HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP202000049 Correspondence 2020-11-10® COLLINS ENGINEERING
November 9, 2020
Paty Saternye
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
RE: Mill Creek Industrial Park— Lot 11- Final Site Development Plan (SDP2020-00049)
200 GARRETT ST, SUITE K CHARLOTTESVILLE VA 22902
��434.293.3719 PH 434.293.2813 FX
www.coll ns-eng ineeri ng.com
Thank you for your comments dated November 5, 2020 on the above referenced project. The following provides a summary of how
the comments have been addressed:
Planning Comments:
1. As of July 6th, 2020 the owner of the property is 1205 Stoney Ridge, L-C. The Owner information has been updated to
Stoney Ridge LLC on the cover sheet.
2. The setback label has been updated as requested.
3. Comment previously addressed.
4. Comment previously addressed.
5. See below:
a. The proposed use note has been updated on the cover sheet as requested.
b. The building label has been updated as requested on all plan sheets.
c. Acknowledged.
6. Comment previously addressed.
7. Comment previously addressed.
S. Comment previously addressed.
9. Comment previously addressed.
10. See below:
a. Comment previously addressed.
b. Comment previously addressed.
C. Comment previously addressed.
d. The applicant shall submit a plat and application for all proposed easements for review and approval prior to
final site plan approval, as required.
11. See below:
a. Comment previously addressed.
b. Comment previously addressed.
C. Comment previously addressed.
12. Comment previously addressed.
13. The label for the proposed safety railing on sheet 3 has been updated as requested.
14. Comment previously addressed.
15. See below:
a. The large shade trees have been updated along the street frontage to address the engineering comments.
b. Comment previously addressed.
C. Comment previously addressed.
d. Comment previously addressed.
e. The limit of clearing and grading lines are now shown on the Grading & Utility Plan and Landscape Plan sheets.
f. Comment previously addressed.
g. The light locations no longer conflict with the trees.
h. Trees have been relocated to meet engineering requirements and landscaping requirements.
16. Comment previously addressed.
17. Comment previously addressed.
18. Comment previously addressed.
19. Comment previously addressed.
20. Comment previously addressed.
21. Comment previously addressed.
22. See below
a. Comment previously addressed.
b. Per the manufacturer (LSI) the WPSLS is available in color temperatures 3000K, 4000K, and 5000K. An updated
cut sheet is provided selecting the 3000K option, see Lighting Plan WPSLS cut sheets.
C. Comment previously addressed.
d. The tilting note (3) on the lighting sheet has been revised.
e. The light fixtures are now shown on the landscaping plan. Plants have been relocated.
f. The two light poles in conflict with the riprap have been relocated.
23. Comment previously addressed.
24. See below:
a. Comment previously addressed.
b. Comment previously addressed.
C. Comment previously addressed.
d. A series of 2' curb cuts are now provided across the long curb gaps to prevent safety issues.
25. See below:
a. The parking calculation is updated to include 2 parking spaces for customer parking.
b. Comment previously addressed.
26. The top and bottom of wall labels are shown on the grading sheet.
27. The applicant acknowledges this requirement.
28. A north arrow is shown on sheets 2, 4, 6 & 8.
29. The site plan is printed in black and white.
30. The handicap parking sign is labeled on sheet 3.
Engineering Comments:
1. Comment previously addressed.
2. Comment previously addressed.
3. Comment previously addressed.
4. Comment previously addressed.
5. Comment previously addressed.
6. Comment previously addressed.
7. Comment previously addressed.
8. Comment previously addressed.
9. Comment previously addressed.
10. Acknowledged.
11. The applicant shall submit a plat for all proposed easements for review and approval prior to final site plan approval.
12. Multiple 2' curb cuts are now provided across the long curb gaps previously proposed.
13. Two of the large shade trees (1 AS and 1 UPA) have been relocated west of the SWM basin. The SPA large shade tree has
been replaced with a small shade tree (1 PY).
14. The profile on sheet 8 has been updated to list 3:1 slopes.
Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact Scott Collins at scott@collins-engineering.com.
Sincerely,
Scott Collins, PE