Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUB201800039 Review Comments Road Plan and Comps. 2020-10-13�w gr,ye �� �y� County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Matt Wentland — CDD Engineering From: Tori Kanellopoulos — CDD Planning Date: October 13, 2020 Subject: SUB201800039 — Briarwood Ph 6 — Road Plans (dated 09-03-20) The following are Planning comments on the second resubmittal of SUB201800039, Briarwood Phase 6 Road Plans: r`nmmnn} Q.rnmmonri n,,,Arlo rnmmonf racnnneo loffa 2. Advisory Comment: This road plan has been reviewed for Planning comments on the road plan requirements; it has not been reviewed for all subdivision plat comments. These are provided with the final subdivision plat. 3. 116-30.7] and 114-304] Steep slopes. Indicate It the request Tor disturbance of slopes was already reviewed/approved with a previous application, such as WPO. The County's GIS indicates preserved and managed slopes in this area, however aerials appear to show the area was already graded. It appears the slopes were to be surveyed by the applicant. See following ZMA proffer requirement: 3. Critical slopes may be disturbed for the construction of roads only with the prior approval of the County Engineer. Otherwise, the disturbance of critical slopes is permitted only as authorized by the applicable Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance regulations as provided by Zoning Ordinance § 8.5.5 2. REV 1: Addressed. This was previously addressed with the WPO. 4. [18-30.7] and [14-304] Steep slopes. Revise the steep slopes note to the following: "Preserved and managed steep slopes are shown on this plan. Portions of the preserved slopes will be field surveyed to verify the limits of the 25% slopes along the edges of the preserved slopes. Any preserved steep slope areas that are modified during the field survey verification process shall be developed as managed steep slopes per the design standards manual"County Engineer approval on such topographic information is required prior to approval. Regardless of whether the County Engineer is satisfied with the new topographic information or not, the labeling of the slopes does not change. a. REV 1: Addressed. 5. Notes: The Tax Map Parcel number appears to be incorrectly listed and should be: 032GO-00-00-001 R4. a. REV 1: Addressed. 6. Notes: Remove the note on Sheet 1 referring to density; this is not needed. a. REV 1: Addressed. 7. Notes: The Phasing note on Sheet 1 should be consistent with the final plat (SUB202000040) and list the lots as 126-138. a. REV 1: Addressed. 8. Notes: The amount of open space provided should be consistent with the final plat. The final plat shows 13.602 acres of open space, however, the road plan has 14.26 acres. a. REV 1: Addressed. 9. Notes: The acreage of lots should be consistent between the road plan and final plat; the road plan has 2.29 acres for lots and the final plat has 2.25. a. REV 1: Addressed. 10. Notes: The landscaping note on sheet 1 indicates a final site plan will be provided; however, the proposed units are single-family detached, which do not require a site plan (18-32.2). Please clarify. If there will not be a site plan, provide all required landscaping information with the road plan. a. REV 1: Addressed. 11. Notes: Label street trees (type). Revise landscaping note — trees are for Sunset Drive, not Avenue. 12. [14-410(F)] Sidewalk and planting strip must be located within the public ROW. Revise location of lots or of ROW. a. REV 1: Partially addressed — there is still a note for a `sidewalk easement'. Is this needed, given the sidewalk is completely within the public ROW now? 13. [14-41 � , road. Revise location of planting strip. a. REV 1: Addressed. 14. [14-302(A)(4)] and [14-317] Private easements. Retaining walls on lots require easements and maintenance documents per 14-317. Show the retaining walls for easements on the final plat. 15. [14-302(A)(4)] and [14-302(A)(5)] Easements. a. Note that easements must be consistent with the easements shown on the final plat. i. REV 1: Label the ACSA waterline easement between Lots 135-136. b. Shop,. sanitary easement, given improvement shown. i. REV 1: Comment withdrawn. c. The public drainage easement does not appear to be labeled. d. As depicted, offsite easements are required for the work on TMP 032G-01-28. Without an easement, provide written documentation from the property owners permitting the work. i. REV 1: Comment remains. e. REV 1: As depicted, offsite grading is shown on TMP 032G0-06-00-036A0. Without an easement, provide written documentation from the property owners permitting the work. Or revise grading so that it is not located on this lot. 16. [14-302(A)(16)1 7 break inunda ile lots are not [ed within the State DBIZ, the remain,, 9 parcel/open spacc ib. , j = State DBIZ limits bnould be labeled. a. REV 1: Addressed. 17. [ZMA2005-9, Application plan] Continue the trail and the trail easement throughout the proposed open space for this phase. The application plan depicts the trail connecting to Sunset Drive between lots 133 and 132 (where the SWIM facility drainage ties to the cul- de-sac). This exact location may be modified provided the trail connects to the cul-de- sac. Show where this trail is connecting to the existing trail. ZMA application plan for reference. Planning has highlighted the trail in red: 18. [14-435]/Advisory Comment Note that improvements must be built or bonded prior to final approval.