Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP202000051 Correspondence 2020-11-05CESO40 VALVOLINE INSTANT OIL CHANGE - CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA (GANDER DRIVE) CIVIL REVIEW COMMENT RESPONSE #3 TO: Patricia Saternye, Senior Planner FROM: Kelly Schwieterman, P.E. RE: Final Site Plan - Valvoline (SDP202000051) DATE: 11 /5/2020 The following is CESO's response to the civil final site plan review comments received on 10.27.2020 regarding the proposed Valvoline Instant Oil Change at Gander Drive Charlottesville, VA 22901: Department Review Comments 1. Please provide on the initial site plans, based on the Albemarle County Community Development Comments: a) ACSA Remarks: Sheet C6.0 - Remove coded Note 4. ACSA provides the 1" meter. Coded note refers to an irrigation plan. This is not attached in the site plan submission. Response: Revised Coded Note 4 for clarity on meter. Irrigation plan is included in this submittal. Irrigation plan was also emailed to reviewer in case of error occurring during submission/transmittal. ii. Irrigation application is blank. Complete the application for review. This can be submitted directly to ACSA. This can be submitted at a later date with an application fee, if project schedule is tight. Response: Irrigation application has been submitted directly to ACSA. b) CDD ARB Remarks: i. See ARB-2020-82 CoA Response: CoA has been received and acknowledged. Department of Community Development Comments 2. A site plan meeting all the requirements of section 32.6 of Chapter 18 of the Code. Community Response 08/21 /2020: Comment not fully yet fully addressed. Address comments below. CESO Response 09/21/2020: See responses below Community Response 10/27/2020: Comment not yet fully addressed. Response: See responses below. Page 2 of 3 9. [32.5.2(k) & 32.5.2(1)11 Private & public easements; Existing and proposed utilities. Address the following: c. If any easements are required an easement plat must be submitted (separate application, fee and submission) and approved prior to the approval of the final site plan. CESO Response 06/16/2020: Noted for future action. Please provide information on any other utilities the county would desire for utilities Community Response 08/21/2020: Comment not yet full addressed. An easement plat must be submitted (separate application, fee and submission), reviewed, approved and recorded prior to the approval of the final site plan. CESO Response 09/21/2020: Easements plat submittals will be submitted along with this submittal. Community Response 10/27/2020: Comment not fully addressed. The easement plan has been submitted and is under review. It must be approved and recorded prior to the approval of the final site plan. Response: Easements are currently in approval process. In the meantime, we will resubmit plans so that the easement is the only outstanding item regarding approval. 11. [32.5.2.(e), 32.5.2.(p) & 32.6.20)] Landscape plan. A landscape plan is required in the final site plan that complies with section 32.7.9. A landscape plan was submitted but requires additional information for the final site plan. Such information should include, but is not limited to, the following: h. Revise the existing conditions sheet to include the required information on the existing trees. CESO Response 06/16/2020: Existing trees labeled, per comment. Community Response 08/21/2020: Comment not yet fully addressed. Address the following: ii. Ensure labels are provided for all existing tree that include all the required information. "Multi -Trunk Tree" does not meet the minimum requirements. CESO Response 09/21/2020: Label revised Community Response 10/27/2020: Comment not yet fully addresses. Address the following: a) Two of the existing street trees do not appear to have their species and size labeled. Add labels for these trees. Response: Labels provided, per comment. b) Two of the existing street trees have labels, but the labels are obscured by other text or thick linework. Ensure existing tree labels are visible. Response: Clearer labels provided per comment p. Revise calculations for the trees and shrubs in the parking area to include all 13 provided parking spaces. The two existing spaces are part of the parcel and therefore must be included. Response: Revised per comment 15. [Comment] See the SRC comments from most of the reviewers attached. All SRC reviewer comments must be sufficiently address prior to final site plan approval CESO Response 06/16/2020: Comments addressed Community Response 08/21/2020: Comment not yet fully addressed. See attached comments from other reviewers. All reviewer comments must be sufficiently address prior to final site plan approval. CESO Response 09/21/2020: Comments addressed Community Response 10/27/2020: Comment not yet fully addressed. See attached comments from other Initial: Page 3 of 3 reviewers. All reviewer comments must be sufficiently address prior to final site plan approval. Response: Comments addressed, see above. Please feel free to contact me if you have any further questions as to how the comments have been addressed. Kelly Schwieterman, P.E. Project Manager Office: 937.401.3413 schwieterman@cesoinc.com Initial_