 is a preliminary groundwater investigation, and Phase 2 involves more detailed geologic and
engineering work to analyze particular water supply options. Phase 1 was completed in the summer of 2004.
. On August 11, 2004, based upon the results of Phase 1 of the study and staff recommendation, the Board
authorized staff to proceed with Phase 2 of the study, with the selected water supply configuration of a medium
size community water well to serve the 11 impacted properties plus additional properties immediately surrounding
andlor down gradient from the contaminant plume that may be impacted in the future.
. DEQ and the County held a public meeting at Red Hill School on December 13, 2004 to present the results of
Phase 1 of the study, the options for developing a community water supply system, and the upcoming Phase 2
study.
. Phase 2 of the study continued through 2005, which included negotiations with landowners to establish a location
for exploratory water well drilling.
. On May 9, 2006 DEQ sent an open letter to the residents in the immediate vicinity of the Trading Post advising
that a location for exploratory water well drilling had been secured on the Oakey property.
. On August 31, 2006 DEQ sent an open letter to the residents in the immediate vicinity of the Trading Post
advising that a successful exploratory water well had been drilled on the Oakey property, and that the County,
Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority, Albemarle County Service Authority, and Albemarle County Schools were
coordinating the potential establishment and maintenance of a community water system.
. On November 1, 2006 the Board of Supervisors took action to approve a Public Hearing to be held December 13,
2006, concerning amending the Albemarle County Service Authority jurisdictional area boundary for the Red Hill
area.
A new well referred to as Red Hill School Well NO.5 (Well #5) was drilled to the east of the affected area in July, 2006 and
a 48-hour drawdown test was performed. The well was drilled to a depth of 500 feet and is constructed as a Class liB
public water supply well as required by Virginia Department of Health's Waterworks Regulations. Significant water-
producing fractures were encountered at depths of 380-385 feet, and 420-430 feet, in addition to a minor water-bearing
fracture at 73 feet. Water quality analyses indicate that the water source complies with all state and federal water quality
standards.
Water levels were monitored before, during and after the drawdown test in Well #5 and a monitoring well located
approximately 320 feet northwest. The flow rate during the test was maintained at 29 to 31 gpm. The monitoring well
showed no drawdown during the aquifer test. The water level at the beginning of the drawdown test in Well #5 was at a
depth of 34 feet and exhibited drawdown of 105 feet at the conclusion of the 48 hour test. Upon shut down of the
pumping phase of the test, Well #5 exhibited relatively rapid recharge. Based on the measured drawdown rate and the
rapid recovery of the producing well, Golder & Associates concludes Well #5 can be pumped for sustained periods at 29
gpm, which is equivalent to 41,760 gallons per day. This source capacity far exceeds the estimate of 9 gpm (12,960
gallons per day) which was estimated as the minimum flow rate necessary to supply the school and residents that are
located within the boundaries of the current jurisdictional area boundary request.
STRATEGIC PLAN:
Goal 2: Protect the County's Natural Resources.
DISCUSSION:
The subject property for this request is not within a Development Area. The Comprehensive Plan provides the following
guidance concerning water service in the Rural area:
General Principle: Discourage the utilization of central water andlor sewer systems or the extensions of public water and
sewer into the rural Area except in the cases where public health and safety are at issue. Rural Area development will be
served by individual water and septic systems only (central water facilities are considered wells, springs, or other systems
capable of serving three or more connections).
Recommendation: New central water systems in the Rural Area shall be strongly discouraged except for solving potable
water and/or health and safety problems. Any new central systems approved due to potable water and/or health and safety
problems must meet ACSA standards and not allow residential densities to increase beyond the density achievable with
individual on-site facilities.
AGENDA TITLE:
Red Hill Community Well - Request to amend the Jurisdictional Area Boundary for the Albemarle County
Service Authority
December 13, 2006
Page 3
Staff opinion is that the existing groundwater contamination poses a significant health and safety issue and a water system
is needed in the area to provide safe potable water to existing parcels. Therefore, this request is consistent with the intent
of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan provides the following guidance concerning the designation of the
ACSAjurisdictional area boundary: Only allow changes in jurisdictional areas outside of designated Development Areas in
cases where the property is: (1) adjacent to existing lines; and (2) public health andlor safety is in danger.
As outlined above, there is a definite health and safety issue. Due to the location and extent of the threat (which includes
the Red Hill Elementary School) this request is consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan even though the
location is not adjacent to existing lines. Staff finds the central well system is the only alternative to adequately address the
problem.
BUDGET IMPACT:
The community well and water system will be owned by RWSA and operated by ACSA, who will bear the financial
impact of the long term operational cost. The Virginia Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) fund is being
utilized by DEQ for this project, and the current case has access to a total of $1 million. A portion of these funds are
being used and will continue to be used by DEQ for remediation of the Trading Post site and long-term monitoring of
groundwater. These funds will also be used by DEQ to develop the well and distribution system and connect
households to the system. DEQ has committed that any funds remaining will be provided to the ACSA to subsidize the
operation of the system so that customer costs are in keeping with the rest of the County. While this will alleviate the
burden of operating this small system for a period of time, it can be assumed that the system will operate at a financial
loss in the long-term to maintain a reasonable customer cost.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends amending the jurisdictional area map to allow for water only designation for the properties Tax Map 87B,
Parcels 4, 4A, 6, 6A, 6B, 7, 7 A, 8, and 10, located on Taylors Gap Road (Route 710) and Tax Map 87B, Parcels 9, 10A, 11,
12,60, 60A, 60B, and 61 located on Red Hill School Road (Route 760). These properties have been identified by DEQ as
having contaminated wells or continue to be at risk for contamination in the future. Staff recommends that the community
well only serve the residentslparcels whose private wells are contaminated or identified by DEQ to be at risk for
contamination. These properties do not include parcels in the Southern Hills Subdivision, which in the past was considered
to be at risk of contamination. According to the most recent opinion of DEQ, while the Southern Hills Subdivision is
certainly downgradient of the contaminant plume, DEQ does not consider the wells in that area to be at risk at this time
based upon the continued monitoring of a sentinel well located on the south side of South Branch - this well has remained
free of contamination to date, indicating that the stream may be acting as a local groundwater divide.
ATTACHMENTS
A - Location Map
06.179
PLEASE SIGN BELOW IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK ON
Public Hearina: RED HILL COMMUNITY WELL
fhe f:1I0~ing guidelines will'be used for~his PUbli:earing: ------
- EACH SPEAKER IS ALLOTTED 3 MINUTES.
( INDIVIDUALS CANNOT RELINQUISH THEIR 3 MINUTES TO ANOTHER
~ SPEAKER.
INDIVIDUALS CAN ONLY SIGN UP ONE PERSON TO SPEAK.
PLEASE GIVE ANY WRITTEN STATEMENTS TO THE CLERK.
I
I-
I
,-
l
I
I
I
NAME (Please print clearly) PHONE NUMBER/ADDRESS (Optional)
1 ~ '{ \ <Sl'{X\ \'^.e~~\Y\CA-, (4J)~)C;7/- D. 0 I ~
2 h<:Lt\ K ~ ('kss irlC (43-+)1/1-;<01 d ::fi'~~ ~-L i1 ~\.~y)l ~~ 1\
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
~~~
I
~!'II
~ ~I
r3 ~)
- ,.----4 IG If---
o I;" I
. - !
I ~ rr------ 'f-
I I , --- ~
/1 ..r'------- ~.I 0 fJ cJ - 2
/ ~P' ~ &
/ Rrtillel7 0, 'a'J1dfS G~,
_____ / v , / ,. \} \\1 \ m:<l"~~~ ~
~_ -'C SJIf ' r j h G ;!:: b I\b ~ ,~l! ~~~":: ~~,' , "
.A ~ 10 '. ~,=i(~'0 ~~---
_ . ~ I s1 ~ mt ~i'--,- ~~'J~~~~~~~ l
y 00 '~l~ .,~'" ''''''~, "-
_ ~ \ h ~ ;;\ -< ~~~~"~~ i
J:: 1J= I I ~ \P~ 00 ~ ~ ~~~~~~~ I ~
\J I [,; U w %~ ~~'" ~
Q) I " ,o.:\JI. \. ~ ~
a: b;' = ' .. ,.0 a ~- J 0
--=<~ ,00 -:r 00 · - /F'I
~ I "-~~;--'-'~ ~ -" ~ / ~ I
~ Z'e,. _. ~ -.: ~ ro
w "tv. n ". u
2: ___ 'l! I 00 ~~ /'120 c
c -----lj r-D '-o04s> "==/3)' / ~ ~
o ______ -l'c ~ ~,,_ -,~... .2
~ \ 0_ \ Co ~ , ,~ \ .~~ ~
.3 ~,.r" ~ A ~\; -~~~ 1-
<( '" -,--. _;v_' ~ '\ 1:
,... . ,~-,-,,'n ) / '~&
+-' .' _.,'U _ / " e
C ".10....""" : - -" p
Q) r;-'~ , ~, ' j/ \Y'"'~ \, ,,/ \> 'I ,I 1t~,
E c' , "'. 't: -,' ~ i 1$1 I \)
.r:: of : ; , .; , · : T ~~ I1i iM 1 --rf-- \~',/" ",j,l/ /110 1~~CE(l)
() . _ ~-,,.. ~ ,-1-; + -Jl.! ' -
CO G -A..m ~~fl!l!;
<(~ L] ;, ~ ft ~ --f- {~ ~. ~ : i ~~.. ~ /\ l ! oV I
I;~ "I; '" 11; P -, - ;; ~ (ll ~ ~ I
L...I ~ :! 1'1 ,,-t Sl ~ t ~ I~ l I
I\-:-j-- ~~" ~ . i-.~ ~ II 5 II I
'-'" , , _, _ _ '-I{' ,~...'-1.11 ~ 1
L 1I~.:$.J "1f ~ : I :-r: t~~ - =.J ~'\Ji l ~ j/\\\" .' ~~-
12~ ~ "t:7 ,~ -----1'
1_ . . '-. G i ~ .-t
_, '-. I I \ /z......O~
"" I'L..- 0 l \
<" -j / .
~\~ ~
+-'
C
Q)
E
\J
C
Q)
E
<(
CO
Q)
l....
<(
CO
C
.0
+-'
o
~ J
J
\J
Q)
if)
o
Q...
o
l....
0...
.
~-
~
--
\J
a:
o
o
.c.
()
(f)
a
~
I
\J
<1>
-rr
o
(0
=:;..
~
~
1."'::--1
--
--
'--.
z
c:
o
~ "5
U) (0 0
==_.5 TI 2i:-
ev E~g
~ (0 = tI)'-
'U 1:: I ~
~ 8 ~feJ
c: = (l) ii
'E ~ Cu. ~
(0 ::> <( -
1:: 't5/~ 5}
o "t:l"t:l
" .x C 0
_ UI ro -
:5 ~~- ~
~~:~-~r .:
ev co.s::::.
:e .ev ~ I-
ev too c
a. ev (J) 0
a. (L '.0
e 0:2 Q-
a. j,;;.. I- "-
a. ~
D~ ~'
::::" ro
~ (f
~\
"
C
G>
CJ
~
Good Evening. My name is Frank J. Messina. My daughter Kristen spoke earlier on behalf of her Mother/
my wife, Ann Messina, who was unable to be here tonight due to the failing health of her mother. My wife and I
moved in to our newly constructed home in North Garden with our two small children back in July 1990. At the
time we believed we were living every young couples dream. By 1991 however we realized a portion of that
"Dream" had become a nightmare. Our family's potable water supply, our well, was deemed unsafe. Not just for
human consumption but for use in general. The source of our problem was leaking underground storage tanks
located at the Trading Post, a nearby country store. With the assistance of, and gratitude for, authorities having
jurisdiction over these matters at the time we received a "Temporary Alternative" for our water woes. Fifteen
years later however, and now ten (10) more nearby residences, it saddens me to say we, and many others, are still
reliant on "Temporary Water Systems."
I would like to take this opportunity to support the Board moving forward with their plans to amend the
Jurisdictional Boundary Area of the Albemarle County Service Authority. It is my belief and hope this proposal will
bring about a permanent solution to a significant community health issue facing the North Garden area regarding
potable water. I would also, one day soon, like to wake up from this 15 year long water nightmare.
Thank you and good night.
Kindest Regards,
Frank J. Messina
Good Evening Ladies and Gentlemen,
My name is Kristen Messina and I am here tonight to read a statement on behalf of my
mother who is out of town caring for her mother who is in the hospital
She writes,
"Good evening, my name is Ann Messina. My family and I are residences of
North Garden, Our home is one of II that have been affected by the leaking underground
storage tanks at the Trading Post gas station. We have lived with a temporary alternate
water supply for our contaminated water for over 15 years. Our sense of security
continues to be of concern. I appreciate the support, cooperation, expertise and leadership
of and between Albemarle County Staff, Albemarle County Water Authority, The Health
Department, and The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality in working toward a
permanent solution,
· I support the adoption of this proposed amendment to the Albemarle County
Water Authority Jurisdictional area.
· I support the intent of the Comprehensive Plan but I appreciate its flexibility that
allows for the creation of this small community well, when it is necessary to
provide a permanent water supply for those wells affected and those at risk of
contamination.
Thank you for listen,
Ann Messina
.
.
.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
ZMA 2005-0007 Haden Place
II STAFF:
, REBECCA RAGSDALE
I
I AGENDA DATE:
i December 13,2006
S U BJ ECT IPROPOSALlRE QU EST:
Haden Place is a request to rezone 669 acres from
R2 Residential to NMD Neighborhood Model District
for 34 residential units (20 detached, 14 attached)
ACTION: X
INFORMATION:
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Cilimberg, Echols, Ragsdale
i CONSENT AGENDA:
I ACTION: INFORMATION:
LEGAL REVIEW: NO
i
I ATTACHMENTS:
YES
OWNERIAPPLlCANT PURCHASER:
Wendell W. Gibson of Gibson Homes is the owner/applicant with Kelly Strickland of Dominion
Development Resources (formerly Rivanna Engineering & Surveying) as the consulting engineer.
BACKGROUND:
On October 11, 2006, the Board of Supervisors held a public hearing on this rezoning request
and voted to defer the item Discussion and issues identified by the Board during consideration of
this item included
· Provision of an interconnection to Summerford Lane in adjoining Old Trail
· Deficiencies of roads serving the site, including Haden and Killdeer Lanes and Jarman's
Gap Road
· Timing of Construction of the Affordable Housing Units
· Adequacy of Cash Proffers
DISCUSSION:
The applicant has requested that this item be scheduled before the Board and submitted a
response letter to each item the Board discussed at the October meeting, along with revised
proffers and an amendment to the application plan These items were received on December 1,
2006 (Attachments A, B, and C) Under the prior Board deferral action. this item was not re-
advertised as it was a continuation of the proposed project advertised for the October 11, 2006
Board hearing.
The new proffers and changes to the application plan were submitted later than the deadlines
established in the Board's adopted policy regarding submission of materials for zoning
applications. The applicant did not advise staff that they would be submitting new information until
after the item was already placed on the December 13, 2006 Board meeting agenda. Since the
applicant is proposing changes to proffers, it is legally required that a new public hearing be
advertised reflecting these changes.
Staff has not had time to thoroughly review the new information for form and content but offers
the following preliminary comments below,
f' "
'"j (, .......
,v ...)
. Provision of an interconnection to Summerford Lane in adjoining Old Trail
.
With the revised proffers and addendum Sheet A11 to the application plan submitted December
1, 2006, the applicant now proposes to construct the connection from Haden Place to
Summerford Lane, which is off-site across the adjoining property in Old Trail. The plan and
proffers reviewed at the October 11, 2006 Board meeting proposed that this interconnection be
constructed to the Haden Place property line only. Staff is supportive of this connection, but has
not had adequate review time to fully evaluate the proffers and plan changes.
. Deficiencies of roads serving the site, including Haden and Killdeer Lanes and
Jarman's Gap Road
The revised proffers the applicant has submitted no longer include off-site improvements to
Killdeer for pavement widening nor a vehicular road connection to Killdeer Lane. The applicant
has indicated that they are suggesting this as a change they are willing to make to the plans to
respond to neighbor concerns regarding Killdeer Lane Haden Lane and Killdeer Lane, along with
the intersection of Killdeer Lane to Jarman's Gap Road, are inadequate roadways to serve
additional traffic. With the previous application discussed at the Board's October 11, 2006 public
hearing, the applicant proposed a connector road from Haden Lane to Killdeer Lane and off-site
pavement widening on both Haden and Killdeer Lanes These are the minimum improvements
necessary to accommodate traffic from the Haden Place development. VDOT will not allow
additional traffic on Killdeer Lane until the intersection improvements are made at Jarman's Gap
Road, Connections from Old Trail to Haden or Killdeer Lanes have also been prohibited until
those roads are improved to handle the additional traffic. Staff is not supportive of the proposal to
no longer provide off-site improvements to Killdeer Lane and to no longer provide the vehicular
interconnection, as this would not establish an interconnected street grid. The applicant has not
revised the cash proffer amount offered to mitigate transportation impacts, but has provided
further information regarding cash value of improvements that are offered in the proffers.
(Attachment A)
.
. Timing of Construction of the Affordable Housing Units
The applicant has added a proffer to provide phasing of affordable units with construction of the
market rate units proposed in the project. The applicant proposes that units be phased, based on
pre-qualified buyers, with construction of the town house units in the project. Staff cannot
comment on this proffer at this time since there has not been adequate review time to consult
with the Housing Director and other reviewers. As stated previously, in order for the new proffers
to be approved, another public hearing is required.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
The new information submitted cannot be acted on since a public hearing is required, The
proffers, application plan, and code of development as submitted for the October 11, 2006 public
hearing can be acted on for approval or denial. If the Board wants to consider the changes
offered by the applicant, a new public hearing should be set and properly advertised.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Letter dated November 29,2006 from J. Kelly Strickland of Dominion Development
Resources
B. Revised Proffers for ZMA 2005-007 Haden Place, dated December 1, 2006
C. Sheet A 11, 12/01/06 Haden Place Plan Amendment
.
~DS
! Dominion
, Development
Resources. LLC
Attachment A
172 South Pantops Drive
Charlottesville. VA 22911
-",t~. . Ik~
, . -'J ----1,1-
"t ~rs ,
{:Cts '
434.979.8121 (p)
434.979,1681 (f)
DDRV A.com
November 2l), 2006
Mr. Dennis S, RookeL Chaim1an
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
401 Mclntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Re: Haden Place Rezoning Application (ZMA 2(0)-OO()7)
Dear Mr. Rooker~
At your regular Board meeting on October 11, Mr. Gibson's proposal to rezone 6.7 -acres in Crozet to a
r ~ ~
Neighborhood Model District was presented to your Board in a public hearing. Although the application came
Afore you with a Staffrecommendatio~ of approv~l andunanimous support frO~1 the Planning Commission,
~ere were several issues that arose dunng your delrberatIOns whlch led to Mr. Glbson's request for a deferral.
Haden Place is scheduled to come back before your Board on December 13, and the purpose of this letter is to
address the concerns that were discussed on October 1 1.
1. Connectivity to Ballard Fields and Old Trail neighborhoods:
Beights Development Corporation has provided Mr. Gibson an af,'Teement in writing stating that the land
will be provided for a connection to Summerford Lane ifMr. Gibson will provide all ofthe construction
necessary for said connection. Mr. Gibson will proffer to build this offsite connection to Summerford Lane.
') Deficiencies of Haden Lane:
In addition to proffering a second entrance with offsite improvements to Summerford Lane, improvements
to the existing Haden Lane have been proposed to the satisfaction of the County Engineer and the Virginia
Department of Transportation.
3. Deficiencies of Jarman's Gap Road:
It is important to note that this development is being proposed in close proximity to Jarman's Gap Road,
which is second on the County's priority list (behind the Meadowcreek Parkway and ahead of Georgetown
Road) for improvements. This means that practically every other development project, whether or not
rezonings are involved, is happening on substandard roads that are not prioritized for any improvements.
Eighty-two thousand dollars is proffered toward improvements to J am1an Gap Road. This is the first (and
. only) proffer that we are aware of that has bccn made toward this road project to date.
~,
,
,
,)
Dominion
Development
Resources, LLC
172 South Pantops Drive
Charlottesville, VA 2291.1
434.979.8121 (p
434.979.1681 (f)
DDRVA.com
4. Defficiencies of Killdeer Lane:
Several residents on Killdeer Lane and the adjoining owner of the Ballard Fields parcel have asked that no
improvements be made to Killdeer Lane. VDOT and the County Engineer have also urged that no
additional traffic should be allowed on Killdeer Lane until the site distance is improved at its intersection
with Jarm[ill' s Gap Road. Mr. Gibson is proposing that no ofIsite improvements shall be made on Killdeer
Lane and that vehicular access to Haden Place be limited to the Summerford Lane connection and Haden
Lane. The County Engineer has expressed a desire for a potential future vehicular interparcel connection to
the west and County Staff and members of the Board have expressed a desire for pedestrian and bicycle
connections to Killdeer Lane. Mr. Gibson has agreed to provide these connections as well as the potential
for a future vehicular cormection.
5. Timing of Affordable Units:
Mr. Gibson is proposing that the 6 affordable cottages shown on the application plan shall be built at the
same time as the 14 townhomes on Haden Place. To accomplish this, Mr. Gibson is proffering that at least
2 of the affordable units shall be under constmction (or completed) at the same time that each of the 3 .
townhome blocks is under constmction.
6. Cash Proffer Value:
The cash value of Mr. Gibson's profIers is equal to $ 397,000 or $14,1 78 per market rate unit.
This value was computed in the following manner:
Cash Proffer for mitigation of traffic impacts
Cash Value for offsite improvements to Haden Lane
Cash Value for offsite construction of Summerford Lane connection
Cash Value for contribution of affordable single family detached lots
$ 82,000
$ 32,000
$ 25,000
$ ;58.000
Total Cash Value of Haden Place proffers
$ 397.000
The fair market value of one affordable, single family detached lot in Haden Place is $90,000 and the cost to
construct a 1,200 square foot cottage on said lot is $ ] 44,000 which creates a fair market value for each
cottage of $ 234,000. Because the proffered sales price of said units shall not exceed $191,000, the sale
price of the lots must be reduced by a minimum of $ 43,000. This burden is unique to the Haden Place
application plan, where the entire 15% affordability requirement (6 units) are being proffered as "for sale"
single family detached products. Other developments which have proffered accessory rental units actually
increase the sale price of the product.
.
'(' ,- At
ILl......., <-
piC,J
,!> I D ..
C,C ~!> om Inion
,<:' ,,0 D
r::(;"........:.~ / - evelopment
~~/'" R
esourGe~, LLC
172 South Pantops Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22911
434.979.8121 (P)
434.979,1681 (f)
DDRVA.com
7. .'It's a Wonderful I>Ian, hut..."
Mr. Slutzky macle a strong argument on October 1 j in favor of supporting "'good plans in the gro'vvth areas".
Mrs. Thomas made an argument against that policy for this particular plan. 1 encourage the Board to follow
a unifoTIl1 policy ofrevicwing applications throughout the Coumy. allowing that policy to evolve in a
manner that creates i~ir markets. sustainable grow1h. adequate funding. and direction for all our citizens.
Please consider these points when Mr. Gibson comes back before you on December 13.
Sincerely.
(W~/l )" / / ///111
/4!--h-~/~
/' / /
1 (/~
u J
J. Kellv Strickland
.omi~ion Development Resources. LLC
~72 South Pantops Drive
Charlottesville. VA 22911
Cc: Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
Rebecca Ragsdale. Senior Planner
Wendell Gibson
.
(; ,
\/~,~~
.
.
e
Attadlmcnl B
PI-offer For-m
Date:
(Ic'!"her~) ")(1111)
IZc'viSJol1S I (I/():,/Oh
1"/OI/O()
ZMA:
2(1():"-()()(i7
1'a:\ Map aud Parcel J'l<umhers: )).Ill) ami )hJi
S),()l) '\cres [(I be rezoned hom Ii ^) [(, NMr> I Nel!!hhorl1lll'cl Model DIstrict)
111 accordance wltb the Appl1calioll !'Ian litteel Haden Place' , elated Se[ltemher 4. JO()()
And prepared hI' DomInion Devel()[lment Res()urces. LLC
Pursuant to Section 33.3 of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance, the owner, or its duly
authorized agent, hereby voluntarily proffers the conditions listed below which shall be applied to
the property, if rezoned. These conditions arc proffered as a part of the requested rezoning and it is
al,Tfeed that: (1) the rezoning itself gives rise tel the need for the conditions: and (2) such conditions
have a reasonable relation to the rezoning request.
1) Construction of Off-Site Improvements: As a condition of final subdivision plat or final
site plan approval for any development within Haden Place (as depicted on the Application
Plan), the Applicant shall design and construct at its sole expense the following:
a. Haden Lane Road 'Widening: Haden Lane. from the southern boundary of Haden
Place to J annans Gap Road. shall be widened to a minimum pavement width of 18'
and shoulders and ditches shall be installed to the extent allowed within the existing
right-of-way. The improvements shall be desi6'11ed and constructed to the satisfaction
of the County Engineer.
b. Killdeer Lane Improvements: As shown on the addendum dated 12/01/06, full
frontage improvements, including curb. gutter, sidewalk, planting strip, and street
trees shall be provided for the 6 proposed lots that front on Killdeer Lane. Vehicular
access from Haden Lane to Killdeer Lane shall be prohibited; however, pedestrian
and bicycle access shall be provided and a future vehicular connection shall be made
available at the request of Albemarle County.
c Stormwater Drainage to Powell's Creek: The Owner shall not request that the
County issue a building pennit within 1-1aden Place prior to the construction or
bonding of an off-site storn1water drainage system to Powell's Creek in general
accord to that shown on the General Development Plan.
Construction of offsite improvements shall be completed, according to t}1e approved site
plan, no later than 12 months after approval of the first subdivisiun plat or site plan
within Haden Place,
\"; C') .!
Haden Place
1'1\, C;] F"nll
P,-,. T... 1 n-t~
.
2) lntcrparccl connection to Summerford Lane:
Final location for dedication ofthc inter-parcel connection with Ballard Fields will be
detennined as a condition of first subdi vision plat or first site plan approval for any
development within I-laden Place. Upon the request of Albcmarle County, the Owner shall
desib'11 and construct at its sole expense the inter-parcel vehicular connection to Summerford
Lane. Said construction shall be completed as desib'11ed and approved by Albemarle County,
no later than 12 months after approval of the final subdivision plat or final site plan approval
for lots within Blocks C, D, E, F, or G as shown on the General Development Plan.
3) Cash Proffers:
The Owner shall contribute a total of $82,000 cash for the purpose of mitigating traffic
impacts from the development. The cash contribution shall be used only for the purpose of
funding transportation projects identified in the County's Capital Improvements Pro!:,'Tam
within the Community of Crozet. The cash contribution shall be paid in increments of
$3200 for each detached market rate unit and $2,700 for each market rate attached unit, prior
to or at the time of issuance of the building permit for each unit. Ifthis cash contribution has
not been exhausted by the County for the stated purpose within ten (10) years from the date
of the last payment of the contribution, all unexpended funds shall be applied to project(s) .
identified in the County's Capital Improvements Program within the Community of Crozet.
4) Affordable Housing:
The Owner shall provide six (6) "for sale" residential units of affordable housing in Haden
Place, identified as units 20, 21, 22, 27, 28, and 29 on the Application Plan. The Owner shall
convey the responsibility of constructing the affordable units to any subsequent purchaser of
the subject property. The current Owner or subsequent Owner shall create units affordable to
households with incomes less than 80% of the area median income, such that housing costs
consisting of principal, interest, real estate taxes and homeowner's insurance (PITI) do not
exceed 30% of the gross household income. The Albemarle County Office of Housing or its
designee shall approve all purchasers of these units. The Owner/builder shall provide the
County or its desib'11ee a period of 180 days to identify and pre-qualify an eligible purchaser
for the affordable units. The 180-day period shall commence upon written notice from the
Owner that the units will be available for sale. This notice shall not be given more than 120
days prior to anticipated receipt ofthe certificate of occupancy. Ifthe County or its designee
does not provide a qualified purchase:- during this initial I80-day period, the Owner shall
have the right to sell the unites) without any restriction on sales price or income of purchaser.
.
,~ r ~-.I
\ .Io()\
\./ "
Haden Place
Pro ffer form
Tl_ i) ~.r')
.
.
e
5) Timing of Affordable Housing: Ifpre-qualiiled buyers arc availahlc, ~ll least 2 affordable
umts shall be under construction or built at the timl' thaI thc first block oJlownhomes is
completecl If'pre-qualifled buyers are (\vailable. a1 least 4 oftht. affordable units shall he
under construction or huil1 at the timc that the second block of townhomes is completed. And
ifDre-qualified huyers are available, all of the afi(Jr(Jablc units shall be built or uncler
construction at the time that the last block ()f !ownhomes IS completed.
5) Historic Resources: As a conclltion oithe first preliminary subdivision plat or preliminary
site plan approval for any development withm Haden Place, the Owner shall provide a
reconnaissance level survey perf01111ed by an architectural historian or other qualified
individuaL 10 adequately provide an archIval record ofthe existing homestead. The survey
shall meet the requirements of the Virginia Department of Historic Resources
Reconnaissance Survey Fielcl F 01111 , and results shall he included in the Haden Place Code of
Development.
6) Final Grading Plan: For any subdivision not requiring a site development plan, the Owner
shall submit a Final Grading Plan 10 the satisfaction of the County Engineer. The Owner
shall obtain approval of the Final Grading Plan by the County Engineer before the first final
subdivision plat or site plan is approved within Haden Place, The Owner shall not request
that a Certificate of Occupancy be issuecl for a dwelling unit on a lot if the County Engineer
has determined the lot b'Tading is not consistent with the approved b'Tading plans.
Signature of Owner.
t:# 4/ ~
IL~IJ [) ~LL C,j b. f.;cvi)
Printed Name of Owner
/'/
/,;7) - 0/- t:?
Date
Wendell W. Gibson, President
Wendell W. Gibson. Inc.
:' i
, i
Haden Place
Pi, ci leT F\);.m
TJ" 'T-, ') r,.{' J
I
~
"G:)
o
<--"'1
*,
~. r;g~8B ~~~~
(tJl, (~;::~[R /ll)>en'
? Z-l> I OJCUl--l) 0G'l)>S::
lJl , - /ll, < en /ll G'l
en )> --I s:: --I )> < en lJl ,'-- en
\ ~Q \ 2i/llOZ, '5:)>O:I
___n_______'____ \ ~ ": I ~ ~ h ~ ~ i g is ~ ~
--------------- ----" > 0 /ll < OJ () 5 0 '0 lJl ~ 0 [H
~ ""~""'" ............... > 2 Rl 0 [H m OJ <.) 0 OJ
--....... ~-.""-'~',,, , ~ I F lJl 9J Q <) ~ ~ CD
· " " en} po , () _ )> en
. ~" "" )> /ll)>" := G'l '5:
. ""'- . ' , " 0 Z en 0 en en
~~O' ----" '. .':!' en. en Z '"<01
)> - -l> ---- . " , , en --I C ~ --I
Z Z , ---- "". /ll ~ /ll 0
)> --I )> ", ", ~ [" '" en
G'l en () ", ", po ~ )> ~
en G'l /ll " " Z I () /ll :I
'5: ;;; en , ,11[;-" en en
en --I <J " , ~9f'f');, 5 0 lJl :;;: '"
2 m 0 , i~ .....,\ I:".,." J ~ )> ~ C -.: n
--I 0 () . ~{it/"" /ll 0 [R /ll /ll 0
~ lJl ~ , .It ), 11~ ',"" ,""' !S~, _ 7' 2J ~ ~ =I
' () is -;" I 11; ~ll -:.~ . Gj '" , ~ () /ll )>
~5 ~ i' I .: ::i_ ,10 .' /1>.// ~~~~' ~ "'" ~ 5 ~
\~~ "< <: /IJ I: ~~.. '", .".~ / / " ", )> )> lJl
<:::.. 7\ , I ~ J4< 'Y ." / ! ". _', /ll 0
I y+',.. - ..' .' ! ,- . ~~"" 7' en
. I , ~ " : i -" % ~$,. Ii i'1\bZ' '". '"""', Z CJ
. ", "" .",-;y ~ -. /1"'-'/ /":: '>cs.,."........:...,.,. ......................... (j)
\\~ "@I: &~~.' "'~ ~~~+ ~L'''' ()..) %. - '?%.1.. J? 7.~~~c.~~ :'\'__:----,
I I..., '05v " · ^' . . ~ :: fJ'~ ......
\ '" . . ". . ~ . . , , .. '" "
. I "!J7 "'" '< . ."".
01 . · 7 ~ Q" .~~,.., / / _ . ~'qf.:
r ~ ~. i a 1 '4 / /~ ; ,'~ .~ ~ I ~: t,: . / I 0 I / \;~ .'
I os: I F< I , il' ' '/ . Ii j '" "'l . /" '" . C
.10
I /0 I'~ '. ,'k' "'-;' . ,. ~o/f,. ~~ -"2 /, (
T ~ : ~ . ~ '.' &. U1 -"- Jt /f . ,;/ / .~ ..... ~..... . I
.L :z I : ------ + / (1 "'.' _ i<: '{i . ,.' " ,.~ -</.
m , , - , " , ....,.. _ " (1 i>' ~, ').... fk 0 . I
~ . ec" - 'i-~ i.'. ,. '" . i'/~':!.. /. it...r' ........ ...."-"rx..,..I.
I ~ I~ ""'-<..I 7J__.'V aD !t,~//. ...<~ ';Y;~~ /' en ..' < /::..-.~' '. ~..~l",N'" )~..~ (t
U1 .,...... '. "" ! " 'i< ih.. . '0-. ." .
-i _ . =, "'" ''>/ " " . "'. ...., '.
- ,. "'-', N.>, 'j, i, 0.. '"
:z:: I .....-
8 I' I ~(I C) . ~ ~:<Q, ~ r~ '" . ,
+ '" ~ "'" ~~ ~ rj""~ ~
I I "/::I.. Qn:r~~~ qv-~ --r~"" t
t /'.fI , , '-''' -*--~ "f J\1 ~ '-" I :""1
-J::_/I (~j /~(j/f)lt~lj )j~t~~ i, ~~ ::~~f4~~f:: p'(5
r - ..! i4 -"~:L /', '-" .' '-" 1 ". .'~"""" "" 1 -~"'f'],.. I
- /, . : '" - 0 Iiiit4,. -, . "'-, ---I:. . ~" .
I ~ ..( i ; t '--Jr' I III 7,..1 ':';''\I~>,J... ,:~ ~ .' ..
<J I . +.M 0 -, ,,:'1 . .'{<1 ~ R~ l '../ .'. ..., ''\'j..
~ ~ < : e; ,,~.... ". . " r-- -\- )-\-ry.<'1 h '1>)" .' /. . '"
I. () '".' . . . _, ;0;-."7 <- ,.I I II' f ,7; , \
( PJ .. ~ (.. .. . ~ ':<< t '. - ~o~ ~ . '" _ .' '. I
~ :~) .~D~' ..' /. J, ~' 1/ ':'tttr~>. .' . ~ ~ ~
/IJ . --- ~: / I / : . : I / )> ~
" : - :1 - r....... / - / . .' , . ". /ll Z
" -J, ir . I \J J '" '. . . .' , .. ':I
t - --I tll, '.p U:J' , '-c:--L ;;~ Ii,. i , , ,Id. "'"'''' ~ . 0
1--__ --0 - · " \1Ij " . 4t-.. I , , !, / ~ II .. ,,,,_ . '. <J
- - - - -~ -- " <tT r . ., A-i- ;; 1 , .. I '. .' / """"",r"SJ )>
.---. Z · ------------ ~"".- ''', -,,+., ",' = --. ------'-1 _ !!;f !! i I" /ll
......... --\Q- - - -f- -- - - - -- - ~ - " '--,,, , + ......, ., '- 1 ! 1 ! 7'
(' ~ - - ~ " - - - - - - - '--" , - c.:" '. ~ , , _
----';r - ~ -- - -/- .. - - - - ,,_ '. __ __ + .. "", . " " c--. Z
lJl ~ - - --.1_ - - - - - - - I , .. --, ~ - ---, _', '~____ + . "'" G'l
\ ~ <J < - - r - ~-.:::. , :.: ~: - _ HADEN C IIE!ExisTiNGJ _ == _..:.__~ ~~:'__~. '
'5: )> ~ -- _ r- =o-.__~ -....-... "___:
en /ll /ll /ll I - - '- - - T _ _ ~ _ _".. _" _'_ '_.
~ <' 7' en I ~ _~'____ ~___.
o z)>. /ll ~__
/ll G'l /ll , I
o c) 0,'-- 50< I
[". ZOO1 )><.;;:: I
po )> --I 0 , I.
Z 5~o ens:: ~'" 0
en :;;: 0 :;;: 0 G'l )> () G'l <:'i
' enG'lz G'len /llo ~~
/IJ)>O:I )>:I I) I )>\1
'/ll /llo )>5=1 G'l:I
~~~ ~'5: /ll)>)> ~2i
m \1m J (1"1 m m 7\ 0 (j) v'
r v' (1"1 Vl 2 m m
v' (j) 0 Vl
.
.
I
=0
II
= 0 Ul
(j)1)'N
/lJmO
Rl20
:;::; Vl (1"1
- I) v'
)>11
()
m
0300
C I) ~
I1m(f)
1120
mVlO
7\11)(1"1
- )> v'
nil
m
I>
?
~I g
~
I
g
g
g
~
>
-
-
~
~
=-
3
~
=
-
18
(j
I-
>
1 11 li!il I fl$. c~~
;' , a c> -.,.~\
~ .:;> "" x ...
T l:i ~ a-< ~
1....'- AN AMENDMEN 1 ~<:t, ~"= :
I 2/0 I/OG PL " I :. ~. J y~# I
"'l"""~ DEN PLACE "._~_~ II I"
;- HA L APPlJCATION _ 1 .._" ~ I...., ~ _ _
~ NEIGHBORHOOD MODE J County, Virginia ;EOmg Scot.. ~:.o1.l16 I Chockrd B)" ~
Z . Albernare ,.._
!=! White Hall DistrICt,
I
-
~
~
tS Dominion
,c-":oc. ~ Development
,,<0/" Jt!I.' Resources. LLC J
...... Dnve
172 South P.n~291 I
Ch.II-JOttc:~""~;9 l' I 2 I (p)
.~"'- :;:.979.1 ~8' CO
~"r:"o,. DDR.VA com
o<~ _
L
.
.
.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
ZMA 2005-0007 Haden Place
STAFF:
REBECCA RAGSDALE
SU BJ ECTlPRO POSALlREQU EST:
Haden Place is a request to rezone 6.69 acres
from R2 Residential to NMD Neighborhood
Model District for 34 residential units (20
detached, 14 attached).
AGENDA DATE:
October 11, 2006
ACTION: X INFORMATION:
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Cilimberg, Echols, Ragsdale
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION: INFORMATION:
LEGAL REVIEW: No
ATTACHMENTS: Yes
OWNER/APPLICANT PURCHASER:
Wendell W. Gibson of Gibson Homes is the owner/applicant with Kelly Strickland of
Dominion Development Resources (formerly Rivanna Engineering & Surveying) as the
consulting engineer.
BACKGROUND:
On July 11, 2006, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this rezoning
request, along with a critical slopes waiver, private street request, and a waiver to street
section requirements. Staff recommended approval of the rezoning and the Commission
unanimously recommended approval with the following changes:
· The affordable housing proffer modified to conform to the County's Affordable
Housing Policy in the Comprehensive Plan.
· The recommended technical changes made to the application plan, code of
development and proffers noted by staff.
· All cash proffers offered by the applicant devoted to transportation improvements in
Crozet.
· An interconnection provided and illustrated on the application plan from the
proposed east/west connector road between Haden and Killdeer Lanes southward to
Summerford Lane in Ballard Field.
DISCUSSION:
The applicant submitted new proffers, Code of Development Plan, and General
Development plan to address these July comments on September 6, 2006. In that
submittal the applicant revised the proffers, Code of Development, and General
Development plan to address all outstanding comments, including the provisions for
affordable housing and cash proffers. The cash proffers have been revised to make all
cash contributions devoted to transportation improvements. No other changes or
increases in cash proffer amounts have been made since the July Planning Commission
meeting.
Regarding affordable housing, the applicant revised the proffer to conform to the
County's adopted Affordable Housing Policy and is using language consistent with
recently approved proffers. Six single-family detached units are proffered as affordable
units, which is 17.6% of the total number of units proposed by the applicant.
.
Regarding density, during consideration of the Wickham Pond II rezoning last month the
Board of Supervisors discussed the interpretation of density allowances for properties in
the areas designated as CT3 in the Crozet Master Plan. Pages 5 and 6 of the Planning
Commission's July 11, 2006 Haden Place staff report (included as part of this Board
package) discuss interpretations of the language in the Master Plan. This is information
that was also presented to the Board as part of the Wickham Pond II staff report. Both
Haden Place and Wickham Pond II have been under review during a similar timeframe
and have relied on staffs prior interpretation of the Master Plan language regarding the
CT3 designation in their density proposals. The Planning Commission supported staffs
interpretation in its recommendations for approval of Wickham Pond II and Haden Place.
The Board accepted staff's interpretation in its Wickham Pond II approval last month.
However, the Board also discussed an alternative interpretation during the Wickham
Pond II rezoning that based increasing density in the CT3 from the mid-range maximum
of 4.5 units/acre to 6.5 units/acre on the provision of 50% of the mid-range maximum
units as affordable units. By comparison, the staff interpretation has been that 50% of
the difference between 4.5 units/acre and 6.5 units/acre must be affordable units. These
two interpretations result in the following number of affordable units being necessary to
achieve greater density:
Interpretation discussed by the Board durinq the Wickham Pond II Rezoninq September
13, 2006-
24 units (maximum allowed without affordable units at 4.5 DU/acre) x 50% = 12 units
provided as affordable units necessary to get 6.5 DU/acre.
.
Staff's interpretation that has been used in Crozet rezoninqs involvinq CT3 areas to
date-
35 units (maximum units allowed with affordable units at 6.5 DU/acre) - 24 units
(maximum units allowed without affordable units at 4.5 DU/acre) = 11 units x 50% = 5.5
(6) affordable units necessary to get 6.5 DU/acre.
Again, Haden Place has proffered 6 units of the 34 proposed as affordable.
The basis of the Board's discussion was that there is already a policy that15% of units
should be affordable and that additional density may be justified only when more
affordable units than the policy calls for are being provided.
The appropriate density for the CT3 sections in Haden Place and other Crozet
developments based on the provision of affordable housing will be different depending
on which interpretation is applied. Application of staff's interpretation means Haden
Place falls within the density guidelines of the Master Plan. Application of the
interpretation discussed by the Board last month means that it does not. Staff would
appreciate the Board's direction as to the interpretation to use for future rezonings in
CT3 areas of Crozet.
Regarding cash proffers, the Board will need to determine whether the Haden Place
proffers are sufficient to satisfy concerns related to infrastructure and the pace of growth
in Crozet. Staff has provided an updated summary of recently approved proffers below
which includes the Wickham Pond II and Westhall V rezonings approved last month as
.
.
.
.
well as those proffered for Haden Place. An updated table is provided as Attachment D
that summarizes existing and potential dwelling units in the Community of Crozet.
Rezonina # of Units Cash Proffer
ZMA 03-12 Stillfried Lane 26 $3000/unit for capital
Townhouses improvements or affordable
housing programs; no physical
improvements or land for future
public facilities.
ZMA 05-14 Poplar Glen (currently 28 $3200/unit for capital
scheduled for a BOS hearing on July improvements and $66,000 for
5, 2006) affordable housing program in lieu
of providing four affordable units;
no physical improvements or land
for future public facilities.
ZMA 04-24 Old Trail Village 2275 $50,000 Cash proffer for park
projects, Cash proffer for schools:
$1000/sfd unit; $500/th unit;
$250/apt.; Cash proffer for public
faculties: $1000/sfd unit; $500/th
unit; $250/mf unit; and physical
improvements including completion
of Western Avenue and dedication
of land for Western Park.
ZMA 05-05 Liberty Hall 43 $3,200 per unit cash proffer for
public facilities; no physical
improvements or land for future
public facilities.
ZMA 02-04 Cascadia 330 Cash proffer for schools and other
public facilities: $3,000 /sfd,
$2500/th, $2000/mf unit.
ZMA 05-18 Wickham Pond II 106 Cash proffer for schools and other
public facilities: $4500/market-rate
unit
ZMA 06-01 Westhall V 36 Cash proffer for schools and other
public facilities: $1000/market-rate
unit for CIP; $3000/market-rate unit
for Eastern Avenue; Spot
improvements to Park Road (apprx
$7500); $3000 for a pedestrian
bridge; on-site greenway trails,
parking area for trailhead, and off-
site temporary easement for
qreenwav
ZMA 05-07 Haden Place 34 Cash proffer for transportation
(PROPOSED) projects in the CIP: $3200 sfd/
market-rate unit and $2700/sfa; off-
site road improvements to Haden
and Killdeer Lanes approx.
$40,000.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
If the Board finds the affordable housing proffer and density proposed for Haden Place
acceptable, and is satisfied that the proffers adequately address the project's impacts,
staff and the Planning Commission have recommended approval of ZMA 2005-00007
with the current proffers (Attachment A), the amended Code of Development
(Attachment B) and the amended General Development Plan (Attachment C).
.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Haden Place Proffers, dated October 2, 2006
B. Haden Place Code of Development, dated October 2, 2006, and prepared by
Dominion Development Resources, LLC
C. Haden Place General Development Plan, dated October 2,2006, and prepared by
Dominion Development Resources, LLC
D. Existing and Potential Dwelling Units in the Community of Crozet
.
.
HadEn r~)!{~c;~
~ - ~ ""~<'?',,'-~,
._= 'C""""__";;"?~'"i""'Ml!\_.~I,l..~~:l,I.,,,,,:'.-,-,,
".-':"~!,':7'~:"~~~~~":"'~,~-:~_""~._;,;,,,,,,,,,~,,~,,~
--
n-o-o
:::r'-JOSoU
~ I\.) :3 ::::1
"""1 ::l
O (j)::J -
- ::l
ITOO&
IT C ::J
('bIT "-
lJ):::rOrn
< -0 ('b ::l
~<&
St> ::J ('b ::::1
IT -
< 0 0 (l)
)>\3 \3 ~
lJ) :3 S
I\.)o~&
I\.)"""1IT"-
CJ)~
n:-u~)>
:::r 0 ('b' \3
~ ::J ~
"""1. -
o OJ~()
IT ('b SoU
ITO ::::1
('b><<:rt"
lJ)~<:",,,-
<()J 0
('b lJ1 (j) ~
~::l
lJ) (l)
o """1
::J,,-
<
)>
a
::J (l)
() <
(l)
o
~
(l)
"""1
"-
I\.)
I\.)
CJ)
o
lJ1
70ln
('b c
lJ) """1
o <
c (\)
"""1'<
() ::::1
('b&
lJ)
OJ
c
'"
:I
)>
o
rn
z
~
(l)
"""1
r
r
n
I'-J
~
)>
f\.)
o
o
Ul
I
o
o
o
--...J
0)>
~\3
~\3
(\)
~
()
c
~
~
(\)
::J
~
7U
(\)
<
lfI
o
::J
o
~
~
(\)
-0
,
)>
n
rn
..-
I
I
I
I
I
I
rnn
I
I
()
~
~
o
:3
N
N
o
o
())
-u
~
:3
~~OOO~~~O~~~(j)(j)(j)~O~~r~
~~~~~~~5~555~~~~~~~E~
~~000~~ozoOO~~~6R~~~~
OXnlnlnlOO~nl~~~ J>J>Z ZZ ~
~~~~~~~~~ ~~~rrJ>~(j)(j)~tt
r~CCCOO 00 J>OOrU10~~
~ZJ>J>J>00~~J>U1U10nlnlOroOJ><~
CIlrrr J> Znlnlnl<<O z~nl
~N~O(j)~~Z~O~OJ>nlnlZ~OO~~
~~~~~~~o~9666~~~g~3~~~
$: - ~ U1 0 ~ ~ (j) 0 Z Z J> 7" 7" J> 0 ..
-Z - nlnl.... ""'''''' I
~(j)~~(j)Z~~U1U1~J>J>~~znl~~~
'''~ 00 OZZnl~- -~r-
o>>~J>J>J>RR~oo~~~z~~
>~~J>ZOO~~OUlUl~~~ ~nl
~oOzo--66Z~~nl>> Ul$:
OC~J>c$:$:ZZJ>~~Ulzz 0
C~ (j)~~~J>J>ZJ>J>~" c
~ nlCOOZZOOO>>~ ~
~<<00Ul~~zz5 0
UlnlrTIUlUl~ 00 Z
~~~~~ C~ ~
Zz~~;E: ~O >
~~J>J>\1 -J> Z
UlUlOO~ CIl
~~ ~
$:
~
nl
>-
-
-
~
~
:r
e
~
=
-
J> J> J>J>J>J>J>J>J>J>J>J> J>
-J>J>~J>~~~~~~m~~~J>~J>J>
O~~~~~m~~~~~~~~~~~~~
('j
~~:-
)>-"";:0
Z-~
)>Z,
(J)-\)>
nl~()
~~~
nl-\I)
~nlO
"O()
)>Vl7"
, ()-\nl
~\. r= 0 -;-1
'", ", - 70 I)
'~:~s:< ~ )> ~
'\:\\ ~ ~ ~.
'\\~,
~\
\~ @
J
c II
~ Ii
~ I
al
~ II
s;: ,
~ 1'/
~II!
~I'
z:
.0
tI.l Projlct T1U"
ff HADEN PLACE I LLUSTRA TIVE PLAN
...
z tllGHBORHOOD MODEL APPUCATION
R Whit II District, Albemarle County. Virginia ~~ Se.... ~_s:-
I g
.........-()
3~0
\.i nl Z
070()
<'nl
(b1)1)
3)>-\
(b70e
:J())>
rtnl,
U'i ,
U'i()'
:rOO
~ ()
=z)>
\jz-\
(bnlO
()~Z
go"
U'izO
Q-\70
~O"
rtVle
(be-\
~ e
rt~70
'O~,nl
\.i nl <
~70rn
o ," ::1:
\.i 0 -
(b70()
~oe
~ s;: s;:
~z70
'--'nl
H
c
g
!
8
-
-$ .
>>
...-
VI\)
Zc.o
Vl,
m)>
70()
<70
)>nl
-\-\
070
zm
nl
)>
70
nl
)>
CJl~Q)
)>-....;:<
VljU-
nlnl'
~)>s;:
nl70(J)
Z~nl
-\0::1:
(J))>O
)>O~
~~nl
(J) Vl
nl
Vl
Vl~Ul
e-....;:-\
70700
"nl~
h~z
nl' ::I
\JOO
)>)>~
700nl
7"nlVl
ZO
(J)
~~
7070
7"nl
z)>
(J)70
1
0,
ZOUl
,)>-\
000
~~~
nl(J)Z
7O)>::I
'700
nl)>s:
~(J)nl
,nlVl
~
70
nl
)>
70
1
'():l
0<
)>-
0,
nlS;:
O(J)
(J)nl
)>::I
~O
(J)~
nlnl
VlVl
~
~LU
~()
\J' 0
)>5~
70)>)>
7"0(J)
Zmnl
(J)OVl
(J)~
)>-\
~f)
(J)::I
nl nl
VlO
....~TltI"
r.. No.... :i:l-69-lMdog
Vl~LU
c-.....:()
70700
"nl-\
)>)>-\
()70)>
nl'G")
\JOnl
)>)>Vl
700
7"nl
zO
(J)
= 0 Ul
(J) I) ~
7Onll\)
nlzO
~Vl~
~"
()
nl
= 0-
CJl\JO
enlOl
=Hzo
nlVlO
~I)Vl
)>"
()
nl
~~,
-....;:-\
700
~~
70Z
'::1:
'0
~~
om
nl(J)
o
I)
)>
70
7"
z
(J)
.
u. '"
() a
,.
[;j
'"
a.
'"
o
g
'J'
o
~
~-
>
N
Cf1 Pr'oJect Tlth?:
::r
<1l
(j)
r+-
HADEN PLACE
NEIGHBORHOOD MODEL APPLICATION
EXISTING PARCELS
z
o
CJ
~
f\) ~
.~ ~ g.
~ ~~~-I
~ '!Jl2 ~
c::g~f\)rr-o
~ " f>~ :? !J1
fE:: ~~ .
~ f\) Cl> ;+ -....!
~ If (\) ij -
3 l;l .
(f) ~
~
..
.tt
\
lJ)1
I Ci
~3
'0 31
- n>
1 70 4.1
. 0
10 'I
. !:.)..
I~~I
1 :J I
n>
I
---. 1
'~~----l___J
..-
CJ
() ~~ -I
~Nf\)!Jl ~
00 Cl>-b"-O
~ ~ -.j (f) i.1 Ul
&=~~~~O)
~i,'Og;~~1
Ulf\)(f)a'" ()l
2j ~~ )>
..
.c:
-----
------
...... ------
~~:.::-:'~
280' -f-/ -------~--- .~.
State M - to End of'
r alntenan
Ce
/
/
~
() !Jl -I
~Nin s:
OO-.jN-o
~~-OUl
&=..~g-O)
~~(f)~
Ulf\)a
01 Ul
CJ ~ I\)
~
.
I
,
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
c
!:.)..
n>
~W ~
QQ t;
O~(U~
OJ OJ 0.__..
. . lJ)
~-~~
-'-1<"'"
O)-Illn>
,
'\)'\)-~
. n>
. lJ'l
OW ~
0)0 n>
-():l
I\)
Ul
\ (
\
\
~\
o n> I
OJ ~ \
m\
!:.)..\
~~ \
~n>\
<..D 0 \
-hI
:::s I\) I
T\)Q\
'-1~\
<..D~I
'\)n> 1
. ~ I
I\):J 1
():l n> I
WlJll
.--..lJ'l
\3 n>
III 3
~n>
:J
rl-
.
o
OJlJ)
<..Dill
T\)~
Ul1J
'\)-<
~lJ)
O~
Wn>
,
o
OJ
I\)
~O
~ -
<..D~
\3(;
I\)~
"'-J:J
<..Dn>
rn
'\) ~
n>
1\)3
():In>
I\)~
~
III
"'"
........
CJ
iJJCJ~-\
-l> ~~ g ~
Ni,,-.jl\)&- -0
o U\(\)_
~ N""(1 - ~ Ul
\).. . f\):'" Ul
~ q ~~ 0 I
~ -l> Il"I ~ 0)
]:wgU)
.c:
CJ
~CJ~-\
I\)I\)!Jlg ~
Ni,,-.jl\)&--o
gIl"lU\(\)=
&. ~~ N::i: Ul
7<l Q U\~ G) 0)
I\) 0 Cl> - I
U1~0)[
~wgU)
~
'\)m
~
UllJ'l
On>
Ul~
.__..:J
'\)"'"
III
"'"
........
'--
------.
T\)
o
<..D
........
//"
,/
/
//
Drawing Title'
White Hall District. Albemarle County, Virginia
Clwcked By' JK$
-----.
------.
~-~'-
o
:J
'"
Er
:J
~ ~-\
() !Jl 0 ~
~Ntu ~-o
gg::j-"g.Ul
rt Ol ':J U1
c:: \).. ~ -l> '" ()
~.._~~
.. i,'Oa ('0 I
Ull\l -.j u-
2j ~ <!- I
~ ~I\)
~ !Jl
------.
/------ , - -
I
I
I
-l>
(\)
~
-r---1
-I,
~ CJ ~ '
() !Jl~g-oj
C CIl ..
=l N ~. is: Ul
~ g ~ ;: Q UlI
c:: &. ~ -l> OJ ()'
Ul" (\) ~ , I
~ i,'O O~ ~ ~
~ f\) -.j (f)!; I
o ~~~ I,
~ "~
,
I
-:::-<~;; >0;;;:"2;/ _ ;'00' +1_ t
/ F ------~~-,.. "'..--{ _ J ate RolJtO
/ '/;_ _ - (. arrna I e bCI
I I,:. ------ ~-- 'c_ I nSG '-"
/ / () ~ -\ I - - -,' -, -___ _ _ .' '..'.~'.';'7~, _ ,l.- __________ .' ap ROad)
/ ~ N!Jl ~ , ______. . I, ~. ~
I \, a ~ t Q ~ I I '-~t"'I;,_,,--.i.,,--~,~, ------"
~ [~: ~ ~ -I i ". /' lT~i~~-~:_~ i, -!--.~------
~ . ~". ~ 0 II h ~ ~ ~ loa ~ ;' I_~___ .
:J \ ~ ~""(1 g I ~ N!Jl \l ,I I ~
wn> "~"'o I ~[~zoUl
Q"Q) '., I 2j ;; 8 ~..~aO) / I 0
..", IT "'J' r! i,'O~ I 1- ____--I
(~ct- ,,' Ulf\)a 0 I _~.-~ ~ OJ
On.. ". I 2l f\) / -:J N !Jl -0 . lJ)
\U " U1 )> / / "0 CJ "'"
, / ~1l~"Ul 1\)0
~ ~ '// C::~-.j~ 0) <..D'
C j / ~ i,'O~ g I 0 3
rl- . _ _ ____. '~7" ~ I\l 2 <..D 0
n>, ____ / CJ (f) @ '\) ~
. s
/
/
/
/
Drowlng Selllel As Shown Druwn By, JKS
FIle NQI"ll?' 55-69-ZHA.dwg
Project No.1 5020
Date.
0921.06
O)rn
W~
lJ'l
~n>
Ul3
n>
~~
~
"'"
'-"
Dominion
Development
Resources, llC
I 72 Soot" ,...,top' DrMl
Charlott=owlo, VA 2291 I
434.979.111 2 I (p)
494,979. "Ill (0
DORVA.com
.n, ,.. .. - :...;:....0(0 . '.~:'" '...... : .
.. 'u ......u. .:~:...,.
,
~, -
'~ / '
--~,~
~~... ."~\.
<, \\ \
'\;, .,
"'
\
I
C
'I
--~---l
OJ '"
!:! 0
&i
'"
0.
'"
0
m
0
CD
0
~~
cn PI'O i~ct Titlel
;:J .
ro
(!)
,....
>z
W 0
~
.... . ~
.-...t.::';':;u,....
\
--- ~ \
)> - \,
-oUl
-0-1
70Z
OGl
?<~
-0
'0
~O
)>m
00
~)>
~~
)>
Ul~
m_
~~
~z
-Gl
ZUl
m)>
Z
-I
)>
~
Drawing litlel
)>~
Z_
OUl
<-I
)>Z
rGl
~-"
~
:::r
~~
~ )i<(j\~-,,~~
\ ,'. ", ' ," ! ~ ~
.' :,X.~ / "\, i < 6
~:_~~ /,~ ~J
'. ....~.. .',.~*...::~~dk)~~:,':;.:~~,;;:.;.~. ~.::.,.~
'~, ~~";>.,;-;2~:~. ,:: "
I"~ \j'll ":'~-r~" 1 "___ '
I' . . .. r ~:.:-----~ ,',- 'r-~
I' ~.~::::~~/:~
'/ / /J .... ...... I
- -" a -- () {)J
S:/O--70-
;il0~w-l8
0~~8()o
~~(JJ(j)~Ul
S:mm-"Ulll
m o--ir~
Z -"00-
-I 0 -oUl
Ul 7OOJm-l
'-' mUlz
Gl
J
,
, 11>D "'"
"~8 '
", if'IA'
" ."'~~f'~
',,'. , 8,".
" '-<If, ,
, " ~ ~o".; ........
", r:: 1-,........
" ,,2IS'
, ", -.': ':Hceq ~ ........
. ". v..........
- <;'>7r::'
" '8),
,," ~
"
\
'i
, \
. .' -...
"'-..
~-I
(.>J~
1\)--0
:l>lJl
n~
?GO>
rn c...o
U>
"
o )> ~\
zOJ-
rUl\
-"m-1
Z-Iz
)>OGl
r
Gl7\J(\)
~~~
0)>0
ZZ)>
~.g!,
m --"1-"_. "-
-0 -0 7\J ..-'__
s;: ~ li1 --- 0 -- , '",-- . '-,
zo~8'c~~ "-.
)> s.. CJ -I r Ul
z~ ~ OJ 7'\-1
-I OJ ..., c:Ez
m ~ r=.~ Gl
30Ul:::r
~ z- 0
~Gl-lc
~Ul~Ul
m.m
~o
)>~
z<
om
~
.-<
1
",
I
"- I
'-,
@
Ul
c:
s:::
s:::
rn
a
~
j"IIJ",..::
':j;;:
Q
70
o
~
,/'
"'f
'-
"
,,---
(
\
\
\
'""", ;'
'1,
I
~~
OUl
-1-1
:IZ
II Gl
+70
,0
I. )>
-;-0
U1
:::!1
I\)
(.>J-I
o>$:
"-J --0
'lJl
)>0>
n,
~c...o
U>
~: ~At~~!i~12;T~~(~O~~) .....:
". . ..' ---.:. ". .....'..... . ..
.' . ~ ~ .
" , /.......
. . ,
, . ,
. ,
: ' , .
I~
EXISTING CONDITIONS / DEMOLITION
Dot"'l
09,21.06
Project No.: 5020
'''''"",-.~ ....,)'.,..
I
I
/
&IP"--
HADEN PLACE
NEIGHBORHOOD MODEL APPLICATION
White Hall District, Albemarle County, Virginia Om;ng S,ol.- As Sho.n
He NOI'lE'I 55-69-Zt1A.dwg
)
/
".;
'\ '( . . "
\""" ,--- '. ,:,",',
'~\. --...... '...
\ : \ "', '.
oJ ' \
/\ \
\ , \
\ \
\ \
\ ' \
[xi \
\' 'I",
I "On"
I
~..'
\
I
I
I
\
I
I
I '
I
--- -
U).
()J()J
0-...1
UlO
\jlo Cj , -" Ul
-1-"
O~
OJ-
m~
Oz
UlGl
-10
C70
~-I
m()
a)>
'-'r
Ul
5
\J
m
Ul
, ..........-, I
i _________
----r
s;~
OUl
-1-1
:I-
Z
110
t~
I)>
-0
-t::.
:::!11
)>~
z_
OUl
<-1
)>z
rGl
<-"
m -
~
:I
d
~
Z
-I
I
,
...
................
,
...
....
~
Ul
-I
Z
Gl
tJ
~'
z
)>
Gl
m
)>
~
)>
o
:s;
o
111
I
m~
(J;-
m(j)
s:-1
m'z
z 0"
-1(\)
---0
IT _
o
\J~
(1) -I
, m
CbJO
o r
() Z
~1I1
(1)
~
'-'
-,
I' '-
I
I
'-
'.
",
-:;:'
~.~.
;/\j'6''1''
: :
-!- :
, '--'-
, !--
mUl
)>)>
Ulz
m -
~>!
~~
-1Ul
m
~
70
'-....-----,
"10,
Dominion
Development
Resources. LLC
I
lJl---.j
om
;$:ilJl
o
o(j)
- 11
(j).........
-I)>
C""'O
70""'0
~t:5
Ox
'-" .
'" '"
(') 0
~
~
~
'"
o
*
-~-',I~~---... ..........~..~
'OC) / T ~~"-......_................ " '--+---':'
" , -.-:N.7---
( -OL0- / I
.
.
~,
---'~
" ----
J;
""'0
0-0
-701\)
(JIo_
-IxOl
C. 0
~~O
rTIO(JI
Ocflll
'-' I
"
I {>,
...! ..t.
I ,
, ,
I ,
I ,
I I
, ,
I ,
I ,
, ,
I I'
I I
I ,
, ,
I ,
I ,
, ,
, I
: .']
, I
, I
, I
I ,
I ,
, ,
I, ,
I ,
, I
, I
, ,
, ,
, ,
, ,
I. ,
I "
, ,
, ,
f ,I
, ,
, ,
I ,
, ,
, ,
, I
I I
, ,
, ,
I : I'
: : /, , 111
i ! 710; .! '
I 1 '/....... , !
I I 1_/
- ~T" -~(:.:~: '~'~'A" /~~. -I ')
<::1..- /
L""+77':.;::'" r-e: :'!
/-.J..J.._-'--1.-J...-1 '''_I .
--~.~_../
.~,::;r:"._.
......... ~ \
)>-
-o(j)
-0-1
70Z
0(1)
?<~
, -0
" . 0
'. \1\)0
'. ,I rTI
")>."
(I '-'
~)>
;M~
'+')>
.'(1
.' -_l~ ,.'
I '/-~'
/" / /". I
"j' (. ."-
-..-.,~'-...~: "
-----
.. .
ttADEN~NE". """'"'' '
", "'. "., ..-,5~a.te Route /209.' ," ...... .
- - ------ -' .. .... "",(30. R.O, w,)
'C':"~"",,,,~.,,,,,.,..:,__
;J,i - - ~.
!
!
!
/0/0/
// // /
'~...L.L........_
'.,
",. '-:."~~/~
-fr '
po-
-0
(j)
-I~
CCJ)
~O
rTI(j)
211
EN PLACE
HAD PPLICATION
D MODEL A . ,
NEIGHBORHOO 'Ie County, Virgll11a
.t Hall District, Albemal .
Whl e
Drow;"91;tI., OPES ANALYSIS
CRITICAL SL
fie No.l"lfl 55-69-ZHA.liwg
Project No.1 5020
.. Dominion
.. c. D I pment
,. ...~.."". eve 0 C
"Otf,,' Resource., LL
. - " I 72 Sout. ""~.r.~;;-;
Cba~~~9,eI21 (p)
434:979.1&& I (Q
DDRVA.c.om
DI'o.wlng Sco.lel A'5 Shown
09,21.06
Dr'o.wn fly' .J<S
Checked By' .J<S
Do. te-l
.
'. '10.
.. ,
""" -'00..
C)'
'010
.........~
C{).)
ZlJl
o
-(j)
(JIll
-I
C
~
rTI
~J
,~
?---
~~~:~I
'--i-_ 0
(j)
-I~
C~
~O
rTI(j)
211
2
rn
)>
/U
OJ
-<
2
0
C
Cj)
-I
~
)>
,
--
()
0
~
~ ~
rn
~ rn
Cj)
)> -I
rn
, /U ::I
0 2 rTI
2
Cj) )> ,
-I , ~
~ OJ
() rTI ~ OJ
--I ~ E3 O~
)> 0
/U 0 rTIrTI
, , ~ <Cj)
rn rTI 2 ~-I
::I U'l U'l O::I
U'l () ::; Il)>
::I , ~,
0 , rTI'
rTI
0 2
rn -I
, ,
rTI
~
rTI
2
-I
)>
~
I ~
0
~
~
i
i
~ ~
>
~
tI.l Projoct Tltwo
::r
Cl)
Cl)
.....
-=~==~==~"~"'~"'~~"'="""""'O'_~"~"''''''''''''''''''_'''''''
--"
C ~~
7OU'l
7"-1
U'lrn
-/U
/ nJ 2
I
. _....~c",,~=....r
Q':) .~ t; ......=.....<~....,...
., ..._.._...k.~,,-=,~""""-'="""~ ..~ ~
<0
rn-l
5~
-0_
7,
fli'
2
o
,<y:
/
......~
)L , /.""\.-
'11 X~~'''\
" .\' j"~">> J;': '"
. / .' ii /~ /";,,
l \ f ';<t!'/' 1,/
Ii. . I., ,''C,?
,I \
i(
./(1 ./...... ..... / /..,
, "'/ \ .;?" /
/ ~-~~~- /' / \<,;,::,/'
'\'-- ----J......-.'..."',"i..,. 14.. () ~~..-:...... '-"" ii.._
"Cr"I/OI~)lr )::vt~L/I~,
\.J--.'. Y... J..f I \. "/.'......~..r;//Jl< .. ;<<"".,_.
Y7Jq .! '(.'.... 'ff' I \,~
..;.'\...~...\. ' . . jl .,~"~i)..,,...., ' 1'/'.0... /
// )...1 '-/, '....'r.....:
/ / '\. / '. T, . /
(' .// /,/ \ ' ;- "'it
l(~\~\r it
;\\ /,/ I /' \ !~f"
L\>::, / ill
\\\/~\
\",,---\ ')(
~. ,,' -"'" \v<-
~",," /
".j
",1
. "'/
I
/
j
I
2
o
()c
rnU'l
2-1
-I/U
rn5>
70,
/
..
I) 1\,
_....----c:::=:~::;~:.';.= .,:,..:-c~""=~:-,._:::::::_~"~~~::.'..>-. \ ,,_,~-:~'r: f:"'"
,.- ,-,'r j'. J'...,......"'\.,'... ,
<; ~':) . Cl ";;) O' \',1
..' , \
:,~
' ,
/ "
(
)'",
/ '-
~
rTI
Cj)
-I
/Urn
rn/U
U'l2
())>
C,
rTlOJ
U'lrTI
O~
c)>
)>70
ohi
/
/
(
()
-00
)>N
70rTI
7"--1
o
rn
-0
)>
~
~"
rTI _
270
-1m
\
\
\ 1/
~//
()
o
~
~
rTI
~
)>
,
()
rTI
2
-I
rTI
/U
/. --..'
......~ .'}i;:
/~.~~ ,:'~~.:,..,
"
C
-I
C
70
rTI
rn
)>
Cj)
-I
rTI
70
2
Il
)>
/U
7"
Cj)
:::j
rn
~
'~0
o~
rnrn
<U'l
rTI-I
'rn
O/U
112
~/U
rn _
20
-I(j)
rTI
OJ()!::
G;~~
- rn-
27"2
U'l(j)
rTI::I
00
-,
~rn
rn
2
,,'~
O(j)
~~
rTI-<
'70
00
Il()
~7\
rTI
2
-I
O()O
-00
~~~
~~2
()rTI-I
-1700
()~
"i>2
,
.".~~:~(;
~,'" Q 0
0\
()
o
N
rn
-I
rn
,
rn
~
rn
2
-I
)>
~
U'l
()
::I
o
o
,
/UOJ
rnrn
U'l)>
rn<
/Urn
<70
Q()
/U70
rn
rn
7"
"
~
MEE~ '\
~\ G-
~. '0'
RIvER:' . ~
I p\
II
\ \
, ,
/''''-..."
~//
/
,s;: ~
i~ ~/
)\/~~/J
~. ~
Z /' "
---.../
, 1//
~\..J <<4 C;
.. .' ......'.{.~
. /.., rU
\ ,;-'0'>4
. l/
. Ii
, r'~'
: t
1Inlw.g T1two
HADEN PLACE
:z NEIGHBORHOOD MODEL APPLICATION
~ Whi.n District, Albemarle County, Virginia
Dow.
,s ":~o,
J;I ,:;..,. ~"o.
tl ~.. lil"" ~
;; . ~ If!!!=< ~V
.= . ~ li2 JIG :I:
!i. \ , ~ ,.~
~ ~ ;j :..-:.-
.... ..I'. yfl.\t,)?
,., '-..........
REGIONAL CONTEXT PLAN
1Inlw.g Se.... As_
n. No... 5S-6'l-~
Projoct No> :lOi!O
11921.116
D omlnJon
Development
Resources. LLC
eh p,.."". Dnve
1Il11e. VA 22~ I I
4.979,612/ (p)
434.979, / bill (ij
nORVAr.nrn
.
. ~~ 1\)
(J1 0
r- l (J1 l
0
. 0 7J l 7J
~ ~ (j)
. 7J (j)
Cb :I
~cr ~O -I (j) :I
I :I -I
~~7")>ZO 0 -I 0
rt-:::J_'II II
Rg5~0~ I 0 II
~ II ~
013 rn ~ 7J 0 ~ ~ ~
<..D(3rnrnllrn
N~7JZ~=:Q 0 ~ 0
-CbS;:-ICC rn rn
o;'zo~~ 0 0 0
0 rn
,q) I\) rn 11 ~ 0 0
~ 0 ~
0 ~ 0
Z
0 Z
--J Z
'"
o.
.........0<0
~orno
........Z:IZ
~z()~
~rncll
(')OC--I
Cb-l~C
\) 0_2:::
· z Z.
0-1-11
~orno
Cb 7JO
· 1
:t1=(j)1I~
I\)C)>_
i ~ 7J 0
2-~oz
rt-rnrnll
Cb7J'O
~II
00 7J
se7J
1\)0
~~
Oz
,q)rn
CIl - r5
~
'"
o
..~
-----
0>
o
'"
o
~. ~
Drawing Tltl,' . r" Ir"! OP~ /'I=~ IT pi A~i . BlOCK DiAGRAM
qN[~~l DlVLL,IVILI\1 ,u ,,' . "
V ""'-f,'-d',uw,
He No.l"lP' ....
Project NO,I :.~2{:
c. Dominion _
..."..0',"., Development.,
c,"!~,;;r Resource.... LLC "
.. · ( , ,~ 50<,,,, e.~~:~:~~
Ch.lI'IOt.i;OO"~~q .61 2. I (r)
'1~'\~"')'lG!,}; lfJ
4.'}~""i.li)RV'\..c"'o
>
Ul
PN "T .\('c;
'TArl!.';, r.u.h.
r r\.. ... . , 'l'U)N'
. . , '. ','! ! PPLlCA <\.
.". '("L' H(,DEL ,\. ". . ,;,
1Eli" HP('RHOJ, ,I.. 'n "Jr,guIH.l
l'. \~l)'~!:'d" Albemarle Com;".:, .
.. t '. 'I -.t, L..S,.II.
WIn (. (1<.,
.
l---'
flrllwlng SrQ.tel {\:-, ~:h(;~fl
1):,l,2tt}t;
DrIUIIl By' ,,~::
ChE!cked By' J<::':
-.....]
U1
l
1I
70
<
~
rn
o
)>
o
rn
en
rn
$:
rn
Z
-I
OJ
?:!! r
80
~n
__ e-- _ 7'\
~
)>
OJ
r
rn
-l
Q
~ $: , ~ '- - :r Gl '1 m 0 () OJ )>
(j)
I\)
<.ow
0"-1
<.0"-1
"-IW
W
-- -~
- -I>- Ul I\)
UlpUlCP
-I>----J-I>-O
WCPO"-l
WCP"-I<.o
- - W
I\)
I\)
<ll
.l>.-
.l>. 0
I\)<ll
0-1>-
CPcp
oCP
-1>-"-1
0<.0
I\)Ul
Ulcp
-I>- I\)
CPw
OUl
-- 1--
<ll009--0000000-
<ll 0 - I\) 0 - Ul - I\) I\) W -I>- "-I W
CP <.oO.l>.-I>----JCPUl-l>-O<ll 1\)-1>-1\)
8 - - W ~ ::::i CP I\) W W Ul <ll = Ui
OW Ul"-l<ll-l>-"-ICP<lloww_"-I
o
e--l--~f~- - ~
000 0
\J \J \J \J
rn rn rTI rn
Z z z z z
)> ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
rn rTI rTI rn
~ ZlJ
~ ~
~ ~
(Jl (Jl (Jl (Jl (Jl (Jl (Jl C :;
3 3 ~ ~ ~ 3 3 (Jlz
mo
W
-I>-
~OOOOOO
~
WW-I>-UlUl<llCP 0
C C C C C C C m$:
z z z z z z z ~~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.
WOOOOOOWI\)Ul-l>--I>-WW
"-I Ul Ul Ul 0 0 Ul Ul
cflcflcflcflcflcflcflcflcflcflcflcflcflcfl
Ul
"-I ~)>
-I>- ~f\1
<ll ~ )>
I-------
()$:
~~
m.
~,
GlO
m-l
'j: )> >
() f\1 Z
f\1)> CJ
~
___ C
o lJ)
'1 cfl rn
-l)> lJ)
~~ C
.c ~
~
)>
~
I\) I\) - - - Ul <ll
ZZZZ:~Z:I\)I\)CPCPCPOO
);;);;);;);;)>);;0000000
0000000
Ul$:
N-
m:Z:
~,
(Jlo
..:Jl-l
---e-
--
W-I>-W<ll<ll"-l<.D
~ ~ ~ ~)> ~)> ~ Ul 0 0 0 Ul 0 Ul
)>)>)> )>0000000
0000000
W
~~~~~~~
(.llUJ(JJC~UlUl
U1 fJl lJ1 l."l U1 U1
::!l ::!l ::!l 1 :'j :'j
~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~,~
::!l ::!l ::!l ::!l 1 :'j :'j 3~
WUlWW-'Ul
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~B rn
1 1 ::!l ::!l 1 :'j ::!l ~~ Ol
)>
~zzzzz",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,lJ\()
)>)>);;);;);;)>::!l::!l::!l::!l l ='I ='I~ (p
--
U;tn~~~~~e
::!l ::!l 1 1 ='l :'j 1 '"
--
000 0 0 0 0
~ ~ ~ J J J ~
~~~)>~~~~~~~~~~
)>)> )>)>)>!:'1!:'1f:ll!:'1!:'1!:'1!:'1
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
>
CJl
'-".)
U) Pt'oject Titl!'
P"
(1)
(1)
r+
:z;
o
HADEN PLACE
NEIGHBORHOOD MODEL APPLICATION
White
Ul$:
N~
m.
~,
(Jl0
.:J)-l
$:
~
:r
-1
Il
)>
~
Z
Gl
II District, Albemarle County, Virginia
() -- ~ --~ ---~ - ---~
() f\1 fR
0 0
-1 :r ~ (Jl Il rn $: f: )> Ul :r OJ $: -l (Jl Ul
(b 0 n- c 9~~n~5.[ R 0 0 0 c 0 :i :i 0
3 3 ~ 0 ~fi~~~ $: () rn 3 IlJ rt' ::: t.5:l t.5:l rn
rn .., " ::::J (f C\ Il. rt" (b Cb ..,
\3 (b 3 (Jlfr~aK() ~;j3?O 5-:] c U\ U\ Z Cb 9- =t, :1 Cb Cb Z
~ Z -l U\ IlJ ::J" -l
0 ~ ~ ~ g ~l ~ ~-~~~~5() U\ U\ I I
.., 0 ~ 0 )> :1 ~ 0 i\t' i\t' )>
IlJ () )> IlJ q"u~"f(b _ ~ (\ 3 ., ~ lS\ .. 0 0' & c
-< n- "'''b''l1;'''-0<.5:1 -< -< , -< U\ ~ ~ ,
() (b ~~~!f U\ -, :r Cb
c , .... Q.'c:,lCl.!i~\U C )> -< c
.-~. n- ~~.z",p~Y' u- )> 0- 0 -<
() \3 c g.E~R~~ Ul () c (Jl
0 IlJ (Jl 3 'l.lJ\g~[n S \3 .Cb U\ IlJ 0-
::\ IT III ~Ul::-:--O..(!t:L ~a"o~_2Q m ~ III () ~ (b n- Cb 01
U\ 5 rn ::\ KS~~Qu- ~n!!~~- (Jl rl- rn \Jl n- IT
n- (Jl III .. :1 (Jl a III lIJ
-, .::\ .. t.5:l ,,~~q s ~ ~ ~ 1i ~ III <.5:1 3 (Jl \3 () ()
c Cb ~ t!,,::\ Cb ::J"
() () ., 0 Q" - Q. ~ :'. (l " 0- Y' 0 3 Cb ::J"
3 ~~~.,~~ ~ ~ = ~ :1 Cb
n- ~ ~ ~ 0 s ~pt~-?!f~ () n- ~ Cb Q Q
5 (b W or III ~t.5:l U\ :1
:1 U\ ::\ 3-'[ "-~o n- IT
U\ n- - C\ ~ ~ =- U'l ~r~ ~~[3 -,
N~~"" c C
c OJ ..... " ~, - 3 ()
U\ III L'1' lC "- (l ~"E~'''-.EC n- (Jl -<
(b il () ~~ Q ~ -1 ~ ~ a\1-g,,~ c m 0-
U\ .... (Jl
if rt- '- ~ q 0" ~ ..... g~Q.() (b .. Ui
g n; i;;ll.ii~1J ~~lJl"-~~~ Y' IIJ
" \Jl u-
" -.g~i 1l[r~~~~5 III Cb
lJl L" ~ 5..~ ~:l ::\ 0-
N Q 3 ~3 ]~~~i\t' tl..
N ~ g Q Yi c \3
. _ 0 ~8 l\_() U\ Ol
~ [~ ~ [ "-'l,Il~~ ~=- Cb U1
ifO-o[ ~ IT
f!L[~i-~rn U\ 0
I o -. ::\
~'~] "" 8 01. U\
~[Br ~I ~1>~1
r ~ "l or a..
, 9 ~ g
~ - ,
q g
p ~
, f
c-- c-- .---. ~-_._~--
OJ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ OJ OJ ~ OJ
-;< ~ -;< -;< t -;<
?O ~ ~ ~ ?O ~ ?O ~ ~
G) Gl Gl Gl Gl G) Gl G) Gl Gl
:I :r :r :r :I :I :I :I :I :I
-j -j -j -j -j -j -j -j -j -j
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ OJ OJ OJ ~ OJ
-;< -;< -;< -;<
~ ?O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Gl G) Gl Gl Gl Gl Gl Gl Gl Gl
:r :r :r :r :I :I :I :I :I :I
-j -j --i -j -j -j -j -j -j -j
OJ OJ OJ ~ ~ OJ ~ OJ OJ OJ ~
-;< -;< -;< -;< -;< -;< -;<
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Gl Gl Gl Gl Gl Gl Gl Gl Gl Gl Gl
:I :r :I :I :I :I :I :I :I :I :I
-j -j --i -j -j -j -j -j -j -j -j
OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ ~ OJ OJ OJ
-;< -;< -< -;< -;< -;< -;< -;< -;< -;<
?O ~ ;., ?O ~ ~ 70 ?O ~ ~ ~
G) Gl G) G) Gl Gl G) G) Gl Gl Gl
:r :r :r :I :I :I :I :I :I :I :I
-=-- -j -j -j -j -=-- -j -j -j -j -j
~ ~~ -
~ ~ OJ ~ ~ ~ OJ ~ ~ ~ ~
-;< -;<
?O ?O ~ ;., ?O ;., ?O ;lo ?O ?O ?O
G) G) Gl G) G) G) G) G) G) G) G)
:I :r :I :I :r :I :r :I :I :I :I
-j -j -j -j -j -j -j -j -j -j -j
OJ ~ OJ ~ ~ OJ OJ
-;< -;< -;< -;<
~ ?O ?O ~ ~ ~ ?O
Gl G) G) Gl Gl Gl G)
:I :r :I :r :I :I :I
-j -j -j -j -j -j -j
I--- - - -- - - --------- --- c-- - ---
OJ OJ OJ ~ ~ ~ OJ
-;< -;< -;< -;<
?O ~ ~ ;., ?O ~ 70
G) Gl Gl G) G) Gl G)
:r :r :r :I :I :r :r
--i -j -=-- -j -j -j -j
-
~ OJ ~ OJ
-< -;<
~ i:! ~ ~
Gl Gl Gl Gl
:I :r :I :I
-j -j -j -j
OJ OJ OJ OJ
-;< -< -< -;<
?O ;., ;., ?O
G) G) G) G)
:I :r :r :r
--i -j -j -j
~ ~ OJ ~
-;<
~ i:! ~ ~
Gl Gl Gl Gl
:r :r :r :I
-j -j --i -j
~
~
-I>-
W
~
(JlZ()'1()~(JlOJ()~()UlOJf\1~Il(JlGl)>zf\1ll$:
C-l0~0~c5o)>0:r5()56:rc~'1'10~
$:rnZczo$:()~~zO()70()'1~6corn70~
$:~~70~m$:~$:~~~~~~'1,~z:~709$:
rn070~llrnm,-c)>70z,-)>UlmOJ-~$:-lmc
~ZCO~~~(Jl~()<O(Jl~o~(]m~Ul~O~$:
OZ())> J>O:r-l-=-1)>z:r - '(Jl--(Jl
7Om=~~Z70)>-<6~(Jl)>~1~~'1ZO:r05
o~~. )>!'10~ozO:r~'7'-l~OOJzRlp:-l
r- -lz rnozm ~m~70'O-l~()
~~~~0~:;z~'1)>~zk~00)>8Z(Jl(Jl0
m(Jl00~0~Po'-lf\1)>prnzO-l0~~(Jl~.)><
. <mZZ CIl:r)>UlC~O~ ~(Jl~_zm
0:r~<)>$:~0$:rn(Jl;.,0~'-0-l9~OJ~0~
~~'m m 0 ~mm :r,u)>~ ~
~ m , 0 Z 0 )> z~ - ::I. )> (Jl (Jl OJ m 0 )> () :r Il m'"
zZO -l )>.:rm)>Z 70)>
-lllrnUl)><~f\1~)>-l )>70~OJO~O-l"
OJUlm_ Ilrn () Z707O, 70, . c-
~-l70GlUlO:r .:...jOJ-<~~'~(JlmGl GlO(JlOJ
OOZ::I-lo Omorn~z -l:r~ :r~C
-l'1(JlO~c 7O$:~()70()~(Jl0::I <llOr
rn:r:r(Jl~~L O::::j-lO-lEo)>c~ . <S2
Zrn)>:r )>J> '10czOo<llh;~, W-Z
:r-u0~0,70 Il)>EjJ~(Jlm' OZ$: '1~Gl
)>70rn,Z'1() :;-l)>70:r1l ~0m 00'1
oozOJ(Jlco zmz<~)> . rn 70 0
m-UIl~:r~Z zO())>rn(Jl ~~-l )>OJ-(o
Z~:; m Z z-lm~-l(Jl ():r)> 0 -l
~~()~~f\1p: GlOzO)>< :r~~ S25~
J>-<rn-l ~.:...j )>-l ZUlm C70rn -l-l-
~~Ul~~~6 z~~)>~)> ~o~$: 6Ul~
m::IS:' ,z 0 rn~ z: -l )> ZN~
)> )>----l 0 . C )>m
z~F~~~O ~ ~~ ,. ~
o~ o~$: ~ ~ ~$:() E
~ )> ~ <: ~mO 0
:r -l -1 ~ 70ZC z
~ )> -l-lZ Gl
Q 0 =<
DI'o...i1\9 litle:
:z:
o
-t
rn
(j)
:; -0
Z rn
o 70
5\ ~
~ ~
() rn
~ CJ
gj C
m lJ)
~ rn
m -\
~ )>
G; OJ
r
rn
)>
OJ
()
o
m
'1
Gl
:r
'-
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN - LAND U5E
Dominion
Development
Resources. LLC
Drawing SCO\~I None
Project No.1 5020
Fie Hnl"l€" 55-69-ZHA.d'lfg
Dote,
09.11.06
~ ~ )> )>
() () s: s: ~
~ ~ rn rn rn ~ ~ GJ :;
Z Z 0 ~ \l ~ ()
~ ~ rn 0 \l
~ ~ C ~ :; Z :;
\l rn s:
5 5 ~ )> CJ ~ GJ 0 Z CJ
, )> s: lJl Z 11
Z Z lJl lJl CJ rn ~ () lJl () ::j rn
\l \l GJ Z ~ hi \l C ~
)> )> )> )> GJ ~ ~ 0 CJ )> Z )> Z
~ ~ () () )> rn ~ () \l GJ
rn rn rn ~ rn , C Z rn ~ rn C
)> )> Z Z \l lJl ~
)> rn :; CJ , )> CJJ s: ~
~ lJl 0 GJ
~ )> rn < Z ~ C rn Z2
< lJl \l ~ , ~ ~ CJ
0 ~ f) 0 7' " \l
0 ~ \l " )>
C :; )> ~ rn lJl
S :; rn lJl rn Z Z
~ CJJ () ~
~ rn
CJJ CJ hi
CJ ,
rn
- ():l ~
lJ1 ()) UJ UJ U) N N -
():l ()) lJ1 ~ lJ1 U1
N N - lJ1 ():l UJ ():l N lJ1
():l --..J lJ1 N ~ ~ --..J N - ():l 2J
lJ1 UJ 0 ()) ():l ~
UJ ():l ()) 0 -
- UJ - 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 j;
n
UJ ():l U) 0 0 0 f\) 0 0 UJ ~
~ UJ ()) --..J ():l UJ N ()) lJ1 ())
~
0
N lJ1 f\) - 110
- - UJ 0 0 lJ1
0 --..J U) lJ1 -l
0 UJ UJ 0 N ~ UJ U) --..J i>. 0
-l
)>
C
\J
70
lJ1 ()) UJ ~ U) f\) 0
():l UJ UJ ~ ::;
N --..J - lJ1 ():l UJ ():l CJ
N ~ --..J N rn
():l 0 UJ 0 ~ ()) ():l 0
UJ --..J 0
(J)
2J
N f\) )>
()) - f\) f\) - ~
U) f\)
():l 0 ()) N 0 0 f\) )>
0 0 0 0 0 (j)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U1
0 0
~,
().l
f\)
)>"\J()-l-l
\Jni70)>:I:I
\J,o,rnrn
c:o<() =)>
()(j)-CGJ70
~)>~:;~~
<5 Z "01 --1 rn
zoo<5t]iAi
\J 7070 t]i-o 0
("'"011 =pc
J>PC ()-
ZO--1:r;rnAi
. ~COl'-O
m?O,p
pnlrn$:"
CZ$:nlO
Gl--1pZ70
Znl'-(:::jp
$:~Olni$:
S2onl(j)S2
--1Z70'--
(j)Znl70:<
pnlO~(j)
(j)~~Ai-o
~~eJ~~
~(j)z<5(j)
z--10z:r
070 0
ZOlO ~
--1Pnl Z
~~~ Z
(j)700
o
()POl)>
O'nlZ
$:~$:-<
$:$::::jQ
cp-(j)
z?OGJ~
-,p,-
--11"11--170
-< 1"1101
onop
nlO--1Z
<coo
pl~--1nl
o-<:ro
-001"11"
$: ?:i (j) -j
nlnlp:r
Zo--1nl
~--1Ui()
0110
?OPz
O~Ul
,,-1"11
070
-oz<
:;o~
z,,-
z--10
z:rZ
Glnlp
p 70
Z 1"11
o P
Ul
:r
p
,
,
pO)>
'1"11'
01<'
1"111"11:;
$:5z
P-oo
~$:Ul
1"111"110
oZp
0--131
CUlZ
z:rGl
=<~$:
)>'P
-001--1
-01"111"11
7OUl~
OnlP
<,'
nlnl~
o~:::j
-onl:I
:;oz
Z"--1
--1~~
~$:Ul
--1--1
. :r
1"11
>>
CJl
(A)
UJ Projtct T;t~
::r
~ HADEN PLACE
....
:z NEIGHBORHOOD MODEL APPLICATION
!=!
White Hall District. Albemarle County. Virginia
)>
~
)>
)>
~
)>
)>
~ Z
)> CJ
~ 70
)> rn
()
70
rn
~
o
z
()
)>
r
()
)> C
~ ~
=< -
p 0
~ Z
(J; (j)
)>
<
~
s::
OJ
,
rn
~
n
~
?j
o
Z
:z:
o
---1
rn
(j)
J>1l
zO
GJ 00
70 CJl-j
1Il\l
rn z~
rn
z n::I
::I
(j) III
\J \J)
)>
()
rn
-
)>
~
rn
Z
--I
rn
(j)
-
\J)nlln
cOOO
~z/Uz
~zlln
IIlIllCnl
7On-j-o
Il-lc-j
OO/Uc
/Uzlllf::
o-jZr
~O-jO
z 9Jn
,.,., I J>
, " \l-j
J>O
70z
n
rn
r
-j
~
rn
n
0 -j
z 70
\J) nl
III nl
70 \l
< /U
~ nl
\J)
0 nl
Z /U
J> \l <
70 0 ~
rn n 0
J> 6
z
J> ~
/U r
rn r
J> 0
III (f)
III
70 \l
~ ~
Z
Z -I
III
Z
GJ
\J)
-I
~
\l
\J)
n
J>
r
nl
GJ
70
nl
nl
Z
\J)
\l
J>
n
nl
cr} CJ1
C
\l ::I .1
~ J> n 11
0 III
Z III 0 70
-j z ~
z ~ ~
GJ C
z z
\J) III
-j ~ r
~ 0
\l GJ -j
70
III
rn
Z
II
U1
Q
--t-
h"'O Sc.~ ~ _ Dr.... Iyo .JCS
DeW. O'I~UJ6 Chocktd Iyo on
Ilt 110.... "-6'1-lIlAdog
Projtct ...., ~
i!i .......
....... C 01/;-"
J;l 1:-/ ., 0.,.\
13 ,~ e ~ ~,
;; . ~.t II! ~ ~:.
..... . ,. z;S! ;a ~
;. \ft, ; ~ ~fll
~ ..::.~~~
172 South Pa~ Dnve
Charlotte~vllle. VA 2291 I
~3~.979.6121 (p)
~3~.979. I b61 (~
ODRVA.com
h"'O Till..
GREENSPACE AND AMENITIES PLAN
Dominion
Development
Resources, LLC
lJ1 ~l>J
jIJ
C1l
III
,
()Z
o 0
3 U\
(\) -
, s::L
C1l
0,<
rtlll
U\ ,
U\ s::L
::rU\
III ::r
= III
::r -
III "
~ C1l
rt'
::rC1l
" C1l.g
C1l -n-
o '
(') _ C1l
~ 0 s::L
rt 5; ~
~ :3
C1l & g:
s::L U\ C1l
o (\) (')
:3 rto
III ~ 3
(') (') 3
(') Go
~ -n:3
U\ ' ~
C1l ~ III
~ f; Ul g:Q,
C1l n ""
3n1 G'"1ll
C1l Ul n1 U\ rt
:3 Ul s: Ul C1l rt
ttO~-t(')1ll
~z~o~
~ Ul~:3C1l
::r ~ -t s::L s::L
(') 70 70 Ul III
::rCC~-<1ll
~~~~~R
Ill~~~~~
~o
.. -<
U\
rt
,
C
(')
rt
C
,
C1l
U\
II
,
o
~
C1l
,
rt
'<
C"
:3
(\)
U\
::r
III
"
C1l
o OJ
C1l C
:3 r
c;l\lQg
, z
(\) G')
s::L
o
:3
)>
C1l
'<
)>
r./J Project I Jtll?1
;r-
([>
(1)
.--
".:t>-
O"Jz
o
)>
n
n
n1
lJ)
lJ) s:
O~
~z~
lJ)UlG
-t -t n1
7Il7lllJ)
C C @
~~)>
C C ()
~~~
OJ
c
112~g
z
G')
N-:-
(j))>
~3
C1l :3
U\ 3
(\) c
8=3
III 0
o -n
GlJ1
-nO
Q 08
(J.lo
- -n
o rt
o ::r
7\C1l
)>-n
,
U\ 0
::r:3
III rt
"g-
C1l
III s::L
U\ :3
-n&
o (\)
o (\)
~ <
~ ~
o
:3
U\
::r
III
HADEN PLACE
"
C1l
o
(')
III
tt
C1l
s::L
~
rt
::r
:3
lJ1
o
-n
rt
::r
C1l
11
,
o
:3
rt
(J.l
c:
s::L
I
-l
o
C"
:3
C1l
IB'X 10'
PARKING BAY
mN
)>Q
(j))>
m()
$:()
mm
Z(j)
-l(j)
P
r
r
rn
-<
P
20' TRAVEL LANE
z
o
~
rn
(j)
181 BUILDING SETBACK
lflP
---in
;un
ern
nlfl
-\lfl
eo
~~
~~
~n~
(3~
70)>
()7O
=r)
-0
E)
L..
rn
QCJl
0)>
)
40' MIN. REAR BUILDING SETBACK
30' FRONT BUILD-TO LINE
251 MIN. FRONT BUILDING SETBACK
4' ENCROACHMENT (AS PER 4. I I. I)
-<11
)>70
700
02
-t
-Oil
~E)
()Z
=r-t
-oCJl
E)~
L..
rn
Q
o
z
_P~o.PERTY
LINE
$:
P
z
lfl
-1
;u
C
n
-\
e
;u
rn
z
o
-t
-t
o
lJ)
()
)>
hi
rt
Q
7U
o
~
o
rn
o
R
)>
g; t- - _: ~ARKING LANE
~ ~ IO'TRAVELLANE
I -
o ~
11 z
I (j)
~ ~
-< t3
~
L
PROPERTY
;d~), . h~ .. LINE
o ~
~
1D=r n
p". ";;'. tt\, 0
o ~
~ _u_ - -i --~ ~
Z 0
rn i
o
U1
5' SIDEWALK
G1 LANDSCAPE ISLE
10' TRAVEL LANE
Dro.wlngrltll?'
z
p
Block A: Section and Setbacks
~
,.,
~
n
~
~
;--...
NSIGHBORHOOD MODEL APPLICATION
rMe Nal'lel :~~~'.i,-:;-'i:?~.4....J<i:i
~
r1
White I ~)1I District, Albemarle County, Virginifl
nro,Wlnj:) Scale. Not 1;.1 ";r::\l~
Projp.ct No.. :~~?~
flniPI
119.21.ti&
::!l
J. _P~OPERTY
LINE
-\:>.
~
~
,
\I
,
o
""'\3
(1l
,
rt
'<
C
::J
(1l
lJ\
::r
~
"
(1l
()
(1l
::J
rt
(1l
.,
(1l
~
o
::J
~
()
()
(1l
lJ\
lJ\
(1l
~
lJ\
(1l
3
(1l
::J
rt
~
::r
()
::r
lJ\
::r
~
"
(1l
() )>
~ () Ul
rt ~ 0
(1l Ul ill
, Ul s: Ul
(1l o)>--i
~ ~ z ~
o UlUlill
::J --i --i --i
)> 70 70 Ul
CC@
~ ClCl)>
OJ ~ ~ ~
>>
OJz
. 0
t'0
.
~~~ Z
() (j) )> 0
o ~ 3 -1
3(1lSrn
~~3(j)
_rtC
o ,,3 ..
11 ~ 0
() -+>
~aU1
~-+>O
-0
::r'cfi
~OJ~
(1l 0 rt
rt()::r
::r7'Gl
GlOJ-+>
-+>lJ\'
o ::r 0
O~~
:;,,"
::J Gl s:
& ~
lJ\ ~ S
(1l -+> &
tr Q (1l
~ -
() " (1l
a s: ~
-+>~~
, S 0
0& ::J
3 ~ lJ\
rt:::l::r
::r~1\.)
Gl -
lJ\(J)"
Gl -.::: Gl
() 0 0
o ' ()
::J ~ ~
~()rt
~ () Gl
-<Gl~
lJ\
lJ\ lJ\ ~
q-Ort
~ -< ~
rtlJ\
., rt U1
, -
C 0
~-+>
C rt
, ::r
Gl Gl
lJ\
II
,
o
::J
rt
OJ
C
~
,
-l
o
C
::J
g Gl
Nor
_ _ 0
z
(j)
g2 Pruject r Itle'
(D
(1)
c+
.
.
-p;:l'~''r\w'
;): .~ ,,\....;/~:~,'1-::.K',.: .~
'\.-' ~
U"lE
I
o
lJ'
~
1
U1
Q
?O
GJ
:I
-l
I
o
11
I
~
~
Ul
=.!
z
Gl
LU
o
6
~
t-
I'\)
Q
o
rn
o
()
~
o
,1-
51 SIDEWALK
~?:{;;~P
10' TRAVEL LANE
7\
II
)>1
zO
rnrn
rn
7U
o
o
-t-~"~
())
o
^ I ~
OVl
tJ~
, ==I.rRO~ERTY
LINE
10' TRAVEL LANE
(;' PARKING LANE
(;' LANDSCAPE ISLE
-(11 \Ill \J
~b 70
)>70 0
700 ()Z L-
OZ :r:-l n1
-l ()
) -l1Jl
4' MAX. ENCROACHMENT (AS PER 4. I I. I) 0)>
Z-<
)
25' MIN. FRONT BUILDING SETBACK
30' FRONT BUILD-TO LINE
W-----
II
II ~
II )>
II z
II (j)
II --1
I~---- 7U
C
-.\~T\ n
It~]l)\
--1
I'{b
I" c
lit 7U
n~1 rn
I~): 1\
-~;,
30' MIN. REAR
BUILDING SETBACK ~
) \I OJ
b~
L-
070 nl
()
71Jn1 -l
())>
:r:7IJ 0
Z
n~-- )>
~~- I PROPERTY
nl() I - -
~() -;,-
nlnl rn LINE
Z(j) 20' TRAVEL LANE -<
-l(j)
OJ
z
o
--i
--i
o
Ul
()
)>
hi
10' X 181
PARKING BAY
WC'r-'~J
'@) ..
'.ii:t
ilil! or'
/~-JI
~W') iv
h
ell-
Ii"} f i. {1-;
Ora.wfnQ Htlel
z
p
HAm~N PLACE
Block B: Section and Setbacks
~
~
1il .
-< .
!Oi
t 7'e ~.:xlth r.llltOI~1 Dnw:
r.);.:l:r~cttA'.Mllr.l:. VJ~ ~~?:~ I I
434.g.,;t.,!1 I;? I (t7}
.....34.D7:7.Ift::;!,J if}
Dl):O(V"..C.(I:n
NSIGIIBOmlOOD MODE!, APPLICATION
White Hall Dist.rict, Albemarle Count.y, Virginia
Dro.Wlng SCillel ~~o:' .t,;J ~r.:lh! Dro.wn By. ..lIe
rue NQI'lt'1 :i:~..~8-'D{~,"^:;
~
Dl,tpl
!l9.2U:1) Ctlpcked BYI .le
ProJe-ct No.. :~~?(';
20' TRAVEL
LANE
ml'!'\)
(nQ
m~
~Cl
mCl
zm
-jlJl
lJl
~
121'l.'f
IO'X /81
PARKING BAY
~~ "
E:5
gill '-
rn
!/ QIJl
OJ>
20' MIN. REAR BUILDING SETBACK z'-(
/
~
()J [\) Z )>
z
~ nlJ\ (j) 0 (j)
--1
o rt' QL --1 7U
tll ., ., (1)
., :J C rn c
II (1) ~ lJ\ (j) n
., ., C (1) --1
0 - ., rt C
0 (1) '\J
\:i rtlJ\ tll ~
(1) lJ\ (')
rl- lJ\ 7'
lJ\ ::r lJ\
'< ::rtll
tll ., ~
C =(1) 0
:J ., 10' MIN. FRONT BUILDING SETBACK
(1) ::rtll
tll OJ
lJ\ < (') 0
::r (1) 0
tll rt'3 (')
7'
::r3 n
t;J (1) 0 f'ROf'ERlY
(1) o:J tll . . LINE
(") :J 5' SIDEWALK ~~:.j~';::''s:.
(1) =~CL
o tll
:J ~~ 0
rt' (;' LANDSCAPE ISLE
C1l :J rt'lJ\
., &
C1l ::r ::r ~
CL lJ\ (1) tll (;' PARKING LANE
., lJl
0 ~(1)'\J ~
:3 t;JlJ\C1l \J
tll tll ::r /4' TRAVEL LANE (ONE-WAY) ~
(') (') tll (f) <
(') (fi'\J~ ~
C1l
lJ\ -+>(1)0 m
lJ\ -, -, E3
o :J 10- 8' LANDSCAPE MEDIAN O-/i'I-
(1) :3 0 ~ ~ ~
tll -) 0
lJ\ ~~CL
(1) 0; CL S III
3 lJ\(1)& 141 TRAVEL LANE (ONE-WAY) en
C1l I\)
(1) lJ\ tll 0 III
:J 0 ~
rt' (') (1) :J ~
ort-'QL I~ III
~ t;J (;' PARKING LANE z
:J tll U1 -j
::r CL (')_
(') tll7'~
::r --<. 0 (;' LANDSCAPE ISLE
.,
lJ\ )> lJ\ tll
::r rt'
tll n Ul ., (') 5' SIDEWALK ;~~~::'<I
n (1) (')
r1l a (1) (1) f'ROf'ERlY
t;J Ul rn rt' lJ\ LINE
(1) (j) $: Ul lJ\
0 2': -I 0
(') ~ z ~ ~
(1)
:J UlUl~ lJ\
rt' -I -I Ul 10' MIN. FRONT BUILDING SETBACK
(1) rt'
., ~ ~ @ -,
(1) C
CL ~ ~ )> (')
rt'
0 CCn C ~
~ ~ ~ .,
:J (1) )>
)> lJ\
Z
(1) OJ ~ (j)
'< --1
lJ\ C (1) 7U
r :J
)> ~ ~ 0 C
tll Z tll q
Gl rt'
:J rt'
QL tll C
OJ (') ~
::r
(1)
CL
20' MIN. REAR BUILDING SETBACK
) "1Jl
E:5~
'--
rn
~~ q
6
::I Z
z
o
-I
-I
o
(j)
n
)>
hi
Ill!'\)
G;Q
1Il~
~O
nO
Zlll
-jlJl
lJl
I 2' TRAVEL
LANE
)>
,-
,-
~
)>
f'ROf'ERlY
LINE
(.J) Project fltlel
::r
CD
>~
c::r::,Z
o
c..v .. WI' I1")J1 District, Albemarle County, Virginia
Oro.wlng Htlcl
~
D om,,,I.,n
Developrnent
Resources. LLC
HADEN PLACE
IlntE'l
09.2Uil}
'"
,.,
Q
'il
~
~ 7~ Sooth I" ')tl,t;>l;: .1~1W=.
.'~lkl. y/.. .-:2.H.
~:;~;:~l;:': (r~
!)I)l:.(.IjI'l-..C.OIf'l
BlOCKS C $ D: Section and Setbacks
NElGIlBOmlOOD MODEL APPLICATION
Dro.Wlng Scatel No; to 'k:ll<>
rMe NaMe; :i~~"i,~";:MA.;J:,;~~
~
Pr'oJp.ct NO.1 :~(;2;:
>-
CJz
. 0
~
.
t'.J) Project IItlel
::r
<1l
(!,
,-0-
z
~ 0
-... -\
(1l tI\
.,
rt' (j)
0
lJl
::::>
(1l
(1l
rt'
lJl
)>
I
OJ
rt'
::::>
.,
0
c
&
::::>
)>
I
OJ
U)
-...
0
.,
\J
c
~
::J
&
lJl
(1l
rt'
\J
~
()
iT
z
~
-i
o
Ul
()
~
HADEN FU\CE
NEIGHBORHOOD Mom:L APPLICATION
White Hall District, Albemarle County, Virginia
.
51 SIDEWALK
:~~i::'):.1
(;1 LANDSCAPE ISLE
I II TRAVEL LANE
I I' TRAVEL LANE
(;1 PARKING LANE
.I~~"~'
'\ I
I' .
, .,/-tr
(;1 LANDSCAPE ISLE
5' SIDEWALK
-0
?J
~ 0
)>-fl\--o
Z(j)O
)>~(j)
G>Om
m 0
~?J-o
m~o
Z~()
~}>7"
)>~rn
?Jrn--\
m?J-o
)> )>
?J
7"
Orll.wlng Utlc'
Connector Road: T yplcai Section
~~
~~
()-o
O?J
?JzO
Oz-o
)>~O----
O~lJ)
Om
?JO
='1
- -f'r
Dnt{Jl
!I9.2!.(:t>
Cl1p(kf'd BYl ..Ie:
Projp,ct No.' :'iCP.:'i
rUe Nnl'lel :i~i"f,S:"lMP..IJvi:~
Dro.wlng SCQlel No. l~l SCl.!~ Dro.lIIn By' ..Ie
.
';;. "it::.":c.,"\!""'C",""'.".\,.,,,.>,,:,,"",';
DOMinion
Developrnent
Reaouro~s. LLC
I 72 goo~h ''''lltOf':!! Dr:w
Ct:Jlr:C1'tt..s.'Wl!l.", Vf~ 221~ I I
434.9"/9'_81;~ I (f')
434.97:3.t'e.1 If}
!)I)=<:''ifA,.(:<l'fI
f
'l'C,!,. ii', '."
i"1\t "'?i."".......""
~y\;t :.~ ":,;: ~:1.\t;;.;"
r.\'L~'/, <\~1:
('~\ti f\ ;t:'.:
.~fX:,. l)"L~I\!J:h~'. 0
~,"1 ~~ ~:lt~~1~ :~r_~.. ./,.....lt~~' -0
~':i"" !'I""k' OJ m
rr~j f' 'i41 ':1 C Z
,s(4 . ~ U'l
mil
,IU)>
n
m
fROPERTY
LINE
5' SIDEWALK I\)
0
::'j
In 0
::'j ::'j
9' X 181
PARKING BAY
Ul
U1
0
::'j
TRAVEL LANE
(ONE WAY)
I\)
-U
<
0 () ~
Il
m 0 rn
z ~ b
U'l
Il }> }>
)> (j) 0
n 0 0
m rn ::'j rn
(j) (j) )>
~ (j)
m ~
z rn
z
--1
J\)
~ Q
Ul IU
(\) ()
3 ()
(\) (\)
:::l Ul
ITUl
J\) :- Z
(j) )> 0
~ 3 -\
(\) S rn
Ul3(r'\
(\) c VI
~3
IU 0
() ~
G:Ul
~O
~ ~
OJo
- ~
o IT
() 3
U)(\)
~
~rn (3
~11 ~
)>IY
zS
O~
(j)~
~(\)
IU (\)
=<
IY~
Ol 6
(f):::l
- Ul
~3
o IU
.., =
OJIY
S Ol
~o
:::l ()
& IU
Ul IT
tu (\)
:::l ~
~~
Ulct-
-3
O':::l
.., Ul
)> 0-
() ~
() IT
(\) 3
~ (\)
o 11
-< (3
Ul :::l
IT IT
2 OJ
() c
g~
.., I
(\) --1
Ul 0
C"
:::l
(\)
30' MIN. REAR BUILDING SETBACK
,
lle';,
/I i I.
II I,
1~I'il
II :J
II
II
II
II
1J____
<;' FRONT BUILDING SETBACK
TRAVEL LANE
(ONE WAY)
51 SIDEWALK
;J:!'~-~'
PROPERTY
LINE
2l~
~)>
::I/O
)
'"'0 OJ
~p<
'-
m
~
<5
)
--1
o
~
Z
:I
o
~
rn
(j)
U1
o
~::'j
~ j
\
U1
o
l~
PROPERTY
LINE
z
o
-l
-l
o
VI
()
)>
hi
(..J) ProJ~ct IItlel
:::r
(!l
",
M"
Dro.wlng Htlc~1
>-
CJJz
o
c-n
HADEN PLACE
NEIGIIBOmmOD MODEL APPLICATION
Blocks E, F I and G: Section and Setbacks
Whit"Iall District, Albemarle County, Virgini::\
Dro.wtng SC.:r.h~1 ~Jo:. '~~I :\(~~h~
rRe NoI"1[>1 s~~,,~,,;"Z!J.~.:j,"r~
nt\te!
O'J.2!J:t)
ProJp.<:t NO.1 :;02;'}
--1
o
~
Z
:I
o
~
rn
(j)
is
Dominion
Davaloprnent
Resources, LlC
'"
..,
~
n
iil
~
~
::>--
OJ
en
.
().)N Z
0)>90
, - IT ---.l
- Cl--'
~:3:Trn
~\S:) (r'\
\U ' (1) \JJ
'< ~ U\
() (1) :3
s...:3\U
< (1) '<
(t :)
-, IT '
IT lJ\ (t
~U\~
:3 :T -,
\U \U (1)
1;J1;JlJ\
o (t 0
X \U :3
~ \S (1)
~ \S :3
(1) , 0
ITo~
~~:!'
U\ ~ ()
:TI;J~
\U '< 6
I;J::;:~
(1) & rt
:3 :1 0
~ tu ~
(t 0 (1)
~(1)::)
tT \S tT
o ~ 0
\U rt (1)
() :3 x
Cl (1) U\
O:)IT
:3 IT :)
00&
~ ....... U\
~ ~ 0
(1)\U\S
\S ~ ~
o \S \U
\SOrt
oITrt
U\rt:T
(1) - (1)
~~\S
~ 0
~ \S
(1) (1)
~ ri-
:) '<
&
:)
(1)
z
o
-i
-i
o
(Jl
()
)>
hi
cn Project Iltlel
:::r
ro
(l)
<+
HADEN FLACE
z NSIGIIBOmlOOD MODEL APPLICATION
o
White Hall District, Albemarle County, Virginia
.
Oro.wlng Htlel
M3(
O>::r
--- -
:;
[\)
=r
4' Shoulder )>
Q' I~l 0
Ui \J rn
rt-
:; 6 .II/' Z
~ Q'
[\) Ui
~\l. IT r
~:;
~~ ~~ )>
I\)
\l. -I\)
~ (l)\l. Z
---
ii. ~
rt-
::r ii. rn
rt-
::r
f ff1r
"'f"'\>~) i;,'
"'."
'" V~I 1'.1 ..:;),.^..... !:t-~t~
~~\t_.t~-~~_,~...~'t. ~> . >,
~. . ~-~ .~:-t.;: >'v
,.?<;:t~i;.~~~t1 q'~~:-:~j
(;,
70
rn~
V>_
-(j)
0-\
rn -
zz
()GJ
rn
rne Nol'l('l ~i:~.'E.9.i:MP:.;},,~~
Proposed Off site Road improvements
Drulng $Co.lel No.. "l~' 'ir;~te Dra.wn By' ,.1(::
Oa.tPI
!l9.2Uir)
Chprkf!d BYl .J(~
ProJp.ct No.. ~~u?,;'I
/Urn
rnX
(j)-
-(j)
0-\
rn -
zz
()GJ
rn
--'
OJ'.:
PROPERTY
LINE
PROPERTY
LINE
D omll1lon
Developrnent
ReaouJ'c~s. LLC
I 72 500th r .:m~Ol't Df~
Ct.ltrictt4"W1UI.i, W~ :~?l' I I
4.~4.979.01;!1 (r)
4~4.9!~.'Ce.1 m
DI)R,V.....cCNf'l
u.)['\) Z
0)>90
-. =rr--t
<:-(')rn
C\) :3 =>
~~:J(j)
tlJ -. C\)
,<OUl
<
(') C\) :3
c :3 tlJ
< C\) '<
(ll :J
-. rr -.
rr Ul (ll
~Ul Ul ~
:3 => -,
tlJ tlJ (ll
\)'\)'Ul
o C\) 0
X tlJ :3
~ ~ (ll
~ ~ :3
C\) -, 0
rro~
~ (i -+.
Ul ~ ()
=>\)'~
tlJ '< 6
\)'5~
(ll & rr
:3 :J 0
o - rr
< tlJ _
(ll 0 (ll
~ C\) :J
rr~ rr
o ~ 0
tlJ rr C\)
(') :3 ~
(') C\) Ul
o :J rr
:3 rr :J
00&
~ -+. Ul
~::;o
(lltlJ~
~~(ll
-. ~ Ul
o 0 tlJ
~ ;+ rr
o tlJ rr
Ulrr=>
(ll - C\)
~g~
s' 0
~ ~
(ll C\)
~ ;+
:J '<
&
=~[w
3~
:;
(1)
41 Shoulder
Q1
Ui
.-.-
:;
tSl
/U
.l\
::r
rr
,
Q,
~
'<
Q'
Ui
.-.-
~:;
lJ
-,
o
o
lJl
(1)
~I.'..
~~
<u
CI-
~
ii
.....
::r
~~
-"
(!)CI-
'"'5:
CI-
.-.-
::r
:J
(ll
z
o
-l
-l
o
(Jl
o
)>
~
>
OJ
-J
en Project IItle'
::,--
'"
(U
0-+
HADEN PLACE
Dr-Qwlng "H"tl!:l
i : !
/Urn
rnX
lD_
-lD
0-1
rn -
zz
nC0
rn
PROPERTY
LINE
?\
r
r
o
rn
rn
70
r
)>
z
rn
PROPERTY
LINE
~~
U1_
-t.n
0-\
rn -
zz
nC0
rn
Proposed Offslte Road improvements
Dom:n'on
Devft!oprnent
Resources. LLC
z NEIGIIBormooD MODEL ilPPLTCtmON
o
Whit" Thll District, Alhcffi&rlc County Virginia
DrG..Wlng Scc.lel !oklO -t.,l ~k~h~
rite ~Jo.Me= :i:~.'i.S.Z~.JA.;l~:~
Dll1;pl
0'3.2:.::&
PfOJP.r.i No.. :1~2;;
,"/.-
.. " ""
/ "~
r-I ~~
-~
~~~
:Irn
-,170
----1-\ ~ 0
'70
--;- ~ 0
..:5s;:
-~_ z
I rn '
..' - . --,
.~_.,......,.o__.. ..-....
. OJ
~
~
-,
I:l..
-n
iii
I:l..
~
-==u
1---1]
r"
--<I:
o
-_.,jl
:I
rr~
l~
'" u
S '0
'"
e'
'"
0
'"
0
GO
0
'"
0
.
.
~
-----700
~~rn
W.....n
- ~ 0
:IZ7O
-{-)>
........z-{
0-
~~
)>
.
.
700 11~
~rn 70-
)>n rnUl
-0 :I-{
~~ d~
z-{
0- ~~ 700
~~ z-{ ~rn ~
)> -{rn )>n
. -0
. )>70 ~~ ~
N Ul.
Ulz Z
I rnrn 0- 0
~ ~)> ~~ ~
:I OJz )>
.:j ~O .
.
----- rn
I\) 70
I C
U1 Z
rn
:I ':::1
.:j 0
OJ
rn
70
rn
.
0
n
~
rn
0
........
__Ie}!\)'"
':.::<11
'fJ1
\ \<-
". -00-..
UlUl~
rn)>_
~ZUl
- --1
-{ --
7O)>z
~0
~,:
8
f,Jt
""'If;
~
.~
.1 '
- I<
"
GO,
~~B
(pZ'
:r>-g
n"n
~no
~~o
---.JU'),
. ~"
-rT\\p
........$:-{
--1m
OUl
-{
IJO
070
~~
.<::
r: )>
Ul --l
rn
n70
~
~J
---
. '~~,
------..
A
o
z
n
s;:~rn
-()>::Q
O-{c
crn)>
--1 70 .
~~
7O-{
rnrn
G;:I~~
~d~Ul
~~)>=:J
OJzzz
~-{00
:--~
-----
(j)
Ul~~
rn-Ul
<~-{
<;;.)>-
rnAlZ
7O~0
- ~ ~
Dnl..inQ Title!
Dominion
Development
R8tIOurces, LLC
I 72 ~ ........ "'-
Charbtta\llle. VA 2291 I
<43-lJ.9791.& 121 Cpt
.!l<4,979. ,,& I III
ODttVA..cc:.I
::>
--:t
C/) P,.oj~d Title'
[ HADEN PLACE
I'D
r+
Z NEIGHBORHOOD MODEL APPLICATION
o
White Hall District, Albemarle County, Virginia
~,'Q;J::-)/,~
t/ ~~ ,~
~ ~~; ~
..... ~j ;;:t
.-:'z- & ~ .~
0. M ,.....
1-~_ :::rJ i>'
~>f' \11\-\'')
........
CONCEPTUAL GRADING $ UTILITIES
Df"0..11l9 S[ole' As Shown Dnnm By' JKS
Fie Nor'IE" 55-69-ZHA,dwg
'"
"
Dote.
09,21.06
Checkpd By. ..I<S
ProJect No.. 5020
~~k?t~~f::7i1i~~r7~rnf,;;:J'.l~l<':'!","":,,~':~!~\:':'~:"'!.l"":" , .' '\'\,'li,Vi\':i "'"
>-
-.)
~ P,'oject Title'
<1l
<1l
c->-
HADEN PLACE
NEIGHBORHOOD MODEL APPLICATION
z
o
'it' ""';1',"",," ;"'~\~~'1'f~t:\11W'r""'''1l''-'''~'~''''''~ - ..
OJ
" \l
---------
.~. ~- r:-;;C~::::-.>..~ !
-~ h 7----~::::-~:~ ;=~)______
." T> .. ...........-/ -- _
..... ~ '.' ~L---!.~~-=-~~~~~_~~~_ ---
. ':"-""-...,.: ,f -.----.
'__ \'''\.1'''''''''-, ......,......"....
--.---
. -~.''--.1~,,--c=.. h
I' '.
r '.
:~~m0~', J"--r-=='~- .
I ~J!lm ..' -, -'~,.-,.-.~,-- ~~_.__
! ..., ,,'-~
o:~Jtt}.I-\JNIN(:c" /'"
-- ----:.--2:. d .::"-~v~iL?:.._~_.o;;:~?:..c~.
= -I if I
, , II ,=, ,
"'il,y"D
l...~.\) (~))
"=--...,,;;,::.- ~=:::-
-' / \ \
... \\I~I'--J"-'
----
--
1 F'
~f'
,J ~I
Rivet
:) 7 ,h)'1 h
-,~ I).
~ 0
~
o
,~
'"
'-'
o
--+--
!
I}r, ! I
'..:5
" .0
'. (5
!
! OJ
~ I'..)
:=J
I /
/
// /
/
( x ).1
C,) ~
-+-"
(_n -
---J I
)>
--r
- j""
-.--------
lOA
G
-=:
-,--,
(I)
() :2.~1
..----
~ ~ \
O\\...\!~
\ j\,IO\"'::> ..J
..---
-------
/'
Dnlwil19 Title'
----.::::::."
/
/
/
/
/
"
'-.,:-'
'-
!
(,-",
.1..":
--=l',
o !
!;,
-1---
CONCEPTUAL OFF51TE DRAINAGE
Hall District. Albemarle County, Virginia Dr..lng Scot., A, Sho."
09.11.06
Doh>l
ne HoME" 5S-69-lHA.dwg
ProJpct NO,I 5020
1>,:,'", ,~~,!..",,~..,~'o'(""""""''''''''''':':''''''''-:'''''''''''~~'''''''''''''''''_il<'<'','I'~7"):':"'~'~":'~"".':':"-~'''''''l'''':'''''0'':'''"'''~""WI" ',,'\' ,
--~'--
--~---_._-------
''---------..
" '
!
!
--1
---l
"........
\l
j-~i
I~c.
L=)
CD ~.
nU
+--
-----I
1-._h~~J ,
~I
I I.
=:J
-.~
--'
-----.
(~)
1_'
(I)
r-)
CD
---
/
r. :> /
~ I !
') /
u /
...-------------
----------~
~----
-------
o
ITl
---l
s:
U
--'."
~
o
~
I
-f.:o.
(~
0>
I
~
(J)
)>
Dominion
Deve'Dpnlent
R...,.,,.,... LLC
':"'~U~:'~;l\l'ftt: .~::. f,),:,:; ';:;\ '~\~t~?'0;;~! j
""\W"'~I"" 1
;i
,~
~.... ~\. \
""." ~
'\' .;;:\
\\
~
~-
.-...
OJ
t>J
t>J
,
Q
('I ~
'It ~
. - ---J~
.!"'"'',
>irj?l',~
.
.
. '''''''~'~-~b.'
, i';'''V'."''''\'I~''''~1f,*',,'N'!''" 'r-""''''r'''T~l''''. '".
liL
'1 ,If!
I,', r',"!:"",~
~~~"""''''''''!''''''''''''''''''''':'~'''~'':"'''~~.,..,..,...~~.''1''1"''"''"'~''''''':''_'''\''''
I
(j)::::J
-0
)>0
nZ
[R(j)
-1
~
~
o
0' ~:ril
&r:rififif=~~
-~tl.tl.f}f}Cb~
OCbCbCb:JCb:JrTI
(jf:J:J:J\J'lU-;
rt:3!:3!~"'lU:J \J
Cblll~(')('):JCb>
Cb (') Cb Cb Cb Cb Ul 2tl
.....Cb~~?Ul-n~
\Jri1ZlJ1<::OJOZ
~ III 0 \II ~ 0 , (j)
5~~~~t::"'~..
~'il\-~UlUlX.lJI
"<Ul-n-nlJl
~-n>>
~>b5"
~ 5"..........
Ul ..... lJI lJI
OJ lJI
o
~
Ul
~
7':rS2
~=~-;
O~ tl. Cb (5
:J 0 ~ :J Z
Ul \II , ,>
rtCblUIIl,
~tl.:J~O
.....b'~-:um
Jl5 \J~-;
ii-CbSIn~
:Jg.fi~rT1
~O~-U-;
., -0 (U -0
/Il III i;l ~
2~ib8
tl.~U;Z
-:u Ul 11 ~
~ 11 ~
f ~ Ul
\J Ul
III
~
~
Ul
\l
III
(')
Cb
Ul
o
o
Z
(j)
-1
~
~
(j)
-0
)>
n
[R
~..,\\
"'''.'' \~
lJ)
C
~
~
rn
70
11
o
70
o
);:
z
rn
/ I I, ~ ~
</ I. <.'
,',; //
'/ /' i'
-/./
//;/"}
ii'
/.'1 /.~'
l/.. I' ,,/ /l , "
"/, II; iA' ,
/7/ /' ; 'I I/; flj,. " .'
11// ' M ,~, ..' "'" /, 1/;'
/,./(1/;/,,/ .;. Ii : / iJ1~',' '>'<, " ,I.,',' <"__ .'/1')/ .'
1// /' .'f /;,' "~'>, fY;~ ~' '.' '; "" /.' ~f:I,';'
, .: //../'/ jl /j I/.' ~]f ? '~"~ / ?/j,~. // " _"" ,,<' / , ~__
,. /1/,/ (/1 ,. 1/' " .'/"""'((jf,', ~t/' _~ ';-' '/ (j/ ,'.,:,. #; ".,.,."
" /. '1/ /,' '1/' / '. ";'"Z'" I. ~'~ 1// ',,',, ',"" ( j /
//>'/' h' '" ". .~, ", ". ", ".
,,4, '" 'I fj " . 'f'. / ./ >', , '. .
.,' .,.., :1/j' . ., .t,'''~'' Ih" <. I / '-... / '
;; j, ... " '':;",~ 40'~ ...... {f "
,'l , /' Y);~'~~;i?'l;,~'~" " ",,,j/;r "
:' ',1 I, {j' .:. /'f/'/f!/t1/; '..'
j <'co.)". .. '/'0;, ", !. ':c &
\; -~~:"'St"iO;;'" ,: ""'" "w'.'lr-: ([j;i.'/
: - ~ ~~'~'::<1.."?:(~~,", ':", !f!/~:-::'- / .
....., '-'" '<- .. ", '"., 'H'>.".. .
-....q}(~ """, r{",,,, , "~'"-.I ""''i'
'4....Q)~.""-.C I "" "'''~<. ~t:, ,. "'. . ..
""I(-~' /_ ,_, >'{(~>-""
- .
. .
........~...... -/
, ---..
)
---
:'0'''--7 ,
' .
. .
I
./ .I
, ,
" !
/ ,f
, 'L.~-~""'~_~_.i.
R,or--
l)j. ,
,';; \
iL / II
'~'..J..._.
w
o
"- --
-------- ,
>...~
""?~.,,"
, ,,/~' HADEN LANt -
r--~.
.,.~ ..... - - ------ -
o
(j)Z
-olll
)>-1
n~
[R~
-r~"~'~~~
m
o
'~"-
<D
o
. .'~.. -.
- 1'--. ....'
I .~ -,
~*
~
Doow;"9 ];tl. I Parking Layout
Conceptua
>
ex:>
HADEN PLACE
ODEL APPLICATION ..
NEIGHBORHOOD M 'J County, VirglI1la
Z , t AlbemEll. e
o White Hall Distnc , .
Dominion
Development
R"sou...,... LLC
112~~~
~...,'-
.4.S4 ,.." f'Q~ :fit
"!IA. oO.:v...~
D,-awing Scal+?' Aj Shown
[)-O-WIl By, .J<S
Chpch>d By' .-'<$
ne Nw'le' 5S-69-ZMA.dwg
Project No.' 5020
Date'
09.2106
r.'~
! ~-.
I
.
~!D.
f't"f
0rA;t"
+-
L'"lCl
~J("r_
"1./1,)
('i) (".':"-
,")) ()
I
!
ell l_YI
---.,Ijl
en
li) r ,',
D
o },
1-) ,-,
ITI
I
i
I
+-
(Jlf..:)
.z~;r
(0(,,0
(\j "J~"
1I))> J
~) (-,
/
/
.
.
I
I
I
--~
--
~ I~w
>0
Z ..",
> ,-
'j' G) 5:
Q~~
Crn---i
=<~RJ
I
I~~O -- __
S'~~:r:- -- __
II-.'U __
'_01:(, ~..
------
-------
I))
If) .t-'
_0 I,
i
I
--
~ ~- i
'- '--------- --
"-. -----------.
'--,
I
I
I
I
I
~-
--.
~-,
~--
ill j:..(:J
.0 "
I
I
I
lJ
.70
o
'lJ
o
In
g
()
o
2:
2:
rn
()
o
.70
.70
~
CJ
I
I
i
+-
lfl'-:;'
~~ f:;: r-
OJ I~,) ()
(n fe,.....
---
---.
I
::.. I
------
---- -----
__ -~-~ -- -~ I
-- ~,-------------
---
+-
(nO
9;;:c-
COWL!
<..nOD.......
(J) ~C> -J.o..
-PC)
--
--
, -~----
- -----
--
I
I
-
+-
cno
0'
-+>- fJ'r
eTl ~~:;2
m(:J
i
I
I
I
i
I
I
i
----------- ~, ~- I
- ---- ----------.......
-'- ---------
--
'--
---
,-
(II .P ........
D ,-)
, -----'------.~,
-----------. -'-
--- -- ------
;:;'
-------
'-, -----
---
I ~-
I
I I I
l69 I I I
........(-'Ir .;;:
LJ {::.o I <DO I
;0(\.)........ c.,'
il:(~ I 0'.>-1(-
. +>. 0
"/N~
" I (~Icn I
,'. I 'II bf\-.)
.c i~'
L I I
I
-- I I
--
I
I
I
I
.p.
cno
GC,J
-Ol.,.jl
Cbf\..J 0
U1(Q .--..
(/I )> C.-,
..Q :J
--
--
UI :5
()
~
~
w
0
'"
0
<0 +-
0
;:;'
--
f --
--
I
\ ~--
I ,"'
cnO
-.lCA
\ cnL1r
-> GIO
I cn Nr0'.......
.f'"9 In " ~
~trir- / .p ,:,
I t~~
(fl );.. ^' /
.on
f ~.
/
--
- -
/
I
I
I
~-
~,
I
J
J
I
I
I
>
~
C/J P,"ojo?d Title'
::Y'
ro
CD
...
D,-owing Titre'
Dott-'l
DI17,06
rip th...... 55-6'<- !KA.~
..
'72 ~ ....... "-
.VA1~11
""_'UZI ...
"".1~1 ftl
[:lOC:VA,,"*
z
o
HADEN PLACE:
NEIGHBOlmOOD MODEL APPLICATION
p
Dominion
Developfn&n,
R...........,... llC
R-4 (EXISTING ZONING) LAYOUT
While {all Dislricl, Albemarle County, Virginia
DrQwing SColE'1 As Shown
PrOjo?'::t "'."), :)).!O
(fJ (,.l
" 0
,.
~
Co>
0,
f5
'"
'"
$:Ul
)>---1
zO
11~~
)>['11<
Q$:);;
'['11---1
~Z['11
-<---170
:g -.~--
>
~
c::>
(f) PI'oj~d Title>:
:::r
<'D
<'D
,+
{t2/D.
':, f'f'f
"'~, ,",?1~f'
l'
,/
'~'""",,/i( "
",' ~ /
, '-... ..
, : :/ .c:
/
~,
"
~---.,
::,/ ......~",,\
i K
"~
'~
1
L
U
1
i i
, !
o 01
I I ,
L_ _.J I r
L__
\"""-'-.J'-f"!
Dr'nwtll9 Titlel
HADEN PLACE
NEIGHBOHHOOD MODEL APPLICATION
PREVIOUS APPLICATION PLAN
.....A:.U-C
1l!f_'_,_
tilt:.. _~'j
__,ft"" ..
......:9t"9,..\_~!,.
--
z
o
While Hall Dislricl, Albemarle County, Virginia
'~"":;\.fK' .WI:' ~~(t
Dr-n..-ing SC(lle" As $t-";::'lln [."""''I')~'' _..:
'I,t "'\I~"l!- ~::--'1''''''~''''''*
Dote' (1-<<11(0; Cr..-c~?j Ell' ...:
.
.
.
Attachment 0
COMMUNITY OF CROZET
9/27/2006
Summary of Existing & Potential Dwelling Units Reviewed and/or Approved
Since Crozet Master Plan Adoption on 12/1/04
EXISTING DWELLING UNITS
Number of Existing Dwelling units as of 8106*
Total
Units
1875
, Includes all dwelling units that have been issued CO's as of 8/06.
POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS
APPROVED FINAL PLATS & SITE PLANS (12/1/04 to present)- No CO's as of 8/06
SUB 04-136
SUB 04-102
SOP 05-17
SUB 05-391
SUB05-113
Ballard Field (Old Trail by-right)
Upper Ballard Field (Old Trail by-right)
Ballard Field Townhouses (Old Trail by-right)
Old Trail Creekside II-Phase 1-Final (bY-right)
Westhalll & II (SF)
Units
47*'
40**
8**
35
49
179
Total
"This number is the total remaining potential dwelling units that have not received CO's in these sections.
APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLATS & SITE PLANS SUBJECT TO FINAL APPROVAL
SUB 05-259 Old Trail Creekside II (Other than Phase 1)
SUB 05-229 Clayton
SUB 05-146 Westhall Phase III
SUB 06-104 West End at Western Ridge
SOP 05-90 Westhall Phase IV
61
27
9
16
36
149
Total
ZMA 04-24
ZMA04-17
ZMA 05-05
ZMA 05-18
ZMA 06-01
REZONINGS APPROVED SINCE CROZET MASTER PLAN ADOPTED -NUMBER OF UNITS
Units
2275
107
51
106
36
2575
Old Trail Village*
Wickham Pond'
Liberty Hall*
Wickham Pond II
Westhall Phase V
Total
-Number of Umts/Lots on PRELIMINARY Plats and Site Plans UNDER REVIEW for these rezoned areas
SOP 06-65 Old Trail Village (phase I) 51
SOP 06-72 Old Trail Village (Phase II-Block 11) 54
SOP 06-78 Old Trail Village (Block 12) 90
SOP 06-06 Wickham Pond 107
SOP 06-70 Liberty Hall 51
REZONINGS UNDER REVIEW -NUMBER OF UNITS
lMAG2-0~
ZMA 05-07
lMAO&-Q;3
Units
600
34
00
34
FootfHJj~~-witMfaWR
Haden Place
Jafffiafl-+HIt( doforrod indofinitoly)
Total
NOTE In addition to the above listed projects, there are additional dwelling units that can be created by-right
based on zoinig that has eXisted since prior to 12/1/04.
Attachment A
.
Proffer Form
Date:
October 2.2006
Albemarle County Revisions: 10/05/06
ZMA: 2005-0007
Tax Map and Parcel Numbers: 55-69 and 56-9
,6.69 Acres to be rezoned from R2 to NMD (Neighborhood Model District)
in accordance with the Application Plan titled Haden Place, dated September 4.2006
And prepared by Dominion Development Resources. LLC
Pursuant to Section 33.3 ofthe Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance, the owner, or its duly
authorized agent, hereby voluntarily proffers the conditions listed below which shall be applied to
the property, if rezoned. These conditions are proffered as a part ofthe requested rezoning and it is
agreed that: (1) the rezoning itself gives rise to the need for the conditions; and (2) such conditions
have a reasonable relation to the rezoning request.
1) Construction of Off-Site Improvements: As a condition of final subdivision plat or final
site plan approval for any development within Haden Place (as depicted on the Application
. Plan), the Applicant shall design and construct at its sole expense the following:
a. Haden Lane Road Widening: Haden Lane, from the southern boundary of Haden
Place to Jarmans Gap Road, shall be widened to a minimum pavement width of 18'
and shoulders and ditches shall be installed to the extent allowed within the existing
right-of-way. The improvements shall be designed and constructed to the satisfaction
of the County Engineer.
b. Killdeer Lane Road Widening: Killdeer Lane, from the southern boundary of
Haden Place to Jarmans Gap Road, shall be widened to a minimum pavement width
of 18' and shoulders and ditches shall be installed to the extent allowed within the
existing right-of-way. The necessary road width and design shall complement
improvements and widening that may occur on Killdeer Lane as a result of other
ongoing development proposals. The improvements shall be designed and
constructed to the satisfaction of the County Engineer.
Vehicular connection from Haden Lane to Killdeer Lane shall be prohibited until
such time that sight distance improvements, acceptable to the Virginia Department of
Transportation, are made to the intersection of Killdeer Lane and Jarmans Gap Road.
.
c. Stormwater Drainage to Powell's Creek: The Owner shall not request that the
County issue a building permit within Haden Place prior to the construction or
bonding of an off-site stormwater drainage system to Powell's Creek in general
accord to that shown on the General Development Plan.
~s
Haden Place
Wendell Gibson, Inc.
Proffer Form
Page I 00
Attachment A
Construction of offsite improvements shall be completed, to the satisfaction of the
appropriate authority no later than 12 months after approval of the first subdivision plat
or site plan within Haden Place.
2) Future Dedications for Inter-parcel Connectivity with Ballard Fields and/or
Realignment of Killdeer Lane:
Upon the request of Albemarle County, portions of the open space area shown as "Block J"
on sheet A5.l shall be dedicated to public use, as necessary, and made available for inter-
parcel vehicular and/or pedestrian connection to the adjoining Ballard Fields Subdivision
and lor for future realignment of Killdeer Lane. Locations of the inter-parcel connection and
realignment are shown conceptually on the General Development Plan.
a. Final location for dedication of the inter-parcel connection will be determined as a
condition of first subdivision plat or first site plan approval for any development
within Haden Place. Upon the request of Albemarle County, the Owner shall design
and construct at its sole expense the inter-parcel vehicular connection to the southern
property line adjoining Ballard Fields Subdivision. Said construction shall be
completed, to the satisfaction of the appropriate authority, no later than 12 months
after approval of the final subdivision plat or final site plan approval for lots within
Blocks C, D, E, F, or G as shown on the General Development Plan.
b. At the request of Albemarle County, the Owner shall provide future dedications, as
necessary, to allow realignment of Killdeer Lane as a connection to Ballard Fields
Subdivision.
c. If the land dedicated in Proffer 2a and 2b is not used for its stated purpose within 10
years of dedication, then the Owner may pursue vacation or abandonment of the
dedicated rights-of-way.
3) Cash Proffers:
The Owner shall contribute a total of $82,000 cash for the purpose of mitigating traffic
impacts from the development. The cash contribution shall be used only for the purpose of
funding transportation projects identified in the County's Capital Improvements Program
within the Community of Crozet. The cash contribution shall be paid in increments of
$3,200 for each detached market rate unit and $2,700 for each market rate attached unit, prior
to or at the time of issuance of the building permit for each unit. If this cash contribution has
not been exhausted by the County for the stated purpose wi thin ten (10) years from the date
of the last payment of the contribution, all unexpended funds shall be applied to project(s)
identified in the County's Capital Improvements Program within the Community ofCrozet.
Haden Place
Proffer Form
.
.
.
~s(o
.
.
.
Attachment A
4) Affordable Housing: The Owner shall provide six (6) "for sale" residential units of
affordable housing in Haden Place as identified on the Application Plan. The Owner shall
convey the responsibility of constructing the affordable units to any subsequent purchaser of
the subject property. The current Owner or subsequent Owner shall create units affordable to
households with incomes less than 80% of the area median income, such that housing costs
consisting of principal, interest, real estate taxes and homeowner's insurance (PITI) do not
exceed 30% of the gross household income. The Albemarle County Office of Housing or its
designee shall approve all purchasers of these units. The Owner/builder shall provide the
County or its designee a period of 180 days to identify and pre-qualify an eligible purchaser
for the affordable units. The ISO-day period shall commence upon written notice from the
Owner that the units will be available for sale. This notice shall not be given more than 120
days prior to anticipated receipt of the certificate of occupancy. If the County or its designee
does not provide a qualified purchaser during this period, the Owner shall have the right to
sell the unites) without any restriction on sales price or income of purchaser. This proffer
shall apply only to the first sale of each of the six (6) units.
5) Historic Resources: As a condition of the first preliminary subdivision plat or preliminary
site plan approval for any development within Haden Place, the Owner shall provide a
reconnaissance level survey performed by an architectural historian or other qualified
individual, to adequately provide an archival record of the existing homestead. The survey
shall meet the requirements of the Virginia Department of Historic Resources
Reconnaissance Survey Field Form, and results shall be included in the Haden Place Code of
Development.
6) Final Grading Plan: For any subdivision not requiring a site development plan, the Owner
shall submit a Final Grading Plan to the satisfaction of the County Engineer. The Owner
shall obtain approval of the Final Grading Plan by the County Engineer before the first final
subdivision plat or site plan is approved within Haden Place. The Owner shall not request
that a Certificate of Occupancy be issued for a dwelling unit on a lot if the County Engineer
has determined the lot grading is not consistent with the approved grading plans.
~ -t/ IL
JeHlel! 0. C h-J
Printed Name of Owner
/0 - Or-06
Date
Signature of Owner
BD s -7
Haden Place
Wf'nrlf'll Gihsnn Tnr.
Proffer Foml
Page 3 of3
JOHN K. 'D.OOART, III
MoB. GJIlIlON.Jll.
TlIOloWl E.. A1..Bao
PA11UC1A D. McGRAW
R. LEIl LIVINOSTON
RACHEL L. RUST
Pm!IlJ. CARAMANl8
LAW OFFICES
TREMBLAY & SMITH, LLP
P. O. Box 1585
CHARLO'ITESVlLLE. VIRGINIA 22902-1585
105.109 E. HIGH STREET
1r~ONE(434)977~55
FACSlMILB (434) 979.1221
TRAC'I!Y C. HOPPER
NArnAN J. D. V!LDHUlS
I\HrwD
Eo GIlIlALD 'I'lUD.IBLAY
1921 . 200l
LLOYD T. SMmt. Jll.
November 1, 2006
Richard E. Carter, Esq.
Zunka, Milnor, Carter & Inigo, Ltd.
414 Park Street
Charlottesville, VA 22902
RE: Beights Development I Wendell W. Gibson, Inc.
Dear Rick:
Thanks for your letter of October 6, 2006. Your letter mentioned Mr. Gibson's plans for Haden
Place having been approved, but it is my understanding that when the application went before the Board
of Supervisors a couple weeks ago, it did not receive approval. I understand that it has been deferred.
As I stated the last time we spoke, I believe it would be beneficial to Mr. Gibson's application to
show an actual connection will be made from Haden Place to Summerford Lane, not just a road built to
Mr. Gibson's property line. Beights Development is willing to allow that connection if Mr. Gibson is willing
to construct it as his expense.
I just wanted to let you know the opportunity is still available if, given the status of the Haden
Place application, Mr. Gibson now has a greater iriterest in pursuing this possibility.
Best regards.
Very truly yours,
~
Peter J. Caramanis
cc: Justin Beights (via e-mail)
.
Attachment B
Haden Place
Neighborhood Model District
Code of Development
October 2,2006
Revised by Albemarle County on October 5, 2006
Prepared by
Dominion Development Resources, LLC
For.
Wendell Gibson, Inc.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I
I
Table of Contents
Part 1: Introduction
History of Application.. .... . . . .. . .. .. . . .. . .. . .. . .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. . .. . .. . .. . .. .... .. .. . .. . .. . .. .. . ....1
Regional Justification............................................................................. ....2
Existing Site Conditions................................... ....................................... ....2
Neighborhood Model Principles.... ............................................................. ....3
Infrastructure.................. ..................................................................... ....6
'Transportation............................................................................ ....6
Stormwater Management............................................................... ....6
Water and Sewer............."...... ....................... ............................. .....7
Part 2: The Code of Development
Illustrative Plan..... .. . ...... .... ......"............................. ...... ......... .. . ... .. ....... ..8
General Development Plan... . .. . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. .. . . . . . .. . ... . .. . ..8
Land Use........ .................................................................................... ....9
Open Space and Amenities........................................................... ..11
Historic Resources. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12
Architectural and Landscape Standards. . ..... . . . .. . . .. .... . .. . .. .. .. .. . .. . . .. .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . ..12
General Architectural Style... .... ................ .......................... ............ . ..12
Form, Massing, and Proportions. . . . . .. . ... . .. . .. . .. . .... . .. . .. . . . . .. . .. . .. . .. . . . . .. . .. . ..12
Materials and Colors. . . . . .. . . . . ..... . .... . .. . .. . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . . .. .. . .. . . . . ..13
Roof Pitch and Form.. . . . .... . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . ..... .. . .. . . .. .. . . .. . .. . .. . . .. .. . .. .. . . ..14
Ornamentation................................ ............................................. ..14
Streets cape Treatments.................................................................. ..14
Lighting....... ................... ....... .............. ................ ....... .................. ...... ..14
Landscaping. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15
Architectural Review Committee..... ..... . ... . .. .... ......... ..... .... ......... .. .......... .. . ..15
Part 3: Supporting Photographs
Existing Conditions (Neighborhood)... ................................................ ......... .17
Existing Conditions (Site)......................................................................... .19
Village Home Examples.............. ..... ...................................................... ...20
Cottage Examples................................................................................ ...21
Community Green Example..... . .......... .............. ...... ...... ............... ......... .... .22
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
it
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
Part 1: Introduction
History of Application:
In January 2004, a local development firm purchased 6.69 Acres (the Haden Place
Property). An R-2 single-family detached development plan was submitted to Albemarle
County for review. In January 2005, Wendell Gibson, Inc. (the applicant) purchased the
property from the local developer. Mr. Gibson is a local residential builder who lives in
Western Albemarle County and has been building in the Crozet Growth area for several
years. After a pre-application conference and several additional meetings with
Community Development Staff, Mr. Gibson was advised that a pre-application submittal
to the Planning Commission would not be required and that County Staff could support a
rezoning application to Neighborhood Model District. ZMA 2005-0007 was submitted
on May 31,2005 proposing a 40-unit Neighborhood Model District for the property.
During the application review, several questions arose regarding: the requirement of
offsite road improvements, the requirement for on site private road frontage, the Crozet
Master Plan guidelines for affordable housing and density provisions, and the treatment
of the existing 1882 house. A Planning commission work session was held on September
13,2005 and addressed these topics. Additionally, the Planning Commission
recommended that the proposed layout should address the integration with Ballard Fields
development, being built on the adjoining property to the south. The ZMA application
was resubmitted on January 18,2006 following the recommendations from the
September 13 work session. In February of2006, Mr. Gibson was notified that the
Crozet Master Plan interpretation of allowable densities had been revised to reflect net
acreage (interpreted as 80% of gross) and the current application (dated October 2,2006)
is based on a net acreage of 5.35 acres.
Page 1 of 22
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Regional Justification:
In the Application Plan, sheet A-4 shows the relationship of the property to regional
facilities and services in the area. As Haden Place is located near the center of the Crozet
Growth Area, the following distances to and from regional facilities, services, and
districts are of note:
l.
')
L..
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Crozet Elementary School:
Brownsville Elementary School:
Future Elementary School site:
Henley Middle School:
Western Albemarle High School:
Crozet Volunteer Fire Department:
Western Albemarle Rescue Squad:
Jefferson Madison Regional Library:
U.S. Post Office
Downtown Crazet Business District:
Western Park (Old Trail):
Claudius Crazet Park:
Future Eastern Park:
Rt. 240 Industrial/Commercial Center:
Old Trail Commercial Center:
Route 250 Commercial Center:
0.7 miles
0.9 miles
1.25 miles
0.9 miles
1.1 miles
0.6 miles
0.4 miles
0.4 miles
0.3 miles
0.2 miles
0.3 miles
0.6 miles
1.6 miles
1.0 miles
0.4 miles
1.6 miles
While all of the above services, facilities, and districts serve the entire regional
population of Western Albemarle County, the quality and quantity of the services and
necessary infrastructure is directly dependant on the travel distances required. For
example, residents at Haden Place could walk to school, work, the post office, a park,
shops, or a restaurant.
Existing Site Conditions:
The existing site is 6.69-acres. There is 460 feet of existing road frontage on Haden Lane
and 575 feet of existing road frontage on Killdeer Lane. There is 30 feet of fall from the
high point (northwest comer) of the property to the low point (southeast comer) ofthe
property. A poorly defined ridge runs from Northwest to Southeast and divides the site
into two drainage areas of approximately 6.1 acres and 0.6 acres. The typical slope of the
land is about 4%. There are 5 areas, totaling 4,970 square feet (more or less), on the site
with slopes greater than 25%. Three quarters of these "steep slopes" are within an
existing wooded area at the southwest comer of the site. Approximately 18 % of the site,
lying in the southwest comer along Killdeer Lane, is wooded and contains the steepest
topography. The existing trees in this area are mixed hardwoods with trunk diameters of
6-18" on average. The remainder of the site is open with a ground cover of fescue. There
is an existing vacated homesite on the east side of the property. The homesite includes a
I
I
Page 2 of 22
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
a future dedication could provide additional connectivity and realignments
through the pocket park.
Parks and Open Space as Amenities: Conceptual calculations show that the
area required for a water quality bio-filter is 5,300 square feet. The graded area in
the pocket park is approximately 26,000 square feet and the tree conservation area
is approximately 13,000 square feet. This provides unique opportunity to provide
stormwater management that is blended in a landscaped passive park setting
adjacent to a substantial stand of existing hardwoods. A footpath, benches, and a
picnic pavilion will be provided to further enhance this open space as an amenity.
The "green" at Haden Place creates a vehicular turnaround that functions
differently from the traditional cul-de-sac. The paved area measures 90 feet by 92
feet with an 18 foot deep parking bay on one end. A 2,800 square foot landscaped
green is located in the center of the paved area. The result is a narrow, one-way
travel isle with lawn area that is shared by the community.
The 10,600 square foot open space "buffer" along the northern perimeter of the
site provides screening from existing adjoining residences, greater building
setbacks for the 4-unit townhomes, and community area for playground
equipment, gardens, and I or lawn space.
Neighborhood Centers: The 1.04 acre pocket park provides a neighborhood
center (on a residential and pedestrian scale) for Haden Place, Ballard Fields, and
the existing residences on Haden Lane and Killdeer Lane. The Green on Haden
Place provides a similar neighborhood center for the residents on Haden Place.
Buildings and spaces of human scale: Twenty of the proposed 34 residences are
single-family detached homes with front widths of 32 feet or less. The remaining
14 proposed units are designed as 3 blocks oftownhomes separated by a
pedestrian oriented streetscape. The largest building footprints on the Application
Plan are 2 five-residence townhouse building of approximately 4,500 Square feet.
These buildings, along with the green space on Haden Lane and the pocket park
across the connector road create a neighborhood design that focuses on the
neighbors rather than the through traffic and vehicular access.
Relegated Parking: All off street parking for Haden Place is relegated to the rear
alleys. Some on street parallel parking is provided for guests on all streets. In
addition rear-loaded surface parking is located to provide minimal visual impact
from nearby public and private streets.
Mixture of Uses and Use Types: Earlier versions ofthe Application Plan
provided for a greater flexibility of commercial uses allowed on the first floor of
the proposed townhomes. As the zoning regulations in Albemarle County are not
consistent with allowing these uses as they were previously proposed, the current
Application Plan allows for home occupations and daycare facilities (wi 1-5
Page 4 of 22
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
children) as By-Right uses. While the Crozet Master Plan suggests comer stores
as a By-Right use in this location, the Application Plan does not allow for this
(other than that which would be allowed under the home occupation regulations).
Mixture of Housing Types and Affordability: The Crozet Master Plan suggests
Cottages, Houses, Live/Work units, Accessory units, and Inns as proposed types
of housing in the CT3 areas. The Application Plan provides Cottages, Houses,
and Townhomes (which could function as Live/Work units using home
occupation guidelines). As discussed at a worksession with the Albemarle
County Planning Commission in September of 2005, detached cottages are
proposed in lieu of Accessory units to provide a unique opportunity for
affordability in a detached "for sale" residence.
The applicant has met with County Staff on several occasions to discuss the
design of affordable housing in Haden Place. The village homes on Haden Lane
and Killdeer Lane will likely be the most expensive product in Haden Place and
the Cottages will be the least expensive. Six for-sale affordable dwelling units
shall be made available within Haden Place as provided in Proffer 4.
Redevelopment: This existing R-2 property is uniquely located near the center of
the Crozet Growth Area in an existing neighborhood with frontage on two
existing streets. The site is located within ~ mile of approximately 6 other
development plans that are currently being built or reviewed. The Application
Plan provides a piece of the connectivity that would assist pedestrian, bicycle, and
vehicular flow between Haden Lane, Killdeer Lane, Ballard Fields, Jarman Hill,
and downtown Crozet.
Site planning that respects terrain: The lowest point on the site is proposed to
serve as an on site stormwater management facility with outfall into an adjacent
offsite stormwater drainage system. Blocks B, D, E, G and are proposed as
residential blocks having buildings with basement garages. This allows the fronts
of all buildings to have finish floor elevations above street level. Existing critical
slopes and wooded areas in the southwest comer of the property are proposed to
be disturbed to allow needed road improvements to Killdeer Lane. 500 square
feet of critical slopes in the northeast comer of the site are proposed to be
disturbed to allow needed road improvements to Haden Lane. 400 square feet of
critical slopes in the northeast comer are proposed to be disturbed to allow one
house site on Haden Lane. 3,000 square feet of critical slopes are proposed to be
undisturbed.
Clear Boundaries with the rural areas: All adjoining properties are zoned R-6
and R-2. The nearest boundary with the rural areas, as described in the Albemarle
County Comprehensive Plan, is approximately 0.75 miles.
Page 5 of 22
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Infrastructure:
Transportation:
The proposed plan would provide an East / West connection between
Haden Lane and Killdeer Lane. Haden Lane and Killdeer Lane
provide connections between Jarman's Gap Road and Old Trail Drive,
and Old Trail Drive and Jarman's Gap Road provide connections
between Crozet Avenue and U.S. 250. Mr. Gibson proposes to
provide full frontage improvements along his property frontage on
both Killdeer Land and Haden Lane and any improvements on
Killdeer Lane and Haden Lane as required by the Department of
Transportation to accommodate additional traffic generated by the
Haden Place rezoning application. Mr. Gibson has further agreed that
no vehicular connections shall be made between Haden Lane and
Killdeer Lane until such time that sight distance improvements are
made at the intersection of Jarman's Gap Road and Killdeer Lane.
Design Traffic Volumes for Haden Place are as follows:
14 SFD Village Homes @ 10 trips/ day
6 SFD Cottage Homes @ 8 trips/ day
14 SF A Townhomes @ 6 trips / day
Total ADT
= 140 trips
= 48 trips
= 84 trips
= 272 trips
The design traffic volume for the existing 16 lots on Haden Lane is
160 trips per day and the design traffic volume for the existing 8 lots
on Killdeer lane is 80 trips per day.
Stormwater Management:
The property lies within the Lickinghole Creek Regional Facility's
drainage basin, which manages peak flow from the 10-year frequency
storm. In addition to providing a prorated fee to this facility, a conceptual
on site facility has been incorporated in the application plan. The proposed
onsite facility outfalls into an existing stormwater pipe system, and some
additional on site detention is anticipated in order to comply with the
Albemarle County Water Protection Ordinance.
Two off site easements have been recorded to provide additional drainage
east to Powell's Creek. Approximately Y2 acre of the site will drain
Page 6 of22
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
Water and Sewer:
Page 7 of 22
through this easement. A small water quality facility is proposed in
conjunction with this system.
Conceptual Water Quality Management computations show a required
removal efficiency rate of 84% for an impervious area of 106,000 Square
Feet. The Application Plan proposes an area of9-10,000 square feet to
filter runoff from the site.
Public water and sewer are available in the Crozet Growth area. A 12"
waterline is available onsite at Haden Place. An Existing fire hydrant is
located onsite on Haden Lane. An existing fire hydrant is located on
Killdeer Lane across from the site. It is anticipated with the Application
Plan that a new waterline will follow the connector road, teeing into both
existing lines and a hydrant will be located near the entrance of Haden
Place.
An 8" sanitary sewer line is located on Haden Lane and is available to
serve future hookups at Haden Place. An additional 8" sanitary line is
available on Killdeer lane. It is anticipated with the Application Plan that
a new sanitary sewer line, serving all proposed residences, will follow the
proposed alley and connect to the existing line on Haden Lane.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
! I
I
Part 2: The Code of Development
The narrative herein, including referenced tables and figures from the "HADEN PLACE
ZMA 2005-0007 Application Plan" with current revision date of October 2, 2006,
establish the Code of Development for the property and meet the requirements of Section
20A of the Zoning Ordinance. Proffers are provided as a separate document. The
Application Plan is a graphic depiction of the zoning district and the following
descriptions are to be provided as shown on this Plan. Where any discrepancy occurs
between this written Code and The Application Plan, this written Code shall take
precedence. In the event a conflict ever exists between this written Code and the
requirements of any applicable state or local ordinances, the state or local ordinances
shall take precedence.
Illustrative Plan:
The Illustrative Plan is a representation of the general form and massing of Haden Place.
Development of Haden Place shall be in general accord with the Illustrative Plan.
Significant features of the Illustrative Plan include:
1. Lower density detached residential development along the perimeter of
the district adjacent to existing residences,
2. Higher density attached residential development (with home
occupational uses) internal to the district,
3. Functional open space (with integrated tree preservation and
stormwater management) located between the development and
Summerford Lane to the south,
4. Rear-accessed parking (via private alleys) for all residential units.
5. And a mixture of at least 3 (three) types of residential units in the
district.
Page 8 of 22
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
General Development Plan:
The General Development Plan includes sheets AS.! through A7 of the Application Plan.
The Development of Haden Place as a district shall be in general accord with the graphic
representations ofthe General Development Plan. The requirements of Section 20A.5.a
through Section 20A.5.f and Section 20A.5.i are provided on Sheets A5.2 and Sheet
A5.3, including the following
1. Permitted Uses By-Right,
2. Maximum allowable density,
3. Maximum allowable lot coverage (footprint of building / area oflot),
4. Maximum allowable height of structures,
5. Minimum allowable lot sizes,
6. Minimum allowable yard setbacks,
7. Location and requirements of Built-To Lines,
The Code of Development requirements shown on these sheets are not subject to the
"general accord" standard that applies to the physical layout of the improvements on the
Plan, pursuant to Section 8.5.5.3.
In addition, the General Development Plan proposes street sections for determining the
location and widths of the following: travel lanes, alleyways, parking lanes, parking bays,
landscape isle, medians, islands, rights-of-way, and access easements. It is anticipated
that final locations and dimensions of these elements of the street sections will be
determined with the approval of Road Plans, Utility Plans, and the Final Plat for the
development.
Where any commercial use is proposed, the commercial use shall be accessory to the
permitted residential use and shall be regulated by Section 5.2.2.1 of the Zoning
Ordinance. The intent of this provision is to allow limited, neighborhood-scale home
occupation ventures that would not alter the human scale of the residential district.
On street parallel parking shall be provided for each block in Haden Place, as permitted
by VDOT and the County Engineer.
The intent of the open space delineated in Block J of the General Development Plan is to
provide a substantial tree preservation of the existed wooded area on the site, onsite
stormwater management for the development of Haden Place, and a pocket park that
integrates the development of Haden Place with the Ballard Fields townhomes across
Summerford Lane. The open space shall be designed to maximize pedestrian
accessibility and use through plantings and hardscaping. As future interconnectivity with
adjoining parcels is still being considered by County Planners; at the request of
Albemarle County, the open space area shown as Block J shall be dedicated for public
purpose and made available for vehicular and/or pedestrian connections to the adjoining
Ballard Fields Subdivision and/or for realignment of Killdeer Lane.
Page 9 of22
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Land Use:
Residential Density (Section 20A.7)
Haden Place lies within Neighborhood 6 as identified on the Crozet Master Plan. The
site, along with the existing neighborhoods on Haden Lane and Killdeer Lane are further
identified as Neighborhood Village / Edge (CT3) from the Crozet Land Use and Place
Types Table. Residential uses recommended in the CT3 category include: Cottages,
Houses, Accessory Units and Live Work Units. The "Master Matrix" Crozet Place Types
and Design Guidelines recommended density is 3.5-4.5 units per acre with up to 6.5 units
per acre if accessory apartments are added for 50% of the residential stock.
As an R-2 district (existing zoning), 13 residential units are allowed on the site (20
utilizing bonus factors). The Crozet Master Plan recommends up to 24.1 residential units
(using 5.35 net acres) ifno accessory apartments are provided; and by incorporating
"accessory apartments", up to 34.8 residential units are recommended.
The Application Plan shows a total of 34 "for sale" residential units for Haden Place.
In requesting that 34 residential units (or 5.0 units per acre) be allowed in Haden Place,
the applicant shall provide three housing types, as follows:
14 SFD Village Homes (see supporting photographs in Part 3 of Code):
The larger residential units (typically 2,000 square feet and more) are placed along Haden
Lane and Killdeer Lane to provide consistency with the existing residential development
along these streets. The setbacks proposed in the Application Plan are actually greater
than the existing R-2 setbacks along these streets. While the side setbacks between these
homes are consistent with R-2 setbacks, there are no homes proposed adjacent to the
southern boundary and the homes adjacent to the northern boundary are shown with 20 ft
setbacks from the northern property line, which is twice that required in an R-2 district.
The single-family home footprints shown are variations of the Ashland, Bedford, and
Chatham models built in Wayland's Grant and Parkside Village. These vernacular-style
homes have deep front porches that wrap around on corner lots. The 8 homes on Haden
Lane have rear-loaded garages, which along with landscaping are oriented to screen the
rear of the interior townhomes and parking from the street. The six homes which front on
Killdeer lane have rear loaded, basement garages with additional room to park on aprons
behind the garages. The architectural style, colors, walkways and plantings of these
homes are consistent with Crozet's period of historic significance (c. 1870 to c. 1950).
6 SFD Cottages (see supporting photographs in Part 3 of Code):
The single-family cottages (typically less than 2,000 square feet) provide a new and
unique housing product for Albemarle County. The cottages and their lots are designed to
provide for-sale detached housing alternatives at a lower price-point in the growth area.
Page 10 of22
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The architectural style, materials, colors, and landscaping of the cottages will blend with
the Townhomes and Village homes of Haden Place.
14 SFA Townhomes:
The 14 townhomes are intended to direct mass, density, height, form, streetscape, and
activity to the center of the site without overwhelming the plan. Two ofthe buildings
allow for 5 attached units while the third building allows for 4 attached units. The effect
of this massing is to prohibit "row-housing" that is not in character with the surrounding
neighborhood of Haden Lane and Killdeer Lane and to provide a greater ability to match
the architectural style of the surrounding neighborhood. While the Application Plan
stipulates the residential character of the street elevation, it is the intent of the Application
to provide the ability for first floor neighborhood scale workspace to be incorporated into
the design as home occupations. Of unique importance to the design of Haden Place is
the 90-ft separation of the Build-To Lines and the parallel parking and substantial tree
canopy between the buildings. At the northern property line, the 10,600 square foot
"open space buffer", along with the rear alley and driveways, effectively creates a 50-ft
setback for the 4-unit townhomes at the top of Haden Place. Along with screening, this
creates a rear setback, which is 2 12 times that required in an R-2 district.
Open Space and Amenities: (Section 20A.9)
Three primary open spaces are provided, as shown on sheet Al of the Application Plan,
which integrate with the planned development and the surrounding community:
The l-~ acre passive pocket park, identified as Block J on the Application Plan, which
has an integrated storm water management area, a picnic pavilion, sized to serve the needs
of the Haden Place residents, and blends the planned development with the higher density
Ballard Fields townhomes to the South.. An approximately 20-ft strip of Ballard Fields
"Open Space" lies between this proposed park and Summerford Lane to the South. With
permission from the adjacent landowner, this additional land will be incorporated into the
pocket park design. The pocket park will contain a tree preservation area, an oversized
biofilter with plantings, footpaths, sitting areas and similar features that will help it
become a pedestrian link to and from Old Trail, Haden Place, and downtown Crozet. As
the exact location of future interparcel connections have not yet been determined,
provisions for future dedications for cOlmectivity at the request of the Albemarle County
Board of Supervisors have been made in the proffers and also noted on the Application
Plan.
On the Application Plan at the top of Haden Place is an approximately 110 ft. by 90 ft.
"square" that is framed by the cottages and four of the townhomes. In the center of the
square is a "green" of approximately 60 ft diameter. While the larger park serves a more
public use to the local community, the square will serve as common open space to the
residents on Haden Place. The area might serve as a garden, a play area, a sitting area, or
some combination of these.
Page 11 of22
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The 10,600 square foot "Open Space Buffer" at the North end of the site creates a privacy
screen between existing neighbors to the North and the rear of the 4-unit townhomes as
shown on the Application Plan. Along with screening, this area might also serve as a
place to walk a dog, play, or garden. Adjacent to the 4-unit townhomes, in Blocks L and
M are located a playground area and a garden lot to serve the needs of the Haden Place
residents. The final design features of the playground, garden area, green, and pavilion
area will be determined at the time of final site planning for Haden Place.
The pedestrian connectivity with Old Trail and downtown Crozet is further enhanced, as
there is another 1.5-acre park 800 feet south on Summerford Lane in Ballard Fields along
the way to Old Trail's Western Park, which is ~ mile south of Haden Place.
Historic Resources:
The existing c. 1882 vernacular-style farmhouse has been identified as historic (50 years
or older). Unfortunately, the house has been left vacant and has not been maintained for
many years. Original interior fixtures and detail have been removed and the overall
structure is in very poor condition. Renovation of the structure is not an option for the
applicant. While several of the existing trees around the homesite will need to be
removed to accommodate the proposed plan, the potential exists to preserve 3 or 4 of the
existing oak trees. The ability to preserve these trees is dependent on final road and
utility plans for Haden Lane. In addition, street trees, sidewalks, walkways, and front
yard landscaping are proposed throughout the site. Documentation of the historic
resources, in accordance with the Department of Historic Resources Reconnaissance
level survey standards will be provided as an addendum to this Code of Development, as
proffered.
Architectural and Landscape Standards:
The following Architectural and Lanscape guidelines will be applied to the buildings and
lots of Haden Place:
General Architectural Style:
The architectural style of Haden Place shall match the predominant style of the
Crozet residences from the late 19th and early 20th century. This "vernacular" Virginia
style is most evident in the shape and ornamentation of the late 19th century Victorian
homes and the eave and porch details of the early 20th century craftsman style homes.
Page 12 of22
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
Form, Massing and Proportion:
1. All residences in Blocks A and B shall have a formal porch facing the
adjoining street.
2. Haden Lane, Killdeer Lane, and Haden Place shall have a minimum of three
different house elevations built on each street front. This requirement is to
prevent the overuse of one architectural element on each of these streets.
3. To the greatest extent possible, garage doors shall not be visible from public
or private streets.
4. All first floors shall have 9' ceiling heights.
Materials and Color:
1. Vinyl siding is not permitted in Haden Place. Masonry, wood, and
composites of wood and masonry are permitted as an exterior fayade
treatment.
2. Roof materials may be architectural dimensional shingles, tile, or metal.
3. All materials and exterior colors shall be submitted and approved by the
Haden Place Architectural Review Committee. A variety of earthtone colors
is recommended for the neighborhood. White is not recommended. All
homes shall have a minimum of one siding color and one trim color.
4. Exposed foundations must be finished with stone, brick or stucco.
5. All exterior wood finishes (other than pressure treated porch floors) shall be
painted. This includes porch columns, railings, skirt boards and lattice
treatments.
Roof Pitch and Form:
1. Minimum roof pitch for main roof areas shall be 6: 12 for gable end structures.
Lower pitches may be permitted for hip roofs if the design warrants it.
2. Dormer roofs should match pitch of the principle roof. Shed roof dormers
may use pitches one half ofthe main roof.
3. With the exception of corner lots, ridgelines shall be parallel or perpendicular
to the street.
4. Eaves shall project a minimum of 8" for main roofs and 6" for dormers.
Architectural Ornamentation:
1. On houses with siding; window and door trim, as well as painted exterior
corner boards shall have minimum dimensions of 5/4" thickness by 4" width.
2. Shutters, where used, shall be half the width ofthe window size. No shutters
shall be allowed on twin windows without specific approval of the
Architectural Review Committee.
Page 13 of22
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Streetscape Treatments:
1. Front porches for Blocks C, D, and E shall have a minimum depth of 6-feet.
2. Front porches for Blocks F and G shall have a minimum depth of 4-feet.
3. Front porches for Blocks A and B shall have a minimum depth of 8-feet.
4. Sidewalks, as a minimum will be concrete; however brick may be substituted.
5. Driveways, alleyways, and aprons may be asphalt, concrete, brick, masonry
pavers, or stone. Gravel shall not be used except during the initial
construction.
6. All streets and parking areas shall be paved with asphalt.
7. All adjoining landowners shall maintain shared driveways and alleyways
equally. It shall be the responsibility of the owners to maintain the surfaces in
good condition and not use the driveways or alleyways in a manner that
inhibits intended use by other owners.
8. Owners shall keep driveways and alleyways clear of personal property, which
may render the travel way unusable.
9. All guests visiting in Haden Place shall be encouraged to park on the street.
10. All trash receptacles shall be kept behind the buildings and shall not be visible
from the street. All trash receptacles stored outside of a house shall be
enclosed in a fenced area, out of view of the street.
Lighting:
1. Any lighting along streets that is not regulated by the individual homeowner
shall be mounted on a 10-ft pole. The Homeowners Association shall be
responsible for maintenance, operation and costs associated with these
fixtures.
Landscaping:
1. Unless prohibited by the Department of Transportation, street trees shall be
planted in the planting strip between the sidewalk and road. Such trees shall
be a minimum of 2 Y2 inches caliper and should be of a species common to the
area, as stipulated in the "Albemarle County Architectural Review Board
Design Guidelines".
2. Entrances to the private alleyways shall be screened with ornamental and/or
screening trees and shrubs to limit sight access to the rear of Blocks A, B, C,
andD.
3. Evergreen screening and/or shrubs shall be planted along the rear of Block H
adjacent to the northern Boundary of Haden Place.
4. The intent of the landscaping along Haden Place is to create a "closed
canopy" between the architectural facades of blocks C and D.
Page 14 of22
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
I
5. Wherever possible, shrubs and screening shall be used to visually buffer any
visible parking areas, alleyways, and driveways from street view. Said shrubs
should be a minimum 24-inches in height at planting.
6. Supplemental plantings are encouraged particularly within the front yards
along streets in order to soften the appearance of all building facades.
Combinations of the various types of plant material (evergreen and deciduous
trees and shrubs) as well as native plantings indigenous to this area are
encouraged.
7. All Plantings in the Haden Place development shall be selected from the
Albemarle County Approved Plant List, a copy of which is attached with the
Code of Development.
Tree Conservation:
A Landscape Conservation Plan and Conservation Plan Checklist, showing measures
required to protect the area delineated for tree conservation in Block J shall accompany
any final development plans for the site. The Landscape Conservation Plan shall be in
accordance with Section 32.7.9.4.b and shall reference the Virginia Erosion and Sediment
Control Handbook Standard and Specification 3.38 Tree Preservation and Protection.
Any disturbance of the tree conservation area shall be mitigated to the satisfaction of the
Albemarle County Director of Planning and Community Development.
Architectural Review Committee:
The Haden Place Architectural Review Committee shall approve detailed
architectural standards based on the Code of Development prior to building permit
application to Albemarle County. Prior to the recordation of the covenants and
restrictions for Haden Place, they shall be submitted to the Director of Planning for
review to ensure compliance with the Code of Development. The developer shall
establish the Haden Place Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of the
first building permit in order to enforce the Code of Development's architectural and
landscape standards set forth herein. A certificate of approval from the Haden Place
Architectural Review Committee must be submitted at the time of building permit
application.
Page 15 of22
I
I
I
I Part 3: Supporting Photographs
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I Page 16 of22
't~\.
~~r~'~~:~~r
i
I
I :,.
I -...
,
T
I
'-
I
I
I
(/)
I c
0
-+-'
"0
I c
0
()
I 0)
-+-'
~
I 0
0)
c
I co
.....J
s-
O)
I 0)
"0
-
.-
I ~
I
I
I
I
I 1t o,\: 1."2..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Q)
0')
co
.......
c
o
L..
LL
0')
c
.......
en
><
LU
en
c
o
.......
-0
C
o
o
0')
c
:.;:;
en
><
W
.......
C
co
U
co
>
0')
C
.......
en
><
W
,-~i
Q)
E
o
J:
,rf/ffll./i
13 e>r 11...
I
I
I
I
I
I en
Q)
I -
c..
I E
co
I ><
W
I Q)
I E
I 0
I
I Q)
I en
co
-
I -
--
>
I
I
I
I 1.-b 0 t 1.;2..
II
-
~ _.
~-,
r.'''..;;. 'A;""~ =_:
It ,.;~"'=-= '.
I ~:~I i~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I '1.1 of 1..1-
en
(])
-
Q.
E
co
><
W
(])
Ol
co
.........
.........
o
(j
",
I~""""'"
: i::. ~. > _:.:;'0:--''';
< . ,d/#''''
1fJf/R. .{!t~-., ~'-
I
I
I
Q)
-
c..
E
ro
><
UJ
c
Q)
Q)
5-
c.9
~
~
--
C
::l
E
E
o
'-'
..~
,.'
-"'''',
. ~~'.,.~~+<,-~-o
!'
t '1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
/;1/ 0+ ~'Z...
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Appendix A:
Virginia State Erosion and Sediment Control
Handbook STD & SPEC 3.38
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1992
3.38
sro & SPEC 3.38
I. 0 ,I
TREE PRESERVATION
& PROTECTION
@
Definition
Protection of desirable trees from mechanical and other injury during land disturbing and
construction activity.
Purpose
To ensure the survival of desirable trees where they will be effective for erosion and
sediment control, watershed protection, landscape beautification, dust and pollution control,
noise reduction, shade and other environmental benefits while the land is being converted
from forest to urban-type uses.
Conditions Where Practice Applies
Tree-inhabited areas subject to land disturbing activities.
~~'."..""'"
III - 393
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1992
3.38
Planning Considerations
New development often takes place on tracts of forested land. In fact, building sites are
often selected because of the presence of mature trees. However, unless sufficient care is
taken and planning done in the interval between buying the property and completing
construction, much of this resource is likely to be destroyed. The property owner is
ultimately responsible for protecting as many trees as possible, with their understory and
ground cover. This responsibility is usually exercised by agents-the planners, designers and
contractors. It takes 20 to 30 years for newly planted trees to provide the benefits for which
we value trees so highly. Trees perform the following functions on a site:
1. Assist in stabilizing the soil and preventing erosion.
2. Help to decrease stormwater runoff through canopy interception and root
zone absorption.
3. Moderate temperature changes and provide shade.
4. Moderate the effects of sun and wind.
5. Provide buffers and screens against noise.
6. Filter pollutants from the air.
7. Help to remove carbon dioxide from the air and release oxygen.
8. Provide a haven for animals and birds, which help to control insect
populations.
9. Conserve and increase property values.
10. Provide psychological and aesthetic counterpoints to the man-made urban
setting.
Stresses of Construction
Trees may appear to be inanimate objects, but they are living organisms that are constantly
involved in the process of respiration, food processing, and growth. Construction activities
expose trees to a variety of stresses resulting in injury ranging from superficial wounds to
death. An understanding of these stresses is helpful in planning for tree protection.
1. Surface Impacts: Natural and man-related forces exerted on the tree above the
ground can cause significant damage to trees.
a. Wind damage - Removal of some trees from groups will expose those
remaining to greater wind velocities. Trees tend to develop anchorage where
III - 394
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
2.
1992
3.38
it is most needed. Isolated trees develop anchorage rather equally all around,
with stronger root development on the side of the prevailing winds. The more
a tree is protected from the wind, the less secure is its anchorage. The result
of improper thinning is often wind-thrown trees. Selective removal in favor
of a single tall tree may also create a lightning hazard.
b. Excessive pruning - Unprotected trees are often "topped" or carelessly pruned
to prevent interference with utility wires or buildings. If too many branches
are cut, the tree may not be able to sustain itself. If the pruning is done
without considering the growth habit, the tree may lose all visual appeal. If
the branches are not pruned correctly, decay may set in.
c. Trunk damage - Tree trunks are often nicked or scarred by trucks and
construction equipment. Such superficial wounds provide access to insects
and disease.
Root Zone Impacts: Disturbing and delicate relationship between soil, roots, and the
rest of the tree can damage or kill a tree. The roots of an existing tree are
established in an area where essential materials (water, oxygen, and nutrients) are
present. The mass of the root system is the correct size to balance the intake of
water from the soil with the transpiration of water from the leaves.
a. Raising the grade as little as 6 inches can retard the normal exchange of air
and gases. Roots may suffocate due to lack of oxygen, or be damaged by
toxic gases and chemicals released by soil bacteria.
b. Raising the grade may also elevate the water table. This can cause drowning
of the deeper roots.
c. Lowering the grade is not usually as damaging as raising it. However, even
shallow cuts of 6 to 8 inches will remove most of the topsoil, removing some
feeder roots and exposing the rest to drying and freezing.
d. Deep cuts may sever a large portion of the root system, depriving the tree of
water and increasing the chance of wind-throw.
e. Lowering the grade may lower the water table, inducing drought. This is a
problem in large roadway cuts or underdrain installations.
f. Trenching or excavating through a tree's root zone can eliminate as much as
40 percent of the root system. Trees suffering such damage usually die within
2 to 5 years.
g. Compaction of the soil within the drip line (even a few feet beyond the drip
line) of a tree by equipment operation, materials storage, or paving can block
off air and water from roots.
III - 395
,
If
II
f
;
If
I;
,
II
I;
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
I
,
I
I
,
I
i
1992
3.38
h.
Construction chemicals or refuse disposed of in the soil can change soil
chemistry or be toxic to trees. Most damage to trees from construction
activities is due to the invisible root zone stresses.
Design Criteria
No formal design is required. However, in planning for the development of a wooded site
where some trees will be preserved, a number of criteria must be considered.
Selecting Trees to be Retained
The proper development of a wooded site requires completion of a plan for tree
preservation before clearing and construction begins. Trees should be identified by species,
and located on a topographical map, either as stands or as individuals, depending on the
density and value of the trees. Base decisions on which trees to save on the following
considerations:
1. .Life expectancy and present age: Preference should be given to trees with a
long life span, such as white oak, beech, and maple. Long-lived specimens.
that are past their prime may succumb to the stresses of construction, so
smaller, younger trees of desirable species are preferred; they are more
resilient and will last longer. However, if the cost of preservation is greater
than the cost of replacement with a specimen of the same age and size,
replacement may be preferred.
2. Health and disease susceptibility: Check for scarring caused by fire or
lightning, insect or disease damage, and rotted or broken trunks or limbs.
Pest- and pollution-resistant trees are preferred.
3. Structure: Check for structural defects that indicate weakness or reduce the
aesthetic value of a tree: trees growing from old stumps, large trees with
overhanging limbs that endanger property, trees with brittle wood (such as
silver maple), misshapen trunks or crowns, and small crowns at the top of tall
trunks. Open grown trees often have better form than those grown in the
woods. Trees with strong tap or fibrous root systems are preferred to trees
with weak rooting habits.
4. Cleanliness: Some trees such as elm and black locust are notoriously "dirty",
dropping twigs, bark, fruit, or plant exudates. A clean tree is worth more than
a dirty one. Trees which seed prolifically or sucker profusely are generally
less desirable in urban areas. Thornless varieties are preferred.
5. Aesthetic values: Handsome bark and leaves, neat growth habit, fine fall
color, and attractive flowers and fruit are desirable characteristics. Trees that
III - 396
r
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I:
I
!
I
f
I
.1
,
t
It
I
It
t
l
liit
t-__:.
:: . .::,
. )V\
, ~>"
1992
9.
10.
3.38
provide interest during several seasons of the year enhance the value of the
site.
6.
Comfort: Trees help relieve the heat of summer and buffer strong winds
throughout the year. Summer temperatures may be 10 degrees cooler under
hardwoods than under conifers. Deciduous trees drop their leaves in winter,
allowing the sun to warm buildings and soil. Evergreens are more effective
wind buffers.
7.
Wildlife: Preference should be given to trees that provide food, cover, and
nesting sites for birds and game.
8.
Adaptability to the proposed development:
a. Consider the mature height and spread of trees; they may interfere
with proposed structures and overhead utilities. Roots may interfere
with walls, walks, driveways, patios, and other paved surfaces; or water
lines, septic tanks, and underground drainage.
b. Trees must be appropriate to the proposed use of the development;
select trees which are pollution-tolerant for high-traffic and industrial
areas, screen and buffer trees for noise or objectionable views, salt-
tolerant species for areas exposed to deicing salts or ocean spray.
c. Consider location of landfills. Gases generated in them can travel long
distances underground, to injure distant trees. Choose species tolerant
of anaerobic soil conditions.
d. Determine the effect of proposed grading on the water table. Grading
should not take place within the drip line of any tree to be saved.
Survival needs of the tree: Chosen trees must have enough room to develop
naturally. They will be subject to injury from increased exposure to sunlight,
heat radiated from buildings and pavement, and wind. It is best to retain
groups of trees rather than individuals. As trees mature, they can be thinned
gradually.
Relationship to other trees: Individual species should be evaluated in relation
to other species on the site. A species with low value when growing among
hardwoods will increase in value if it is the only species present. Trees
standing alone generally have higher landscape value than those in a wooded
situation. However, tree groups are much more effective in preventing
erosion and excess stormwater runoff.
III - 397
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
1992
3.38
DRIP LINE
."..
- .
PROTECTI\IE DEVICE
MAXIMUM LIMITS OF
CLEARING AND GRADING
.........
PROPOSED GRADING
-.
....
CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS RELATIVE
TO THE LOCATION OF PROTECTED TREES
Source: Public Facilities Manual, Vol. III, Fairfax Co., Va., 1976
Plate 3.38-1
4. Pre-Construction Conference: During any preconstruction conference, tree
preservation and protection measures should be reviewed with the contractor as they
apply to that specific project.
5. Equipment Operation and Storage: Heavy equipment, vehicular traffic, or stockpiles
of any construction materials (including topsoil) shall not be permitted within the
drip line of any tree to be retained. Trees being removed shall not be felled, pushed
or pulled into trees being retained. Equipment operators shall not clean any part of
their equipment by slamming it against the trunks of trees to be retained.
6. Fires: Fires shall not be permitted within 100 feet from the drip line of any trees to
be retained. Fires shall be limited in size to prevent adverse effects on trees, and
kept under surveillance.
7. Storage and Disposal of Toxic Materials: No toxic materials shall be stored closer
than 100 feet to the drip line of any trees to be retained. Paint, acid, nails, gypsum
board, wire, chemicals, fuels, and lubricants shall not be disposed of in such a way
as to injure vegetation.
III - 399
Ii
t
Ii
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1992
FENCING AND ARMORING
SNOW FENCE
BOARD FENCE
CORRECT METHODS OF TREE FENCING
( I I ,1/ \ ..... ~ =-
\ 1\ \/1/1 I
-P!
CORRECT TRUNK ARMORING
..
TRIANGULAR BOARD FENCE
Source: Va. DSWC
3.38
Plate 3.38-2 -
III - 401
i
~
I
.,
I
I
J
I
x
I
I
,~
.
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
:;:
1
I
!
.I
I
I
.
I
-
I
1992
3.38
b.
In the case of an individual tree, when the above alternative is not practical
or desirable, the following method is recommended to ensure survival of the
tree (Plate 3.38-4).
1) Before making the fill, remove the green vegetation, sod, leaf litter,
and other organic matter from beneath the tree or trees to a distance
of 3 feet beyond the drip line and loosen the surface soil to a depth of
approximately 3 inches without damaging the roots.
2) Apply fertilizer in the root area of the tree to be retained. Fertilizer
formulations and application rates and methods shall conform to the
guidelines provided in Table 3.38-A.
3) The dry well shall be constructed so as to allow for tree trunk diameter
growth. A space of at least 1 foot between the tree trunk and the well
wall is adequate for large, old, slow-growing trees. Clearance for
younger trees shall be at least 2 feet.
4) The well shall be high enough to bring the top just above the level of
the proposed fill. The well wall shall taper slightly away from the tree
trunk at a rate of 1 inch per foot of wall height.
5) The well wall shall be constructed of large stones, brick, building tile,
concrete blocks, or cinder blocks with care being taken to ensure that
ample openings are left through the wall of the well to allow for free
movement of air and water. Mortar shall only be used near the top of
the well and only above the porous fill.
6) Drain lines composed of 4-inch, high-quality drain tiles shall begin at
the lowest point inside the well and extend outward from the tree
trunk in a wheel-and-spoke pattern with the trunk as the hub. These
radial drain lines shall slope away from the well at a rate of 1/8 inch
per foot. The circumferential line of tiles should be located beneath
the drip line of the tree. Vertical tiles or pipes shall be placed over
the intersections of the two tile systems if a fill of more than 2 feet is
contemplated. These vertical tiles shall be held in place with stone fill.
Tile joints shall be tight. A few radial tiles shall extend beyond each
intersection and shall slope sharply downward to ensure good drainage.
7) Tar paper or its approved equivalent shall be placed over the tile
and/or pipe joints to prevent clogging, and large stone shall be placed
around and over drain tiles and/or pipes for protection.
III - 403
I
f
i
I
,
I
1
I
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
!
I
I
I
I
~
I
1
I
i
1992
TREE
WELL DETAIL
.
VERTICAL DRAIN
.
Source: Adapted from Tree Maintenance, 5th ed., Pirone, 1978.
III - 404
FILL SOIL
STRAW OR
FILTER FABRIC
SMALL STONE
LARGE STONE
TAR PAPER
TILE DRAIN
Plate 3.38-4
3.38
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
~
~
2:
~
u
-<:
z
o
~
~
u
~
~
'JJ
Z
o
u
~
o
1fZ
ClO
~Z
l"'lO
~~
~U
=~
-<:~
~O
~
=:
~
z
o
~
~
-<:
N
~
==
~
=:
t:
~
~
~
1992
~
o
~
~
~
~
~
~
Z
o
-
~
<
U
-
~
t
<
;e
o
-
~
~
o
u
~
<
-
U
~
c:'-l
~
~
~
~
~
~
f:
I
o
......
z
o
-
~
~
~
....
o
1.0
I
00
I
o
......
~
'8
Q)
e
e~
o I
UI.O
..c
.0
"0
..c
u
c:::
.-
....
&.....
."
.~
<I'l u
.0"0
- ~
"1' e
N .0
~
e
....
o
Z
~
u
'C
Q)
e
<
fl-
u
~
Q)
*
..c
.0 ."
"0 Q)
"'0.
Q) 0.
..c ~
U.o
.S ~
I.OU
~~
.....
.... ."
~.,g
~~
~
'8
Q)
e
e
o
U
..c
.0
"0
..c
u
c:::
.-
....
&.....
<I'l
.~
CIl U
.0"0
- ~
1rl0
I ....
~ .0
Q) Q) ~
"0 OJ) e
~ s ..
....." -
~o ~
..... tn
~ g
I ::l
"O~
8 as
030
I
o
......
~
r
I,Q
I
o
......
....
o
1.0
I
00
I
o
......
ca
'8
Q)
e
e~
o I
UI.O
..c
.0
"0
..c
u
c:::
.-
....
&.....
tn
.~
CIl U
.0"0
...... ~
N 0
I ....
...... .0
=@
OJ)
c:::
.- tn
"0 Q)
.20.
g ~
.- .0
~ ~
..c ....
.ou
"0"0
~ ~
..c
U <I'l
c::: Q)
.- ..c
~~
.s ~
.... u
~ 'C
~ Q)
e e
C/)<
ca
.-
u
....
Q)
e
e
o
U
..c::
.0
"0
..c
u
.S
....
&.....
tn
<Ii 1:l
.0"0
- ~
M 0
I ....
N .0
Q) Q)
"000
~ ~
~..c
U
~
I
I,Q
r
o
......
<I'l
0.
::l
o
....
00
.S
~
.....
~
~
..c
.0
"0
tn
Q)
..c
u
.S
\0
~
..c
.....
....
Q)
~
o
In - 405
~
r
\0
I
o
-
~
.-
u
....
Q)
e
e
o
U
~
~
.0
.....
o
.:::
0-
tn
8
....
&.....
tn
tn ~
.0 U
- "0
~
~ 0
I ....
N .0
tn
c:::
Q)
e
.~
Q)
ei1>
c:::
.-
CIl
..c
.0
"0
tn
Q)
..c
u
c:::
.-
\0
~~
.... c::: ....
B Q) Q)
~ g. =@
.... c::: e
0._ C/)
] c:::
I ~
~ b:1
o ....
~ ~
z~
"'<T
I
\0
J
o
......
~
CIl
c:::
o
.....
.....
o
U
....
o
Q)
00
~~
~~
g
~
.0
ca
.-
u
....
Q)
e
e
o
U
.....
en
~
U
"0
~
2
.0
.....
o
.:::
-
a'S
tn tn
8~
- .-
....~
&E
<Ii ~
.0 0
- U
Irl .S
..c::
.0
"0
..c::
u
c:::
.-
....
&
en
:9
N
..c
.0
"0
tn
Q)
..c
u
c:::
.-
\0
~
..c
.....
~
.....
.....
o
~
....
o
~"O
0-
~~
..........
~~
"0
'u ~
<0
-
'0
tn
.9
c:::
.-
~
E
~
o
u..c
c::: u
": :;
Q) e
.-
.-:: r.f}
..... ~
~~
~:.=
ca!5:
~ ~
.0 "0
::s ~
.....
c:::
Q)
.-
u
!.:::
.....
::l
tn
en
.-
-
'0
tn
c:::
.-
c:::
Q)
00
e
.....
.-
c:::
~
Q)
..c
~
c:::
e
00
....
Q)
>
t.I.l
.....
~
I
"0
~
e
a:l
~
en
c:::
o
.....
"0
U
....
o
Q)
00
~~
~~
]
.....
o
.:::
0-
en ......
8 .~
...... 0
.....
.... c:::
&.-
.~
~~
~g
"0 0
"0 U
~.S
~ ~
< ~
~
tn
Q)
as
c:::
en
.-
c:::
Q)
00
e
.....
.-
c:::
ca
c:::
o
.-
.....
.-
"0
"0
~
~
Q)
..c::
~
"0
c:::
::l
2
00
Q)
>
o
.0
~
]
V)
~
--
.....
..c::
00
.-
Q)
..c::
.....
tn
~
....
.0
.....
~
....
Q)
.....
Q)
e
~
Q
..c
.0
"0
*
3.38
00
l'
0'\
.....
..-..
......
Q)
>
Q)
-
Q)~
c:::
2
~
~
~
Q)~
u
c:::
Q)
.....
c:::
'ca
~
~
....
E-<
e
o
~
c:::
Q)
~
;g
c:::
.9
.....
~
e
....
..2
c:::
......
Q)
u
....
::l
o
C/)
I
I
I
I
I
j
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
f
.
I
.
~
~
10.
1992
3.38
8) A layer of 2- to 6-inches of stone shall be placed over the entire area
under the tree from the well outward at least as far as the drip line.
For fills up to 2-feet deep, a layer of stone 8- to 12-inches thick should
be adequate. A thicker layer of this stone, not to exceed 30 inches,
will be needed for deeper fills.
9) A layer of 3/4-inch to I-inch stone covered by straw, fiber-glass mat or
a manufactured filter fabric shall be used to prevent soil from clogging
the space between stones. Cinders shall not be used as fill material.
10) Filling shall be completed with porous soil such as topsoil until the
desired grade is reached. This soil shall be suitable to sustain specified
vegetation.
11) To prevent clogging of the drain lines, crushed stone shall be placed
inside the dry well over the openings of the radial tiles. Vertical tiles
shall also be filled with crushed rock and may also be covered with a
screen.
12) To prevent anyone from falling into the dry well and leaves and debris
from accumulating there, the area between the trunk and the well wall
shall either be covered by an iron grate or filled with a 50-50 mixture
of crushed charcoal and sand. (This will also prevent rodent
infestation and mosquito breeding.)
c. Where water drainage through the soil is not a problem, coarse gravel in the
fill may be substituted for the tile. This material has sufficient porosity to
ensure air drainage. Instead of the vertical tiles or pipes in the system, stones,
crushed rock, and gravel may be added so that the upper level of these porous
materials slants toward the surface in the vicinity below the drip line (Plate
3.38-5).
d. Raising the grade on only one side of a tree or group of trees may be
accomplished by constructing only half of one of these systems.
Lowering the grade: Trees shall be protected from harmful grade cuts by the
construction of a tree wall (Plate 3.38-6).
a. Following excavation, all tree roots that are exposed and/or damaged shall be
trimmed cleanly, painted with tree paint, and covered with moist peat moss,
burlap, or other suitable material to keep them from drying out.
b.
The wall shall be constructed of large stones, brick, building tile, or concrete
block or cinder block in accordance with the detail in Plate 3.38-6.
III - 406
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1992
3.38
TREE WELL WITHOUT DRAIN TILES
DRIP LINE
fiLL SOIL
COARSE
GRAVEL
';;~~1't~~~f~/i:~~~~;t~j:1{:~~~v5:J:?~tIj)?~- -
Source: Va. DSWC
Plate 3.38-5
c. Backfill with peat moss or other organic material or with topsoil to retain
moisture and aid in root development.
d. Apply fertilizer and water thoroughly. Fertilizer formulations and application
rates and methods shall conform to the guidelines provided in Table 3.38-A.
e. Prune the tree crown, reducing the leaf surface in proportion to the amount
of root loss.
f. Provide drainage through the wall so water will not accumulate behind the
wall.
g. Lowering the grade on only one side of a tree or group of trees may be
accomplished by constructing only half of this system.
III - 407
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
~
I
I
,
,
I
1992
11.
I
I
3.38
Trenching and Tunnelling:
a. Trenching shall be done as far away from the trunks of trees as possible,
preferably outside the branches or crown spreads of trees, to reduce the
amount of root area damaged, or killed by trenching activities.
b. Wherever possible, trenches should avoid large roots or root concentrations.
This can be, accomplished by curving the trench or by tunnelling under large
roots and areas of heavy root concentration.
c. Tunnelling is more expensive initially, but it usually causes less soil
disturbance and physiological impact on the root system (Plate 3.38-7). The
extra cost may offset the potential cost of tree removal and replacement
should the tree die.
TRENCHING VS.
TUNNELING
DESTRUCTION OF FEEDER ROOTS
WILL PROBABLY KILL THE TREE
TUNNELING UNDER THE TREE WILL
PRESERVE IMPORTANT FEEDER ROOTS
Source: Tree Maintenance, Pirone, 1979.
~
Plate 3.38-7
III - 409
!
I
I
1\
I
I
I
;
I
I
I
I
,
I
i
.
I
~
I
~
I
~
~
13.
1992
3.38
Tunnelling is almost always preferred over the trenching method. The tunnel
should be 18 inches or greater below the ground surface and should not be
located under the center of the tree (an off-center tunnel has the least impact
on the roots).
d. Roots shall not be left exposed to the air. They shall be covered with soil as
soon as possible or protected and kept moistened with wet burlap or peat
moss until the trench or tunnel can be filled.
e. The ends of damaged and cut roots shall be cut off smoothly and protected
by painting promptly with a tree-wound dressing.
f. Trenches and tunnels shall be filled as soon as possible. Air spaces in the soil
shall be avoided by careful filling and tamping.
g. Peat moss or other suitable material shall be added to the fill material as an
aid to inducing and developing new root growth.
h. The tree shall be mulched and fertilized to conserve moisture, stimulate new
root growth, and enhance general tree vigor.
1. If a large amount of the root system has been damaged and killed, the crown
leaf surface shall be proportionately reduced to balance the reduced root
system. This may be accomplished by pruning 20 to 30 percent of the crown
foliage. If roots are cut during the winter, pruning shall be accomplished
before the next growing season. If roots are cut during the growing season,
pruning shall be done immediately.
12.
Removal and Replacement of Damaged Trees: Should a tree intended and marked
to be retained be damaged seriously enough that survival and normal growth are not
possible, the tree shall be removed. If replacement is desirable and/or required, the
replacement tree shall be of the same or similar species, 2-inch to 2~-inch
(minimum) caliper balled and burlapped nursery stock. However, today, with the aid
of a "tree spade," the same caliper tree may be required as a replacement.
Clean-Up: Clean-up after a construction project can be a critical time for tree
damage. Trees protected throughout the development operation are often destroyed
by carelessness during the final clean-up and landscaping. Fences and barriers shall
be removed last, after everything else is cleaned-up and carried away.
14. Maintenance: In spite of precautions, some damage ~o protected trees may occur.
In such cases, the following maintenance guidelines should be followed:
a. Soil Aeration - If the soil has become compacted over the root zone of any
tree, the ground shall be aerated by punching holes with an iron bar. The bar
shall be driven I-foot deep and then moved back and forth until the soil is
III - 410
.
.
I
.
I
.
I
1992
I
j
I
~
I
I
3.38
loosened. This procedure shall be repeated every 18 inches until all of the
compacted soil beneath the crown of the tree has been loosened.
b.
Repair of Damage
1) Any damage to the crown, trunk, or root system of any tree retained
on the site shall be repaired immediately.
2) Whenever major root or bark damage occurs, remove some foliage to
reduce the demand for water and nutrients. .
3) Damaged roots shall immediately be cut off cleanly inside the exposed
or damaged area. Cut surfaces shall be painted with approved tree
paint, and moist peat moss, burlap, or top-soil shall be spread over the
exposed area.
4)
To treat bark damage, carefully cut away all loosened bark back into
the undamaged area, taper the cut at the top and bottom, and provide
drainage at the base of the wound (Plate 3.38-8).
5)
All tree limbs damaged during construction or removed for any other
reason shall be cut off above the collar at the preceding branch
junction (Plate 3.38-8).
6) Care for serious injuries shall be prescribed by a forester or a tree
specialist.
c.
Fertilization: Broadleaf trees that have been stressed or damaged shall
receive a heavy application of fertilizer to aid their recovery.
1) Trees shall be fertilized in the late fall (after October 1) or the early
spring (from the time frost is out of the ground until May 1). Fall
applications are preferred, as the nutrients will be made available over
a longer period of time.
2) Fertilizer shall be applied to the soil over the feeder roots (see Plate
3.38-9). In no case should it be applied closer than 3 feet to the trunk.
The root system of conifers extends some distance beyond the drip
line. Increase the area to be fertilized by one fourth the area of the
crown.
3) Fertilizer shall be applied using approved fertilization methods and
equipment.
III - 411
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1992
TREE WOUND
3.38
TREATING BARK WOUNDS
TRI~ AND TAPER
INCORRECT
l"rl H
,I \'i 1!lt '
;llliH!
CORRECT
PRUNING DAMAGED BRANCHES
CORRECT
Source: Public Facilities Manual, Vol. III, Fairfax Co., Va., 1976.
Plate 3.38-8
4) Formulations and application rates shall conform to the guidelines
given in Table 3.38-A.
Maintain a ground cover of organic mulch around trees that is adequate to
prevent erosion, protect roots, and hold water.
III - 412
I
1
I
I
I
1
I
j
I
~
I
~
1
I
I
I
1992
3.38
TREE FERTILIZATION
I
I
DRIP LINE '" I
'I ... ...
...._-5 -;;.--o~
J... -- - __ ~ -- -c::::> - - ___ __ c;:;>>-- __ ..
.,... /" <:>.- ....... c::::> -- ___ ci--
/'~------ = = ~. <:> - <=> ........:::' -
.ilL ,4~<::> =-: C>~_ J&c> = <::>? "T")
pC> <::>.......C> c>
.-.... \. ", c> ~ c> = <::> c> = & /C>/
" c> ....... <:> MIIIl.-. <::> ./ ./ ./
,__.C> <:> ~c> __-6
....... <:::> --Q... Q.. -- ./
- -......: -- <:::> - e::,- - ~ <:::> __ ----
...;:. - - ::::..- - - - ~ - -....\ ~D FE:'" C",CLE
SUGHTlY BEYOND THE
DRIP LINE OF THE TREE
DO NOT FEED AREA ADJACENT
TO TRUNK (APPROX. 1/3 OF
DIAt.lETER OF TOTAl ROOT
AREA) SINCE FEW FEEDER
ROOTS ARE IN THIS AREA.
...
/'
HOLES SHOULD BE APPROXIMATELY Hi DEEP
AND 2' APART, AND THEY SHOULD SLANT
TOWARD THE TRUNK.
Source: Tree Maintenance, Pirone, 1979.
Plate 3.38-9
III - 413
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
Appendix B:
Albemarle County Conservation Plan Checklist
I
I
I
I~
I:
I,
I~
I.....
l
Ii
1\
11
11
I]
County of Albemarle
Conservation Plan Checklist - To be placed on Landscape Plans
(Handbook, pp 111-284-111-297 for complete specifications)
1. The followin!! items shall be shown on the plan:
o Trees to be saved;
o Limits of clearing (outside dripline of trees to be saved);
o Location and type of protective fencing;
o Grade changes requiring tree wells or walls;
o Proposed trenching or tunneling beyond the limits of clearing.
2. Markin!!s:
o All trees to be saved shall be marked with print or ribbon at a height clearly visible to equipment operators.
o No grading shall begin until the tree marking has been inspected and approved by a County Inspector.
3. Pre-Construction Conference:
o Tree preservation and protection measures shall be reviewed with the contractor on site.
4. Eauipment Operation and Stora!!e:
o Heavy equipment, vehicular traffic and storage of construction materials including soil shall not be pennitted within the driplines of trees
to be saved.
5. Soil Erosion and Storm water Detention Devices:
o Such devices shall not adversely affect trees to be saved.
6. Fires:
o Fires are not pennitted within 100 feet of the dripline of trees to be saved.
7. Toxic Materials:
o Toxic materials shall not be stored within 100 feet of the dripline of trees to be saved.
8. Protective Fencin!!:
o Trees to be retained within 40 feet of a proposed building or grading activity shall be protected by fencing.
o Fencing shall be in place and shall be inspected and approved by a County Inspector prior to grading or construction.
9. Tree Wells:
o When the ground level must be raised within the dripline of a tree to be saved, a tree well shall be provided and a construction detail
submitted for approval.
10. Tree Walls:
o When the ground level must be lowered within the dripIine a tree to be saved, a tree wall shall be provided; and a construction detail
submitted for approval.
11. Trenchin!! and Tunnelin!!:
o When trenching is required within the limits of clearing, it shall be done as far away from the trunks of trees as possible. Tunneling
under a large tree shall be considered as an alternative when it is anticipated that necessary trenching will destroy feeder roots.
12. Cleanup:
o Protective fencing shall be the last items removed during the final cleanup.
13. Dama!!ed Trees:
o Damaged trees shall be treated immediately by pruning, fertilization or other methods recommended by a tree specialist.
NOTE: IT IS THE DEVELOPER'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONFER WITH THE CONTRACTOR ON TREE CONSERV AnON
REQUIREMENTS.
OWNER SIGNATURE
(DATE)
CONTRACT PURCHASER SIGNATURE
(DATE)
5/1/06 Page 1 of 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Appendix C:
Albemarle County Recommended Plants List
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
+'
III
I :::::i
III
+'
c:
l'lI
a::
I "
Q)
"
c:
Q)
E
I E
0
t.l
Q)
0:::
>.
I +'
c:
::J
0
()
Q)
I "i::
l'lI
E
Q)
..c
I ::{
I
I
I
I
I
I
M
~
<X;
N
:q
Qi
0
~
en
,~
?: ~
u
~ .c
U
Q)
...J ni
e C
(ij Q)
C ,!:
:J C
I:::: 0 2 0
Q) :2; U
00 e 'c Q)-
e Q) I1l
:J e
en e 1;::- -e .~
"0 " 'Ui :J "'"
Q) c Qj -- en~
a::: .2 > 'E l....- ~
a:: Q) I1l
I~ ~ 'ID E 1;):2;
0 0 "0 .!: :J I1l 00
(5 E - & I1l en E ~
:J .:.:.
e C Q) u Q)
Qj Q) 1;) Q) "0 .~ 0 :c
E .~ :J <5 0
C ..0 Q) 0 I1l 00 E
-;:- 0 E .c '(ij LL. a, E .c 00 I1l g
Cll E 13 0 u 0: 1"* I"P- ro Ig I~ 0 E ~ -~ "0
~ :J IQ. Q) u :;~ .c ~ ,!!1 0
:; 0.. .:.:. 1;) ~ I1l
- 0 1'9 e ~ .c 0.. 00 e 9- 0 ~ 0 .:.:.
CI) u Q) e ~ - 0 ~ I1l :J <( t (3 :J ~ I1l
e I1l l{lI u ~ .c u Q) a; 0 9 Q) 0
9- :2; io:: io:: e 00 ~ ~ e 0..
Cll ... Q) e "fig ii5 ~ E <( ~ ~ Qi Q) e .:.:. "'"
E ~ Q) I1l I1l .~ a; ~ ,9 I1l Q) I1l I1l e
Q. :2; "0 0 :2; Qj .r::: .c :J .r::: 3: ~ ..0 :2; "0 a; e 0 0 c::
III "lJ Q) @ Q) .- ~ u u "5 ~ $ Q) e Q) ~ Qj en '3
~ a::: Q) 00 ~ > "'" I1l Q) Q) .:.:. e Q) 0 e a;
Z I:: ~ Q) ,~ 5 Q) ~ .c ~ e Q) 0 ~ -11l I- 0 I1l 2 "0 ~ "'"
III Q) Q) N o ~ a:: Q) $ -Q) en I 0 Q) ~ 0:: e :.c "" Q) "" I1l
E -0> ~ I1l "'" I c:CD CD (3 U U5 E ..0 0 ~ I1l a::: I1l "'" 0
c:: Ci. 10 Io u ~ o e .c .~ .r::: e 00 ~ ..Q "0 0:: .:.:. $ l1l I1l
0 {: I1l l1l e I1l eiI: -~ I "'" e 00 00 '\... 0 e Q) Q) E e l1l 0 e 0 c:: :;
~ e :2; i;; E I1l I1l <( 00 '(ij .9 '0 Q) ..0 l1l 0
E :2; e o Q) Q) <( :.c 00 ~ ~ Q) Q) a::: 19 e 0 IE Qj Q) ""
III ~ 1;) .~ .g ~ e u e E u a; I1l e e
E "" ~ E E- .!l! "5 ~ ..0 ~ Q) Q) e E :J em :J I~ e .~ 0 ~ .r::: I~ 0 Q) ~ 1;)
.c: E E-g .~ "'" Q) :J "'" "0 0::: g
~ L) "0 :J .2 I1l u 00 Q) 0 00 Q) e 0 C :J Q) "0 u ~ u e I1l I1l "5 e e Q)
0 I1l "5 Qj E :; .r::: 0 ~ e I1l ~ o ~ '3 I1l E .c ~ :.c c:
Q) i' :J o 0 1- .r::: l1l ~ .r::: Q) ~ :J I1l 0 U 0 ~ ~ .r:::
>--~ ~ 10 a::: en <( uo 0.. en I 0..<( UJ $ ~ " I- l<:: :2; en I- u 0 10 <( ...J $ en en en en c:: u
""
~
.'
c
~ 'c -l1l
ffi <Ii ..0
e ..Q
I1l -e >
E I:~ u '0 '~
:J 1'0. <Ii cc6 e 00 :Jg
~ :J
'b I1l ,- 00 > Q) .!!1 <Ii "0 Q) c::
CD .c e U "0
Q) <Ii <Ii Q) Q) c6 en E > a::: '0 <Ii
~ -0> u; E E > > 00 Q) c: ~ U ..0 () c:
c: ui Q) :J :J U U 0 ~ I1l -~ 0 ~c6 I1l l1l e Q)
0 e e e -~ 0/1 00 0/1 ~ u ~ :J :J (/)0/1 e
>:t: c ,- (/) ~ 1;)
U Q) I1l I1l I1l > 00 :J 0::: 0::: ~
Cll :::l 1;) 1;) 1;) .!l! .!!1 U I1l I1l l1l I1l .u 'u ~ I1l 0 ;;;l1l
<Ii <Ii 0/1;-> c: e e e e o U ro 11l;;; I1l
E 9 > E I1l I1l .~ ni l1l 0/1 > I1l p: .r::: ,- I1l I1l I1l :9- ~ - 0 I1l ";:: U) 00
> .!!1 I1l I1l l1l >- ~ _ 0 e e,,-
U U i' E- U U C 'c U U U c: .- ~~ ~ Q) ro";:: "C UJ
III 'E Q) "C 0 c: l1l
U 0/1 ::l 'c .~ 0 1- .~ :E l1l 'C .~ .~ 00 11l"O .a l1l :2 B u- Ui..Q 00
Z 0/1 .~ Q) ,~ e 00 U '0 ro ,_ (/) :J
LU ~ I1l l1l "0 '0 Q) e I1l I1l U 00 :J I1l ~ l1l0 ~ :J .2Qi
E E E I1l E I1l I1l 'u .;; ro E E E ..0 ..0 I1l :J e ~ ~ e U 8 I1l ..0 U U U ..0_ e
ii Cl .c c: g[ o I1l I1l .0 0- .E I1l l1l.c 'C
:J :J .r::: Q) .r::: .r::: ,Q ro u > I1l l1l I1l ..Q ..Q ";:: "'0 ..0 0 l1l > o x niii U.!!!
:J U Q) 00 I1l - I1l E..o -0 9.
u LU 0, .c .c 00 00 l1l > 0 0 a "> ii ii E ,!!1 ?:
U ~ e "0 00 00 00 00 .~u E 00 00 00 00 00 0000 00 00 00 00
'2 11l"- :J :J 0 ~ 00 c: 00
Cl 'c 2 2 '3 '3 x :J :J :J :J ~ ~ 00 0 .~ {J I1l Q) 0 Q) :J :J :J :J :J :J :J :J :J :J :J
III a:: 00 x I1l ~ ~ 00 00 (/) e e e c: ~ c "0 "0 '2 00 I1l e c: U U U U U U U U U
.... Qj ~ Qj ~ ~ U U "S :.;::; 00 :J :J 'x 'x 'x 'x "'" "'" ~I~ Q) .- .3 0 I1l 00 I1l I1l iii Cii 01 Qi Qj Q) CD CD 4i
0 c:( 00 00 a; Qi .2 0> 0> I1l I1l I1l I1l e e ni~ LQ a; I~ rom
U U Q) Q) l1l I1l I1l l1l 'C I1l :J :J :J :J :J :J :J :J :J
co ..,J <( <( <( <(<( <( <( CD U U U 0 LL. LL. u: u: u: u: (3 (3 "" I:.J ...J :.J :2; :2; z 0::0:: 00 00 0 00 00
I I I I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
U)
::J
U)
-
c:
III
a::
't:l
Q)
't:l
c:
Q)
E
E
o
to)
Q)
~
>-
-
c:
:::l
o
CJ
Q)
i:
III
E
Q)
.c
<
Gl
E
III
Z
c:
o
E
E
o
u
Gl
E
III
Z
III
.~
c:
III
-
o
III
;-
Gl
e
c;;
...
:-e
'tj
t:
III
{:
III
.:::
CI)
~
c
"-
.'
c
!e
CI)
ill
I:
~
o
:::l
53
u
LlJ
Q
LlJ
(!)
Q:
oq;
.,J
1=
Ol
-'"
()
o
~ llii Ie:
U) ~ 0
ai ~ I~
m a>1(i) r:: .c
,!;;! .0 > Ol ~
Ui .Q ra ; -g S
CIl ,;;z:. [0 "C .-
L.L.. I - .!; ~ c
c ~31 ...JOlB CIl~
=C ......>Q) >0
,g :;;:;; lllwg o=:
c.::.::. > ro c: Qi ~'C ..x: Q)
,gjCll !2'c55~E:~c.. QjN
<t: 0 -'" '~I ~ .~ :.:i .!!! I =E N "c:
-'" 1:;"5l CIl Qj ~ ...J. 3 _ "Ol Ol
CIl CIl c::: 0 Ol ~ b ,~ 0 w E ~ ~
00 E "E $: i5. 51'g ~ lij w > Cl
.<:: .<:: Ol CIl c: U E c: c: .~. c: 1 !!!
m m.<:: E Ol Ol Ol ~ Ol Oll~
I';; I';; t "C"C"C Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol ..!!!
1<:1<: o~orn~C5C5 E~C5>
I.J.Jl.J.JzcnClco. . . <t:. . .
"c:
"m -
c ~QJ ~
:> m Ol
~~~ ~ >~
u 0 ~ ~ CI!!!
O/l EI'g a; <Ii 3l 0l1;U
<Ii._ E"5lc:~>=Ol-
() 'E :>c:::OlCl~::t:~?
~ t"Dui"fi= ~= CCOmm
::;:;~E()~~~~~~Cii""
-g-g.g~~:C.~2~'~~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ro E w~ Q) E t"D ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ :e ,~ E ~ E CIl C CIl CIl
() () () () CIl "C CIl 80m m > >
~ ~ ~ ~ x 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 0
~ ~ ~ ~ = >< ,!l! ,!l! ~ E E =: =:
aoooc?U~i=i=f=55~~
I I I I I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I -
U)
:J
I U)
-
c:
IV
ii:
"C
I Q)
"C
c:
Q)
E
I E I~
0 CIl
to) e
Q)
0::: -
CIl CI)
>. E ..
- nl ~
I c: Z 'ti
::l t:
0 c:: III
() 0 CIl
Q) E 't1
;: E III
I IV 0 oJ:::
E uCl)
="
Q) c
.c It)
<( .'
c
I ~
CI)
~
e:
I ~
0
::>
CIl S!
E u
I nl LU
z Q
iii ~
.~
c:: -
nl ~
I -
0
In :!E
I
I
I
I
1:::::0
n;
.c
~
~ .~ 3l
QJ- ~ t
E Q).:x; -3
..!)l~Q ~ .c
u.. ro 1ll:I: U
C:2:2_~rn ~3l
~ ~'~E2 g ~~
"'::l5[lE(/) t:: Cio
::x;. (/) (/) .c 0 -", Q) ~ ~ .c
- U:I:CQ).c>-'U
~-~:ii ~ C 0 ~ii:~ '" C(/)
i;j '9.['!? (; :ll ~ ro .c s: ,g ~ 1:
:2 :E ~:I: g ~ ~ ~ .:x; :J: gr ~
"CoC:"O,,- ..........uU).i::Cl)
~~~~~~~~ffic?J9-~
-E
.E
,'"
:5
'ii)
~
~
'g
~
_ ~ -U') c
,.~ ~ g E ~ 1:
'Ui C ~ '" g !!!
"t:l III (/)Q) 'c~ 'L: ~
em 0..0::
~~a. ~g E'=
U E )( III ~ = .!!! III '" rJ rJ
~ '" ~ ~ -:; 2 E C ~ 'c 'c
Ern-rna;!!!.2~ ,egg
.c:rau.o'~~- mrom
~ ~ g U) (/) a; .c: S ~ ~ .~ .;
::J ro ::J ~ ::J ~::9 en I.~ .t:: L.. "-
.....cnl:;:Jc "'C::JCroOO
~ ~ ~ U 'p, ,!!1 'ul, )( "",;::,.;::
!S ~ f5 [l rn"iii v I ~ ~ ~':5' g
<l:<l:<(<l:UUUU(/)(/)(/)(/)
, , I
It
8-
~
Q)
Z
IQ;
I'~
'"
"t:l
Q)
0::
Ui'
CIl
~
C
~
-
::s
..
~
t:
::s
..
~
'ti
t:
III
-
CIl
e
~
~
C
III Q)
N Q)
-g :; o;g
o ~ C C
U .... 0 III
Cii ca-.c .c:
I~ "t:l ~ ~U
~ C !!! <l:n;
~ ~ 0 ~9
~ ~ ~~~~
Q) C .- E Q) ~ _
~ ~E(; Q) ~ <(6~~s
Q) (/)o.c ~Q) Q) '" ~;> <(Ill~
..c ~.c:- ..= Q)__ C:"'::'-.c
E ~j~ ~Ill ~ ~Ern~~~~~
o ~1ll:I: C ~.cE 8 Q)~E.cIVEI~
c~ cnI~Eo E~~ ~u::JUIQ.c:::J
!~cE~~~o.c ~U.c '" 1ll!~'O!~cU5i
J~:ll~g~€j ~cE <(EQ)gEIU~i!g<l:~
ill u.c Q) '" ill :s III I ~ III 0 .c ~ !::. Q) ~ ,_ ._
-eEo..~_Ill:I:Q)llli!~ LuEQ)I~~ov~2
~ Q) '" 0 :::0 0 Q) :I: , ~ ,- .c 0 Q) 2 .2 ~ ~ .Q u:: ~ U C
g. Q ill :I: "8 U -.:: g -go 1: ~ en :I: U; .!!1 a.. if: ~ u.. _ .Q.8 g
:2i~:iiOQ)~~5~~!~:ii"80~~lg~~~~~<('!:2
..... .- u ~ c - c~..... U Q) (f)'C E C Q),~ c: C
c~E~~~~E2Q)~2~2:"t:lQ)Q) l~c'O-I~1ll
Q)~IllQ)O~-"'C"t:l"'-Q) Illc~Ill,~I~U.c~Q)
"t:l"t:l~E=O"'Ill--E~E"'.c-O.:x;~I~U"'Ill~
~~rr:<(~;::~5:~c3<l:?<(~~6u::Pc?J.!!l~:e~~
......
C
~
C;
~
ffi
e:
~
o
::>
S!
u
LU
Q
......
......
~
CI)
-v
U;
III
. ~ E
'" III Q)
~~5 ~ i ~
~ ~~:ii ~ ~; i
co 1m ~ ~ ~. :: "3 (5
",'~'" ~~i~~:cQ)2~~ E~ ~~~~~~~""
> III '=- > ..::. :;:.- III ~ 2 '" ~ U u > > = U >
U~~1ll 295:-:;"'n; Q)", ~Euulll~U>
E = Q) - III 0 = U'-:> (; E .!!! III ,~ ~ ~ 'lii ,!!1 ~ ~
"'~"'~~~~C"'~~?Ill.cIll"'~Q)~=Illt::"'1ll
c:: ~ .2 & .3 C:;) ":; Q) ii co Q) ~ r::: '- ~ _ x - -- 0_ l:: c: ra
ro_~oc~wm.-a-ron::Jror:::~._ c~~~m:
~"'-~Q)~Ill';::~ "'ro~EOc"'IllI~"'.cO~o
Q)!Q)Ill.:x;U_u>IllEu,: ~_Ill~I~~"'"t:l~~
~~~U~~~~0'~mul~2c:~~O~~0w~C:
Q)E"''''=,2,2,2,2-1ll1ll5"t:lQ) uE"'",)(I~n;n;
~ co ~ ~ 01~:~IYI~' ~.- D C ~ m 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0
D u.~.~ ~ Q) Q) Q) Q) ~ ~ 01~ Q) 0.0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 00 ~
~-I.pl'c~222~-U~1~1~=mc:c:c:c:c:c:~~
B~rnm~~~~~~~m0Ix~~222222}o
<(<l:UUUUUUU:.:::2:2000..0..0..0..0..0..0..0..0..(/)
I I I I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
Ul
:J
Ul
-
c:
III
n:
't:l
Q)
't:l
c:
Q)
E
E
o
to)
Q)
D::
~
c:
~
o
U
Q)
~
III
E
Q)
.c
<(
QI
E
nl
Z
r::
o
E
E
o
()
""
Q
"t
.'
Q
~
ffi
e:
QI..,J
~~
~~
.!:! ~
;~
'Oct
mO
'Iii
ro
U5
Q;
E
E
lID lll'~
:E.c ~
>".!!!
>0::0;
VI ..0
III CIl III
X e: VI
~z~
.2f -g .a' ---1=
:C.2 e E;:
~()L: C1J~
lll--I- Cl~~
E'!!! t CIl III
o 0 m ~ Ci)- .~
sl1J ~ 06 J:. ...J. ::l1l
-...... tOO)....
~VI -VIe: ~O~>CIl 10
e:~ OVl.2 E
~ro ~~m o~ ~
roo~ VlE~u 5111~ ~
-~ c...._o c~ ~
= VI lllQ. VI 0 '0 ,~ u..
Q. '.2 Q. e: 3: ~ CIl"'" 'ID C .
CIl~"~~ _CIlOI~ 1:...Jlll VI~ ~
~cE~~ ~~UIO' I~' c am 00
~~"ffiffi ~e-Ol~ [Q~~ 0::6 ~
c~2e:CIl ~CIl!I~CIl si~ CIle: 3: ~
~ [Q ~ ~:g III 6 :3 .~ :g _ :0 15 ~ ~!!!.2 ,2:
-e:~lll::: .o1~o;CIlO::CIlI~[QCIl lll~ = ,-
2~~~ ~~lg~I~€IllI=I~ I~~ ::: ~~
~~-<("~'J:~j~I~~u~~I~~0~Ill~uE-g!i5
~~ ~ VI~",~OVlQ;WIEe:o~IllQ;E'a~3:CIl
lllCll~CIlU<(_.orooCll> 1~1~e:OCll~CIlClllllCllCll
~m~~CIl~~iol!~=i~lllla~Q.~~CIl3:U5~
~3:.oQ;I~e:~I'~e:0::1210Xo~~lge:~~~lo~I~:::~CIlCll
ro a ~r~VI.... c c ~._._.... - C e:'0e: e: VI VI
D-C1JQ)~ C1J.....~ ....c>mC1J....c.c ._ocmC1J
~.oUI~mCll~CIlClllllCll=>~e:~IllCllEl"al~Ille:e:
~U~I~~~-_3:VlI~O&_~ ~3:"CIlI~CIlI~I~
m~m~~55~~g~m~5~~m~~Q)~ol~i~
Q.CJ)~<(:::?~WLL:"::O::UI-~...J~Q.LL<(:::[Q:..::ElEl
Ie
E
"
0::
e:
III 'Ill
VI U VI
ui> '5 0
>u ~ 0:: ~ ~o::
u c6 i"9- c- -('0 en . (.) ~ ~
c1Illl. VI . III ~>Vl06 E" III
tf).....~ Q) U) U 00> . "'C ;.=.
'~8u :E ~ '5~~~u~ ~~~ cv~
~:O06_::: 06~ '0::>;~1ll06~ U<(Q. Eu
"t:l e: VI ~ . > ~ . U III ~ ~ I'g, 06. rl 06
III Ill'> e: III VI.~ U U e:06 ~ ~ CIl e: e: III III III 0 III
~ 10, CIl oE I~ ~ ~ 06 06 1l Ill. :O15.!!! III .!!l ~ ~ III :ii 1:l iU
ux~ IE--mm -CracW~OL:tt.~m~-
E CIlla01:lulll"=Q;IllOO~---e:~CIl"
~.~.~.~121~i5ra'c~~e~~-~~'~~~~~I~~
CIl~~~I~IllI~e:oo-~~uxX~o""I~ I~CIl
~UoUml~~m~~xu~~ro~!UU0~~m.m~
'CCCC'~'~I~O~00rom~~~m m~€m
~~~~~~I~.~~~~.~.~OOO;~~~~mml~
Q;IDCIlCll"~lllue:e:e:CIlCll!~I~I~ee:e:e:x3:3:E
oEEE~~romooorn~mmmrn222~2~1~
<(<(<(<([Q[QuuuuUJ:J:~~~Q.Q.Q.Q.~~~~
, "
(iJ
>
o
t5
~
CIl
~
CIl
.x
VI
"
I-
:>?
III
o
U
(j)
>
-ci 0; N-
o > CIl
I~ ~ CIl' n
~ ~~ ~
.!!!ffi gli VI 0;
Igl'= III al 0 ~ ~ ~ CIl ~
"'" CIl ::: ~ CIl ~ -=.- ~ CIl,...
"'" 1"9 CIl ~ CIl CIl ~ 6' e: ~ ~ :.J
"IllQ19gii;Q;O::~ ,ge:-=-
E ~ III ~ .;:: I 9' n ~ C ::: 'iij .!!!
<(CIl~ LL.Ee:CIlWlll ~~
~Q) ~ ~ :m ~ u: ~ ~ .S :~ B g E
E :ii .~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E ~ ~
.!!!19 iU E :.c ~ (; E i ~ g 0 ~
!f-Ell-=>U:::U~O::LLU'-'U
iii
CIl
:::
x'
"
o
i:ii
1::--
Q
l'l
~.
Q
It:.
ffi
e:
..,J
~
~
::!E
~
It
o
..,J
..,J
~
CI)
~
VI >
ui :J U
VI (iiU 06
~ iii UJi3 :; CO'_m
w ~ ~._ ~ C co; ~ U
E VIe: lll~~'-~:O
III 06 "'~.;:: '= III e: CIl e:
~ E .- (j) ,~ ~ E E .~ iU .-
. "E ~ ~ > III tIS .~ 3: .~
.!!!iUae:~~VI ~~~xE
III E .;:: " ~ ~ III 0" = E CIl
e: lll.o_-Eu..c:lllCll 0
c":;;_....CI:: VI-'cE"~
'5 c. III .E III III VI e: = e: VI
- ~ :: ni 5 ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ cv :5 Ci>
CIl CIl CIl - .- .- ~ ~ .x III E.o ;;;,
ooom..c..coOC:~n:Jmm
<(<(<(UUUUUWLLJ:...J...J
I I I I I I
1
Ii
I
I
I
I
I
I -
1/1
:J
I 1/1
-
c:
ra
n::
I "C
Q)
"C
c:
Q)
E
I E
0
0
Q)
a:
I ~
c:
~
0
0
Q)
I ;:
ra
E
Q)
.0
;;:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'"
o
o
~
.,
~
...
-.:::-
III
~
:J
en
iii
'C
"0
~
0
c
en
C
0
m
CD
"0
Q)
a:::
ai
~
'n;
C:
vi
~
1'0
en
..><
I;;;: c
0::
~ :I:i
III Q)
0- rJl
~ ~ c
q:, ~
s:::= Q) ~
cO Qi .a
...., - Q) ~ III Q)
III -g ~ z
,.; ~ g
x en ~ ~
m (ij III III III
e;; .a Q)
~ e;; E .a 0-
" en III
() c E t:5 g
~ ~ ,~ ~ :J
CII .!'!! III :~ en -:g .ai III = E
Q) 0 0 1!2 c ,- Q) :J E
E co lii :: 1::.0
Ie: :~ III 0 Ql III :: E :J
nl ~ :c -0 0
c I~ III l-g u: 3: 0 :J C
Z c .!'!! III 0 .a c c Q) C .a ~
~ 0 :2 u: III :::: 'n; I :g C en en :>~
I: .~ 'i:i III t:5 .~ a::: :J :::>
0 ,!,!! Ql .a III en C Q)
E rJl III 'E C t:5 .- rJl III "0
'0 III .a Ql t:5 C III Q)
:2 a; C I~ III Q) III 'E C .c. -
E c "0 ..><0
Ig m Ql I~ III .a 0 'E Ql :J1:g 0.0
0 :: m III 0 III Q)
() :2 en III Ql t:5 ~ :J o III coCi)
en ...., ~ en N :.:: :2....,
1::--
C)
c-..
I
Q
't'-
'-
m ....
III
e: ~
"5
-J 0
'6
~ ui ui 'E 'c
> 0
~ > 0 .c. ~ 0 E
0 06 0 ~
CII 06 III ~ ~ :J
III rJl .- .-
E == C rJl :E :c
III III III III 'ii) III 0 ~ rJl
0 0
nl ~ o~ 'c "Oc 'C ~ III :J 'c
Z .~ C Q) 'E 0 - 0 .a
c;:::- III ._ :J Q)
a::: .- Ql ::>.c. ~ cri~ 'Cij > C C. 'ii)
iii ~1i) '> :@~ > rJl 'E 'C ~ ~
0 o C
.~ .!'!! .!'!! .!'!! o ::> m III ::> ::> E E
I: -J 00 0 == .c. rJl 06';' N .l!! 'E.!!1. ::> ::>
nl -J C C C rJl rJl rJl rJl rJl rJl rJl III )( C E
- ~ ::> ::> ::> :J ::> ::> ::> ~ ~ :; ::>
0 III III III 1lIe;; e;; e;;e;; e;; .? .a .a
~ :2:2 :2 :2:2 :2 :2:2 :2 0- U5U5 :> :>
- CI) I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I -
Ul
::J
I Ul
-
s:::
III
D:
"C
I G)
"C
s:::
G)
E
E
I 0
(.)
G)
0:::
>.
-
I s:::
::s
0
U
G)
't:
I III
E
G)
.Q
<(
I
I
I
I
I
I
I;
8
~
~
.....
~ Ia;-
.' IE .~
Q
~ ~ ,!g
CI) c: J:
ra 1%
a:: u: Qj
~ c: .!: .c 1:::-
0) c: 0 I~ c:
~ 00 0) ra
0) I- 'c C3
0 6 en nl o c:
(.) c: "0 000)
:c n; I.g, - 0)
."J III :n z III ~
::!: 0 -c: ~
>- E ' ra
~ ~ Ie; w :!2E ui
~.>< c:
.~ 0) .- 0) 0 !!!
::E ~ ra C .?: ~ ~ E :n .:;
III ~ ::>
~ u:: III 0 III 0) is ~ ~ 0) 0) 0) I~ I@. e
III 0) c: c: >- I~
0 0).>< 0) jQ I .!!! ::> 0) 0) 0)
ell a:: c: ~M I,~ ,g. c: a: c: a: 0) 0)
E (5 Iii 0 III III ra (5 0) a: a: III .s .s
0 0 c: III .?: .?: c: "O.c 0) ~ en c: .s .>< 0) .~ .~ 0)
III c: "0 ~ ra ~I@ 0) U I.?: 0) 0) 0 ~ ~ 0 0) 0) a: "0 :c 0) 0 c: .s
z ~ 0 0) ra .a I~ (5 is :> o ~ ::> 0) ::> ::> ::> .!: 0) 0) E ~ 0) ra III I~ 0 0 .~
U"O .!!! ra ra 0) "0 ra ra 0 ~s: ii'i III ~
U Q) c: I I is O)..J :i: 0 Ci. ,,?- ii'i 0:: c: .a .a
C III Q) ..J ctIi'~ 0 U5 :::J ll. c: s: .- a: 0) 0) ra ~ ~ 0
0 q: raU .... u. 0) U N c: 0) I O::c: c: en i5. en en 0 .>< 0 0) .- 0) Q) 0) I,~ >- -, .a
u:: c: E rl III ci c: ra ~ men III ll. III ll. I.?: III ~
E ~~ 0 "0 ~ ,Ill :n en n; c: "0 0) ~ 0) c: E.c Q) .c E c: n;
g m o 0 c: 0 2 ~I:g c: ra ra .a III c: 0) c: a: (5 c: U III :n c:
E 2 .~ -, ~ .c .s 0) 0 1:2
0)"0 ~I~ ra Q) .s 0 :; ~ :c 0 ~ .!!l ~ E ~ ~8 I~ "0 I~ in 0) c:
0 :c :::J 0 "0 I~ ::> E c: III Qj III ~ :c 0) :n is "0 :c n; IE ra
.~ s: - 0) 0) ~U 0) ra 0 ra ::> 0 0 s: 8 ra ~ ra ._ ra Q) 0 ra c: ra 8 C3
~ 000 U ..J ii'i <( en u. z ww en z en U ..Jen -, ..J-, 0:: wen ..J -, 00 w ::> w
ell
e
u
!!!. -l!!
CI) ~
~
LIJ ra
en
a:: ra
(!) c:
a:: ra ui :c e -Q) ui -ra
c: () rl
~ -ra .!!! c: ra III () iij ui
ra 0 =--- -en ::>
0 c: D/l ~ $-' -, ~ c: ra I~ ()
LIJ ::> 0 "*~ D/l '0 ui
ra III rl ..!!! c: ra
Q ~ rl ra ra ra E D/l ()
ell ~ 'c 1'1 Cf'J o Q) c: 0 Iii ra $-' ui
E ~ .!!! 'c u.- ra c: :::J .!!l D/l ()
ra I~ 0 ui I'~ _en 'c ~ :> ra ra .c ra n;
III ~ 1'1 :c ra III I'e; 0
~ 0 N () ra . III III c: ra 0 ra ra :.;::;:ru iij c: .!!l D/l
Z ~ o+:; ra._ .!!!. .~ c: iijO:: I'~ ra :ii ;: ra c: ra 0 III III 'C n;
:n 2~ in ra 0) 1Il- "0
-c: "0 c: 0 ra ~H~ ~~ o :::J .- ra Q) ra
ii 8.!!! o ra ra 0 D/l 1.9- ::> Q) .:; ~Io III 0 .a .- 1Il~ .a "00 I'g. "0 c: ~
."J .~ III c:= c: ~ ~.~ c:.a Q)"O
c:- O).a III ra Q)Qi 0) :::J 0) 0 c: c: E ~ .- 0 ~Q) c: E :;: III "ll 0)
.~ Q o ra "0 ;: 0 III :::J 0 I~ III o ra .- ra 'C E III ~ :::J :::J
0) E 0) III I~ ::::z ::> Q);: iilo 5,E ~~ ~~ 0)- 1Il.s ;; .2.a 0 0 ":5 1'5.
c ~ o III III III ra Ii IQ III ra ra = :n "0 0 o 0 ~ III 0
III :::J :::J ::> E 0) "0 III III
.fl 0) ~ -0-0 :::J 19 0 x x x 1.9 .!:SI~ ra ra ra ra ra III III III III III III III III III III o :::J ::> I'~ I'~ I'~
ra ~ ~ ~ l'3 ~ ~ ::> ::> ::> ::> ::> ::> ::> ::> :::J
0 a:: ._ "0 U X X X X c: ~ ra c: c: c: c: c: c: c: c: c: x x x ::> :::J ::>
.a 0) Q) Q) .c ::> ra .c .c .c
al ClJ ..!!! ..!!! ..!!!..!!! :::J ~:i: a: a:: a: a: a: a: a: a: a: a: a: a: a: a: a: ra ra
<(U UU U U >< U -, 1-1- l- I- l- I-
I I I I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I -
.!!!
..J
I .e!
c::
.!2
D..
I "C
Q)
"C
c::
Q)
E
I E
0
(.)
Q)
0::
>.
I -
c::
::::l
0
U
Q)
I -.:
IV
E
Q)
.c
<(
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
"2
Q)
Q)
(3
:2 ra
Q)
u (I)
::l
0 N
~ Qj
~ '- I
0
(I) (3 ci
r:: ? N
0 0 IE
aJ
"C ra Cl.
r:: Q)
i~ r::
:.c: ::l
0 () ffi
0 ~
I C ci ~
""" l(il ~ 1::1 u::
It) 'C
..... "C .!!! ra l;:: u
.' 1-= I~ r:: Cii i~ ii5 Cl. 'Q.
::l l(il t)
~ Q) 1"2 1.:;- (5 I u Q) E
..c: r:: I,~ ~
u ra Q) 0:: Iii 0 ::l
Q) Q) E ffi 0
::l Q) ffi > 1:2: <Ii Z E
.5 0 ~ Cii <;; ra 0 :.i ~
Cl E > rJJ ui ::l ..c: Q) () r::
t: Iii ::l rJJ "C ...J U r:: Q)
ra .~ (I) a::
Q) "C "E ..c: r:: ra Q) r:: t) Q)
e Iii ra Q) Q) l!! r:: <Ii it (3
~ Q) aJ () Q) I~ rJJ
U ~ (3 (3 (I) Q) ,~ u; -r:: 0
!!?. "C ::3 ~ "C (3 E ra Q) 0
w ui .g ~ Z rJJ .E :a
0 t f:l 0 ..c Q)
::l ~ r:: LO 13 ..c E
CI) ra ra 'n; S2. 0 ~ <Ii () ::l 0
t) ~ ~ ::l t) ,!:: ra ~ ra "C
~ Q) "C "E ra ~ ~ ~
Iii Iii rJJ aJ It :.::: aJ
~ ~ aJ ~ 0 ::l r:: ~ ~ '- ~ :; Q)
Q) 0 <;; 't: E .~ rJJ
~ ..c r:: ~ 0 <;; ..c: :; ~ Q) "tii ...: Q) ,!!! Q) Q. ::l U
Q) E Q) Iii Q) "C ~ ra ra Q) 0 ra 0 E ::l I~ @ 0 ~ r:: ~ ~ r:: ..c: ::J
0 X r:: ~ aJ S2. (5 r:: .~
E 0 1I1 € Q) 0 Q) Q) -, 0 ~ ..c: 0 Q) rJJ "E f:l
CI) ~ .0 aJ ~ 0 r:: r:: r:: Q) "9 e - () I Q; ::l Q) (5 ~ >
::J ra ~ ~ aJ Q) 0 r:: ii5 Q) -, Cii 0 Qj ra ..c: Q) ra ::J ra (I) ::l rJJ
l'll 0 ~ nl
lli l) aJ -r:: x Q) (5 (5 ~ nl >. ~ ~ ~ r:: ,9- :; ..c: u > ra x ~ Q) ..c: E 'r: iU ~'?- .~
z .!!! ..c: Q) (5 (5 -Q) ::J ~ "E
:::l Q) r:: x 0 rJJ ~ r:: 0 "E z:. (5 'E r:: (5 & nl I rJJ
Cii <t.: r:: 0 aJ () () ra 0 I I (5 ::l nl Q) 3: ra 0 :g 2: (I) .-
C Q) ..c Q) Q, ~ ~ 0 1il ra (5 (5 nl I rJJ ::l ffi ...J U ...J (5 - aJ 0 ra _Cl.
..c Iii Cl. aJ ro I I ...J -, ::l ra E
0 Q) Q) r:: Q) I I Q) Q) ra g> Q) I rJJ ..c: 0 rJJ r::
<( r:: "C nl r:: Q) Q) r:: r::
E It: rJJ P- aJ E ro ra W 0 Q) "E rJJ ..c Q) rJJ rJJ ~ r:: Q) -, Q) !S 'n; rJJ ~ Iii nl rJJ -Q) Cl. Z Q),-
~ OJ U Q) ~ 0 Iii rJJ "C '" ra Q) Q) r:: c= rJJ ...J Q) r:: Q; r:: 0 ,9- Z!S
(!) c: ~ ~ Q) .~ 't: 0 ..c ra r:: 0 '" r:: r:: ~ g, Iii :.c: "E <;; 'g. r:: ~ ..c: :c r:: 't:
E Q) ~ ~ Q) Q. E Q) .~ Q) Q) Q) ..c: ..c: ~ ::J '" r::
It: '" ri "E ra Iii g rJJ E! 't: .!:: ~ ~ ..c ra rJJ "E r:: u ::l nl 0 ~ iii "5 t r:: t ~ nl "C ::J
0 0 ~ E x 0 ::l 0 Q)
~ ra ~ 0 Q) 0 nl '" ::l ..c: nl .>t:. '" P Q) :.c: ~ 0 0 0 0 nl (5 Q) ~ '- 0
5 1I1 ~ 3: ~ u: ~ ra ra ~ 0 ra 0 Q) 0
~ -, ::i <( 0 aJ aJ 0:: <( aJ () () ...., ...., r:: >- ~ () ~ () -, ...J (I) Z Z I u. 0:: 0 i:li~
III
...!,
OJ
f!! or::
r::
~ Q) -Q) ~
Cl. -", ::l 'ijj
E ffi nl
It: l/l 1il ..c <Ii
~ 0 z, ~ rJJ >
U ~
(!) :.;::; "C l!! u
It: ~ ::J <Ii Q) ra ..c: ~ ""
<Ii :l= > E ...J <Ii u
~ <Ii ij u 0 r:: > ~ rJJ
<Ii '" ::J ra ::J
'in > ~ "" rJJ ~ ~ <Ii u ~ 'E '",
III > u "" r::
u r:: ":fi .2 E ij E "" E nl <Ii 'ijj 'E
'" "" '" '" :c :0 -nl ra E ~ Q)
Q "" '" Q) :E P '" 2 'in ij '" r:: Cl
Q) j r:: r:: E ::l .g '" "" ::l E u nl g
~ 0 ra 0 r:: <Ii <Ii <Ii 0 'in rJJ Q) ::J 0 ::J
E nl ~ ~ :Q rJJ 0 U 'r: ,2
'" Q) :; ~ E E 0 :g > .~ > > ui Q) r:: ~ ~ r:: ,2 "" Iii t Q)
l'll 0 .!.! ra u '2; '2; nl "tii ::J ~ ::l U U U > '~ nl co::: Q) nl 'r: :E nl iii .E Q; E "C nl
Z ~ co::: r:: 2 "C "9 "C '" 0 ra .>t:. ~ ~ u r:: Q) :c r:: ,!!! "E ~ 'ijj ~ ~ Q) Qj :;J ? "C
:0 c ,!!! ra ~ :g 0 :; '" "" "" "" ra Iii c= ::l :.c: 0 'x .E .~ "tii E ..c: x '" r::
0 Iii "0 0 <Ii Iii Iii Q) u "" ';:: r:: u :E ra ,~ ~ rJJ ~ ::J
i;j ..,j r:: ,~ 2. 0 E E ij r:: "C ..c ra ra nl nl ra ,~ Q) U rJJ Q) r:: 0 '" rJJ rJJ '" ..c
U Q ra > x <;; <;; u 0 x E "5 "5 "5 iii iii '" .8 ~ '" E '" rJJ i Q) Ql E ra ..c 'B ~ "C ::J ::J Q) Ql 'g
C, 'E Q) Ql ::J .0 'E Q) 0 0 ..c: ..c: x :a :a
'c oq: nl rJJ rJJ '" l/l '" X ra ra Q) Q) Q) ,2 c: r:: r:: r:: r:: E ::J ::J ::J ..c: ..c: 2 ra nl nl "E "E
.~ .~ .~ Q) Q) (; (; 0 Q) Q) Iii ,~ 'r: 'r: nl '" '" co:::
,!!! .n '" '" '" l/l r:: r:: r:: ra 0 nl r:: nl (5 (5 nl ~ r:: ,!::
.1! 0 r:: r:: ! 0 0 <;; nl ra
Cii ::l ..c ..c ..c ::l ::l ::l ::l 0 0 9- "9 '9 u u u c;, > x x 'E ,9- 'E u u 0 0 u :0 E E (5 nl ra '"
0 It: u Q; Iii lii x x x x (5 (5 x x x x x x x x x '" r:: r:: ::J ::l ,~ ..c: ..c: ~ ~ r:: f:l f:l 'C
..c ::I ::l ::J ::J ::J '" '" nl "tii nl nl nl rJJ '" ..c: Q)
m CQ <( <( aJ aJ aJ aJ aJ aJ aJ () () 0 0 0 .!!! .!!! .!!! .!!! .!!! .!!! .!!! .!!! .!!! nl ::l ::l Ql Ql ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 a:: a:: a::
I ..., ..., -, :.::: ...J ...J ...J Z Cl.
; I I , I , I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
II)
:J
II)
-
c:
I'll
n:
"C
Q)
"C
c:
Q)
E
E
o
CJ
Q)
r:x:
~
c:
::::J
o
o
Q)
't:
I'll
E
Q)
.Q
;;:
'"
It)
.....
.'
~
"6l
.5;
r:::
QI
e
CJ
~
CI)
~
QI ~
E CI)
III
Z ifi
~ ~
E ~
E Q:
/3 ~
-r-Ll.I
~
~
Iff
a::
(!)
ffi
:s
Ll.I
Q
~
U5
....
Q
~
a::
G:l
QI
E
III
Z
ii
.!:!
c
.l!
o
m
~
01
,=:
C
01
iii
>
=
~
;:
o
c:
en
C
,Q
~
C
'(3 -0
en 0_ Gi
lli) I~I ;:; '0 5
:::Jill :g~
~.l!!.g 01 _
~ ~~ ~'~
u; i E. 'Og
1lI:::J:!: Q)Ul
.~ > :s Ci E 55
III ~ ~. 010
.>:: _Ul _C
:Q ai "E -Ill
:to 0- >!Il5 RiI
8 "fi Jg 0= t:: c: ....
.?Q)en 0 Go)( 1lI~
~ o=: g :!:. ~u..~ .~ ~
:5~~ -8 E~~Gi ;: ~_Ul
eOiii.3 rl.,gG~~ Q)C:C:
c3~.s ~!.m1UCI) .~>-s~
I; 00 E()U:~I~ c: Elo~l~m
'.:::!:I-=-ol~"C c:1l!! E"C;:I:::
Q)'t-:5I1lc:C:o'iii '-Ill ;:
ii:1lI~l!!U:.!2g-l5iii ~l!!~Q)
01 ~ j u:1~ jlQ g oE ~ Q)I~ Q)I~
gJ 01>1~ 0 01 1lI"8:I:~ gJ..c: gJ,o~
lijl~'t:.c:5I~L9!"C't 01 lij~ lij~
Ig:::J~ ~o~!!!~.,g ~ ~1~lgl~lg
...,:!:()...Ju.O<(c:::oen...,w...,<(
l!!
u:
c:
Oiii
C
:::J
o
:!:
~
oE
:::J
..c:
'ijj
"C
en ; Co -~
~ iii > Q)
ell :l :l! 'gui
!i g:-~ :g. .!!!:! ~~!i
o Ul.c .c:ciciQ),E 01 ell 0
ell !!!;:""(35l5l~o(3rl~llIell
III Q)...Jo ~ 0 c: c: 0 g: 'c III tV III
,2 g- )(8ee:I:....~~:!2'O
2 ~ :Sill Jg Jg Jg 'g 'g rlo orl .!!! 0 o~ EQ)
~:3 ---0)(1) IV:;:]
,!!! E- c: c: C:"C"C 8 O,!!!.c 0)(
'", Ul g: rl rl rl 0 0 0 g E '" '" '"
0':: :::J c: III III III "C "C 0 0 E :::J :::J :::J
CD s::::J !:::.I!:::.I!:::. 00,- '-.-)( >< ><
ii: ii: a: li"li"li' & & ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
1
u;
~
~
?
III
'"
Gi
~
iii
:>.:
o
I
:0
-
r:::
o
CJ
1;-00
It)
.....
I~
l-g
'i:
QI
e
CJ
I~
CI)
~
~
CI)
~
Ll.I
It:
(!)
ffi
:s
Ll.I
~
~
Iff
It:
(!)
It:
~
Ll.I
fa
:s
U5
.....
Q
~
It:
G:l
E ~
~ E E ~
::;:'J..5E
,Q ~ 5 :::J
> .cl::!: ,Q
"85lij?'
j, ~'stg
,-Ia;~o
.ila:~P
:~
III
~
.9!
~
E.
'0 01 ~ .~
g~.Eg
~g~P
.EL:i~~
)(x-E"S
E E E E
:J ::::J :::J :J
E E E E
:::J :::J :::J :::J
.0 .0 .0 .0
5555
~
Sf
.~
1lI
01
lD
Qj
.0
E
III
g
en
B
~
~
:::J
c:::
Ri ~
III 0
B:g C3
'9 c::::::: g
J!! "E ~ ~~
C( ~ '0 en
IV ~ = _
,=: ,=:"C c3 ~
~ Eo :c
1lI E~ iii 1lI
() :::J~ ~ U
~ 0 ~c3"a; '-'-o.~
,.. 'u lD Q).l!!.>::en
CD E:: '-"0 -"'C- U)~ _
~.g ~Qj~ :5.l!! "Co~llIz"C
01.>:: E.c~ .9!1lI oOQ)~~g
~.,g Q)~-.c ()~ 0;:C:01ll;:
:::J()..c:~~m2 Gi~"8~gs~Bc:
lD"Cg:~IIl;:~ Q)>1lI0008():::J~
..c:Q) llIlDenen~;:;:o Q)~
g:c:::lDQ)Q)c:-g:"'C:~"-~1lI01ll
...._2lD"'0~.cQjlllO=~....~....-
.cC:~Q)Q)E:!:C:EI~O~~~",IIl€
~~~~lijEIIl~Ee~~gc:~'g~
o~:::J:::J~o~:::J:::J:::J""Q)Q)!!!o.9!o
lDlDlD~~()lDlDenwGC:::>()C:::enu.
'"'
Q
P)
.'
~
CI)
~
~
CI)
~
g
S
(J
Ll.I
Q
-1lI
-1lI 1ii
E c:
.~ -~ I'e -111 ui
- -lD 1lI III ~
0;:;: Ul E E
~ "C= b 1lI ~ cd
"i:: co O!!!uiep ui.=>.!!!!!!U'.I>",!!!
",Oc:>- >_llI.!2oC:o"2
!!!~ ~rl-6I~.!!og 0 -
Olll ___I~~cdl~llIell~~~ell~
~==OC:OOOlll....:g_~I~O~_
~o"C..c:'~~...Jo-CE--I~ --
"- ~ 0:;; ,2, ~ : 00: 01 8 B ~:: '5 ~
I ~ ::J .g "OI'~ ~ .!! ~ ~ ! 0 .~ 'i:: f1) Q) m
U'.Iem~~;~cmm~=m0~lc:
~cv.-~~c~~m~000~:m~
3~~~~rlolll"":::J:::J:::J:::Jc:c:B~
~~~==~~~=EEEE~B::JU'.I
Q)~::Jcvmmcvf1)~OOOOOOf1)O
<(<(lD()()()()()()()()()()()()Ou.
I 1
f
I
t
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
~
~
-
I/)
:.J
:!
c
tV
ii:
"
G)
"C
C
G)
E
E
o
CJ
G)
n::
~
c
::::J
o
o
G)
~
tV
E
G)
,Q
;;:
GI 'c
E G)
1'lI"C
~I~
I'll Rl
.~ ~
J!~
~~
GI
E.!!!
~ '~
G)
CJ::
0'0
ELL.
E't:
o Rl
u~
~
G)
s:J
G)
32
.~
en
"C
G)
0:: j
CD :E
C ~ ~
~ Ul 1:2
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ en ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ :
CD w ai ~ en
c m - ~
c:: ~ 0 1_ 1:2 J::
~ 3l G) Cl ~ I~ en_
Rl- ::> 1;j lei ~Ic::>:iji E
c: I~...J e ...J Rl ~.~::>
~ 0"C 0 o~ ~~ E
~ ~ ~.. ~ .. g~ F~ ~~
G) v, ... - 0 ~ u -.- Rl
Ul - _,,;:;,n .!!! .- ;:i!. 8 0 > ~
,- 2l Ul,:::- v ,- J::- nO 5'
~ =~ ~~ ~~!~ ~ 8E ~o~ ~~
~ I~~ RIG) ig~ I~ u~ E~EEE~~ s:JU
~ RlUl I~ - c:~J:: 1:2~.!!!~ ::>~::>~::>EEE~-
~N~G)C: I~en ~ ZUlU U Ul::>Rl~J:: C:s:JE~a::>::>::>~E
~g~NI~~ I~_.~.C _ ~~o~o~~om~g ~5~~>cEED~
1'~<J::~Rl~ ~~~~ c~~RlEERlELL.~I';:;I~RlUP>-G)55~~~~~~E
~1~uJ::~ ~fI)~ fl)e ::>E::>C:~I~I~~RI fI) -s:J- ~s:J::>
fI)-~ulm~I~Rl~fI) ~I~en::>en::>enoo-~ ="C~~~~5>5u-E
:5l!l>""I_ ~ ~Cl fI).~~ o='Qjen'Qjen c:~~~_-E...J oQ~.E~_.9! ~ c:~::>
~Rlfl)~-~E~~UlO::::>ClS.9!~fI)J::~I~I~5U~fI)~~~~UlRl~RlRlc:a
G)i~~~8~~I~~~i~~II~I'02~~21~Ul~~~I~~j~~~~~
1~~~E32~UliG)l~ol~ml~~I~m~I!'~I~c:E~~e~c:~"Co::>~~I~"C
j3:B~~~&~~~~I~~u~~~enmloo'oo~8~B<~~?5~8ffie~~
I....
C)
C')
.'
It!
CI)
~
~
CI)
~
g
e
u
r.u
Cl
c: 0
~ ~
~ 0 ~
~ Cl E 0
~ 1Dii:~ =l- ~ ()
U 0 c: J:: m .E 0 ~
~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~:.~ E
RI ~ Cl ~ Ul > 0. - -E 0 ~ ~ ~ fI) ::>
'E _,!!!=_fI) .Ul: .2U ~~ ,~~ ~ ~~ EOE ~
- Ul '-,. 2l 0 ~ u ~ Ul ... - ~ _ J::
~ ~g8 ~~ c: ~m ~~J~~~UlE~ -~EE~E!-
-~~~~~ ~ ~w ro ~~ ~~oE o-"C
-- c: -'- ~,::! _ ~ c:'~ 8 "0 B"5= ~ em c: ~ ~ .a.a~ :::J.g-c
~~o~~~ ~-::>Oo Rl5m ~-0~m~-RlRI::>-55c:s:JRl::>
ExE>'~xRl;~~ENUl!C:~~ RlE~~~3~~~~~~==2go~
UlUlUlRlE::>=~omC:8~~~=~~::>~Rlfl)-u"C.!!!.9!c:0 ~xx
11~~~~::>~~~~E~~.!!!~oii~~~:E~xEEEEEEEEEEE
~EEEc:~~iE-~~O~Ul~U~~mRlRl~~I~~~~~~~~~~~~
fI) RlE RlE mE ~ ~~ > >.~ 0 m ~ c ~ ~ 0 0 0 m m m c' C'I~j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~a~~m~~~~~~~~~~.~.~.~.~~.~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~f~~~~~~~~&~&&&&~MM~~1~55555555555
I I I I i I
I
~
is
0;
OJ
.r:::.
u
~
c
,g
'0
w
"E
:E
Co
.l!l
c:
OJ
0::
Gl
Q.
l'l
II)
"C
c:
OJ
-'
>-
"C
o
~
o
Oi
'"
c:
OJ
~
C2"
()
e.
OJ
'2
.~
:>
'0
II)
Gl
'u
Gl
Q.
en
'E
OJ
0::
c:
,!!!
<:
Gl
>
'jjj
OJ
>
.E
iri
~
c:
l!!
J!!
Gl
,0::
-
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
ZTA 05-05 Farm Worker Housing
AGENDA DATE:
December 13, 2006
SU BJ ECT IPROPOSALlREQU EST:
Public hearing on proposal to amend sections 3, 5, and 10
of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the housing of farm
workers in facilities intended only for temporary habitation,
ACTION: X
INFORMATION:
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Tucker, Foley, Davis, Kamptner, Graham, Benish,
McDowell, Clark
ATTACHMENTS:
Yes
REVIEWED BY:
,----------
!
LEGAL REVIEW: Yes
BACKGROUND:
In April, 2005, the Zoning and Current Development Division of the Department of Community Development issued a
determination that, while the housing of farm workers in structures intended for temporary, seasonal use (i,e" not dwelling
units as defined in the Zoning Ordinance) has existed for decades in the Rural Areas of the County as a nonconforming
use, it is not currently a permitted use in the Rural Areas (RA) zoning district.
Since that time, Community Development staff has been working with the agricultural community and other agencies to
develop an ordinance that would address this situation by allowing farm worker housing as a use in the Rural Areas (RA)
zoning district. A detailed history of this project is contained in Attachment B, the staff report from the Board's public
hearing on this item on September 13, 2006, The ordinance considered at that hearing would have allowed any farm
worker housing facilities only by special use permit.
STRATEGIC PLAN:
Goal 4: Effectively Manage the County's Growth and Development.
DISCUSSION:
At the September 13, 2006 meeting, the Board directed staff to revise the draft ordinance to allow farm worker housing as
a by-right use for up to ten persons in up to two dwelling structures and to allow farm worker housing for more than ten
persons or more than two dwelling structures by special use permit. The ordinance included as Attachment A includes
those changes, The current draft of the ordinance is based on the version considered by the Board on June 7, 2006, which
allowed farm worker housing for up to twenty persons by right and required a special use permit for such facilities housing
more than twenty persons, The current draft (1) follows the Board's direction from the September 13 meeting, and (2)
clarifies that Class B facilities would be processed through a standard special use permit review.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends the Board of Supervisors adopt the draft ordinance in Attachment A.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A - Current Draft Ordinance
Attachment B- Staff Report for September 13, 2006 Public Hearing
06,183
ORDINANCE NO. 06-18(2)
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 18, ZONING, ARTICLE I, GENERAL PROVISIONS, ARTICLE
II, BASIC REGULATIONS, AND ARTICLE III, DISTRICT REGULATIONS, OF THE CODE OF THE
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA
BE IT ORDAINED By the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia, that Chapter 18,
Zoning, Article I, General Regulations, Article II, Basic Regulations, and Article III, District Regulations, is
hereby amended and reordained as follows:
By Amending:
Sec, 3,1
Sec, 10,2,1
Sec. 10,2,2
Definitions
By right
By special use permit
By Adding:
Sec, 5,1,44
Farm worker housing
Chapter 18. Zoning
Article I. General Regulations
Sec. 3.1 Definitions
Farm: The term "farm" means one or more parcels of land, whether such parcels are abutting or not,
operated under the same management and whose primary use is agriculture,
Farm worker housing, Class A: The term "Farm worker housing, Class A" means: (i) structures located
on a farm that are designed and arranged to be occupied exclusively by up to ten (10) persons employed
to work on the farm on which the structures are located for seasonal agriculture work or up to ten (10)
persons including the farm workers and their immediate families; (ii) the number of such structures
designed and arranged for sleeping does not exceed two (2); and (iii) no single structure contains all of
the following: provisions for sleeping, eating, food preparation, and sanitation (bathing and/or toilets),
Farm worker housing, Class B: The term "Farm worker housing, Class B" means: (i) either structures
located on a farm that are designed and arranged to be occupied exclusively by more than ten (10)
persons employed to work on the farm on which the structures are located for seasonal agriculture work
or more than ten (10) persons including the farm workers and their immediate families, or the number of
such structures designed and arranged for sleeping is three (3) or more, regardless of the number of farm
workers or their family members who could sleep in such structures; and (ii) no single structure contains
all of the following: provisions for sleeping, eating, food preparation, and sanitation (bathing and/or
toilets ),
Seasonal agriculture work: The term "seasonal agriculture work" means work by a person employed to
work on a farm to perform either field work related to planting, cultivating, work related to keeping
livestock and/or poultry, or harvesting operations, or work related to canning, packing, ginning, seed
conditioning or related agriculture operations, and the work pertains to or is of the kind exclusively
performed at certain seasons or periods of the year and which, from its nature, may not be continuous or
carried on throughout the year, A person who moves from one seasonal activity to another while
employed by the farm to perform agriculture work is engaged in seasonal agriculture work even though
he or she may continue to be employed by the farm throughout the year,
Article II. Basic Regulations
Sec. 5.1.44 Farm worker housing
Each farm worker housing facility shall be subject to the following:
a, Concept plan to be submitted with application for farm worker housing, Before applying for the
first building permit for a farm worker housing, Class A, facility, or in addition to any other
information required to be submitted for a farm worker housing, Class B, special use permit, the
applicant shall submit a concept plan meeting the requirements of section 5,1.44(b),
b, Contents of concept plan. The concept plan shall show the following: (i) the boundary lines of the
farm (may be shown on an inset map if necessary); (ii) the location and general layout of the
proposed structures at a scale of not more than one (1) inch equals forty (40) feet; (iii) vehicular
access, travelways and parking for the facility; (iv) topography (with a contour interval of no
greater than ten (10) feet); (v) critical slopes; (vi) streams, stream buffers and floodplains; (vii)
source(s) of water for fire suppression; (viii) building setback lines as provided in subsection
5,1.44(g) below; and (ix) outdoor lighting, The concept plan also shall include a written
description of each structure's construction and materials used, and the number of persons to be
housed in the farm worker housing facility,
c, Notice of receipt of concept plan to abutting owners, The zoning administrator shall send notice
of the receipt of a concept plan as follows:
1 , Farm worker housing, Class A, facility: For each concept plan received for a farm worker
housing, Class A, facility, the zoning administrator shall send notice to the owner of each
lot abutting the parcel for which a concept plan has been received within ten (10) days
after submittal of the concept plan deemed by the zoning administrator to be complete,
The notice shall include a copy of the concept plan and shall advise each recipient of the
right to submit written comments within ten (10) days of the date of the notice and the
right to request planning commission review as provided in section 5.1.44(d), Notice
mailed to the abutting owner shall be mailed to the last known address of the owner, and
mailing the notice to the address shown on the current real estate tax assessment
records of the county shall be deemed compliance with this requirement. The failure of
an abutting owner to receive the notice required by this section shall not affect the validity
of an approved concept plan or zoning compliance clearance,
2. Farm worker housing, Class B, facility: For each concept plan received for a farm worker
housing, Class B, facility, notice to the owner of each lot abutting the parcel for which a
concept plan has been received shall be provided in conjunction with the notice required
for the special use permit.
d, Request for planning commission review and action on farm worker housing, Class A, facility
concept plan. An abutting owner to whom notice for a farm worker housing, Class A, facility
concept plan under section 5,1.44(c)(1) and who submitted timely written comments about the
concept plan as provided therein may request that the planning commission review and act on
the concept plan. The request shall be in writing, state the reasons why the commission should
review the concept plan, and be filed with the director of planning within ten (10) days after the
date of the notice from the zoning administrator,
e, Review and action on concept plan. A concept plan shall be reviewed and acted upon as follows:
1, Farm worker housing, Class A, facility. For a farm worker housing, Class A, facility, the
concept plan shall be approved by the zoning administrator or the planning commission,
as the case may be, before any building permit is issued for the facility, The concept plan
shall be approved by the zoning administrator or the commission if it satisfies all
applicable requirements of the zoning ordinance and the design is determined to not be a
substantial detriment to abutting parcels. In approving the concept plan, the zoning
administrator or the commission may impose reasonable conditions to mitigate impacts
on abutting parcels arising from facility, The commission shall give due consideration to
the recommendations of the zoning administrator, the director of planning and other
officials, In addition, the commission may consider such other evidence as it deems
necessary for a proper review of the application.
2
2. Farm worker housing, Class B, facility. For a farm worker housing, Class B, facility, the
concept plan shall be reviewed and acted upon in conjunction with the special use permit.
f, Farm worker housing facilities; permissible structures, Farm worker housing facilities shall not
use motor vehicles or major recreational equipment, as that term is defined in section 4,12,3(b)(1)
of this chapter, to provide for sleeping, eating, food preparation, or sanitation (bathing andlor
toilets),
g, Minimum yards. Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the minimum front yard shall
be seventy-five (75) feet. The minimum side and rear yards shall be fifty (50) feet. All yards shall
be measured from the farm worker housing structures.
h, Zoning compliance clearance, The owner shall obtain a zoning compliance clearance from the
zoning administrator as provided in section 31,2,3,2 of this chapter before a farm worker housing
facility is occupied, subject to the following additional requirements:
1. The applicant shall apply for a zoning compliance clearance at least thirty (30) days prior
to the first expected occupation of the farm worker housing facility, The application shall
be submitted to the zoning administrator,
2. The zoning compliance clearance application shall include all of the following information:
a, Written approval of the farm worker housing facility as a migrant labor camp
under 12 V AC 5-501-10 et seq" the food preparation area, the private water
supply, and the septic disposal system by the Virginia Department of Health,
b. Approval of the access to the site from a public street by the Virginia Department
of Transportation; provided that nothing herein shall be deemed to require that a
commercial entrance be constructed unless such an entrance is required by the
Virginia Department of Transportation,
c, Written approval of the adequacy of the access to the site for emergency
vehicles by the fire marshal.
d, Written approval of the adequacy of the structures intended for human habitation
by the building official.
3, Upon the zoning administrator's determination that all requirements of the zoning
ordinance are satisfied, that all conditions of the special use permit authorizing a farm
worker housing, Class B, facility, are satisfied, and upon receipt of the approvals and
documents required in section 5,1.44(h)(2), the zoning administrator shall issue a zoning
compliance clearance for the facility,
I. Use of farm worker housing facility by workers and their families only. A farm worker housing
facility shall be occupied only by persons employed to work on the farm on which the structures
are located for seasonal agriculture work and their immediate families as provided herein,
j, Use of farm worker housing facility when not occupied, When not occupied by seasonal farm
workers, farm worker housing facilities may be used for any use accessory to a primary
agriculture use.
Article III. District Regulations
Sec. 10.2.1 By right
The following uses shall be permitted in any RA district subject to the requirements and limitations of
these regulations:
3
23, Farm worker housing, Class A (up to ten occupants and up to two sleeping structures)
(reference 5,1.44),
Sec. 10.2.2 By special use permit
The following uses shall be permitted only by special use permit approved by the board of supervisors
pursuant to section 31,2.4: (Added 10-9-02)
51. Farm worker housing, Class B (more than ten occupants or more than two sleeping
structures) (reference 5,1.44),
I, Ella W, Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy of an Ordinance duly
adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, by a vote of six to zero, as recorded
below, at a regular meeting held on December 13, 2006, \".
'"
r'
-r~/^' C ((j( {L LL-
O:3rd of County Supervisors
\
Nay
\~j
Mr, Boyd
Mr, Dorrier
Mr, Rooker
Mr, Slutzky
Ms. Thomas
Mr, Wyant
Aye
y
y
y
y
y
1::
4
.
.
e
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
ZMA 2006-12 UV A Foundation Amendment-Art
Building Annex
ST AFF:
REBECCA RAGSDALE
S U BJ ECT/PROPOSAL/REQ UEST:
Request to Increase total square footage from
535,000 to 565,000 in the Fontaine Research Park
AGENDA DATE:
December 13, 2006
ACTION: X INFORMATION:
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Cillmberg, Ragsdale
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION: INFORMATION:
LEGAL REVIEW: NO
ATTACHMENTS: YES
OWNER/APPLICANT PURCHASER:
University of Virginia Foundation, University of Virginia Health Services Foundation, and the
Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
BACKGROUND:
On November 7, 2006, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this rezoning request
Staff recommended approval of the rezoning and the Commission unanimously recommended
approval, provided that proffers approved with ZMi\ 2004-10 for the research park would be
updated and that a Certified Engineers Report (CER) be submitted with approval of a final site
plan for the proposed building annex, The CER is already a requirement and during the review of
this rezoning staff determined when that requirement should be met with the proposed ART
annex,
DISCUSSION:
The applicant has submitted final signed proffers (Attachment A) to replace those previously
approved for the property with ZMA 2004-10, The proffers have been revised to reflect the
increase in square footage requested with this rezoning application and other minor changes
made to help clarify proffer requirements An illustration has been added as an exhibit to the
proffers to further detail requirements and improve Zoning administration of the proffers
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of ZMA 2006-12 with the attached proffers
ATTACHMENTS:
A ZMA 2006-12 Proffers, Fontaine Research Park, dated November 30, 2006
.,rj", r
r.; U'.:J
.
.
.
Attachment A
Z\1\-2()Ot,-(J 12
PRClFFERS
FO"'TAINE RESLAI\CH PARK
i"(l\L'mhLT :,( I, :2()(J(1
TAX !\\ ;\1' I't-\RCELS 7(,-] 7R 17B( 1 J, ] 71:)( 2 I, I 7E~(,~ J, 17B() J, j 7Bi ()), 1 7B(7). ] 7B( R).
1781>:), cll1(] 17[3(W),
)~ .52 Acres.
C0I11111ercictl Office (CO)
I'ursu~,nll(l Section ~~,~ (lithe :\]bemarL: (ount). Virginiu (uck (the "CUCk"I, und
consistel1l wi t1: the' V\' aler Protection Ordinance, ur "Ordinance''' (C Inpterl 7 of the code) the
(J'vVl1ers (as defined below), or their dul: authurized agents. herch: \'u!untaril: proffer the
conditi()]b listcd below which sha11 be applied w the ahcwe-referencecl parcels, The proffers
contained herein amend. restate and supersede all previous profi'erspenaining w the above-
referencecl parcels, Any previous proffers applicable lei sLlch parcels have either: i) been iull)
smisfied. ii) art' nCI longer applicable. or iii) have been incorporated in their entiret) inw these
protfer;,, These conditions are proffered a', pan of the requested zoning (ZIV1A 20(Jo-O 12 i and it
is agreed thm: 1) The rezoning itself gives rise' w the need J~)] The conditions: 21 sLlch condiTions
have u reasonable relation TO the rezoning requesT: :tncl :; I all such conditions are in conformity
with th;:: Albemarle Coumy Comprehensive Plan,
The A;)plicant ofl:vlA 2006-012 is the t'niversi:) of Virginia Foundation (the
"Applicant'.). successor TO the University of Virginia Real Estate Founcbtion, whicl1 is successor
TO lIREF Research Parks. Inc, The ovmers 0 r parcels oflane! wi thin The F ont:tine Research Park
include the University of Virginia Foundmion. the liniversit) of Virginia Health Services
Foundation. and the ReCTOr and Visitors of the Universit) of Virginia (collectively. the
--0 \.vners"I.
1.
Proffer number 1 from ZMA 2000-,04 bas been satisiled,
.,
Development shall substantially adhere to the Fontaine Research Park Master Plan,
prepared by Draper Aden Associates. last revised AugUST 1 8.2000 ("IVlasTer Plan").
submitted \vith the proffers for ZfvlA 2000-04, which proiIers were accepted as part of
the Board of Supervisors approval of ZMA 2000-04 on September 20, 2000. The Master
Plan replaces in its entirety all previous proffered plans. including the Zoning Application
Plan. dated May 1992. and prepared by McKee/Carson. The locations of cenain
pedestrian ways, greenways and other features haw been indicated on a copy of the
MaSTer Plan which is attached here~o as ExhibiT A,
~
.l,
Proffer number ~ from ZlvlA 2000-04 has been satisfied Zlncl is 5hov:n in Red on Exhibit
A, Tbis path is constructed of asp]laltJi-om hmTall1e ~\ vcnuc TO the point of intersection
WiTh the existing concrete pathway in front Building A. This path sha]] be maintained
by the C>wners under a common maintenance agreement. umil such time as the common
he \
areas are conveyeclto TIle F omaine Research Park Assucicilion (or such other name as
may be selectedpursuam 10 the DeclaraLiun of Protective Covenants and Restrictions for
FomaineResearch Park. dated .I:'l1luar) 2(1- 199~. and recorded a1 Lhe Clerk. s Office of Lhe
Circuit Court o]'the County ofAlhemarlc Virginiu in Deed Book12g6. page 6(4) at
which time the path vvil1be maimainecl h) the Assucimion
4, The University of Virginia Fuundation shall construct Cl pedestrian system \vithin the
Research Park. in general conformance with the system shown on the Master Plan,
Specific feawres fc,r conformity shal1 incluck pedestrian connection from buildings to
other buildings and parking areas, T11c pedcstrian system shall be completed prior to the
issuance ofa Certificate ofCkcupancy for the Life Sciences Annex (LiSA) referenced as
the ART Annex in ZMA 2006-012 and in the location shown in Orange on Exhibit A.
), Total development on the site shall not exceed 565JlOO square feet of gross Door area,
Support commercial uses sballn01 exceed 20J)OO square feet of gross Door area
6, No buildings shall exceed four STories in height. The University of Virginia Foundation
or the Owners under a common maintenance aureement shall maintain the existino
- ~
landscape buffer area in the location shown in Green on Exhibit A to screen the project
from Fontaine A venue and residential neighhorhoods adjoining the Fontaine Research
Park.
7,
STrict architectural and landscape architectural guidelines and reSTrictions shall continue
to govem the design and construction of al1 buildings and parcel specific siTe
development, Such architectural guidelines and restrictions shall be applied and enforced
in accordance with the Declaration of Protective Covenants and Restrictions for the
Fontaine Research Park. dated January 20.1993. and recorded at the Clerl(s Office of the
Circuit Court of the County of Albemarle. Virginia in Deed Book 1286. page 604.
8, Best Management Practices. as approved by the County Engineer, shall be implemented
in all areas of earih disturbing activity, Storm water management shall be accomplished
tlu.ough a combination of new storm water management facilities and modification of
existing sto11n water and/or erosion control facilities, as modified and as shown on the
Master Plan, All required storm water management and BMP structures are existing and
complete as required by the Master Plan, The University of Virginia Foundation will not
create any land disturbance in the area indicated as Resource Protection A..rea on the
Master Plan, except for pedestrian pathways and the sto11n water management facility, (as
shown on the Master Plan) without the approval of the Planning Commission, The
Resource Protection Area is delineated as all the area \vithin I 00 feet of the boundaries of
the I 00 year flood plain elevations.
9,
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the Life Sciences A11l1eX (LiSA) the
University of Virginia Foundation shall dedicate a strip ofland one hundred feet (100') in
width along the entire property boundary adjacent to Morey Creek to the Southern
Railway right-of-way and along the Southem Raih/;'ay right-of-way (as it exists on
September 20,2(00), from Morey Creek to the intersection of such right-of-way and
I
,.,
t:SL~:) ~)
.
.
.
.
.
Slrihlin~ !\\enut (the .-lJn:~e1l\u~ -- J. The (Jrl'e1l\\~I~ Lucaliun i:o SllU\\IJ in ViuJet Ull
E:\hihil.'\, The (Jreel1\v::J\ \vill he CUJl\nn: in Llli ea:oemcm in such f(lrm Lb tbeBuarcl uf
c.;upeni-,m,c. mLI: r~'LJuirL'. Lmet Lh~' \ ni\ LTSI1\ ul \'ir~iniLi !uundLlliun shedl he resJlonsihk
1()!'lhL' cOSI u Li SU]"\L'\ and prcparin!,' tilL' lkt~cl ul L'~ISel1len:, The \ ,ni\ ersil~ Virginia
j'uuncLllio\l will re-;L'r\e in such CL1:oClllClli lilt' ri~,2Ill u' pl'dt:slrian clne[ \ ehicular ]1Llssage
acw:-;S lhe (rreLI1\\~I~ fm access ll' Llclioining pruperlies ;\ pedestrian connection hom
Suiblin!,' ;\ venUL' tu tht' parking ar:~Ll:O skdi he' COllSlrL1ClCd by thl' owner within 1 ~(l days
a request h~ the Zunin~ AdminislrLIIllr ll' du SU, Thl localion (lflhL' pedeslrian
conneclion shLdllx LIS sh()\vn un L~hihil \ Llnel iclemdied as .-Future l't'clesnian Pathvv'a\
III Future CireL'J1\Vay", This pathwLI~ shall ht' cunstructed 10 biking lrail slanclards LIS
defined b~ the VirginiLi (;rt'e11\VLl~ SLlI1cbrcJ~ in pLJct' m the time or c:..:ecLl1ion or' these
proffers,
1 ()
ThiC: UniversiT~ of VirginiLl hluneLttion has ddOplCd. and sball continuL' 10 implement. el
Transponmion Demand Jvlanagemem Plan (TDJvlP) for the Research Park. incorpormin:2
traffic reduction ameniTies (such Lh pedestrian access. as depicted on the cl\laster Plem J.
facilitcuing employer uaffic reduclion measures and prom01ing educational programs,
11,
On or before thL' issuance of a cenificate uf OCCUP~lllCY for the building idemified as the
FUlllrt' ART (~\chanced Research and ~I echnologyi Building on the concept plan dated
Seplember 3. 211Ci4. and initialed SET LlI1d labeled as ~\nachmem B as pan oflbe staff
report for ZIvlA 2004-010. the Uni\ersiT~ Virginia Foundation shall construct m its
expense J bus shelter of a design Jnd in ~I locmicm TC> be reasonably determined b~ the
l'ni\ersit~ of Virginia Foundation upon consul1ation with University Transit Sen'ice.
JAl]};T the liniversity ofVirgini:l HeLilth Services Foundation. and the Albemarle
Count) Transportation Planner. The shelter shall be Of:1 standard size and design based
upon the projeCTed usage and SiTe' ccmsuainls. shall include a bench \-\ith a back. and shall
be maintained by the Chvners uncler Zl common maintenance agreement,
Submitted as of the 30th day ofNovembei' ~()(J() by:
UNIVERSIT\' OF VIRGINIA
FOU1\DA TIOI\
0\AA ~,~~
UNIVERSITY OF VIRGI~L~
HEALTH SERVICES FOlTNDATION
., "7- / '
By: ,/ / &i 1..L !.... d-:;[l1"ri_j/;/,.v~,
tvlarc Dettmann. Chief Executive Oflicer
Owner of tax map parcels: 76-] 78. 1 7B( ] ),
17B(3). 17B(5). 17B(6). 17B(7). and 17B(X)
OVl'ner of lax map parcel: 76-] 7B(2)
THE RECTOR AND VISITORS OF THE CJ\l\'ERSITY OF VIRGINIA
. B\': ~.v~._____,
Leonard W, Sandridge. Executi,e Vice PresidenT and
I'" r' \,
~' I~, "
"I
L
j
.,
Chief Operating OfCicer
.
Owner oi laX map parcds: 76-17B(g) and 17B(\;\' i
COivHvlON\VL'\LTl-l OF VIRCIIJ\IA
..e-rFT7COU!\T\' OF AUX'TVi/,iI H . to \vll:
The foregoing ir1Slrumenl was acknO\vkdged hefore me thisJjjil da~ of November 2006
by 1';1:11R, Rose. Secretary ofthe Ulliversi~) orVirgini~1 Foundation,
My Commission expires: 5 j j/, ,2 C JO
PaU(~L' , J, ?-/}J aJ:1
l\Jotan Public j
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
~COUNTY OF j/klfk1r.l~ . to WIt:
The foregoing instrument \vas acknowledged before me this ~~ay of November 2006
by Marc Denmmm. ChiefExecurive Officer oithe UniversiTY of Virginia Health Services
Foundmion,
My Conullission expires: ,11 ~ :5 (, ,;; 0.0"
)j~~
Notary Public
.
COMl\101\JWEAL TH OF VIRGINIA
CITY/COUNTY OF AI~PrY"Ie.. . to WiT:
The foregoing instrument was ack,nowledged before me this.3:)~ay of November 2006
by Leonard W. Sandridge, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the Rector
and Visitors of the University of Virginia,
My Commission expires:
I ;;).(31 JOlt>
/ I
j~LQL
Notary Public
.
4
GD S LJ
.
.
.
~p
.>
"i
~m
:J )(
:J -.
III ~
-. "0
-1:J..,
.., cc 0
~n::s:
CII 0 CD
"T1:J'"
O:J!
c: CD
:J !l
c. -.
III 0
_:J
O'
2.
r
III
::J
"c.
... UI
o n
~Ill
lD"
... lD
~tIl
CIlc:
;:
...
i-- ~~ n
~~O~ =
=
q ~ V\ O~ = ~~
; ll" 4VP 90- 4
=
8 """a
i~11 ~ ~e > \I.} 0
l:I: -
j- f 0) =-~ ~~
I lid .f~ ~= (")l~ ftl=
a. ; =- -. s= ~>~
. l!I!j~ ~.....
!~II! f a... :LfI)~ .,,,
I ..r.t.l o&t:l -_. >~>
~ :; ;- _. ftl=
>" 9 ~~"ll ~~ ,. ftl
cg-
~a == = 2.::z ~> ~n~
. III- ri ~ ...CI' so = <" ~~ .,<
...~ =~
-., <g,_.~ 113. ~
II S. JOYJ _. ., ~
ia .~ Q,
N_ ii Ct. 5. C' !.=
I~ i g:g -.0...., I=ftl
.=,.,..
m
>< V\J
~ 0
C" l./)
;::;:
> ~
.
.
e
':.--
(
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community DevelopmelI1lt
401 Mdntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (434) 296-5832
Fax (434) 972-4012
November 27,2006
Todd Marshall
UV A Foundation
P,O, Box 400218
Charlottesville, VA 22904-4218
RE: ZMA-2006-012 UV A Foundation - Advanced ]Research & 'fecltmology Building AlI1lnex
(Signs #35, 36, 40) Tax Map 76 Parcels 17B, 17B6
Dear Mr. Marshall:
The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on November 7, 2006, unanimously
recommended approval of ZMA-2006-0 12, UV A Foundation-Advanced Research & Technology Building
Annex to the Board of Supervisors, subject to staffs recommended changes to the proffers and the
requirement that a Certified Engineer's Report is submitted with approval of a final site plan for the
proposed building annex.
Please be advised that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors will review this petition and receive
public comment at their meeting on December 13, 2006.
If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted action, please do not hesitate to
contact me at (434) 296-5832.
Sincerely,
i0ut!~ 16:~rbLr
Rebecca A, Ragsdale
Senior Planner
Planning Division
RAR/aer
cc:
Ella Carey
Jack Kelsey
Amelia McCulley
Steve Allshouse
.
.
e
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
PLANNING STAFF REPORT SUMMARY
Project Name: ZMA 06- 12 UVA Foundation Staff: Rebecca Ragsdale
Amendment for ART Building Annex
Planning Commission Public Hearing: Board of Supervisors Public Hearing:
November 7,2006 December 13, 2006
Owners: University of Virginia Foundation Applicant: University of Virginia Foundation
Acreage: 5.9 acres Rezone from: CO with proffer to CO with
amended proffers,
TMP: 76-17B By-right use: Office/Research Park Zoned CO
Location: Fontaine Research Park on Ray C. and approved for up to 535,000 square feet
Hunt Drive on Fontaine Avenue Ext,
Magisterial District: Samuel Miller Proffers: Yes
Proposal: Amend proffers to allow additional Total Requested Square Footage: 565,000
building space of 30,000 square feet.
DA (Development Area): Neighborhood 6 Compo Plan Designation: Office Service
Character of Property: Research Park and Use of Surrounding Properties: Research park
open space and open space immediately; residential to the
east of park,
Factors Favorable: Factors Unfavorable:
1 The building expansion can be Staff has not identified factors unfavorable to this
accommodated by the existing site plan, req uest
without adverse impacts to the physical
environment, other activities on the site, or
nearby properties and neighborhoods,
2, The research park is located within the
urban area, close to the City, and
concentrating office and research activities
in this location places jobs close to areas of
dense population,
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of ZMA 2004-010, provided that proffers are
revised based on staff recommendations and that a Certified Engineers Report is submitted with
approval of a final site plan for the proposed building annex,
STAFF PERSON:
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE:
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS DATE:
Rebecca Ragsdale
November 7, 2006
December 13, 2006
.
ZMA 200 UVA RESEARCH PARK AMENDMENT
PETITION:
PROJECT: ZMA 2006-12 UVA Foundation-Advanced Research & Technology Building Annex
PROPOSAL: Rezoning on CO-Commercial Office (offices, supporting commercial and service
uses; and residential use by special use permit at 15 units/ acre) zoned property to allow an
additional 30,000 square feet for a building square footage total of 565,000,
PROFFERS: Yes
EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE/DENSITY: Office Service - office uses,
regional scale research, limited production and marketing activities, supporting commercial,
lodging and conference facilities, and residential (6,01-34 units/acre) in the Development Area,
ENTRANCE CORRIDOR: Yes
LOCATION: Ray C, Hunt Drive in the Fontaine Research Park, located on Fontaine Avenue,
adjacent to the northeast of the Rt.29/250 Bypass in Neighborhood 6 of the Development Area,
TAX MAP/PARCEL: TMP 76-17B, 17B6
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Samuel Miller
CHARACTER OF THE AREA:
Fontaine Research Park has seven existing buildings, primarily involved with medical services
or health-related research, with the exception of AIMR and the front building which houses the
University's development office. Beyond the park boundaries but accessed via Ray C. Hunt
Drive are the Forestry Building and associated warehouse, Nearby are the Nob Hill subdivision,
Buckingham Circle neighborhood, Piedmont housing area (UVa) within the County and the Fry's
Spring and Jefferson Park Avenue neighborhoods within the City.
.
SPECIFICS OF THE PROPOSAL:
The applicant is seeking to amend an existing proffer approved with ZMA 2004-10, to allow
additional square footage within the University of Virginia's Fontaine Research Park for research
and laboratory space. Attachments B-E explain the applicants request and provide a tally of
square footage within the research park as well as exhibits showing the Advanced Research
and Technology (ART) building. An existing proffer limits total buildings in the park to 535,000
square feet. (Attachment E) If approved, this proffer amendment would add 30,000 square feet,
increasing total park capacity to 565,000 square feet. The proposed expansion will add
additional research space for the approved ART facility and will be located in basement annex
underneath an approved parking area. Because research equipment typically occupies a larger
spatial area than standard office furnishings, a larger research building may generate the same
number of people (and cars) as a smaller office building, Zoning has determined that parking
should be adequate and specifics will be addressed with the site development plan,
ZMA 2006-12 Fontaine Research Park Amendment
Planning Commission 11/7/06
2
.
.
.
.
APPLICANT'S JUSTIFICATION FOR REQUEST:
The proposed expansion is to add a basement annex to an existing approved building in the
park called the Advance Research and Technology (ART) building for additional research space
and will have limited traffic impacts, (Attachment B)
PLANNING & ZONING HISTORY:
In June 1992 the property in question was rezoned (ZMA 92-03) from PD-SC and R-10 to CO
Commercial Office with proffers and a proffered plan of development. A special use permit (SP
92-13) for supporting commercial uses, research and development activities, including
experimental testing was also approved with a condition that a Certified Engineers Report be
provided to ensure compliance with the provisions of Section 4,14 of the Zoning Ordinance,
Medical and pharmaceutical laboratories was also approved in 1992 with the rezoning, Since
then, the site has been subdivided to provide individual parcels for each of the institutional uses
referenced above, In September 2000 amendments to the original ZMA and SP were
approved, allowing an additional 1 06,000 square feet and bringing total research park square
footage to 495,000. In October 2004, a rezoning was approved (ZMA 2004-10) that allowed an
additional 40,000 square feet of for a current maximum of 535,000 square feet of building area,
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
Land Use Plan
The park is recommended for Office Service in Neighborhood Six of the Comprehensive Plan,
Land Use Plan, Recommended Office Service uses include the following:
· Office parks and mixed-use planned developments emphasizing office uses and
regional scale research and office uses providing information and professional services
to the County and the larger region, Limited production activities and marketing of
products may be included.
· High density residential, commercial, and motel/hotel/conference facilities may be
included as a secondary use,
· Office Service designation requires a large site size (20+ acres), arterial road
accessibility, water and sewer availability, and compatibility with adjacent land uses,
The applicant's proposal is also consistent with the preliminary findings and recommendations
of the Southern Urban Area B Study (accepted by the PACC but not yet adopted by the
County), which identifies Fontaine Research Park as an existing Neighborhood Center and
acknowledges and supports the potential for additional development within the park, both
employment related and supporting commercial. Similarly, the applicant's proposal does not
conflict with any of the connector road alternatives between Fontaine Avenue and Sunset
Avenue Extended identified and evaluated by the study, The 1988 JPA/Fontaine Area B Study,
predecessor to the current study, stated that these [Research Park] parcels should be
considered for rezoning, after completion of feasibility studies by the University,
ZMA 2006-12 Fontaine Research Park Amendment
Planning Commission 11/7/06
3
The Neiahborhood Model
The Neighborhood Model, an adopted part of the Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Plan, sets
forth twelve principles for evaluating development proposals within the Development Area,
Neighborhood Model principles are not strongly reflected in this research park, which pre-dated
the County's current policy and embodies a more suburban approach to development. Those
which are reflected to some degree in this proposal and/or in the park are:
Pedestrian Orientation Although the organization and dimensions of the research park do not
make it an easy pedestrian environment, there is a sidewalk network
linking buildings within the park, and linking the park network to
Fontaine Avenue which has a pedestrian facility.
Neighborhood Friendly Landscaping and streetscaping make many of the internal streets
Streets and Paths attractive for pedestrians,
Interconnected Streets The applicant has an existing proffer to construct a bus shelter for
and Transportation transit riders to improve waiting conditions, Currently, the site is
Networks served by JAUNT and a hospital van shuttle. The recommended bus
shelter would serve the CTS route when it commences,
Mixture of Uses The proposed site and adjacent parcels are characterized by a limited
mixture of uses including office, laboratory, clinical/medical and
institutional/educational. Residential uses are located nearby,
Neighborhood Centers The park serves as an employment-oriented neighborhood center,
and has the potential to become a better center with the addition of
supporting commercial uses, It is an important regional employment
center.
Site Planning that Development in the park has been oriented away from sensitive
Respects Terrain environmental features
Parks and Open Space The design of the research park includes a central green element and
preservation of natural areas on the edges of the site, The applicant
previously proffered to dedicate land along Morey Creek for a
greenway,
Mixture of Housing No residential uses are proposed in the research park but a variety of
Types and Affordability residential uses are located nearby,
Redevelopment This proposal will add building square footage underneath a proposed
parking lot. It is not redevelopment, but is expanding within the same
developable area determined with the master plan for the park,
--
ZMA 2006-12 Fontaine Research Park Amendment
Planning Commission 11/7/06
.
.
4
.
.
STAFF COMMENT:
Relationship between the application and the purpose and intent of the requested zoning
district
The applicant is requesting an amendment to the existing proffers to allow additional office use
in a CO Commercial Office district. The purpose and intent of the CO district is to permit
development of administrative, business and professional office and supporting accessory uses
and facilities, The district is intended as a transition between residential districts and other more
intensive commercial and industrial districts, The proposal meets the intent of the CO Zoning
District.
.
Anticipated impact on public facilities and services
Roads- No adverse impact to roads is anticipated with the addition of 30,000 square feet to the
Fontaine Research Park as it is anticipated that the research and laboratory uses will have
lower occupancies,
Water and Sewer- Adequate water and sewer are available to serve the site, The Albemarle
County Service Authority (ACSA) commented on the site plan (SOP 2005-00121) for the ART
building and referenced those comments, A site plan amendment will be needed for the
proposed basement annex and the ACSA will also review those plans, (Attachment G)
Stormwater Management- Since this facility will be primarily underground and located beneath
the previously approved parking area, there are no other significant issues (ex, stormwater
management, grading, critical slope impacts, etc,),
Schools- There will be no impacts to schools,
Fiscal Impact- A fiscal impact analysis was not requested since the additional square footage
does not significantly change employment numbers, but is more to accommodate spatial needs
of the ART building,
Anticipated impact on cultural and historic resources
No impact is expected on cultural or historic resources,
Anticipated impact on nearby and surrounding properties
There may be some waste products generated by the research lab and vivarium, It is the intent
of the University Foundation that this facility will be occupied by the University of Virginia and
operated by the University Occupational Health and Safety and the Facilities Management
departments. The County Engineer has recommended that prior to the approval of a final site
plan, the applicant shall submit a letter and supporting documentation addressing the
performance standards of Code 18-4,14, to the satisfaction of the county engineer, This shall
include the University Occupational Health and Safety and the Facilities Management
department standard procedures and related documentation for the storage and disposal of
chemicals and waste products associated with the operation and maintenance of this facility,
.
Public need and justification for the change
The University's medical research program would benefit from the building expansion, ultimately
benefiting the general public as well as other University affiliates.
ZMA 2006-12 Fontaine Research Park Amendment 5
Planning Commission 11/7/06
PROFFERS:
The existing proffers for the research park, which were updated with ZMA 2004-10 are attached,
(Attachment F) The applicant intends to amend Proffer 5 to increase the total development on
the site to 565,000 square feet of floor area, Staff has also recommended that Proffers # 3 and
Proffer #4 of ZMA -2004-10 be revised to make the approval of the site plan for this addition to
the ART Building subject to the greenway dedication and completion of the pedestrian system in
the research park, The applicant has not yet submitted revised proffers, which would replace the
previously approved proffers, for review but intends to do so in time for the Board of Supervisors
meeting in December and agrees with the staff recommended revisions,
.
SUMMARY:
Staff has identified the following factors favorable to this rezoning request:
The building expansion can be accommodated by the existing site plan, without adverse
impacts to the physical environment, other activities on the site, or nearby properties and
neighborhoods,
2. The research park is located within the urban area, close to the City, and concentrating
office and research activities in this location places jobs close to areas of dense
population,
Staff has not identified factors unfavorable to this request.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of ZMA 2004-010, provided that proffers are revised based on staff .
recommendations and that a Certified Engineers Report is submitted with approval of a final site
plan for the proposed building annex,
ATTACHMENTS:
A - Vicinity Map
B - Applicants Justification and Gross Square Footage summary letter to Elaine Echols dated July 27,
2006
C - UVA Fontaine Research Park ART Building exhibit
D - UVA-ART Life Sciences Annex-Basement Level Plan for annex
E - UVA ART Annex Schematic Design
F - Existing Proffers approved with ZMA 2004-10 for the UVA Fontaine Research Park
G - Albemarle County Service Authority from Gary Whelan to David Pennock dated November 29, 2005
ZMA 2006-12 Fontaine Research Park Amendment
Planning Commission 11/7/06
6
.
Albemarle County GIS-Web
.
.
.
o Tax Map Grid
- Overview Roads
o Road Bridges
- Road Centerlines
- Roads
. Buildings
- Driveways
- Elevation Contours (10 ft)
o Parcels
lakes and Reservoirs
Ponds
Major Streams
Other Streams
Attachment A
Geographic Data Services
Room 227
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
All data is provided for graphic representation only. The
County of Albemarle expressly disclaims all warranties of any
type, expressed or implied, Including, but not limited to, any
warranty as to the accuracy of the data, merchantability, or
fitness for a particular purpose.
Aerial Imagery @2002 Commonwealth of Virginia - Maps are for internal use only.
1
Attachment B
~
--........--
1111111
---
UNIVERSITY rfVIRGINIA
FOUNDATION
.
July 27, 2006
Ms, Elaine Echols
Albemarle County Office Building
401 Mcl ntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
RE: UVA Fontaine Research Park
Request for Zoning Map Amendment
Dear Ms, Echols:
This letter serves to request a Zoning Amendment for additional developable square
footage in the UVA Fontaine Research Park, This request is due to a necessary
addition to the Advanced Research and Technology (ART) Building, a state-of-the-art
research facility which will house internationally known scientists.
This rezoning will enable the ART building to house additional research space which is
critical to the operation of the facility and which will be beneficial to the University as a .
whole.
You may recall a prior rezoning also requested additional square footage which was
approved by the County in October of 2004, This amendment was to allow for the
requested growth of one building site to accommodate the ART building, You may also
recall that the building footprint changed moderately; however, the general area was
consistent with the prior Fontaine Master Plan documents.
Interestingly, the addition will be almost entirely underground (under the existing parking
lot) and therefore, will not add any additional impervious surface and will not be visible
with the exception of a small mechanical structure which is shown on the attached
drawings. The addition will essentially expand the basement floor of the ART Building,
The addition will house a maximum of 20-25 persons at any given time and is not
expected to impact the shared parking arrangement currently in place, We will work with
UVA and the County to arrive at an agreeable shared parking arrangement if any
modifications or clarifications are seen as necessary, This issue was discussed with
John Shepherd and others at the pre-application conference held in May, Mr, Shepherd
has worked with us in the past and was supportive of this adjustment pending his review
of a parking plan,
The low census in the additional building is not seen as materially impacting the vehicle
trips per day currently entering and leaving the Park,
.
PO, Box 400218
Charlottesville, VA, 22904-4218
Phone: 434-982-4848 . Fro.:: 434-982-4852
\W{\\', UVA Foundation,com
6
Attachment B
.
~
...........--
1111111
-~-
UNIVERSITY if VIRGINIA
FOUNDATION
The spreadsheet below shows the current Fontaine Research Park square footage tally.
The information came from site plans and has been generally verified by Albemarle
County, You will note this spreadsheet specifically requests an additional 27,500 gross
square feet. This requested number was based on the tally as indicated and may
change if the County has different information of which we are not aware, If this is the
case, obviously we will amend this request as soon as we have been told of any
discrepancy by the County. We assume this will not delay the rezoning request or
impact the review schedule.
Gross Square Footage (GSF) Summary
Approved Site
Plans
.
CFA Institute
Parcel A
Parcel C
Parcel 0
Parcel F
Aurbach Research Center
Clinical Office Building (COB)
ART Building
Total Built GSF
Total Current Zoning Approval
Current GSF Available Balance
72,500
60,000
45,500
62,500
60,000
71,025
68,784
85,110
525,419
535,000
9,581
Advanced Research and Technology Building Annex
Available Balance
Total Base Additional GSF Needed
32,500
(9,581 )
22,919
Total Additional Square Footage Requested (rounded with buffer)
30,000
Thank you for your assistance on this project and as always, feel free to call with
questions or comments, I will be out of town until August 14th. If you need to contact the
Foundation prior to that time, please request to speak with Todd Marshall, Project
Manager,
.
P.O. Box 400218
Charlotte,ville, V/>" 22904-4218
Phone: 434-982-4848 . Fax: 434-982-4852
www.UVAFoundation.com
q
u
-
=
QJ
e
.c
l;,#
eo:
-
-
<
'1
1
,~
II: !-
.tj
oS::
~
l:t
.~
e
~
"l:
.. .. .. .
.....
......
......
........
....... ..........
- ._L.!.-'_;~J_t........I___ .. ; : : .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ~
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. :....-..... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
. ..:::........ :--:-:---- . . . : : : . . . . . . . . : .
.. .. .. .. .. .. : : : : .. .. .. .. .. .. .. : : : :-r.....--'_:.... .. : : : : .. .. .. .. .. .
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. : .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. : .. .. .. .~ .. .. : .. .. .. .. .. .
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. " .. .. -,.......... .. .. .. .. .. .
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..e.....~...... .. .. .. .
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. fI .. ; : ......., .. .. ..
.... .."'\...
..........' .
~.......:'~::
. .. .. .. .. .. .. ...........~....
Attachment C
"
,g
{l
!i
~ ~~
.~ J ~
:~ J!
~J
,5' ~ d
~
~
Ol)
~
......
~
.....
......
::s
a:l
~
o
~o
C':J]
~ u
..s:::: a)
~~
C':J~
~ ~
a)C':J___
~..s::::~
a)~~
~ C':J
...... a) '-"
C':J CI:l
"S a)
o~
~~
~ 8
~ a
-6
-<
~
a)
CI:l
o
~
8
~
.. ~
<::,
<:::>
'"
II
~
....
Ji
l:t
c}5 fO
Q
-
=
~
8
--
<
iii
<..l
'c
'"
III III -5
.0
.0 '" Ql
'" .....J :::E
.....J
.r: Ql 15
II <..l 5 t:
:;; '0 0
Ql 2l Q.
III 0 Q.
Ql Ii. ::l
a:: en
0 0 0
fJulPl!nS UN paAoJddv
~
I
. $
xauuv saouaps am pasodoJd I
I
I
I
rIG
-
_s
-
-
-.
-.
.
if
-~I::- :
-~-'--
mnn
wnw
D D~
J,
II
r
I
I
I
o
J i 0
jl
o
.
/:;>:::; -::~;;~-
/ ,,' ,," ,,'" .... 1:)..........
I " ,,' ,,' ,,' /,'IJ
I ,,',," .-,;" .."",.; /'
I I ' , /'
/ / " ," ..,' /' /'
" " " ,,' /'
" " I . / .-
/ : :, \ \ ~
\ \ \ \ \ \
\ \ \ \ \ I
\ \ \ \ \ ;
\ \ \ \ I :
\ \ \: \
\\\\\
\ \ \ \ \
c. / : : \ \
OJ, '\' , I J
~ \ I ~,' ,,' /
, \ \,
.. ,,'" /'
.... /' ..
,,' /'.... ...
," / ," ,..,,,,
,. /"'-
( ,"'- - /" "
I I I ( -. / " "
: " ,\, \ .;:..0 /" " /'
, I, '\, ,,/ ,,' I,' I /
\, I I " /
\\,,' ,'/
\ \ \ '\ " I
\ \ \ I, I
\ I I L \ \ I
\ I I I 101
I I ': I '!I I
i ,',' I : I :
: ' : : ~ : I ~
Attachment D
0..0
N
lU CD
>.0
lU 0
....J__
__ U
~O
E(Y')
lUN
l/)
ro
co
o
(0
o
C')
o
-
~
VI
::i
~
x
Q)
c
c
<C
III
Q)
U
C
Q)
'0
VI
~
~~
I- +
a: III
<C c
~:g
~~
11
~ ~~ ..
"3f~
- .8.0: .; l !
= .~ .
~ ",2 jJiii J! It I
s on.!! .~
c J~~ GtH h c
.c: "" i fill :;;;
'Vi i!l~ . · l~l!$ 8-
~ Q) s-g .
~ 0 ~~ ~ G ~ .. ~
- "~ ] j "'j r !:
- ~ J~~ lr lb
< , -a ~ t'l ·
~ 0." gA~h 1 ~b Il:
u ,g. ji I: ~ll +
.~
.r::; ,I j~
u
:( ::1Il; ~L ~
11_ ir ]
h ~h1: 1
il ,rrl:J
9-lJ 1 h.
if lltjl~
B G ~ f' $
tJl g'~" ~
~8' :-.H h.
-II
.II r
~
~ I
l,
r
I
I
I
I
I
~
j $ .
1
:::>
a
!
10
:?
Ji
~
!ii
[[
DlI
o
'<t
t::
o
c.
Q)
e::
c
><.~
~ :fi
cO
<( u
t;:~
<( E
:;~
::JVJ
o
N
~ I
~B~~ !ii~~f.~'~11~r~1
]~u~ 'OJ! ~J"'g.~....a' _. _
I~' C . I H~
~~~:i f~ li 1l5!!~:if!ii:fl=-
;g loi ~~,~hjllau:l! _
~"'1l '811$'" ~ a~ ill
;:;-f;ll. ,,;
w
c
,2
U
Q)
(/)
o
Attachment E
!~ $
It 110 t
,:?E ~ I'"
HiH
~Jh:ll
hlH
.
o
N
l'L
Attachmenlt F
ZMA-2004-010
PROFFERS
FONT AlNE RESEARCH PARK
October 13, 2004
TAX MAE PARCELS 76-17B, 17B(l), 17B(2), 17B(3), 17B(5), 17B(6), 17B(7), 17B(8),
,
17B(X), and 17B(W).
53.52 Acres, Zoned Commercial Office (CO)
Pursuant to Section 33.3 of the Albemarle County, Virginia Code (the "Code"), and
consistent with the Water Protection Ordinance, or "Ordinance" (Chapter 17 of the Code) the
Owners (as defined below), or their duly authorized agents, hereby voluntarily proffer the
conditions listed below which shall be applied to the property. The proffers contained herein
supersede all previous proffers pertaining to the above-referenced parcels. Any previous proffers
applicable to such parcels have either: i) been fully satisfied, ii) are no longer applicable, or iii)
have been incorporated in their entirety into these proffers. These conditions are proffered as part
of the requested zoning (ZMA 2004-010) and it is agreed that: 1) the rezoning itself gives rise to
the need for the conditions; and 2) such conditions have a reasonable relation to the rezoning
request.
. The Applicant of ZMA 2004-010 is the University of Virginia Foundation (the
"Applicant"), successor to the University of Virginia Real Estate Foundation, which is successor
to l3REF Research Parks, Inc. The owners of parcels of land within the Fontaine Research Park
include the University of Virginia Foundation, the University of Virginia Health Services
Foundation, and the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia (collectively, the
"Owners") ,
1. Proffer number 1 from ZMA 2000-04 has been satisfied.
2. Development shall substantially adhere to the Fontaine Research Park Master Plan, prepared
by Draper Aden Associates, last revised August 18,2000 ("Master Plan"), submitted with the
proffers for ZMA 2000-04, which proffers were accepted as part of the Board of Supervisors
approval of ZMA 2000-04 on September 20,2000, The Master Plan replaces in its entirety
all previous proffered plans, including the Zoning Application Plan, dated May 1992, and
prepared by McKee/Carson.
3. Proffer number 3 from ZMA 2000-04 has been satisfied. The pedestrian path that was
constructed pursuant to proffer number 3 from ZMA 2000-04 is located within the common
areas of the Research Park and will be maintained by the Owners under a common
maintenance agreement, until such time as the common areas are conveyed to The Fontaine
Research Park Association (or such other name as may be selected pursuant to the Declaration
of Protective Covenants and Restrictions for Fontaine Research Park, dated January 20, 1993,
.
-1-
1'3
f
and recorded at the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the County of Albemarle, Virginia
in Deed Book 1286, page 604) at which time the path will be maintained by the Association.
.
4. The University of Virginia Foundation will construct a pedestrian system within the Research
Park, in general conformance with the system shown on the Master Plan. Specific features for
conformity shall include pedestrian connection from buildings to other buildings and parking
areas,
5. The Unoiversity of Virginia Foundation will limit total development on the site to 535,000
square feet of floor area. Support commercial uses shall be limited in building area to 20,000
square feet of gross floor area,
6. All buildings will be limited to four stories in height. The University of Virginia Foundation
will maintain the existing landscape buffer area to screen the project from Fontaine A venue
and residential neighborhoods adjoining the Fontaine Research Park.
7. Strict architectural and landscape architectural guidelines and restrictions shall continue to
govern the design and construction of all buildings and parcel specific site development. Such
architectural guidelines and restrictions shall be applied and enforced in accordance with the
Declaration of Protective Covenants and Restrictions for the Fontaine Research Park, dated
January 20, 1993, and recorded at the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the County of
Albemarle, Virginia in Deed Book 1286, page 604.
8. Best Management Practices will be implemented in all areas of earth disturbing activity. .
Storm water management shall be accomplished through a combination of new storm water
management facilities and modification of existing storm water and/or erosion control
facilities, as modified and as shown on the Master Plan. All required stormwater management
and BMP structures are existing and complete as required by the Master Plan. The University
of Virginia Foundation will not create any land disturbance in the area indicated as Resource
Protection Area on the Master Plan, except for pedestrian pathways and the storm water
management facility, (as shown on the Master Plan) without the approval of the Planning
Commission. The Resource Protection Area is intended to be delineated as all the area within
100 feet of the boundaries of the 100 year flood plain elevations.
9. At such time as the Board of Supervisors approves of a plan of development for a
pedestrianlbicycle and greenway improvements for the Morey Creek/Stribling A venue area,
the University of Virginia Foundation shall dedicate a strip of land, at least one hundred feet
(100') in width along Morey Creek up to the Southern Railway right-of-way (as it exists on
September 20, 2000), then north, along the Southern Railway right-of -way to the intersection
of such right-of-way and Stribling Avenue (the "Greenway"). The Greenway will be
conveyed in fee simple or in the form of an easement, as the Board of Supervisors' approval
may require, and the University of Virginia Foundation shall be responsible for the cost of a
survey and preparing the deed or deed of easement, as applicable. The University of Virginia
Foundation may reserve in such dedication necessary access across the Greenway to the
Southern Railway right-of-way in the event that such right-of-way is ever used for commuter
rail service. The Greenway may be established at any time as detetmined by the Board of
.
-2-
11
.
.
.
f
Supervisors. A pedestrian connection to the Greenway shall be made at such time as
improvements arc made to establish the pedestrian and bicycle paths as part of the Greenway,
and improvements are made to Stribling A venue to include paving and street lights.
10. The University of Virginia Foundation has adopted, and shall continue to implement, a
Transportation Demand Management Plan (TDMP) for the Research Park, incorporating
traffic reduction amenities (such as pedestrian access, as depicted on the Master Plan),
facilitqting employer traffic reduction measures and promoting educational programs. The
TD.MP shall offer employee surveys to be conducted by, or with the guidance of, the
Thomas Jefferson District Commission, or a similar organization. Surveys will be available
to develop specific programs for employers within the Research Park tailored to commuter
needs. The TD.MP shall stress increased awareness of available altemative transportation
means in and around the University community, including van service between the medical
campuses, University and City transit systems, employee benefits, and parking shuttle
service. The TD.MP will establish or promote means for reducing single occupancy vehicle
use, including but not limited to providing educational programs on ridesharing, striping
high occupancy vehicle parking spaces and installing bicycle racks near buildings. The
TD.MP shall be available to existing and future employers and employees at the Research
Park via appropriate and effective means.
11. On or before the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the building identified as the
Future ART (Advanced Research and Technology) Building on the concept plan dated
September 3, 2004, and initialed SET and labeled as Attachment B as part of the staff report
for ZMA 2004-010, the University of Virginia Foundation shall construct at its expense a
bus shelter of a design and in a location to be reasonably determined by the University of
Virginia Foundation upon consultation with University Transit Service, JAUNT, the
University of Virginia Health Services Foundation, and the Albemarle County
Transportation Planner. The shelter shall be of a standard size and design based upon the
projected usage and site constraints, shall include a bench with a back, and shall be
maintained by the Owners under a common maintenance agreement.
Submitted as of the / :z.t;ay of October, 2004 by:
UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA
FOUNDA TION
By:~ 72.~~
Tim R. Rose, Secretary
UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA HEALTH
SERVICES FOUNDATION
By:
Marc Dettmann, Chief Executi ve Officer
Owner of tax map parcels: 76-17B, 17B(l),
17B(3), 17B(5), 17B(6), 17B(7), and 17B(X)
Owner of tax map parcel: 76-17B(2)
-3-
1<)
F
THE RECTOR AND VISITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA
e
By:
Leonard W. Sandridge, Executive Vice President and
Chief Operating Officer
Owner of tax map parcels: 76-17B(8) and 17B(W)
,
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
CITY/COUNTY OF IHhelYlC/r'/e..., to wit:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 1'2 day of October 2004 by
Tim R. Rose, Secretary of the University of Virginia Foundation.
My Commission expires: ;Z{a..(f 3 ~ ;LtJo 7
~(lcuJi(
Notary Public
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
CITY/COUNTY OF , to wit:
.
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of October 2004 by
Marc Dettmann, Chief Executive Officer of the University of Virginia Health Services
Foundation.
My Commission expires:
Notary Public
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
CITY/COUNTY OF , to wit:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of October 2004 by
Leonard w. Sandridge, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the Rector and
Visitors of the University of Virginia.
My Commission expires:
\\REA\2296 19,6
Notary Public
.
-4-
/&
-
e
.
.
Attachment G
TO: David Pennock, Planner
FROM: Gary Whelan, Civil Engineer
DATE: November 29, 2005
RE: Site Plan Technical Review for: U.Va.-Art Minor Site Plan
Amendment
(TM 76, Parcel 17B)
The below checked items apply to this site. SDP-2005-00121
x
1. This site plan is within the Authority's
jurisdictional area for:
A. Water and sewer
B. Water only
C. Water only to existing structure
D. Limited service
2. An 8 inch water line is located onsite.
3. Fire flow from nearest public hydrant, located 170'
distant from this site plan, is 2783 gpm ~ at 20 psi
residual.
4. An 8 inch sewer line is located onsite.
5. An Industrial Waste Ordinance survey form must be
completed.
6. No improvements
within existing
and
and
approved.
No plans are required.
Final water and sewer plans are required for our
review and approval prior to granting tentative
approval.
Final site plan may/may not be signed.
RWSA approval for water and/or sewer connections.
x
x
X
X
X
or obstructions shall be placed
or future easements.
plans are currently under review.
plans have been received and
7.
8.
X
9.
10.
1I.
12.
Comments: Backflow prevention required. Abandon existing
sewer line.
The site plan does not show or incorrectly shows:
meter locations
waterline locations
sewer line locations
easements
waterline size
sewer line size
expected wastewater flows
expected water demands
11
.
.
.
Albemarle County Planning Commission
November 7,2006
The Albemarle County Planning Commission held a work session on Tuesday,
November 7, 2006, at 6:00 p.m., at the County Office Building Auditorium, Second
Floor, 401 Mcintire Road, Charlottesville, Virginia. Members attending were Eric
Strucko, Calvin Morris, Vice-Chairman; Jon Cannon, Marcia Joseph, Chairman and Bill
Edgerton. Absent were Duane Zobrist and Pete Craddock. Julia Monteith, Senior Land
Use Planner for the University of Virginia, representative for David J. Neuman, FAIA,
Architect for University of Virginia was absent.
Other officials present were Wayne Cilimberg, Planning Director; David Benish, Chief of
Planning; Rebecca Ragsdale, Senior Planner and Greg Kamptner, Deputy County
Attorney.
Call to Order and Establish Quorum:
Ms. Joseph called the regular meeting to order at 4: 11 p.m. and established a quorum.
ZMA 2006-012 UVA Foundation-Advanced Research & Technology Building
Annex (Signs 35.36,40):
PROPOSAL: Rezoning on CO-Commercial Office (offices, supporting commercial and
service uses; and residential use by special use permit at 15 units/ acre) zoned property
to allow an additional 30,000 square feet for a building square footage total of 565,000.
PROFFERS: Yes.
EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE/DENSITY: Office Service - office
uses, regional scale research, limited production and marketing activities, supporting
commercial, lodging and conference facilities, and residential (6.01-34 units/acre) in the
Development Area.
ENTRANCE CORRIDOR: Yes.
LOCATION: Ray C. Hunt Drive in the Fontaine Research Park, located on Fontaine
Avenue, adjacent to the northeast of the Rt.29/250 Bypass in Neighborhood 6 of the
Development Area.
TAX MAP/PARCEL: TMP 76-17B, 17B6.
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Samuel Miller.
STAFF: Rebecca Ragsdale
Ms. Ragsdale summarized the staff report and gave a power point presentation.
. This request by the University Foundation is to increase the approved square
footage in the Fontaine Research Park. The site is zoned Commercial Office. It
was first zoned in 1992, but along with that came a set of proffers and a plan that
limit the square footage on the site. With each space needs increase it has been
incrementally increasing since 1992. The Fontaine Research Park is still
designated as Office Service in the Comprehensive Plan. Within the Research
Park it is the last building that is under construction, which is referred to as the
ART Annex.
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION - NOVEMBER 7, 2006
DRAFT MINUTES - PARTIAL ZMA-2006-12 UVA FOUNDATION
. The ART building itself has been approved with a site plan. The applicant is
requesting the annex, which would be underneath parking. The proposal is to
increase the total square footage approved in the research park from 535,000 to
565,000 square feet. Staff provided the Commission with the illustrations that the
applicant provided, The proposal is to add the annex underneath the parking as
shown on the previous plan.
.
. Staff evaluated the request with each of these increases, There was one in
2004, which increased from 495,000 up to the 535,000 square feet that is
approved. The Foundation has seen with this particular user that they need
more lab space. So this particular request did not bring with it any impacts that
staff was concerned about in terms of traffic or impacts on the site. It is within
the developable area that was approved with the original ART Annex Building.
. Therefore, staff recommends approval based on that with the two conditions.
The revised proffer statement has not been submitted, which will reflect the
square footage increase, and also to update some of the other proffers as
recommended by zoning. Then there is the requirement that was recommended
by the County Engineer that calls out the requirement for the Certified Engineer's
Report to describe the uses that go in to the building to make sure that there are
no negative impacts from that. When the property was rezoned for Commercial
Office carried with it special use permits for the lab facilities research and
development. As a condition of that special use permit the Certified Engineer's
Report is required. Staff is recommending that it is something that happens at
the final site plan stage for the building.
.
Ms. Joseph opened the public hearing and invited the applicant to address the
Commission.
Fred Missel, Director of Design and Development for the Foundation, said that this
request does extend the opportunity to do state of the art research at the Fontaine
Research Park. He thanked staff for the clear presentation. It does not change any of
the uses that are in existence in the Fontaine Research Park currently. The facilities
are rather unique in that it is 100 percent underground with the exception of one area
that is used for ventilation that is adjacent to the existing building. The additional parking
that is required by this is minimal. They feel that they can work that out very clearly with
the Zoning Department. He has had conversations with John Shepherd regarding that.
In addition, the traffic generation will obviously be minimal as well. Others present this
evening were Tim Rose, the CEO of the Foundation and Tom Marshall, Project
Manager. If there were any questions, he would be happy to answer them.
Mr. Edgerton asked if they were comfortable with staff's recommendations about the
proffers.
Mr. Missel replied yes, they are comfortable with staff's recommendations.
.
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION - NOVEMBER 7,2006
DRAFT MINUTES - PARTIAL ZMA-2006-12 UVA FOUNDATION
2
.
.
.
Ms. Joseph asked if they are ever going to amend this to add some more commercial
space so that they can actually have people working in this space that don't have to
leave.
Mr. Missel replied that they have actually looked at including commercial space in the
buildings as they stand now. Honestly, the space for research is so valuable and so
limited that it has been found that research has to trump that in this case. As they go
forward with the growth of the park there is a good chance that is something that might
be needed and will be included in the future plans.
Ms. Joseph invited public comment. There being none, she closed the public hearing to
bring the matter before the Commission for discussion and a possible action.
Motion: Mr. Cannon moved, Mr. Strucko seconded, to approve ZMA-2006-012, UVA
Foundation-Advanced Research & Technology Building Annex, subject to staff's
recommended changes to the proffers and that a Certified Engineer's Report is
submitted with approval of a final site plan for the proposed building annex.
The motion passed by a vote of 5:0. (Commissioners Zobrist and Craddock were
absent. )
Ms. Joseph stated that ZMA-2006-012, UV A Foundation-Advanced Research &
Technology Building Annex will go to the Board of Supervisor on December 13 with a
recommendation for approval.
(Recorded and transcribed by Sharon Taylor, Recording Secretary)
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION - NOVEMBER 7 2006
,
DRAFT MINUTES - PARTIAL ZMA-2006-12 UVA FOUNDATION
3