Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
WPO201700028 Plan - Revision 2020-08-18
TH OWNER/APPLICANT: 078EO-00-00-000AO HIGHLAND PARK, LLC 455 2ND STREET, SW CHARLOT7ESV`LLE, VA 22903 ENGINEER: COLLINS ENGINEERING 200 GARRETT ST SUITE K CHARLOT7ESWLLE, VA 22902 (434)293-3719 TAX MAP NO.: 078EO-00-00-000A0 — 15.21 ACRES (DB 4163 PG 429) 078EO-00-00-000A2 — 0.51 ACRES (DB 4983, PG 688) TOTAL PROJECT AREA: 15.72 ACRES TOTAL ZONING: R-4 RESIDEN77AL W l7H PROFFERS ZMA 04-18 (APPROVED MARCH 19, 2008) PROPOSED USE: 34 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED UNITS REQUIRED DENSITY: MAXIMUM ALLOWED UNITS = 34 SFD LOTS PROPOSED DENSITY- 34 DU/15.21 AC = 2.24 UNITS/AC OPEN SPACE. REQ: 3.80 AC OF DEVELOPMENT AREA (25%); PROV.• OPEN SPACE A (0,51 AC) OPEN SPACE B (361 AC) OPEN SPACE C (0.45 AC) OPEN SPACED (0.55 AC) OPEN SPACE E (0.40 AC) OPEN SPACE F (0.05 AC) TOTAL OPEN SPACE = 5.57 AC (359) THE OPEN SPACE WILL BE DEDICATED TO THE HOA. BUILDING HEIGHTS: MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 35 FEET SETBACKS. • FRONT. 5' MIN AND 25' MAX (18' MIN. FOR FRONT LOADED GARAGES) SIDE., 10' BUILDING SEPARATION REAR: 20' MIN AND NO MAX SUBDIVISION STREETS: CURB & GUTTER (PARKING ON ONE SIDE ONLY) WATERSHED: THIS PARCEL IS NOT IN A WATER SUPPLY PROTECTED AREA — SITE DRAINS TO RIVANNA RIVER. AGRICULTURAL/ FORESTAL DISTRICT NONE TOPO & SURVEY. TOPOGRAPHY AND BOUNDARY INFORMA77ON PROVIDED BY ROUDABUSH & GALE. BOUNDARY AND TOPO WAS COMPLETED IN ✓ANUARY 201 Z TOPOGRAPHY IS AN AERIAL TOPOGRAPHY OF THE SITE TOPO WAS VERIFIED IN THE FIELD IN ✓ANUARY 2016. DATUM: NAD 83 EXIS77NG VEGETATION: PAR77ALLY WOODED WITH EXIS77NG RESIDENCE STRUCTURES LIGHTING: NO LIGHTING IS PROPOSED PHASING: SITE TO BE DEVELOPED IN ONE PHASE. RECREATION: NOT APPLICABLE/NOT REQUIRED PARKING: 2 OFF—STREET PARKING SPACES SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EACH DWELLING UNIT ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES SHALL BE LOCATED ALONG THE ROADWAYS. BUILDING SITES PARCELS 1-34 MAY NOT BE FURTHER DIVIDED. ONLY (1) DWELLING UNIT PER LOT SHALL BE ALLOWED. BURIAL SITES: NONE STREAM BUFFERS/FLOODPLAIN: THIS SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN ZONE X. THERE IS NO 100—YEAR FLOODPLAIN LIMITS ON THE SUBJECT PARCEL, PER FEMA MAP 51003CO287D & 51003CO295D• FEBRUARY 4, 2005. THERE ARE NO STREAM BUFFERS LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY. OFFSI7F DISTURBANCE., NO OFFSIDE DISTURBANCE IS PROPOSED WITH THIS PLAN, EXCEPT FOR THE 77E—IN CONNEC77ON TO THE SANITARY SEWER WITHIN EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT LANDSCAPING: STREET TREES ARE PROPOSED ALONG THE NEIGHBORHOOD STREETS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALBEMARLE COUNTY LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS WITHIN SECTION 32.7.9 OF THE COUNTY CODE. LAND AREAS: OPEN SPACE.• 5.57 AC. (359) LOTS 7.69 AC. (51%) ROW DEDICATION: 2.46 AC. (16%) IIIII111IIIIIIII --- ^ - ^'� (Well 11111 (IIII IIIIIIIIII � � �_ IIIIIIIIII ---'rj� tl I �\ %�%• a= / r r / ! I � I HYLAN D PARK EARLY GRADING PERMIT PLAN VSMP AMENDMENT RIVANNA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA 'vzx,r ///I/ ��--- Illl�llll/%Iri~o \ ''✓���%r��� - ./� \ \"+7°.T) \ - \` //ll �`//��, _ l l''I I �\ \\ \ \\\\\\0\\ \ \\\\\\ ` \ `\ -\�` IIIF//fll l \. _--- "i Il111111� / II - _ �Ov�� ..J�^�lT `T ' A k 1 I II II V / 1 A �V A AAA\VAAAv^ `v AAA v A A A \ \ \ \ I ////IA f I�1J,-�� /�'^^/ 1 i 111 IIIIII Ilk l '" \ \ \�\\ \\� 1/,`I/^/ I i//.. I j', { \ \ /R /,.r/,�I �\... t km,^. �..� _'-�J���^��,\\\1\ ,\�•. � /! // _ \-- _.. ~� 1\\\.\\\\ \ \ \ 111�1�\ \\\ \ \ \�\�\\\\\ \ \ \\ 1111\ \ll\\\\� r�_ � =��5� — \ '7-. �^\\ �//// i /'.,� , � i�•.� xx \`O`�11�\\\\\2\`\1 ///J////�__ �`\= ii��\\ \ � .\1/ 111\1 \\\ \ \ \ \1\ f l ,� �� \\\ /1 I fell l a �P"en;>Xnri 'C\ 1 \ \\ III \\\ \T' OPEN SPACE - / / /_. .- \\ \ \ \\..\ >\\ \� \ \ \\\ -�/ /\_ •r \\ 11 1 II _ _ 11 II / \ I 0.51 AC , "„'� ? \-- _...\O\�\\���.:\\"LOB\� \\ f�. `_ �\ 11111 11\\\\ �✓/ \1\\\\ / 1 / ' - 11 I ! \ �^; a-_� .T� \ >• 4Q'/J ��Y � \ /, .�".n. / %\ ��„fi �\\� I)\\\\\\\\\\ ��`�-��\ \\`� /Jf/ %// 1\\ \\\\\\\\\ ---= \ �-- `_ -_ -_- '// IIIIIII I I �I- � f / / \ � � \J \\ff , �.: , , `\� .>,\ \`O\\\�: �` ��.�\�, \\fit I!1 I, \\\\\\\\\\\\\\���\ / \\ \ \ � //'' � I -, / 111 I I I / • // 11/ Iil/1f IIII III 1 III I �' / I >' � '�a--- r m' _."- i, i• � ��\\\\\\\)1 •'ll l��r \L � I o /t \ \ \\\\\\ \\\\\ \` \\\`i .( \ 1 \\\\ />// 1/1/%II (IIIIIIII I l 1 I I I I Its y. I I I I I \-\ \ \ \ \ ( / / / r , � ,,. �.. I\111i ., r., � I ♦\` �\� \�` _ �//// /r III I I 1 \ 1 \ - \ \ \�\ \ ! v'Ml I�/ / \ k�,� 4 J\., ' / �ALL��-t\��, _;.��-�\ `�1•``� \ \\ \ -__; __- hl IIII1111\�II\ I I � 1 \\ \\ \ \ \ \\\ \Q\\ \\\ \\71 \\\\Q\ - \ �0\\ VIA FLORENCE ROAD - \. =1 `=of�`-: \c\ �-•\'� \ i \ \ \ \ \ \ \��\\\Q\\\\�\\� \ \ \ \\ \\ II<-_ ------ _ --_ _ -_- — 'OPEN SPACE 8 3.61 AC - - - - - - - Ill\ ij ell I �_ �\ \ _- _ /�'/ i/i -1 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ � \\\ \ 1 I \ 1 I 1 I I' --�� _� \ l ` I 1 r _ l � I •, ,.��`_ r SHEET LAYOUT SCALE: 1" = 125' - 1 =N SFACE� C r 1 \ \ 0.45 AC ``��`vAA�A���vAIIIIII 0 � \\II I I Illllf A` / � I I I / 11111!/M i l 1 I1 `\\I \\ ����'_`-\ -I111IIIIII!lll l!IIIII�iili fill -/- --F-, \ I I I I II I I I I II I I I II I I I I I I IIIIIIIIII I II �1 �%��----- - -- - \ I\I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 II II I II II IIII I I 111111111111 I t III Vol IIII PLAN REVISIONS s. REVISED PROPOSED OVERLOT GRADING. 2. REVISED PROPOSED WALL SYSTEM. VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1" = 2000' Sheet List Table Sheet Number Sheet Title I COVER 3 EXISTINGCONDITIONS 3 EROSION&SEDIMFAITCONTRO OI ANNARRATIVC 4 PHASE I EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 5 PHASEEROSIeN & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN PHAS€ II�€.�� c�:^on,T�Sy€Dlnem �,�nIT �a l�Tonl o�� 7 PHASE 11 EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 7A PHASE III EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 8 EROSION & SEDIMENT ITROLDETAIII S 9 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 1-9 STn RMWATER MANAGEMENT PROFILES DETAILS }} STnRMWATER MAAIAGEMFA T DETAILS T2 FINALFINAI GRADINGPLAN 13 FINAL GRADING PLAN 1 LANDSCnol NG PI AN is LANDSCAPING PLAN 5 TOTAL SHEETS LEGEND ROADS EXISTING CULVERT CULVERT 0 DROP INLET & STRUCTURE NO. CURB CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED PAVEMENT EC-3A DITCH 6" DEPTH OF EC-3A DITCH EC-2 DITCH g DEPTH OF EC-2 DITCH EARTH DITCH DRIVEWAY CULVERT + BENCH MARK CLEARING LIMITS T VDOT STANDARD STOP SIGN zoo EXIS77NG CONTOUR 200 PROPOSED CONTOUR 240.55 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVA77ON TBC DEN07ES TOP/BACK OF CURB T/B DEN07ES TOP OF BOX APPROVALS DATE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNER/ZONING ENGINEER INSPECTIONS ARB DEPARTMENT OF FIRE RESCUE ALBEMARLE COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY VIRGINIA DEPARMENT OF TRANSPORTATION HEALTH DEPARTMENT TOTT R. COLLINS'Z I Lic. No. 035791,E 'IONAL z O a� Z L O 0 to Z J O j..j in � Z w W w z LU Cn LU I i` Q z z N CW G Q � m N O n I n CD 0'' ° W > a W z N O W Q c— J ZJ J N >' � ° v^ o LU n L9��/ L U -0O N 1LW 'L' / 3 Q c _ [n U ° u ' U V z 0 W� Y 0 LU Q n c �— a cl) Ul V E ° CD z LU LU Z J w w z �/ z w (J) 1 'Q LLJ ' z J 1 0 L Q o n O p O 0 U x zs w ° U V 0 ~ o° a w L JOB NO. 162126 0 SCALE ° AS SHOWN o 0 COLLINS ENGINEERING IS NOT RESPONSIBLE OR LIABLE FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION OR DAMAGES TO THIS PROJECT PRIOR TO ALL FINAL PLAN APPROVALS. SHEET NO. 1 n N N H EXISTING TREELINE (TYP.) - \ w/ WIRE SF \ \ % SUPPORT \ \ I PROPOSED WALL Pared construction entrance for erosion control plans _�--- STONE � —70' WIN - CONSTR \ 560 \ \ \ i _ �-- /- � ,-560, \ `\ \\` _i \ \ ACCESS CouRSE ACCESS- )� SV 2F A$%'1WyI 'DP v % \ t % - ROPOS_E LIMITIMIT_ S OF TREE CLEARING (TYP.) \ \ _ _ / / _ f �`' V \ \ \ / l _ — — �� � S7O- � V A � / � � � ��i � � -6- MI, 2,A AGGREGATE BASE \ \ PROFIT 9 NSTRUCTION A ASPHALT PAVED 580 - \ \ \ ` �, \ \ ` CESS WASNRACN \ _ v EXISTING PRESERVED — — _ -- V vV -\ zx EXISTING Sgz \ - S-F W/ WIRE \ STEEP SLOPES (TYP.) - _ \ \ \ \ \ y lzx ,z' uN.• --- _ _ -_SUPPORT \ - LOW DIRECTION \ \ EXTEND_Pos4Tn2 DRAINAGE_ 58o- \ _ ARROW TYP. Da�ua INGRESS FULL rSEDIMENT _ (TYP.) , \.\ I TRAPPING OFN1 \ 622 EXISTING MANAGED I 6°$ \ - -\ - \ \ - - - STEEP_SLOPES (TYP.) \ \ - -- _. - - WITH PROPERTY LINE NI THIS AREAS \ 5 \ _ COIN ES PROPOSED LIMITS OF ---- / i 604 DC 606 - \ \ 6o8 — 6 _ - �♦ PS \ \ \ \\ \ EXISTING\MANAGED\ \\ °a 618 — — ��_' \ \ \ \ \ ` \ - \ — °z- -\ - LL \ \ \ \\STEEP SLOPES (TYP.)\ \ \ + ♦Ale AIV� -\ — 624 PS o8.- 604 _ �\ _PROPOSED LIMITS OFTREE CLEARING (TYP.) \ \ \ \ \ PROPOSED WALL \ ♦ - _ _ — -- \ 610 - \ \ \ \ ) \ / \ \ ♦ DRAINAGE DIVIDE (TYP. +y+ \ \ \ \ zi \ ♦ PS \�+� \ n sZs_ moo w/ WIRE I . _ a. 62y S F \ \ \ \ \\ 2 o 626 \ \ �— - - SUPPORT � I \Cb \ \ \ CD 1 628 \ \ PROPOSED LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE (TYP.) \ M \ +�A* \' o \, 6-7, \ PS \ 4R WALL N M \ w/ WIRE SF \ ♦ \� SUPPORT ° o N 6 s i z rn LU _ PHASE III DRAINAGE \ / `N620, 62 AREA TO SBz=z.g1 AC. \ % N — FLOW DIRECTION %� \ v� z l ARROW (TYP.) Cw=0.45t TC=11.o MIN \ / m 616 6i4 .. / ;� v EXISTING TREELINE (I YP_)CIO V v \ Z P 1mD I)_ \ �_ •- -, � d OCATION OF FUSING AREA DC 61 � T I NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE POSITIVE � DRAINAGE ALONG DIVERSION DIKE 10 a 0 DC - 60 LOCATION OF DUMPSTER _ / /I / / \ \ \ Q I �': ♦ h'- 6o6 I C� I PROPOSED WALL ° PROPOSED VDOT STD. ES i _ \ �o -- - \ LL.I ` / - - - \ - OCATION OF PORTA-PO_TTY__ -� PROPOSED LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE COINCIDES J z NOTE: THIS CONSTRUCTI 6Op� WITH PROPERTY LINE IN THIS AREA O N ON ENTRANCE SHALL BE s ' Soo _TI. b2o \ J f` INSTALLED, OPERATED, AND MAINTAINED BYTHE C I P �° + - �t / (, o J I I CE P 5g8 • CONTRACTOR STAGING AREA CONTRACTOR. ALL CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC IN THIS , / \ U) o AREA SHALL UTILIZE THIS CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. - 7 WASH RACK LOCATION \ j (I' LU LU ~ a / / U a � ♦ v v ��� SF' f GRAPHICC LE O 1 a PROPOSED 3.5" RCP CULL9 VERT - - I� RW D \ ; • * - \ J LLI 3 -s- \ PORT 30 0 5 30\ % 6o Izo�_ 0 INV. IN-578.00, INV. OUT-574 67, Cr I — LU k \ / / 65.o LF Oa 5.12D/o tl, \ \ \ _ Q (n .. � • _ \ / SIN FEET U dS o - \ PROPOSED STOCKPILE AREA TO BE z `� PROPOSED VDOT STD. ES-i ---' � I, '' � I' `rfl sy ` `'x� ENCOMPASSED BYSILT � "FENCE AT ALL TIMES � vv2 W U) \ , 1 3.07 1992 3.11 � o �,� �� I- O y / ( PROPOSED VDOT EW-1 AND VDOT EC-1 CLASS Al OUTLETI Sz� - �� . 96 � S B 2 PROTECTION w/ GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC UNDERLAYMENT OP \ _ 90 P (L=20', W1=4.5', W2=9.5'; D=1.4' MIN.) l / I - j PROPOSED SAFETY FENCE ♦+ � AROUND SEDIMENT BASIN" i all NOTE: SEE SHEET 8 FOR/ I DESIGN INFORMATION / / PROPOSED LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE COINCIDES W/ WI � NSF` _ � -_ WITH PROPERTY LINE IN THIS AREA SU PPCRT PROPOSED VDOT EW-1 AND VDOT EC 1 CLASS Al TP -• — OP- OUTLET PROTECTION w/GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC C� vUNDERLAYMENT (L=8', W1=4.5', W2=9.5'; D=2' MIN.) PROPOSED 15" BARREL PROPOSED 30" STANDPIPE TO, SERVE AS RISER STRUCTURE LIMITS OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY PRESERVED STEEP SLOPES HAVE BEEN DETERMINED TO BE LESS THAN 25% BASED ON NEW TOPOGRAPHIC I INFORMAAON TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER, AS 11` Z _ PERMITTED UNDER SECTION 30.7.4(b)h. ;COTT R. COLLINS�Z Lie. No. 035791 4 �1'SIONAL Ems` z O w CO Z O o Z M � J 1�1 O Z � z H W Lu a cf) Ul V I --I a LU �0 z W Z J � w w Q w Q CD z W ttttttttttt� cf) w = � z o ttttJ LU ` ' s o � y o Q Q Q v O C: U x N z w U J U P w 0 t-u V E U a 1OB NO. m 162126 0 N SCALE 1 "=30' 0 SHEET NO. o. Source: Va. DSWC Plate 3.11-1 Source: Va. DSWC Plate 3.07-6 r Watershed Summary *_r STORMWATER MANAGEMENT NARRATIVE: \ THE PROPOSED PLAN PROVIDES STORMWATER TREATMENT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF \ \ \ kv. \ - - HYLAND PARK LOTS i UNDER SEPARATE REVIEW THIS VSMP PLAN ADHERES TO PART IIB \ \ - \ �\ 34( ) \ \ \\ \ ` \ REQUIREMENTS FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT THE SUBMITTAL PACKAGE DOCUMENTS \ ', \ \ \ ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PLAN SHOW WATER QUALITY COMPLIANCE BEING MET THROUGH THE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE OF OPEN SPACE PRESERVATION (1.31 ACRES), AND A \ \ ; \\ \� ` \ \ ! f/ _ PHOSPHOROUS CREDIT PURCHASE OF 8. LB/YEAR. THIS PLAN ALSO COMPLIES WITH PART LOCATION OF \ \\ s= I1 I \ \ \ f - / / / Total= 7.24 ac. 7.24 ac. \ \ \ - -\ \ 54 \ ` IKN \\\ \ q I` )\�\\\ \\\ \ \ f/ /� // - \\ \\ \ \/ \_ - \-.\\\`_ -� \\\\\\ i\\\.___ IIB REQUIREMENTS BY THE ATTENUATION OF FLOWS IN THE TWO DETENTION BASINS. PLEASE _ n PROPOSED BASIN 'A' \ \Ill\ _\\ l \ \ .�, -- // / !/ / -SEETHE ATTACHED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CALCULATIONS PACKET FOR THE FULL / ,, - \ \ \ \ ^ \ / - Outflow Summary: 2-Year Storm Event ` \ - J - - - \ \ \ ` \ - \ _ - DETAILS OF PLAN COMPLIANCE. zn \ ♦ \\l`\`- \\\ COUNTY //!!!/- rY ( ) \ \ \ �`" \ \ \\`\\\\\\\ \ 1F ao \ - _ \ c ; '/ / / / / / r \ \\\ - \ ` DEFINED/ // // /! Pre -Development Post -Development \ \ r PRESERVED STEEP w V ♦ / \ SLOPES TYP IX co w III I{./-} \C\ , \ / / / / -' -\ ■ \\ \ \� - \\ \\\ \\\/!!/�/, ///, !/ \ t \ \ �1 4 \ \ I - Pre-Develo ment p Post -Development DA W DA'B' 5.14 ac. 2.10 ac. 5.14 ac. 2.10 ac. Total= 2.83cfs 0.49cfs \ a" � \ \\ \\ \ /J ✓✓ '-__ :-- ��.\-_ `\\� � � �--- --� -�\`� `�_ _---- �/--� \�_-�\ � ,\\ \ \\ EXISTING,'/:-// \ / �_ \-__ ..\ F _-- \ _ // / / Outflow Summary. (10-Year Storm Event) \ \ \ _ \ \ // -- \ \ -Sao- , \ ` \ _ _ \ � TREELINE // / / \ \ \ \ Pre -Development Post -Development TMP; 078E0 00 00-000AO \ - \ / /i --_` �QT11ViYDEFHdED- \\ OWNER: HYLAND PARK,LLC_\\\ - PR€SEI�V-MSLOPES �'` / _ --- - - -. - /� / ✓ \ \ \ \�� \ \ '-. /,// / '/ -\- \ ACREAGE. 16.38 AC _ \� _ - Total= 11.72cfs 8.82cfs ZONING: R4RESIDENTIAL - -`< -- DB/PG: 4163/429 \ \ \-: ,. - a DRAINAGE AREA A ♦ TMP: 078EO-00-00-000A0 ---- \ \\ \I\ ♦ \ OWNER:` HYLAND PARK LLC- ., ♦ 5.14 ACRES ♦ ---=1- / I // ACREAGE: 16.38AC ------ i 7--------- CN=57 \ \ \ \\ ZONING: R4RESIDENTIAL\\ \\_-\_\- _ ------- \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ l / o ' / __\ ` �� _ --- \ \_ \ 7 ��---------' �/' /� Tc=0-.20 hrs.. \ \ \\ \ / / // / / / /\ \ \ 1 \\ \ \ \ \\\\ \\\\ _-_ _ \ \ n\ � / I // / ---� \ �\ \\ �\ �__ �_- _-•\. ' DB PG: 4163 429 1 \ \ <„°. \\ \ \ \ \ \ 1 \ \ \ - � °� � \ IRV*\ / //, / / tip\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ J / / /-- \ \-\ ---_-- _ab` 's /f /- `-- \\ `\ ♦ COUNTY DEFINED \ \ MANAGED STEEP / / / \ �� 1016 ♦� `440 Tc=o:io,1hrs. \ \ \\ •� SLOPES (TYP)\ \\\ \ \ \ \ \ I ♦� / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ a\ ♦ / / / / � \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ' D.A. 'A' Pre-Develo ment Impervious Areas Water Quantity) I ,,160 sf ,//// / \ \\\\ \\ C'\\ \1 \ \ Existing DrivExisting e&rWalkways es 4528sf \\ \ ;1 )/ *� \ L° \\\ \\\ , ' /'// \_\�\\ \ \ \ \\\.`\�.`\\ \ \ , / /, \ DRAINAGE AREA'B' _ \ \ / \ \ \' \ \ \ Total = 4,688 sf ♦ \ \ / / / / �- \J \\\ \\ ♦ / / -- \ \ \ \ \ \ `�``° \\ \ \ \ I D.A.'A'Pre-Development Pervious Areas (Water Quantity) / \ 2.10 ACRES •f' - - \ ♦ / / // /// - - JftiloftlExisting Woods 194,250sf \ CN=55 ► - v v v a� ► v Existing // \\\ \ Tc=0.19 hrs. P 960sf ..���� / /r // / / / /' /// / - \ \\ `\ _ ♦ D.A.'B Pre -Development I \ L- \ `\ �i \ �, / r � --\ � -�\ \\\ \� - - __ ___` ♦ _ - \ \ \ \ \ ' ' Impervious Areas Quantity) -� Existing Structures Osf Existing Drive&Walkways 0sf 3 1 ' 20 \ ♦��� / // •/ ca- -__`\ \\\\\`\- --\ -` \ \\ \\\\\ \ \ ) I 1 \ \\ COUNTY �I� Total= Osf / -s50-_ -\ \ \ \� / II 3 1 \\ \ \ '.� Tc=o.1 hrs. / \ _ � D.A.'BPre-Development Pervious Areas (Water Quantity) ! I i I �-- \.9 \ \- \\ \\, \ \\ \ SLOPES (TYP) 9 \\ % ♦t \ \ \ ExistingWoods 90,038 sf �� MANAGED ISLOPES _--1 v v v Existing Grass 1,438sf v I v v SLO / v - / v v - I�/rov^���ft�� v` -� -v (TYP)_ -- 1 vv \\yvv \\..+ // / I I� / /z �./I lii �♦ \ \V A jVAI 1\\VA�v v//- // ��/-ij'/ ,\ -\_ -�\ `-\\ / _ A vdo \ v\ \ V... \ \ i.. jl / / I �l l I / IA /._ ♦ - I V vvvv vv vv_,. �� ���: ����►� _ _ v _ 1 v vv/ �I �_._ _.0 - - .-� �.. �. �I \ - _ ! / ' \ LOCATION OF 41 • - - \ / so '��♦ \' \ \ \ _ / , \ \ M _ _ _- -_ _ / I \ \ \ ," I '.�' D BASIN r I I I !! --EXISTING VIA FLORENCE RD - - - - - i \ `•�. �� PROPOSE 17 PUBLIC ROAD - 25 MPH / �` ♦� x \ \ \\ (IN FEET) inch = 60 ft -- 1 m _ _ -.\- \ \, IPROPOSED 1 ACRES TOTAL CONSERVATION \ \ \ \ \\ \ 3 _ _ -- \ \ \ \ \ �\ \ 1 \ \ \ - l `\ General Construction notes for Stormwater Management Plans LAND FOR SWM QUALITY CREDIT (SEE GRADING - \ 1- _ _ \ z. All dams and constructed fill to be within 95h of maximum drydensity � SHEETS FOR FULL EXTENT) -� \\ \ ) \ \ / \ \ *,*+'+*+ +., % \' - �,'� -/ --- --\\\ `\ -\\� \7s\\\ \ \ `--- optimum moisture content. All fill material to be approved bya geotechnical engineer.A �r - - J _ J - ` _ - _ _ \ \ \ - \ \ \ \ \\e\ \\\ \ / - \ \ ` geotechnical engineer is to be present during construction of dams. +'\ \\\\\��• a++ + w / �. - -- J \ \ \ \\ 5 I \ _- PROPOSED 1.31 ACRES TOTAL CONSERVATION _ / \ \\ \ \ \ ^\\ Pipe and riserjoints are to be watertight within Stormwater Management facilities. u PROPOSED DETENTION �� \ \ l t) \ LAND FOR SWM QUALITY CREDIT (SEE GRADING - - J / \ \\ \ \�\ \'I\ \ 1 1 \ \ 1 \ \ \ % '• _ _ - - \ �`° \ \ / \ \ temporary P P ;X _ \ / � N \ \ �\ ^ - \\ \ \. \ \ \ \ \ \ � �. 3. Fortem ora sediment traps or basins which are to be converted to permanent \ SHEETS FOR FULL EXTENT) stormwater management facilities; conversion is nottotakeplace until the site is I¢ - `� \ ;\ \- \'.. _ _saw- - \ \ \ \ \ , - - 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ _\ \ _ - - stabilized, and permission has been obtained from the County erosion control inspector. \\ " as _ COUNTY DEFINED /!//- -- \\ \\\\ }\\ \ i / / _ _ - Iz `` PRESERVED STEEP ', // / \ \ \\\ \ \ \\\` \/ Pr, \ \\ / + SLOPES(TYP) ! \ \ \ \ \ \\1 m � - \ �� _---/ /-• _ � \\r,\ \ + COUNTY DEFINED / \ .'.','.'. /////' ///- \`\\\ \\\ \\\ s\\\\\'ti\ \\ \ \ \\ PRESERVED SLOPES (TYP} _ \� RAINAGEAREA A ♦. \ \ no 5.14 ACRES i +;+a + + I� r. + a a ♦++ + «+ , CN=76 +« PROPOSED1. 1ACRESTOTA - 3 L CONSERVATION TC=O.17 hrs. / LAND FOR SWM QUALITY CREDIT SHEETS FOR FULL EXTENT) \ 1 \ \ _ C j - - vvv v vv v v y D.A. A Post -Development ) ��v p Impervious ��, // I \ ♦\\ \ Roadway 25,316 sf \\ \ \ / > \ ♦ , Sidewalks & Driveways 15,817 sf \\ \ 1 ( \ / / \ \\ Buildings 50,784 sf / Tc=o.17 h rs. �� v v v v v `� ; Total = 91,917 sf D.A.'B'Post-DevelopmentlmperviousAreas(WaterQuantity) I I \ \ I I Roadway 22,624 sf 1 1 ,� Sidewalks & Driveways 14,893 sf Buildings 14,843 sfvv n .\ / Total = 52,360 sf �� vvv vv Total Post-Dev. On -Site Impervious Areas (Water Quality) 7 ) % OF ♦ Roadway 63,192 sf AW*.� A A V A / '�.. \ , ; / � .•J ♦ Sidewalks &Driveways 40,327 sf \\ �£ Buildings 108,946 sf + + + ' Total - f \ + 212 465 s ��♦ vvv �v r err e ��- `+ I a + ♦ + + A i GRAPHIC SCALE.,\ EXISTING VIA FLORENCE RD ���..��' , 240' A PUBLIC ROAD - 25 MPH + a +, v % I ( IN FEET + +. + + ` «« ++++++ - 60 1 inch - ft. �\ I / A \ DA'A' 2.11 cfs 0.40 cfs DA'B 0.73 cfs 0.09 cfs DA'A' 8.48 cfs 8.40 cfs DA'B' 3.24 cfs 0.42 cfs r / /�aL /'r 2.10 ACRES N=82 `Tc=0.1�4 hrs`. r \ WRAW _ _ �I / PR PO I� DETENTION/ AI / / D v v...� _ � IlA A SCOTT R. COLLINS'_Z Lic. No. 035791,a Z O d ZU w � O n �n Z - O L > z w W ce z Uj L9 ti Q M Zcyi z N CwC G M a ° a a O ' ) V>' o ° W N N zo 0 Q W I zao Q J° L < o J Z J J z= � LLJ c L ~ � W F--I W v ° L9O / Q o J LL w Z Q 0 0 3 ZU U 0 � z_ LLJ 0 a W Y Q Q o Ul (D p c 0 z LU LU Z J � w w z � Q z w (n w z L J o o LLI � a Q a C9 a O Q O Q N z O U J J O F w L d w to � U 30B NO. 162126 0 SCALE 1"-60' c 0 0 a SHEET NO. 9 m 0 4 COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE COURSE,VDOT#21A SURFACE COURSE TH 0 NOTE: JUNIPER PLANTINGS SHALL BE REQUIRED _ -- ON ALL SLOPES STEEPER THAN a (TYP.) -S60 \ _ - ' S / 60. SCOTT R. COLLINS_Z L) Lic. No. 035791,E C, 570- COMPACTED 5 ��o� �w4 - -- - ss7 -- 9° No DISTURBANCE SHALL occuRwlrHIN- --_ \ CLASS A - TYPE 1 LOW -MAINTENANCE ANAL E - AREAS OF PRESERVED STEEP SLOPES saD _ -- - - - - - - - PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY DETAIL NO SCALE 598Bw \ \ 59z 3 \ \ \ 56o 604TW \ I \ v PROPOSED WALL NO DISTURBANCE SHALL OCCUR WITHIN- O2 (MAX. HEIGHT=4'to 8') -AREAS OF PRESERVED STEEP SLOPES o \- ---- - - - -- - ,-. - - - 580 - - 570 z LOT 30 k f - \ w �\ %598Bw \/Y `- 6�z \ - LIMITS OF EXISTING ALBEMARLE COUNTY PRESERVED STEEP SLOP HAVE BEEN DETERMINED 598BW .R �,O�� H 60 �C p 9 37 M RVE ES Z FFE=6z0.20 '6o0 _ 6 / S90 - TO BE LESS THAN 25% BASED ON NEW TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION TO THE SATISFACTION 0 Q Z f f BSMT=6o LOT 29 /�, s°o / -DFTHE COUNTY ENGINEER, AS PERMITTED UNDER SECTION 30.7.4(b)h rA o j \ 6a9.7a I PROPOSED WALL - -- - - - --- - V/ U FFE-62g.6z (MAX. HEIGHT=y') wLn ca LU/ - ° I. - -- o Z P � J Q S BSMT=6o8.78 �60 \ o w 62 LOT 3zi I I LOT z8 604 / ! /\ - - - O co Uj LU I \ 5948 FFE=62o.42 " i - \ 60O _- -- ----- ~ o PROPOSED WALL - _ BSMT-�6o9.5g A, s a.7o 6a.vs> FFE 6i8.3o A - - ° U') (MAX. HEIGHT=6') _ - N \ V �,i� BSMT=607-47 W LU -AREAS OF PRESERVED STEEP CSLOPES HI LOT z LOT 26 - _ \ SOO 7 / FFE=66.7o 6i -� - gob boy 6og8 - PROPOSED WALL A 7.00 -- -� BSMT=6o 88 y - ry (MAX. HEIGHT=6'to8') _LOT 2 \ 2 -� FFE=627:00 20 , S- G� \ �1 ,� BSMT-60 a 622TW 200?x - 6o6BW `6 \ 594 6ogT XISTING MANAGED STEEP SLOPES - \\ �� \ ct) - / 61oTW V �, �z+o 6d663 BSMT=6o8.30 63.9.2o EP A, / 6i8_ °7BW -1) CD m 2� �jo "• vi I 5�4Tw FFE=6zz.00 wF C \ \ \ tp \ BF��U \� ,` / 6aoBW BSMT=6iz.17 p p f 6i .3. I OV I V � � A RT / I zo W S N • � % " • . 4 R� „.I 2y 36 �a NOTE: JUNIPER PLANTINGS SHALL BE REQUIRED 620.6o ON ALL SLOPES STEEPER THAN LOT 24 0� Q _ z M \ /•"° ° �- 35 4 � 8 � W n, X 62o.w N L �, - ' / EXISTING MANAGED STEEP SLOPES - I , / 33 / 6a6 08 37 / y 40A b ��� / CID 6a6.7o 6a7.�a 34 38 : ° \X / l �� m LU I LOT 2 FFE=6>7.60 1 a 3 LOT34 ti� �/_ Fo\ \, \ FFE=6zz.00 _6Zo / �c M LOT 2 - BSMT=6o6.77 I' � Q 1 33 r \ 9 0 9 I FFE=63 .i �, FFE=6i6-So x � f` z EXISTING ROADSIDE 6' I 9 3 °0 6r,6 pB� � � � ` DITCH TO REMAIN o BSMT=6o7-30 I / \ \\\ o V 3 zB i , 6a° LOT 22 ` Q 6D 6D zo PUBLIC o N FFE-6zo. oDRA NAGS EASEMENT A v is N \ 579 PROPOSED WALL \60 �� 1 I � I (MAX. HEIGHT=6') �6 / � 606 1 �' � / � /C' Q � 578.0o INV. °o / / _ - o 2A 607. _ I 3 � LOT 2s \\\ is LL PROPOSED VDOT STD. ES-1 A� � I / i�LLi 'o �- / / z 17-20 o o 579•25 E e, 60 �o � \ \ � - . �jz- � J 0 47- 600 - % o0 9 \ j O 0 LU l 579.5o 48 x y i0 \ PROPOSED 20' PUBLIC LIMITS OF EXISTING ALBEMARLE COUNTY PRESERVED STEEP SLOPES \ LLI _ (BERM) B1� DRAINAGE EASEMENT \ / HAVE BEEN DETERMINED TO BE LESS THAN 25% BASED ON NEW Q S9o-~ LOT 20 TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ` o zo+Qo 45 � � N ., 578.76 i. COUNTY ENGINEER AS PERMITTED UNDER SECTION 30.7.4(b)h z Io+ o 31, FFE=6>o:60 \ \ / / Z'L9 J i CULVERT #2 So -_ ti�+5 /D�.P - ��PROPOSED VDOTSTD. EW-i / �� 44 /% h ° - � -- -- - �'� � � 0 RIPRAP OUTFACE �� �. �� - RAPHIC SCALE I 0 PROPOSED VDOT STD. ES-> 43 zi+ o / / Zz+oo % �'. A / 3� U 66 ao © 15 36 `€xo. 120 PROPOSED VDOT STD. EW-i6y 1� Z o o <, w/ RIPRAP OUTFALL / \ p �` / Cr / _ IN FEET //POP ED B SN 1inc 30 Q 0 ll 6 i i Ul TIE-IN RIPRAP OUTFACE TO EXISTING � _g 59. 59 5� / � � � I �' � - y ,� / � , \ � I, I _ \� �\ 25" CMP CULVERT, INV. IN= \\ 57440 ' / - 49 9 52 CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM EXISTING CULVERT ELEVATION &REMOVE ANY EXISTING DEBRIS PRIOR So INSTALLING THE PROPOSED STORM SEWER OUTFACE I I PROPOSED WALL TO I I o (MAX. HEIGHT=6') PROPOSED VAR. WIDTH - ✓� e )" 'I DRAINAGE & SWM EASEMENT EXISTING ROADSIDE DITC i PRE -DEVELOPMENT DRAINA E I AREATO EXISTING s5 CULVERT- D.A.=3.37 ACRES, Tc=14 MIN., Cw=O.45- i,_.� i _ - / Q2=5.46 CFS, Qio=7.43 CFS r, i POST -DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE z/ - I _- AREA TO EXISTING "CULVERT / v i I I 15 / is Q2=S-35 CFS, Q3.0=7.39 CFS - - (SEE SHEET 16 ON THE FINAL ROAD PLAN FOR POST -DEVELOPMENT FLOW CALCULATIONS) / 'z - - Q-PO T < Q-PRE- / DRAINAGE DESCRIPTIONS PIPE INFORMATION INLET INFORMATION STIR. NO. DIA. (i9.) LENGTH" (ft.) SLOPE (°k) INVERT IN INVERT OUT MATERIAL INLETTYPE Curb Ty pe SLOT LENGTH RIM ELEVATION COMMENTS 40B DI-3B CG-6 14 615.50 VDOT STD. IS-1 REQ'D 40A 15 31.99 0.72% 608.83 608.60 RCP 40 DI-3B CG-6 8 615.50 VDOT STD IS-1 REQ'D 39 15 32.13 4.36% 608.50 607.10 RCP 38 DI-3C CG-6 4 612.83 VDOT STD. IS-1 REQ'D 37 15 28.53 0.53% 607.00 606.85 RCP 36 DI-3B CG-6 10 613.36 VDOT STD. IS-1 REQ'D 35 15 32.01 1.09% 606.75 606.40 RCP 34 DI-3BB CG-6 12 613.40 VDOT STD. IS-1 REQ'D 33 15 70.83 2.96% 600.50 598.40 RCP 32B DI-3B CG-6 10 602.69 VDOTSTD. IS-1 REQ'D 23A 15 31.97 0.78% 596.35 596.10 RCP 32 DI-3B CG-6 14 602.52 VDOTSTD. IS-1 REQ'D 31 15 42.42 1.18% 596.00 595.50 RCP 48 DI-3B. CG-6 12 579.34 VDOT STD. IS-1 REQ'D 47 15 11.23 4.08% 575.86 575.40 RCP 46 DI-3C CG-6 4 579.10 VDOT STD. IS-1 REQ'D 45 15 31.87 0.63% 575.30 575.10 RCP 44 DI-3B CG-6 10 579.11 VDOT STD. IS-1 REQ'D 43 15 15.32 0.65% 575.00 574.90 RCP 42 MH N/A N/A 579.67 VDOTSTD. IS-1 REQ'D 41 15 6.61 0.76% 574.80 574.40 RCP 52 RISER STIR N/A 30" 593.92 VDOT STD. IS-1 REQ'D 51 15 128.66 1.36%° 585.00 583,25 RCP 50 MH N/A N/A 592.00 VDOT STD. IS-1 REQ'D 49 15 150:55 4.05% 581.00 574,90 RCP W Z LU J/ LL F_ v) LU y F_,�/ ' J LU Q J < Q O � ® J Q W J I F U LU H w I i E3 d � r JOB NO. I 162126 SCALE 1'r=30' I II SHEET NO. 4 \TH OFF SIC FT R. COLLINS'Z U Lic. No. 035791.a 41 57 \ `- \ 58o- TREE PROTECTION FENCING (TYP.) 592. -� 560 `� \ / _- \ EXISTING TREES IN THIS AREATO REMAIN I --s80.LO 30 z . o IMITS OF TREE CLEARING (TYP.) �- \ \ _ ~� \ �� 0Cc a Eon e - - - - ---- - - ---- --� \ \ ��\\ 5$Oh\ \ -\� \ \ \n \� \ (I// U co - - \ in co rib o e \ _ — �� � � _ _— �N _ — �� � � {, _'�-\ y - _y A\ � �\ z LOT 5 �7 \ W�/ LOT i - - A \ \ \ -0 J� 6 G L 8 : 36 F 1I V - _ \ U P Y \ \ 00 b• o FENCING AND ARMORING x � 18 QP P _6�� — 24 O -AR A M • OPEN SPACE C!y' � \�� s 2 I 0 0.55 AC 1 " R - ° ,. _ , qp `' w , - ^-OW \ A \ \ zo � -AR _�1Q 1 i �— ICY) LU LOT 2 a A— N OPOI �� R � \\ �1 0 �'�'` L Tz� 6� 'LOT 33 \ — ��L� -$a6�° Q L T 34 6� ��� G v A Baas rexcr 0 a T I I N LOT ��ti� o CORRECT METHODS OF TREE FENCING I \ \ y _ OQ C \ \ C N 606 P �I 6OO o \ Q J / - / \ > II p o LO / H s �! �d� — W - �_ CL w o .ra. CORRECT TRUNK ARMORING (%) a \ W�( a LLI TRIANGULAR BOARD FENCE , County of Albemarle ar Conservation Plan Checklist -To be placed on Landscape Plans LO O 4J - - - \ `L9 e _ (Handbook, pp 1H-284-111-297 for complete specifications) a -I ,I_' '•� �_--_ _ , t,? . .. �� _ \\ �, \ / LU 3 ur 1. The YoBowing items shag be shown on the glen: \ \ • b o Q U Treesiobesaved; / \ \\ - -_ s { / s9 Y - L��yO� -- \ -�/ `— �` T N ® Lints of clearing (outside dripline of trees to be saved); CP j -` _ 1 ® Location and type of protective fencing, ,i I - t - L L U N O A I I/ ` \ '\ �/ -. \ / - HI o r. BE E _ 4 � � � v � c� C� ® Grade changes requiring tree wells or walla; -� - l,\ Proposed trenching or tmmeiing beyond the limits of clearing. �; •, >S LANE /x" I� 28 QPP-11 er 2. Markings: t-- ,_, - An 0 All trees to be saved shall be marked wilt print or ribbon at a height clearly visible tc equipment operators. �' ' S I 5 2 "• .� - 4 " ° — �� V • V LLJ I r I (f) p U No grading shall begin until the tree marking has been inspected and approved by a Couaty Inspector, C \ 3. Pre -Construction Conference: I Tree preservation and protection measures shall be reviewed with the contractor on site. 4. Eauiument Operation and Storage: ZI Heavy equipment, vehicular tragic and storage of construction materials including sed shall not be permitted within the driplines of trees to be saved 5. Soil Eresion and Stornoo ter Detention Devices: Ll Such devices shall not adversely affect trees to be saved.s: 6. Fire I Fires are not permitted within 100 feet of the dnpline of trees to be saved Tied, 7. Materials: ® Toxic materials shall not be stored within 100 feet of the dripline of frees to be saved. 8. Protective Fencing: El Trees to be retained within 40 feet of a proposed building or grading activity shall be protected by fencing. fl Forcing shall be in place and shall be inspected and approved by a County Inspector prior In grading or construction. 9. Tree Wells: ® When the ground level must be raised within the dripline of atree to be saved, a tree well shall be provided and a construction detail submitted for approval. 10. Tree Walls: ® When the ground level most be lowered within the dripline a tree to be saved, a tree wall shall be provided; and a construction detail submitted for approval. 11. Trenching and Tunneling: fl When trenching is required within the limits of clearing, it shall be done as far away from the bunks oftrees as possible. Tunneling under a large tree shall be considered as an alternative when it is anticipated that necessary trenching will destroy feeder roots. 12. Clearing: III Protective fencing shall be the last items removed during the final cleanup. 13, Damaged Trees: 0 Damage treesshel betreatedrmmedralalybypmmng,fefibzahonorothermethodsrecommendedbyatreespemabat N01E:ITIS HE DEVELOPER'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONFER WITH THE CONTRACTOR ON TREE CONSERVATION REQUIREMENTS. 4/19/17 CONTRACT PURCHASER SIGNATURE (DATE) 5/1106 Page I of I ?• Rl C ° - III - / A _ � A/ AV A F.— � O 5 �`58z\ �611 PROPOSED SWM ( \ \ z �Y FACILITY B / � v III _ OPEN SPACE B 7 \ _ LLI w _ J •� \\�V= TREES UP T04"{AL. SHALL BE STAKED W rV00z WITH 2-2"1 HARDWOOD STAKES. rs/ Z TREES OF 4" CAL. OR LARGER SHALL BE Aw \ III=� \ GUYED WITH3 EQUALLYSPACED,TWISTED, r^\\ Z J vl AND TURNBUCKLES. LOOP HOSE AROUND LU TRUNK. FLAG WIRES WITH COURVEY TAPECD - 1 J WITHRUBBER HOSE GAUGE WIRE ' I,/ `�✓ FURTHER INFORMATION NS FOR w WITH RUBBER HOSE &TURNBUCKLES I. V' r L.L Y z"xz HARDWOOD STAKE I111,I j LL < o "VVV VVV CUT& REMOVE BURLAP FROMTOP ` a 1/30F BALL AS SHOWN i \ , 6 V N /\ �- f �_ GUYWIRES WITH RUBBER HOSE AND Q s TURNBUCKLES z/; UP TREE O 3 SCARIFY SUBSOIL TO MIN. DEPTH M 411 CD MULCH SAUCER \ 2"x2"HARDWOOD STAKES, ALIGN N J FINISHED GRADE �� � U �/!h \� I TOP OF STAKES MULCH SAUCER C_ s \ i ' o TREES UPTO 4" CAL. SHALL BE STAKED- �'� h //�J I YI AMENDED SOIL MIX TREES 4" CAL. OR LARGER SHALL BE II I\ %AInI\� F- w AROUND TRUNK ABOVE BRANTWISTED, #12 GAUGE WIRE ICHE TH HOSE l�� � II !! U GUYED WITH 3 EQUALLY SPACED LU LU HT FTREE I— cc 2 p AS SHOWN, FLAG WIRES WITH d In -a III _�I COURVEYTAPE. REFER TO SPECS !—� CUT AND REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP I JOB NO. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. \ =T= 1/3 OF BALL AS SHOWN \ — AMENDEDSOILMIX — SCARIFY SUBSOILT04 MIN. DEPTH 162126 a \ � %� ---GRAPHIC SCALE it iI ��= —II=lI In=-IL—��I i1=Ti-III=11 I I /_ \ TTT COMPACTED SUBGRADE \ III III—� COMPACTED SUBGRADE SCALE o \ 30 0 15 30 —BO- — - 120 1 "=30' a \\\ ✓ Tree Planting and Staking Detail Evergreen Tree Planting Detail IN FEET) \ Not To Scale Not To Scale SHEET NO. -a 1 inch = 30 ft. - 15 L