The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSUB202000140 Review Comments Final Plat 2020-09-09�y OF ALg r � r� �=RGIN�' COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (434) 296-5832 Memorandum To: Brian Jamison, Roudabush Gale & Assoc., Inc (biamisongroudabush.com) From: Mariah Gleason Division: Community Development — Planning Date: September 9, 2020 Subject: SUB202000140 Glenbrook Phase IIA 115-161 — Final Plat The County of Albemarle Planning Division will recommend approval of the plat referenced above once the following comments, and those provided by other Site Review Committee, SRC, members, have been satisfactorily addressed. The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review. [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.] 1. [Comment] Subdivision title. Consider renaming the plat/project documents to "Glenbrook at Foothills Lots 155-161" to be consistent with previous Glenbrook plats and to get away from phasing language, which has not previously been associated with plats for this development. (Please note, if the subdivision title changes, the statement of consent would also need to be revised.) 2. [Comment] Tax map parcel numbers. Provide the unabbreviated tax map parcel numbers for the subject properties in at least one place on the plat. 3. [ 14-302(A)(9), 18-16.3] R-6 Residential. Specify as a note on the plat what kind of R6 development is intended. If standard, conventional the minimum lot size must be at least 7,260sf. If another development type is being pursued, provide relevant information to confirm that area and bulk regulations are being met. 4. [ZMA201600005] Setbacks. Include a note on the plat to mirror Note #12 of the Application Plan: "Garages shall be stepped back a minimum of 3 feet from the front of the primary residence for single family unites to meet relegated parking requirements." 5. [14-302(B)(5)] Overlay. Remove Note 13. These parcels are not subject to the Entrance Corridor overlay district. 6. [14-302(B)(3), 14-302(A)(4-5)] Landscape easement. The previously approved road plans for this development calls for a landscaping easement and plantings along the front property line of proposed Lots 157, 158, and perhaps 156. This easement has not yet been platted so it will need to be incorporated into this plat in order to comply with the approved road plans. (See attached plans.) 7. [Comment] Ownership of common or easement areas. If common areas or the above -mentioned landscape easement is included on this plat, please be sure to specific the ownership of each. Maintenance instruments for these improvements may also be needed prior to final plat approval. 8. [14-303(D)]Acreage. a. The Area Summary on Sheet 1 indicates proposed lots will be a combined total of 0.875ac in size, however proposed lot acreages on Sheet 2 indicate the lots will have a combined total of 0.891ac. Review and revise for alignment. b. Please note, if"SUB202000069 Eastern Avenue Rights -Of -Way and Easements" is recorded before this plat, area calculations and parcel deed book references will need to be updated to reflect revised parcel information. 9. [14-302(A)(7)] Lot lines a. It is currently difficult to distinguish between current and proposed parcel lines. Revise the plat to clarify different lot lines. (Note: Please use a different symbolization for the "vacated" lot line. It currently uses the same symbolization as easement areas.) b. Remove faded gray linework behind Lots 86, 87, etc. These illustrative lots have not been platted or approved, and their inclusion may lead to confusion. 10. [1 4-303(Q)] Water supply. Provide a note on the plat stating whether this subdivision will be served by a public water supply and a public sewer system. 11. [14-302(A)(3)] Existing street. Label and provide information for Chuboume Rd. 12. [14-302(A)(12)] Topography. In the supplemental materials, there appears to be a detached topographic label on the front boundary line of proposed Lot 157. Review and revise or clarify the nature of this outlying measurement. 13. [USPS] Group mailbox. New residential developments require centralized mail delivery. Will mail for these lots go to an existing centralized delivery location? Please see the attached letter from the USPS for more information. 14. [14-302(B)(1)] Resubmission. Reminder that revised plats must include the original date of drawing and the revision date(s) of each subsequent version of the plat. 15. [Comment] Future build -out. As this area continues to develop, please be aware of 14-401 and 14-407, which prohibit double -frontage lots and require a block width wide enough to allow two (2) tiers of lots, respectively. OTHER SRC REVIEWERS Albemarle County Engineering Services (Engineer) Matthew Wentland, mwentland(iWbemarle.org—No Objection Albemarle County Information Services (E911) Brian Becker, bbeckeraalbemarle.org —No Objection Albemarle County Building Inspections Michael Dellinger, mdellingerAalbemarle.org — See recommendation below • Due to required distances from lot lines and structures as required by the NFPA, underground propane tanks may be prohibited. Plan accordingly. Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue Shawn Maddox, smaddox"bemarle.org — No Objection Albemarle County Service Authority Richard Nelson, melson(i6erviceauthoritv.org — Requests Changes 1. RW SA sewer capacity certification will be required. 2. An exhibit showing proposed water meter and sewer lateral locations should be provided, prior to final plat approval. Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority Dyon Vega — Requests Changes 1. RW SA will require a sewer flow acceptance prior to final site plan approval. The request will need to be sent to us by ACSA and will include the following: • Estimated average daily dry weather sewage flow (ADDWF) • Point of connection into RWSA system (which manhole) • Number of units/square footage • Estimated in-service date Virginia Department of Transportation Adam Moore, adam.moore(c4vdot.virginia.gov — No Objection, see comment letter attached Albemarle County Zoning Division Rebecca Ragsdale, rragsdale"bemarle.org — Requested Changes 1. Proffer 6-Each plat and plan must provide 15% affordable units. Units in blocks that are not already approved on plats or site plans do not count towards the 15%. The plat is using "future blocks" to meet the 15% requirement. Two ADUs are required with this plat. In accordance with the provisions of Z.O. 14-229 of the County Code, if the applicant fails to submit a revised plat to address all of the requirements within six (6) months after the date of this letter, the application shall be deemed to have been voluntarily withdrawn by the applicant. Please contact Mariah Gleason in the Planning Division by using meleason e albemarle.org or 434-296-5832 ext. 3097 for further information. CC: Glenbrook LLC PO Box 1467 Charlottesville, VA 22902 (emailed to Simpson e riverbenddev.com) MANAGER, OPERATIONS PROGRAM SUPPORT UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE POUNITEDSTATES T POSTAL SERVICE Date: November 23,2015 Subject: New Developments In April 2012, the USPS revised regulation to clarify options for delivery and to provide the USPS greater autonomy in determining how deliveries are added to the Postal Service network. While curbline and sidewalk delivery remain viable and approved modes of delivery, the USPS will determine how and when to approve these modes of delivery consistent with existing Postal Operations Manual (POM) regulation regarding in -growth and both establishment and extension of delivery. Each year, new delivery addresses are added to our city, rual and contract routes which has a major impact to our delivery cost. To control costs, we need to ensure new residential deliveries are being made via centralized delivery. We must adhere to the guidelines that govern establishment of new delivery. The City/County authorities (Planning and Zoning) can not give approval of delivery service. The Postal Service cannot honor agreements that have been made between Planning and Zoning and the developer. At a minimum, the USPS will work with the builders and developers to determine what the best mode of delivery is for the area prior to establishing or extending delivery service. However, as a national agency, the USPS reserves the right to establish delivery in the most consistent and cost effective means viable to meet our federal mandate of providing a free form of service that best meets the need to establish and maintain a safe, reliable and efficient national Postal Service. Please review the changes to the POM regarding Modes of Delivery and Delivery Equipment. The changes are designed to enhance our ability to increase centralized and CBU delivery. • Centralized and CBU delivery is now the default mode of delivery in business areas. Any exceptions to centralized or CBU delivery mode in business areas must be approved by the District. (631.2) For new residential delivery, CBU is now the default. Exceptions to permit curbline delivery must be approved by the District. (631.32) • New deliveries within an existing block with an established mode of delivery no longer assume the existing mode of delivery. We can require a more efficient mode of delivery (sidewalk delivery, for example). (631.41) • While we do not control addresses for buildings, we do control the sequential ordering of addresses within any centralized delivery equipment. (631.442) If more than one building in a complex has the same street address, the delivery equipment must be grouped at a single location even if some of the units are in a different building. (631.452) • Centralized delivery or CBU is the default option for delivery in mobile homes or trailer parks that are permanent residences. Any exceptions to centralized or CBU delivery mode must be approved by the District (631.462b) • For dormitories and residence halls not directly affiliated with colleges, the Postal Service determines the mode of delivery and can require the property owner to accept mail for all the tenants. We will not distribute mail into centralized delivery equipment. (631.52) • Delivery equipment must conform with the USPS standards for CBUs and high-rise delivery equipment, USPS STD 4C wall mounted mail receptacles. Local offices do not have the authority to approve any other centralized delivery equipment. (631.441) -2- • When obsolete delivery equipment is replaced in multi -unit buildings, it must be replaced with equipment that meets current standards. (632.621) The USPS standards include options for parcel lockers that we should ensure are provided. There was also great consideration regarding safety of delivery, which also resulted in the determination the the type of delivery warrented in your area. Keith Smarte Crozet Postmaster 1210 Crozet Virginia 22932 Work 434-823-9847 Cell434-529-0241 Keith.A. Sm a rteO usps.aov (Z) COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Stephen C. Brich, P.E. 1401 East Broad Street Commissioner Richmond, Virginia 23219 August 25, 2020 County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 (804) 786-2701 Fax: (804) 786,2940 Attn: Mariah Gleason Re: SUB-2020-00140 - Glenbrook at Foothill - Phase IIA - Lots 155-161 - Final Plat Review #1 Dear Ms. Gleason: The Department of Transportation, Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use Section, has reviewed the above referenced plat as submitted by Roudabush Gale & Assoc., dated 07-27-2020, and find it to be generally acceptable. If further information is desired, please contact Max Greene at 434-422-9894. A VDOT Land Use Permit will be required prior to any work within the right-of-way. The owner/developer must contact the Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use Section at (434) 422-9399 for information pertaining to this process. Sincerely, Adam J. Moore, P.E. Area Land Use Engineer Charlottesville Residency VirginiaDOT.org WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING