HomeMy WebLinkAbout10012014actions 1
ACTIONS
Board of Supervisors Meeting of October 1, 2014
October 8, 2014
AGENDA ITEM/ACTION
ASSIGNMENT
PODCAST
1. Call to Order.
Meeting was called to order at 1:03 p.m., by
the Chair, Ms. Dittmar. All BOS members
were present. Also present were Tom Foley,
Larry Davis and Ella Jordan.
Listen
4. Adoption of Final Agenda.
ADOPTED, by a vote of 6:0, the final agenda.
5. Brief Announcements by Board Members.
Jane Dittmar:
Announced that the County Executive will be
providing an update on the disappearance of
Hannah Graham and the community’s
response.
The Chamber will hold its Legislative Fall
Festivus on October 9, 2014, at Old Trail.
The Scottsville Founders Day event was a
wonderful and well-attended event.
The Commonwealth Planning and Zoning
Conference will be held in Short Pump,
October 12-14, 2014, and will include a good
session on broadband.
The James River Boys & Girls Club will hold its
dedication on Saturday, October 4, 2014,
10:00 a.m.
Referenced the Virginia Freedom of
Information Act, Virginia Conflict of Interests
Act and the Virginia Public Records Act, and
asked the County Attorney to brief Board
members on the changes to insure
compliance.
Ann Mallek:
Thursday, October 9, 2014, 8:00 a.m.-2:00
p.m., is the CBIC Tech Tour for middle school
students interested in science.
A couple of weeks ago she participated in the
Boys & Girls Club Cycling Challenge.
Encouraged people to consider entering a
team next year.
The County will be accepting applications now
through October 31, 2014 for the current round
of the Acquisition of Conservation Easements
Program (ACE).
Congratulated the Local Energy Alliance
Program (LEAP) and the Solarize
Charlottesville project who has signed up 1,000
County and City residents to get solar hot
water on their houses and businesses.
Hope to discuss further with the Board the
following topics: possible ban on standing
water; reintroduction into legislative program
an effort to get Virginia to have deposit on
2
bottles and ban plastic bags; decibel levels and
sound for outside amplified music; and courts
report.
Announced that the last day to register to vote
in the upcoming election is Tuesday, October
14, 2014.
Diantha McKeel:
Thanked Police Chief Sellers, the Police
Department, and everyone who attended and
participated in the forum at Monticello High
School held on Monday, September 29, 2014,
which discussed the implications of what
happened in Ferguson.
6. Recognitions:
a. Proclamation recognizing October 6, 2014 as
World Habitat Day.
Chair read and presented to Peter
McFaren. ADOPTED, by a vote of 6:0.
b. Proclamation recognizing October 2014 as
Domestic Violence Awareness Month.
Ms. Palmer read. ADOPTED, by a vote of
6:0.
c. Proclamation recognizing October 3-12, 2014
as American Craft’s Week’s Fifth Anniversary.
Ms. Mallek read. ADOPTED, by a vote of
6:0.
d. Proclamation recognizing October 2014 as
Virginia Wine Month.
Ms. Mallek read. ADOPTED, by a vote of
6:0
Nonagenda. Recognized Tom Foley, County
Executive, for 15 years of service to the
County.
Attachment 1
Attachment 2
Attachment 3
Attachment 4
Listen
7. From the Public: Matters Not Listed for Public
Hearing on the Agenda.
Jake Washburne, Samuel Miller District,
County Voter Registrar, spoke about the new
photo ID law and the role of the Registrar’s
office.
ClaraBelle Wheeler, Chairperson of the
Electoral Board, spoke about the Registrar’s
office and photo id.
The following individuals spoke about the
proposed wireless ordinance, and siting of cell
towers and facilities:
Bob Toplin, Rivanna District
Ellen Dudley, Rivanna District
Diane Ritter, Rivanna District
John Clem, Rivanna District
Carolyn Dawson, Rivanna District
Tim Lerous, Rivanna District
Dade VanDerWorf, Samuiel Miller District
Jennifer Greeson, Samuel Miller District
Jeff Werner, Piedmont Environmental
Council
Neil Williamson, Free Enterprise Forum
Listen
3
8.2 FY 2014 Budget Amendment and Appropriations.
APPROVED, by a vote of 5:1(Boyd),
appropriations #2014118, #2014119, and
#2014120 for general government and school
division programs and projects.
Clerk: Forward copy of signed
appropriations to OMB, Finance
and appropriate individuals.
Listen
8.3 FY 2015 Budget Amendment and Appropriation.
APPROVED, by a vote of 5:1(Boyd),
appropriations #2015035, #2015036,
#2015037, #2015038, #2015039, #2015040,
#2015041, #2015042, #2015043, #2015044,
#2015045, and #2015046 for general
government and school division programs.
Clerk: Forward copy of signed
appropriations to OMB, Finance
and appropriate individuals.
8.4 OneVirginia2021 Redistricting Resolution.
ADOPTED, by a vote of 5:1(Boyd),
Resolution.
Clerk: Forward copy of adopted
resolution to OneVirginia2021
and copy County Attorney’s
office.
(Attachment 5)
8.5 Lewis & Clark Exploratory Center Loan Extension.
APPROVED, by a vote of 5:1(Boyd), the
LCEC’s requested deadline for repayment of
the loan to April 17, 2015, subject to the
condition that the LCEC make a payment in
lieu of interest to the EDA of $1,250 due on
January 17, 2015 unless the EDA determines
that such a payment would pose an obstacle
to the LCEC fully completing the project; and
REQUESTED that the EDA extend the date
by which the loan is due and payable and
amend the promissory note as necessary to
allow the extension to April 17, 2015 and to
require the payment in lieu of interest as
recommended.
Mr. Boyd requested that staff research the
implications of forgiving the loan.
Clerk: Forward approval request
to EDA.
County Executive staff: Proceed
as directed by Board and
schedule on agenda when ready
for discussion.
8.6 ZMA-2013-00004. Hollymead Town Center (Block
VI).
APPROVED, by a vote of 5:1(Boyd), ZMA-
2013-00004, Hollymead Town Center – Area
C, Blocks IV and VI, and ADOPTED
Ordinance.
Clerk: Forward copy of signed
ordinance to Community
Development and County
Attorney’s office. (Attachment 6)
9. Regional Legislative Program.
By a vote of 6:0, ADOPTED the draft TJPDC
legislative program.
Announced that the TJPDC legislative forum is
scheduled for October 29, 2014, 6:00 p.m.,
COB-5th Street.
Ms. Palmer asked for background information
on “opposing legislation mandating expansion
of the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act’s
coverage area”.
Ms. McKeel asked for information on how the
Comprehensive Services Act is funded, i.e.,
whether it is totally funded by local government
or the cost is split with the school system.
Clerk: Notify approval of program
and request additional
information from David Blount.
(Attachment 7)
Listen
10. FY 15 – FY 17 Strategic Plan.
APPROVED, by vote of 6:0, the Year One
County Executive: Proceed as
approved (Attachment 8)
4
strategic objectives.
11. FY 14 Unaudited Annual Financial Report (UAFR)
and FY 14 Annual Economic Indicators Report
(AEIR).
HELD discussion.
Listen
12. Total Compensation: Medical Insurance and Leave
Program.
HELD discussion.
Listen
13. FY 16 Agency Review Processes.
HELD discussion.
Listen
14. Board-to-Board, Ned Gallaway, School Board
Chairman.
RECEIVED.
Listen
15. JAUNT, Donna Shaunesey, Executive Director.
RECEIVED.
a. Recognition: Clifford Buys for 17 years of
service on JAUNT Board.
HELD.
NonAgenda. Recognized Donna Shaunesey
for her service.
(Attachment 9)
16. Route 29 Project Delivery Advisory Panel Update.
HELD discussion.
Mark Graham announced that the business
engagement discussion scheduled for
October 23, 2014, 4:00 p.m., at Jack Jouett
Middle School.
Requested staff to clarify action needed to
direct the MPO to include the extension of
Ashwood Boulevard to Berkmar Drive
Extended in the Long Range Transportation
Plan and the MPO TIP.
Mr. Boyd mentioned request by residents
along Polo Grounds Road about installing
light during Route 29 construction.
Community Development:
Provide information needed to
forward request.
Clerk: Schedule on October 8th
agenda.
Listen
17. Letter to Governor McAuliffe, re: FY16 Funding for
Stormwater Local Assistance Fund (SLAF).
APPROVED letter.
Clerk: Forward letter to
appropriate individuals.
(Attachment 11)
Listen
18. Closed Meeting.
At 4:25 p.m., the Board went into Closed
Meeting pursuant to Section 2.2-3711(A) of the
Code of Virginia under subsection (1) to
consider appointments to boards, committees,
and commissions in which there are pending
vacancies or requests for reappointments;
under subsection (7) to consult with and be
briefed by legal counsel and staff regarding a
specific legal matter requiring legal advice
relating to a stormwater utility fee.
Listen
19. Certify Closed Meeting.
At 5:13 p.m., the Board reconvened into open
meeting and certified the closed meeting.
20. Boards and Commissions: Appointments.
APPOINTED Mr. Jon McKeon, Alice (Lisa)
Marshall and Susan Munson to the Crozet
Community Advisory Council, with said terms
to expire March 31, 2016.
Clerk: Prepare appointment/
reappointment letters, update
Boards and Commissions book,
webpage, and notify appropriate
persons.
5
APPOINTED Mr. Jesse Warren to the Long
Range Solid Waste Solutions Advisory Panel,
with said term to expire November 30, 2015.
21. Work Session: Wireless, ZTA-2014-4.
HELD discussion.
(Attachment 10) Listen
22. Brief Update on Broadband.
HELD discussion.
Chip Boyles announced that the TJPDC will be
hosting a regional broadband discussion on
November 14, 2014, time TBD.
Listen
23. Discussion: W orkforce Training/Mid-Skills
a. Charlottesville-Albemarle Technical Education
Center (CATEC), Bruce Bosselman, Interim
Director.
b. Piedmont Virginia Community College
(PVCC), Dr. Frank Friedman, President.
c. Aging workforce, Peter Thompson, Executive
Director, The Senior Center.
HELD discussion.
Listen
24. From the Board: Committee Reports and Matters
Not Listed on the Agenda.
Brad Sheffield:
Announced that he and Ms. McKeel will speak
to the Free Enterprise Forum on October 14,
2014, 11:30 a.m.-1:30 p.m., and asked Mr.
Foley if he could join them.
Mentioned issue with fence in Branchlands
located on ACSA easement and asked if an
exception that would allow an alternative to
completely moving fence further into the
property.
Liz Palmer:
Announced that Mr. Wood Hudson, from the
TJPDC, will serve as the liaison to the Long
Range Solid Waste Solutions Advisory Panel.
Provided update on CIP process work group.
Announced that she and Mr. Boyd attended
the first meeting with the City on the river
planning. Mr. Boyd provided an update.
Ann Mallek:
Provided update on the courts meeting held
on September 29th.
Asked County Attorney’s office to explore
options for enabling authority to regulate
stagnant water.
Requested information on Bottle Bill legislation.
Discussed lowering the noise decibel level in
the rural areas.
Jane Dittmar:
Recently participated in an information sharing
lunch with representatives from the Counties of
Nelson, Buckingham, Fluvanna and Louisa.
She and Ms. McKeel met with representatives
of Planning Commission and staff to discuss
the Board’s and Commission’s process. She
will provide additional information to the Board
on October 8, 2014.
County Executive: Follow-up with
ACSA.
County Attorney/County
Executive: Proceed as directed.
Listen
6
UVA has provided the County Executive with a
chart on content areas to provide a pathway for
contacts.
Suggested that when a Board member comes
into contact with a state legislator, that it take
the time mention challenges the County is
facing locally.
Provided additional update on the town hall
meeting put together by Chief Sellers and the
Crime Prevention Council.
25. From the County Executive: Report on Matters
Not Listed on the Agenda.
Tom Foley:
Provided brief update on the County’s
involvement with the Hannah Graham
situation.
Highlighted issues from the County Executive’s
monthly report.
Commented that Board members have
requested approximately 20 town hall
meetings. Staff will discuss with Board
members how to manage the number of
meetings effectively.
26. Adjourn.
The meeting was adjourned at 8:53 p.m.
ewj/tom
Attachment 1 – Proclamation recognizing October 6, 2014 as World Habitat Day
Attachment 2 – Proclamation recognizing October 2014 as Domestic Violence Awareness Month
Attachment 3 – Proclamation recognizing October 3-12, 2014 as American Craft’s Week’s Fifth Anniversary
Attachment 4 – Proclamation recognizing October 2014 as Virginia Wine Month
Attachment 5 – OneVirginia2021 Redistricting Resolution
Attachment 6 – ZMA-2013-00004. Hollymead Town Center (Block VI) Ordinance and Proffers
Attachment 7 – Regional Legislative Program
Attachment 8 – FY 15 – FY 17 Strategic Plan
Attachment 9 – Recognition of Donna Shaunesey for service with JAUNT
Attachment 10 – ZTA-2014-04 Wireless Comments/Direction
Attachment 11 – Letter to Governor McAuliffe, re: FY16 Funding for Stormwater Local Assistance Fund (SLAF)
7
ATTACHMENT 1
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, the world’s housing situation is a crisis in need of attention and action, with 1.6 billion people living
in inadequate shelter; and
WHEREAS, on World Habitat Day, October 6, around the world, individuals, organizations and government
officials are raising awareness, educating and mobilizing to take action on the current global
housing crisis while working together to ensure adequate housing for all; and
WHEREAS, as the international community seeks to meet critical shelter needs, affordable housing and
neighborhood revitalization initiatives best occur within the framework of a comprehensive local
strategy and a development plan supported by the local government and its citizenry; and
WHEREAS, Habitat for Humanity of Greater Charlottesville addresses the causes and systemic issues tha t
perpetuate poverty housing;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that on this 6th day of October, 2014, the County of Albemarle
officially joins Habitat volunteers, homeowners, partners and supporters around the region in
recognizing World Habitat Day and is committed to increasing opportunities for affordable
housing for all.
Signed and Sealed this 1st day of October, 2014.
8
ATTACHMENT 2
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, the problems of domestic violence are not confined to any group or groups of peopl e but
cross all economic, racial and societal barriers, and are supported by societal indifference; and
WHEREAS, the crime of domestic violence violates an individual’s privacy, dignity, security, and
humanity, due to systematic use of physical, emotional, sexual, psychological and economic control and/or
abuse, with the impact of this crime being wide-ranging; and
WHEREAS, no one person, organization, agency or community can eliminate domestic violence on their
own—we must work together to educate our entire population about what can be done to prevent such violence,
support victims/survivors and their families, and increase support for agencies providing services to those
community members; and
WHEREAS, the Shelter for Help in Emergency has led the way in the Albemarle County in addressing
domestic violence by providing 24-hour hotline services to victims/survivors and their families, offering support
and information, and empowering survivors to chart their own course for healing; and
WHEREAS, the Shelter for Help in Emergency commemorates its 35th year of providing unparalleled
services to women, children and men who have been victimized by domestic violence;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, in recognition of the important work being done by the Shelter
for Help in Emergency, that I, Jane D. Dittmar, Chair of the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, do hereby
proclaim the month of
October 2014
as
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AWARENESS MONTH
and urge all citizens to actively participate in the scheduled act ivities and programs sponsored by the Shelter for
Help in Emergency, and to work toward the elimination of personal and institutional violence against women,
children and men.
Signed and sealed this 1st day of October, 2014.
9
ATTACHMENT 3
RECOGNITION
WHEREAS, the culture of the Virginia artisan inspires appreciative audiences for its unique work and
distinctive way of life; and
WHEREAS, the production and use of handmade arts and artisan agricultural products invoke an intimate
lifelong relationship of value and appreciation for the work of highly skilled individuals; and
WHEREAS, the state of Virginia currently hosts 27 community -connected and developing artisan trails
representing 40 counties and 11 cities across the Commonwealth that are strengthening our
economy through a connective community Artisan Trail Network; and,
WHEREAS, artisans and agricultural artisans contribute significantly to strong local and creative economies
and is an effective avenue toward entrepreneurial oppor tunities and the diversification of local
economies undergoing transition; and
WHEREAS, artisans and agricultural artisans are integrated into every aspect of life in Virginia –
strengthening the economy, enriching civic life, driving tourism, and exerting a profound positive
influence on the education of our children;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that, we, the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, do recognize the
week of October 3-12, 2014 as Virginia Artisan Week and encourage all citizens to join in this
event.
Signed and sealed this 1st day of October, 2014.
10
ATTACHMENT 4
Proclamation
Virginia Wine Month
WHEREAS, from modest beginnings in colonial times, Virginia has become a nationwide leader in the wine
industry, now fifth in the nation in wine production and number of wineries with wine sales
growing 26 percent since 2010, to 6.25 million bottles of Virginia wine sold worldwide in fiscal
year 2014; and
WHEREAS, wines from the Commonwealth, including those from Albemarle Coun ty, are winning national
and international awards and recognition for their elegant qualities, imparted by skilled vintners
and Virginia’s terroir; and
WHEREAS, many of Albemarle’s 35 vineyards, most with wineries on site, are run by families as strong
agricultural enterprises that can be passed on to future generations, providing economic benefit
for winery owners and employees and for other Albemarle ventures supported by the patronage
and purchasing power of winery visitors, including farming of heritage and heirloom crops,
restaurant cuisine committed to selling local where possible, and tourism focused on sustaining
the land and the local culture; and
WHEREAS, in 2013 Albemarle County had the most bearing acres of grapes of any area in the state –568
acres, or 18.4% of the state’s total bearing acres which is an increase of 26% from 2010 – and is
part of the central region of Virginia which produced the most tons of grapes – 2849 tons, or
41.5% of the total in the state in 2013; and
WHEREAS, Albemarle County values our wineries’ stewardship, keeping their land producing and protected
in agricultural uses, preserving scenic vistas, historic sites and other amenities which make
Albemarle wineries ideal places of entertainment, culture, enjoyment and soc ial engagement
that enrich Albemarle County’s quality of life and culture of hospitality;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, does hereby
recognize Albemarle County wineries and their contribution to the Virgin ia wine industry’s
success and encourage County residents and visitors to visit a winery or purchase local wines
through local restaurants and shops during October 2014, Virginia Wine Month.
Signed and sealed this 1st day of October, 2014.
11
ATTACHMENT 5
A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE EFFORTS OF THE ORGANIZATION
ONEVIRGINIA2021: VIRGINIANS FOR FAIR REDISTRICTING, TO DEPOLITICIZE
THE LEGISLATIVE REDISTRICTING PROCESS
WHEREAS, the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors strives to promote and support id eas that
improve the democratic process and citizens’ representation and engagement in civic life; and
WHEREAS, the organization OneVirginia2021 supports the belief that Virginia’s historical practice of
redistricting by the majority party in each legislative chamber is an outdated practice that stifles political
competition, discourages compromise and ensures continued control by the party in power; and
WHEREAS, the current redistricting process has rendered up to 90 percent of Virginia General
Assembly and Congressional districts uncompetitive, including those held by both parties representing parts of
Albemarle County, and
WHEREAS, OneVirginia2021 believes that Virginia’s state and congressional districts belong to its
citizens and not to any legislator, interest group or political party; and
WHEREAS, OneVirginia2021 believes that the redistricting process should not be a tool used by those
in power to protect and bolster their power, but should be designed for the best interests of Virginia’s democrac y
and its citizens; and
WHEREAS, the need is critical to restore trust, compromise and fair competition to Virginia politics;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors fully supports
the goals of OneVirginia2021: Virginians for Fair Redistricting, to depoliticize the redrawing of legislative district
lines with an approach that advocates for fairness, transparency and accountability, and which keeps the
citizens’ interests in mind, encourages healthy debate and partic ipation by the public in the process.
12
ATTACHMENT 6
ORDINANCE NO. 14-A(2)
ZMA 2013-00004
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE ZONING MAP
FOR TAX MAP AND PARCEL NUMBER 03200-00-00-041L0
WHEREAS, the application to amend the zoning map for Tax Map and Parcel Nu mber 03200-00-00-
041L0 (the “Property”) is identified as ZMA 2013-00004, Hollymead Town Center – Block VI (“ZMA 2013-
00004”); and
WHEREAS, the Property is zoned Planned Development – Mixed Commercial (“PD-MC”), subject to the
proffers, an application plan, and a code of development, all of which were adopted on August 6, 2003 in
conjunction with ZMA 2001-00020; and
WHEREAS, ZMA 2013-00004 proposes to amend the proffers, the application plan, and the code of
development applicable to the Property in order to allow townhouse units to be established where a parking area
is authorized in Block VI shown on the existing application plan, and to eliminate the required minimum square
footage of non-residential uses in Block IV shown on the existing application p lan; and
WHEREAS, on July 29, 2014, after a duly noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission
recommended approval of ZMA 2013-00004, provided that technical revisions were made to the proffers and
changes were made to the pending application plan in order to accomplish a more effective open space system
and to reduce crowding and congestion unless alternate circulation was provided on the pending application
plan; and
WHEREAS, on September 10, 2014, the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors held a dul y noticed
public hearing, after which the Board deferred acting on the application and directed the Planning Commission to
determine whether the revised application plan achieved the effective open space and reduced crowding and
congestion that it recommended on July 29, 2014; and
WHEREAS, on September 16, 2014, the Planning Commission considered the revised application plan
and concluded that the revised application plan provided effective open space and satisfactorily reduced
crowding and congestion.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia, that upon
consideration of the executive summaries and staff report prepared for ZMA 2013 -00004 and their attachments,
including the proffers and application plan revised after the Planning Commission public hearing, the information
presented at the public hearing, the material and relevant factors in Virginia Code § 15.2 -2284, and for the
purposes of public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good zoning practices, the Board hereby
approves ZMA 2013-00004 with the proffers dated September 18, 2014, the application plan entitled in relevant
part “Zoning Map Amendment for Hollymead Town Center Block C-6 General Development Plan,” last revised
September 9, 2014, and the amended code of development entitled in relevant part “Revised Application Booklet
for Code of Development Revised ZMA 201300004,” revised September 18, 2014, and the zoning map for Tax
Map and Parcel Number 03200-00-00-041L0 is amended accordingly.
.*****
13
14
15
16
ATTACHMENT 7
2015
Thomas Jefferson Planning District Legislative Program
Representing the Local Governments of:
Albemarle County
City of Charlottesville
Fluvanna County
Greene County
Louisa County
Nelson County
October 2014
Allen Hale, Chairman
Chip Boyles, Executive Director
David Blount, Legislative Liaison
EQUALIZED REVENUE AUTHORITY
The Planning District localities urge the governor and legislature to equalize the revenue-raising
authority of counties with that of cities.
Background:
Over the years, national economic conditions, increased federal and state requirements, declining aid to
localities and increased taxpayer resistance to local levies have challenged local government ability to generate
revenues, appropriate funds and set priorities in an attempt to meet the service needs of local citizens. Despite
political hurdles, many localities have increased existing taxes and fees, or adopted new ones. Local
governments also have taken significant actions to control spending, to include deferring maintenance and
capital outlays and reducing their workforces.
Rationale:
A number of State-level studies, dating back as far as the early 1980’s, have noted that the differences between
city and county taxing authority exist due to historical distinctions in the levels of services provided, and that they
should be eliminated. This distinction has become less prevalent with increased urbanization and
suburbanization, as a growing number of counties now provide levels of services s imilar to cities. In fact, the
State requires cities and counties to deliver, to participate in the delivery of or to fund many services in the areas
of education, the environment, human services, public safety, courts and judicial administration, and elec tion
administration, among others. Levels of funding, the degree of service responsibility and standards related to
delivery of such services often are topics of debate between the State and localities.
Virginia’s localities utilize a revenue base that re lies largely on the real property tax, which of late, is providing a
smaller percentage of local resources (due to slow growth or decline in assessments) and which in the future,
TOP PRIORITY and LEGISLATIVE REQUEST
17
likely will not grow commensurate with the needs of the locality. Also affecting the real property base is the
extent of tax-exempt property (both government and non-government) within local boundaries.
This proposal essentially removes the caps that currently apply to county authority to levy the meals, lodging and
amusement taxes, as well as the requirement that meals taxes in counties be subject to approval by referendum.
It stands to help diversify and broaden the revenue base of counties by further reducing dependency on the real
property taxes. We further believe that, at a minimum, equalizing revenue authority for counties should be on the
table as Virginia examines modernizing its tax system to comport with the realities of a global, information -driven
economy, which will rely less on federal and other government spending a nd more on new, private sector
business models. State laws, local ordinances, tax structures, and licenses and regulations will have to be re -
evaluated and likely re-shaped without sacrificing the overall quality of government services, including educatio n,
public health and public safety.
STATE MANDATES AND FUNDING OBLIGATIONS: The Planning District localities urge the governor
and legislature to 1) not impose financial or administrative mandates on localities; 2) not shift costs for
state programs to localities; and 3) not further restrict local revenue authority.
Locality budgets continue to be challenged by slowly-recovering local revenues, stagnant state funding
and additional requirements. While state general fund appropriations have increased by $2 billion since FY09,
state assistance to local government priorities has been taking a backseat to fast growing state Medicaid and
debt service expenditures. As the State faces another budget shortfall in the current biennium, we urge
policymakers to preserve existing funding formulas rather than altering them in order to save the state money
and/or shift costs to localities. The State should undo the across -the-board reductions in aid-to-localities that are
helping to balance the state budget.
We oppose unfunded state and federal mandates and the cost shifting that occurs when the state fails to
fund requirements or reduces or eliminates funding for state-supported programs. Doing so strains local ability
to craft effective and efficient budgets to deliver services mandated by the state or demanded by residents. The
State should examine how services are delivered and paid for in the future as a different economy takes hold in
Virginia. Finally, the State should not alter or eliminate the BPOL and M achinery and Tools taxes, or divert
Communications Sales and Use Tax Fund revenues intended for localities to other uses. Instead, as stated in
our top legislative priority, the legislature should broaden the revenue sources available to localities.
PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING: The Planning District localities urge the State to fully fund its share of
the realistic costs of the Standards of Quality without making policy changes that reduce funding or shift
funding responsibility to localities.
The state will spend about $5.55 billion on public education in FY15, about 32% of its general fund
budget. The level of state funding for FY15 represents a $250 million increase from FY14, though state per pupil
expenditures for FY15 of $5,035 are still well below the FY09 high of $5,274 per pupil. Meanwhile, local
governments boost education funding by spending over $3.5 billion more per year than required by the state.
Reductions in state public education dollars the last four to five years have been accomplished m ainly
through policy changes that are decreasing the state’s funding obligations moving forward. The State also made
policy changes to the Virginia Retirement System (mandatory teacher 5% for 5%) that increased local costs and
did nothing to reduce a $15 billion unfunded teacher pension liability. Education expenditures are expected to
continue increasing, as the percentage of at-risk students continues to rise (they have risen from rom 26% in
2007 to over 33% in 2013) and VRS contribution rates for teacher s, which jumped 24% this biennium,
experience additional, albeit smaller, hikes in the coming years.
TRANSPORTATION FUNDING and DEVOLUTION: The Planning District localities urge the State to find
additional revenues for secondary/urban construction and for unpaved roads. We oppose any legislation
or regulations that would transfer responsibility to counties for construction, maintenance or operation
of current or new secondary roads.
OTHER LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES
18
We urge the state to restore formula allocations for secondary/urban c onstruction and for unpaved
roads, and we support stable and increasing dollars for cities and towns to maintain their roads. Previous
legislative changes (2012) authorize $500 million off the top for Commonwealth Transportation Board priorities
before funds are provided to the construction fund. Accordingly, construction funding for secondary and urban
roads, suspended in 2010, has not been restored and will continue to be elusive given recent reductions in
revenues. State revenues for the current Six-Year Improvement Program are expected to be down nearly $500
million from the previous plan, which itself fell by more than $900 million.
We believe that efficient and effective transportation infrastructure, including the secondary road system,
is critical to a healthy economy, job creation, a cleaner environment and public safety. Accordingly, we oppose
shifting the responsibility for secondary roads to local entities, which could result in vast differences among
existing road systems in different localities, potentially placing the state at a competitive economic disadvantage
with other states when considering business and job recruitment, and movement of goods.
WATER QUALITY: The Planning District localities support the goal of improved water quality, b ut as we
face mounting costs for remedies, we believe major and reliable forms of financial and technical
assistance from the federal and state governments is necessary if comprehensive improvement
strategies for local and state waters emptying into the Chesapeake Bay are to be effective.
As local governments are greatly impacted by federal and state initiatives to reduce pollutants into state
waters, it is imperative that aggressive state investment in meeting required milestones for reducing Chesapeake
Bay pollution to acceptable levels occurs. This investment must take the form of authority, funding and other
resources to assure success, and must ensure that cost/benefit analyses are conducted of solutions that
generate the greatest pollution reductions per dollar spent. This includes costs associated with stormwater
management, for permitted dischargers to upgrade treatment plants and for any retrofitting of developed areas,
and to aid farmers with best management practices.
We also believe that implementation of the Nutrient Trading Act to allow exchange of pollution
allocations among various point and nonpoint sources should contain such exchanges within a particular
watershed, so as to improve the health of local waters.
LAND USE AND GROWTH MANAGEM ENT: The Planning District localities encourage the state to provide
local governments with additional tools to manage growth, without preempting or circumventing existing
authorities.
In the past, the General Assembly has enacted both mandated and optio nal land use provisions. Some
have been helpful, while others have prescribed one-size-fits-all rules that hamper different local approaches to
land use planning. Accordingly, we support local authority to plan and regulate land use and oppose legislation
that weakens these key local responsibilities.
Current land use authority often is inadequate to allow local governments to provide for balanced growth
in ways that protect and improve quality of life. Therefore, we believe the General Assembly should grant
localities additional tools necessary to meet important infrastructure needs. These include the following: 1)
impact fee and proffer systems that are workable and meaningful for various parties, without weakening our
current proffer authority; 2) impact fee authority for costs for facilities other than roads; 3) authority to enact
adequate public facility ordinances for determining whether public facilities associated with new developments
are adequate; and 4) state funding and incentives for localities, at their option, to acquire, preserve and maintain
open space.
EDUCATION:
The Planning District’s member localities believe that state funding for K-12 education in Virginia should
be realistic and recognize actual needs, practices and costs; otherwise, more of the funding burden will fall on
local taxpayers.
LEGISLATIVE POSITIONS and POLICY STATEMENTS
19
School Division Finances:
• The State should not eliminate or decrease funding for benefits for school employees.
• We support establishment of a mechanism for local appeal of the calculat ed Local Composite
Index to the State.
• We believe that unfunded liability associated with the teacher retirement plan should be a shared
responsibility of state and local government.
Literary Fund:
• The State should discontinue seizing dollars from the Literary Fund to help pay for teacher
retirement.
• We urge state financial assistance with school construction and renovation needs, including
funding for the Literary Loan and interest rate subsidy programs.
FINANCE:
The Planning District’s member localities believe the State should refrain from establishing local tax
policy at the state level and allow local governments to retain authority over decisions that determine the equity
of local taxation policy.
Local revenues:
The State should not confiscate or redirect local general fund dollars to the state treasury, as was done
in 2012 when it directed to the Literary Fund, a portion of fines and fees collected at the local level
pursuant to the enforcement of local ordinances.
Fiscal Impacts:
We support reinstatement of the “first day” introduction requirement for bills with local fiscal impact.
TOT:
The State should ensure the appropriate collection of transient occupancy taxes from online
transactions.
TRANSPORTATION:
The Planning District’s member localities recognize that state leaders took a big step in 2013 toward
addressing transportation infrastructure needs by approving a transportation funding package that is expected to
generate nearly $800 million per year by 2018, with funding targeted primarily for road maintenance, rail and
transit. We urge the State to 1) remain focused on providing sufficient revenues to expand and maintain all
modes of our transportation infrastructure; 2) provide more dedicated revenues for transit and ra il operations and
capital in order to keep pace with growing public needs and expectations; and 3) provide additional authority to
establish mechanisms for funding transit and non-transit projects in our region.
Transportation and Land Use Planning:
• We support ongoing state and local efforts to coordinate transportation and land use planning,
and urge state and local officials to be mindful of various local and regional plans when
conducting corridor or transportation planning within a locality or region.
• While we opposed closing of VDOT’s Louisa residency facilities and support its reopening, we
also support the option for the locality to purchase the property if available.
PUBLIC SAFETY:
The Planning District’s member localities encourage state financial support, cooperation and assistance
for law enforcement, emergency medical care, criminal justice activities and fire services responsibilities carried
out locally.
20
Funding:
• We urge the State to make Compensation Board funding a top priority, fully funding local
positions that fall under its purview. It should not increase the local share of funding
constitutional offices or divert funding away from them, but increase money needed for their
operation.
• We support restoration of state funding responsibility for the Line of Duty Act.
• We urge continued state funding of the HB 599 law enforcement program (in accordance with
Code of Virginia provisions).
• The State should increase funding to the Virginia Juvenile Community Crime Control Act
program, which has cut in half the number of juvenile justice commitments over the past decade.
• We support funding for mental health and substance abuse services at juvenile detention
centers.
Jails:
• The State should continue to allow exemptions from the federal prisoner offset and restore the
per diem payment to localities for housing state-responsible prisoners to $14 per day.
• The State should not shift costs to localities by altering the definition of state -responsible
prisoner.
Offender Programs and Services:
• We support continued state funding of the drug court program and the Offender Reentry and
Transition Services (ORTS), Community Corrections and Pretrial Services Acts.
• We support continued state endorsement of the role and authority of pretrial services offices.
• We support authorization for the court to issue restricted driver’s licenses to persons denied
them because of having outstanding court costs or fees.
COMPREHENSIVE SERVICES ACT:
The Planning District localities urge the State to be partners in containing costs of the Comprehensive
Services Act (CSA) and to better balance CSA responsibilities between state and local government. Since the
inception of CSA in the early 1990’s, there has been pressure to hold down costs, t o cap state costs for serving
mandated children, to increase local match levels and to make the program more uniform by attempting to
control how localities run their programs.
CSA Administration:
We request increased state dollars for local CSA administrative costs, as localities pay the overwhelming
majority of costs to administer this shared program. State dollars for administration have not increased
since the late 1990’s, while at the same time, administrative costs have jumped due to additional data
collection and reporting requirements.
Pool Expenditures:
• The State should provide full funding of the state pool for CSA, with allocations based on
realistic anticipated levels of need.
• The State should establish a cap on local expenditures in order to combat higher local costs for
serving mandated children, costs often driven by unanticipated placements in a locality.
• Categories of populations mandated for services should not be expanded unless the State pays
all the costs.
Efficiency:
• The State should be proactive in making residential facilities and service providers available,
especially in rural areas.
• In a further effort to help contain costs and provide some relief to local governments, we
recommend that the State establish contracts with CSA providers to provide for a uniform
contract management process in order to improve vendor accountability and to control costs.
21
ECONOMIC and WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT:
The Planning District’s member localities recognize economic development and workforce training as
essential to the continued viability of the Commonwealth. We support policies and additional state funding that
closely link the goals of economic and workforce development and the state’s efforts to streamline and integrate
workforce activities and revenue sources, and to align workforce supply with anticipated employer demands. We
also support state efforts to clearly define responsibilities of state and local governments and emphasize regional
cooperation in economic, workforce and tourism development.
Planning District Commissions:
• We support increased state funding for regional planning district commissions.
• We encourage opportunities for planning districts to collaborate with state officials and state
agencies on regional program and projects, and support funds for the Regional Competitiveness
Act to initiate and sustain such efforts.
Economic Development:
• We support increased state funding for the Industrial Site Development Fund, the Governor’s
Opportunity Fund and tourism initiatives that help promote economic development.
• We support legislation that dedicates income and sales tax revenues generated by corporations
and limited liability companies within an economic development project to such locality in cases
where the locality has expended local funds for such project and state grants funds or incentives
were not involved.
Broadband:
We encourage continuing state incentives and support for expediting deployment and reducing the cost
of broadband technology, particularly in underserved areas.
Agricultural Products and Enterprises:
We encourage state and local governments to work together and with other entities to identify, to provide
incentives for and to promote local, regional and state agricultural products and rural enterprises, and to
encourage opportunities for such products and enterprises through a balanced approach.
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY:
The Planning District’s member localities believe that environmental quality should be funded and
promoted through a comprehensive approach, and address air and water quality, solid waste management, land
conservation, climate change and land use policies. We are committed to protection and enhancement of the
environment and recognize the need to achieve a proper balance between environmental regulation and the
socio-economic health of our communities within the constraints of available revenues. Such an approach
requires regional cooperation due to the inter-jurisdictional nature of many environmental resources, and
adequate state funding to support local and regional efforts.
Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act:
We oppose legislation mandating expansion of the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act’s coverage area.
Instead, we urge the state to 1) provide legal, financial and techn ical support to localities that wish to
comply with any of the Act’s provisions, 2) allow localities to use other practices to improve water quality,
and 3) provide funding for other strategies that address point and non -point source pollution.
Water Supply:
The State should be a partner and advocate for localities in water supply development and should work
with and assist localities in addressing water supply issues, including investing in regional projects.
Alternate On-Site Sewage Systems:
We support legislative and regulatory action to 1) ensure operation and maintenance of alternative on -
site sewage systems in ways that protect public health and the environment, and 2) increase options for
localities to secure owner abatement or correction of syst em deficiencies.
22
Biosolids:
We support legislation enabling localities, as a part of their zoning ordinances, to designate and/or
reasonably restrict the land application of biosolids to specific areas within the locality, based on criteria
designed to further protect the public safety and welfare of citizens.
Program Administration:
The State should not impose a fee, tax or surcharge on water, sewer, solid waste or other local services
to pay for state environmental programs.
HEALTH and HUMAN SERVICES:
The Planning District’s member localities recognize that special attention must be given to developing
circumstances under which people, especially the disabled, the poor, the young and the elderly, can achieve
their full potential. Funding reductions to community agencies are especially troublesome, as their activities often
end up preventing more costly services later. The delivery of health and human services must be a collaborative
effort from federal, state and local agencies.
Funding:
• We oppose changes in state funding or policies that increase the local share of costs for human
services. We also oppose any shifting of Medicaid matching requirements from the State to
localities.
• The State should provide sufficient funding to allow Community Services Boards (CSBs) to meet
the challenges of providing a community-based system of care, including maximizing the use of
Medicaid funding. We believe children with mental health needs should be treated in the mental
health system, where CSBs are the point of entry.
• We support increased investment in the MR waiver program for adults and young people and
Medicaid reimbursement for children’s dental services.
• We urge full state funding to offset any increased costs to local governments for additional
responsibilities for processing applications for the FAMIS program.
• We support sufficient state funding assistance for older residents, to include companion and in -
home services, home-delivered meals and transportation.
Social Services:
We support the provision of sufficient state funding to match federal dollars for the administration of
mandated services within the Department of Social Services, and to meet the staffing standards for local
departments to provide services as stipulated in state law. We believe the current funding and program
responsibility for TANF employment services should remain within the social services realm.
Prevention:
We support continued operation and enhancement of early intervention and prevention programs,
including school-based prevention programs. This would include the state’s program for at-risk four-year-
olds and the Child Health Partnership and Healthy Families programs, as well as Part C of the
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (infants and toddlers).
Childcare:
The legislature should provide full funding to assist low-income working and TANF (and former TANF)
families with childcare costs. These dollars help working-class parents pay for supervised day care
facilities and support efforts for families to become self-sufficient.
HOUSING:
The Planning District’s member localities believe that every citizen should have an opportunity to afford
decent, safe and sanitary housing. The State and localities should work to expand and preserve the supply and
improve the quality of affordable housing for the elderly, disabled, and low- and moderate-income households.
Regional planning and solutions should be implemented whenever possible.
23
Affordable Housing:
We support the following: 1) local flexibility in the operation of affordable housing programs and
establishment of affordable dwelling unit ordinances; 2) creation of a state housing trust fund; 3) grants
and loans to low- or moderate-income persons to aid in purchasing dwellings; and 4) the provision of
other funding to encourage affordable housing initiatives.
Homelessness:
We support measures to prevent homelessness and to assist the chronic homeless.
Historic Structures:
We support incentives that encourage rehabilitation and preservation of historic stru ctures.
Green Buildings:
We encourage and support the use of, and request state incentives for using, environmentally friendly
(green) building materials and techniques.
GENERAL GOVERNMENT:
The Planning District’s member localities believe that since so many governmental actions take place at
the local level, a strong local government system is essential. Local governments must have the freedom and
tools to carry out their responsibilities.
Local Government Operations:
• We oppose intrusive legislation involving purchasing procedures; local government authority to
establish hours of work, salaries and working conditions for local employees; matters that can be
adopted by resolution or ordinance; and procedures for adopting ordinances.
• We support allowing localities to use alternatives to newspapers for publishing various legal
advertisements and public notices.
• We oppose attempts to reduce sovereign immunity protections for localities.
Freedom of Information Act:
• We request that any changes to the Virginia Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) preserve 1) a
local governing body’s ability to meet in closed session, 2) the list of records currently exempt
from disclosure under FOIA, and 3) provisions concerning creation of customized computer
records.
• We support changes to allow local and regional public bodies to conduct electronic meetings as
now permitted for state public bodies.
Quality of Life Issues:
• We oppose any changes to state law that further weaken a locality’s ability to regul ate noise or
the discharge of firearms.
• We support expanding local authority to regulate smoking in public places.
24
ATTACHMENT 8
1. Citizen Engagement:
Successfully engage citizens so that local government reflects their values and aspirations
Proposed Year One Priority:
A. By June 2015, increase opportunities for meaningful citizen engagement.
Planned/Possible Action(s):
Develop annual strategic communication plan to guide communication and engagement actions.
Establish protocols and improve resources and technologies that reach and respond to citizens
from diverse circumstances.
Restructure County Executive’s Office to improve support for elected official meetings with
constituents and coordination of ombudsman activities.
Develop and implement a plan to support Five Year Plan and budget town hall meetings.
Develop an interactive mapping option that enhances the geographic information that is
available to citizens.
Resource Consideration(s):
Additional investments in technology resources.
2. Critical Infrastructure:
Prioritize, plan and invest in critical infrastructure that responds to past and future changes and improves
the capacity to serve community needs
Proposed Year One Priorities:
A. By June 2015, establish and implement a 3-5 year plan for the use of the Ivy Material Utilization
Center as a waste handling and recycling facility.
Planned/Possible Action(s):
Determine the near term use of the Ivy MUC as either a Transfer Station or Convenience
Center.
If transfer station is desired, submitted required plans to DEQ.
Start construction planning process as required.
Establish necessary agreements with Rivanna Solid Waste Authority.
Resource Consideration(s):
None identified at this time.
B. By October 2015, establish a long-term solid waste plan, with an emphasis on reducing, reusing,
and recycling.
Planned/Possible Action(s):
Appoint Long Range Solid Waste Solutions Advisory Committee.
Evaluate the need for consultant assistance for the committee.
Approve a Public Engagement Plan to support the work of the committee.
Adopt the solid waste section of the Community Facilities Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan.
Committee delivers report to Board with recommended alternatives to meet long term needs.
Approve a long term solid waste plan.
25
Resource Consideration(s):
Possible funding for consultant assistance.
C. Proposed additional priority: By June 2015, establish direction and begin the design process to
meet the long-term needs of the Circuit and General District Court operations.
Planned/Possible Action(s):
Conclude discussions with City on decision to co-locate General District Courts.
Finalize negotiations on cost-sharing, property disposition, parking solutions, and facility
development option.
Initiate RFP process for design firms.
Resource Considerations:
Possible design consultant assistance if decision is made to co-locate the County and City
General District Courts.
3. Development Areas:
Attract quality employment, commercial, and high density residential uses into development a reas by
providing services and infrastructure that encourage redevelopment and private investment while protecting the
quality of neighborhoods
Proposed Year One Priority:
A. By June 2015, complete Comprehensive Plan Review and adoption.
Planned/Possible Action(s):
Monthly Board meetings to review each Comprehensive Plan chapter.
Final public hearing and adoption of the Plan.
Resource Consideration(s):
None identified at this time.
4. Economic Prosperity:
Foster an environment that stimulates diversified job creation, capital investment and tax revenues that
support community goals
Proposed Year One Priority:
A. By June 2015, establish an Economic Development Office to achieve the County’s economic
development mission and goals.
Planned/Possible Action(s):
Complete Board and public engagement regarding the focus and priorities of the Office for the
first three years.
Complete hiring process for the new Director.
Complete a three year action plan for the Office that reflects the County’s economic
development focus and priorities and measures of success.
Educate the community about the importance of economic development, what it will look like and
how it will serve as an important resource for Albemarle County.
Resource Consideration(s):
Consideration of expanding support staff to 1.0 FTE.
5. Educational Opportunities:
26
Provide lifelong learning opportunities for all our citizens
Proposed Year One Priorities:
A. By June 2015, in partnership with the school system, identify potential improvements in funding
strategies for K-12.
Planned/Possible Action(s):
Consider a blue ribbon committee to explore funding methods.
Evaluate existing funding guidelines and policies.
Identify and pursue potential new sources of funding.
Resource Consideration(s):
None identified at this time.
B. By June 2015, a collaborative work group, which includes members of the School Division, Local
Government and community members, will identify possible short - and long-term solutions to
maintain, and possibly increase, the current availability of quality pre-school opportunities.
Planned/Possible Action(s):
Determine best approach to maintain funding and in-kind support for existing pre-school
classrooms.
Determine best approach for overall leadership and management of pre-school services for
Albemarle County.
Identify actions that can be taken to enhance services to Albemarle residents through the
existing pre-school network of services and develop cost estimates to achieve those actions.
Develop a long-range plan to ensure universal access to Evidence Based or Evidence Informed
Practice pre-school services for Albemarle residents including cost estimates.
Resource Consideration(s):
Facilitation costs for collaborative workgroup.
6. Natural Resources:
Thoughtfully protect and manage Albemarle County’s ecosystems and natural resources in both the rural
and development areas to safeguard the quality of life of current and future generations
Proposed Year One Priorities:
A. By October 2015, establish direction and funding for a program to improve water quality.
Planned/Possible Action(s):
Establish a Water Resources Funding Advisory Committee.
Hire consultant to support the committee.
Committee delivers report to the Board.
Board approves desired level of service and selects funding so lution for Five Year Plan.
Resource Consideration(s):
None identified at this time.
B. Successfully implement the County’s stormwater management programs.
NOTE: The County’s stormwater management program has moved to an operational status through the
hiring of inspectors to meet State mandates and achieve the County’s stormwater management goals.
27
Continued implementation of the stormwater management plan will be incorporated in the County’s
overall water quality improvement efforts.
7. Operational Capacity:
Ensure County government’s ability to provide high quality service that achieves community priorities
Proposed Year One Priorities:
A. By December 2014, complete review of staffing needs through consideration of the Five Year
Financial Plan.
Planned/Possible Action(s):
Staff development and presentation of the proposed Five-Year Financial Plan.
Proposed Plan will include consideration of Water Resource Manager and Rural Planner
positions.
Board review and adoption of the Plan by December 2014.
Resource Consideration(s):
No additional resources needed for development and review of the Plan.
B. By January 2015, identify and propose staffing resources needed to meet the Board’s
transportation priorities.
Planned/Possible Action(s):
Clarify needs and expectations for additional staffing.
Evaluate and identify organizational alternatives to address transportation needs.
Evaluate staffing and funding alternatives to address identified needs.
Resource Consideration(s):
Possible mid-year addition of 1.0 FTE.
8. Rural Areas:
Preserve the character of rural life with thriving farms and forests, traditional crossroad communities and
protected scenic areas, historic sites, and biodiversity
Proposed Year One Priority:
A. By June 2015, complete Comprehensive Plan Review and adoption.
Planned/Possible Action(s):
Monthly Board meetings to review each Comprehensive Plan chapter.
Final public hearing and adoption of Plan.
Resource Consideration(s):
None identified at this time.
28
ATTACHMENT 9
On behalf of the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors and local government,
we would like to honor and recognize
Donna Shaunesey
for her outstanding efforts during the past 30 years at JAUNT, of which she served 18 years
as Executive Director. As one of the first four Certified Community Transit Managers in the country,
Donna oversaw the implementation of a variety of initiatives involving regional transportation which had a
positive impact on the quality of life of many residents in our community.
In recognition of her numerous contributions to the community and as a champion of JAUNT’s mission
to safely, courteously and promptly provide public and specialized services to meet community
mobility needs, Donna was awarded the 2014 Helen Poore Distinguished Service Award and
Unsung Hero Award.
During her tenure with JAUNT, Donna has been active in statewide and local organizations focused
on the betterment of our community, including past chair of the Community Transportation
Association of Virginia, the Virginia Trans it Association, Charlottesville-Albemarle Metropolitan
Planning Organization, and Association of Providers of Rural Independent Living.
We, as a community, are strengthened by the contributions and commitment of citizens
such as Donna Shaunesey whose dedication, professionalism and advocacy in meeting community
mobility needs make Albemarle County a better place in which to live and work.
Signed and sealed this 1st day of October, 2014.
29
ATTACHMENT 10
ZTA-2014-4 Wireless
Modification of submittal requirements and how tree information is submitted.
- Staff will develop alternative standards and bring them back to the Board.
Provision to allow the requirement of photo simulations.
- Staff will bring this amendment to the Board.
Modification of the critical slope regulations to allow the tower and base station without a special
exception.
- The Board did not support this amendment.
Modification of the critical slope regulations to require the access road to require a special exception.
- Staff will bring this amendment to the Board.
Modification of method of reducing setback to include a letter of authorization from the abutting owner.
- The Board did not support this amendment.
Modification of allowing base station equipment to be closer to the property line.
- The Board did not support this amendment.
Provisions for temporary facilities with modifications to the time limit.
- Staff will bring this amendment to the Board.
Removal of requirement for a Certificate of Appropriateness.
- The Board requested additional comments from the Architectural Review Board and the Planning
Commission.
30
ATTACHMENT 11
The Honorable Terry McAuliffe
Office of the Governor
Patrick Henry Building, 3rd Floor
1111 East Broad Street
Richmond, Virginia 23219
Dear Governor McAuliffe:
The Albemarle County Board of Supervisors requests that the General Assembly increase
appropriations to the Stormwater Local Assistance Fund (SLAF) during the 2015 session.
The SLAF was created by the General Assembly in 2013 to provide matching grants to local
governments for the planning, design, and implementation of stormwater best management practices that
contribute to the reduction of water quality pollutant loads to State waters. This fund offers much -needed
assistance to local governments facing the significant costs of new State mandates related to total maximum
daily load (“TMDL”) standards, or cleanup plans, for local and regional waters, including the Chesapeake Bay.
Of the $35 Million made available as part of the 2013 SLAF program, the Department of Environmental
Quality (DEQ) awarded approximately $23 Million in funding to localities. The demand for this funding was
significant – eligible funding proposals requested a total of $31 Million – despite localities having only enough
time to submit projects that were, for the most part, already in the planning or design phase. Albemarle County is
thankful to have received funding for one of the three projects it submitted for consideration.
Approximately $28M has been made available through this year’s program. It is possible that this
amount may be enough to fund the most competitive submitted projects. However, the Board believes that
subsequent years will likely see a significant rise in localities’ need for funding assistan ce. Localities are currently
focused on preparing required action plans for the Chesapeake Bay TMDL and applicable local TMDLs, which
are due to the DEQ in October 2015. This time next year, many localities will have identified a long list of projects
they will need to implement over a period of 10 to 12 years and will also have developed a sense of the costs
they will face.
Localities are grateful for the funding assistance that is available through the SLAF Program. It is
reasonable that the State has begun providing financial support for local project implementation which, in turn,
supports Virginia’s Chesapeake Bay Watershed Implementation Plan and Virginia’s general obligation to restore
State waters under the Federal TMDL program. However, the monies necessary to implement locality projects –
and, subsequently, the need for funding assistance – will increase dramatically in the next few years. So, too,
should the available SLAF funds.
We ask that you please champion a significant increase in SLAF fund ing to keep up with future locality
needs.
Sincerely,
Jane D. Dittmar
Chair