HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUB201900158 Review Comments Road Plan and Comps. 2020-10-20t VI4r
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
To: Emily Cox — CDD Engineering
From: Tori Kanellopoulos - Senior Planner
Division: Planning Services
Date: October 20, 2020
Subject: SUB201900158 — Spring Hill — Road Plan Amendment dated 10-09-20
This road plan amendment is reviewed per ZMA2020-6, approved 09-16-20
The following are Planning comments for Road Plan submittal SUB201900158:
Planning (Tori Kanellopoulos):
1. Advisory comment. Planning review of this Road Plan is for comments specific to Road
Plan requirements only. Planning approval of the Road Plan does not constitute
subdivision plat or site plan approval; Planning has not reviewed this Road Plan for other
requirements such as setbacks, minimum lot size, open space, etc.
2. Advisory comment. Recommend provide comment response letter to expedite review
of resubmittal.
3. Advisory comment. An easement plat will be needed to provide public access for the
path outside the ROW along Route 20. This will need to include an instrument for
maintenance and public access. A template has been sent to the applicant.
a. REV 1: Easement plat may be approved after road plan approval. An
easement plat is currently under review.
4. ZMA202000006, Proffer #4, SR 20 (Scottsville Road). The applicant is responsible to
design, bond, and construct the improvements shown on the County -approved
engineering drawings titled Spring Hill Village — Application Plan, dated 04-20-20 and
last revised on 8-21-20, as prepared by Collins Engineering, for both SR 20 (Scottsville
Road) and SR 742 (Avon St Ext). The following proffer requirements are still not met or
shown on the Road Plan:
public access will be provided along the shared -use path
along Koute zu, as the path is mostly outside of the public ROW. Note that the
road plan can be approved prior to the easement plat needed for maintenance
and public access for the path (but the final site plan must be approved after the
5. 18-32.6, 32.7; 14-302(A)(4)(5) Easements. -ements
a. REV 1: Where are the public drainage deed, sight distance easement,
private street agreement, and SWM deed recorded? They do not appear to
be with the plat and private maintenance agreement, according to the Circuit
Court site. The instrument for DB 5382 PG 138 is attached. The road plan
can be approved without these documents recorded, but the final site plan
cannot be.
6. 18-32.7.9 Landscaping and utilities. Revise the following tree location adjacent to
a. REV 1: Please revise landscape cover sheet; it appears CAD layers were
shifted. The plan sheet L5.1 appears correct.
7. VDOT requirements and 18-32.7.9 Landscaping and utilities. Note that trees appear to
need to be moved back along Route 20 to meet VDOT clearzone requirements. Ensure
that revised trees do not conflict with the undergrounded power utilities or any pipes
once moved.
a. REV 1: Planning has no objection to the tree locations shown on the road plan.
Planning defers to VDOT on whether clearzone requirements have been met.
Please contact Tori Kanellopoulos in the Planning Division at vkanell000ulosC)albemarle.oro or
434-296-5832 ext. 3270 for further information.