HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP202000049 Review Comments Final Site Plan and Comps. 2020-08-17Phone 434-296-5832
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4579
Memorandum
To: Scott Collins (cs o!L@collins-en ing eering com)
From: Paty Satemye, Senior Planner
Division: Planning
Date: August17,2020
Subject: SDP 202000049 Mill Creek Industrial Park — Lot I I — Final Site Development Plan
Fax 434-9724126
The County of Albemarle Planning Division will recommend approval of the plan referenced above once the following
comments have been satisfactorily addressed (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time.
Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.): [Each comment is preceded by
the applicable reference, which is to the Subdivision/Zoning Ordinances unless otherwise specified.]
Initial Site Plan Comments (from approval letter dated 3/16/16):
1. [32.5.2(a)] The owner information provided does not match that shown in County real estate records, verify that
accurate owner information is provided.
Final: Comment not vet addressed. Address comment.
2. [32.5.2(a)] It appears that the proposed parking does not meet the required parking setback from Stoney Ridge Road,
please show the building and parking setback lines, and revise the layout to meet this requirement (or apply for a
special exception).
Final: Comment not vet addressed. Address comment.
3. [32.5.2(a)] Provide the zoning and present use of abutting parcels.
Final: Comment not vet fully addressed. Provide the present use of abutting Parcels.
4. [32.5.2(b)] Provide the number of stories in the proposed building.
Final: Comment not yet addressed. Address comment.
5. [32.5.2(b)] Clarify if the "offices" proposed are in support of the industrial use. Industrial Offices serving this use are
allowed by -right (see definition), but Independent offices are not.
IndustrialOffrces: Offices that are owned and operated by the same business entity engaged in a
Laboratories/Research and DevelopmendExperimental Testing, Manufacturing/Processing/
Assembly/Fabrication/Recycling, or a Storage/Warehousing/DishibutiomTransportation use located in Albemarle
County or the City of Charlottesville, where the offices provide services to the industrial use but which need not be
on the same site as the industrial use. For the purposes of this definition, "Offices that are owned and operated by
the same business entity" does not mean offices that are part of an entity that is in an affiliated business entity
relationship or a parent -subsidiary relationship with the entity engaged in the industrial use.
approved use under the current zoning or a Special Use Permit (SP) or Zoning Map Amendment (ZMA) will be
required. If a new SP or ZMA Amendment is required a new initial site plan, for the use allowed by the SP or ZMA
Amendment must be submitted and approved prior to final site plan submittal. If the "offices" proposed in Phase I are
"industrial offices" (as defined in 3.1) serving an industrial use then contact the Dlanning review coordinator for further
information
Page 1 of 4
6. [32.5.2(b)] Clarify if any outdoor storage area is proposed. The concept plan discussed at the pre -application meeting
included outdoor storage area, but the submitted plan does not. If any outdoor storage area is proposed, see section
5.1.52 for requirements.
Final: Comment no longer required. No outdoor storage is shown in the site plan.
7. [32.5.2(d)] Show proposed grading on the plan.
Final: Comment addressed.
8. [32.5.2(e)] Show the existing landscape features (as described in 32.7.9.4) on the existing conditions sheet.
Final: Comment not vet addressed. Revise the label for the existing tree area to specifv if it is composed of
"evergreens". "deciduous", or a "mix of evergreens and deciduous".
9. [32.5.2(i)] Provide the state route number for Stoney Ridge Road and the pavement widths of both adjacent roads.
Final: Comment addressed.
10. 132.5.2(], k)] Verify that all lines and all necessary easements for proposed water, sewer and drainage facilities have
been shown on the plan.
Final: Comment not vet fully addressed. Address the following:
a) Include the deed book and page number in the label for the "Existing Sanitary Sewer Service Lateral" at the
southeast comer of the parcel.
b) Confirm that the "Proposed 8" PVC Sanitary Sewer Main" labeled on the adjoining lot (T.M. 76M1-12) is
proposed with this site plan.
c) If it is, ensure it is represented as a proposed line and that all needed easements (including temporary construction
easements) proposed with this site plan.
d) If any easements are proposed with this site plan the easement plat and all required deeds must be recorded prior to
the final site plan approval.
11. 132.5.2(1)] Provide the location of any other existing or proposed utilities and utility easements including telephone,
cable, electric and gas.
Final: Comment not vet fully addressed. Address the following:
a) Either confirm in your comment response letter that there are no existing gas or power lines within the existing gas
and power easements or provide the location of those existing lines.
b) Confirm that the existing gas and power easement are within the same 15' wide easement areas. The labels for
these two easements are in identical locations.
c) Existing telephone pedestals are shown near the guardrail along Five Springs Road, and at the southwest comer of
the lot along Stoney Ridge Road, but no telephone lines are shown. Provide the location of any existing telephone
lines. Show any existing telephone easements along Stoney Ridge Road.
12. [32.5.2(1)] Show the distance to the centerline of the nearest existing street intersection from the proposed ingress and
egress.
Final: Comment addressed.
13. [32.5.2(n)] Dimension the retaining walls.
Final: Comment not vet addressed. Show the safety railings on the portions of the retaining walls that will require
them.
14. [32.5.2(n)] Dimension the dumpster pad.
Final: Comment not vet fully addressed. Dimension height of the dumpster enclosure gate
15. [32.5.2(p)] Provide a landscape plan that meets all requirements of section 32.7.9 with the Final Site Plan. Be aware
that the proposed utilities along Stoney Ridge Road may make it difficult to meet the street tree requirement.
FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. Address the following:
a) Only 4 large shade trees are provided along the street frontage, but 6 are listed in the calculations as being
provided. Yoshino Chem tree are not large shade trees and therefore do not meet that requirement. Provide the
required number of large shade trees along the street frontage.
b) One of the labels for the sweetspire shrubs does not appear to have the correct quantity listed. It states 7. but 11
c)
Page 2 of 4
d) The Conservation Plan Checklist must be filled out, signed by the owner, and dated prior to final site plan
approval.
e) Provide a limit of clearing and grading lines in Grading & Utilities Plan and Landscape Plan sheets.
f) Clarify how there is 14,985 SF of pavement and only 5,855 SF of that is "circulation". When generating the SF
utilized in the landscaping calculation both parking and circulation/travel area must be included. Please also note
that the additional loading spaces count toward that area as well. Revise the notes on the cover sheet and the
landscape calculations accordingly.
g) Show the free standing light locations in the landscape plan and ensure there are no conflicts. The light fixture on
the southern side of the loading dock area appears to be conflicting with an evergreen tree.
16. 132.5.2(p) & 32.7.9.71 Provide information demonstrating how the dumpster will be screened.
Final: Comment addressed.
17. [Comment] If any off -site easements are required, they must be approved and recorded prior to Site Plan approval.
Since no proposed grading has been provided, it is unknown if any off -site easements are necessary.
Final: Comment not vet fully addressed. If any off -site easements are required, they must be approved and recorded
prior to Site Plan approval. There appears to be a "Proposed 8" PVC Sanitary Sewer Main" just inside of the T.M.
76M1-12 adjoining parcel which would require work to be performed on that within that parcel.
18. [Comment] A retaining wall is shown on the existing conditions sheet, but is labeled "New Retaining Wall", clarify if
this wall is new or existing.
Final: Comment addressed.
Additional comments for Final Site Plan:
19. [Comment] Add SDP number of SDP2020-49 to cover sheet.
20. 132.6.11 Remove Phase II from the final site plan. As mentioned in my email on 6/18/2020, the "Future
Warehouse/Storage Building" would not be in accordance with the approved initial site plan. The building footprint
shown for Phase II goes beyond that which was approved with the initial site plan SDP2016-8 and therefore cannot be
approved with this final site plan. In order to expand the building footprint to that extent a new initial site plan must be
submitted and approved.
21. [32.5.2(b)] Provide the proposed height of the building. Only the maximum is listed.
22. 132.5.2(n) & 32.6.2(k) & 4.171 Address the following in reference to the manufacturer's cut sheets and the
Luminaire Legend and Schedule:
a) Clarify what the "HSS" option for the S311 luminaire represents.
b) Revise the color temperature of the WP luminaire to be a "warm white" between 2000 and 3000.
c) Only one free standing light is shown in the schedule, but the manufacturer's cut sheet appears to have two options
selected under 1) "Distribution", 2) "Luminaire EPA Chart" and 3) "Light Output". Also, one of the options
shown selected in the "Luminaire EPA Chart" appears to be double mounted fixtures, mounted at 180 degrees
from each other, but only single luminaires are shown on the photometric plan. Revise this information to be what
is proposed.
d) The free standing light appears to have tilting options (see "Mounting" section of description). These lights can
not be tilted. Add a note specifying this on the photometric plan. The lights must shine directly down in order to
be "full cut-off' fixtures which are required for lights over 3,000 lumens.
e) Show the free standing light locations in the landscape plan and ensure there are no conflicts. The light fixture on
the southern side of the loading dock area appears to be conflicting with an evergreen tree.
23. [32.5.2(d)] The slopes on this site are "Managed" Steep Slopes and not "Critical Slopes". Revise information on
coversheet to specify Steep Slopes.
Page 3 of 4
24. 132.6.1(e)(6) & 32.6.10)] Address the following:
a) Dimension the depths of the two loading spaces provided at the south of the proposed building.
b) It appears that the depth of the handicapped parking space, by the entrance, is not sufficient depth. Ensure that the
curve of the entrance does not decrease the depth of the space below the minimum depth.
c) Label the 2' area at the front of the 16' parking spaces as "2' clear space"
d) Ensure the 2' area at the front of 16' parking space that has the drainage inlet in front of it is appropriately labeled
as well. Although it may not be a grassy area it is still part of the required 2' of clear area in front of the parking
space.
25. [32.5.2(b)] Address the following:
a) The parking calculation will be evaluated once a use allowed in the zone is proposed and the parking calculation
for that use is provided.
b) Provide a "total" for the amount of impervious area on the site.
26. [Comment] Revise retaining wall height note on cover sheet to state the actual maximum retaining wall height. The
not currently lists both 0 to 8' "anticipated" but also states "shall not exceed 10"'.
27. [Comment] This site plan cannot be approved until all reviewers grant their approval. E911 and RWSA have no
objection. See the attached comments from all of the other reviewers.
Staff has provided references to provisions of Chapter 18 of the Code of the County of Albemarle. The Code is kept up to
date by the County Attorney's office. The Code may found on the County Attorney's website which may be found under
"Departments and Services" at Albemarle.org.
In accord with the provisions of Section 32.4.3.5 of Chapter 18 of the Code if the developer fails to submit a revised final
site plan to address all of the requirements within six (6) months after the date of this letter the application shall be deemed
to have been voluntarily withdrawn by the developer.
Please contact Paty Saternye in the Planning Division by using psatemve(a),albemarle.org or 434-296-5832 ext. 3250 for
further information.
Page 4 of 4
SDP202000049 - Mill Creek Industrial Lot 11— Final
Engineering comments (David James):
1. Submit a VSMP application & plan if you haven't already. Disturbance over 10,000sf.117-3021
2. It appears that the parcel boundary line appears different than what's shown in County GIS, and
will need to confirm with real estate if property line shown is accurate.
3. Show areas of off -site disturbance in an easement (i.e. entrance improvements). Signed letter of
permission from an offsite owner is sufficient, but only for the purposes of this review, or record
a plat.
4. Submit design plans & comps for walls over 4' high prior to FSP approval.
5. Cover —
a. Sign & date seal.
b. The stated sheet layout of 1" = 30' do not appear to be accurate.
6. Sheet 3 —
a. Remove curb before CG-12 and show access apron.
b. Show safety railing for walls over 30" high.
7. Sheet 4 — Provide reverse slope bench and/or surface water diversion for the graded slopes. 118-
30.7.5}
PROPOSED WALL
MAX. HEIGHT=io'
458.50TC
SS.00EP
75&58TC
P�463TW
4598W
24"LET 4.50
1.50 '
) STONE LINED TRAPReQAL
NNEL OUTFALL (16" WIDE Af—' 48
M, 6'DEEP, 2:1 SIDE SLOPES) �//-�
Nto
tr
b
tr
6
8. Sheet 5 —
a. Show ground cover (not grass) for disturbed slopes over 3:1 grade.
b. Remove proposed trees and place trees outside of public drainage easements.
9. Sheet 8—Storm STR 4 to 2 the line is 12" dia. and will need an additional MH access (over 50'
length) [VDOT DM 9.3.6, table 9.31, or use a 15" dia.
Stephen C. Brich. P.E.
Qmmus inner
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1401 East Broad Street
Richmond, Virginia 23219
July 27,2020
Patricia Satemye
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Re: SDP-2020-00049 — Mill Creek Industrial Park Lot 11
Dear Ms. Satemye:
(804) 786.2701
Fax: (804)7862940
The Department of Transportation, Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use
Section, has reviewed the above referenced Mill Creek Industrial Park Lot 11, as submitted by
Collins Engineering, dated June 8, 2020 and note the following items:
1. The vicinity map does not appear to be for this project.
2. Please label the right of way on each plan sheet.
3. Please show how storm water will flow from entrance area into storm structures. Spot
elevations and directional arrows will suffice.
4. Mill and Overlay will be 25' from either edge of cut in pavement, per WP-2 detail and
Land Use Permit descriptions for open -cut pavement restoration requirements.
htto://www.vireiniadot.orp/business/resources/land use revs/newPerrnitPackaces/LUP-
OC.odf
5. Proposed entrance should align with existing entrance across SR 1000. Show the entrance
location in conformance with (appendix F., pg. F-126) 50'ft., of spacing from adjacent
entrances and appropriate offset or alignment with entrances on the opposite side of the
street is required.
6. The geometry of the proposed entrance on Stoney Ridge Road (Route 1000) needs to meet
the design vehicle standards. Based on the proposed industrial manufacturing use, trucks
will be accessing the property. "Entrance Design Details" can be found in Appendix F of
the Road Design Manual.
7. A plan and profile should be provided to ensure there is adequate sight distance at the
proposed entrance.
8. The distance from the proposed entrance to the nearest commercial entrance/street
connection in each direction needs to be shown on the plan. Please note that this includes
any connection that serves more than 5 single family residences.
VirginiaDOT.org
WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING
9. The proposed entrance pavement should match the existing pavement on Stoney Ridge
Road and should tie-in to the existing Stoney Ridge Road pavement at a minimum of V
from the edge of pavement.
10. Please utilize entrance detail on page F-108 for entrance design to roads without curbing.
11. Please note that the final site plan must show conformance with the VDOT Road Design
Manual Appendices B (1) and F, as well as any other applicable standards, regulations, or
other requirements.
A VDOT Land Use Permit will be required prior to any work within the right of way. The
owner/developer must contact the Charlottesville Residency land Use Section at (434) 422-9399
for information pertaining to this process.
If you have further questions please contact Max Greene at (434) 422-9894.
Sincerely,
Adam J. Moore, P.E.
Area Land Use Engineer
Charlottesville Residency
Review Comments for SDP202000049 Final Site Development Plan
Project Name Mill Creek Industrial Lot 11 - Final - Digital
Date Completed: Monday, July 06, 2020 Department/DivisionlAgency: Review Status:
Reviewer: Michael Dellinger
CDD Inspections Requested Changes
Add the following note to the general notes page:
Accessible parking spaces, access isles, and accessible route shall be installed in accordance with ICC ANSI A117.1-09.
Add the following note to the general notes page:
ALL water lines, sewer lines, and fire lines from the main to the structure MUST have a visual inspection performed by the
building department.
Add the following note to the general notes page:
Where the flood level rims of plumbing fixtures are below the elevation of the manhole cover of the next upstream manhole in the
public sewer. the fixtures shall be protected by a backwater valve installed in the building drain, branch of the building drain or
horizontal branch serving such fixtures. Plumbing fixtures having flood level rims above the elevation of the manhole cover of the
next upstream manhole in the public sewer shall not discharge through a backwater valve.
Add the following to the general notes page:
All roof drains shall discharge in a manner not to cause a public nuisance and not over sidewalks.
Page: 1 County of Albemarle Printed On: 0810412020
Review Comments for
Project Name: IMill Creek Industrial Lot 11 - Final - Digital
Date Completed: I Wednesday, July 29, 2020
Reviewer: Shawn Maddox
SDP2O2OOOO49 Final Site Development Plan
Department/Division/Agency: Review Status:
Fire Rescue . Requested Changes
1. Please add a hydrant near the entrance to this structure as the spacing on that street currently exceeds the 500' spacing
requirement. If the building is going to be sprinklered show the FDC and it must be located within 100' of the hydrant.
2. Please add a note that a knox box is required and that the location can be coordinated with with the fire marshal's office.
3. Please provide the ISO needed fire flow and the available fire flow from a recent ACSA fire flow test.
Page: 1� Countyof Albemarle Printed On: 08/04/ 0020
Review Comments for SDP202000049 Final Site Development Plan
Project Name I Mill Creek Industrial Lot 11 - Final - Digital
Date Completed: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 Department/Division/Agency: Review Status:
Reviewer Richard Nelson ACSA v Requested Changes
Page: Fl----] Countyof Albemarle Printed On: 08/04/ 0020
/ P
/ T.M. 76M1-2o
/ LOT ao
3 I MCV LLC
D.B.3470-356
PAVED ZONING:
PUD
LOCAD.B.a8yPLAT /
) EXISTING WATER METERS P
! TION OF WATER LINE l
( 1 EXISTEASEMENT (D.B. 1342-246) /
1 IN FIRE _ /
EXISTING PROPERTY
\ � ; HYDRANT ALVE BOUNDARY
DRAINAGE EASEMENT
�4/ s (D.B.1848-278)
CONCRETE DITCH-
1 INV OUT=462.49 I C+ /
15' GAS LINE EASEMENT
\\ EXISTING AR�A
\� I (D.B. 1120-214)
DIP WATERLINE 457.1TC
456:67EP
v
Ep I
458.83TC 460TW
\ 455.58TC / 33EP .v
455.25EP 458
� � 4598W \�
asssorc _. Il T.M.76Ma-21
EXISTING DRAINAGE EASEM NT = 458.00EP 458.83TG PARCEL 11
h ! (D B fi342-241 & D.B. iio2�22) �� / ` 4�58.33�P 1.1 ��• APS WAREHOUSE, LLC
d a6arw - yI 1p D.B.1999-352
PROPOSED DI w � '� 458.50TC 464TW N. D.B. aao2-724 THRU 729 PLAT
TOP=454.42 rti 458.00EP V 'I� ` ZONING: PUD
INV IN=450.42
L INV OUT=447.42
454.58TC 459.83TC
EXISTING ACSA 8" DIP WATERLINE 5% EXISTING CATCH BASIN
454.25EP 459.33EP
G 1 PROPOSED 15" 2 TOP= 475 08
ACSA GENERAL WATER & SEWER CONDITIONS
1. WORK SHALL BE SUBJECT TO INSPECTION BY ALBEMARLE COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY (ACSA) INSPECTORS.
THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR NOTIFYING THE PROPER ACSA OFFICIALS AT THE START OF THE
WORK.
2. THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES ACROSS THE LINE OF THE PROPOSED WORK ARE NOT NECESSARILY
SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND WHERE SHOWN ARE ONLY APPROXIMATELY CORRECT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL,
ON HIS OWN INITIATIVE, LOCATE ALL UNDERGROUND LINES AND STRUCTURES, AS NECESSARY.
3. ALL MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF THE GENERAL WATER
AND SEWER CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS, AS ADOPTED BY THE ACSA.
4. DATUM FOR ALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN IN NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY.
S. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR NOTIFYING MISS UTILITY (1-800-552-7002).
6. ALL WATER AND SEWER PIPES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF THREE (3) FEET OF COVER MEASURED FROM THE
TOP OF PIPE, OVER THE CENTERLINE OF PIPE. THIS INCLUDES ALL FIRE HYDRANT LINES, SERVICE LATERALS AND
WATER LINES, ETC.
7. ALL WATER AND SEWER APPURTENANCES ARE TO BE LOCATED OUTSIDE OF ROADSIDE DITCHES.
8. VALVES ON DEADEND LINES SHALL BE RODDED TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE RESTRAINT FOR THE VALVE DURING A
FUTURE EXTENSION OF THE LINE.
9. TREES ARE NOT PERMITTED IN THE ACSA EASEMENT.
1o. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO COMPLY WITH THE NO -LEAD REGULATION REGARDING BRASS
FITTINGS EFFECTIVE JANUARY 4, 2014 (SENATE BILL 3874 WHICH AMENDS THE SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT).
1 HOPE STORM NV OU =473.06
SEWER PIPE B 1 ;
- /EXISTING CATCH 'SIN
EX TOP= 48.85 -
EXINVIN= 45.g-: PROPOSED WALL
! PROPOSED INV IN 445.67 a MAX. HEIGHT=1o'-
1 EX INV OUT 445 5 454.42TC454.09EP a I S N
24"RCP ! ��
TIE-IN TO EXISTING STORM SEWER PROPOSED 12" 456.00TC 458.50TC UTILITY NOTES:
1
454.33TW HDPE YARD 455.50EP 458.130EP
S ,� nm ' 452.00BW DRAIN LINE `S� a 1 ` � 1. A MINIMUM OF 1' OF VERTICAL SEPARATION FROM STORM SEWER &WATER AND
v T EL. 1, ; SEWER LINES MUST BE PROVIDED.
j w EX-1 455.00TC 456.58TC _ 41�2 ED. 1 , 2. A MINIMUM 3.5' OF COVER MUST BE MAINTAINED OVER W/L AND S/L.
C)L n 454.67EP 456.08EP 59 W 3. A MINIMUM OF 1.5' OF VERTICAL SEPARATION FROM WATER AND SEWER LINES
141 ai PROPOSED WALL MUST BE PROVIDED.
MAX. HEIGHT-2.33' PROPOSED LET 4. ALL PROPOSED WATER METERS SHALL BE ENCOMPASSED WITHIN AN ACSA
1" copper p YARD INLET - 4
� Q TOP=455.50 .! � EASEMENT & SHALL BE DEDICATED FOR PUBLIC USE.
O INV OUT=451.50 / 1 S. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING ALL EXISTING ELEVATIONS OF
ROADWAY, CURB & GUTTER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTING THE EXTENSION OF THE
15' VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND
Z v 454.80TC ; POWER COMPANY EASEMENT
i� m 454.30EP 6 PROPOSED STONE LINED TRAPIZOIDAL l ' I , (D.B.1633-700) STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER, WATER LINE AND PAVED ACCESSES.
J psi IP CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES 50 THAT THE
4 CHANNEL OUTFALL (16" WIDE AT , '1 AVED 1 ELEVATIONS OF THE TIE-IN CONNECTIONS CAN BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY.
456.00EP BOTTOM, 6" DEEP, 2:2 SIDE SLOPES) i 1 1 ; 6. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TEST -DIG ATTHE LOCATION
OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES TO CONFIRM DEPTHS AND TO ENSURE THE PROPOSED
ACSA Indicates hhAl SEWER, STORM AND WATER UP GRADES CAN BE ACHIEVED.
Ln - 456.00 __ - -- -- 7. A KEY BOX SHALL BE PROVIDED ON ALL BUILDINGS FOR EMERGENCY ACCESS.
there Is another q$ +-- -- : CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE MARSHALL's OFFICE TO DETERMINE THE
meter box around ED WATER_ 456.83TC 457.00TC o 1 1 1
PROPOSED 02" COPPER W/L LATERAL 456.23TCLOCATION.
- 456.33EP 456.SOEP
LATERAL w/ CORP. STOP & 1" METER- here. This will need ` 45SA0EP #456.08 -5% 457.00
t be abandoned as / 456.42 EP 3 \
PROPOSED LOW IMPACT CURB CUT w/ well. �S� 456.67TC 1 '
STONE LINED TRAPIZOIDAL CHANNEL -. RENCH
OUTFALLS(26" WIDE AT BOTTOM, 6" m DRAIN LI E WITH CLEANOUTS456.17EP c PROPOSED 2,000 SF
DEEP, 2:2 SIDE SLOPES) (TYP.) =84.o',5
L0
PE=2.75% /�► COMMERCIAL OFFICE
-
1
EXISTING WATER NG
Relocate meter + c.0. FFE=4517. 0 // 1
S =� - • 6 here 1 a^
LATERAL TO BE - - ,. 45 `
PROPOSED 6" PVC SANITARY
ABANDONED \ ,m
+ 456.00TC SEWER SERVICE LATERAL 1 O
EXISTING SANITARY S _ 455.50EP WITH CLEANOUTS
SEWER MANHOLE . 457.08TC 1
TOP=47734 EXISTING BLUE 456.58EP / 457TW
INV IN=469.84 S PAINTED E REMOETAL VED
C g52.83 TOP TRENCH ,Z
NV OUT=469.82 TO BE REMOVED % -'� � -� 'n 9` 453BW
1 L T
457.10TC L� PROPOSED FUTURE 99��,
456P i EX-2 E\ 1" METER O. ` ho WAREHOUSE/ rC Jo
STORAGE BUILDING
' - 457TW T.M. 76Ma 22
EXISTING STORM
/ reuse existing °? G�`r PARCEL a2
r / / MANHOLE \ sewer lateral J p THE BARTLETT REALTY COMPANY, INCORPORATED
V IN 455.91 j 7TW a, Q
INV IN=451.76 / EXISTIN 4 stubout. -161 feet BW 20, AIN GEE EM T J F O D.B. aao o
/ 3 j INV OUT=45043/ / WATER -- - from DS MH. .11 -722) T.M. 76Ma-aa \ vs 5-59
/ \ D B 2 2 THRU 2 PLAT
/ REVISED PARCEL 1 F aao 7 4 1 9 / METER EXISTING MANAGED
EXTop= �CATCH BASIri STEEP SLOPS MILL CREEK INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC �'c2 ZONING: PUD
TIE-IN TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EX NOVPIN4yggp\ zo'SEWEREASEMENT D•B.4715-155 a
EX INV IN=450.19 \ 466. - (D.B. 1129 33) ; D.B. a342 238 THRU 247
PROPOSED INV IN-449.55 \ \ EXISTING STORMMH PLAT ZONING: PUD °
EX INV OUT=449.45 \ \Gr \\__ - �_ OP= 473 45
j - -.--' \` ,� T INVIN=46i.35` PAVED EXISTING DI
INV OUT=461.40 �. / NV IIN=4922
INV OUT=4 24
92.20
/ \ 18" RCP
/ EXISTING PROPERTY
/ BOUNDARY
EXISTING ACSA io" DIP WATERLINE \ � ` \'•
PROPOSEDB"PVC GRAVEL \
SANITARY SEWER MAIN _ '�-_� \ \
_ \ \ EXISTING SANITARY \s \ BENCHMARK:
\ SEWER SERVICE LATERAL IRON & CAP SET
T.M. 76Ma-12 \ ELEVATION=5o8.38
ALL THINGS PAWSSIBLE, INC.
D.B. yyog 27o Sewer is existing
D.B. 3344-393 & 394 PLAT \ ZONING: PUD \/F \
DIP. Clarify If this �.� \
\ �
sewer segment is \
being replaced. E�CISTING SANITARY `\
SEW�fiMANHOLE
TOP=489.92 \ \
INV IN=478.41(LATERAL). TEVE/ INV IN=478-39 EXISTING WAR ALV
\ \ -rr
INV OUT=478.36
' 15 GAS LINE EAS ENT
\ (D.B.2120-214)
NOTES:
a. ALL ROOF DRAINS SHALL DISCHARGE IN A MANNER NOT TO CAUSE A PUBLIC \ /
NUISANCE AND NOT OVER SIDEWALKS.
2. ALL WATER LINE, SEWER LINES, AND FIRE LINES FROM THE MAIN TO THE STRUCTURE
MUST HAVE A VISUAL INSPECTION PERFORMED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. \ / S
ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES AND ACCESS AISLES SHALL NOT HAVE A SURFACE PAVED j
3• T.M. 76Ma-12A �
SLOPE GREATER THAN 1:48. ACCESS AISLES SHALL BE AT THE SAME LEVEL AS THE LOT 1 I EXISTING SANITARY
PARKING SPACE THEY SERVE. FSOB, LLC \ SEWER MANHOLE
D.B. 3618-642 TOP=518.33
INV IN=503-99
D.B. 3535-621 & 622 PLAT INV OUT=S 3 98
ZONING: PUD
20
(I I: AI II I l( �( \H
( IN FEET )
I inch - 20 ft.
n
NA
_lam
SCOTT R. COLLIA,.
Lie. No 035791
'_'i
w c
N
00
m
L9CY' z
C'7 Q
Z CY
CN CL
N
(y) LU
01N V)
CD
W CT)
Q
N
N
iL-L Q
W Q z
��
LU d
Z J
>
T--� J
LIJ T�
� oZS
LD 0 0
J Lu
zT- T-Ja
U Q Z
W ~a
LU
� D z_
U) Q
z�
z LU
Y
LU
CO LU
LU LU
U
J
0 CD H�
O
N
U _.
w �
a V)
JOB NO.
202179
SCALE
1 "=20'
SHEET NO.
4
Review Comments for SDP202000049 Final Site Development Plan
Project Name I Mill Creek Industrial Lot 11 - Final - Digital
Date Completed: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 DepartmenVDivision/Agency: Review Status:
Reviewer: Unassigned I RWSA 1,1 No Objection
Page: 1� Countyof Albemarle Printed On: 08/04/ 0020
Review Comments for SDP202000049 Final Site Development Plan
Project Name Mill Creek Industrial Lot 11 - Final - Digital
Date Completed: Thursday, June 18, 2020 Department/Division/Agency: Review Status:
Reviewer: Brian Becker CDD E911 i- No Objection
Page: 1� Countyof Albemarle Printed On: 08/04/ 0020