Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP202000055 Review Comments Minor Amendment 2020-09-16�IRCI, �1\P County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Alan Franklin, Alan Franklin PE, LLC; (alan@alanfranklinpe.com) From: Andrew Reitelbach, Senior Planner Division: Planning Date: September 15, 2020 Subject: SDP2020-00055 Old Trail Block 2B Rutherford Hotel — Minor Amendment The Planner for the Planning Division of the Albemarle County Department of Community Development will recommend approval of the plan referred to above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.) [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.] 1. [32.5.2(a)] Provide the application number of this project (SDP2020-00055) in the title on the cover sheet of the site plan. 2. [32.5.2(a)] Include all applicable zoning overlay districts to the zoning note on the cover sheet. The zoning overlay districts for this property include the Entrance Corridor and Steep Slopes — Managed. 3. [32.5.2(a)] On sheet 3, under the survey notes, identify the correct zoning district and overlay districts for this property. The note indicates the master plan land use designation instead of the zoning district. 4. [32.5.2(a)] Depict and identify the location(s) of the Managed Steep Slopes on all sheets of the plan that include graphic representations of the site. 5. [32.5.2(a)] Identify the zoning district and the present use of the property in the labels for all the abutting parcels. 6. [32.5.2(i)] Is there a plan for what will be done with the unused entrance on the northeast side of the property, beside the entrance to the Lodge at Old Trail? 7. [4.12.13(a)] The loading space needs to be adjacent to the structure. Revise its location. Or submit a request pursuant to 4.12.13(f) for a modification of the location of the loading space, with justification for why it has been placed where it is depicted. 8. [4.12.19(b)] Identify the length of the concrete pad that will extend in front of the dumpster enclosure. It must be at least eight feet beyond the front of the dumpster. 9. [4.12.19(c)] Identify what is being used to screen the dumpster, including both landscaping and fencing/walls. Provide a section of the proposed enclosure wall or fence. 10. [4.12.16] Parking spaces must be at least 18 feet in length. Parking spaces can be 16 feet in length only if there is a 2-ft. overhang devoid of landscaping (other than grass) or other potential obstructions, such as light poles. For all spaces that are proposed to be 16 feet in length, depict this 2-ft. overhang adjacent to the spaces and remove all landscaping and other obstructions, including light poles. It appears that all spaces along the perimeter of the site are affected by this issue. 11. [4.12.16] Identify the width of the parking spaces along the western side of the property. 12. [4.17] On the photometric plan, sheet 8, the light loss factor (LLF) must be 1.0. Revise the luminaire schedule and all applicable calculations, such as footcandles, to reflect an LLF of 1.0. 13. [4.17] Clarify the symbolism of the proposed lights on the photometric plan and in the luminaire schedule. There are two symbols that appear to be exactly the same that identify two different lights —A3-1 and A5-1. It is unclear where all those lights are located. Only eight new lights are depicted on the plan; however, the luminaire schedule identifies there as being ten new lights overall. 14. [4.17] There are several areas where the footcandles are greater than the maximum allowed of 0.5fc at property lines and spilling onto adjacent parcels and public streets. Revise the locations of the lights or the lumens (or revise some other way) so that the amount of footcandles does not rise above 0.5 at the property lines. 15. [32.5.20); 32.5.2(k)] Depict and label all existing and proposed water, sewer, and drainage easements. 16. [32.5.2(1)] Depict and label all other existing and proposed utility easements. 17. [32.5.2(m)] Show the distance to the centerline of the nearest existing street intersection from the proposed ingress and egress. 18. [32.7.9.4(a)] Provide the plant list on the landscaping plan. The trees and shrubs on the plan are identified with abbreviations. However, there is no table providing their information, including name, height, canopy, caliper, etc. Staff is not able to review the landscaping plan without a plant list. 19. [32.7.9.7] Provide landscaping along the Claremont Lane side of the property to screen the parking lot and the dumpster pad. 20. [32.7.9.6] Identify where the 5% required parking lot landscaping is located on the landscape plan. Demonstrate that this requirement can be met. In addition, the calculated 792 sq.ft. is shown as being divided by 50 sq.ft. Where is this 50 sq.ft. coming from? 21. [32.7.9.8] Provide the required tree canopy, including calculations. As a commercial site, the tree canopy must be at least 10%. Please contact Andy Reitelbach at the Department of Community Development at areitelbach@albemarle.ors or 434-296-5832 ext. 3261 for further information. Comments from Other Reviewing Departments and Agencies Albemarle County Engineering Services —Emily Cox, ecox2@albemarle.org— Requested Changes; please see the comments below: -WPO plan must be submitted and approved before this plan can be approved. -Please ensure all trees are at least 5ft from storm pipes. Albemarle County Building Inspections— Michael Dellinger, mdellinger@albemarle.org— Requested Changes; please see the comments below: Add the following note to the general notes page: Retaining walls greater than 3 feet in height require a separate building permit. Walls exceeding 4 feet in height require a stamped engineered design also. Walls require inspections as outlined in the USBC. Add the following note to the general notes page: Accessible parking spaces, access isles, and accessible route shall be installed in accordance with ICC ANSI A117.1-09 and the 2015 Virginia Construction Code. Fire rated construction for the structure may be needed to due property line and construction type. Add the following note to the general notes page: ALL water lines, sewer lines, and fire lines from the main to the structure MUST have a visual inspection performed by the building department. Add the following note to the general notes page: Where the flood level rims of plumbing fixtures are below the elevation of the manhole cover of the next upstream manhole in the public sewer, the fixtures shall be protected by a backwater valve installed in the building drain, branch of the building drain or horizontal branch serving such fixtures. Plumbing fixtures having flood level rims above the elevation of the manhole cover of the next upstream manhole in the public sewer shall not discharge through a backwater valve. Add the following to the general notes page: All roof drains shall discharge in a manner not to cause a public nuisance and not over sidewalks. Albemarle County Architectural Review Board (ARB) — Margaret Maliszewski, mmaliszewski@albemarle.org — No objections at this time; please see the comment below: This one-story building is not expected to be visible from the Entrance Corridor. Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT)—Adam Moore, adam.moore@vdot.virginia.gov — No objections at this time; please see the attached memo. Albemarle County Fire -Rescue (ACFR) —Shawn Maddox, smaddox@albemarle.org —Requested Changes; please see the comments below: 1. Provide the ISO needed fire flow for the new occupancy type. 2. A knox box will be required. A note on the plan indicating the requirement and that the location can be coordinated with the fire marshal's office will suffice. 3. Provide a recent ACSA fire flow test showing the available fire flow. Albemarle County Service Authority (ACSA)— Richard Nelson, rnelson@serviceauthoritv.ore— Requested Changes; please see the comments below: Proposed water service and fire line are called out, but not shown. Provide fixture counts to confirm meter size. Stephen C. Brich, P.E. Commissioner (Z) COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1401 East Broad Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 August 19, 2020 Andy Reitelbach County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Re: SDP-2020-00055 — Old Trail Medical Offices — Minor Amendment Previously - Old Trail Block 2B - Rutherford Hotel - Minor Amendment Dear Mr. Reitelbach: (804) 786-2701 Fax: (804) 786,2940 The Department of Transportation, Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use Section, has reviewed the above referenced Old Trail Medical Offices — Minor Amendment, as submitted by Alan Franklin PE, LLC, dated June 11, 2020 and find it to be generally acceptable. A VDOT Land Use Permit will be required prior to any work within the right of way. The owner/developer must contact the Charlottesville Residency land Use Section at (434) 422-9399 for information pertaining to this process. If you have further questions please contact Max Greene at (434) 422-9894. Sincerely, Adam J. Moore, P.E. Area Land Use Engineer Charlottesville Residency VirginiaDOT.org WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING