Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP200500093 Review Comments 2005-10-05 (3)• ^�- 11�illr IlIIf1.�• COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 9724126 October 5, 2005 Ron Brownfield Keeney & Company Architects 1413 Sachem Place Suite 1 Charlottesville, VA 22901 RE: SDP- 2005 -0093 Crozet Mini Storage Major Site Plan Amendment Dear Sir: The Site Review Committee has reviewed the development proposal referenced above. Preliminary Comments for the following divisions of the Community Development Department and other agencies, as applicable, are attached: Albemarle County Division of Zoning & Current Development (Engineer) Albemarle County Division of Zoning & Current Development (Planner) Albemarle County Service Authority Virginia Department of Transportation Comments reflect information available at the time the development proposal was reviewed, and should not be considered final. However, the Site Review Committee has attempted to identify all issues that could affect approval of the proposed project. Please make the revisions that have been identified as necessary for final approval by the Site Review Committee. If you choose not to make the requested revisions, please submit in writing justification for not incorporating such revisions. Submit seven full size copies and one 11" x 17" copy to the Community Development Department including responses to each of the attached comments of the Site Review Committee by October 17, 2005. Include with the revisions a "REVISED APPLICATION SUBMITTAL" form. Failure to submit this information by this date will result in suspension of the review schedule. Review will resume when revisions are submitted along with a reinstatement fee of $65. Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional information. Sincerely, Francis H MacCall Senior Planner Zoning & Current Development COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development REVISED APPLICATION SUBMITTAL This form must be returned with your revisions to ensure proper tracking and distribution. County staff has indicated below what they think will be required as a resubmission of revisions. If you need to submit additional information please explain on this form for the benefit of the intake staff. All plans must be collated and folded to fit into legal size files, in order to be accepted for submittal. TO: Ron Brownfield DATE: 1015105 PROJECT NAME: Crozet Mini Storage Major Site Plan Amendment Submittal Type Requiring Revisions () indicates submittal Code County Project Number # Copies Erosion & Sediment Control Plan (E &S) WILL NEED WPO NUMBER ASSIGNED 2 Mitigation Plan (MP) 2 Mark Chambers Waiver Request (WR) Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP) WILL NEED WPO NUMBER ASSIGNED 2 Road Plan (RP) Private Road Request, with private /public comparison (PRR) 1 Mark Chambers Private Road Request — Development Area (PRR -DA) Preliminary Site Plan (PSP) 5 (1 regular size 1 reduced) Francis MacCall Final Site Plan (or amendment) (FSP) SDP- 2005 -093 7 Final Plat (FP) 1 Gary Whelan Preliminary Plat (PP) Easement Plat (EP) Boundary Adjustment Plat (BAP) Rezoning Plan (REZ) Special Use Permit Concept Plan (SP -CP) Reduced Concept Plan (R -CP) Proffers (P) Bond Estimate Request (BER) Draft Groundwater Management Plan (D -GWMP) Final Groundwater Management Plan (F -GWMP) Aquifer Testing Work Plan (ATWP) Groundwater Assessment Report (GWAR) Architectural Review Board (ARB) Other: Please explain (For staff use only) Submittal Code # Copies Distribute To: Submittal Code # Copies Distribute To: E &S 2 Mark Chambers SWMP 2 Mark Chambers FSP 1 Mark Chambers FSP 5 (1 regular size 1 reduced) Francis MacCall FSP 1 Gary Whelan µa -..v,.. l yRGINF� COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 October 5, 2005 Ron Brownfield Keeney & Company Architects 1413 Sachem Place Suite 1 Charlottesville, VA 22901 RE: SDP- 2005 -0093 Crozet Mini Storage Major Site Plan Amendment Dear Sir: Fax (434) 972 -4126 The Site Review Committee has reviewed the development proposal referenced above. Preliminary Comments for the following divisions of the Community Development Department and other agencies, as applicable, are attached: Albemarle County Division of Zoning & Current Development (Engineer) Albemarle County Division of Zoning & Current Development (Planner) Albemarle County Service Authority Virginia Department of Transportation Comments reflect information available at the time the development proposal was reviewed, and should not be considered final. However, the Site Review Committee has attempted to identify all issues that could affect approval of the proposed project. Please make the revisions that have been identified as necessary for final approval by the Site Review Committee. If you choose not to make the requested revisions, please submit in writing justification for not incorporating such revisions. Submit seven full size copies and one I V x 17" copy to the Community Development Department including responses to each of the attached comments of the Site Review Committee by October 17, 2005. Include with the revisions a "REVISED APPLICATION SUBMITTAL" form. Failure to submit this information by this date will result in suspension of the review schedule. Review will resume when revisions are submitted along with a reinstatement fee of $65. Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional information. Since Francis H MacCall Senior Planner Zoning & Current Development pF .aLy �P `Ji a [Y G1, X County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Francis MacCall, Senior Planner From: Mark Chambers, Engineering Technician Division: Current Development Date: 4 Oct. 2005 Subject: Crozet Mini Storage Major Amendment Francis: Engineering reviewed the subject major amendment submitted on September 13, 2005. We do not recommend approval, but request the following changes to bring the plan into compliance with County Code: 1. Please provide a signed and dated professional seal on the plan sheets. 2. Please make the following changes to the plan: a. Show all existing contours as dashed lines; b. Show all propose contours as solid lines; c. Show existing contours on adjacent parcels to a point 50' beyond the site boundaries. If off site grading is required temporary grading easements must be obtained from the effected property owners; d. Correct /clarify grading in areas where contour lines cross each other and tie all proposed contour lines into corresponding existing contour lines. For example see area north of existing stormwater detention basin and between building H and the existing property boundary; e. Please provide adequate spot elevations and proposed contours to ensure adequate drainage away from structures (See west side of building G and adjacent parking area). 3. The plan must accurately represent existing conditions on site and include all proposed and required improvements. Please make the following changes to the plan. a. Remove the 15" CMP culvert shown under the travel way and the culvert immediately up stream of it. b. Add the recently installed 15" RCP culvert and end sections. c. Please include the signs for the mini storage office and the sign to indicate "mini storage parking only no tractor trailer turn around" required by the approved site plan dated July 21, 2003. 4. Please delineate the center line and add stationing to the existing and proposed travelways. 5. Please dimension the radi of all the proposed horizontal curves. 6. Please show the existing travelway and proposed travelway to receive new asphalt paving so that the entire site has asphalt paving from the entrance at route 240 to existing asphalt paving installed with earlier improvements (existing paving ends near north west corner of building G). 7. Please provide traffic islands along on the east side of the 4 proposed parking spaces for building H. 8. Please provide a traffic island along the South side of the existing parking spaces for building G. 9. Please provide Albemarle County General Construction Notes on the plan. 10. A SWM plan application and fee are required. Please include pre- development and post development 2 and 10 year storm hydrology computations. Any increase in the peak flow rates of the 2 and 10 -year storm events must be attenuated or adequate channel analysis provided. In addition, a Lickinghole basin pro rata share contribution will be required, based on the increase in 10 -year peak flow rates. 11. An erosion and sediment control plan, narrative, application and fee are required. Please contact me if you have questions or require additional information. Copy: File #SUB200400284 �OF AL& 6 jRGI County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Ron Keeney or Ron Brownfield From: Francis H. MacCall, Senior Planner Division: Zoning & Current Development Date: 10/3/05 Subject: SDP 2005 -0093 Crozet Mini Storage Major Amendment The Planner for the Zoning & Current Development Division of the Albemarle County Department Community Development will approve the major amendment when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.) [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Code of Albemarle.] 1. The plan needs to be titled Crozet Mini Storage Major Amendment. The Name Crozet Mini Storage is the name that the original plan was approved under and should remain consistent throughout the life of the development for site plan purposes. 2. Show the previously approved Right -of -Way Dedication along Route 240. The current location of the front property line is not correct. 3. Also include this previously approved note "The Applicant agrees to build or bond vehicular and pedestrian connections to the adjoining properties, upon demand of the County. The pavement of the vehicular travel lanes shall not be less than twenty (20) feet in width, the pedestrian connection materials shall be subject to Agent approval" 4. The previous plan showed the existing trees near Route 240 adjacent to Tax Map 56 Parcel 86 to be removed from the water line. Was this done or are the trees still there? 5. Show the bumper blocks in the existing parking spaces. 6. [18- 4.12.19] For the dumpster that is onsite provide a dumpster pad that is compliant with Section 4.12.19. 7. [18- 32.5.6a 18- 32.6.6a] Provide specific written schedules or notes as necessary to demonstrate that the requirements of this chapter are being satisfied. Some of the required items are scattered throughout the plan and not all of them are listed, this includes but is not limited to a schedule of all abbreviations used, a summary table of each existing and proposed buildings and uses and the square footages, all existing and proposed lighting including wall pack lights, parking schedule (# required and # provided), and landscaping schedule (there appears to be some new and existing landscaping. Show a schedule that breaks down the new and existing. Also make it clear if you are moving existing trees to new locations) S. [18- 32.5.6a] Provide the source of the topography, and source of the survey. 9. [18- 32.5.6a] Describe and label the work/changes that were approved with the three letters of revision. l 0. [18- 32.5.6a] Provide a vicinity sketch showing the property and its relationship with adjoining streets, subdivisions and other landmarks. 11. [18- 32.5.6b] Note the maximum number of employees. 12. [18- 32.5.6b] Note the maximum floor area ratio and lot coverage. 13. [18- 32.5.6b] Note the maximum height of all structures. 14.118-32.6.66) & 18- 4.17.4.2] If there will be any new lighting, provide a description and photograph of each type of outdoor luminaire that emits 3,000 or more initial lumens. Please be aware that installation of such luminaires in the future that are not shown on this plan shall require an amendment to this plan. The photometric plan must show the values as maximum foot - candles with a Light Loss Factor of 1 (LLF at 1.0). 15. [18 -30.6] The final plan approval is subject to the issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness from the Architectural Review Board. Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional information. Copy: SUB - 2005 -0093 TO: FROM: DATE: Francis MacCall, Planner Gary Whelan, Civil Engineer September 20, 2005 RE: Site Plan Technical Review for: Crozet Self Storage -Major Amendment (TM 56, Parcel 87) The below checked items apply to this site. SDP - 2005 -00093 X 1. This site plan is within the Authority's jurisdictional area for: X A. Water and sewer B. Water only C. Water only to existing structure D. Limited service X 2. A 6 inch water line is located onsite. X 3. Fire flow from nearest public hydrant, located onsit distant from this site plan, is gpm + at 20 psi residual. X 4. An 8 inch sewer line is located onsite. 5. An Industrial Waste ordinance survey form must be completed. X 6. No improvements or obstructions shall be placed within existing or future easements. 7. and plans are currently under review. 8. and plans have been received and approved. 9. No plans are required. 10. Final and plans are required for our review and approval prior to granting tentative approval. 11. Final site plan may /may not be signed. 12. RWSA approval for water and /or sewer connections. Comments: Backflow prevention required. Show existing water meter and fire hydrant. Complete dedication of water and sewer lines serving property. Provide plumbing fixture count to size meter. The site plan does not show or incorrectly shows: meter locations waterline size waterline locations sewer line size sewer line locations expected wastewater flows easements expected water demands z0 z DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1601 Orange Road Culpeper, VA 22701 GREGORY A. WHIRLEY ACTING COMMISSIONER October 4, 2005 Glenn Brooks Department of Engineer and Development 401 McIntire Rd. Charlottesville, VA 22902 Subject: Site Review Meeting Comments Dear Mr. Brooks: Below are VDOT's cornments for the Site Plans reviewed at the September 20, 2005 Site Plan Review Meeting: SDP 2005 -00093 Crozet Self Storage, Route 240: (Francis MacCall ) • The existing entrance to the site was recently improved and is adequate for the on - site chanies. • No improvements are required. SUB 2005 -00274 Saudridfae, Route 1202: (Yadria Amarante) • This subdivision creates one new residential lot on Route 1202; • The lot has adequate frontage and meet the sight distance for a single residential dwelling. A permit will be required to construct the entrance to the site. • Entrance will need to be designed in accordance The Minimum Standards for Entrance to State Highways. SUB 2005 -00275 High View, Route 618: (David Pennock) • The subdivision creates 1 1 single family dwelling lots; • All accesses and roadways shall be designed in accordance with the current Subdivision Street Standards, The Minimum Standards for Entrances to State Highways and the Road Design Manual, • Entrance profiles, drainage computations, and intersectional sight distances will be required. 100 nr TRANSPORTATION EXCELLENCE 1 9 0 6 2 0 0 6 Glenn Brooks September 15, 2005 Page Two Please request the applicants submit a written description of the revisions when resubmitting for review. If you should have concerns with these comments, please discuss with this office prior to sharing with the applicants. Sincerely, C. C. Proctor III Assistant Residency Administrator cc Alan Schuck, Steve Snell, Bill Fritz, David Benish, Juan Wade, Elaine Echols, Joan McDowell, Yadria Amarante, David Pennock, Steve Tugwell, Stephen Waller, and John Glomettl Y OF Al, Y .7 C' � ffKrty� County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Ron Brownfield From: Francis H. MacCall, Senior Planner Division: Zoning & Current Development Date: 10/31/05 Subject: SDP 2005 -0093 Crozet Mini Storage Major Amendment The Planner for the Zoning & Current Development Division of the Albemarle County Department Community Development will approve the major amendment when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.) [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Code of Albemarle.] 1. The following note still needs to show up on this plan: "The Applicant agrees to build or bond vehicular and pedestrian connections to the adjoining properties, upon demand of the County. The pavement of the vehicular travel lanes shall not be less than twenty (20) feet in width, the pedestrian connection materials shall be subject to Agent approval' The letter is a good sign from the owner in his understanding that the connections could be made in the fixture. With that being said I do not think what is being proposed here is altering that any so that part of the previous plan should remain as was approved. 2. [18 -30.6] The final plan approval is subject to the issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness from the Architectural Review Board. Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional information. Copy: SUB -2005 -0093 NIL �IRGIN� COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 Project: SDP 2005- 00093, Crozet Mini Storage, Major Amendment Plan preparer: Mr. Ron Brownfield, Keeney & Co., Architects (fax 434.978.7438) Owner or rep.: Mr. Bill Masselli, Mass Enterprises of Virginia, Inc. (fax 434.823.185 1) Date received: 17 October 2005 (plan rev. date 17 October 2005) Date of Comment: 01 November 2005 Engineer: Allan Schuck, Engineer The major amendment for Crozet Mini Storage, received on 17 October 2005, has been reviewed. The engineering review for current development will recommend approval of the final site plan when the following items are adequately addressed: A. Final site plan comments: 1. Please provide a signed and dated professional seal on the plan sheets. [18- 32.6.1] Rev. 1: This comment has been not adequately addressed by the applicant. 2. Please make the following changes to the plan: a. Show all existing contours as dashed lines. (comment addressed) b. Show all proposed contour lines as solid lines. c. Show existing contours on adjacent parcels to a point 50' beyond the site boundaries. [18- 32.5.6d] d. Correct /clarify grading in areas where contour lines cross each other and tie all proposed co ur lines into corresponding existing contour lines. ( See N of Ex. SWM, bet Bldg H ex. Prop boundary) e' Please provide adequate spot elevations and proposed contours to ensure adequate drainage away from structures. (See west side of Bldg G and adjacent parking lot) [18- 32.5.6k] Rev. 1: This comment has not been adequately addressed by the applicant. The plan must accurately represent existing conditions on site and include all proposed and required improvements. Please make the following changes to the plan. a. Remove the 15" CMP culvert shown under the travel way and the culvert immediately upstream of it. (Renamed items from plan) b. Add the recently installed 15" RCP culvert and end sections. (not correct L east edge) c. Please include the signs for the mini storage office and the sign to indicate "mini storage parking only, no tractor trailer turn around" required by the approved site plan, dated 21 July 2003. (Note 2 on Sheet C 2) Rev. 1: Comment 3B has not been adequately addressed by the applicant. 4. Please delineateine centerline and add stationing to the existiftg and proposed travelways. [18- 32.5.61] Rev. 1: This comment has not been adequatcly addressed by the applicant. 5. Please dirlfsion the radii of all the proposed horizontal curves. [18- 32.5.61] R- }r. 1: This comment has not been adequately addressed by the applicant. V 6. Please show the existing travelway and proposed travelway to receive new asphalt paving so the entire site has asphalt paving from the entrance at SR 240 to existing asphalt paving installe rth earlier improvements (existing paving ends near NW corner of Bldg G.) A R V• 1: This comment has been adequately adds - essed by the applicant. 7. Please provide traffic islands along the east side of the four proposed parking spaces for Build' g 11. v. 1: This cornment has been adequately adth- cussed by the applicant. Paint striping has been shown. Also need to show it on the west side of the parking stalls as well. Please provide a traffic island along the south side of the existing parking spaces for Building G. :. _ Rev. I.: ,his comment has not been adequately adth•essed by the applicant. Please provide Albemarle County General Construction Notes on the plans. [DM, 902134] Rev. 1: This connnent has been adequately addressed by the applicant. 10. A SWM plan application and fee are required. Please include pre - development and post - development 2 and 10 year storm hydrology computations. Any increase in the peak flow rates of the 2 and 10 year storm events must be attenuated or adequate channel analysis provided. In addition, a Lickinghole Basin pro rata share contribution will be required, based on the increase in the 10- year peak flow rates. Rev. 1: This comment has not been adequately addressed by the applicant. Chart, on Sheet C 1, does not adequately address this comment. 11. An erosion and sediment control plan, narrative, application and fee are required. Rev. 1: This comment has been adequately adth -essed by the applicant. E &SC application, plan, and fee submitted on 24 October 2005. 12 °: Please provide a typical section of the proposed pavement for the travelway and parking. [ 18- 4.12.15a, 32.6.6e] 13. Please label the edge of pavement radii on the final site plans. [18- 32.6.6e] 14. Additional comments and /or conditions may be forthcoming due to the changes required. File: E2_fsp_ADS_05 -093 Crozet Mini Storage O COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 June 2, 2006 William Masselli, Sr. William Masselli, Jr. 5155 Three Notched Road Crozet, VA 22932 Re: Issues to be Resolved on Tax Map 56, parcel 87 Dear Messrs. Masselli: Fax (434) 972 -4126 I am writing this letter to focus and clarify issues that need to be resolved regarding your application for SP- 2005 -029 and your compliance with your Site Plan. We are hopeful that we can resolve many of them with the onsite meeting with Dave Wyant on Monday morning. We would like to resolve all issues well in advance of the Board of Supervisors' hearing for your Special Use Permit on July 5 th We can begin with the more basic use issue which is most relevant to the special use permit application. As you know, this property is zoned LI, Light Industry. With regards to the tire business, at any given time, the wholesale tire use must be the primary or main use (occupying greater than 50% of the total floor area). The retail tire use may only be a subordinate or lesser use (occupying less than 50% of the total floor area). We recognize that you are in the process of obtaining site plan approval for additional development which will include the demolition of some existing buildings on the property. We should discuss these issues for the site as it currently exists (consider the existing site as "phase I" for our discussion) and for the site as you propose it after the new development (consider that "phase II "). A. Wholesale Tire Business — 1. Please describe the wholesale tire use. (The definition of "wholesale business" from the Zoning Ordinance is: "An establishment for the sale and distribution of goods and merchandise to a retailer for resale as opposed to sale directly to the public.') 2. What is the total floor area devoted to the wholesale tire business as the site exists now? (Phase 1) 3. What is the total floor area devoted to the wholesale tire business as you propose on the pending Site Plan? (Phase II) William Masselli, Sr. William Masselli, Jr. June 2, 2006 Page 2 B. Retail Tire Business — (This must include all areas used for the retail business: e.g., counter area, waiting room, storage of used tires) 1. What is the total floor area devoted to the retail tire business? 2. What is the percentage of floor area for the retail tire use — is it less than 50%? The remaining issues relate to other uses of the site and the site plan. Other Uses of the Property (in addition to wholesale and retail tire sales) — a. What other uses exist on the property and which buildings do they occupy now (phase 1)? It appears these uses involve a trucking terminal, contractor's office ( Hartman's Home Improvements) and light warehousing (including Clear Communications). b. What other uses exist on the property and which buildings will they occupy later (phase 11)? 2. Site Plan Compliance — we recommend phasing the site plan to show phase I (existing tenants and any necessary modifications for them to be approved) and phase II (future demolition and development). Phase I will need to include parking calculations and provisions for all existing tenants, such as Hartman's Home Improvements. a. Parking b. Landscaping c. Curbing, pavement d. Entrance e. sidewalks 3. Front Buildina — addition of porch a. Will need to be added to site plan b. ARB review of both site plan and building permit c. Building permit To avoid any additional questions, we will want to confirm these items also: 1) Which buildings use public sewer and which use private septic? 2) No more than 3 different establishments (different business names) are served by the same private septic field. 3) The storage unit (identified as Building F) now used for tire sales — confirm that all necessary building permit approvals were obtained for the conversion of this unit from storage /warehouse to retail, offices and bathrooms. William Masselli, Sr. William Masselli, Jr. June 2, 2006 Page 3 a. Addition of porch needs to be shown on site plan b. New ARB review c. Building permit Sincerely, L IJV 3 Amelia G. McCulley, A.I.C.P. Zoning Administrator Cc: SP- 2005 -029 ALf��,� � IRGIN�� COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 June 14, 2006 Ron Keeney Keeney & Co Architects Via email keeneyarchitects (a�earthlink.net and regular mail 1413 Sachem Place Charlottesville, VA 22901 William Masselli, Jr. VIA FACSIMILE 823 -1851 and regular mail 5155 Three Notched Road Crozet, VA 22932 Fax (434) 972 -4126 Re: Pro Distribution — Special Use Permit and Site Plan Revisions Dear Messrs Masselli and Keeney: I'm sending this letter to both of you via two different routes just to make sure you receive it. It's so easy to miss a letter on an email address or a number on a fax and then it goes undeliverable. I'm writing to both of you and copying all the staff working on this, so everyone is "reading from the same sheet of music." I want to be sure we keep communication open and clear for everyone. I recognize that Mr. Keeney is not really directly involved in the special use permit and is involved in the site plan. 1) Special Use Permit for Subordinate Retail Sales With regards to the special use permit scheduled for the Board of Supervisors, the most important issue is to ascertain the area and percentages of the wholesale tire business and the retail tire business. Mr. Masselli faxed us something and left a later voicemail suggesting a change to 35 %. Mr. Masselli, can you please revise your worksheet and building plan to reflect your current proposal of 35 %? If at all possible, can you please fax it by the end of this week? 2) Site Plan Revisions Because this site is located on an entrance corridor, it is subject to a certificate of appropriateness. We can ask the Design Planner if the revisions to the front building are eligible for administrative approval. Ron Keeney William Masselli, Jr. June 14, 2006 Page 2 A. Phase 1 - Add a new sheet to the site plan to show the current situation - existing conditions, existing tenants + any necessary changes such as parking, for the first or current phase. This will essentially be an as -built listing all uses, parking, etc. with any necessary modifications to meet the ordinance. 1) For front building (trailer) on Rt. 240 — list the use (contractor's office). {Mr. Masselli, please be advised that the contractor will not be able to utilize outdoor storage of equipment or materials without a special use permit. They don't appear to have any outdoor storage at this time.) a) show the driveway entrance off the main road b) the porch addition c) sidewalk to connect to sidewalk on Rt. 240 turn lane d) required parking (3 -5 spaces) to serve the use 2) Show bollards or an acceptable alternative to create the parking island (shown on the site plan as a raised island and now striped as handicap parking in the new parking area). 3) Reflect existing landscaping onsite and note any additional plantings which are necessary to meet the landscape schedule. When we were onsite and looking at the existing tree canopy, we recognized that you may wish to modify or even to reduce some of the proposed landscaping. 4) List all uses, area devoted to them and required parking. If the trucking business remains now until the second phase, it should be listed. 5) Note which buildings are on private versus public water and sewer. B. Phase 2 - Make the proposed pending site plan (demo of trucking buildings and construction of new storage units in their place) as the second phase. List uses, area devoted to them, required and provided parking for phase 2. I'm sure most of this is done with the site plan submittal which is currently pending. 1 assume the main changes are to include the contractor in the front building and the wholesale and retail tire businesses. Ron Keeney William Masselli, Jr. June 14, 2006 Page 3 Mr. Masselli, can you please provide an estimated timeline for when you can be in compliance with the existing tenants? Basically, that will involve submittal of the revised plan described as phase 1 and construction or installation of any improvements shown on the site plan. For example, the parking for the contractor's office (Hartman's Home Improvements) will need to be installed as soon as is possible. The parking island, sidewalk extension and landscaping can be bonded for a later installation and /or installed now, depending on your schedule. If there are any questions about this, I'm happy to discuss it via phone or to set up a meeting to go over it. Sincerely, Amelia G. McCulley, AICP Zoning Administrator Cc: Lisa Green, Zoning Inspector Rebecca Ragsdale, Senior Planner Francis MacCall, Senior Planner 0, ALB " >RGIN�� COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 Project: SDP 2005- 00093, Crozet Mini Storage, Major Amendment Plan preparer: Mr. Ron Brownfield, Keeney & Co., Architects (fax 434.978.7438) Owner or rep.: Mr. Bill Masselli, Mass Enterprises of Virginia, Inc. (fax 434.823.185 1) Date received: 05 April 2006 (revision 2) 17 October 2005 (revision 1) 13 September 2005 (1" submittal) Date of Comment: 03 Ma 12006 (revision 2) 01 November 2005 (revision 1) 04 October 2005 (1" submittal) Reviewer: Mark Chambers There are two items remaining. Please see comments 8 and 10 in bold. A. Final site plan comments: 1. Please provide a signed and dated professional seal on the plan sheets. [18-32.6. 1 ] Rev. 1: This continent has been not adequately addressed by the applicant. Rev. 2 : This comment has not been addressed. 2. Please make the following changes to the plan: a. Show all existing contours as dashed lines. (comment addressed) b. Show all proposed contour lines as solid lines. c. Show existing contours on adjacent parcels to a point 50' beyond the site boundaries. [18- 32.5.6d] d. Correct /clarify grading in areas where contour lines cross each other and tie all proposed contour lines into corresponding existing contour lines. ( See N of Ex. SWM, bet Bldg H & ex. Prop boundary) e. Please provide adequate spot elevations and proposed contours to ensure adequate drainage away from structures. (See west side of Bldg G and adjacent parking lot) [18- 32.5.6k] Rev. 1: This comment has not been adequately addressed by the applicant. Rev. 2 : Thank you for addressing the above comments. 3. The plan must accurately represent existing conditions on site and include all proposed and required improvements. Please make the following changes to the plan. a. Remove the 15" CMP culvert shown under the travel way and the culvert immediately upstream of it. (Removed items fr plan) b. Add the recently installed 15" RCP culvert and end sections. (not correct C east edge) c. Please include the signs for the mini storage office and the sign to indicate "mini storage parking only, no tractor trailer turn around" required by the approved site plan, dated 21 July 2003. (Note 2 on Sheet C 2) Rev. 1: Continent 3B has not been adequately addressed by the applicant. Rev. 2: Thank you for addressing the above comments. 4. Please delineate the centerline and add stationing to the existing and proposed travelways. [18- 32.5.6i] Rev. 1: This connncent has not been adequately addressed b_v the applicant. Rev. 2: Thank you for addressing the above connnent. 5. Please dimension the radii of all the proposed horizontal curves. [I 8-32.5.6i] Rev. 1: This comment has not been adequately addressed by the applicant. Rev. 2: Thank yoti for addressing the above connnent. 6. Please show the existing travelway and proposed travelway to receive new asphalt paving so the entire site has asphalt paving from the entrance at SR 240 to existing asphalt paving installed with earlier improvements (existing paving ends near NW corner of Bldg G.) Rev. 1: This connnent has been adequately addressed by the applicant. Rev .2: Addressed with revision 1. 7. Please provide traffic islands along the east side of the four proposed parking spaces for Building H. Rev. 1: This comment has been adequately addressed by the applicant. Paint striping has been shown. Also need to show it on the west side of the parking stalls as well. Rev. 2: Addressed tivith revision 1. 8. Please provide a traffic island along the south side of the existing parking spaces for Building G. Rev. 1: This comment has not been adequately addressed by the applicant. Rev. 2: This connnent has not been addressed. 9. Please provide Albemarle County General Construction Notes on the plans. [DM, 902134] Rev. 1: This comment has been adequately addressed by the applicant. Rev. 2: Addressed with revision 1. 10. A SWM plan application and fee are required. Please include pre - development and post - development 2 and 10 year storm hydrology computations. Any increase in the peak flow rates of the 2 and 10 year storm events must be attenuated or adequate channel analysis provided. In addition, a Lickinghole Basin pro rata share contribution will be required, based on the increase in the 10- year peak flow rates. Rev. 1: This connnent has not been adequately addressed by the applicant. Chart, on Sheet C 1, does not adequately address this comment. Rev. 2: The, pro rata share contribution requirement for Lickinghole Basin will be provided with the water protection bond estimates at final approval. We have the following comment concerning the hydrology and routing computations: a. The pre - development map shows post development conditions and doesn't account for the existing detention pond. Please provide a pre - development map that shows the existing conditions. b. The pre - development hydrology computations do not consider the existing detention pond. You reference computations from May 16, 2003 in the narrative. Are these computations being used in the pre - development hydrology assumptions or in the routing geometry or both? Please provide more information in the narrative about your approach to meeting MS -19 for this site. Inn addition, if you're using computations from previous plans please provide copies of the computations along with drainage area maps and outlet structure details related to those computations. c. Please provide a detail of the basin's outlet structure on this plan. 11. An erosion and sediment control plan, narrative, application and fee are required. Rev. 1: This connnent has been adequately addressed by the applicant. E &SC application, plan, and fee submitted on 24 October 2005. Rev. 2: The erosion and sediment control plan is approved. The erosion and sediment control portion of the water protection bond will be provided when items 8 and 10 above are completed and all other approvals are obtained. 12. Please provide a typical section of the proposed pavement for the travelway and parking. [18- 4.12.15a, 32.6.6e] Rev. 2: Thank y on for addressing this comment. 13. Please label the edge of pavement radii on the final site plans. [ 18- 32.6.6e] Rev. 2: Thank yon for addressing this continent. 14. Additional comments and /or conditions may be forthcoming due to the changes required. Rev. 2: Thank your for addressing this corrnnent. File: E2_fsp_ADS_05 -093 Crozet Mini Storage 'J '' r I >F�cr1Ns� COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone(434)296 -5832 Fax(434)972 -4126 Project: SDP 2005- 00093, Crozet Mini Storage, Major Amendment Plan preparer: Mr. Ron Brownfield, Keeney & Co., Architects (fax 434.978.7438) Owner or rep.: Mr. Bill Masselli, Mass Enterprises of Virginia, Inc. (fax 434.823.1851 ) Date received: REV.3 September 22, 2006 0-5 April 2006 (revision 2) 17 October 2005 (revision 1) 13 September 2005 (1 submittal) Date of Comment: REV,3 Aukust 28, 2006 03 Ma x2006 (revision 2) 01 Novemher 200 5 (revision 1) 04 October 2005 (1" submittal) Reviewer: REV.3 Max Greene Mark Chambers The plan can be approved as submitted after the signed and dated professional seal has been added to the plan. Please submit 4 copies of the E &SC plan and narratives, two copies of the S WM plan, and two copies of the site plan. Bond amounts will be calculated once all plans and narratives have been received. A. Final site plan comments: 1. Please provide a signed and dated professional seal on the plan sheets. [ 18- 32.6.1 ] Rev. 1: This comment has been not adcquately addressed h}' the applicant. Rev. 2 : This Comment has not been addressed. REV.3 This comment remains unaddressed Please include a signed and dated professional seal on the nest submittal. 2. Pl ease m ake th f6lie.. in ,.{,.,.,.cos to the r,l.w 315.6d} c,X. r°P °6HR&f `4 N O • • 7. Please PrEwido tFaffie islands along the east side of the 4RIF PFE)POsed paFk spaeos fa Building W, • shE) , A'H. Also Reed to show 4 oti the west side ofthe paFkiHg stalls as well, 14fildifig =07.1 Rev. • Please 2- This eomment bas mos been oddpem-e& • s • • „ LME Ar i • r, . ! flow mtes. i =07.1 It - „ LME Ar i REV C — ,ment "c" appears to be addressed with t, _ _+ubmittal. Due to the redttced impervious areas shown on the proposal, no additional iu_forination is reyuied for approval. 11. plan, mid fee suhmAit4ed Em 24 Oeteher -2005. 12. 4.12.15a, 32.6.6ei Reb'- 2.. TL , i f' l l t i1Cl [IC .P �)[T�C7}'Z[GE CT) f f IEFf�61 ELT CL T /E)1 /CTTL 14. Additional comments and /or conditions may be forthcoming due to the changes required. File: F3_FS1 &SC SW119_NiRG_05 -093 Crozet Mini Storage jY OF A1,h� tr ► (q, COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone(434)296 -5832 Fax(434)972 -4126 Project: SDP 2005- 00093, Crozet Mini Storage, Major Amendment Plan preparer: Mr. Ron Brownfield, Keeney & Co., Architects (fax 434.978.7438) Owner or rep.: Mr. Bill Masselli, Mass Enterprises of Virginia, Inc. (fax 434.823. 851) Date received: REV.3 September 22, 2006 05 ,4pril 2006 (revision 2) 1 October 2005 (revision 1) 13 September 2005 ( I" submittal) Rev.4: 29 Sep 2006 Date of Comment: REV.3 August 28, 2006 03 Ala v2006 revision 2) < 17 01 November 2005 (revision 1) x �� 04 October 2005 ( I` submittal) Rev.4: 13 Oct 2006 Reviewer: REV.3 Max Greene Mark Chambers Rev.4: Glenn Brooks Rev. 4: These final site plan umendment and erosion control plan have received tenlalive final approvals. The erosion coittrol bend cimolnit is '$ 10.000. The plan can be approved as submitted after the signed and dated professional seal has been added to the plan. Please submit 4 copies of the E &SC plan and narratives, two copies of the SWM plan, and two copies of the site plan. Bond amounts will be calculated once all plans and narratives have been received. A. Final site plan, Erosion Control Plan, and stormwater comments: (SDP200600093, W P0200500085, and W P0200600025) I . Please provide a signed and dated professional seal on the plan sheets. [18- 32.6.1 ] Rev. 1: This comment has been not adequately addressed by the applicant. Rev. 2: This comment has not been addressed. REV.3: This comment remains unaddressed. Please include a signed and dated professional seal on the nest submittal. Rev. 4. This plan has finully been sealed. 2. Please make the following changes to the plan: a. Show all existing contours as dashed lines. (comment addressed) b. Show all proposed contour lines as solid lines. e. Show existing contours on adjacent parcels to a point 50' beyond the site boundaries. [18- 32.5.6d] d. Correct /clarify grading in areas where contour lines cross each other and tie all proposed contour lines into corresponding existing contour lines. ( See N of Ex. SWM, bet Bldg H & es. Prop boundary) Albemarle County Engineering Review Page 2 of 3 e. Please provide adequate spot elevations and proposed contours to ensure adequate drainage away from structures. (See west side of Bldg G and adjacent parking lot) [ 18- 32.5.6k] Rev. 1: This comment has not been adequately addressed by the applicant. Rev. 2: Thank you for addressing the above comments. 3. The plan must accurately represent existing conditions on site and include all proposed and required improvements. Please make the following changes to the plan. a. Remove the 15" CMP culvert shown under the travel way and the culvert immediately upstream of it. (Removed items from plan) b. Add the recently installed 15" RCP culvert and end sections. (not correct 1? east edge) c. Please include the signs for the mini storage office and the sign to indicate "mini storage parking only, no tractor trailer turn around" required by the approved site plan, dated 21 July 2003. (Note 2 on Sheet C 2) Rev. 1: Comment 313 has not been adequately addressed by the applicant. Rev. 2: Thank you for addressing the above comments. 4. Please delineate the centerline and add stationing to the existing and proposed travelways. [18- 32.5.6i] Rev. 1: This comment has not been adequately addressed by the applicant. Rev. 2: Thank you for addressing the above comment. 5. Please dimension the radii of all the proposed horizontal curves. [I 8- 32.5.6i] Rev. 1: This comment has not been adequately addressed by the applicant. Rev. 2: Thank you for addressing the above comment. 6. Please show the existing travelway and proposed travelway to receive new asphalt paving so the entire site has asphalt paving from the entrance at SR 240 to existing asphalt paving installed with earlier improvements (existing paving ends near NW corner of Bldg G.) Rev. 1: This comment has been adequately addressed by the applicant. Rev .2: Addressed with revision 1. 7. Please provide traffic islands along the east side of the four proposed parking spaces for Building H. Rev. 1: This comment has been adequately addressed by the applicant. Paint striping has been shown. Also need to show it on the west side of the parking stalls as well. Rev. 2: Addressed with revision 1. 8. Please provide a traffic island along the south side of the existing parking spaces for Building G. Rev. 1: This comment has not been adequately addressed by the applicant. Rev. 2: This comment has not been addressed. Rev. -l: This comment appears to have been aciclressecl. 9. Please provide Albemarle County General Construction Notes on the plans. [DM, 902134] Rev. 1: This comment has been adequately addressed by the applicant. Rev. 2: Addressed with revision 1. 10. A SWM plan application and fee are required. Please include pre - development and post - development 2 and 10 year storm hydrology computations. Any increase in the peak flow rates of the 2 and 10 year storm events must be attenuated or adequate channel analysis provided. In addition, a Lickinghole Basin pro rata share contribution will be required, based on the increase in the 10- year peak flow rates. Rev. 1: This comment has not been adequately addressed by the applicant. Chart, on Sheet C 1, does not adequately address this comment. Rev. 2: The, pro rata share contribution requirement for Lickinghole Basin will be provided with the water protection bond estimates at final approval. Albemarle County Engineering Review Page 3 of 3 We have the following comment concerning the hydrology and routing computations: a. The pre - development map shows post development conditions and doesn't account for the existing detention pond. Please provide a pre - development map that shows the existing conditions. b. The pre - development hydrology computations do not consider the existing detention pond. You reference computations from May 16, 2003 in the narrative. Are these computations being used in the pre - development hydrology assumptions or in the routing geometry or both? Please provide more information in the narrative about Your approach to meeting MS -19 for this site. In addition, if you're using computations from previous plans please provide copies of the computations along with drainage area maps and outlet structure details related to those computations. c. Please provide a detail of the basin's outlet structure on this plan. REV.3: Comment "c" appears to be addressed with this submittal. Due to the reduced impervious areas shown on the proposal, no additional information is required for approval. It. An erosion and sediment control plan, narrative, application and fee are required. Rev. 1: This comment has been adequately addressed by the applicant. E &SC application, plan, and fee submitted on 24 October 2005. Rev. 2: The erosion and sediment control plan is approved. The erosion and sediment control portion of the water protection bond will be provided when items 8 and 10 above are completed and all other approvals are obtained. 12. Please provide a typical section of the proposed pavement for the travelway and parking. [18- 4.12.15a, 32.6.6e] Rev. 2: Thank you for addressing this comment. 13. Please label the edge of pavement radii on the final site plans. [18- 32.6.6e] Rev. 2: Thank you for addressing this comment. 14. Additional comments and /or conditions may be forthcoming due to the changes required. Rev. 4: no additional comments.