HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP202000049 Review Comments Final Site Plan and Comps. 2020-12-17Phone 434-296-5832
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4579
Memorandum
To: Scott Collins (cs o!L@collins-en ing eering com)
From: Paty Satemye, Senior Planner
Division: Planning
Date: August17,2020
Rev. 1: November 5, 2020
Rev. 2: December 17, 2020
Subject: SDP 202000049 Mill Creek Industrial Park — Lot I I — Final Site Development Plan
Fax 434-9724126
The County of Albemarle Planning Division will recommend approval of the plan referenced above once the following
comments have been satisfactorily addressed (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time.
Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.): [Each comment is preceded by
the applicable reference, which is to the Subdivision/Zoning Ordinances unless otherwise specified.]
Initial Site Plan Comments (from approval letter dated 3/16/16):
5. [32.5.2(b)] Clarify if the "offices" proposed are in support of the industrial use. Industrial Offices serving this use are
allowed by -right (see definition), but Independent offices are not.
IndustrialOffrces: Offices that are owned and operated by the same business entity engaged in a
Laboratories/Research and Development/Experimental Testing, Manufacturing/Processing/
Assembly/Fabrication/Recycling, or a Storage/Warehousing/Distribudon/Transportation use located in
Albemarle County or the City of Charlottesville, where the offices provide services to the industrial use but which
need not be on the same site as the industrial use. For the purposes of this definition, "Offices that are owned and
operated by the same business entity" does not mean offices that are part of an entity that is in an affiliated
business entity relationship or a parent -subsidiary relationship with the entity engaged in the industrial use.
Final: Comment not yet addressed. See comment #20 below in reference to Phase II not being allowed based upon the
approved initial site plan. Phase I only proposes a "commercial office building". Any independent or commercial
office use is not allowed in this development without a Special Use Permit. Either revised Phase I to be for an
approved use under the current zoning or a Special Use Permit (SP) or Zoning Map Amendment (ZMA) will be
required. If a new SP or ZMA Amendment is required a new initial site plan, for the use allowed by the SP or ZMA
Amendment must be submitted and approved prior to final site plan submittal. If the "offices" proposed in Phase I are
"industrial offices" (as defined in 3.1) serving an industrial use then contact the planning review coordinator for further
information.
Rev. 1: Comment not yet fully addressed. Address the following:
c) Please note that at time of zoning clearance any office space within the building will have to be proven to be
"industrial offices" based upon that definition.
Rev. 2: Comment still stands. Please note that at time of zoning clearance any office space within the building
will have to be proven to be "industrial offices" based upon that definition.
Page 1 of 2
10. 132.5.2(], k)] Verify that all lines and all necessary easements for proposed water, sewer and drainage facilities have
been shown on the plan.
Final: Comment not yet fully addressed. Address the following:
d) If any easements are proposed with this site plan the easement plat and all required deeds must be recorded prior to
the final site plan approval.
Rev. 1: Comment not yet fully addressed. Submit a new application fee and plat for all proposed easements. The
easement plat must be reviewed, approved, recorded and the deed book and page number of the plat and deeds
must be provided to the County prior to Final Site Plan approval.
Rev. 2: Comment not vet addressed. Submit the easement plat as specified in the Rev. 1 comment above. Final
Site Plan cannot be approved until the easement plat is approved and recorded.
Additional comments for Final Site Plan:
22. 132.5.2(n) & 32.6.2(k) & 4.171 Address the following in reference to the manufacturer's cut sheets and the
Luminaire Legend and Schedule:
b) Revise the color temperature of the WP luminaire to be a "warm white" between 2000 and 3000.
Rev. 1: Comment not yet fully addressed. Although 3,000 K is specified in a note, and in added text to the
manufacturers cut sheet, the cut sheets to not appear to include that option. Clarify why 3,000 K is possible when
it is not shown as an option.
Rev. 2: Comment not vet fully addressed. Although not worded correctly, this comment was meant to apply to
both light fixtures. Only the wall mounted fixture has been updated to address it. Address the Rev. 1 comment for
the free-standing light fixtures as well.
27. [Comment] This site plan cannot be approved until all reviewers grant their approval. E911 and RWSA have no
objection. See the attached comments from all of the other reviewers.
Rev. 1: Comment not yet fully addressed. This site plan cannot be approved until all reviewers grant their approval
See the attached comments from all of the other reviewers.
Rev. 2: Comment not vet fullv addressed. See the attached comments from Engineering and ACSA. This site Dian
cannot be approved until all reviewers grant their approval. See the attached comments from all of the other reviewers.
29. Rev. 1: [New Comment] Ensure site plan is black and white. On sheet 4, note 8 appears to have had some text added
and it is red in color. Revise the text to be black.
Rev. 2: Comment not vet fullv addressed. Revise sheet 1 to no longer have color on it. The vicinitv maD should also
be black and white.
Staff has provided references to provisions of Chapter 18 of the Code of the County of Albemarle. The Code is kept up to
date by the County Attorney's office. The Code may found on the County Attorney's website which may be found under
"Departments and Services" at Albemarle.org.
In accord with the provisions of Section 32.4.3.5 of Chapter 18 of the Code if the developer fails to submit a revised final
site plan to address all of the requirements within six (6) months after the date of this letter the application shall be deemed
to have been voluntarily withdrawn by the developer.
Please contact Paty Saternye in the Planning Division by using psaternve(a),albemarle.org or 434-296-5832 ext. 3250 for
further information.
Page 2 of 2
SDP202000049 -Mill Creek Industrial Lot 11— Final —Dec. 2020
Engineering comments (David lames):
1. Submit a VSMP application & plan if you haven't already. Disturbance over 10,000sf. {17-3021
Addressed.
2. It appears that the parcel boundary line appears different than what's shown in County GIS, and
will need to confirm with real estate if property line shown is accurate.
Addressed.
3. Show areas of off -site disturbance in an easement (i.e. entrance improvements). Signed letter of
permission from an offsite owner is sufficient, but only for the purposes of this review, or record
a plat.
Acknowledged. VDOT approval on entrance improvements in ROW & VDOT entrance permit
required.
4. Submit design plans & comps for walls over 4' high prior to FSP approval.
Acknowledged; required with building permit application.
5. Cover —
a. Sign & date seal.
b. The stated sheet layout of 1" = 30' do not appear to be accurate.
Addressed.
6. Sheet 3 —
a. Remove curb before CG-12 and show access apron.
b. Show safety railing for walls over 30" high.
Addressed.
7. Sheet 4 — Provide reverse slope bench and/or surface water diversion for the graded slopes. {18-
30.7.5]
Addressed.
8. Sheet 5 —
a. Show ground cover (not grass) for disturbed slopes over 3:1 grade.
b. Remove proposed trees and place trees outside of public drainage easements.
Addressed.
9. Sheet 8 —Storm STR 4 to 2 the line is 12" dia. and will need an additional MH access (over 50'
length) [VDOT DM 9.3.6, table 9.3], or use a 15" dia.
Acknowledged; NA.
10. The VSMP plan will need to be approved prior to FSP approval. (Rev.l) Currently not
addressed.
11. Submit plat to record drainage & SWM facility & access easements prior to FSP approval.
(Rev.l) Currently not addressed.
12. Sheet 3—The curb cut gaps are too wide (safety concern). Site plans require curb & gutter. A
solution would be to provide narrower (2') and multiple openings instead. (Rev.1) Addressed.
13. Sheet 5 - These three trees are not acceptable near SWM basin embankment. Consider placing
shrubs or small trees instead. (Rev.l) Addressed.
A ,
14. Sheet zs - I ne proTlle ibTR : pes and appear to be inaccurate; 3:1
measured. 3:1 is acceptab (Rev.1) Addressed.
15. (Rev.1) Sheet 4, etc. — I'd like to see this ditch a bit more defined up to the emergency
spillway. Show ditch centerline and 451' contour or spot shot.
EXISTING ACSA.-J
DIP WATERLINE
2
I G DRIAINAGE EASEM Tom_ i ^S
I.1342-242 8, D.B. 2202-722): I p
i H
ROW 11 i
IJI I
Ex _ '.85
OSED INV IN-445.66 1 ,
16. (Rev.1) Sheet 5 — Remove large trees from embankment. I think the other one is fine; just
need to move it down past the 452' contour.
(a1 UPA
x\ i
Review Comments for SDP202000049 Final Site Development Plan
Project Name I Mill Creek Industrial Lot 11 - Final - Digital
Date Completed: Thursday, December 17, 2020 DepartrnentlDivision/Agency: Review Status:
Reviewer: Richard Nelson ] ACSA Requested Changes
Page: 1� Countyof Albemarle Printed On: 12117/ 0020