HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-03-31March 31, 2010 (Adjourned Meeting)
(Page 1)
An adjourned meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, was held on
March 31, 2010, at 5:00 p.m., Lane Auditorium, County Office Building, McIntire Road, Charlottesville,
Virginia. This meeting was adjourned from March 17, 2010.
PRESENT: Mr. Kenneth C. Boyd, Mr. Lindsay G. Dorrier, Jr., Ms. Ann Mallek, Mr. Dennis S.
Rooker, Mr. Duane E. Snow and Mr. Rodney S. Thomas.
ABSENT: None.
OFFICERS PRESENT: County Executive, Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Attorney, Larry W.
Davis, Clerk, Ella W. Jordan, Deputy Clerk, Mr. Tom Foley
Agenda Item No. 1. The meeting was called to order at 5:00 p.m., by the Chairman, Ms. Mallek.
_______________
Agenda Item No. 2. Closed Meeting.
At 5:00 p.m., Mr. Thomas moved that the Board go into closed meeting pursuant to Section 2.2-
3.711(A) of the Code of Virginia under Subsection (1) to consider an administrative appointment. Mr.
Boyd seconded the motion. Roll was called and the motion carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Mr. Rooker, Ms. Mallek, Mr. Snow, Mr. Thomas, Mr. Boyd and Mr. Dorrier.
NAYS: None.
__________
Agenda Item No. 3. At 5:21 p.m., Mr. Thomas moved that the Board certify by a recorded vote
that to the best of each Board member‟s knowledge, only public business matters lawfully exempted from
the open meeting requirements of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act and identified in the motion
authorizing the closed meeting were heard, discussed, or considered in the closed meeting. Mr. Rooker
seconded the motion. Roll was called and the motion carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Mr. Rooker, Ms. Mallek, Mr. Snow, Mr. Thomas, Mr. Boyd and Mr. Dorrier.
NAYES: None
_______________
Agenda Item No. 4. Pledge of Allegiance.
Agenda Item No. 5. Moment of Silence.
_______________
Agenda Item No. 6. PUBLIC HEARING to receive comments on Proposed Operating and Capital
Budgets for FY 2010/2011 and the Proposed FY 2010 Tax Rates. (Advertised in the Daily Progress on March
23, 2010.)
Mr. Tucker said he appreciates this opportunity to present the Board of Supervisors the proposed
operating and capital budget for FY 11. He stated he would like to start by commending County citizens for
expressing their passionate and deeply held beliefs within the boundaries of civil and dignified community
discussion throughout this budget process.
He said that they recognize that balancing this budget has required very difficult choices that will
change the nature of County service levels and funding support in fundamental ways, and while the Board
has been able to restore funding to some community agencies, there are still programs and services that
will be impacted significantly due to the County‟s dramatically reduced revenues resulting from the
economic downturn throughout this nation.
Mr. Tucker said the County believes this budget confronts the difficult realities of meaningfully
reducing and reshaping the organization, and positions county government to be sustained within
declining revenues over the long term. This repositioning, which they anticipate will continue in the
coming year, requires establishing reasonable expectations for local government services that recognize
reduced funding and staffing levels. Strategic investment is also critical going forward in determining how
to build back core services and capital needs as additional revenues become available in the future. Mr.
Tucker said they appreciate the public‟s presence here this evening and will open up for public comments
at the conclusion of his presentation.
Mr. Tucker started by reviewing the County‟s multi-year response to significantly declining
revenues and substantial mandated increases like revenue sharing with the City of Charlottesville and
debt service for capital needs. He explained this proactive approach has allowed the County to achieve
the kind of expenditure reductions required in these challenging times, with meaningful savings and
efficiencies being realized each year since the beginning of the downturn three years ago. He stated that
since the fall and winter of 2007, the County has implemented aggressive expenditure reductions
including operational savings and efficiencies, position reductions and staff reallocations to make sure the
finances are stable and the organization is responding to changing workload levels. As he has stated
several times during this budget process, the County has focused on repositioning itself as a local
government that is sustainable over time in the new economic reality it faces.
Mr. Tucker said they have achieved funding reductions and reduced and repositioned staff in
every local government functional area between FY 09 and FY 11 for a total of 75 positions eliminated,
frozen or offset by other revenues among other cost savings. The most significant reductions have
March 31, 2010 (Adjourned Meeting)
(Page 2)
occurred in Community Development and Fiscal/Management Services functional areas. In Community
Development for example, 33 positions have been impacted, 11.4% decrease in funding in that area; and
in Fiscal/Management Services, 24 positions have been impacted and a reduction in funding of 5.6%. He
added that although they have tried to protect core service areas to the greatest extent possible, some
reductions have been made there as well. Human Services, for example, have been impacted with seven
positions; and Public Safety, including judicial, 10 positions were impacted, including five frozen police
officer positions.
Mr. Tucker said that in light of these funding decreases and staff reductions and repositioning, the
community is experiencing some very real service impacts. He said that he would like to share a few of
the most significant impacts with the public: they have closed the Visitor Assistance Centers at both
County Office Buildings, here and at 5th Street; closed the Finance drive-thru window except for two
months each year; significantly reduced community engagement and public participation efforts; delayed
response to non-health and safety-related zoning violations; discontinued County follow-up on
environmental concerns; limited the County‟s stream buffer program to only enforcement; discontinued
neighborhood traffic calming work; eliminated dedicated ongoing funding for ACE and new funding for
master plan implementation; discontinued the community policing function; delayed progress in improving
public safety response times; reduced financial, credit and fair housing counseling services; eliminated
first-time homebuyer down payment assistance programs; and suspended the greenway acquisition
program.
Mr. Tucker said he would now focus on the FY 11 proposed budget for next year. The total
proposed operating and capital budget is $292.2 million after State revenue changes for both schools and
local government, and various expenditure adjustments. This figure reflects a total decrease of $11.9
million, or 3.9%, from FY 10, which is the current fiscal year and adopted budget. It also reflects a total
decrease of $41.5 million, or 12.4%, from the FY 09 adopted budget of two years ago.
Mr. Tucker then presented a pie chart showing the major areas of expenditure for the total County
budget. The School Division will receive approximately 61%, General Government would receive
approximately 33%, and 6% goes to the City Revenue Sharing Program. Mr. Tucker stated the chart
includes all federal, state and local revenue sources that go towards supporting all of the expenditures. He
added that there has been a lot of discussion about School revenues and expenditures, and there was
some uncertainty about some of the State funding for schools at the time of his recommended budget. He
added that he would now provide an update on the school funding situation for next fiscal year.
Mr. Tucker said the original shortfall in the School Board‟s budget request was approximately $8.8
million. Since that time, there have been adjustments in the State‟s funding to the School Division. The
hold harmless decision on the composite index resulted in an additional $5.2 million in revenue; there was
an additional State revenue adjustment of $1.2 million, and there was also a savings realized in VRS
contributions that totals about $4.5 million. He added, when you take the original shortfall and apply the
new total State adjustments to that figure, you end up with approximately $2.1 million in positive revenues
for next fiscal year. Mr. Tucker said they recognize that the School Division is concerned about the
anticipated one time nature of some of these State revenue adjustments and they would prefer not to
commit these funds to ongoing expenses, so they are proposing to use $2.6 million of those funds for one
time capital purchases. W hen that amount is deducted from the positive revenue total of the $2.1 million, it
creates a shortfall for the FY11 budget year of approximately $464,000. Mr. Tucker said that staff heard
in the last several days from the School Board a desire to replace the funding for two School principals
back into their budget request, which would bring their shortfall to approximately $700,000. He added that
if you take a look at State funding sources for FY12, which the School Board is concerned about, you will
see that the composite index hold harmless revenue is going to be basically reduced from $5.2 million to
about $2.6 million, plus VRS is going to start increasing again to about $840,000, which results in a total of
about $3.4 million that will be impacted in FY12.
Mr. Tucker said there are some differences in General Fund revenues between the recommended
budget presented in February and this proposed budget. First, the State budget approved recently by the
General Assembly provides for less reduction in some areas of State funds than Governor Kaine‟s
proposed budget, which was used as the basis for the budget the County Executive presented in
February. Mr. Tucker added those areas primarily include funding for Constitutional Officers and for the
Finance Department, and come to a total of $350,000 in additional State revenues beyond what was
originally anticipated. Because the Board restored funding for the Scottsville Community Center, they will
see a small increase in revenue from that restoration. Family Support transfer from the Schools of about
$189,000 reflects funding for three Family Support positions who work in partnership with the Bright Stars
pre-K program to assist families and students in achieving academic success. He added this amount,
which is the School‟s share, reflects approximately 19% of the total cost of the program; local government
currently funds about 45% and the rest is funded by grants. In terms of the Bright Stars Program, Mr.
Tucker said the State is restoring the program to a full 12-month program instead of just the 11-month that
they had originally been under the impression they would have to go to. He added the total revenue
increases amount to about $541,120.
Mr. Tucker said during their work sessions, the Board, at their discretion, chose to replace funding
for some community agencies which created the following changes in General Fund expenditures:
Emergency Housing Repair, the Board put $10,000 back into the program; Jefferson-Madison Regional
Library, a little over $158,000 was added; Family Support workers – $188,795, Jefferson Area Board for
Aging - $14,024; and the Scottsville Community Center - $36,337. There is a total expenditure increase of
about $437,503. Mr. Tucker added that the difference between the adjusted revenues and the adjusted
expenditures is about $103,000, which is being added to the Board‟s reserve to provide funding for some
unanticipated emergency needs next year.
March 31, 2010 (Adjourned Meeting)
(Page 3)
In summary, Mr. Tucker said he would like to reemphasize some key elements of the
recommended budget. Staff followed the Board‟s direction in bringing forward a budget balanced on a
74.2-cent tax rate, making $11.9 million in reductions from last year to stay within available revenues. At
this tax rate, the average taxpayer will see a reduction in their tax bill compared to last year. Staff has
been proactive in identifying savings and responsive in repositioning the organization, with the result that
local government staffing is at FY 02 per-capita levels. This budget proposes an additional 20 positions to
be eliminated, frozen, or offset for a total of 75 positions or 11% of our workforce. He added that three
Family Support positions originally not funded are funded by the School transfer funds in this proposed
budget that was talked about earlier.
Mr. Tucker said they followed budget-reduction principles by protecting core services to the
greatest extent possible. As an example the largest departmental reductions from FY 09 through FY 11
occur through efficiencies and restructuring in our Fiscal/Management Services area and recognition of
decreased workload in the Community Development area. He added this budget reduces the Capital
Improvements Program by $106.6 million, or 64% over the next five years. Mr. Tucker said they have
continued the County‟s commitment to local funding for schools; in this proposed budget, .65 cents of
every local tax dollar goes to support School operations and debt service. He added the Board‟s reserve
has been increased to $210,372 to provide a small amount of funding for unanticipated emergency
expenditures for next year. Finally, he added this budget restores funding to some community agencies
as directed by the Board of Supervisors.
Mr. Tucker explained that the Board is scheduled to adopt the FY11 Budget, and set the tax rate
on April 7th. He then turned the meeting over to the Board Chair to proceed with the public hearing.
Ms. Mallek then explained the rules and operating procedures for the public hearing. She stated
that each presentation from attendees should be limited to no more than two minutes with the Board‟s
goal being to listen fully to what each speaker has to say.
Mr. Davis clarified that this is a combined public hearing for both the budget and the tax rate.
At this time the Chair opened the public hearing.
Mr. Dave Oberg said he is a resident of Crozet. He said that the meeting a few weeks ago was
estimated to have over 700 attendees with parents, students, teachers, and today the room is about half-
empty. Mr. Oberg stated that he is disappointed and holds the Board responsible for it. Mr. Oberg stated
that the Board‟s decision not to increase the tax rate and not fund the schools has taught the people who
were so excited about participating that their voice doesn‟t matter. He said that when he tried to get
people from his PTO to come to this meeting, they were reluctant because they felt their opinions didn‟t
matter. He hopes that does not become the policy of this Board.
Mr. Jim Morris said he is a resident of the Jack Jouett District. He said that he asked the schools
to provide him the per-pupil costs. He noted that from 2000-2009, factoring in inflation, the per-pupil cost
increased by 75%. He said that if most of those things are government mandates, then Albemarle should
just say no. He added that for over 100 years the County educated children without any federal
assistance. The County should reject assistance when it comes with strings attached. Mr. Morris said
that the figure doesn‟t even include capital costs which is disturbing because that cost can range
anywhere from 23% to 90% in under reported costs per pupil.
Ms. Betty Sevachko, a 24 year resident of the County, thanked the Board members who did not
raise the tax rate, thus resulting in smaller tax bills. These are hard times for most residents and living
within their budget, and taking care of their family, is the top priority. She said that this is a good first step,
but there is much more to do in the area of spending. Ms. Sevachko stated that she worked 30 years for
IBM, 10 years with a private school in Charlottesville, and five years with a state agency. She emphasized
that the private sector encourages employees to find ways to do their jobs better and save money, but she
does not see that focus in the government sector. Ms. Sevachko said that more money is not always the
best way to solve problems, and they need to understand needs versus wants. She stated that hard
choices must be made now that will pay off big in the future with a more financially secure and prosperous
Albemarle County. She stated they need to think outside of the tax box.
Ms. Zoe Carroll said that she is a Senior at Albemarle County High School and her dad is a P.E.
Teacher at Hollymead Elementary School. She has grown up knowing that education is a big deal. Ms.
Carroll stated that it concerns her that classes graduating after hers may not have the same level of
quality in education that she has had. She said that the benefits to raising the tax rate are great schools,
libraries, roads, and other services guaranteed for future generations. Ms. Carroll said that providing a
great education now will help ensure that many baby-boomers who are working now will be taken care of
when they are older. She stated that raising taxes is really just investing in education and the future.
People need education because they are always dealing with problems that need to be solved.
Supporting education is not a partisan issue. Education is the start of ending wars, ending poverty, finding
ways out of economic downturns, and finding answers to climate change crisis.
Mr. Bill Goldeen, parent of a County student, said that a large portion of constituents at the last
meeting voiced heartfelt concerns about the immediate and long-term detriment to the education system
and County without adequate money to allow the system to live up to its reputation. The Board ignored
their request to raise property taxes to at least maintain current funding. In fact, the Board maintained the
status quo which leaves them at a deficit for this critical and important budget year. He also expressed
disappointment in Board members‟ campaign promises to analyze the current spending and find ways to
decrease spending as a means of saving money. He has not seen any evidence that the Board looked at
March 31, 2010 (Adjourned Meeting)
(Page 4)
the line-item budget of the Schools or General Government. All he heard about was parody which they
heard in the public. Constituents deserve more. The Board‟s job is to maintain the commons for its
constituents – police, schools, roads, water, sewer, etc. He said that eliminating the CIP to justify the tax
decrease just pushes the burden onto the next generation, similar to the poor decisions made at the
federal level that have led to collapsing bridges, failing roads, and an overloaded electric delivery system.
Since this tax decision is irreversible, the Board needs to find other means for righting this wrong and
finding the needed funding to maintain a high level of education and quality of life. Mr. Goldeen
emphasized that the tax base will only go down over time if Albemarle doesn‟t invest in it now and it
becomes a less than desirable place to live. The reputation of the School system is a factor when a
business or family chooses the location. At this time the only way a locality can raise funds is as the state
tells them so the Board needs to educate the constituents as to how it will raise money. The Board needs
to tell the citizens to advocate at the State level to give them new and better revenue funding sources.
Ms. Pat Napoleon said that many local residents continue to express serious concern relating to
the former Board‟s vote to funnel taxpayer money for a super-sized YMCA in McIntire Park. She thinks
that decision was ill-advised and fiscally irresponsible. She sees a moral conflict in using parkland for this
purpose. This Board is not acting on its message for environmental stewardship by promoting plunder of
parkland. She has heard loudly and clearly that the education system needs money. She said the money
given to the YMCA is badly needed in the County. She thanked Mr. Thomas, Mr. Boyd, and Mr. Snow for
challenging an extremely poor judgment. She asked the Board to work to regain this funding for County
citizens.
Mr. John Frazee said that he is acting Co-President of Interfaith Ministries. He stated that he co-
chaired a March 22nd meeting of IMPACT, at which 1600 members came together and 33 congregations
of all faiths. They pushed for and received significant commitments from the City and County law
enforcement in the areas of interpretive services to help community members with limited English
proficiency. He also said that they received commitment from the School Board Chairman to target 90%
as the proportion of low-income children to be enrolled in publicly-funded pre-K programs in the County, to
report and publish achievement gap data annually for low-income children at kindergarten and 3rd grade
levels, and to propose to the School Board that the School Division begin collaborative discussions with
the City on phased expansion of pre-K services for these children. Mr. Frazee thanked the Board for fully
funding Bright Stars, and encouraged them to work with the schools and Social Services on the services
he mentioned.
Ms. Charlotte Hogue thanked the Board for not raising the tax rate. She emphasized that there
are many areas of spending that need to be scrutinized, such as County employee benefit packages. The
School administration has only one budget idea and that is more and more money each year. Ms. Hogue
stated that if parents want their children to participate in activities, they should pay for them. Parents need
to be responsible for taking care of their children and not expect the taxpayers to do so. She also said
that social welfare programs provide no incentives for people to help themselves, and four and five
generations on welfare is not right. Other areas to look at include fees for Library services and taxes from
tourists for special events. She asked the Board to look closely at any program or service before it
approves it to see if it is cost effective and serves the needs of all County residents. She asked the Board
to review existing budget expenditures and approve only if it is a need, not a want. She asked the Board
to look at what can be saved for the taxpayer, not how much can be spent.
Ms. Margie Shepherd, a County resident and member of the Albemarle Education Association,
said that most people in the County share in the exasperation felt when the Board asked for public input
and then ignored it in their vote to lower taxes and reduce support for education. She said that this
approach is penny wise and pound foolish. The Board will have to reserve money it did not for VRS, deal
with State‟s adjustment to the ability to pay formula, pay catch-up with capital projects that will surely cost
more in the future. Ms. Shepherd stated that Boulder County, Colorado, which is demographically similar
to Albemarle, has a tax rate of $1.39 per $100. She also criticized the Board for portraying the school‟s
shortfall as only $400,000 instead of the $6.0+ million short from last year. In addition, local government
took two cents of state revenue out of the budget and then put it back on their side which made schools
down almost 4.5% but local government down only .33%. Just a few years ago local government and the
schools were working together with a vision of attaining a world class system but instead the Board voted
to lower taxes effectively sabotaging those efforts. She hopes that next year they can have reasonable
and open discussions about the kind of County they want before setting the tax rate. She will be teaching
166 students next year but she will make time for those discussions.
Mr. Ron Price thanked Board members for all of the hours they have put into this budget process.
He stated that the two-year financial picture looks even worse for the coming year, noting that the State
has essentially plugged the gap for next year with one time revenues. Mr. Price said that it took some of
the immediate pressure off, but the hold harmless payments will dry up. The School Division is trying to
reposition its organization to create a sustainable future. He stated that plugging funding gaps with one-
year money is not a sustainable strategy; it is one that postpones hard work that must be done by the
School Board and Supervisors to align recurring revenues with recurring expenses. He added it is making
a bet that things will just get better next year. The School Board does not believe that using short term
revenues from the State to fund long term recurring expenses including small schools represents sound
financial management. Mr. Price emphasized that the School Board remains very concerned about this
short-term strategy and the future of the schools in the County as a result of three years of reductions in
revenues, and increases in enrollment and operating costs.
Ms. Diantha McKeel said they come to the Board as School Board members knowing that
revenues are declining, knowing that the Board has more to think about than schools and knowing that
citizens are feeling the impact of the recession and grateful for tax relief. The School Board took fiscal
March 31, 2010 (Adjourned Meeting)
(Page 5)
responsibility for this economic reality. The School Board met without question the reduction of $4.0
million in local funds to the School Division as the result of a flat tax rate, as well as the first round of cuts
in Governor Kaine‟s budget, on top of millions in additional cuts over the last three year. She stated that
the school Board does not just sit back and ask for more money. They made the hard choices to reduce
the size and scope of the School Division; some extremely unpopular reductions in the community. Ms.
McKeel emphasized that even after making adjustments for State cuts, the Schools are left with a
recurring funding gap of $464,000, which is short of meeting what is needed to meet a sustainable funding
request. That meant more than $6.0 million in cuts in the face of higher enrollment, demand for services,
and increased operational costs. She said that the Board of Supervisors found $159,000 to fully fund the
Jefferson-Madison Regional Library, and $275,000 to join VML and support JABA. Ms. McKeel said when
something is a priority to you, the Board of Supervisors, you have been able to find the money within the
total operating budget at the current tax rate. She asked the Board to acknowledge the deep cuts the
Schools have made and find the money in their budget to cover their recurring funding gap.
Mr. Robert Hogue, a resident of the Samuel Miller District, said that unemployment is up in
Virginia and the state has run out of money to pay unemployment benefits. He emphasized that benefits
for government employees are not sustainable and need to be cut, especially for new employees. Mr.
Hogue stated that people should have to pay for library books, parking at recreational sites, and lost pet
recovery. Music and arts should be after school activities with parents paying the costs. He said that
parents should donate to the schools as they get the lion‟s share of the County budget. Parents should be
responsible for their children‟s diet and exercise. He thanked the Board for not raising the tax rate.
Mr. Shannon Wilder, President of the Lane-Babe Ruth Baseball League, said that the Lane
League provides organized, recreational baseball for area youth between the ages of 13-19, and has been
doing so for over 50 years. Mr. Wilder stated that they play ball in the field by the recycling center. The
County has been paying and providing for electrical service for their field lights since the League raised
the money to install the lights in the early 1990s. He said they are an all volunteer organization and are
good stewards of the County‟s land. The dugouts, concession stand, and batting cage have been erected
and provided through donations and volunteer efforts, and all these increases the value of the field. He
said that the League provides all of the seed and fertilizer for the maintenance of the field. They will
receive approximately 325 player registrations this year of which about 85% are County residents. They
have been informed by the Parks and Rec Department that the County will stop funding $5,300 annually
for field lights at the end of this year. They encourage support of all youth organizations, but not at their
expense. Last year they operated on a deficit budget mainly due to $4,500 in major repairs to the field
lighting system which they paid. This year they anticipated a little less than $1,000 surplus if all
fundraising goals were reached, however due to the economic climate it looks like their goal will not be
met. They already do not have enough teach sponsors and had major plumbing repairs that will result in a
bill of over $4,000. He stated that they will be operating in a deficit again this year. Their only alternative
is to raise registration fees by about 20% which will make it impossible for many of the youth to play
baseball. Mr. Wilder said the League is just not in a position to absorb any additional cost. He asked the
Board to reinstate funds to light their playing field.
Mr. Bob Rash, a resident of the White Hall area, said on behalf of residents of that area, he
thanked the Board for being fiscally responsible to the residents of Albemarle County.
Ms. Mary Ann Doucette, a resident of White Hall, thanked the Board for holding the line on taxes.
Ms. Doucette said that she is a member of the Tea Party movement, which stands up against additional
taxes. Retired people salaries are fixed; they do not get increases annually like government workers. She
emphasized that it is important that the County practice zero based budgeting from this point forward,
because if the mentality continues that taxes need to be raised, people will be forced to move out of the
County. She said it is important to remember that there are a lot of people in the County who are suffering
financially.
Mr. Sachin Doshi, a High School student, said the last time he appeared before the Board he
asked it to justify the cuts they were making, but he didn‟t receive a response. He said that he has been
trying to become active in making changes in his school before he leaves for college, because he has
seen changes that could be made. He said that more funds should be diverted from the existing tax rate
to the Schools and or the Supervisors should intervene and actively help the School Board find more
funds. Mr. Doshi stated that he doesn‟t think the Board is doing enough to reduce the Revenue Sharing
amount it sends to the City. He added that $90 average isn‟t that big of a savings for taxpayers. He then
encouraged Board members to become more active in cutting unnecessary spending.
Mr. Claude Monger said that it‟s encouraging to see new Board members and to see that taxes
will not be raised. Every year he appears before the Board and asks them to not raise his taxes and to
spend the money wisely. He said that he lost his job last year through downsizing and is now on Social
Security, and now it takes two monthly Social Security checks to pay his property taxes. In 1969 he built
his house for $13,500. Mr. Monger said that people in the County are struggling to make ends meet and
are cutting expenses every way possible, so government should do the same. He added that he‟s glad
other people are willing to give more, and that‟s great if they choose to do so. Mr. Monger said that he
also would like the Revenue Sharing Agreement to be revisited, as the City benefits tremendously from
this “sugar daddy” every year. He does not like the idea of giving his tax money to the City so they can live
“high on the hog” and he has to suffer the consequences.
Mr. David Frazier said that he is a property owner and small business owner as well as a lifelong
resident of the County. His company employs four people, one of which is a property owner in the County.
He said that all of his personal and business taxes combined contribute over $10,000 annually to the
County, and this is borderline oppressive. Mr. Frazier stated that there are many other business owners
March 31, 2010 (Adjourned Meeting)
(Page 6)
who feel the same way, but don‟t wish to come forward for fear it will impact their businesses. He stated
there is no God-given right to a job or an education. He added that Mr. Tucker and his staff could do a
better job of managing the County‟s resources by starting with administrative waste and moving onto
employee performance, if necessary. Mr. Frazier emphasized that education is a privilege and a family
responsibility that needs to be addressed by those using the service, and instead of handing children over
to the state and expecting others to pay for them. He added more money does not equal higher quality
education. He encouraged all areas of County government and schools find 10% in savings in their
budgets and then set the tax rate accordingly. As a small business owner, he knows that can be done.
Mr. Tony Townsend said he is President of the Jefferson Madison Regional Library Board of
Trustees. The JMRL Board thanks the Supervisors for returning the Library to level funding for the
coming fiscal year. He emphasized that cutting vital library services would send the wrong message to the
community, and he hopes to work more closely with the Board in the coming years to develop future
budgets and library improvements.
Mr. Peter Wurzer said that a recession is not the time to raise taxes, but is a time to examine
spending and reassess real needs. Mr. Wurzer said that these efforts will result in a stronger, leaner, and
more effective government that will respond with vigor when the economy improves. He stated that more
needs to be done to ensure that every dollar is working to provide the needed services in the County.
While he hopes the economy recovers and eases the difficult decisions they face, he is also concerned
that many challenges will remain. Mr. Wurzer commented that there is an uncertain future as it relates to
VRS liabilities. Currently the County contributes between 9-15% of employee salaries to this system. He
said that there needs to be some cost-sharing with employees, as these costs will continue to grow. Mr.
Wurzer also stated that quasi-governmental agencies, i.e., Jaunt, JABA, JMRL, need the same scrutiny
that County government and schools are subject to. He added that capital expenditure investment cannot
be postponed forever, and need to be funded through additional savings and even tax increases. Mr.
Wurzer said the County does not need $5.9 million fire stations, 23,000 sq. ft. libraries or school additions
that result in excess capacity. He thanked the Board for their service during this very difficult time.
Ms. Connie Stevens, a resident of the Rio District, said she worked very hard for Mr. Thomas and
thanked the Board for making difficult choices in exercising fiscal restraint and responsibility. She stated
that we all need to tighten our belts in these tough economic times, as individuals, families, businesses,
schools, and government. Ms. Stevens said she moved here from Maryland five years ago to escape the
onerous tax burden there. She has two teenagers in the County school system and she thanked the
Board for looking out for them. She applauded the Supervisors for looking out for residents by lowering
taxes.
Mr. Jason Buyaki, a resident of Stony Point, thanked the Board for holding the line on taxes and
focusing on efficiency. He asked that individuals who can identify savings need to come forward and
present those savings. Mr. Buyaki said that we need to continue to focus on our needs, not our wants.
Mr. Gregory Quinn said that those who supported the President‟s Healthcare Bill are robbing
Peter to pay Paul, as it will drive up costs and cause those in the public system to be put on Medicaid,
which can‟t be sustained. There is going to be more demand for local taxpayers to fill the gap. He read a
statement saying that we do not have a right to housing, food, and healthcare provided by the federal
government; these are our personal responsibilities. The more we look to government to provide these
needs, the less there will be for education. Mr. Quinn said that everyone should work harder to provide for
their own needs so more money can go to education without taxes doubling over the next decade.
Mr. Doug Adamson said he is the parent of two teenagers and a taxpayer in the County. He said
that Santa Claus had lived in the School Board office here, but was chased out of town last fall and is now
squatting in a Congressman‟s office in Washington. He thanked the Board members who voted to hold
the line on taxes. For every spending need that comes before the Board you should ask “is it a need or is
it a want”. Employees should be challenged to come up with savings.
Mr. Ted Barger said he has two sons at Murray Elementary School. His comments relate to
restoration of principals at all elementary schools in the County. He stated that he believes leadership
during critical times is essential. Mr. Barger recounted the story of 82-year-old Lt. Col. Paul Gorman, who
served as a Battalion Commander in Vietnam with The Big Red One Division. He said that Lt. Col.
assumed the leadership after several other key officers were killed, and continued to direct close air
strikes until the Viet Cong force withdrew. Mr. Barger stated that Lt. Col. Gorman was later presented with
the Distinguished Service Cross, the second-highest military decoration in service. Combat cannot be
compared to school management, but during times of school transition, stress and budget cuts, effective,
cohesive leadership at the school level will be essential to maintain moral and standards which these fine
schools have obtained. He said that fractured leadership can be dangerous, and encouraged the Board to
restore full-time principals to each of the County schools.
Mr. Art Stow said that the four principals of the County‟s smallest schools are here this evening:
Nancy Teel, Principal at Scottsville; Alison Dwier-Selden, Principal at Yancey; Mark Green, Principal at
Murray; and himself, Principal at Red Hill. Mr. Stow stated that the School Board‟s funding request
includes a reduction and proposition to share principals at two schools, and the single leader would have
to split time between them. He said that the Superintendent has recommended the positions be restored,
and they are here tonight to support that request. Mr. Stow emphasized that they are not here tonight to
ask the Board to preserve their jobs, but to preserve the schools themselves. He noted that these smaller
schools often have fewer staff and embrace their roles of wearing many hats. Mr. Stow stated that there
are always unexpected issues that arise, and instruction or individual needs will suffer without proper
March 31, 2010 (Adjourned Meeting)
(Page 7)
coverage. He asked that the necessary funds be provided to allow every County school to have a full time
principal to meet the full time needs of all the students.
Mr. Burton Glass, an Ivy resident and father of three children in the school system, said that he
also represents a new group called Property Owners for Great Schools, which was formed this year and
now has about 300 members. He said that the group‟s creation was inspired by a School Board meeting
he had attended where organizations were vying for funding, but there was no discussion of taxes. Many
people are willing to raise taxes to defend education for great schools. Mr. Glass emphasized that the
County has a high capacity for taxes compared to other communities, and said that public education is
very close to a right. He stated that under funding education will ultimately be harmful to home sales and
unattractive to businesses that may relocate here. He stated he doesn‟t look forward to the debate where
you pit firefighters versus police, libraries versus schools, all worthy programs. He hopes that next year
the Board will enter the debate with a more open mind.
Mr. Peter Loach, on behalf of the Piedmont Housing Alliance, thanked the Board or their support
of affordable housing but expressing disappointment that the County is proposing to cut its support by
66%. He stated that the fiscal impact of this is serious, but PHA is willing to do its part during these
difficult times. Mr. Loach said that the organization‟s greater concern is whether the County is making a
permanent move away from its support of affordable housing, and particularly the proffer system. He
emphasized that there is a very strong correlation between housing and economic development, between
housing and jobs, and between housing and County revenues. Mr. Loach stated that over the last few
years, PHA helped 62 County homebuyers with over $1.58 million in down payment assistance loans that
leveraged $9.0 million from outside the region. He said that they also brought in a project in Crozet worth
$8.0 million, which is $4.5 million in construction and over 100 jobs, all funding from outside the County.
Mr. Loach said that PHA is working closely with 197 County residents to counsel them on default and
foreclosure issues, and has helped 27 residents over the last couple years avoid foreclosure, which saved
about $7.0 million in home values from entering the foreclosure market, which affects the neighborhood
and brings down property values and County revenues.
Mr. Keith Drake, Chairman of the Albemarle Truth in Taxation Alliance, said that real estate taxes
have doubled since the year 2000, not because of increased assessments but because the Board has
raised tax rate annually. Mr. Drake stated that in 2007, the Board raised the taxes 20%, in 2008, they
were raised 4.5%, and last year the taxes were kept flat, with the rate actually cut this year by a little more
than 3%. He thanked the Board for the break, but encouraged them to continue this momentum and
continue to look at the spending side of the equation. He concluded by stating that there is a growing
number of County taxpayers who are becoming increasingly aware of how their tax monies are being
spent. He thanked the Board members for their time, attention and service.
Ms. Valerie L‟Herrou, a resident of North Garden and Chairs the Albemarle County Housing
Committee – which was set up by the Board to give them guidance on housing issues, particularly
affordable housing issues. Ms. L‟Herrou stated that the Committee sent a memo to the Board for its
March 15th meeting, but she only heard from Mr. Rooker, which gives the Committee great concern. She
added that the Committee sort of feels as if its work is being ignored. Ms. L‟Herrou said that some of
those concerns include the proffer system, which goes to support affordable housing initiatives. By not
funding affordable housing initiatives they are letting down developers who have in good faith submitted
proffers to the County. She stated that this seems to be a penny wise, pound foolish move for the Board
because of the reasons Mr. Loach stated previously. This brings in a lot of outside money into the County.
Ms. L‟Herrou also said that not supporting housing assistance means that those people won‟t be able to
buy homes where they work, and will have to commute from neighboring counties. She stated that
Albemarle‟s tax rate is low when compared to other communities. She asked the Board to consider
changing the tax rate to be in line with other counties.
Ms. Mary Mays, a 5th grade teacher at Red Hill Elementary School and County taxpayer, said that
she and her husband just bought their first home in the County because they want their future children to
have the same quality of education as the children at Red Hill. She read statements from her students
expressing concerns about increased classed sizes, shared principals, and cuts for Destination
Imagination. She said that she does not understand why when over 100 people pleaded with the Board to
raise their taxes, the Board did not listen. Ms. Mays stated that the County is not treating its youngest
citizens as a priority, and doesn‟t understand how the Board ignored the pleas of parents, students, and
the community at large. She stated that they are asking the Board to keep our schools strong and find the
money to fund them.
Ms. Amy Vigilante said she is a parent of three young children, with two at Murray Elementary.
She said she is worried about her children‟s safety and security while at schools, especially since Murray
will be without a full-time principal. She said that the positions are being cut because the two Boards can‟t
agree or cooperate to get the needed funded. She stated their children‟s safety is more important than the
line that seems to be drawn in the sand. She asked that the Board find the funds for the principals.
Ms. Hannah Pickens, a 5th grader at Scottsville Elementary, said she is concerned about
Scottsville Elementary School sharing its principal with Yancey Elementary School. She said that she has
attended three different elementary schools, and one of her best teachers has been that principal, Mrs.
Teel. Miss Pickens stated that Mrs. Teel is a positive role model, knows every student in the school by
name, and will be less available to students if she must split her time. If Mrs. Teel went back and forth
between the two schools, when students get into trouble, to whom would they go to? Other teachers have
classes to teach and do not have time to discipline. Without Mrs. Teel, the students would have to take
their problems to someone else who might not be as understanding. She urged the Board to look at not
what would save more money, but what is best for the students.
March 31, 2010 (Adjourned Meeting)
(Page 8)
Ms. Clara Belle Wheeler thanked the Board for holding the tax rates stable for this year. Ms.
Wheeler said that in times of financial instability, everyone must differentiate between needs and wants.
She stated that personnel in Police and Sheriff‟s Departments are necessary for safety, and firefighters,
both paid and volunteer are needed to protect homes and business, schoolteachers are needed to
educate youth, but a 75,000 square foot brick building to house an indoor swimming pool and gymnasium
in a City park is not a necessity. She asked Mr. Dorrier how many Scottsville residents would drive to
McIntire Park to use the facility, as City records show that only 12 non-City residents swam in City pools
last year, and the Crowe Pool could be repaired for $238,000, which is a lot less than the $3.5 million cost
for the YMCA. She asked, please do not be coerced, bullied by legal threats to spend $3,030,000 to build
a YMCA. She asked the Board to think about wants vs. needs.
Ms. Peggy Scott, a resident of the Scottsville District, asked the Board to relinquish the money
necessary for the reoccurring costs of the County‟s schools to continue with the needs of the students as
well as the necessary principals. She stated that asking principals to cover two schools implies that the
children there are lesser valued. She said those principals are vital to the safety of our children; without
leadership and organization, chaos is what will happen. Students recognize principal-ships; they
recognize that when there‟s no leader, they can do certain things. They are not asking for undeserved or
unearned money. She asked why it always is “either” “or”, and it always seems to be more so for the
southern side of the County.
Mr. Steven Peters thanked the Board for holding the tax rate down. Mr. Peters stated that he is
tired of people complaining and whining when they don‟t get what they want from the Board. Mr. Peters
said that people shouldn‟t ask the Board of Supervisors to give them his money unless they are willing to
go door to door and look people in the eye and say it is for an important purpose.
Ms. Jane Kulow, said she has children in the County school system, is a taxpayer and President
of the Parent Council for Albemarle County Schools. Ms. Kulow said that she is strongly concerned about
ongoing, recurring funding for the schools and asked who would make that commitment. She stated that
last summer some Board members spoke out in support of the southern feeder schools and keeping them
open even with a higher per pupil cost. Ms. Kulow commented that when it comes to supporting those
educational costs, the support is not there. Ms. Kulow stated that at the Board‟s work session on the
School‟s budget, the IDEA Program was discussed, which promised funding at 40% of the cost, but is now
funded at just 14%. She said that the School‟s cost of implementing NCLB assessments is $200 per
student, higher than the funding allowed, and the VEA funding per student has gone from $5,200 a year to
$4,500 in the past three years. Ms. Kulow stated that teaching jobs, 82% of the school budget, cannot be
funded with stopgap, onetime chunks of money from the State, especially from the completely
unsustainable source as underfunding the teachers‟ own pension. She asked the Board to allocate the
funds the schools need.
Mr. George Beller, Vice-President of Piedmont Council of the Arts, said they exist to sustain the
arts as an essential part of the high quality of life in this area. He thanked the County for its financial
support and to stress how important that support is to fulfilling their mission. The funds they receive from
the County account for approximately 15% of their annual budget. Mr. Beller said that the PCA is the
designated arts agency for the City and County, and works to sustain the arts as part of the high quality of
life in the area. He requested that the Board make only a 5% cut in the PCA budget this year, as the arts
community here is a main attractor for visitors and residents. Mr. Beller stated that their online arts
calendar lists over 500 arts events per month and their website lists a directory of hundreds of local artists
with links to their own websites. He said that PCA coordinates workshops for artists and community
members, such as free seminars presented by the Virginia Bar Association on navigating the legal
processes for arts-related issues such as business formation, contracts, and copyright law. Mr. Beller
stated that their “Creative Conversations” series brings arts organizations and community groups together
to develop strategies for strengthening the arts in the region, attract new audiences, and make the area an
arts destination. He mentioned the PCA‟s Rising Star awards celebration, where teachers select high
school juniors and seniors for their outstanding talent and promise in the arts. Mr. Beller said that the Arts
Access project aims to make cultural activities more accessible to low-income citizens. Stressing cultural
tourism creates economic value, and when visitors spend a weekend here to attend cultural events, they
book rooms in our hotels, dine in our restaurants, and shop in our stores. He added that growing arts
environments also help attract good job candidates for employers like UVA. The PCA appreciates the
Board‟s support.
Mr. Salvatore Giordano said that he is a teacher at Albemarle High School. He said that Thomas
Hobbs wrote The Leviathan in the late 17th century, and talks about the state of nature before the
development of civil society, where left to their own devices, men would constantly be struggling for their
own individual needs, what he calls “the war of all against all”. Mr. Giordano stated that modern people
subscribe not to Hobbs‟ idea of an absolute ruler, but to John Locke‟s idea of The Social Contract, which
was very influential on Thomas Jefferson in writing the Declaration of Independence, and on the founding
fathers when writing the constitution. He explained that according to the terms of the social contract,
individuals give up some of their freedom in order to partake in the benefits of being a part of society. Mr.
Giordano said that those people who come forward with notions of only paying for what they use are
catering to the basics of instincts in all of us - what‟s in it for ME? Education is one of those demands that
citizens value as a society and everyone is responsible for it.
Ms. E.A. Jackson said that she is a teacher, coach, and resident in Albemarle County schools as
well as the parent of a future student. Ms. Jackson said that the County vision, mission, and values
statement is clearly posted on the County‟s website, and includes the following phrase: “the County‟s
educational system will be world class.” She asked how long this could possibly be sustained without the
recurring operational funds that the School Board is requesting. Ms. Jackson said that the Center for
March 31, 2010 (Adjourned Meeting)
(Page 9)
Survey Research conducted a survey in 2008, which indicate that the values of the majority of residents
and citizens are clearly stated and laid out, as 99% of residents who participated in the survey stated that
providing quality education for our school children was very important. She also stated that 99% of
residents who were asked if they were willing to put their money where their mouth is said they were
willing to commit those resources. Ms. Jackson said that there was a question as to whether residents
would be willing to spend tax money to back this up, and 95.3% of respondents said they wanted their tax
money to be spent on education. She asked that the Board provide to the School Board the recurring
operational funds they requested.
Mr. Harold Pillar said that he isn‟t much of a taxpayer, but would like for Hatton Ferry to be
included on tourism brochures. He said that Albemarle County can impose an occupational tax for people
outside the County, which would increase their revenue. Mr. Pillar stated that the School Board had a
budget that was fully funded, but came and asked for another $700,000. He said that he cannot earn any
more money to support world-class citizenship.
Ms. Linda McRaven thanked the Board for keeping the tax rate steady, noting that people pay
more because of increased property assessments. The real issue is the need to cut spending. She
emphasized that the Board needs to fund schools and the education process, as a top priority, but not
administrative offices. Ms. McRaven pointed out that one-half of the staffs in the Community
Development and Zoning Departments could be eliminated without anyone noticing. There is no need to
spend any additional money on the library or the YMCA, in a part in the middle of the City. She then asked
why the need for the television downstairs in the front of the building. The taxpayers want their money
spent wisely.
Mr. Wayne Martin said that he is a taxpayer and parent of kids in elementary school. Mr. Martin
said that he is profoundly saddened by the decision the Board is making, adding that it‟s just common
sense to have a principal in every school. It worries him that they seem to be building a retirement
community in this area. He asked Board members to think about how their children and grandchildren are
being educated.
At 7:51 p.m., the Board took a brief recess and then reconvened at 8:05 p.m.
Mr. John Dean, a County resident, expressed thanks to the schools for providing such a good
education for he and his wife‟s four kids. Mr. Dean said that his daughter, Sarah went to Murray High
School, which taught her the concept of personal responsibility. He stated that this Board is the picture of
fiscal irresponsibility because they are unwilling to provide the revenues the community needs. He stated
this is a funding crisis, not a budget crisis. Mr. Dean said that the Board should take personal
responsibility for laying off teachers and County workers.
Ms. Mary Margaret Frank said that she is a tax professor at Darden School of Business and a
former tax consultant. Ms. Frank stated that she has never in her life asked for a tax increase, as she
believes in efficient use of funds, but she disagrees with the Board‟s choice about the tax rate. She asked
the Board tonight to begin thinking about 2012, as the County will then lose state funding as well as
federal funding for schools that are finally showing improvement. Ms. Frank said that if the Supervisors
think there are other places to be cut, they should get out of their chairs and go to the schools and find the
fluff. She asked if they really thought that having four schools share two principals is a long term solution
or a special program. She added that not raising tax rates is a short-term solution, and assuming property
values will recover enough is not a solution. She asked the Board to begin now to think outside the „cut
education‟ box.” Ms. Frank stated that she has offered suggestions as to how to help those in the
community who are struggling. She asked the Board to change their mission statement and their 2007-
2010 Strategic Plan, as it says their vision is for the County‟s educational system to be world class, and
this is obviously not your priority.
Ms. Catherine Von Storch said that she is a 20-year County resident and the parent of a 3rd grader
at Red Hill School. She previously sent Board members a letter indicating that she and her husband
support paying more in taxes to fully fund the education budget. She stated even that level of funding for
County schools is below the ideal to which the community aspires. It should not set the new standard; it is
already less than zero. Ms. Von Storch stated that the Board should not lower the tax rate and should fully
fund the school budget, emphasizing that the four most rural schools are going to lose their most
consistent leadership, their principals. Principals are involved in every aspect of the school‟s operations
and serves as the school‟s leader. The principal‟s most important job is to advocate for what is best for
the children in the school which means knowing each and every student, the families and the
communities. She added that the consistent face of that leader is critical to ensuring the success of the
school, its students, and its teachers. Effective schools, excellent teaching, successful test scores,
passionate learners, in a safe, happy environment require that kind of day-to-day consistent leadership.
She asked the Board to support the County public schools and to fully fund the education budget shortfall.
The Chair called the following names whom were no longer present: Gilleane Stalfiet and Ted
Greene.
Ms. Audrey Welborn thanked the Board for holding the tax rate down. She and her husband have
lived in the County for 38 years in the same house. They have seen their tax rate skyrocket over the last
10 years, and in one four-year period their taxes increased 52%. She added that Albemarle County is an
expensive place to live, and in other places there are restrictions about raising taxes no more than 2% per
year. Ms. Welborn stated that her family has had to make major cutbacks, and there remains uncertainty
about what future government cuts at all levels there will be. She thanked the Board for all they have
done for the families in the County.
March 31, 2010 (Adjourned Meeting)
(Page 10)
Mr. Stotts Rerio thanked the Board for keeping the Scottsville Library and community center open.
He recently retired and is working part time. He needs a computer to use because he cannot get high-
speed internet where he lives. Therefore, the Library in Scottsville is important to him because it allows
him to work; that is not a want, but a need. He is also concerned about the budget for future years. He
also asked why line item expenses over the years have not been displayed. It is only after he looks at
expenses does he look at his budget.
Mr. Hal Hankins said that he teaches government at Albemarle County High School. He is a
County homeowner, taxpayer, teacher and pastor. He asked the Board for assistance in helping to teach
his students, who take his nonpartisan class their senior year. He wants the students to leave believing
that government works, believing that what they say makes a difference, and believing that their vote
counts. Mr. Hankins stated that he listened from his home as voter after voter, parents, students,
business owners, and teachers come and ask the Board to raise their taxes. He said that the Board‟s
answer to the last public hearing was that they don‟t listen to the people. Mr. Hankins stated that he
hopes the Board members care about more than the next election. Mr. Hankins stated the Board does
not have to raise taxes by setting a higher tax rate, but it should at least tell the people that you heard
them.
Mr. Dave Frey stated that he and his family moved his business here from New York City because
of the schools. He said that he is a product of the public school system, and it just seems odd to cut the
principals. Mr. Frey stated that during the I-64 shooting incident, the principal at his children‟s school was
awesome, locking the schools down, calling and emailing parents, etc. He added that he also thinks that
good schools are good for the community. Where he previously lived, they had a lot of bad schools and
that equaled crime, drugs, shooting; it was bad, bad for everything. There seems to be a lot of arguments
about what government should provide. He added that the County has awesome roads. He also doesn‟t
have a problem with a having a per child cost for educating his children. He does not understand why the
Board would even consider cutting the principals. Mr. Frey concluded by stating that he appreciates the
work the Board is doing.
Ms. Blair Davis said that she teaches in the County where her parents moved specifically for the
school system. She expressed serious disappointment over the cuts made to schools, stating her
concern that students will not have the support needed to learn successfully and learn with excellence.
Ms. Davis stated that she is here to request that the Board finds a way to support the schools in order to
keep principals and teachers, especially in the small schools. She said that the lack of funding has
already created downsizing in classroom teachers, the same people who will be required to step in for the
principal. Principals provide safety, equity, discipline and positive promotion of quality instruction. The
principals are leaders of the schools and set the precedence for excellence. She asked if Board members
would put their child into a school with a part-time principal. Albemarle County is a leader in education and
a strong motivator for people to move to the County. With the cuts that have already been made and the
cuts in the principals, she does not think that will remain the case. She asked that the Board fund the
schools.
Mr. Remy Indebetouw said he is a parent and an U.Va. faculty member. Mr. Indebetouw said that
not educating our children is pretty poor parenting, and while getting the best education for his children
might be what he wants, everyone in the room needs that to happen in order to build a stronger country
and invest in the future. He does not think the Board would ask our country to weather a recession with a
half-time president; or ask a company to restructure with a half-time CEO. By that logic, they could
eliminate one-half of the Board members and the county would be just fine. He asked the Board to find
the money to preserve the leadership.
Mr. Steve Gissendanner said he is a teacher in the County school system. He said that is here to
talk about honesty. This Board has not been honest with this budget; there is money pulled off the top
before the 60/40 split that‟s never been clearly communicated. He added that this year the Board pulled
even more money out of the formula and redirected that to the government so that now the 60/40 split has
been reduced even further. He asked that the Board be honest with the public about how it is really
funding the schools as compared to local government. Mr. Gissendaner emphasized that his classroom
budget has stayed the same for the last seven years, with $300 in supplies for 50 kids in a science class
all year, and many years it gets taken back if it is not spent by Christmas. He stated that he does not see
money being thrown around. He said that the School Board has had an independent audit of their
efficiency, which went line by line, and they are doing a pretty good job finding savings. The School
Division continuous looks for savings.
There being no further public comments, the public hearing was closed.
Ms. Mallek thanked everyone for coming tonight and sharing their ideas. The Board members
have listened carefully and made notes, and will continue with this debate going forward.
Mr. Boyd noted that he has heard at this meeting that the Board members did not listen to
comments from audience members at their last public hearing. He emphasized that there was an $8.0
million shortfall in the School budget at that time, and that has shrunk to $400,000, which he personally felt
was a reasonable number given the economic times we‟re in. Mr. Boyd said that it would never have been
his decision to eliminate principals in the schools and he thinks that is the wrong thing to do, but that is a
School Board decision. He stated that that‟s not something that this Board did, nor did they ask them to
do it. Mr. Boyd mentioned that the Board funded 99.7% of what was requested of them at the time, but
that number has changed now because the School Board has decided to put the principals back in, but
they are going to have to find that within their own budget to do it. He noted that the School Board
Chairman has now asked the Board for one-time money, because they don‟t want to spend the one-time
March 31, 2010 (Adjourned Meeting)
(Page 11)
money that the State is going to give them. The Board understands that ongoing costs have to be funded
with sustainable funds, but the Board also understands that every year things like what happened this year
can happen. If the State had not gone back and made the adjustments it did, the County would be facing
an $8.0 million shortfall in the School Board budget. He thinks this Board would then have had to step up
and do something. He does not think that this Board is always the ones who are on the end of the chain
and it falls on this Board to put that tax burden on the property owners in this County. He added that the
Board is not opposed to education, nor are they unsupportive of a world-class education, but certain times
dictate you have to change. Mr. Boyd stated that it‟s being done with businesses and personal lives, and
you can‟t just increase income by going out and taking some from your neighbor. He thinks that people
need to get use to living on less. He believes a quality education can be provided to the children in the
community by making wise and well-implemented cuts in spending. He does not think a $400,000 or a
$700,000 shortfall will be a draconian cut in a $145.0 million budget.
Mr. Snow added that the $8.0 million was covered, along with a $3.4 million surplus of one-time
money. He stated that the principals could be funded out of that one-time money, until it is clear what next
year will bring.
Mr. Dorrier commented that the School Board has made the decision to put the principals back
into their budget.
Mr. Rooker said that they did, but it puts their budget out of balance by about $700,000.
Mr. Dorrier said he thinks the Board should do whatever it needs to do to make sure the principals
are full-time; you can‟t run two ships with one captain.
Mr. Snow emphasized that that‟s a School Board decision.
Mr. Rooker commented, when Mr. Dorrier says we need to do what we have to do to do these
things, sometimes that means raising revenue, and he has not seen him willing to do that since he has
been on the Board.
Mr. Dorrier said that the Board has a reserve fund that has some money in it.
Mr. Rooker responded that the County has a $293.0 million budget, but has a reserve that is far
less than 1% of that. If you have a one-half-percent swing in the revenue projections, you‟re under water.
That is pretty tight.
Mr. Rooker said that he hadn‟t planned on making comments tonight, but the budget the Board is
getting ready to adopt means there is no capital improvements plan. For the next five years, they have no
new investment in capital in the community; in fact, the plan assumes that in four or five years out, the
County is borrowing money to pay debt. In his opinion that is incredibly imprudent. He added that the
schools have been told by this Board not to look to one-time money to build an operating budget with
continuing expenses, and this year when they followed that script they are being told the opposite. Mr.
Rooker stated that next year, the School budget will be cut a minimum of $2.5 million by the State, and the
following year the adjustments in the composite index will further reduce it by that amount. He said they
are looking at is a cliff in funding for schools from the state. He asked if the Board is really willing to step
up and raise the revenues necessary to continue to fund schools at a reasonable level at the same time
they are being asked to raise money for capital. There are at least 50 less police officers than the
County‟s policy calls for. Mr. Rooker stated that if there is no investment in education and capital projects,
the County better get used to living on less because it is going to be less of a community and less
desirable. He said that a number of people came forward and said they moved their businesses here
because of the quality of education and other services. Mr. Rooker stated that the financially successful
communities in this state are the ones that have made an investment in those areas, and they have
substantially higher tax rates.
Mr. Rooker said that Northern Virginia is cranking out two-thirds of the economic growth in this
state, and they make an investment back in their communities, schools, libraries, etc., and they don‟t
operate on a 53-cent tax rate that Albemarle operates on here, which is the net rate when you account for
land use. He stated that many people here who commented that they want to keep taxes low are on land
use and actually pay about 10% of the taxes that everybody else pays on the same value. He thinks that
the Board is making a mistake, especially by not addressing at least a minimum investment in some of
these areas to maintain a reasonable level of services over the next couple of years.
Ms. Mallek stated that the Board has heard many different voices and is trying hard to work
together to come up with a solution that it can go forward with. She asked the community to stay engaged
with the Board and keep their ideas coming.
Mr. Boyd commented that he disagrees with Mr. Rooker‟s contention that the County will have to
borrow to pay debt. He thought they were borrowing to do maintenance.
Mr. Rooker replied that one way or another you are going to be borrowing to maintain the existing
capital, either in terms of borrowing to pay debt, or borrowing to pay maintenance.
Mr. Snow emphasized that there is no crystal ball that shows what will happen in four or five
years.
March 31, 2010 (Adjourned Meeting)
(Page 12)
Mr. Rooker responded that the Board develops a five-year business plan that is based upon some
assumptions, and based on those, the things he said about borrowing for debt are true. He added that he
is afraid that what the Board is doing now is just going to set the County up for having either dramatic
decreases in the quality of education and other services, or substantially higher taxes in order to deal with
the cliff in education funding that appears to be coming, and the fact that the Board has no money in its
budget for capital. He thinks it is imprudent.
There were no further comments.
__________________
Agenda Item No. 7. From the Board: Matters Not Listed on the Agenda.
Ms. Mallek asked Board members to read over their emails and review the message from VML
regarding the State budget so they can decide whether they want to send back a response.
Mr. Rooker replied that he read it and he supports it.
__________________
Agenda Item No. 8. Adjourn.
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 8:43 p.m.
________________________________________
Chairman
Approved by
Board
Date: 03/02/2011
Initials: EWJ