HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUB202000141 Review Comments Preliminary Plat 2020-09-08�IRCI, �1\P
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memorandum
To: Scott Collins
From: Megan Nedostup- Principal Planner
Division: Planning Services
Date: September 8, 2020
Subject: SUB2020-141 Brookhill BI 16-17 Preliminary Subdivision Plat
The Planner for the Planning Services Division of the Albemarle County Department Community
Development will recommend approve the plan referred to above when the following items
have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been
identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based
on further review.) [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle
County Code.]
Requirements:
1. See attached direction from the Post Master regarding group mailboxes. Please
coordinate location with the Poster Master.
2. [COD page 24] Provide landscaping at the base or top of all the retaining walls to
integrate walls into the site and help reduce the massing.
3. Easements and deeds are needed for landscaping, retaining walls that cross lots, etc
4. The chart on sheet 3 does not have any of the "proposed" totals. Revise the chart to
include proposed totals to see how requirements of the COD are tracking.
5. [COD page 22] A civic space is required in either Blocks 16, 17 or 18. Indicate on the plan
which block these amenities will be provided
6 Tract connection to the Greenway trails
Eastern Park —
30,000 SF
Block 16, Block 17,
1 The Eastern park civic area may be
Civic Space #3
and/or Block 18
located in one location, or divided
between multiple locations (min
10,000 sf size) within the Eastern
portion of the development
2 Outdoor meeting area and/or plaza
3 Tot lot playground area (6,000 sf min )
4 Active open recreational grass area
6. Layout for these blocks do not align with the submittal for Block 18. There is an entrance
shown on this plan that is not shown on the other submittal. Coordinate plans. Please
keep in mind that the block length for these blocks cannot exceed 700 feet.
7. [COD- relegated parking] The units are not meeting the relegated parking of 3' setback
of the garage from the front of the unit, revise to meet this requirement. This will also
be required at building permit stage.
a. The final plat will need to contain the Garage and Driveway Exhibit
shown on page 30 of the Code of Development.
8. [COD- Neighborhood streets] Show where the parking is located on the streets. This can
be shown on the road plan, as opposed to the plat.
9. [COD -Polo Grounds Buffer] Additional landscaping is needed to the east side of Eustis
Ave adjacent to Polo Grounds road within the 30' buffer. Provide the required
landscaping.
10. [ZMA Application Plan] Trails are shown on the application plan within these blocks on
the other side of the stream. Have these trails been built? Provide these trails on the
plat per the application plan.
11. [ZMA Application Plan] A 10' multi -use trail that connects to Montgomery Ridge is
shown in this area. Provide that trail, or documentation from Montgomery Ridge that
the trail is not wanted. Also, if not extended all the way to Montgomery Ridge, it should
be provided to the property line along Polo Grounds Rd.
12. [COD- Block length] The block within Block 16 is longer than 700 feet. Revise to meet the
requirement of the Code of Development for a max of 700 feet.
13. [COD- preserved slopes] All the preserved slopes should be within open space/green
space. Adjust lots 68, 69, and 18 so that the preserved slopes are not within the lots.
14. [14-311] Please submit a separate road plan application for all new streets proposed
with this subdivision. The road plans must be reviewed and approved prior to final
plat approval.
15. [14-302 (A)(7)] Show the existing lot line of the parent parcel. The parcel should be
labeled with the tax map parcel number, the existing acreage, and the deed book
and page number of the most recently recorded plat.
a. On all other drawings, show the residual lot lines of the parent tracts with a label
stating the tax map parcel number, the proposed acreage following subdivision,
and the deed book and page number of the most recently recorded plat.
Recommendations:
16. It is recommended that street trees be adjusted to allow for consistency in spacing,
centered on islands, and overall design, see attached sheets.
17. It is recommended that additional species be added for the street trees so that there
is not just one species provided. If there happens to be a disease or insect that kills
the type of tree provided in the future, this will prevent the removal and
replacement of all street trees. It will also provide for a variety of look and color.
18. Sugar maples should be replaced with another species when located close to
sidewalks. These trees have shallow roots and will cause damage to sidewalks.
Please contact Megan Nedostup at the Department of Community Development 296-5832 ext.
3004 for further information.
LOT zB /\ \ \ /\' rr r l r ;
PROPOSED LIMITS OF CLEARING (TYR / , LOTz6 \`� ' I I \\ / / /.` ' ^\MA-rrui iNE SEE SHEET 8
/r / d LANDSCAPING NOTES:
-_�� ,, \ \ / / \ �`� d /' �\ \ / /� \ / / ' {,'/ ' / �• i LARGE STREET TREE PROVIDED EVERY So' OF STREET FRONTAGE.
\ LOT B STREET TREES SHALL BE LOCATED S' MIN. FROM DRAINAGE STRUCTURES AND 2d MIN.
LOT / / I // / 4 FROM WATERLINE AND SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURES.
\\ `� i/ + LOT i9 \ / \ 3/ + ' , / /
OPEN / /,i \ �\, s \ \ \ / ` / , 3. STREETTREES SHALL BE ALLOWED TO REACH, AND BE MAINTAINED AT, MATURE HEIGHT;
SPACE / , / / ALL LANDSCAPING WITHIN THE STREET \ \ / G( i / / THE TOPPING OF TREES IS PROHIBITED. STREET TREES SHALL BE PRUNED MINIMALLY AND
LOTiS 5 \ / / �, / / 3 ONLY TO SUPPORT THE OVERALL HEALTH OF THE PLANT.
RIGHT-OF-WAYS SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE " ` J /
• / � , / ` �� � � ` � \ \ � / t / �\ \ \ 4. STREET TREES LOCATED WITHIN INTERSECTION SIGHT DISTANCE TRIANGLES SHALL BE
\ / h ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY \\ �\ \ / / / \��\ / PRUNED BETWEEN 2'AND 7'ABOVE GROUND AS A CLEAR ZONE TO PRESERVE SIGHT LINES
FOR A STRUCTURE IN BLOCKS i6 & z7." , \ \ \ AND ACCOMMODATE PEDESTRIANS.
/5. TOTAL STREET FRONTAGE =10,
I REQUIRED STREET TREES: 219 (z TREE PER EVERY So' OF STREET FRONTAGE)
/ �z / 5 \ h toT47 % PROPOSED STREET TREES: 222
/// 4) OS STREET TREE
AL \ NOTE: 4,276 OF STREET FRONTAGE ALONG EUSTIS AVENUE (PORTION OF)
/ c
LOTz4 > / / i LOT zo LOT34 ONG ROAD D
/ � •• ) / REQUIRED STREET TREES: 86
PROPOSED STREET TREES:86
NOTE:163z' OF STREET FRONTAGE ALONG ROAD A
PROPOSED GREENWAY (TYP.
REQUIRED STREETTREES:33
PROPOSED STREETTREES:33
PQ NOTE: z 3zo' OF STREET FRONTAGE ALONG ROAD B
( ) ` / / � � \� � � / z / ,i / � � � \\\> � \ L0T33 // + / . , • •' � REQUIRED STREET TREES: 47
/ LOT13 / ; NOTE PROPOSED
8' OF STD EET FRONTAGE ALONG ROAD C
n / / / / \ i a F /! / \\ H�RpgO �r'', + REQUIRED STREETTREES:9
LOT
i /\ / /• \ _ �1 \ \,' FIR
OPOSEDSTREETTREES:9
/ \ ` ' / + + / h \ \ ' LOT
FUTURE PUBLIC GREENWAYTO BE / NOTE: 1g1' OF STREET FRONTAGE ALONG ROAD D
- / r„ / / / I \\ \ i / / / / \ / / REQUIRED STREET TREES: 4
DEDICATED TO ALBEMARLE COUNTY /'' ` �� LOTz i I \ \ / \ ` 3 \ PROPOSED STREETTREES: 4
ATTIME OF FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT, j O // 3 I \ / \ L073z
/, pP - I I I L07 u \ \ / / / �\ (TYP' + NOTE: 813' OF STREET FRONTAGE ALONG ROAD E
PER PROFFER #z OF ZMA2ox800011 a / / \ / / \ \ : \ i / - / 7 REQUIRED STREET TREES:17
LOT zz / i' / Q� �' III \ \ / / (47)QS STREETTREE 3/
ALON R AD, \ / \ \ i +A' PROPOSED STREET TREES:17� NOTE: 1,287'OF STREET FRONTAGE ALONG ROAD F
mo Jmh� REQUIRED STREETTREES: 26
, LOT4g ✓ r + • PROPOSED STREET TREES:z6
_,' qa \ � �� / / /\ \ LOT3a / \\ // LANDSCAPINGCALCS: / / 3 �PROPO§EDLANDSCAPE \ BLOCKS a6 &7 9 AC
i 28.z MAINTENANCE EASEMENT, / \ \\ \ / / / T� \ /
3
��`''� GREENWAY - z. o AC
W ; l 3 /l / l i'' ,� \� \ a \ ///•• / 3 + / a / \ \ \ \ / + POLO GROUNDS ROAD BUFFER - 0.12 AC
XISTING too -YEAR
f \ \ / / \
LOT 24 / / i \ s \ � / � , L073o , // / \ \ LOT 4y � , \/ EXISTING MANAGED TOTAL: 25.87 AC
STEEP SLOPES (TYP.
/ P PROPOSED LANDSCAPE/ 3/- 'X\ \ /
3 TOTAL AREA OF DEVELOPMENT FOR LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS: 25.87 AC
MAINTENANCE EASEMENT\\` 5 5. 7 3•
__ /I/ \ \ + REQUIRED LANDSCAPING: > �/a OF z 8 AC = 88 AC
..I• � a � 1 =1 � I /i\ _ -� l / � � / i ^ � l i , ` �\ �i/ + / ' / \ \ \ � / � O � EXISTING STREAM (TYP. /
Lorne `\ / / / / \ \ \ / / �`��pP / EXISTING TREE CANOPY OUTSIDE OF GREENWAY TO REMAIN: 71,591 SF =1.64 AC
/ LOTzo I it I \LOT 29 / \` L0T43 rr / PROPOSED LANDSCAPING: 97,115 SF = 2.24 AC
/ TOTAL: 3.88 AC
V (TYP•
I - ._ � � � LOT 27 / /\ \ � i/ / ./ QOP \ \ \ / / fV pap 0^'
NHD (TYP. / q?
p# OP OSFp0,11)
p O\\/LOTyx W _I_
y I i iI I N ( 4 PVe� �B</oRO oq�°
LOT a `� + • / \ /
S
r
y I i g I I " ; i\ R' A LOT z8
' • �. � 3 - { `. / LOT 41 `� � / '
(TYP. /
(9) QS STREET THE
I I \ 1 ALONG ROAD C `� •L / ``i \\ \� i / / + II_ f
LOT00,
I
LOT 40
PROPERTY BOUNDARY (TYP.)
OPEN SPACE
100.
\\ ROPERT BOUNDARY (TYP.)' 1 ' ' \ ` / / LOT \ \ 3 /
�i LOT 7 A V A , �•. �i ' / V A 39 `, J�, .� +00,
PLANT SCHEDULE:
SYMBOL
BOTANICAL NAME
COMMON NAME
I SIZE
1QUANTITY1
CANOPY
I TOTAL
CANOPY TREES
ASL
ACER SACCHARUM'LEGACY'
LEGACY' SUGAR MAPLE
2-1/2" cal.
1 15
1 195
2925
NS
NYSSA SYLVATICA
BLACK GUM
2-1/2" cal.
15
123
1845
UAP
ULMUS AMERICANA TRINCETON'
PRINCETON' ELM
2-1/2" cal.
19
397
7543
QS
QUERCUS SHUMARDII
SHUMARD OAK
2-1/2'. cal.
222
329
73038
UNDERSTORY TREES
CC
CERCIS CANADENSIS
EASTERN REDBUD
6' ht.
34
124
4216
CFAS
CORNUS FLORIDA'APPALACHIAN SPRING'
APPALACHIAN SPRING' DOGWOOD
6' ht.
30
124
3720
JV
JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA
EASTERN REDCEDAR
4-5'ht.
12
16
192
MV
MAGNOLIA VIRGINIANA
SWEET BAG MAGNOLIA
6' ht.
21
113
2373
PT
PINUSTAEDA
LOBLOLLYPINE
4-5'ht.
9
207
1863
SHRUBS
IGS
ILEX GLABRA'SHAMROCK'
SHAMROCK' INKBERRY
24" min.
385
1GO
JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA'GREYOWU
GREYOWL'JUNIPER
24" min.
281
NHD
NANDINA DOMESTICA'HARBOUR DWARF'
HARBOUR DWARF' NANDINA
24" min.
287
PAT
PEROVSKIAATRIPLICIFOLIA
RUSSIAN SAGE
24" min.
52
TOTAL
97715
SCOTT R.
C0LLINS7
Lic. No.
035791
z
O
a k
Z L ca
O
O Z n
Z J
oOf
a
V, w
Lu
ce
o
0
Q
Lu r
ri
M
Z M
z
u
v
CA
o
N
H
°
M
°
s
i
�I
v
O
N
0M
Cy)
W
o
W N
Z
9
N
C� \ (33) QS STREET TREE \
ALONG ROAD A + • , / ' , s / PROPOSED SWM FACILITY +; W
0 :__,,, ','
O m '� \✓ / /� / ' \ � j, � � 5 �/C\ \ \ CC TYP- , }� ' , / • O � / J � �
MATCHLINE - SEE THIS SHEE
y
p.�, LLI a
EXISTING PRESERVED \ / s j 5 // �\ \ i : • { / / J��`�OP ~ ~ °
TEEP SLOPES (Ti J CD
Lu
Vt)r I, �/30\
/UAP//(TYP. U
OPEN \ \ 4/ / s \ b • /� / P
PROPOSED LIMITS OF CLEARING PAC � � �� %/ , \ 3 \\ L0T35
PROPOSED GREENWAY (TYP. '� \\s \ ��.' / \ \ ` \ \ \\ CGS p / / / 1 PROPOSED GREENWAY (TYP.) ��j�-��J / z v
i
yri
06
�
O \\ ,,pOs,PO \\\ I a
LALONG
QSSTISAVENEE / / '' ^^
/ ��\- EUSTIS AVENUE 411
z OQ Ct CR (86) CIS STREET TREE - `/'/ �• - �/�
Oq0 / +.' ALONG EUSTIS AVENUE / - LLI V) w
'd "� � • z
Conservation Plan Notes: \ \ / / Lora \ \M /, / Y 3 + Z
elf 1.ALL TREES TO BE PRESERVED AND PROTECTED SHALL BE MARKED WITH PAINT OR RIBBON \ \Cv O
AT A HEIGHT CLEARLY VISIBLE TO EQUIPMENT OPERATORS. NO LAND DISTURBING X <' ,' 'T:�\ + ROPERTYBOUNDARY(TYP.) // 4 % , // �� Z
ACTIVITY SHALL BEGIN UNTIL THE TREE MARKING HAS BEEN INSTALLED BY THE `y
CONTRACTOR AND INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. / \; �.� \ `✓ +% / / `' I IQ� �.j I / /•'. •I J O
2. HEAVY EQUIPMENT, VEHICULAR TRAFFIC, AND THE STORAGE OF CONSTRUCTION \ \ ` /// LOTz`✓ / 0 v
MATERIALS AND SOIL SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED WITHIN THE OUTSIDE DRIPLINE OF THE-_. \ \ / �`/ \/ -a / / // I I ,',O -- +/ /.+,.•: J Li o
TO BE PRESERVED AND PROTECTED. - / ,/ , \ �'� ,- / EXISTING PRESERVED >
i i\ - ,/- I O T • J v
3. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURED AND/OR PERMANENT STORM WATER STEEP SLOPES (TYP.) \ /< .'// ' \ / / �. fit. - J o
MANAGEMENT FACILITIES LOCATIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED SUCH THAT THEY SHALL \ `� / , `�� 6 3' + '/ / _ o
NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT TREES TO BE PRESERVED AND PROTECTED. /` .\ \ i'+\ / / �- - 13 / . - /• ' ' , ' {I rrQnn
4. FIRES SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED WITHIN 100 FEET OF THE OUTSIDE DRIPLINE OF TREES \ "' i ' LOTz / — " / / I O V '
TO BE PRESERVED AND PROTECTED. \ % / / a/ / W / ASL(TYP- 0 O + / O
u
5. TOXIC MATERIALS SHALL NOT BE STORED WITHIN 100 FEET OF THE OUTSIDE DRIPLINE OF \ ,� / / \ 0� s / - • . . • . v
TREES TO BE PRESERVED AND PROTECTED. \ // # / / PAT(TYPPROPERT BOUNDARY ' 11 / / O N O w
6. NO LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY SHALL BEGIN UNTIL THE TREE PROTECTIVE FENCING HAS \ \ r/ / / i \ S �Yp \ . _ . _ _
BEEN INSTALLED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE COUNTY \ �/ / / / _ \ , / / O
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. / / -� \ \� + �/ O w o
7. WHEN TRENCHING FOR ANY KIND OF UNDERGROUND WATER, SEWER, ELECTRICAL, CABLE, 3 / W 0 /• �, • G M�M v
TELEPHONE, OR OTHER UTILITY SERVICE IS NECESSARY WITHIN THE LIMITS OF TREE / +• I ' y / / _ .'.�' • w W E
PROTECTION OR BEYOND THE LIMITS OF CLEARING, THE SEPARATION FROM THE TRUNKS / : -- �;±, , 0
\
OF TREES SHALL BE MAXIMIZED TO THE FURTHEST EXTENT POSSIBLE. TUNNELING SHALL O
- •� /'
BE REQUIRED WHEN DEEMED, BY THE COUNTY ENGINEER, THAT TRENCHING WILL r/ rn
SIGNIFICANTLY DAMAGE FEEDER ROOTS OF TREES TO BE PRESERVED AND PROTECTED. / / - _ w w w O V / �• • I JOB NO. y
B. ANY DAMAGE TO THE CROWN, TRUNK, OR ROOT SYSTEM OF ANY TREE TO BE / / � �� / I . • • • • • • • • " • • • o
SEDSWMFACILITY / w .._.�! _ _ ICgZ�SO o
PRESERVED AND PROTECTED SHALL BE REPAIRED IMMEDIATELY, IN ACCORDANCE WITH + + � / _
THE PRACTICES IN THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL HANDBOOK, CARE FOR SERIOUS / / RAPHIC SCALE — _ PT p• _ • ' ` ' _ ' N
INJURIES SHALL BE PRESCRIBED BY A PROFESSIONAL FORESTER OR TREE SPECIALIST. - / / �_—� ---( ` �` SCALE °
___�_
_
SOILS WHICH HAVE BEEN COMPACTED,
OOT ZONES OF
EES TO BE
9 MOVEVERY ED BACK "OVER THENROOCHOOLoTHE BA04HS LOBE DRIVENR12" DEEP AND CHLI -LSE T S EET JV(TYP PDXOGR GROUNDS i � \`\ �/ '�� 1° 4��
0 o zo o so
AND
PRESERVED AND PROTECTED, SHALL BE AERATED BY PUNCHING HOLES WITH AN IRON —
+ OU
°
STING pUBLIC ROAD
4D -- .. - _ O SHEET NO. o
10. TREE PROTECTIVE MEASURES SHALL BE THE LAST OF THE TEMPORARY EROSION / / ( IN FEET) VAR' WIDTHPUBLi�g�y ��
CONTROL PLAN MEASURES REMOVED DURING THE FINAL CLEAN-UP. ; / 1 inch = 40 ft. - ` �- O 17 m
r
5 •.
DOUBLE STRAND #22 GAUGE WIRE - • -�- s -�--s —s /• .. . • j j jy
WITH RUBBER HOSE & TURNBUCKLES +I I — �f• r� • • • —s _s�•'/_'�`—�- •-.'�' •' • `
R"xz' HARDWOOD STAKE ' • 'J ..��-��--�s ���-•�• `• �� \ • . • • • • • • • • J' _ -
�5 /
CUT& REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP .-
213OFBALL ASSHOWN / • �� O /
/
w �/
SCARIFY SUBSOIL TO 4'MIN. DEPTH - - u
• 5 • • • • / PROPOSED LIMITS OF CLEARING (TYP.)
MULCH SAUCER + j O PROPERTY BOUNDARY (TYP.
--/ LL
FINISHED GRADE
TREES UP T04x CAL. SHALL BE STAKED, •, ���0�- - - - - O ��/ - - 1)/y,/
TREES 4' CAL. OR LARGER SHALL BE
GUYED WITH 3 EQUALLY SPACED FUTURE PUBLIC GREENWAYTO BE Y
TWISTED,#u GAUGE WIRE WITH HOSE DEDICATED TO ALBEMARLE COUNTY
AND TURNBUCKLES. LOOP HOSE v PROPOSED GREENWAY (TYP _
AROUND TRUNK ABOVE BRANCHES AT TIME OFFINALSUBDIVISIONPLAT, ! \
AS SHOWN, FLAG WIRES WITH PER PROFFER #2 OF ZMA201800021 w w \\
COURVEYTAPE. REFERTO SPECS
FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, i EXISTING PRESERVED
STEEP SLOPES (TYP.) /
AMENDED SOIL MIX
COMPACTED SUBGRADE - w w r—� \
w W y W W W J• w 1 1 ; J, _ / "� ` \ \ \ LOT zoo \ '-
Tree Planting and Staling Detail PROPOSED GREENWAY (TYP.) S / / \ LOT 30 3
' 1
w w -
Not To Scale ,�� \/ 1\ \\ �\ \ \\ N TE: N6 S REETTR ES PROPOS DIN THIS AREA
LOT zoz TO ALLOW FOR A FUTURE BLOCK 28 ENTRANCE 3-
�`\ \ -
v
—/
LOT am
LOT 99
LOT 95
• \ % `// \ \ \ - 11 I LOT96 I I I Lo7g7 iI I I (26) CIS STREET TREE
OPE \ \ \- ` I
SPAC \ \ LOTg; \ I I it I II iI I I - - ALO G ROAD F `' \ s \ ' P F 0.0p0- w`
\ \ � � tZ0 1c /
j. • . ' . • I\ \ \ / / \ \ " _ _ I \ -I I - II - 't - \ s P°SiO OVTGRI•N 3 '' `) LOT 59CFA5 P.
/PR° \ 4T(TYP. 3
-.-')- 1• ! \ \\ \� � / X \ - I I _-- s� � 1 s /w j/w �' 1 \1 \ _ - \ � \ \�
/
(86)OSSTREET TREE_
\ s x
x - \ t ,
\ \ \ \ ' ALONG EUSTIS AVENUE' I,
\ .l•". �' LOT gx I I / - �— - _W� .. i \ 11 LOT82
•• `•. r. I rr l `- W-W�_vr`--W "� / / \ \ 1`\ \ } 1 X \`II \\ LOT58 1`� �\I I! 1 1 ; I.
1 _ IJ
Q w / - - w'— ""�"-W ^\ \ \ = I !NIS(TYP.)
LOT 83 LOTPT (TYP.) I
PROPOSED LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCEE" I"
ASEM NT�T84 \ \ \ PROPOSEDLANDSCAPE \ x ' I LOT57 ;
1, ) \
MAINTENANCE EASEMENT I 1 JV (TyP.)1� 1
.�•':'� \ y/ /\• + ' /----- II I I LOT 86 I I I LOT85
LOT87
�. .•. I // �i I II--_____'
L0T8o
1 \v1�',I
\ LOT go J LOT 89 I f, i / _ _ _ - III O I �I 11 LOT 56
• � •s `•� / \\<� ! I IJ II I `_ ��I" ----� --- I I----- i i
,��0 •. \ \ \\�../ / / I ,�. I_ i // ._______•I I III I i I I I I ---- I l 05av L 1-1--`----I II
"rFr
'\L- _ \\ I ------- II I I I I I o -- -MV_(TYP. 79 Q_EXISTING MANAGED 0� \
STEEP SLOPES (TYP.) �� ' \ \ \\ i I ------- i -------
EXISTING 2oo-YR FLOODPLAIN (TYP. LOT SS CC(TYP.
1 I
LOT 73
LOT 74 LOT 75
I
LOT 72 \ \ \ \ I I
Ali LOT 76 LOT 77 I I I ix - -'•r_ � L I
/ PROPOSEDLANDSCAPE - s k
i I — — -MAINTENANCE EASEMENT i (y7) STREETTREE
FUTURE PUBLIC GREENWAY TO BE XISTING STREAM (TYP.) a i 0-ALONG ROAD B i I\
DEDICATED TO ALBEMARLE COUNTY
_ _ Lor76
LOT 54
AT TIME OF FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT, � / /, \ \ ' x �` s _ _ _ ) — _ I I I I I III UAp (TYP.
PER PROFFER #2OFZMAzoi8000i2 \ I /<' LOT72
ROAD WW
=_-----I 3
• ,,, , w PROPOSED PUBLIC ROAD _ - I
54'PUBLIC RJW -
ROPOSED GREENWAY - Wes--.W I i Ii
� - -
v , . ( ) i I i i TYP. ��,���JJJ \� i -1• - w \ I _— I( * 5 kT k �. � I I 1` k
LOT 70
W -1' V 1• _I
r \ I 3
s j
/:1.- ��\ w lam_ _ - I// Y•. ' I j7 I IjI L0T64
L0IL_ 1 il1
T6 LOT II I/ - - �, _ LOT f
ROPERTYBOUNDARY(TYPJ\ \\ \ // i I I l i L076 J _ I 1- I 1 3 i - I
—
NHD (TYP.
w(27)OSSTREETTREE
\ / AL NGROA_ DE
SOPEN PACE LOT6g
\ \ \ \ I rh _ � ! / J I J
10101 GRAPHIC SCALE \ \ \ ` ' - _ I / " LOT63 / " I IG (TYP. T
k,
so
PROPOSED LANDSCAPE11`y�
_ \ \ MA NTENANCEEASEMENT /
' ( IN FEET)
1 inch = 40 ft. \ \ OPEN
EXISTING PRESERVED \� \ SPACE // / ! 3 N / LOT5o JG07(FJYP I'
/ - STEEPSLOPES(TYP.) \\ \ \,\` LOT62
+ PROP
BOU
v / ✓! � / NdTE: NO STREET TREE�ROPOSEDINTHISAREA I
/bo/ / i \ / / / i ) TO ALLOW FOR A F TURE BLOCK 28 ENTRANCE
I / ."\ ` LOTz7 i �' / r v A / LOT62 / / / h / / LOT 4g s 17 /
/
LOT sa
`\ LOTi6 J YVI&CHLINE - SEE SHEET 17 /7'
PROPOSED LIMITS OF CLEARING (TYP.) \ I \ /
LOT 48 , 3
I OPEN
SPACE OPEN
SPACE
NOTE: ALL LANDSCAPING WITHIN THE STREET
RIGHT-OF-WAYS SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE
ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
FOR A STRUCTURE IN BLOCKS 16 & 17."
Evergreen Tree Planting Detail
Not To Scale
1992
TREES UP TO 4" CAL. SHALL BE STAKED
WITH x-x"xz' HARDWOOD STAKES.
TREES OF 4"CAL. OR LARGER SHALL BE
GUYED WITH 3 EQUALLY SPACED, TWISTED,
AND TURNBUCKLES. LOOP HOSE AROUND
TRUNK. FLAG WIRES WITH COURVEY TAPE.
REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION
GUYWIRE5 WITH RUBBER HOSE AND
TURNBUCKLES 213 UP TREE
z"xx" HARDWOOD STAKES, ALIGN
TOP OF STAKES
MULCH SAUCER
AMENDED SOIL MIX
CUT AND REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP
113 OF BALL AS SHOWN
SCARIFY SUBSOIL TO 4" MIN. DEPTH
COMPACTED SUBGRADE
FENCING AND ARMORING
, J•' J
p N
1111 a
RNRO rEx[T ��1.�
t1-_ �— corzn acxcE
R� numE r[u¢
CORRECT METHODS OF TREE FENCING
ram+ CORRECT TRUNK ARMORING
TRIANGULAR BOARD FENCE
Source: Va. DSWC
111 - 401
338
Plate 3.38-2
( eunh of \Ilwmarle
1'nmen xhon flan Clwchli,l To he played on Llmlceape flan,
llPnnm�mA, pp HI 2" 111 x97W,.pkO,peafi.im,)
I. I he toliewl.x ltenn stall be shown on the ulan
8] tremmhe n,M
10 I.Ilmmofde. ("i&dnpllneofhemtobamvM,,
0 LowuauaM type of pn+lc:bva �mnng.
a GMedlatlges tequwlg tree well, nr waW.
0 Pmpcaod trencNng mtwmding hcynnd the linula of cloenng,
S. marm."
10 All IwWo re waM andl be ma %ithpnntmnbbar atahaghlclmmlyvbl,kw"pmemopw .
O Nn grwl g,lwll log I wlllha trw mmh;;g hm bwllwtM mdeppmvM b)e('mtnry lmpw:tm.
a. Pre-C nd a1
Q 9 p 'u ,uJpl«tau'. nemurta aAWl lv rewexedwM W<awrcw.m ml wte
w Fwal.m t0 t na st«.�
13
Ih 1 1 e ehirnld rcxlFc enA wnnpe rf esmwrwmn mnlsxlx rchxhng wnl xlwll nrl be perminM within the Mplinm of tmm
lob d
S son 1.,. t e Yt .try OetwHnn llnien
0 Such dedtte rhdl nd edvardy eRea trma to be,«M.
F 1'tres:
fl Fnvs ore not pemtmedmWn100 feet oft&dnpllne of lremmbe wveM1
7. T," M.trrl.h:
0 Tavo rtwtatd„hall no16e nnmd wtbm , W Yed oftMdnPlire of hma m & wrM
IT pnl«tN. Fa.�In.:
0 I'rem to b<rdaned xaW n a0 feet of a prcposM balding or graatnR xo,iry shall be ptde<ted by fmcmg
� F.ndng,hdl MinplxcwM lbein,pmM.dapp,m� byaCoutgl..peaeaplimtogra ,,g w., u an.
f. Tr«Nd6:
® W9 Ih ! MI vd Imd lw lmaM witl' IIe14ipllne "fx hee mhe drval xuee welldWlb 1 idal nndxa m Ii�xl dddl
rub®ved for appc d.
Is. rr« W J
0 When Iha gr wl Id el mI,I he IuwdM ithn the dnplim a tree m M1e ra+M urce call sisal be pn.vidM:. and a mn m lion Adulil
ERTY miuMr Ipr A
NDARY (TYP.) 11• 1`,,a l d T II.
� WTen mendatgt is regdmd witM1in the limits Melean�. it andl & &rc m fd e,� frmn IM twlka of tmee m p,wlble. Tmmeling
Imtld a Inge Tree illdl de amwderM m an atemabv<w:um a is anttapatM thus tleasemy traxGag wia &.wy feaMr reds.
12, l
® 1'mtedlve(mang,hdl bathe last items remncMdunnp the linnldmnup.
13. lh,w Tren
53 Obi mmemo Ibet M;mmedtntely by pmmryt. fahhmCan motnx mdhtlseccmnmanAM byen«,paaahw.
Nell E: IT IS 1R I. UF. ELOPER•S RRSPONSIMI.ITV TO CONFER WITH THE CONTRACT OR ON T REF CONSERVATION
REQUIREMENTS.
7/27/2020
CONTRACT IrLIRCHASER SIGNATURE (DATE)
stim ph" 1 of 1
SCOTT R. COLLINS'Z
Lic. No. 035791 .1�
70NAL
o
1 c
Q
J
L9rn 0- v
u
00
CA �
C\I
�{ U
m
— o
l..-IH a
V � m
0
I
CV Q
CD
`°
L /
W
\ � u
LU iy-
ZJ L
U) F- i
LU Q o
� J
H C
J o
L9 jQ w
Q
zCL
Q
u
Wz
Q
LU O;j °
o
Ulr-I
ZLU U) Y J
LU ,f
I— U y
C/) O >
JH _J
co
L.l o
IY J
J�
___I
2
H '
CD
V,
CD u
o N J O
m
c
U
w �
J to
H
U m
u � aI
w .-
Ow 'u
Lr) o
JOB NO. I w
182150 0
N
SCALE
1 11=40
0
SHEET NO. I o
18 IW
m
v
MANAGER, OPERATIONS PROGRAM SUPPORT
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
POUNITEDSTATES
T POSTAL SERVICE
Date: November 23,2015
Subject: New Developments
In April 2012, the USPS revised regulation to clarify options for delivery and to provide the USPS
greater autonomy in determining how deliveries are added to the Postal Service network. While
curbline and sidewalk delivery remain viable and approved modes of delivery, the USPS will
determine how and when to approve these modes of delivery consistent with existing Postal
Operations Manual (POM) regulation regarding in -growth and both establishment and extension of
delivery.
Each year, new delivery addresses are added to our city, rual and contract routes which has a major
impact to our delivery cost. To control costs, we need to ensure new residential deliveries are being
made via centralized delivery. We must adhere to the guidelines that govern establishment of new
delivery. The City/County authorities (Planning and Zoning) can not give approval of delivery service.
The Postal Service cannot honor agreements that have been made between Planning and Zoning
and the developer.
At a minimum, the USPS will work with the builders and developers to determine what the best mode
of delivery is for the area prior to establishing or extending delivery service. However, as a national
agency, the USPS reserves the right to establish delivery in the most consistent and cost effective
means viable to meet our federal mandate of providing a free form of service that best meets the
need to establish and maintain a safe, reliable and efficient national Postal Service.
Please review the changes to the POM regarding Modes of Delivery and Delivery Equipment.
The changes are designed to enhance our ability to increase centralized and CBU delivery.
• Centralized and CBU delivery is now the default mode of delivery in business areas. Any
exceptions to centralized or CBU delivery mode in business areas must be approved by the District.
(631.2)
For new residential delivery, CBU is now the default. Exceptions to permit curbline delivery must
be approved by the District. (631.32)
• New deliveries within an existing block with an established mode of delivery no longer assume the
existing mode of delivery. We can require a more efficient mode of delivery (sidewalk delivery, for
example). (631.41)
• While we do not control addresses for buildings, we do control the sequential ordering of addresses
within any centralized delivery equipment. (631.442)
If more than one building in a complex has the same street address, the delivery equipment must
be grouped at a single location even if some of the units are in a different building. (631.452)
• Centralized delivery or CBU is the default option for delivery in mobile homes or trailer parks that
are permanent residences. Any exceptions to centralized or CBU delivery mode must be approved
by the District (631.462b)
• For dormitories and residence halls not directly affiliated with colleges, the Postal Service
determines the mode of delivery and can require the property owner to accept mail for all the
tenants. We will not distribute mail into centralized delivery equipment. (631.52)
• Delivery equipment must conform with the USPS standards for CBUs and high-rise delivery
equipment, USPS STD 4C wall mounted mail receptacles. Local offices do not have the authority to
approve any other centralized delivery equipment. (631.441)
-2-
• When obsolete delivery equipment is replaced in multi -unit buildings, it must be replaced with
equipment that meets current standards. (632.621)
The USPS standards include options for parcel lockers that we should ensure are provided.
There was also great consideration regarding safety of delivery, which also resulted in the
determination the the type of delivery warrented in your area.
Keith Smarte
Crozet Postmaster
1210 Crozet Virginia 22932
Work 434-823-9847
Cell434-529-0241
Keith.A. Sm a rteO usps.aov