HomeMy WebLinkAboutSE202000003 Correspondence 2020-09-10Revised August 17, 2020
RST Residences
Special Exception Application Narrative
On behalf of Seminole Trail, LLC (the "Owner") and RST Development, LLC (the "Developer',
and collectively, the "Applicant"), this Application for a Special Exception respectfully requests an
exception from the stepback requirements of Section 4.19 of the Albemarle County Zoning
Ordinance that would otherwise apply to the eight townhouse structures and the apartment
structure labeled "Building 1" on Sheet 6 of the conceptual plans submitted with this resubmittal
of this Application on August 17, 2020.
This Application is submitted in connection with a zoning map amendment application that
proposes to rezone tax map parcels 04600-00-00-10800 and 04600-00-00-10900 (the
"Property"), from R-1 Residential to Planned Residential Development ("PRD"), to allow for the
development of a multi -family townhouse and apartment community known as RST Residences
(the "Project"). The Project proposes a maximum of 370 residential units comprised of apartments
and townhouses. The Concept Plan shown on Sheet 4 of the application package shows a total
of 362 units, comprised of 254 apartments and 108 townhouse units. The townhomes are
proposed to be stacked and attached in a total of eight buildings (the "Townhome Buildings"). The
apartments are proposed in a total of four additional buildings. Figure 1 below shows the
arrangement of the buildings in the Project.
Building 1 and the eight townhome structures are proposed to exceed three stories. Accordingly,
each of these structures is subject to the County's front stepback requirement, which provides
that for each story beginning above 40 feet in height, or for each story above the third story,
whichever is less, the minimum stepback shall be 15 feet unless reduced by special exception.
Zoning Ordinance § 4.19.5. There is no minimum stepback for the side and rear of structures
under this rule.
Building 1 is designed with two rectangular wings (the "North Wing" and the "South Wing"),
which are joined together by common plaza and several pedestrian connections (a walkway and
several skyways). The South Wing fagade faces U.S. Route 29, while the fagade of the North
Wing faces the internal vehicle travelway between the North Wing and Building 2. Therefore,
the Applicant understands that the front stepback requirement applies to the side of the South
Wing that faces U.S. Route 29, and to the side of the North Wing that faces Building 2.
The requested special exemptions for both the North Wing and the South Wing, and for the
Townhome Buildings, should be granted because waiving the front stepback requirement would
not frustrate the purposes of Section 4.19, the Places29 Design Guidelines, or the
Neighborhood Model Principles.
The South Wino
The front of the South Wing will be located 449 feet from the U.S. Route 29 right-of-way. Given
the distance between Building 1 and the public road, the requested special exception will not
result in the undesired "canyon" effect along public roads that Section 4.19 is designed to
1
Revised August 17, 2020
prevent.' Moreover, Building 1 is the centerpiece of the Project. All residents will be served by
common amenities in and around Building 1, including a mail kiosk and recreation areas. In
addition, when prospective residents visit to tour available townhomes and apartments, they will
be received at the property management office in Building 1. Waiving the front stepback
requirement would increase Building 1's visual prominence, which would promote the Project's
sense of place by focusing attention toward the anchor building of this residential community.
The North Win
For the same reasons, the front stepback requirement should be waived for the front of the
North Wing. Waiving the stepback rules for the front of the North Wing will not lead to a
"canyon" effect, as the surrounding buildings are all proposed to be shorter than Building 1
Given the shorter height of the adjacent Buildings 2-4, the North Wing will be provided with
sufficient space and light to achieve the results that Section 4.19 seeks to achieve.
Taken as a whole, the Project's design implements the Neighborhood Model Principle that
recommends Buildings and Spaces of Human Scale. Figures 2 and 3 below provide a
representation of the pedestrian -oriented, tree -lined streetscape and the relation between the
proposed buildings. The proposed street trees are used, as mentioned in the Neighborhood
Model Principles, to enclose the street and sidewalks in a way that achieves a "comfortable
human scale." The proposed design is also meant to foster a walkable and interactive
residential environment to support a strong sense of community among residents.
The Townhome Buildings
The front stepback requirement should be waived for the Townhome Buildings because their
location and design also avoids the "canyon" effect. There very few places along "Private Road
C" as shown in the resubmitted plans where the Townhome Buildings are opposite other
buildings. In large part, the Townhome Buildings are situated opposite the central amenity area,
which allows for appropriate light to reach the roadway and avoids the appearance of a canyon.
With regard to the roads between each Townhome Building, the stepback requirement should
be waived because the proposed design of the facades will incorporate different materials,
textures, and features to prevent massing. These design features will help mitigate any
potential canyon effect. Figure 4 shows an illustrative example of the general character of the
proposed design. Please note this example is not particular to the Project, and therefore some
of the building measurements may not be reflected in the Project. Finally, waiving stepback
requirements allows for additional living space in the Project. Given the Project's focus of
providing affordable housing to Albemarle County citizens, waiving the stepback requirement
would help balance the County's design requirement with important housing priorities.
' The purpose of the stepback rules was discussed during the public hearing at which the Board of
Supervisors added Section 4.19 to the Zoning Ordinance. County Staff noted that Section 4.19 "avoids a
'canyon' effect." Statement of Ron Higgins, Deputy Zoning Administrator, Minutes of the Board of
Supervisors Hearing, June 3, 2015, at page 99.
2
Revised August 17, 2020
The Proposed Special Exceptions SUDDorts the Goals of the Comprehensive Plan
Waiving the front stepback requirement is consistent with the recommended future land use of
the Property under the Comprehensive Plan. The Project is located in the Development Area
and is designed for Urban Density Residential uses, with up to 34 dwelling units per acre. The
Applicant estimates that strict application of a 15-foot stepback to Building 1 would result in the
loss of ten residential units. As a reduction in the number of residential units is contrary to the
Comprehensive Plan's recommendation for the Property, a special exception from the stepback
is warranted. A reduction in the number of units also impacts the Project's ability to provide
affordable housing. With fewer units, the Project will be less effective in meeting the County's
affordable housing goals.
As noted above, Section 4.19 does not apply stepback requirements to the sides or rear of any
structures in a residential zoning district. Therefore, the remaining sides of Building 1 are not
subject to the stepback rules.
For these reasons, the Applicant requests a special exception from Section 4.19 as applied to
the fronts of the North Wing and the South Wing of Building 1. Granting the requested special
exceptions will further the goals of the Comprehensive Plan without creating significant
detriments to County residents.
Thank you for your consideration of this request.
3
RST Residences: Building 1
Figure 1. View of the Project including Building 1 at center (the South Wing is at right).
Figure 2. View of the North Wing (at right), opposite Building 2, and separated from Building 2 by a shaded, pedestrian friendly
vehicular travelway.
RST Residences: Building 1
Figure 3. Additional view of the North Wing, showing its front side facing Building 2.
RST Residences: Townhome Buildings (Illustrative Example)
Figure 4. Additional view of the North Wing, showing its front side facing Building 2.