HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB201900151 Staff Report 2020-08-21ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT
Project #/Name
ARB-2019-151: 29'" Place — Starbucks Building Renovation
ARB-2020-47: 291 Place Restaurant with a Drive-thru Window
Review Type
Amendment to an approved Certificate of Appropriateness/Building Permit Review
Parcel Identification
061M00012001C0
Location
1500 Seminole Trail
Zoned
Planned Development Shopping (PDSC), Entrance Corridor (EC)
Owner/Applicant
FR Shoppers World LLC c/o Federal Realty Investment Trust/Bohler (Ryan Yauger)
Magisterial District
Rio
Proposal
To renovate the building previously known as Shoppers World North to accommodate a change in location and to add a drive -through for Starbucks.
Context
The subject property is comprised of an existing commercial building that is associated with the overall 291 Place commercial development. This portion of Route 29 is
largely characterized by commercial development with nearby developments including Charlottesville Fashion Square Mall to the east, 291 Place to the southwest, and a
Jiffy Lube to the north. (Fig. 1)
Visibility
The proposed renovations will be readily visible from the Route 29 Entrance Corridor.
ARB Meeting Date
August 17, 2020
Staff Contact
Khris Taggart
PROJECT HISTORY
The ARB reviewed ARB-2001-041, a proposal for landscaping changes to this site, and a number of sign applications have been approved for the building. A pre -application conference was held to discuss the
proposed drive-thru on June 10, 2019. The ARB provided comments on the proposed landscape and building changes on June 1, 2020.
CHANGES TO THE PROPOSAL
The site layout and architectural design remains much as it was proposed in the initial site plan review and preliminary architectural review in May. Minor changes to the site layout and architectural design
include: 1) Landscaping has been revised, trees and shrubs have been added. 2) The color proposed for the vertical wood siding has been revised to Roycroft Pewter and is to extend to the brick column beneath. 3)
A walk-up window has been added near the southeast comer of the building.
2211 271U
10
02.?
AS
750
All
u- 4an ,.;ieotV
3
1 t'+
3U0
lJ :11t, ^�
]00`
2W
2113 _
200
W120X
2 5
21M
2211�
-
20V
210
01
2
151
1 150U i
1
800 •i
t1a�1�
905
b I'I 61-13"
q 0'IO
e 2101,
t "<>. ,
N-01-14 y, 1425
112 ' 61 M;-121 I/
61 -134
•off N A
Figure 1: Google Image (left) showing project area along the Rt. 29 Entrance Corridor and County GIS map (right) highlighting subject property.
ANALYSIS
61-129
6Y 1
533
1943
]s3z
Is 55 1535
1581
2565 1540
1577
1585 2572 1560
1564
1593 1576
1596
1611
1614 1616 ,
1621 1624 1580
-1629 1606
1630
1636
1638 / r
1639
,_\
IOr
REF
GUIDELINE
ACTIONS 6/1/2020
ISSUE 8/17/20
RECOMMENDATION
8/17/20
GENERAL GUIDELINES
Purpose; Conspatibifily with significant historic sues; Compatibility with the character of the Entrance Corridor; Structure Design
1
The goal of the regulation of the design of development within the designated
Revise the renovation design to
The color of the vertical wood siding that
Provide a physical
Entrance Corridors is to ensure that new development within the corridors reflects
incorporate architectural details, forms
is to cover portions of the fagade has
sample of the color
the traditional architecture of the area. Therefore, it is the purpose of ARB review
and colors that establish a cohesive
been revised to Roycroft Pewter, a gray
proposed for the vertical
and of these Guidelines, that proposed development within the designated
appearance for the existing building and
tone that is softer and lighter than the
siding for review.
Entrance Corridors reflect elements of design characteristic of the significant
compatibility with the surrounding site.
previously proposed black. The color
historical landmarks, buildings, and structures of the Charlottesville and
Consider the form and material for clear
renderings show the gray color to be
Albemarle area, and to promote orderly and attractive development within these
column support for the existing brick
compatible with the brick of the existing
2
corridors. Applicants should note that replication of historic structures is neither
and the proposed siding elements.
building and the color appears to be
required nor desired.
Consider a lighter alternative color for
the siding.
better coordinated with the surrounding
site. The color extends to the brick
2
Visitors to the significant historical sites in the Charlottesville and Albemarle area
experience these sites as ensembles of buildings, land, and vegetation. In order to
columns, which are to be painted, to
accomplish the integration of buildings, land, and vegetation characteristic of these
establish clear connection between the
sites, the Guidelines require attention to four primary factors: compatibility with
two. The color also better coordinates
significant historic sites in the area; the character of the Entrance Corridor; site
with the lighter wood siding proposed for
development and layout; and landscaping.
the drive -through window addition.
However, a physical sample of the color
3
New structures and substantial additions to existing structures should respect the
traditions of the architecture of historically significant buildings in the
proposed is needed for review to confirm
Charlottesville and Albemarle area. Photographs of historic buildings in the area,
coordination. The siding is now
as well as drawings of architectural features, which provide important examples of
illustrated with a frame or trim around it,
this tradition are contained in Appendix A.
which provides more of a finished
appearance.
4
The examples contained in Appendix A should be used as a guide for building
design: the standard of compatibility with the area's historic structures is not
intended to impose a rigid design solution for new development. Replication of the
The fagade has been revised to show a
design of the important historic sites in the area is neither intended nor desired.
walk-up window near the southeast
The Guideline's standard of compatibility can be met through building scale,
corner of the building. The window is
materials, and forms which may be embodied in architecture which is
minimal in nature and has little impact
contemporary as well as traditional. The Guidelines allow individuality in design
on the overall design.
to accommodate varying tastes as well as special functional requirements.
5
It is also an important objective of the Guidelines to establish a pattern of
compatible architectural characteristics throughout the Entrance Corridor in order
to achieve unity and coherence. Building designs should demonstrate sensitivity to
other nearby structures within the Entrance Corridor. Where a designated corridor
is substantially developed, these Guidelines require striking a careful balance
between harmonizing new development with the existing character of the corridor
and achieving compatibility with the significant historic sites in the area.
9
Building forms and features, including roofs, windows, doors, materials, colors
and textures should be compatible with the forms and features of the significant
historic buildings in the area, exemplified by (but not limited to) the buildings
described in Appendix A [of the design guidelines]. The standard of compatibility
can be met through scale, materials, and forms which may be embodied in
architecture which is contemporary as well as traditional. The replication of
important historic sites in Albemarle County is not the objective of these
guidelines.
12
Architecture proposed within the Entrance Corridor should use forms, shapes,
scale, and materials to create a cohesive whole.
10
Buildings should relate to their site and the surrounding context of buildings.
11
The overall design of buildings should have human scale. Scale should be integral
None.
The existing building design and
None,
to the building and site design.
proposed renovations have elements of
human scale.
13
Any appearance of "blankness" resulting from building design should be relieved
Revise the landscape plan to add back
The landscape plan has been revised to
None.
using design detail or vegetation, or both.
the two previously approved trees along
show two White Flowering Dogwoods
the north end of the building.
along the north end of the building.
14
Arcades, colonnades, or other architectural connecting devices should be used to
None.
There is an existing colonnade that
None.
unify groups of buildings within a development.
extends across the fagade and the
individual suites.
15
Trademark buildings and related features should be modified to meet the
None.
The new material choices may be current
None.
requirements of the Guidelines.
standards for Starbucks, but with the
existing building the renovation proposal
does not appear to create a trademark
design.
16
Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should not be highly tinted or highly
None.
The window glass is existing and
None.
reflective. Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should meet the following
window tint does not appear to be
criteria: Visible light transmittance (VLT) shall not drop below 40%. Visible light
proposed.
reflectance (VLR) shall not exceed 30%. Specifications on the proposed window
lass should be submitted with the applicationforfinal review.
Accessory structures and equipment
17
Accessory structures and equipment should be integrated into the overall plan of
None.
There are no accessory structures
None.
development and shall, to the extent possible, be compatible with the building
proposed, but a drive -up window
designs used on the site.
structure is proposed to be added on the
south elevation. The design and the
materials proposed in the drive -up
window structure are minimalistic and
compatible with the existing building.
Several drive -through related items
(menu board, canopy, etc.) are also
proposed, but they are located on the
west side of the building and are not
ex ected to be visible from the EC.
18 The following should be located to eliminate visibility from the Entrance Corridor
street. If, after appropriate siting, these features will still have a negative visual impact
on the Entrance Corridor street, screening should be provided to eliminate visibility.
a. Loading areas, b. Service areas, c. Refuse areas, d. Storage areas, e. Mechanical
equipment,
f. Above -ground utilities, and g. Chain link fence, barbed wire, razor wire, and
similar security fencing devices.
19 Screening devices should be compatible with the design of the buildings and
surrounding natural vegetation and may consist of. a. Walls, b. Plantings, and c.
Fencing.
Provide a roof plan and elevations that
show proposed roof -mounted
mechanical equipment and how that
equipment will be screened from the
EC.
A roof plan has been provided that
shows two proposed roof -mounted
mechanical units. One is aligned with an
existing row of equipment and the other
is to be closer to the southwest comer of
the building. The applicant has indicated
that the proposed mechanical equipment
will not be visible from the EC.
However, if the new equipment is as tall
as existing equipment, then there is
potential visibility from vantage points
further north on the EC. As illustrated, it
appears that new equipment will be
visible. Information showing how
visibility of new equipment will be
eliminated is needed prior to approval of
None.
20 Surface runoff structures and detention ponds should be designed to fit into the None. There are no new stormwater features None.
natural topography to avoid the need for screening. When visible from the Entrance proposed.
Corridor street, these features must be fully integrated into the landscape. They
should not have the aooearance of engineered features.
21
22-29
30-31
The following note should be added to the site plan and the architectural plan:
"Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be
Lighting
Guidelines for the Use of Decorative Landscape Lighting
The requirements of the Guidelines regarding landscaping are intended to reflect
the landscaping characteristic of many of the area's significant historic sites which
is characterized by large shade trees and lawns. Landscaping should promote
visual order within the Entrance Corridor and help to integrate buildings into the
existing environment of the corridor.
Add the standard mechanical equipment
note to the site and architectural plans.
tnarcate it any site or ouuamg-mountea
lighting is proposed with the
renovations to the site. If new lighting is
proposed, provide complete details.
Revise the plans to accurately show the
existing landscaping conditions.
Revise the landscape plan to show the
correct quantity of shade trees along the
EC that will not exceed the height of the
existing overhead lines.
The standard mechanical equipment note
has been added to the architectural
no new
this site.
There is no decorative lighting proposed
for this site.
The landscape plan has been revised to
better reflect the existing landscape
conditions. However, along the EC
frontage, it is difficult to judge the
appropriateness of proposed tree
locations because existing trees do not
appear to be shown with accurate canoe
Add the standard
mechanical equipment
None.
None.
Revise the landscape
plan to accurately show
the existing tree canopy
sizes for better
coordination with new
tree locations. Add trees
along the frontage to
8
Continuity within the Entrance Corridor should be obtained by planting different
sizes. The addition of plants (Knockout
achieve consistent
types of plant materials that share similar characteristics. Such common elements
Revise the landscaping plan to show
Rose and ornamental grass) to fill in the
spacing, approximately
allow for more flexibility in the design of structures because common landscape
interspersed ornamental trees along the
closed site entrance is a positive feature,
35' on center, including
features will help to harmonize the appearance of development as seen from the
EC.
but some plants are shown in the right-
north of the site entrance
street upon which the Corridor is centered.
of -way, and the overall frontage planting
that is to be closed.
still has an uncoordinated appearance.
Provide more than one
Revise the landscape plan to accurately
show the existing landscaping
The landscape plan has been revised to
species of tree to meet
the requirements for
32
Landscaping along the frontage of Entrance Corridor streets should include the
following:
conditions. Revise the proposed
show (6) Forest Pansy Redbud trees
shade and ornamentals.
a. Large shade trees should be planted parallel to the Entrance Corridor Street.
landscaping, if necessary, to coordinate
along the frontage. However, the spacing
Such trees should be at least 3% inches caliper (measured 6 inches above the
with the existing landscaping.
exceeds 35' in some places and the trees
ground) and should be of a plant species common to the area. Such trees should be
are ornamentals — not the required large
located at least every 35 feet on center.
shade trees. The smaller species may be
b. Flowering ornamental trees of a species common to the area should be interspersed
acceptable in this case due to potential
among the trees required by the preceding paragraph. The ornamental trees need not
conflicts with existing overhead lines
alternate one for one with the large shade trees. They may be planted among the large
located approximately 10' away.
shade trees in a less regular spacing pattern.
Maintaining a mix of trees along the
c. In situations where appropriate, a three or four board fence or low stone wall,
frontage would support a coordinate
typical of the area, should align the frontage of the Entrance Corridor street.
appearance along the larger corridor.
d. An area of sufficient width to accommodate the foregoing plantings and fencing
should be reserved parallel to the Entrance Corridor street, and exclusive of road
right-of-way and utility easements.
37
Plant species: a. Plant species required should be as approved by the Staff based
upon but not limited to the Generic Landscape Plan Recommended Species List
and Native Plants or Virginia Landscapes (Appendix D .
33
Landscaping along interior roads:
Revise the landscape plan to show two
The landscape plan has been revised to
None.
a. Large trees should be planted parallel to all interior roads. Such trees should be
trees to the west and two trees to the
show a total of four Forest Pansy trees
at least 2'/z inches caliper (measured six inches above the ground) and should be of
east of the site entrance from Berkman
east and west of the site entrance from
a plant species common to the area. Such trees should be located at least every 40
Drive.
Berkman Drive.
feet on center.
34
Landscaping along interior pedestrian ways:
None.
The proposal includes a change to the
None.
a. Medium trees should be planted parallel to all interior pedestrian ways. Such
striped crosswalk located south of the
trees should be at least 2% inches caliper (measured six inches above the ground)
building, but it provides no opportunities
and should be of a species common to the area. Such trees should be located at
for planting.
least every 25 feet on center.
35
Landscaping of parking areas:
Revise the landscape plan to show
The landscape plan has been revised to
Revise the landscape
a. Large trees should align the perimeter of parking areas, located 40 feet on
shrubs and ornamental trees along the
show 3 Japanese Snowbell trees in the
plan to show additional
center. Trees should be planted in the interior of parking areas at the rate of one
perimeter of the parking area located
planting area south of the drive -through
shrubs in the planting
tree for every 10 parking spaces provided and should be evenly distributed
south of the drive -through.
lane. Shrubs are shown north of the
area between the drive -
throughout the interior of the parking area.
drive -through lane at the patio and south
through lane and the 7-
b. Trees required by the preceding paragraph should measure 2% inches caliper
Revise the landscape plan to show
of the drive-thm lane and window. An
space parking area.
(measured six inches above the ground); should be evenly spaced; and should be
shrubs in the gaps along the parking
existing sanitary sewer easement runs
of a species common to the area. Such trees should be planted in planters or
area that fronts the EC.
through the planting area, so additional
medians sufficiently large to maintain the health of the tree and shall be protected
trees are not possible, but shrubs can
by curbing.
typically be planted in these easements
c. Shrubs should be provided as necessary to minimize the parking area's impact
without conflict, and they would be
on Entrance Corridor streets. Shrubs should measure 24 inches in height.
appropriate to offset the impacts of the
drive-thm lane and parking.
36
Landscaping of buildings and other structures:
Provide additional landscaping, such as
a. Trees or other vegetation should be planted along the front of long buildings as
shrubs, to integrate the drive -through
necessary to soften the appearance of exterior walls. The spacing, size, and type of
window and the queuing travelway into
Trees have been added along the queuing
such trees or vegetation should be determined by the length, height, and blankness
the overall site.
travelway north of the building helping
of such walls.
to integrate the drive -through and the
b. Shrubs should be used to integrate the site, buildings, and other structures;
queuing lane into the site.
dumpsters, accessory buildings and structures; "drive thm" windows; service
areas; and signs. Shrubs should measure at least 24 inches in height.
38
Plant health: The following note should be added to the landscape plan: "All site
None.
The note is present on the landscape
None.
plantings of trees and shrubs shall be allowed to reach, and be maintained at,
plan.
mature height; the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall be pruned
minimally and only to support the overall health of theplant."
Development paftern
Site Develo ment and layout
6
Site development should be sensitive to the existing natural landscape and should
None.
The site has been previously developed,
None.
contribute to the creation of an organized development plan. This may be
and the existing grading is not being
accomplished, to the extent practical, by preserving the trees and rolling terrain
significantly altered.
typical of the area; planting new trees along streets and pedestrian ways and
choosing species that reflect native forest elements; insuring that any grading will
blend into the surrounding topography thereby creating a continuous landscape;
preserving, to the extent practical, existing significant river and stream valleys
which may be located on the site and integrating these features into the design of
surrounding development; and limiting the building mass and height to a scale that
does not overpower the natural settings of the site, or the Entrance Corridor.
39
The relationship of buildings and other structures to the Entrance Corridor street
None.
The existing building is to remain
See landscape
and to other development within the corridor should be as follows:
parallel to the EC and the proposed
recommendations.
a. An organized pattern of roads, service lanes, bike paths, and pedestrian walks
alterations to the existing on -site
should guide the layout of the site.
circulation pattems remain organized.
b. In general, buildings fronting the Entrance Corridor street should be parallel to
the street. Building groupings should be arranged to parallel the Entrance Corridor
The existing site entrance on Route 29
street.
would be closed with this proposal and a
c. Provisions should be made for connections to adjacent pedestrian and vehicular
planting strip and sidewalk would be
circulation systems.
added to connect with the existing
d. Open spaces should be tied into surrounding areas to provide continuity within
sidewalk along Route 29.
the Entrance Corridor.
e. If significant natural features exist on the site (including creek valleys, steep
The site has been previously developed.
slopes, significant trees or rock outcroppings), to the extent practical, then such
Existing trees near the southeast comer
natural features should be reflected in the site layout. If the provisions of Section
of the building are proposed to be
32.5.2.n of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance apply, then improvements
removed to accommodate a portion of
required by that section should be located so as to maximize the use of existing
the drive -through travelway and an
features in screening such improvements from Entrance Corridor streets.
outdoor dining area.
f The placement of structures on the site should respect existing views and vistas
on and around the site.
Views are not expected to be negatively
impacted.
Site Grading
40
Site grading should maintain the basic relationship of the site to surrounding
None.
The existing topography is not being
None.
conditions by limiting the use of retaining walls and by shaping the terrain through
significantly altered. The proposed drive -
the use of smooth, rounded landforms that blend with the existing terrain. Steep cut or
through requires minimal grading.
fill sections are generally unacceptable. Proposed contours on the grading plan shall
be rounded with a ten -foot minimum radius where they meet the adjacent condition.
Final grading should achieve a natural, rather than engineered, appearance. Retaining
walls 6 feet in height and taller, when necessary, shall be terraced and planted to
blend with the landscape.
41
No grading, trenching, or tunneling should occur within the drip line of any trees or
Show areas designated for preservation
The plans have been revised to show
None.
other existing features designated for preservation in the final Certificate of
on the site plan. Maintain grading
areas designated for preservation and
Appropriateness. Adequate tree protection fencing should be shown on, and
outside the driplines of trees to remain.
tree protection fencing is coordinated
coordinated throughout, the grading, landscaping and erosion and sediment control
Show tree protection fencing on and
throughout the plans.
tans.
coordinated throughout the grading,
landscaping, and erosion and sediment
42
Areas designated for preservation in the final Certificate of Appropriateness
should be clearly delineated and protected on the site prior to any grading activity
control plans.
on the site. This protection should remain in place until completion of the
development of the site.
43
Preservation areas should be protected from storage or movement of heavy
equipment within this area.
44
Natural drainage patterns (or to the extent required, new drainage patterns) should
None.
The site has been previously graded.
None.
be incorporated into the finished site to the extent possible.
Drainage patterns are not changing.
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends the following as the primary points of discussion:
1. The revised architectural design: the gray color of the siding, the detailing of the siding, the treatment of the columns.
2. Visibility of rooftop equipment; appropriate screening.
3. Landscaping along the EC: Tree size and spacing.
4. Landscaping at the drive -through.
Staff recommends approval with the following revisions:
1. Provide a physical sample of the color proposed for the vertical siding for review.
2. Add the standard mechanical equipment note to the site plan.
3. Revise the landscape plan to accurately show the existing tree canopy sizes for better coordination with new tree locations. Add trees along the frontage to achieve consistent spacing, approximately 35' on
center, including north of the site entrance that is to be closed. Provide more than one species of tree to meet the requirements for shade and ornamentals.
4. Revise the landscape plan to show additional shrubs in the planting area between the drive -through lane and the 7-space parking area.
ATTACHMENT
1. 29" Place Drive-thru Site Plan and Architectural Drawings
TABLE A
This report is based on the following submittal items:
Sheet #
Drawing Name
Drawing Date/Revision Date
C-100
Cover Sheet
6/18/2020
C-101
General Notes
6/18/2020
C-102
General Notes and Legend
6/18/2020
C-202
Existing Conditions and Demolition Plan
6/18/2020
C-301
Site Plan
6/18/2020
C-302
Sight Distance Profiles
6/18/2020
C-401
Grading Plan
6/18/2020
C-501
Utility Plan
6/18/2020
C-601
Landscape Plan
6/18/2020
C-602
Landscape Notes and Details
6/18/2020
C801
Construction Details
6/18/2020
C802
Construction Details
6/18/2020
C-803
Maintenance of Traffic Plan
6/18/2020
ARB-A-101
Floor Plan
3/16/2020
ARB-A-102
Roof Plan
6/23/2020
ARB-A-201
Elevations
6/23/2020
Proposed Elevations — Building N
7/27/2020
Existing Conditions — Elevation
Rendering of Walkup Window
Starbucks Floor Plan
Page 1
Existing Overall Plan
6/24/2020
Page 2
Proposed Overall Plan
6/24/2020
Page 3
Enlarged Overall Plan
6/24/2020
Page 4
Proposed Overall Plan with Existing Overlay Red
6/24/2020
R